Home Blog Page 6344

AAP’s Bhagwant Mann does Bhangra, throws flowers at protestors waving black flag during his roadshow

Aam Aadmi Party has begun savouring the taste of failure in barely six years of its existence. With its political existence nearly fragmenting AAP is giving its desperate last shot to hold on to relevance. The senior party leader, Bhagwant Mann, who is representing AAP party from Sangrur Lok Sabha seat in Punjab, in this pursuit, took to the streets of Punjab before the last phase of 2019 Lok Sabha elections.

However, Bhagwant Mann during his roadshow on May 14, in Benada village, Punjab was greeted with black flags and hooting. Nevertheless, the leader of the AAP, who by now has mastered the art of making a fool of himself, stood on his car and started doing the Bhangra (the Punjabi folk dance). He reportedly showered flowers at the protestors who waved black flags during his road show.


Notably, Benada village has been adopted by the AAP leader and locals there were miffed as they claimed that he has not carried out any development work in the village since the time he has extended his support to them.

Somehow, such resentment is not new for the Aam Aadmi Party. The party chief, Arvind Kejriwal on Monday was greeted with similar black flags as the Aam Aadmi Party convenor launched AAP’s election campaign in Punjab. He was reportedly doing a roadshow for Bhagwant Mann.

Asking him to return, protesters shouted slogans against him for maligning the image of the state over drugs.

Meanwhile, AAP has been lately coming across as a complete non-performer. The party’s recent desperation to remain in power has pushed them to such drastic levels that Bhagwant Mann had indicated that the party is willing to dissolve and merge with Congress party. Moreover, Delhi Chief Minister Kejriwal has also been literally pleading with Congress to form an alliance in Delhi, as he is aware of the fact that he alone can not defeat the BJP in the Lok Sabha elections, which had won all the seven seats in 2014.

In fact, the recent political scenario shows that, however, hard the AAP might be trying, it has lost the charm it had enjoyed five years ago. With most of its distinct forces abandoning the party, the citizens too, have decided to shun the party, which has no underlying ideology except deceit and drama.

After Veer Savarkar, Congress govt in Rajasthan removes demonetisation reference from school textbooks

The Rajasthan Education Minister Govind Singh Dotasara has said that the Congress government in the state has removed all references about demonetisation from school textbooks. The textbooks have been revised and will be published for the current academic session.

Dotasara said, “Demonetisation was a most unsuccessful experiment. The three objectives the Prime Minister had mentioned for demonetisation — end of terrorism, corruption and bringing back black money — couldn’t be achieved and the public was forced to stand in line. It also put a burden of more than Rs 10,000 crore on the country.”

The previous government of the BJP led by Vasundhara Raje had added a portion on demonetisation in the political science textbook of Class 12 in 2017, terming the decision of the central government decision to demonetise notes of Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 as a historic move to remove black money.

A picture depicting a woman committing johar has also been removed from the Class 8 textbook. Dotasara said, “It was felt that there was no need for the picture in an English textbook. Moreover, we felt that it wasn’t appropriate that today’s women read textbooks, which carry pictures of women committing self-immolation. What are we trying to teach by that?”

The Ministers statement comes after the Congress government in Rajasthan had decided to change the class 10 school textbooks in the state, reversing the previous BJP Government’s decision to include the contribution of freedom fighters like Veer Savarkar in the school curriculum. The textbook would now depict Savarkar as a traitor who begged for clemency from the British government.

Tajinder Bagga throws a challenge, says if Derek O Brien can prove he was anywhere near the spot of violence, he will quit politics

BJP spokesperson Tajinder Bagga who was detained by the West Bengal police after a clash erupted between BJP and TMC workers has issued a challenge to TMC leader Derek O’Brien on the latter’s unfounded allegations. In a recently concluded press conference, Derek O’Brien had defended his government’s move to arrest Tajinder Bagga claiming that the BJP is getting outsiders in West Bengal and these outsiders are responsible for the ensuing violence on the streets in Kolkata.


Tajinder Bagga had issued a challenge to Derek O-Brien to prove his involvement in the ongoing violence in West Bengal. Bagga has claimed that if Derek successfully proves that he was within 500 metres of the spot when the violence broke out, he will quit the politics. However, he also said that if Derek can’t prove his charges, he should leave the politics.

