Home Blog Page 6190

Rahul Gandhi, your resignation is fooling no one, it is an exercise in power without responsibility

Rahul Gandhi is going nowhere. His resignation is an exercise in power without responsibility. True to his lineage, Mr Gandhi feels that he could fool all the people all the time.

Rahul Gandhi resignation letter leaves no one in doubt that Rahul Gandhi has quit as president for good. It also leaves no one in doubt that as a loyal worker, he would continue to work for the Congress against BJP and RSS who are in conflict with his idea of India.

He may or may not be president till July 10 when the Congress Working Committee (CWC) is likely to be dissolved and a new one formed. An interim president, Sushil Kumar Shinde or Mallikarjun Kharge, both nearing 80, would be asked to usher in a new Congress. Nobody gets a penny for predicting that Sonia Gandhi and her kids, Rahul and Priyanka, would be a part of it regardless of the resignation letter. Nobody would receive a dime too for predicting that the likes of Anand Sharma and Ghulam Nabi Azad, would still be doing the errands for them.

For a month and a half, since the 2019 results came in and a Congress-mukt Bharat became a reality—they don’t have a single seat in 16 states—the resignation drama has been an attempt to trade ridicule with sympathy. To hide the stink of a rotting corpse, a whiff of nostalgia has been floated. The young prince charming, all of 49, a bachelor who forsake good things in life and fought for his idea of India. The one who took on the might of Modi, BJP and RSS; who fought even as one by one all institutions were taken over, who traded hate with his brand of love, was an individual against the entire system.

Sure, the drama is well orchestrated. Before you could blame him for his party’s defeat, for his own humiliation in Amethi, for believing anti-Modi tirade would make up for the deficit in vision, for refusing allies only because a few states fell in his lap before the 2019 polls, for courting Hindus and losing his Muslim votebank, Mr Gandhi took the sting out of the horde at his gate by showing he is disarmed. How could you now punish a man who has swung an axe on his own neck?

Make no mistake: Gandhis are only worried about themselves, not about Congress or India. It’s only a bail which is standing in between Gandhis and jail. Priyanka Gandhi-Vadra has the additional worry on her husband, Robert Vadra meeting the same fate. They are pariahs even to Mamata or Mayawati or Akhilesh Yadav. Muslims no longer trust them. Shunned by the public, ostracized by politicians, they can only worry about their skin.

Gandhi’s letter would’ve been hilarious if it was not tragic. He claims every institution in the country—judiciary, press, election commission etc—has been taken over by the Modi government. That’s not music to the ears of the judiciary who intervened at midnight to allow Congress the batons of Karnataka. Which suffered the indignity of impeachment. The mainstream press which never wrote a single word against Gandhi. Election Commission which was reluctant to allow repolling in West Bengal.

“It’s now clear that our once cherished institutional neutrality no longer exists in India,’ Really? Was judiciary or press neutral during the Emergency? Or the august office of president? Who overturned Supreme Court on Shah Bano case? Who had taken over India’s institutions in the past?

In many ways Rahul Gandhi is inconsequential. He is an individual busy saving his skin. The bigger question is who saves Congress? Who saves the Grand Old Party when its’ very saviours are busy digging up its grave.

With the same ‘zor se bolo’ story to tell, were Kunal Kamra and Mahua Moitra traveling in the same plane and experienced the same turbulence?

Indian secular liberal brigade has finally seen another ray of light in the long night of Saffron reign. Mohua Moitra is the new liberal icon for the brigade to celebrate. After the scarcity of human resources that have been created after Kanhaiya’s loss, Hardik’s conviction and nobody taking Gurmehr Kaur seriously, Moitra might as well be the answer to all their hopes and dreams now.

The thunderous claps and combined hailings dimmed a little after allegations surfaced that Moitra might have plagiarised the speech that made her so famous. Moitra slipped a little further as she kept on with the screaming and ‘Mamata Banerjee-ish’ behaviour when journalists tried to question her over the plagiarism allegations. Trying to bring a privilege motion to bully a media house and its editor for questioning her after screaming about alleged fascism and media gagging in the country did not help her stand either.

Now, a rather unexpected claim has surfaced. Twitter user Rishabh Sharma shared a video clip where self-proclaimed stand up comic Kunal Kamra is seen uttering the very same few lines as a ‘joke’ that Moitra has passed off as a ‘personal experience’ to prove her point.


