Home Blog Page 2111

West Bengal: Mamata Banerjee’s nephew and TMC MP Abhishek Banerjee questioned by CBI in SSC teachers recruitment scam

Mamata Banerjee’s nephew and national general secretary of Trinamool Congress continues to face trouble in the ongoing recruitment scam case in West Bengal. Today he appeared before the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) at its Kolkata office this morning, where he had been called as part of the agency’s probe into the school jobs scam.

He travelled to the agency’s offices at Nizam Palace, where there was a lot of security in place, at 10:58 in the morning, and went to the personnel tasked with investigating the scandal.

Sujay Krishna Bhadra’s residence was raided earlier in the day by the Enforcement Directorate as part of its investigation into the school employment scam.  He is considered to be close to TMC’s top brass. The raid was conducted at the Behala house of  ‘Kalighat er Kaku’s’ (Kalighat’s uncle) as he is popularly known.

He had testified before the CBI on March 15 regarding his alleged participation in wrongful appointments made in several state-run and state-aided institutions in the state.

The Enforcement Directorate is investigating the money trail connected to the anomalies in the recruitment at schools while the CBI is looking into the criminal component of the fraud.

The MP from Diamond Harbour who was campaigning in the western city of Bankura, hurried back to Kolkata on Friday night to respond to the central investigating agency’s summons.

A letter sent by a deputy superintendent of the CBI to Abhishek Banerjee’s Harish Mukherjee Road address on Friday directed the latter to appear before him on Saturday, at 11 am.

Later on Friday, the TMC leader dared the central agency to arrest him if it had any evidence of corruption or wrongdoing against him in a speech he made from atop his vehicle. Abhishek Banerjee remarked, “I dare the CBI to arrest me if they have any proof of corruption against me,” during a gathering in Bankura.

On Thursday, the Calcutta High Court rejected his plea seeking the recall of a prior judgement of the court authorising the CBI and ED to interrogate him about the teacher recruitment fraud.

His name appeared in a complaint put out by Kuntal Ghosh, one of the scam’s accused. The authorities, according to the latter, put pressure on him to implicate Abhishek Banerjee in the school fraud case.

On Friday, his efforts to have a division bench and then the chief justice of the Calcutta High Court hear his revision case were unsuccessful. The case may now be heard by a High Court vacation bench, which will convene on Monday.

Notably, he was previously summoned by the CBI on April 17, however, the member of parliament pointed out that the High Court’s order was nullified by the Supreme Court and accused the BJP of ‘harassing’ him through central agencies. He is currently on his ‘Jono Sanjog Yatra’ since April 25 and said that the march will resume on May 22 from his current location in Bankura. 

Additionally, he protested in a letter to the CBI on Saturday that he had not been given enough time to abandon the state-wide public outreach programme he was carrying out in rural West Bengal.

Sources within the organisation revealed that he was questioned by a four-person CBI team starting at 11.30 am. The whole session was videotaped, and the leader’s answers were recorded and countersigned.

The probing team comprised Wasim Akram, the CBI’s investigating official along with three of the special investigation team’s seven members, who were officers of the levels of Superintendent of Police (SP), Deputy superintendent of Police (DSP) and Inspector of Police.

Three TMC leaders, MLA from Nadia district, Manik Bhattacharya, MLA from Burdwan constituency, Jiban Krishna Saha and former education minister, Partha Chatterjee have already been arrested in the case so far. 

 

As the Centre brings ordinance to amend the GNCTD act, read how it has a legal basis in Supreme Court’s judgment itself

On Friday (May 19), the Centre issued an ordinance [pdf], which effectively reinstates the power of the Lieutenant Governor (LG) over ‘administrative services’ in the Delhi government (also called GNCTD).

The ordinance, which has now been approved by the President of India, empowers the LG to oversee the posting, transfer, and disciplinary proceedings against officers of the Delhi government

This has been done through the constitution of a new ‘National Capital Civil Services Authority’, which will include the Delhi Chief Minister, Chief Secretary, and Home Secretary of the Delhi government.

As per the ordinance, the ‘Authority’ headed by the Delhi CM will recommend the Lieutenant Governor on the transfer and posting of officers serving in the Delhi government. The recommendations will however need the approval of the LG.

The Lieutenant Governor has also been given the power to send the recommendations back to National Capital Civil Services Authority for reconsideration. “Provided also that in case of difference of opinion, the decision of the Lieutenant Governor shall be final,” the Ordinance made it clear.

“Notwithstanding anything contained in any judgment, order or decree of any Court, the Legislative Assembly shall have the power to make laws as per Article 239AA except with respect to any matter enumerated in Entry 41 of List II of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution of India or any matter connected therewith or incidental thereto,” it emphasised.

The Background of the Controversy

On May 11, 2023, a five-judge Constitution bench led by Chief Justice of India (CJI) DY Chandrachud pronounced the verdict in the Government of NCT of Delhi vs Union of India case [pdf].

The apex court ruled that the Delhi government has both executive and legislative power over ‘administrative services’ in the National Capital. However, It noted that GNTCD cannot exercise its powers in matters related to police, land and public order. At the same time, the apex court stated that the Lieutenant Governor is bound by the decisions of the Delhi government.

“Under Entry 41 List 2, the Lieutenant Governor shall be bound by the decisions of GNCTD on services as explained above. To clarify, any reference to Lieutenant Governor over Services excluding services relating to public order, Police and land in relevant rules shall mean Lieutenant Governor acting on behalf of NCTD,” the Supreme Court ruled.

CJI DY Chandrachud even stated, “If a democratically elected government is not given the power to control the officers, the principle of triple chain of accountability will be redundant.”

