Home Blog Page 6244

Doctors are life-savers, professionals, not magicians and certainly not slaves

They are life-savers. Professionals who spend decades harnessing their talent. They often go beyond the call of their duty to ensure they live up to the oath they have taken:

“I swear to fulfil, to the best of my ability and judgment, this covenant: I will respect the hard-won scientific gains of those physicians in whose steps I walk, and gladly share such knowledge as is mine with those who are to follow. I will apply, for the benefit of the sick, all measures [that] are required, avoiding those twin traps of overtreatment and therapeutic nihilism. I will remember that there is art to medicine as well as science, and that warmth, sympathy, and understanding may outweigh the surgeon’s knife or the chemist’s drug. I will not be ashamed to say “I know not,” nor will I fail to call in my colleagues when the skills of another are needed for a patient’s recovery. I will respect the privacy of my patients, for their problems are not disclosed to me that the world may know. Most especially must I tread with care in matters of life and death. If it is given me to save a life, all thanks. But it may also be within my power to take a life; this awesome responsibility must be faced with great humbleness and awareness of my own frailty. Above all, I must not play at God.

I will remember that I do not treat a fever chart, a cancerous growth, but a sick human being, whose illness may affect the person’s family and economic stability. My responsibility includes these related problems if I am to care adequately for the sick. I will prevent disease whenever I can, for prevention is preferable to cure. I will remember that I remain a member of society, with special obligations to all my fellow human beings, those sound of mind and body as well as the infirm. If I do not violate this oath, may I enjoy life and art, respected while I live and remembered with affection, thereafter. May I always act so as to preserve the finest traditions of my calling and may I long experience the joy of healing those who seek my help”. 

They promise to help us to the best of their ability. While that might sound like a simple statement for most, when life and death hang in the balance, the ‘best of their ability’ statement takes prominence.

Recently, we saw a Muslim mob attack doctors mercilessly in West Bengal because an 85-year-old man could not be treated and died of natural causes. Doctors throughout the country went on strikes and demanded that they are treated with respect and dignity. They demanded that they are kept safe.

Then, after the wrath of Encephalitis in Bihar, we saw journalists heckle and give the third-degree to government hospital doctors who visibly looked agitated and overworked.

While the human reaction might be to first question the doctors, the epidemic of attacks on doctors and the culture of heckling doctors should raise alarm bells. Doctors are humans, like us, They too feel pain and hurt, just like us. However, their responsibilities are far greater. And they also constantly face the risk of being blamed, attacked and even demonised for doing their job.

Recently, a doctor in the UK, Dr, Keith Wolverson, was on the verge of losing his job and a facing a halt in his long career because he had asked a Muslim woman to remove her niqab so he could hear her better. The woman’s husband had complained against the doctor claiming racial discrimination.

The case of young Paribaha Mukherjee having his skull cracked by a mob of over 200 men arriving in trucks to launch a vicious attack on the NRS hospital is not a one-off incident. It was just the tipping point. West Bengal’s doctors took to streets because it was their only way of saying “enough is enough”. The state government was simply not listening. Dr Binayak Sinha, a Kolkata-based senior doctor has recently written on The Economic Times that in the last two years, there have been over 175 incidents of violent attacks on doctors and healthcare staffers in Bengal alone.

Earlier this month, a man named Rafiq Rasheed came with a knife to Dr Ramkrishna Verma’s clinic in Indore and, after learning of his absence, attacked the doctor’s wife and son. The woman died, the son was critically injured. Rasheed was apparently unhappy that Dr Verma’s treatment for his skin disorder was not working.

One wonders if this culture of heckling and attacking stems from the general attitude that has been prevalent in society. Often we hear wails of how doctors overcharge or how, when one goes to a surgeon, one does not come out with a simple prescription for medication, but almost always, the advice for surgery, even when not required. One hears several people complain of how doctors are ordering needless tests just to ensure their billables increase.

Or how, doctors often, under the pressure of big Pharma companies prescribe expensive drugs when the generic ones would do the job just fine.