As 9 Lok Sabha seats of West Bengal go to polls this Sunday in the last phase of the elections, Kolkata streets yesterday were marked by violence that broke out between TMC and BJP supporters in the election roadshow of BJP president Amit Shah. Amit Shah’s roadshow received a massive reception as a large number of people gathered to participate in his roadshow. Towards the end of the roadshow, violence broke out between TMC and BJP supporters. Since then both parties have been pinning the blame of the violence on each other.

Today, TMC’s Derek O’Brien convened a presser to attack the BJP, claiming that the bust of Ishwarchandra Vidyasagar was vandalised by BJP workers. However, according to the screenshot of a Facebook post by one Biraj Narayan Roy that has gone viral, the incident was orchestrated by Trinamool itself. Roy, who claims to be a student of the University and an eyewitness, calls it disgusting politics and blames Trinamool for the entire mess. He claims it was virtually impossible for the BJP Karyakartas to reach the place where the Status was. He says it was smashed by Trinamool itself, then the media was summoned and the BJP blamed through it.

Earlier, Mamata Banerjee had threatened BJP that she is capable of usurping the BJP headquarters in 1 second and that they should thank their good fortune that she is sitting ‘silently’ now.

After being touted as a ‘game changer’ in 2019 elections, Priyanka Gandhi Vadra’s roadshow in Ujjain draws thin crowd

On Tuesday, Priyanka Gandhi Vadra did a roadshow in Ujjain as part of the election campaign in Madhya Pradesh. And going by the videos of the roadshow circulating on social media, it seems the roadshow was not a success and it drew a very thin crowd. In videos posted in social media, Priyanka Gandhi could be seen hurrying through the streets of Ujjain and a thin crowd running to keep up with the vehicles.


Priyanka Gandhi Vadra has been touted as a wild card for the Congress party to take on Modi government, but she doesn’t seem to be helping the party in any apparent way. The people of Ujjain have made it quite clear that merely carrying the name of Gandhi and supposed looks of Indira Gandhi is not enough to grab their interest.

Earlier, the Congress, fearing defeat in Varanasi had decided to field Ajay Rai against PM Modi, after fueling speculations that Priyanka Gandhi would be contesting against the PM. She has also got into trouble with an Animal Rights activist, Gauri Maulekhi, who accused her of “serious violation” of Wildlife Protection Act 1972 and seeking her “immediate arrest”. The National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) had also served her a notice for using children in election campaigns.

Such a low turnout during the election campaign is not new for Congress. Earlier this month the Congress president Rahul Gandhi was found to be addressing a gathering of empty chairs during his rally in Uttar Pradesh’s Sitapur. Hardik Patel also had to face a similar kind of embarrassment. The leader of Patidar Andolan Anamat Samiti (PAAS) while addressing his first public meeting in Bhopal also had to witness the sight of a large number of empty chairs.

On Tuesday, Nationalist Congress Party supremo Sharad Pawar’s rally in Maharashtra’s Ulhasnagar, which could be his last attempt to woo voters as India goes to vote for the 2019 Lok Sabha elections from tomorrow, turned out to be a miserable failure as he was seen addressing a half-empty ground.

Mani Shankar Aiyar shouts ‘F*ck off’ to journalist, again, even as pliant media apologises and turns a blind eye

Senior Congress leader Mani Shankar Aiyar, who recently came out of the woodwork and interacted with media to express his unsavoury remarks for the incumbent Prime Minister Narendra Modi, appeared thoroughly rattled as journalists questioned him over his ‘neech’ remark on PM Modi. Mani Shankar had recently penned an article in which he had defended his ‘neech’ remark for PM Modi he made in 2017 for which he was temporarily ousted from Congress.


In his recent interaction with the media, Mani Shankar Aiyar said to one of the journalists that he was getting ‘angry’ at his choice of questions. “There is a person in India, Narendra Modi. Haven’t you heard about his sharp attacks? Go and ask him,” Aiyar said. When the journalist dared to ask him, what he thinks would be the result on 23rd May, Aiyar shoved away the mic held to him and imperiously shouted “F*ck off” to the journalist.