He continued, “If the officers stop reporting to the Ministers or do not abide by their directions, the principle of collective responsibility is affected.” The CJI further added that if the officers felt they were insulated from the control of the government that would dilute accountability and affect governance.

Legal basis of the Ordinance by the Centre

It must be mentioned that the Union government can bring in an Ordinance (a law that can make legislative changes) when the Parliament is not in session and immediate action is required on a matter. However, it must be passed by the Parliament within 6 weeks (42 days) of the commencement of the next session or it will lapse.

While there is a hullabaloo over the ordinance issued by the Centre, reinstating the power of LG over ‘administrative issues’, it must be mentioned that such a provision was made in the Government of NCT of Delhi vs Union of India verdict of the Supreme court.

In Part C, Section 20 of the Judgment copy, it is clearly stated –

The judgment of the majority, however, clarified that if Parliament makes a law in relation to any subject in List II and List III, the executive power of GNCTD shall then be limited by the law enacted by Parliament.

Again in Part I, Section 95 of the verdict, it has been made clear –

“…If Parliament enacts a law granting executive power on any subject which is within the domain of NCTD, the executive power of the Lieutenant Governor shall be modified to the extent, as provided in that law. Furthermore, under Section 49 of the GNCTD Act, the Lieutenant Governor and the Council of Ministers must comply with the particular directions issued by the President on specific occasions.

Moreover, Article 239AA of the Indian Constitution provided an assembly to Delhi to address local aspirations and was not intended to give complete control of the Union Territory to the Delhi government (over the existing control of the Union Government).

Non-bailable warrant issued against younger son of Mukhtar Ansari: Read why

The trouble for Mukhtar Ansari, the jailed mafia-turned-politician, is only about to get worse, as a non-bailable warrant has been issued against his younger son Umar Ansari for failing to appear in court on Friday (May 19). The order was passed when the court was hearing cases pertaining to the violation of the model code of conduct registered in Mau during the 2022 assembly elections.

In this case, the police had filed two separate complaints in Nagar Kotwali against Mau Sadar MLA Abbas Ansari and his younger brother Umar Ansari, as well as nine other people. Charges against all these accused were to be framed in the trial in the MP MLA court of Mau on Friday.

During the proceedings of the court, Abbas Ansari appeared through video conferencing from Kasganj Jail. The rest of the accused were present in the court in person. Umar Ansari, the younger son of Mukhtar Ansari, however, remained absent from the court.

Chief Judicial Magistrate MP / MLA Court Shweta Chowdhary issued a non-bailable warrant against Umar Ansari in his absence and fixed June 2, 2023, as the next date for the hearing.

It is pertinent to note here that Umar Ansari has six ongoing cases against him. Four cases concern violations of the model code of conduct, while the other two cases concern cheating and hate speech. Four cases are registered in the Mau police stations, whereas the other two are registered in Ghazipur and Lucknow. Chargesheets have been filed in all six cases and trial has begun.

Notably, Umar Ansari is the younger son of mafia-turned-politician Mukhtar Ansari, who was elected from the Mau Assembly constituency for five consecutive terms. For the last more than 15 years, this former ‘lawmaker’ – ill-known more for breaking the laws rather than making one – is lodged in jail.

In April and May, the OpIndia team conducted an investigation tour into the criminal record of Mukhtar Ansari, a notorious mafia who has been leading criminal activities in Uttar Pradesh for many years. During this period, we spoke with several individuals who had been victims of Mukhtar’s atrocities, each sharing their unique experiences. In addition to being implicated in cases involving murder, attempted murder, land grabbing, and extortion, Mukhtar Ansari also faces allegations of tampering with files related to the charges filed against him, causing them to go missing.

It is pertinent to note that Ghazipur MP/MLA Court sentenced Mukhtar Ansari to 10 years imprisonment and imposed a Rs 5 lakh fine for his involvement in BJP MLA Krishnanand Rai’s murder case in 2005.

Furthermore, Mukhtar Ansari’s brother and BSP MP Afzal Ansari was also sentenced to 4 years imprisonment in the same case and is set to lose his MP seat.

Mukhtar Ansari’s wife Afsha Ansari is wanted in various criminal cases, including ones under the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act (Gangster Act). It is pertinent to note that there is a Rs 75,000 reward for Afsha Ansari.

The Uttar Pradesh Police is conducting raids to trace gangster-turned-politician and former BSP MLA Mukhtar Ansari’s wife and son concerning ongoing criminal cases against them.

20% TCS on international credit cards: What it is, why it was needed, and how it will impact foreign visits – everything you needed to know

A new rule introduced by the finance ministry over the use of credit cards has created quite a storm, which introduces 20% TCS (Tax Collected at Source) over the use of credit cards for international purchases. This was done by including the foreign spending on credit cards in the RBI’s liberalised remittance scheme (LRS).

On 16 May, the ministry issued a gazette notification, which said that rule 7 of the Foreign Exchange Management (Current Account Transactions) Rules, 2000 has been omitted. Rule 7 of the FEMA (CAT) Rules, 2000 had said, “Nothing contained in rule 5 shall apply to the use of International Credit Card for making payment by a person towards meeting expenses while such person is on a visit outside India.” This means, under rule 7, the usage of international credit cards for making payments for fulfilling expenses during travel outside India was not included in the LRS limit earlier, but now they will be included in the same as the exemption granted to international credit card payments has been withdrawn.

Under the liberalised remittance scheme of the RBI, Indian residents are allowed to remit up to $250,000 per year without any prior approval from the RBI. Earlier, only debit cards, forex cards, and bank transfers were included in the LRS, and now credit card payments are also allowed under LRS.

But this has also meant that there will be a tax collected at source (TCS) on international credit card payments. The rate of TCS will be 20% from July 1, while the same will, be 5% from now till July 1. The TCS amount thus paid will be refunded by the government after the user files the tax return after the end of the financial year and is eligible for such returns.