Kamra, in a stand up show, is seen telling one of his ‘jokes’ where there was a turbulence inside a plane and an old Hindu uncle untied his seat belt, stood up and shouted “Zor se bolo….”, the first part of the colloquial Hindu slogan where ‘Jai Mata Di’ follows next. Kamra then stated that in the same plane, a similarly old Muslim man was sitting and thinking what would have happened if he had shouted ‘his’ slogan, a sly reference to what usually happens after a sudden loud slogan that sounds a lot like ‘Ola Ho Uber’.

In her interview to Barkha Dutt on Tiranga TV, Moitra is seen making the claim that the same incident was one she had experienced herself, just like she had claimed on the same show that the parliament speech had ‘come from her heart’. Only Moitra did not present it as a joke like Kamra. She presented it as a real concern to claim how Muslims are treated differently.

The video clip has sparked Twitter reactions because Moitra, again quoting her fellow Amreeki left winger Martin Longman had stated that ‘Right Wing a%$holes are same in every country.’


It is, however, a matter of grave concern. How did all so-called left-wingers and anti-BJP opinion cum joke makers ended up in the same plane at the same time to experience the same turbulence? Kunal Kamra claims that he did not hear any person answered ‘Jai Mata Di’ to the Hindu uncle. But the situation is far too specific to have happened in two different instances.

Maybe Moitra was seated closer to the Hindu uncle and thus heard the ‘Jai Mata Di’ and Kamra was sitting too far back to hear anything. He just heard the Muslim uncle ‘thinking’ whether he should get up and shout ‘his’ slogan too. Both Kamra and Moitra however, being true seculars, had the first knee-jerk thought process of thinking about the Muslim uncle shouting ‘his’ slogan the moment they heard a communal slogan like “Zor se bolo..”

Coincidences and odds notwithstanding, the concerns raised by Kunal Kamra are very real and very scary indeed. People around the world are so consumed with hatred and so brainwashed by the RSS that a Muslim person suddenly standing up and shouting something that sounds like ‘Ola Ho Uber’ is bound to generate the same reaction.

There were even social experiments done over this. One that had irked the secular liberals very much. Experiments that show exactly how people react when they suddenly hear something that sounds like ‘Ola Ho Uber’.

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Q7HfxG19E8]

The fears are not exactly misplaced though. There is an actual concern among people that a person suddenly shouting something that sounds like ‘Ola Ho Uber’ might just blow up the next moment. The last time such slogans were heard inside a plane, the planes ended up crashing into New York’s twin towers.

In case ‘secular liberals’ might argue that these claims are false, the people who blow up also make videos to educate the general public before strapping on the vests that blow up. Pulwama bomber Adil Dar’s video in this regard was very clear and specific too. The bombers who recently blew themselves up killing over 300 people in Sri Lanka also had made videos and released social media posts to explain why they did it, and it had a lot to do with words that sounded like ‘Ola Ho Uber’.

Here is how the real purpose of the ‘Lynchistan’ narrative was to provoke actual violence

Yesterday in Surat.

Untitled.png

Untitled.png

How ironic that a “rally against mob lynching” incidents would consist of an angry mob attacking policemen?

Such violence is the natural culmination of a very calculated effort by anti-Modi liberals to build up hatred by stringing together a narrative of India being a place where minorities are lynched.

India has always had a weak law enforcement system. Our cops are poorly trained, generally unmotivated and our police to citizen ratio is one of the lowest in the world. The simplest of cases drag on in our courts for decades with no end in sight. Naturally, people in India don’t have much respect for the system. A sad corollary of this is that people in India sometimes resort to mob justice against those they perceive to be criminals.

This is a failure of the state and it certainly should be addressed. But liberals saw an opportunity in this chronic weakness of the Indian state. They decided to string together isolated incidents where Muslims were victims and made up a whole narrative that there is some kind of coordinated targeting of the Muslim community. The unfortunate victims became household names, with the facts of each case garnished from imagination and sprinkled “liberally” with lies.

Untitled.png

By the time the truth comes out, the truth no longer matters.