We have heard uncles and aunties sit around their living room and talk about how lawyers and doctors should be kept far away or how a 90-year-old aunt died because of the doctor’s negligence. In the same breath, you would hear another person chime in and accuse doctors of stacking up the bill by keeping the patient hooked on to life support.

Doctors, damned if they do, damned if they don’t.

This is not to say devious doctors who only know the scent of money do not exist. But when the society at large sees doctors either as Gods or the Devil, such attacks on doctors and such shameless heckling is bound to continue.

We have often seen doctors ‘work miracles’. We have seen doctors travel to remote parts of the world, endangering their own lives to ensure that the sick and the needy are taken care of. We have seen doctors go above and beyond the call of duty. As a general group, doctors by and large do right by their patients.

But it is with an awareness that one would realise that some tests might appear necessary to a doctor, while it might seem needless to the initiated-by-google-doctor-who-doubles-up-as-a-patient. That perhaps that extra MRI was needed. Or that extra blood test was vital to rule out the suspicion of some disease that the doctor did not think fit to disclose beforehand.

Doctors can work miracles, sometimes, but they are not miracle workers. Doctors serve and cure, but they cannot trump God himself. Doctors try their best to save lives with limited resources that governments and bureaucrats may provide, but they don’t deserve to be heckled just because the media does not have the courage to ask real questions to the ones who wield power.

Doctors work under extremely stressful environments and are susceptible to burnouts. A study from rural British Columbia reported that 80% of physicians suffered from moderate to severe Emotional Exhaustion, 61% suffered from moderate to severe Depersonalisation, and 44% had moderate to low feelings of Personal Accomplishment.

A more recent study of US physicians found 46% of the respondents had at least one symptom of burnout. European General Practice Research Network Burnout Study Group, on the other hand, found that, while 12% of participants suffered from burnout in all three dimensions, 43% scored high for Emotional Exhaustion, 35% for Depersonalisation, and 32% for low Personal Accomplishment. In the United Kingdom, approximately one-third of the physicians had features of burnout, which are comparable to studies from Arab countries like Yemen, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia.

The burnout percentage among Indian doctors are exceptionally high too. The study’s author Dr Gharpure said, “Some of my colleagues used to work for 34 hours at a stretch. It is not surprising that we hear instances of doctors snapping at patients they are stretched.”

Medicine is a profession that clearly needs the professional to go above and beyond the average physical and emotional capacity. While the job itself, where they have an individual’s life and death in their hands, is stressful the added stress of being beaten up and heckled at the first sign of trouble is the last thing they need, not only for their own sanity but also so they can continue to be in the condition to adequately treat their patients.

Doctors are caregivers. Lifesavers and sometimes, they are miracle workers. They are not Gods and they are certainly not slaves. They are professionals who are trained to do a job. While a doctor’s negligence can lead to someone’s life being snuffed away, blaming a doctor for trying to save an ailing old man’s life but failing, leads one nowhere. They are not God. For the media to go heckle doctors working in meagre conditions, with the meagre conditions being the fault of the administration, only add to the frenzy, doesn’t solve it.

Economic Advisory Council slams Arvind Subramanian, says his criticism of GDP estimation methodology ‘lacks rigor’

The Economic Advisory Council to the Prime Minister (EAC-PM) has released a detailed analysis of India’s new GDP estimation methodology. In it, the Council has defended the technique dubbing it to be at par with global standards. It also offers a point-by-point rebuttal to former Chief Economic Adviser Dr. Arvind Subramanian’s critique of the technique where he had asserted that GDP numbers had been overestimated.

The report says, “India’s GDP estimation methodology stands at par with its global standing as a major and responsible economy. It is of the quality and precision expected from a transparent and well managed economy. The new methodology introduced in 2015 is a testament to India’s intent to adopt the most modern global standards to accurately report its economic data. And India’s direction and pace towards the goal of accurate National Income Accounting is worthy of praise.”