However, what is truly amazing is the servility of the reporter who kept apologizing to Mani Shankar Aiyar for asking him seemingly tough questions and driving him up the wall. However, this is not the first time that Mani Shankar Aiyar has lost his cool on National television. Even as Aiyar lost temper and attempted a shoddy parody of PM Modi, the reporter continued profusely apologising for his questions that rubbed Aiyar the wrong way.

In 2017, Aiyar was expelled from Congress for his unruly behaviour and using a casteist slur to attack PM Modi. Many people at that time had speculated that his expulsion was because he might have upset Congress’ caste strategy with his ‘neech’ comment. However, it was just a smokescreen to placate the growing protest against Aiyar for his repulsive casteist remarks. The ouster was short-lived as he was again quietly reinstated in the party by the Congress president Rahul Gandhi, emboldening him and giving an impression that one can get away unpunished with abusing and using casteist slurs against opponents.

Aiyar had been incorrigible in his approach to attack his opponents. Earlier, during 2014 elections, Aiyar had contemptuously insulted Modi by saying that he was a ‘Chaiwala’ and he should dream of serving chai to parliamentarians, not of becoming the PM. Modi being an astute politician, used this barb to his advantage and scored a home run with his ‘Chai pe Charcha’ campaign and instantly connecting with the aspirational middle-class.

Aiyar’s cavalier disregard for civility in public life was evident when he was seen forcibly yanking the mike off the Republic TV journalist and shouting at the journalist to “f*ck off“. Aiyyar clearly felt no compunction for his act, as he pulled off the same incident of abusing a journalist. What was horrific then was that an India Today reporter was seen shielding Mani Shankar Aiyyar and defending his misbehaviour against a fellow journalist.

Even in the recent case where Mani Shankar Aiyar asks the CNN News18 reporter to “f*ck off”, the journalist who is being abused by Aiyar is seen abundantly sorry for his questions. The glaring servility of the media towards the habitual offender can’t be more pronounced. Instead of asking tough questions to his bosses- Congress leadership and Congress president Rahul Gandhi on his reinitiation in the party, journalists enthusiastically lap him up for his irrelevant political views only to take the rap for their misplaced alacrity.

The hurling of expletives at journalists by Congress leader Mani Shankar Aiyar shows that the politician has very low regard for the journalists and is confident of having to suffer no consequences for his flagrant misdemeanour. It also exhibits his unmitigated trust in the Congress party leadership that wouldn’t take any sustained and irreversible action against him. Media journalists would do well to realise that brown-nosing to this apparently abusive politician won’t yield any good, but only encourage him to continue with his scurrilous behaviour.

2019 Lok Sabha elections: Pro incumbency wave, a tectonic shift in the voting pattern of Bengal and high voter turnouts

As Lok Sabha elections reach its final stage, if the voter turnout and on-ground pulse is anything to go by, there does not seem to be a massive anti-incumbency being reflected right now. The estimated voter turnout in the sixth and penultimate phase of voting which took place on Sunday, May 12, was 64.59% with West Bengal registering as high as 84.50% participation.

Speaking on the voter turnout and what it could mean, Pradip Bhandari, Jan Ki Baat founder who anchors ‘Lalkar’ on Republic TV, said that vote-share-seat-share theory is a big bogus one propagated by lazy commentators who don’t want to come out of their drawing rooms. He said that while there is no direct correlation between voter turnout and election outcome, at best the voter turnout could reflect the mood of the nation.

“The voting outcome has largely been the same as it had been in 2014, except in Delhi where among other things, the voter turnout in the Muslim-dominated area has been comparatively lesser. This could be because the outcome value of Muslim voter in Delhi has reduced, which has discouraged some of them. This neutralising of the vote has been an unprecedented development,” said Bhandari.

Commenting on the difference between voter motivation in Bengal in 2014 vs 2019, he said, “The 2019 Bengal voter is not the same as 2014 voter. The voter is voting for a decisive reason despite violence in many places. In 2014, Bengal voted to ensure Mamata gets a majority. In 2019, the same cannot be said.”

It was reported that Hindus were being stopped from casting their votes in Medinipur constituency whereas one BJP worker was found dead on the day of the voting and two other BJP workers were shot at. Bhandari said that the last phase of voting in Bengal will be most crucial.