While initially not known, the finance ministry also clarified later that the TCS will not be applicable to transactions. It will be applicable only if the expenses on a credit card in foreign countries cross ₹7 lakh in a year.

It is notable that Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) and Tax Collected at Source (TCS) are different. TDS is deducted from earnings, like salary, interest and other payments received, while TCS is collected at the time of spending money to make purchases etc. However, the TCS is different from other taxes paid at the time of purchase, like GST and excise. For end consumers, GST and excise are essentially part of the price which can’t be reclaimed, while businesses can claim credit for GST. On the other hand, TCS is linked to an individual’s PAN and it can be claimed back while filing the income tax return, and therefore it is not a final tax payment.

Justifying the move, the finance minister has said that “due to the exemption under erstwhile Rule 7, expenditures through credit cards were not accounted for under the specified LRS limit, which has led to some individuals exceeding the LRS limits.”

According to the clarification issued, “data collected from top money emitters under LRS reveals that international credit cards are being issued with limits in excess of the present LRS limit of USD 2,50,000. The differential treatment between debit cards and credit cards needed to be removed in the interest of uniformity and equity in the treatment of modes of drawl of foreign exchange and for capturing total expenditures under LRS for prudent foreign exchange management and to prevent by-passing of LRS limits.”

The ministry said that the RBI has written to the govt several times asking to remove the differential treatment of debit cards and credit cards.

The introduction of TCS on international credit card payments has created a lot of backlash on social media, across political circles. Just like many other decisions of the finance ministry, this decision is also being criticised by traditional BJP supporters on social media, apart from the opposition. Apart from criticism, many people also raised questions seeking clarification on the impact of this new rule.

The finance ministry issued a clarification on 17 May in an attempt to address the concerns raised by people. While it did address some concerns, some were left unanswered. Here is an attempt to break down the entire matter in simple terms, and address some concerns raised on social media.

What is the change

The abolition of rule 7 of the FEMA (CAT) Rules, 2000 means that credit card payments made while travelling abroad will attract 20% TCS. This means every international spent using a credit card will increase the outgo by 20%, a considerable increase in expense.

It is important to note that the TCS was already applicable if payment was made using debit cards or other methods, and only credit card payments were exempt. Now that exemption has been withdrawn.

However, as explained above, this is not a final tax payment, and it can be reclaimed, and the amount paid can be adjusted with overall income tax liability while filing the income tax return. Just like TDS, the TCS amounts paid by a taxpayer are also reflected in Form 26AS issued by the income tax department, and the same can be used in filing the ITR.

Yesterday the Finance Ministry amended the change, setting a threshold of ₹7 lakh in a year for the applicability of the TCS. Therefore, the TCS will be collected on international credit card uses only if the payment amount exceeds ₹7 lakh in a financial year.

The notification by the ministry said, “to avoid any procedural ambiguity, it has been decided that any payments by an individual using their international Debit or Credit cards upto Rs 7 lakh per financial year will be excluded from the LRS limits and hence, will not attract any TCS.”

This comes as a big relief for people who do not spend much on credit cards during their travel abroad. The ₹7 lakh limit should cover most expenses by regular travellers, and if the flight and hotels are booked using Indian tour operators, the entire amount of ₹7 lakh could be used for other spends like shopping and entertainment without requiring to pay 20% tax.

Why it was needed

Several people have argued that credit card payments are already documented as they go through the networks of credit card companies and banking systems, and therefore there is no need to impose the TCS to trace high-value foreign transactions using credit card. Many people are also arguing that the govt’s justification of introducing the TCS to curb money laundering is wrong, as nobody uses credit card to launder money or for any illegal transactions.

While these are basically fair arguments, there some issues, as explained by finance ministry officials. According to data collected by RBI from top money remitters under the LRS has revealed that many people were using credit cards to make international remittances over the $2,50,000 limit. The Reserve Bank of India has been requesting the finance ministry to withdraw the exemption given to credit cards, and to bring them at par with debit cards and payment instruments.

Moreover, the difference between debit and credit cards in this regard was required to be removed to bring uniformity and equity between them. This was needed obtain the total expenditures made under LRS so that the foreign exchange management can be improved. The exemption for credit cards also provided a loophole to bypass the LRS limit, which needed to be plugged.

According to finance ministry sources that OpIndia talked to, several instances were discovered where disproportionately high payments under LRS were made compared to disclosed incomes. Analysis of the credit card spends abroad showed that several high-net-worth individuals were remitting amounts much more than the LRS limit of $2,50,000 (over ₹2 crore), by using credit cards issued in the names of different members of a family. For example, if a family has 5 credit cards, they were able to remit ₹10 crore in total, far exceeding the LRS limit.

The total remittance from India in the year 2021-22 was ₹19.61 billion under LRS, up from $12.68 billion, and it rose to e to 24 billion in 2022-23.

Why 20%

A very common question is being asked is that if the reason to bring credit cards under LRS was to trace high spends, what was the need to impose 20% tax, as the same purpose could be fulfilled by imposing a 1% tax also. This will lessen the impact on the individuals and will left more money in their hands to spend, it is being argued.

To this, the ministry has responded by saying that the rate of 20% is comparable to prevailing income tax rates. If the person using credit card abroad is not a taxpayer, then the 20% tax on the card spends abroad will not be very high for the presumed income of the individual. In the current income tax slabs, the income tax rate of 20% is applicable for taxable income above ₹12 lakh, and the same is 30% for taxable income above 30%.

Generally, only high-income individuals use the RBI’s Liberalised Remittance Scheme, and they fall in the highest slab of tax, which is 30%. The rate of 20% has been fixed considering these aspects. The TCS paid on international credit card spends can be treated as advance tax paid.