The campaign was initially intended to rally the ragtag “civil society groups,” who had fallen out of favour after the new Modi led BJP assumed power in Delhi. Their hope was to guilt trip the common Hindu. To their dismay, however, they discovered that things had changed in India. The common Hindu saw right through their half-truths and hypocrisies. Campaigns like “Award Wapsi” became the punchline for internet jokes and humour.

That’s when the liberals changed strategy and began playing in two other markets that Indian Hindus could not influence easily. The first was the “export market.” With the so-called first world still insecure about India’s rise, there was a lot of room in Western newspapers and media outlets for badmouthing India and Hindus. Uninformed foreign audiences could easily be fed the worst about India. And the revenue would be coming in much coveted $$$.

The second market is where it gets even more serious and dangerous. Pumping up the anger among Indian Muslims. In some ways, the lies about “Lynchistan” are even more dangerous than lying about riots. A riot is limited to a geographical area. Here, Indian Muslims are being pumped with lies that anybody anywhere could be under threat.

This is from Malegaon a few days ago.

Untitled.png

The killing of Tabrez Ansari in Jharkhand is again an example of a real event picked up and fitted into a false narrative.

This particular rally at Malegaon was peaceful, but the false narrative was disseminated among the crowd of lakhs. Listen to the speeches as reported by The Indian Express: “The crowd was also asked to spread the message among Muslims that the “victims of lynchings should not show helplessness in chanting Jai Shri Ram; instead, they should die by taking the Sahadat”.

This poison drip of lies has been fed to Indian Muslims for so long that violent reactions are coming in all over the place. On Eid day, a mob in Delhi threw stones and wrecked DTC buses in “retaliation” against what they thought was a deliberate disruption of their prayers.

Untitled.png

The facts? A car thief ran into the crowd while trying to get away in a vehicle he had stolen!

Then, there was the shocking incident in Chandni Chowk in Delhi, where a Durga Temple was vandalized.

And now Surat, where police have been attacked.

Since the day Modi came to power, a certain group of “liberals” has been anguished, trying to create violence so as to justify their doomsday predictions. And they don’t care if the nation burns down. As Modi spends more and more years in office and there is no actual evidence of systemic injustice to minorities, they are investing with more and more conviction into the “lynchistan” narrative of stringing together disparate events.

It is hard to say how to counter this narrative. Because this is purely an “information war.” Where it is very easy for liberals to mount a rhetorical offensive and accuse the other side of being insensitive to real victims of real crimes. The liberals enjoy the clear advantage in both theatres where this information war is being fought: foreign audiences who do not know anything about India and would like to believe the worst about us. And Indian Muslims whose victimhood complex has been carefully nurtured for seventy years.

There is only one thing the government can do, which it must. That enforces the law strictly. Those who rioted in Delhi on Eid day should have been punished severely. The same goes for the incident in Chandni Chowk and the latest incident in Surat. I am not sure it will arrest the fake narrative being spread about “Lynchistan”, but maintaining the rule of law is a must. On that, there can be no compromise.

World Cup Preview, India v Sri Lanka: A contest between Malinga and Bumrah

A legend playing his last World Cup, and his disciple playing his first World Cup will face each other in the last league of their teams. Malinga and Bumrah have played a lot for Mumbai Indians, and Bumrah learned a lot from Malinga about bowling yorkers after yorkers. It will be a treat for fans to watch them bowling against each other.

India, already qualified for the semis would be looking to win the match so that they can top the points table and hope South Africa to beat Australia. That would help them to play New Zealand in the semis, a weaker team than the host nation England. But, if you want to win the World Cup, you have to beat every good team in the competition.

Sri Lanka has nothing to lose, but they have a chance to end the tournament on a good note, beating India would give a lot of confidence to this inexperienced team. Malinga is playing his last World Cup match, and this should motivate the team to win the game for him.

A bright sunny day is expected for the day at Leeds.

Players to watch out

Rohit Sharma has scored 2 of his 3 ODI double hundreds against Sri Lanka and the kind of form he is in; there could be another double coming up. Rohit (544) also must be eyeing to surpass Tendulkar’s record of most runs (673) in a World Cup edition.

Bumrah has not taken a lot of wickets, but his accurate bowling helped other Indian bowlers to pick wickets. He is also on the verge of taking 100 ODI wickets for India.