“In Madhya Pradesh, the voter turnout has been quite good, similar on the lines of 2014. It could suggest different things in different places. Like, motivation for a higher voting percentage in Guna is different from the motivation for high voting percentage in Bhopal. Bhopal always has polarised elections. Berasia and Sehore assembly seats will decide the fate of Bhopal seat where Congress has fielded Digvijaya Singh against Sadhvi Pragya of BJP,” Bhandari said. Digvijaya Singh, however, was engrossed in voting in Bhopal, where he has contested against BJP’s Sadhvi Pragya, and could not cast his vote.

Uttar Pradesh, which is pegged as the deciding factor in general elections may not see the Mahagathbandhan sweeping the state. “For gathbandhan to do good, it has to be either extremely low turnout or extremely high turnout. Neutral voter (or floating voter) perspective also needs to be taken into consideration. If the neutral voter chooses to go for welfare and leadership, the caste factor may not play an important role in the outcome. While gathbandhan has made a strong case on paper, how much of it is reflected on the ground, one can only wait and watch,” Bhandari said. Uttar Pradesh also saw a minuscule increase in voter percentage in the 14 constituencies which cast their vote on Sunday.

Another place which will show a decisive result will be Haryana. Trends reflect that there has been a Jat vs anti-Jat fight like in 2014 but it has only polarised now. Rohtak and Sonipat will throw surprises Bhandari said.

The overall voter turnout in the sixth phase of polling was down by 2.96% as compared to 2014.

The seventh and the final phase of polling will take place on Sunday, May 19 which again has 59 seats going to polls including Varanasi from where PM Modi is seeking his second term. In 2014, the BJP had won 33 out of these 59 seats, which brought up the tally to 282 helping BJP come out as the single largest party in over 30 years.

The counting of ballots will take place on Thursday, May 23.

Note: Above percentages are estimates and the actual percentage may slightly vary.

Kolkata: Political blame-game continues over Vidyasagar statue, issue being used to fuel regional chauvinism by TMC

Kolkata was abuzz on Tuesday evening after news started pouring in that status of Ishwar Chandra Vidyasagar at Vidyasagar College in North Kolkata was vandalized by miscreants. Since then, both parties have been blaming each other for the incident.

Supporters of both parties are blaming each other as well and CPI(M) has sided with the TMC on the matter. Neutrals are not quite sure about who’s responsible but they appear to be more suspicious of the TMC than the BJP.

The smashing of the statue was only the culmination of a chain of events that began with TMC’s attack on BJP President Amit Shah’s rally. The BJP supporters were attacked with sticks and stones when they were passing by the Vidyasagar college and probably boosted by Amit Shah’s presence at the scene, they returned the favour with gusto. Full blown clashes broke out between the two parties and vehicles were set on fire. In the midst of the raging chaos, the Vidyasagar statue was smashed as well.

There are several versions of events doing the rounds. According to the screenshot of a Facebook post by one Biraj Narayan Roy that has gone viral, the incident was orchestrated by Trinamool itself. Roy, who claims to be a student of the University and an eyewitness, calls it disgusting politics and blames Trinamool for the entire mess. He claims it was virtually impossible for the BJP Karyakartas to reach the place where the Status was. He says it was smashed by Trinamool itself, then the media was summoned and the BJP blamed through it.

Trinamool supporters and Communists are contesting Roy’s version of events by claiming that he is an ex-student of the University and is currently associated with the BJP IT Cell. Although they haven’t really provided any evidence for the IT Cell allegation, the narrative appears to be sticking with people who are averse to the BJP.

There are numerous videos of the incident doing the rounds of social media as well. One particular video captures miscreants vandalizing the statue. A 2-minute 44-second video that is available on the internet purportedly shows the events that transpired last night. The interesting thing to note on the video is that there’s nothing to suggest that the crime was committed by members of either party. Quite clearly, the miscreants are not wearing any saffron garb or carrying any BJP flags or chanting ‘Jai Shri Ram’. Therefore, it’s unclear why people are so quick to blame the BJP for the mess.