Honest taxpayers punished more?

A common argument against any new tax proposal is that they tend to punish honest taxpayers, leaving tax evaders out of the net. The same argument is also being made in this case.

To this, the ministry has said that the change to the rule is part of a larger policy-based approach to prevent bypassing the LRS limits using credit cards, and to trace individuals who are remitting high amounts of money using this method. Therefore, this rule is designed to catch those who are violating the rules of remittance.

The TCS on credit card spends abroad will mainly impact investments by HNIs in foreign countries, in instruments such as real estate, shares, bonds etc, and will not impact common people who use the cards in shopping and travelling. While there will be no TCS upto ₹7 lakh, any tax paid on spend beyond that limit can be claimed while filing the ITR.

It also does not limit the credit card use of individuals by bringing it under LRS, as the Liberalised Remittance Scheme (LRS) limit at over ₹2 crore per year is already quite high. It will not impact low and middle-income individuals; only upper-income earners will be most impacted by this limit on their credit card spending abroad.

The liquidity issue

Several people are arguing that even if one can reclaim the amount, it locks the amount for a considerable amount of time. If someone uses credit card to make international payment at the beginning of the financial year, the TCS amount gets locked for over a year, till the ITR is filed in the next FY, and the amount is credited by the department. It is being argued that it creates a liquidity problem as the cash gets stuck with the government.

It is true that any TCS collected will be refunded only after the financial year is over, which means it is true that the money will be stuck for a period ranging from a couple of months to over a year.

However, taxpayers can reduce their advance tax payments by the TCS amount so paid. Similarly, salaried taxpayers can get their TDS deduction reduced to that extent. As a result, the impact of the TCS collected can be neutralised.

Foreign visits paid by employer

A large number of foreign visits are business trips paid for by companies, and the TCS rule will not apply to the amount spent by the companies in such visits. This means, where a business pays the costs of air travel, hotel bills, and any other expenses using the company’s credit card, there will be no TCS on the same.

This is because international expenses made by businesses are treated as residual current account transactions outside the LRS limit. Companies may be allowed such payments without any limit, provided it is verified to be a bona fide transaction.

However, for any expense done using personal credit cards during such official foreign visits, such as shopping, eating, or any expense not paid by the employer, the TCS will be applicable, if the total spend exceeds ₹7 lakh.

The ministry will frame appropriate rules for remittance by corporate entities in due course of time. The ease of doing business principles will be kept in mind while making the rules, the ministry officials have assured.

What happens to subscriptions

A major concern among many is whether this TCS will be applicable to payments made to foreign entities for online purchases, such as streaming content, data services, web services and similar purchases. Many Indians subscribe to foreign streaming services, media houses etc.

Similarly, individuals and businesses pay foreign vendors for web hosting, domain services, cloud computing, productivity suits and many other online services, and many of them only accept credit cards. Individuals and businesses also purchase goods from outside India using credit cards. It is a concern among many that the TCS will have a negative impact on such businesses.

However, the finance ministry has clarified that the TCS will not be applicable to credit card payments made in India, even if they are paid to foreign entities. There will be no TCS on subscriptions or purchase of content, software, games or streaming services using credit cards. Similarly, there will be no TCS on goods ordered from foreign countries using credit cards.

It is also notable that many of the online service providers, like Amazon Web Services, Azure Cloud Services, Google Workplace etc now accept payments in Indian currency.

Medical & educational expenses

The finance ministry has clarified that the status quo prevails for medical and educational expenses made abroad, which means the 20% TCS will not be applicable to credit card payments abroad for medical and educational expenses.

However, a detailed guideline from the ministry in this regard is awaited, as it needs to be clarified how such expenses will be verified. It is expected that the people will have to be careful in making payments to healthcare or educational instructions abroad, as they will need to make sure that such institutions are recognised by the Income Tax Department so that the 20% tax is not collected.

How to avoid the 20% TCS

While the TCS will applicable to all uses of credit card during foreign travel if the use crosses ₹7 lakh, it can be avoided with a little planning. The TCS is applicable only if the payment is made outside India. Therefore, if the travellers book their flights and hotels using Indian tour operators such as MakeMyTrip, Agoda, Goibibo etc, and make payments using credit cards, there will be no TCS on such payments.

In conclusion, while new tax proposals are never popular, the govt has clarified that this was needed to curb the illegal remittance of money by misusing credit cards due to the exemption. However, with the ₹7 lakh threshold, this will not impact most travellers, and only a small number of HNIs who use credit cards to make large purchases and investments in foreign countries will be impacted.

Karnataka: 8 ministers to be sworn in along with CM Siddaramaiah and deputy CM DK Shivakumar, party president Kharge’s son among the chosen ones

After Congress’ stunning victory in the recently concluded Karnataka elections, followed by the tussle over the chief ministerial position, party president Mallikarjun Kharge today approved the first list of eight Cabinet Ministers in the state government. The development was confirmed hours ahead of the swearing-in ceremony in Bengaluru.

Siddaramaiah, the chief minister-designate of Karnataka, and DK Shivakumar, the deputy chief minister-designate, reportedly shortlisted names of ministers and their portfolios after discussing the modalities of forming the state’s cabinet with the party leadership in Delhi on Friday night.

G Parameshwara, KH Muniyappa, KJ George, MB Patil, Satish Jarkiholi, Priyank Kharge (AICC President Mallikarjun Kharge’s son), Ramalinga Reddy, and BZ Zameer Ahmed Khan will take the oath of office along with Siddaramaiah and DK Shivakumar.