The primary contributors of the report “reject the author’s (Subramanian’s) methodology, arguments and conclusions” in the paper titled ‘India’s GDP Mis-estimation: Likelihood, Magnitudes, Mechanisms, and Implications’. They say that the paper does not specifically critique coverage or methodology and “lacks rigor in terms of specific data sources and description; alternative hypothesis; rationale of equation specifications, use of dummies, and robustness-check diagnostics of estimated equations; and choice of countries in the sample and a specific list”. Therefore, “it would not stand the scrutiny of academic or policy research standards”. It also remarks that the paper is not peer-reviewed.

The EAC analysis says that the former CEA has cherry-picked 17 indicators from a private agency, which is not a primary source of information.

The report notes that “the weakness of Dr. Subramanian’s attempt to suggest that the growth numbers are over-estimated confirms that the estimation process is robust to spurious criticism.” And stresses further, “The fact of the matter is that India’s GDP methodology is consistent with internationally accepted standards and is in a continuous process of improvement.” The statement also notes that Dr. Arvind Subramanian’s paper is not peer-reviewed.

However, the paper does admit that “GDP calculation has always been an imperfect art” and “Irrespective of the methodology, there are always some areas that require extrapolation, estimation and sometimes even guestimates based on past trends”. The primary contributors to the report are Bibek Debroy, Rathin Roy, Surjit Bhalla, Charan Singh and Arvind Virmani.

Reacting to Subramanian’s comments that India’s GDP has been overestimated by the previous governments, the government of India had issued a clarification last week as well.

The full report of the Economic Advisory Council can be accessed here [PDF].

Kerala MP to table private member’s bill at Lok Sabha to overturn the Supreme Court’s Sabarimala verdict

N K Premachandran, Lok Sabha MP from Kollam in Kerala, will move a private member’s bill in the Lok Sabha seeking to overturn the Supreme Court’s verdict on Sabarimala. The bill would be presented on Friday and it would be the first private member’s bill to be tabled in the new Lok Sabha.

As per reports, Premachandran’s Sabarimala Sreedharma Sastha Temple (Special Provisions) Bill, 2019 seeks “status quo on religious practices of the Sabarimala Sreedharma Sastha Temple, as existed on the 1st day of September 2018”.

N K Premachandran is an MP from Kollam and a member of Revolutionary Socialist Party (RSP) which is part of the Congress-led United Democratic Front (UDF) in Kerala. He was among the several MPs who had opposed the Supreme Court verdict.

The bill seeks to restore the customs that were followed by the temple and if the law comes into effect all petitions and appeals pending before the court and tribunals should become invalid. Any modification in temple customs should be based on religious practices that were followed on September 1, 2018. Both the centre and state governments should ensure that religious practices are being carried out.

Since it is a private member’s bill even though it would be presented on Friday it would only be taken up for discussion on July 12.

Annie Raje, a CPI leader and General Secretary of National Federation of Indian Women termed the bill as “feudal and manuvaadi” and said that it was unfortunate for the first bill to presented is “anti-women”.

Prior to the Supreme Court verdict, the rules of the temple were such that women between the age of 10-50 were restricted from entry. The identities of women entering the temple were checked by the police and only allowed if they satisfied the requirement. A few years ago a petition was filed to allow women of all ages to enter the temples.

On 28 September 2018, the Supreme Court delivered a verdict allowing women of all ages entry into Kerala’s Sabarimala temple. It was seen as a major step towards gender equality by a few, contrary to the views of women who in large numbers protested and demanded an ordinance against the verdict.

In the 4:1 majority verdict of the Supreme Court, the sole dissenting voice was of Justice Indu Malhotra, the only woman in the 5-judge bench. Her Ladyship observed that there exists a difference between diversity and discrimination.

The interveners of the petition, including J Sai Deepak who represented the group People for Dharma, gave a tough fight and gave some stunning arguments. Hearing the arguments in court, Advocate Prerna Kumari, who was one of the petitioners revealed that she respects the sentiments of female devotees of the temple who are ready to wait till they turn 50 and allowed entry to the temple.