India v Sri Lanka in ODIs:

Overall: Matches 158, India Won 90, Sri Lanka Won 56, Tied 1, No Result 11

World Cup: Matches 8, India Won 3, Sri Lanka Won 4, No Result 1

Recent Form (most recent first): India W L W W W, Sri Lanka W L W L NR

ICC Rankings: India (2), Sri Lanka (8)

Upcoming Records:

Rohit Sharma has scored 874 runs in World Cup and needs 126 more to become the fastest player to reach the 1,000 runs milestone in World Cup. Rohit has played 15 innings so far while Tendulkar and AB de Villiers took 20 innings each.

Jasprit Bumrah has taken 99 wickets and needs one more to reach the 100 wickets milestone in ODIs.

Squads:

India: Virat Kohli (capt), Jasprit Bumrah, Yuzvendra Chahal, Shikhar Dhawan, MS Dhoni (wk), Ravindra Jadeja, Kedar Jadhav, Dinesh Karthik (wk), Bhuvneshwar Kumar, Hardik Pandya, KL Rahul, Mohammed Shami, Vijay Shankar, Rohit Sharma, Kuldeep Yadav.

Sri Lanka: Dimuth Karunaratne (capt), Avishka Fernando, Suranga Lakmal, Lasith Malinga, Angelo Mathews, Jeevan Mendis, Kusal Mendis (wk), Kusal Perera (wk), Thisara Perera, Nuwan Pradeep, Dhananjaya de Silva, Milinda Siriwardana, Lahiru Thirimanne, Isuru Udana, Jeffrey Vandersay.

Amartya Sen courts controversy again, says Jai Shree Ram is an ‘excuse to beat up people’ and not ‘Bengali culture’

Nobel Laureate and leftist intellectual Amartya Sen has stated that the chant of ‘Jai Shri Ram’ is not associated with Bengali culture. Speaking at an event in Jadhavpur University last evening, Sen reportedly asserted that ‘Jai Shri Ram’ is merely an excuse to beat up people.


Sen furthered that it is Maa Durga and not Shri Ram that is omnipresent in the lives of Bengalis. He added that the celebration of Ram Navami is gaining popularity only recently and he has never heard of it before.

To prove his point, Sen quoted his 4-year-old granddaughter. He stated that when he asked his granddaughter who is her favourite deity, she replied that it is Maa Durga.

Sen’s statement came at the backdrop of the slogan’s widespread usage in the state during the elections. Ruling TMC and CM Mamata Banerjee had shown a disdain towards the slogan and there were instances where CM Mamata Banerjee had got down from her vehicle to threaten people who had chanted the slogans.

TMC government had also tried to jail people for chanting the ‘Jai Shri Ram’ slogan. Mamata Banerjee had stated that the slogan is inciting violence and it does not belong to Bengal.

Journalist Pritish Nandy had also earlier attempted to claim that the slogan Jai Sri Ram does not belong to Bengal.

The attacks on the chant of ‘Jai Shri Ram’ is not limited to Amartya Sen and Mamata Banerjee though. After repeated attempts to set a mainstream media narrative that the people chanting ‘Jai Shri Ram’ are not common public but BJP and RSS supporters, there have been many cases where Muslims have claimed that they were beaten up for not chanting the slogan, only to be proven false after investigation.

The recent incident where a Kanpur based auto driver Aatib claimed that he was thrashed by people for not chanting Jai Shri Ram’ turned out to be false after the police found that it was only a drunken brawl and the claims of the auto driver were false.

It is notable here that Amartya Sen has been in the news for lying and obfuscating about the NDA government’s 10% reservation bill. He is also one of the so-called secular liberals who often complain about the ‘rising intolerance’ level in the country. Though it is not clear why a self-proclaimed supporter of tolerance has decided to be intolerant towards the popular Hindu chant of ‘Jai Shri Ram’.

Muslim majority Tunisia bans Niqab in government offices for security reasons after the dastardly terror attack in June

Tunisia, the Noth African country’s Prime Minister Youssef Chahed signed a government circular “banning access to public administrations and institutions to anyone with their face covered for security reasons,” his office said. The premier court of the Muslim majority country enforced a ban on the niqab in government spaces citing security reasons.

The niqab is a garment that covers the entire face except for the eyes. This ban on the Niqab in government officers comes after the dastardly double suicide bombing on 27th June.