“Today is the swearing-in ceremony of the Chief Minister, Deputy Chief Minister, and eight MLAs who will take oath as the ministers (in the state cabinet), everyone is attending it. I am going for the same. It is a matter of delight that a new and strong Congress government has come to power in Karnataka. This will benefit Karnataka, and it is creating a good environment in the country,” informed Mallikarjun Kharge.

At the swearing-in event, which is taking place from 12.30 PM at Sree Kanteerava Stadium, Governor Thawarchand Gehlot will administer the oath of office and secrecy to the chief minister and his cabinet. Siddaramaiah took oath here in 2013 as well, when he became chief minister for the first time.

Mallikarjun Kharge has invited the leaders of various like-minded parties including Farooq Abdullah-led National Conference, Mehbooba Mufti-led Jammu and Kashmir Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Akhilesh Yadav-led Samajwadi Party, Jayant Chaudhary-led Rashtriya Lok Dal (RLD), Janata Dal-United, Rashtriya Janata Dal and Mamata Banerjee-led Trinamool Congress among others to the occasion. The gathering might serve as an opposition party show of force as they once again try to work together to defeat the BJP in the 2024 Lok Sabha elections.

The Congress had triumphed in Karnataka assembly polls by winning 135 out of 224 seats in the southern state while the ruling BJP was reduced to 66 seats. The results of the May 10 assembly elections were announced on May 13.

Bihar: Shabana Khatoon marries Abhishek Kumar, seeks police protection due to threats to her husband and his family from Islamists

A Muslim girl from the Muzaffarpur district of Bihar has been receiving threats after she married a Hindu man. The girl named Shabana Khatoon, who is an adult, has alleged that there is a threat to her and her husband’s lives from the Islamists. The girl has stated that she wants to stay with her Hindu husband Abhishek Kumar. She had eloped with her lover 42 days back. Following this, the girl’s family members filed a kidnapping case against the Hindu man and five members of his family including his parents. 

Reportedly, the matter pertains to the Ahiyapur police station precinct in Muzaffarpur district, wherein a Shahbazpur resident named Shabana Khatoon stated that she had known Abhishek for four years, adding that Abhishek was her neighbour and the two soon became friends. Later, the two decided on getting married and told their families about their relationship. 

This, however, did not go well with Shabana’s father Noor Mohammad who opposed their relationship since Abhishek is a Hindu. He also stopped his daughter from meeting Abhishek. However, during the month of Ramzan, Shabana escaped to Delhi with Abhishek. After Shabana left, her family filed a complaint against Abhishek and five members of his family accusing them of kidnapping Shabana. On the basis of their complaint, police began searching for her. Meanwhile, Abhishek and Shabana had a court marriage at Delhi’s Tees Hazari Court. 

Speaking to the media, Shabana told that there is a threat to her life, that of her husband, and her family members and also demanded protection from the police. She said that she and Abhishek knew each other for 4 years, and after a relationship developed between them, they decided to marry. But her family didn’t agree as Abhishekh is a Hindu.

She said that after getting married at Tees Hazari Court in Delhi, she has approached the police station because the lives of her husband and his family are under threat, and therefore require police protection. She confirmed that the kidnapping case filed by her parents is false, and she went with the Hindu man of her own will.

Deputy SP Raghav Dayal stated that Shabana is an adult who entered into a court marriage with Abhishek of her own free will based on the information provided by the girl. According to the DSP, the girl in her statement under 164 of the CrPC given to the magistrate has stated that she married Abhishek of her own free will and wants to stay with him. The police added that she has finished documents proving that she is above 18 years of age and can marry on her own will.

Madhya Pradesh: Faizan Khan threatens to kill his Hindu girlfriend and her family for not converting to Islam

A new incident of love jihad has emerged from the Khajrana police station area in Indore, Madhya Pradesh. The accused, Mohammad Faizan Khan son of Farid Khan, and resident of Haroon Colony Khajrana, befriended a girl who lives in Nanda Nagar, in a coaching class and engaged in physical relations with her on the pretext of marriage.

Later, Faizan started pressurizing the girl to accept Islam and when she refused, he started fighting with her. Faizan warned her of dire repercussions and threatened to kill her, her brother, and her mother. The police have already registered a case under sections of rape and the MP Religious Freedom Act.

The victim stated in the complaint that she first met Mohammad Faizan Khan in coaching classes around four years ago. He befriended her, coaxed her to change her house and when she started living alone, he established sexual relations with her under the pretext of marriage.

The victim reported that he started pestering her to embrace Islam after a few days. On May 18, he told her to tell him straight away whether she is going to accept Islam or not. He beat her and threatened to kill her if she didn’t become a Muslim. He also made death threats against her mother and brother. Now, a case has been lodged and an investigation is underway.

Another instance in the city’s Lasudia neighbourhood has also come to light. Here, a man by the name of Shahadat Mansuri abducted and sexually assaulted a minor. The victim’s father filed a complaint against the accused at the police station as soon as he learned about the incident.

The girl charged that the culprit first seduced her and then forcibly had sex with her. The offender was then identified by the police and the stringent section of rape was invoked against him.

Delhi doctor falls prey to cyber fraud, duped of Rs 4.5 crores: Read what happened

A Delhi woman doctor became a victim of what is being seen as the biggest phishing scam on an individual in Delhi to date. According to a report by TOI, some fraudsters claiming to be from Maharashtra Narcotics Department duped the doctor of Rs 4.47 crores.

The fraudsters posed as police officials from the Andheri police station, RBI officials, a DCP from Mumbai Police, customs sleuths, and Narcotics division cops in order to defraud the victim.

The 34-year-old woman doctor was told that a large quantity of MDMA drug has been detected in a FedEx courier linked to her. The fraudsters took the victim on a Skype call and a web of lies was spun around her to deceive her. She was coerced into ‘temporarily’ handing over the entire money in her account.