The verdict had hurt the sentiments of the devotees and triggered a countrywide protest. The Congress had also made a turnaround from their initial stand of supporting the verdict although the high command of the party has a different view.

In October review petitions had been filed challenging the Supreme Court’s decision. Despite the protests, The Kerala Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan said that it would not be filing a review petition and would ensure the SC order is implemented.

Without the support of the government, devotees had taken it upon themselves to safeguard their tradition. Violence had ensued at the instigation of Left Wing Extremist groups. Several activists attempted to barge into the temple after the SC order. In haste to implement the order, a massive police force was arranged to fortify the temple. A large number of Devotees have also been arrested for protesting.

With the help of the communist government, two women in total have managed to desecrate the temple, angering the devotees.

The Kerala High Court came down heavily on the Kerala Communist government for interfering unnecessarily in the daily affairs of Sabarimala temple. In February, the Supreme Court had reserved its judgement after hearing the 65 review petitions.

Prime Minister Modi had earlier voiced his support for the devotees of Sabarimala and the BJP had promised to protect traditions in its manifesto.

Yogi government clears draft ordinance to curb anti-national activities on university campuses

On Tuesday, the Uttar Pradesh government led by CM Yogi Adityanath has passed a new draft ordinance in a bid to curb anti-national activities on campuses.

The new draft ordinance has been passed by the state government making it mandatory for all existing and new private universities to submit an undertaking they will not allow any anti-national activities on their campuses. The draft also enables all universities to come under one ‘umbrella act’ so as not to allow any separate provisions.


The draft named as “Uttar Pradesh Private Universities Ordinance, 2019” enables al 27 private universities of the state to come under an umbrella act. Existing universities have a period of one year to adopt all provisions of the proposed law.

In a statement, the government said, “among the requirements, which are required to be fulfilled by the establishing institution, a provision has been made to give an undertaking that their university will not be involved in any anti-national activities and neither will they allow such activity inside their campus or in their name.”

Besides curbing anti-national activities Universities are also required to meet other objectives such as national integration, secularism, social harmony, international goodwill, ethics, as well as attempts to inculcate patriotism.

Reportedly, the new ordinance would also bring about improvements in the education system including regulation of fee structure, uniform academic calendar, publishing admission requirements in public domain and making the National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC) evaluation mandatory for all private universities.

The cabinet has also approved an endowment fund of Rs 5 crore in order to help students to complete their degree in case the university fails to function in the middle of the session due to any reason.

Strict action would be taken against Universities on complaints of forgery, they may even get de-recognized if it has been found that there is a gross misuse of funds or fraud.

In 2016, students of JNU, Kanhaiya Kumar and Umar Khalid were arrested on charges of sedition for organising an event that commemorated terrorist Afzal Guru. Delhi police special Cell had submitted 1200-page charge-sheet in January this year. In February, a Delhi court came down hard on the Aravind Kejriwal led government for delaying the prosecution.

Digvijay Singh locks his Twitter account, whines over lack of retweets

Senior Congress leader Digvijay Singh was called out on social media today after he started complaining that his Tweets are not being RTed due to ‘Twitter policy intervention’ or hacking.

Always quite vocal on Twitter and otherwise, Digvijay Singh has been targetting the central government and questioning the alleged intelligence failure that had resulted in the IED attack in CRPF jawans recently.

A while later, Digvijay complained that his tweets are not showing the Retweet option and he cannot even see two previous tweets where he had questioned the government over intelligence failure. Singh then theorised that this might be a case of Twitter policy intervention or hacking.

Soon after Digvijay had tweeted, abusive troll Swati Chaturvedi jumped in to echo his words. She also claimed that she cannot retweet Singh’s tweets either.

Actually, at that time, Digvijay Singh’s Twitter account was under ‘locked’ status. When a Twitter account is under ‘locked status, a person’s tweets cannot be retweeted, no person can follow the user without his/her approval and non-followers cannot see the tweets from that account.

Digvijay Singh’s gaffe was pointed out by a Twitter user.