On 27th June, terrorists had carried out 2 fatal suicide bombings in quick succession against security forces in the capital city of Tunisia injuring several and killing at least 1 police officer. This was the second such suicide bombing in Tunisia in the past 9 months.

In February 2014, the interior minister of Tunisia had told the security forces to put up measures to supervise the wearing of the niqab so terrorists and Jihadis don’t use it to escape the law.

The reactions in Tunisia were mixed, as per reports in AFP. While some said that the government had the right to restrict the use of niqab, others said that it was a matter of personal choice.

“We are for the freedom to dress (as one pleases), but today with the current situation and the terrorist threats in Tunisia and across the region we find justifications for this decision,” the league’s president Jamel Msallem told AFP. He said the ban should be repealed as soon as “a normal security situation returns in Tunisia”.

Tunisia is a Muslim country with Islam being the state religion. The government of the country is considered the ‘Guardians of Islam’ and the constitution requires the president of the country to be a Muslim.

During the reign of Zine El Abidine Ben Ali, Tunisia’s longtime autocrat, any outward show of religion, even Islam, was not tolerated in Tunisia but the situation changed after the ‘revolution’ of 2011. The ban on such religious symbols was lifted post-2011, however, after the terror attack of 2015, there were calls to re-impose the ban on the niqab.

Hussain Ali lynched by women in Assam village after he raped a woman and a minor at the pretext of administering ‘traditional healing’

Man identified as Hussain Ali (45), who hailed from Raikata Sandanpur of Hojai district has allegedly been lynched by the women of an Assam village, West Karbi Anglong district, on Thursday after he was caught molesting 2 women at the pretext of administering ‘traditional medication’ to them.

Allegedly, on July 1st, he had visited the village to ‘heal’ a woman who was blind in one eye. He had left after performing some rituals and said that he would be back.

Mrinal Talukdar, superintendent of police, West Karbi Anglong said, “On July 3, he went to the same house and after conducting some rituals took the woman’s 22-year-old daughter to a separate room to perform some more treatment, saying it will cure her mother’s blindness”.

After making the woman smell some substance that made her unconscious, Hussain Ali proceeded to rape her.

In fact, he went back the following day and raped a 16-year-old relative of the woman he had raped the previous day. “Ali turned up at the house again on Thursday…. Saying he needed to conduct the rituals again, he took a 16-year-old relative of the woman inside the house and raped her in a similar manner”, said Mrinal Talukdar, superintendent of police, West Karbi Anglong.

According to Assam Tribunal, Hussain Ali received grievous injuries and was rushed to the hospital but succumbed to his injuries eventually. The SP informed the media that a case has been registered in this connection.

Whoever tries to come between me and my brother will be slain by Sudarshan Chakra: Tej Pratap Yadav

The absence of Tejashwi Yadav from the 23rd Foundation day celebrations of the Rashtriya Janta Dal (RJD) today prompted the speculations about a rift in the Yadav family. Former CM of Bihar and RJD Chief Lalu Prasad Yadav’s wife Rabri Debi and their elder son Tej Pratap Yadav were the only members present from the Yadav family.  While Lalu Yadav is serving his sentence in jail in Fodder Scam, Tejasvi Yadav’s absence was unexplained.

Speaking at the event, Tej Pratap Yadav tried to damp down the speculations and clarified that he was sent to the event by his brother Tejashwi Yadav only. He said that the rivals of the RJD are spreading rumours of a split between him and his brother. Comparing himself and Tejashwi to Lord Krishna and Arjuna respectively, Tej Pratap said that whoever would try to come between him and his brother would be slain by the Sudarshan Chakra (Lord Krishna’s weapon).

RJD Foundation Day

Remembering his father and  Fodder scam convict Lalu Prasad Yadav, Tej Pratap urged the party workers to make efforts to bring his father out of jail. He said that his father has been falsely implicated in the Fodder scam case. He called for a movement to spread the ideology of his father and named it as LP movement (Lalu Prasad movement) on the lines of JP movement (Jay Prakash Narayan movement).

Tej Pratap always finds ways to remain in the news. In the month of April this year, he had reportedly decided to launch ‘Lalu Rabri Morcha’ after resigning from the Youth Wing of RJD. He had also announced that he would contest from the Saran seat as an independent candidate even if an RJD candidate is fielded from the seat.