The woman who fell right into the trap laid by the fraudsters landed up losing a whopping sum of Rs 4.5 crores.

Narrating the sequence of events which led to her falling right into the trap laid by the fraudsters, the victim told TOI that it started with her receiving a call on May 5, Friday at 10.39 am from an unknown number regarding her FedEx parcel that had been ‘seized.’ She was asked to dial 1 to get more details about what actually happened.

The victim said that the caller claimed the parcel consists of her passport, two pair of shoes, bank documents, clothes, and 140 grams of MDMA. The fraudsters claimed that the parcel was to go from Mumbai to Taiwan and was booked on April 21, 2023, and a charge of Rs 25,025 plus GST was paid via an ICICI credit card.

The woman denied having any knowledge of the courier. The callers then asked her to register a complaint with the Andheri police station and directed her call to ‘Inspector’ Smita Patel from Andheri East Police Station. Since the victim was in Delhi, inspector Patil suggested she file a complaint online. She was asked to download the Skype app.

Scamsters intimidated the Delhi woman doctor by claiming her ID was used to open 23 bank accounts in Mumbai and was flagged for money laundering

The fraudster posing as Inspector Patil called the victim on Skype. The victim revealed how the so-called inspector pretended to talk to her colleague to find out whether her Aadhar was being misused.  The victim said she overheard the person on the other side claiming that her ID was used to open 23 bank accounts in Mumbai and was flagged for money laundering.

The victim recalled that the so-called inspector then threatened her saying that she would be investigated for multiple criminal offences. She told her that she would be put under arrest.

The victim was then ordered to provide screenshots of all her bank accounts with balances and to reveal all of her financial information down to the last rupee. Left completely flabbergasted and devastated by what was happening to her, she kept following the instructions and shared these screenshots via Skype.

The fraudsters then directed her to break her fixed deposits in order for them to be seized and verified. The woman first broke her FD worth Rs 1.15 crore and then was asked to go to the branch at Gopinath Bazar for breaking the rest. The woman was also told not to involve others, including her husband because they would be considered accomplices to the crime.

Following that, another cop claiming to be DCP Bal Singh Rajput took over the conversation and requested her to fill out RTGS papers. She was also routed to a new Skype ID allegedly belonging to the “Maharashtra narcotics division.” Another official, purportedly from the Reserve Bank of India, also joined in.

Scamsters sent complaint on the letterhead of the Mumbai Police to convince their legitimacy

The woman was told that the money in her account, which they said was the proceeds of crime, would be transferred to RBI and then returned after verification. Along with a letter from the RBI, she received a complaint on the letterhead of the Mumbai Police. The woman was then forced to make a Rs 1 crore RTGS transaction and share a screenshot with the swindlers. She later sent another Rs 90 lakh.

The woman was compelled to take her husband’s signatures, break the joint FDs, and then transfer the money to them. She was told to sit back and wait for the RBI to issue a clearance report on whether the money was legitimate.

The victim further stated that the fraudsters told her that they would grant her a new Aadhar ID because her old one had been permanently disabled. They also asked her to delete all of her Skype interactions.

The woman waited until May 9 convinced that the money was not drug money, but the “Mumbai narcotics division” never reverted. “RBI and Andheri police stations” also vanished from the scene.

Finally, the woman was given two “clearance certificates” confirming that her accounts were in order and that no unlawful activities had been identified.

Realising that she had fallen prey to cyber fraud, the woman doctor approached the Delhi police, which in turn, filed an FIR and started investigating the issue.

Online scams, often known as internet scams, have been an issue since the early days of the internet, but they have become more prevalent over time, with scammers constantly developing new ways to defraud people. Worryingly, our smartphones have increased our vulnerability to these attacks. In an attempt to collect financial or other vital personal information, cybercriminals may approach potential victims via personal or business email accounts, social networking sites, dating apps, or other techniques. Many effective online scams have the same outcome: the victim loses their money.

In January this year, we reported about a Twitter user Geetika Rustagi who also narrated how she fell prey to one such online scam.

“Only God can save Bathinda”: High alert in Punjab after letters threaten multiple blasts on June 7

Police stations in the Bathinda district of Punjab have been put on high alert after receiving six letters threatening bomb blasts in the district on June 7. SSP Gurneet Singh said that these letters have been sent to politicians, officers and traders through post. 

The handwritten letter also mentions the name of ten locations where the bomb blast will be carried out, namely, Quila, railway station, Adesh Hospital, SSP office at the mini secretariat, Bathinda jail, ITI flyover, Mittal Mall, new car parking, Nirankari Bhawan and the farmers’ protest site. The letter stated that the explosives for the attack have been deployed and only “god can save Bathinda”. It further read that the recent Amritsar blasts were just a trailer. SSP Singh said that an FIR has been registered and the persons who wrote the threat letter will soon be arrested.

Bomb threat letter (Image via Bhaskar)

SSP Singh has directed the police to search every nook and corner of the district. Every area, vehicle, and individual will be checked. Along with this, citizens have been urged to contact the police immediately if they notice anything suspicious.

Amritsar blasts

Earlier this month, a blast occurred at Heritage Street in Amritsar City of Punjab. Several people were injured after the explosion which occurred in a nearby gas pipeline on May 6. A nearby restaurant was damaged in the blast. Reportedly, a man sleeping on a bench near the restaurant was also injured after the glass panes broke into pieces following the explosion. Further, a group of 6 female tourists, who were present in the vicinity of the restaurant, also sustained injuries. 

On May 8, a second low-intensity mysterious blast was reported to have taken place on Heritage Street, located near the Golden Temple in Amritsar. The police had said that two blasts were caused by low-grade explosives without detonators. One person was injured in the blast and a car windshield was shattered due to the impact. Two 250 ml cans of the health drink “Hell” were packed with explosives, according to police sources, and were used to execute the two explosions on Amritsar’s Heritage Street.