Digvijay perhaps realised his mistake and changed the features in his Twitter account. As of now, his Twitter profile doesn’t show a ‘locked’ status. his tweets over the Kashmir issue are also visible and have several retweets. His tweet complaining of hacking has been deleted too.

However, a person like Digvijay Singh, who is seen quite frequently on the social media platform, making such a mistake and taking it a step further to blame ‘policy intervention’ or hacking for it has left Twitter users amused. Equally hilarious is the fact that troll cum journalist Swati Chaturvedi also jumped in on the whining.

Sarabjeet Singh, the tempo driver in the Mukherjee Nagar incident is a history-sheeter: Reports

Social Media has been abuzz recently after a video went viral that showed Delhi Police thrashing a Tempo Driver, Sarabjeet Singh, and his son. However, it was soon revealed that the Temp Driver was not an innocent victim in the entire series of events.


Politicians across the spectrum made it a religious issue as the Tempo Driver was a Sikh and ignored the fact that Policemen were initially attacked with a sword.


After politicians entered the fray, the incident took a religious turn. Sikhs turned up in huge numbers to protest in favour of Sarabjeet. However, there were indications that there was more to the incident than meets the eye. Supporters of the Driver gathered in huge numbers at the Mukherjee Nagar Police Station to register their protests. As per reports, Khalistani slogans were also raised. A Policeman who was trying to pacify the crowd and quell the tensions were also attacked.


Now, it appears, Sarabjeet is a history-sheeter and has numerous cases filed against him. In April, he attacked Mangal Singh, Sevadar at a Gurudwara, for questioning why he was sleeping near the ‘Sarovar’ of the Bangla Saheb Gurudwara for the past few days. He broke Mangal’s arm and was arrested for it before he was released on bail. He was involved in violence in 2006, 2011 and 2013 as well and was arrested for the same.

Three Policemen have thus far been suspended over the matter. While the Police bear the brunt of it, Politicians have lionized Sarabjeet and photo-ops are being conducted with him and his son at Gurudwaras. From the facts of the matter that are in public view, it appears to be a clear case of a violent history-sheeter who once again lost his temper and threatened and attacked the Police with a sword.

Spokesperson of BJP, Delhi, Tajinder Pal Singh Bagga echoed similar sentiments on Twitter. Citing Sarabjeet’s criminal background, he requested everyone to “stop seeing everything through the prism of religion” and asked everyone to “stand with the truth”.


The Police is often blamed for not being effective enough in controlling mobs but on occasions such as these, it appears political considerations take primacy over law and order issues. The suspension of the Policemen involved in the incident reeks of injustice and one hopes that it will be revoked after a fair inquiry.

Politics of polarisation: ‘Jai Shri Ram’, ‘Joy Maa Kali’ and Owaisi’s fantasy of Muslim plus Dalit vote bank

The oath-taking ceremony for the elected representatives of the 17th Lok Sabha beautifully captured the precipice at which our country currently finds itself in. The Parliament resounded with chants of “Jai Shri Ram”, “Joy Maa Kali”, “Jai Bheem” and there was also a Muslim MP who declared that chanting Vande Mataram is contrary to the principles of Islam.

For the first time in a great, great many years, our Parliament turned into a battleground of cultures. There are justifiable reasons why some people might be uncomfortable with the events that transpired, however, in a Democracy, it is in the best interests of everyone involved that the Parliament accurately reflects Indian social anxieties and concerns.

The Gods, themselves, have entered our Parliament finally it appears. While BJP MPs from Bengal took their oaths amidst chants of “Jai Shri Ram”, those from Trinamool raised slogans of “Jai Maa Kali” and “Jai Maa Durga”. This was consistent with Trinamool’s efforts to separate Bengalis from the larger Hindu identity on the basis of the Gods we worship. The Muslim leaders, too, responded with “Allahu Akbar” and other Islamic slogans. This is how Nehruvian Secularism dies.