External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar and BJP leader Jugalji Thakor win Rajya Sabha bypoll from Gujarat

BJP candidates, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar and OBC leader Jugal Thakor, have won the bypolls to two Rajya Sabha seats from Gujarat conducted today. At present BJP has 76 members in the Upper House and with this victory, the number has gone up to 78.

The voting for two seats was held between 9 am and 4 pm while the counting was done at 5 pm.


BJP president Amit Shah and Union Minister of Textiles Smriti Irani, who were Rajya Sabha MPs from Gujarat, were elected to the Lok Sabha in the recently concluded general elections. They had resigned from their upper house membership following their election to the lower house, and it had left two seats vacant in the upper house, making it necessary to conduct these bypolls.

While BJP fielded S Jaishankar and Thakor, Congress had nominated Chandrika Chudasama and Gaurav Pandya against the two.

BJP has 100 MLA’s in Gujrat assembly while Congress has 71 MLAs in the 182-member assembly. Given the strength of the number of representatives, BJP was in a formidable position to sweep these bypolls. Out of the total 182 MLAs, 175 legislators were set to exercise their voting rights including one independent, one from NCP and two from Bharatiya Tribal Party.

The elections on each of these seats were held independently, the candidates had to earn a comfortable 50 percent votes to win.


As per reports, three MLAs who were disqualified could not cast their votes.

At present, four seats in the assembly lie vacant after sitting MLAs, who got elected to the Lok Sabha, resigned from their seats.

While the voting for the bypolls was underway in Gandhinagar, Congress MLAs, who were whisked away to Banaskantha resort for a ‘shivir’ in a bid to stop horsetrading, returned to Gandhinagar this morning to cast their votes.

Supreme Court trashes Rana Ayyub’s Gujarat book, says it is based upon surmises, conjectures, and suppositions

A writ petition seeking fresh investigation into the Haren Pandya case had used controversial journalist Rana Ayyub’s book in support of their case, which the Supreme Court today said that is of no utility. The Supreme Court of India today overturned a Gujarat High Court order which had acquitted the 12 people convicted of murdering former Gujarat Home Minister Haren Pandya in 2003. The apex court restored the judgement of the trial court, which had convicted and sentenced Md Asgar Ali and 11 others.

CBI had appealed against the Gujarat High Court order in the Supreme Court, and a bench of Justice Arun Mishra accepted the appeal. Along with the appeal, the apex court also heads a writ petition filed by Centre for Public Interest Litigation in association with the case. The legal NGO had sought fresh investigation into the murder of Haren Pandya, on the basis that High Court had acquitted the accused persons, and thereby raising doubt on the correctness of investigation which had led to the trial court verdict.

Along with overturning the high court order, the Supreme Court also rejected this writ petition seeking fresh investigation into the case. The judgement of the apex court notes that the petitioners had submitted the book ‘Gujarat Files – Anatomy of a coverup’ written by journalist Rana Ayyub in support of its case. Based upon this book and some other articles published in various newspapers advocates Shanti Bhushan and Prashant Bhushan had argued that it is a fit case for further investigation.

From SC order on Haren Pandya

But the Supreme Court found no merit in the evidence submitted by the petitioners. The bench said, “The Book by Rana Ayyub is of no utility. It is based upon surmises, conjectures, and suppositions and has no evidentiary value”. Implying that the arguments made by Rana Ayyub in her book are her opinions, the court said that “The opinion of a person is not in the realm of the evidence.”

Most importantly, the judgement says that there is a likelihood of it being politically motivated, which cannot be ruled out. “The way in which the things have moved in Gujarat post-Godhra incident, such allegations and counter-allegations are not uncommon and had been raised a number of times and have been found to be untenable and afterthought”, the court notes.

Giving the verdict that Rana Ayyub’s book does not have evidentiary value, the court said that no case is made out on the basis of the material placed by petitioners including the Book by Rana Ayyub.

Dismissing the writ petition, the Supreme Court also imposed a fine of ₹50,000 on the petitioners.


It may be noted that this is not the first time Rana Ayyub’s book on Gujarat was criticised for not being based on facts. Even the anti-BJP propaganda site Tehelka had refused to publish the same story by the journalist. Dismissing allegations that Rana’s story was not published due to political pressure, editor Choudhury had said that it was not published as it did not meet editorial standards of the publication.