A third low-intensity blast took place in Amritsar during the same week. The 3rd blast took place in the pathway and park around the Golden Temple, behind the Guru Ramdas Ji Niwas (inn) building.

Various run-ins between bureaucracy and Kejriwal govt led to the impasse which finally led to Modi govt bringing in the ordinance: Read what happened

Late at night on the 19th of May 2023, the Modi government promulgated an ordinance which essentially overturned the decision of the Supreme Court to give the power to post, transfer and appoint officers to the Delhi Government. While the AAP government held on to the power to appoint, post and transfer officials, the central government retained the power over police, order and land. The Centre has brought an ordinance notifying rules for the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (GNCTD) which restored some of the power back to the central government as well.

Through the ordinance, a National Capital territory Service Authority has been established by the central government. 

The permanent authority would comprise of the Chief Minister of Delhi, the Chief Secretary of GNCTD and the principal secretary of the central home ministry. 

It is this authority that would make recommendations with regards to transfers of officials, posting, appointments and the vigilance authority.

The essential element of the ordinance is that it does give power exclusively to the central government and take away the power from the AAP government, however, it establishes a Service Authority where there would be a collaborative effort to recommend transfer, postings and appointments, essentially ensuring the central govt also has a say in such matters.

After the central government promulgated the ordinance, AAP has been on the warpath. Using their usual over-dramatic rhetoric, AAP has branded the move “treacherous”.

Delhi Education Minister Atishi said, “The ordinance brought about by the Centre is against the Supreme Court ruling giving the AAP government control over services in the National Capital. SC had ruled that an elected government should have the power to take decisions. This is called democracy. The ordinance has been passed as the Centre is fearful of the authority vested to AAP by the Supreme Court ruling”. She said that the ordinance says that Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal would not govern the Delhi government. “But the Centre will run it. It is clear that the Central government is fearful of the Aam Admi Party Government. Centre became fearful of the Supreme Court ruling. Therefore they have passed such an ordinance”.

Delhi Minister Saurabh Bhardwaj also termed the ordinance an “act of dishonesty and treachery”.”The Centre has done treachery with the ruling of the Supreme Court, Indian Constitution. With the people of Delhi. The people of Delhi elected Arvind Kejriwal three times. Today the Centre is saying that such a leader has no powers”. “Lieutenant Governor who has not been elected but rather imposed on the people of Delhi is being conferred with powers of posting and transfer. The ordinance shows disrespect towards the Supreme Court ruling,” the AAP leader said.

It is evident that the AAP leaders are not being honest. AAP has asserted that the power has been taken away from them, the elected representatives, and vested to an unelected individual – the LG. The Service Authority established by the ordinance would comprise of the Chief Minister of Delhi, the Chief Secretary of GNCTD and the principal secretary of the central home ministry. Therefore, the AAP government is equally involved in the process, contrary to what it is saying in its statements. In fact, since the Supreme Court in its order had specifically said that the central govt can amend the GNCTD Act if it wishes to modify the powers of the LG, itself notes that the central govt did not work against the Supreme Court order but in accordance with it.

Besides the shenanigans of AAP post the promulgation of the ordinance, it also becomes essential to understand why the central government had to bring in this ordinance in the national interest.

There has been a raging war between the bureaucracy and the Arvind Kejriwal-led AAP government in Delhi, leading to several impasse. There have been several officers who have complained that they were being threatened by the minister of the AAP government and this decision was essential to ensure the smooth functioning of the national capital territory which is of paramount importance and the seat of India’s democracy.

Here are some of the officers who had complaint about being threatened by the Minister of the Arvind Kejriwal government

Ashish More

Hours after the Supreme Court verdict giving exclusive powers of appointment, transfer and posting to the AAP government, a senior official had said that he was being threatened by the minister of the AAP govt, Saurabh Bhardwaj.

Senior Beaurocrat Ashish More sent a complaint against Delhi minister Saurabh Bharadwaj to the Chief Secretary and Lieutenant Governor alleging misbehaviour. More said that on the 16th of May, Saurabh Bhardwaj called him to his chamber, threatened him and misbehaved with him. The letter of complaint that More wrote asked for strict action against the minister.

In response to these grave allegations, AAP resorted to its juvenile tactics yet again, claiming that Ashish More was lying and that he was making these allegations due to a conspiracy by the LG. Bhardwaj at the time had said, “Services Minister Saurabh Bhardwaj, instructed Services Secretary, Ashish More, to present a file for the transfer of a new officer to the post of Secretary of Services Department. However, Ashish More unexpectedly left the Secretariat without notifying the minister’s office, rendering himself unreachable while his phone also remained switched off,” a statement said.

AAP had also said that More was not “politically neutral” – which is a charge the levy against every bureaucrat that does not capitulate to their illegalities fully, thereby making it difficult for the UT of Delhi to function properly.

Special Secretary Vigilance YVVJ Rajasekhar

Special Secretary Vigilance YVVJ Rajasekhar, who was divested of his duties by Services Minister Saurabh Bharadwaj last week, wrote a letter to the Ministry of Home Affairs, Delhi Anti-Corruption Branch and L-G office. The letter that in the wee hours of the night, his office was broken into and sensitive files related to the excise policy probe, renovation of Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal’s residence and those referred to central investigation agencies was photocopied. Room no. 403, Special Secretary (Vigilance) at Delhi Sectt, was broken into on the intervening night of 15th and 16th May at 3:00 AM. The letter also expressed apprehensions that his office might have been bugged. 