Asauddin Owaisi, quite smartly, used the opportunity to further his pet political project. Along with “Allahu Akbar”, he also threw in “Jai Bheem” into the midst indicating his long-held desire of forging a Dalit-Muslim vote-bank. It is, of course, a fantasy that will never ever materialize. Efforts towards that end have been made since decades, however, as time has gone by, Dalits have only become more and more saffronized in terms of their politics.

The saffronization of Dalits is quite evident from the findings of the CSDS post-poll survey. BJP’s vote-share went up among all Hindu castes. 34% of Dalits voted for the BJP compared to 24% in 2014, the same numbers for Adivasis are 44% compared to 37%. Thus, it appears Owaisi’s dream of a Dalit-Muslim vote-bank will remain so for quite a while.

There’s a reason why the fantasy vote-bank will never materialize. Dalits, by and large, suffer the most at the hands of Islamic extremism. There have been numerous occasions when Dalits have been the victims of crimes committed by Muslims. In sociology departments of reputed Universities, it might be fashionable for scholars to theorize about a possible alliance between them but such theories are not based on ground realities. On the ground, there’s great animosity between the two groups. It can also be legitimately argued that it was Mayawati’s increased proximity towards Muslims that further eroded her support among her community.

There’s also something extremely perverse about Owaisi chanting “Jai Bheem”. Bhimrao Ambedkar was a vocal critic of Islam and the Muslim community and it is safe to say that had he been alive today, he wouldn’t have had very nice things to say about those who support evil traditions such as Triple Talaq.

Here is an example of what Ambedkar thought about the Muslim community:

“The second defect of Islam is that it is a system of social self-government and is incompatible with local self-government, because the allegiance of a Muslim does not rest on his domicile in the country which is his but on the faith to which he belongs. …. Wherever there is the rule of Islam, there is his own country. In other words, Islam can never allow a true Muslim to adopt India as his motherland and regard a Hindu as his kith and kin.”

Some people have opined that BJP MPs chanting “Jai Shri Ram”, “Vande Mataram” and “Bharat Mata Ki Jai” when Asauddin Owaisi was approaching towards the podium to take the oath was ‘bullying’. Although the behaviour may appear deplorable at first, there’s a larger context to it that everyone appears to be missing here. There’s a reason why Owaisi attracts such reactions.

It was Owaisi’s brother, Akbaruddin Owaisi, who had argued that if Police was withdrawn for 15 minutes across India, then Muslims would show 1 billion Hindus who is the boss. Asaduddin Owaisi, quite ostensibly, does not consider that a disqualifying remark and we have Akbaruddin as the current MLA in the Telangana Legislative Assembly.

People of a secular hue might forget such things but ordinary people don’t. Asaduddin Owaisi has never tried to shy away from the image the Hindutva camp has portrayed of him. He may appear eloquent with his words and quite the intellectual but his actions betray his intentions. Therefore, ‘bullying’ is the wrong word to use here. The more appropriate description of it is ‘mocking’. Whether mocking Owaisi was appropriate or otherwise will vary depending on one’s own political inclinations.

In his first speech after reelection, Prime Minister Narendra Modi had said that the brand of Secularism which was practised in the country thus far was dead. While the conduct of his own government since then betray his words, the elected representatives have amply demonstrated that the days of Nehruvian Secularism have long since past.

Going forwards, Politics in the country will likely become even more polarised as the battle transforms directly into one between the forces of Hindu Consolidation and that of Specific Castes plus Muslim vote-bank politics. And one thing is for certain, the ‘Secular’ characteristic of the Parliament will be further eroded which isn’t necessarily a bad thing in itself. And Asaduddin Owaisi will have a crucial role to play in the years to come.

Perhaps in the chaos of the Parliament, our leaders will be able to find the answers that have long plagued our country. Who are we as a nation? Why does India exist? What is India’s purpose in the world? What is India’s core identity? The polarised environment within the Parliament provides us with an opportunity to deliberate upon these fundamental questions. It’s only when we, as a nation, have answered the fundamental questions of our past that we can move forward towards a ‘New India’.

Congress party dissolves Karnataka Pradesh Congress Committee

The All India Congress Committee has decided to dissolve the Karnataka Pradesh Congress Committee. A brief statement issued by the AICC said that the present committee of the PCC has been dissolved. But the President and the Working President of Karnataka Congress remain unchanged.


AICC Press release

Congress is in power in Karnataka with an alliance with JD(S), where the H. D. Kumaraswamy from JD(S) is the CM. Despite being the larger partner, Congress allowed JD(S) to lead the government after the assembly elections in 2018 resulted in a hung assembly. The relationship between the two alliance partners remains troubled as the CM keeps complaining about interference and non-cooperation by Congress.

The Karanata Congress is also grappling with the problem of dissidence, as several party MLAs are rumoured to be contemplating joining the BJP. Yesterday the party had suspended senior party leader Roshan Baig alleging anti-party activities. Baig is an AICC member, and recently he had spoken against the state leadership of the party.

Uttar Pradesh government to release CM’s speech and press releases in Sanskrit

The Uttar Pradesh government would soon translate important speeches of CM Yogi Adityanath and government press releases into Sanskrit. The BJP government has made this decision in a bid to promote the usage of the ancient language.

Avaneesh Awasthi, the Additional Chief Secretary of the State Information Department, said, “to promote Sanskrit, significant speeches of the Chief Minister and government information will also be released in Sanskrit, which was done in just Hindi, English and Urdu till now”.

To translate the Chief Minister’s speech, the department has decided to enlist the help of Lucknow based Rashtriya Sanskrit Sansthan.

An official said, “This is the first time that such a step is being taken. The speech of chief minister (Yogi Adityanath) delivered at a recent NITI Aayog meeting in New Delhi was released in Sanskrit and was well received. Now we plan to expand it further”.

On June 17th, Yogi Adityanath had said, “Sanskrit is in the DNA of India, it is now limited to the work of priests”. At present, there are 25 periodicals that are printed in the ancient language in the state, however, none of them is printed daily.

The Uttar Pradesh government in February gave a major boost to the language by allocating Rs. 242 crores for grants to Sanskrit Pathshalas in the state. Another 30 crores have been allotted to provide a grant to aided Sanskrit schools and degree colleges.

The language has faced several hurdles in the past. In January, a petition had been filed against recitation of prayers in Kendriya Vidyalaya claiming that it creates a lot of obstacles in developing scientific temperament and that it was imparting religious instructions.

Last week in an attempt to preserve and promote the ancient Indian heritage, Union HRD Minister, Dr Ramesh Pokhriyal ‘Nishank’ had said that at least two Sanskrit-speaking villages must be developed near the central institutes. Picking up on the trend of promoting the language, even the West Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee has challenged PM Modi and Amit Shah to a mantra chanting competition.

Radical Islamist Zakir Naik ordered to appear before court on July 31, non-bailable warrant to be issued if he fails to appear

A special PMLA court has ordered radical Islamist Zakir Naik to physically appear before the court on July 31, reports ANI.

The court has also warned Zakir Naik that it will issue a non-bailable warrant if fails to appear before the court on the scheduled hearing. The court was hearing an application filed by the Enforcement Directorate seeking a non-bailable warrant against Zakir Naik.

Recently, Zakir Naik fearing deportation from Malaysia had appealed before the court that he would be willing to come back to India if the Supreme Court gives a written assurance that he would not be arrested and jailed till he is actually convicted.

In a statement, Naik had said that he has trust in the Indian judiciary but he had no faith in the prosecution system.

The Indian agencies had requested Interpol for issuing a red corner notice against Zakir Naik and Interpol had decided to look into India’s request for issuing a red corner notice against Islamist preacher Zakir Naik. A team from Interpol is also expected to visit New Delhi as part of its investigation into the matter.

Naik has been notorious in spreading hatred between religious groups and for inciting Muslim youth to join in the jihad against non-believers of Islam. He used to use his NGO ‘Islamic Research Foundation’ (IRF) and a TV channel (Peace TV) to air his hate speeches in the country. The government of India had taken the channel off the air and banned the NGO.