The letter, YVVJ Rajashekhar says is in continuation of his previous report which stated how the Minister (Vigilance), Saurabh Bharadwaj, had instructed Assistant Directors not to submit the files related to the corruption cases to the vigilance officer.

Bhardwaj had claimed that Rajashekhar was mired in corruption. Arvind Kejriwal had in turn claimed that a Delhi-based NGO had sent a legal notice to the Delhi government because of the corruption by Rajashekhar. Only yesterday, the NGO denied having sent any legal notice or accusing Rajashekhar of corruption. NGO’s chairperson, GK Gupta, wrote to Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal, saying, “Abhinav Samaj has neither issued a legal notice nor filed a complaint against any Delhi government officer.” Gupta, himself a retired Delhi government officer, told HT, “The organisation has not forwarded such a complaint.”

“I have never made a complaint against YVVJ Rajasekhar either individually or on behalf of Abhinav Samaj. I am retired from the government and have worked under him in 1999. After that I never met him… according to my experience, he has been an honest officer. The so-called complaint/notice is fake, fictitious and made with mala-file intention… If it is a legal notice, it must have been sent by an advocate. Please investigate him as well,” wrote NGO chairman GK Gupta.

Therefore, it is safe to assume that Arvind Kejriwal and his minister lied blatantly, accusing Rajashekhar of corruption and extortion, simply to remove him since he was probing allegations of corruption against AAP and Arvind Kejriwal himself.

Assault of Chief Secretary Anshu Prakash

In 2018, Chief Secretary Anshu Prakash said that he was assaulted by AAP MLAs at the residence of Arvind Kejriwal at midnight. In his complaint to the police in February, 2018, Prakash said that Kejriwal, Sisodia and 11 AAP MLAs assaulted him in a midnight meeting called by the CM’s advisor, VK Jain to discuss the release of the party’s advertisements related to the government completing three years in Delhi.

At that time, Bureaucrats were up in arms against the AAP government ever since news of the assault on Anshu Prakash broke out. They had announced a complete boycott of the AAP government and stated that they would maintain only a formal written contract with the Delhi government until the Chief Minister apologizes for the assault. The bureaucrats had also registered a silent protest outside their offices and the silent protest will continue every day for five minutes to make a “strong statement”.

After the assault of the Chief Secretary, Ex-IAS officer Dhir Jhingran had resigned as a member of the State Advisory Council for Education in Delhi in solidarity with the victim of assault, Anshu Prakash, who was his batchmate.

The retired IAS officer wrote, “This is to inform you that I have been deeply shocked and saddened by the reprehensible incident that took place on February 19 night at the residence of the Chief Minister where Mr Anshu Prakash, Chief Secretary, who is also my batchmate in the IAS, was assaulted.”

In 2022, while the court acquitted Arvind Kejriwal and others of charges of criminal conspiracy in the case, it did frame charges against AAP leaders Amanatullah Khan and Prakash Jarwal for obstructing a public servant on duty, assaulting him, and voluntarily causing hurt to Prakash taking note of the statement of the CM’s former adviser VK Jain.

Therefore, while Kejriwal was acquitted by a court of law, it is apparent that an IAS officer was indeed assaulted while on duty, in the residence of Arvind Kejriwal. This proves that the AAP government has been in constant turmoil with the bureaucracy.

AAP minister Kailash Gahlot accused of threatening IAS Varsha Joshi

In 2018, another incident had come to the fore. the Delhi Government Employees Association, in a statement on Twitter, said that a Delhi minister misbehaved with a female IAS officer and insulted her in front of subordinates. The statement also claims that the minister threatened to have the officer implicated in false cases.

The statement reads, “All the officers and staff of Transport Department are greatly pained over the misbehaviour of Shri Kailash Gahlot, Minister (Transport), Govt. of Delhi with Ms. Varsha Joshi, IAS, Secretary-cum-Commissioner (Transport), in the Conference Room of Transport Minister on 3.08.2018. In the said meeting, the Minister not only misbehaved with an honest and upright woman officer but also insulted her in the presence of more than 30 subordinate officers. The Minister also threatened the Secretary to implicate her in false case and directed his staff to stop the entry of Secretary to his room if she tries to enter his office.”

The IAS Association had also condemned the incident through its official Twitter handle.

AAP MLA caught on camera calling for assault of IAS officers

After the assault of Chief Secretary Anshu Prakash, while Arvind Kejriwal brazened it out, his minister was caught on camera justifying the assault and calling for mob violence against IAS officers.

While addressing a rally in Uttam Nagar, AAP MLA Naresh Balyan says, ‘jo Chief Secy ke sath hua, jo inhone jhootha aarop lagaya, main to keh raha hu aise adhikariyo ko thokna chahye, jo aam aadmi ke kaam rok ke baithe hain aise adhikariyo ke sath yahi salook hona chahye.’.

Women officers claim harassment, say they were forced to come to work late at night

In 2018 again, the women IAS officers had said in a meeting with PMO officials (Dr Jitendra Singh) that woman IAS officers were harassed regularly by AAP MLAs. They said that they were not surprised by the assault of Chief Secretary Anshu Prakash because they go through this ordeal on a regular basis.

They claimed that female officers were called late at night and harassed by AAP MLAs. They said they were also forced to sign decisions that they did not agree with.

This is merely the tip of the iceberg. From these incidents alone, and there are many more, it is proved beyond reasonable doubt that the AAP government had a grouse with the bureaucracy and had assaulted, threatened and forced favourable signatures etc from several IAS officers. This historical tussle between the AAP government and the bureaucrats had only dampened the administration of an important UT. The decision of the central government, therefore, comes at the heel of such conflict where it became necessary to step in between the AAP government and the bureaucracy to ensure the smooth functioning of Delhi and to ensure that the people of Delhi would not suffer the consequences of a dysfunctional government.