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w7RrmNvD4Hk]One should note at this point, the BJP was participating in a rally when the clashes broke out. Therefore, it’s to be expected that they would be in clothes that displayed their party affiliation. However, in the above video, no such thing is observed. Therefore, the lack of political symbolism on the garments of the perpetrators may indicate which political party is to truly blame for this.

Alleging conspiracy on the part of Trinamool, Amit Shah said in a press conference today, “How could we, outside the locked gate, be present and break a statute inside rooms of the university? Isn’t it a fact that only TMC supporters were on the other side of the gate (inside university)?”

Interestingly enough, Shah’s arguments were being made by people who maintain a neutral stance in politics as well yesterday itself. This OpIndia.com journalist was told by an acquaintance, who happens to be a student in a college at Kolkata, late into Tuesday night, “In order to reach the statue, one has to go through two gates, one metallic and the other one wooden. Bjp karyakartas failed to enter the premises as the entrance was locked from inside. Thus, there is a high probability that people (TMC) inside the building might have denigrated the statue to further their narrative.”

Another individual, who passed out from the University of Calcutta last year, told this journalist, “It does not make sense for the BJP to do it. Why will they dig their own grave with polling to be held on Sunday? I am not a BJP supporter but the thing looks staged. My dad thinks it’s a conspiracy by TMC as well, by Mamata especially. I don’t quite know what to think but people around me certainly seem convinced that Trinamool is responsible for this.”

There are others who are disgusted with politics itself after what happened yesterday. “I am appalled. I don’t put it beyond either party to do it, all of them are capable of such things. I don’t trust any of them,” said another person. There are other people who are voicing similar sentiments. “It’s all a drama and the drama has reached sickening levels,” appears to be the predominant sentiment among significant sections.

Thus, despite the narrative that is currently being peddled by a certain set of people on social media, the vandalizing of the Vidyasagar statue is unlikely to impact BJP’s prospects in the last phase of the Lok Sabha elections in the state in any significant manner. The BJP is in contention in 3 or 4 seats out of the 7 in Kolkata and they will still be in it come polling day.

If anything, it may well work against the Trinamool Congress. There is a general sentiment among people here, both on social media and outside of it, that law and order is the primary responsibility of the state police. And they were unable to stop it before things escalated as has become the norm for quite some time. Therefore, Mamata Banerjee may have to face consequences at the polls for her police’s inability to maintain law and order.

Trinamool supporters and Communists but Trinamool, especially, are playing with fire as well by trying to further a narrative that the violence was organized by people who came from Uttar Pradesh and Bihar to attack Bengalis and statues of Bengali icons. This dangerous brand of regional chauvinism, hitherto not endorsed by any political party in West Bengal, is fast being mainstreamed for political gains. While it is still too early to predict whether the party will have any success, it can be said for certain that efforts are being made towards that end.


Unfortunately for the TMC, however, as its victory in Tripura shows, the BJP is now no longer seen as a party of North Indians alone. Thus, conversations on social media are abundantly available where the BJP is branded as a North Indian party with abusive words for Biharis and Gujaratis and people from Uttar Pradesh thrown in between. And almost as a pattern, a bunch of people from the said communities with their Bengali friends answer these regional chauvinists in kind.

Thus, a distinct possibility that the statue of Ishwar Chandra Vidyasagar, a Bengali icon, was vandalized by Trinamool supporters themselves to alienate the BJP from Bengali culture in the minds of the voters cannot be ruled out.

When an issue gets as politicized as the current matter has, facts take a back seat. Therefore, people averse to Trinamool are blaming them for it, those averse to the BJP are blaming them, those neutral will either judge the matter based on the track record of the parties involved or ignore it entirely when they go to vote. Thus, it doesn’t appear that it will have any significant impact in the polls at all.

Kashmir leaders request people to end protests over rape of 3-year-old girl as it may trigger Shia-Sunni tension

Following the widespread protests in Jammu and Kashmir over the rape of a three-year-old girl on 9th May, the Shia-Sunni Coordination Committee (SSCC) has called for an immediate end of protests to prevent Shia-Sunni tensions. This was done fearing that the protests may turn into communal tension as the victim and accused belong to the two different sects of Islam.

The toddler girl was allegedly raped in Sumbal area of Bandipora district in north Kashmir on May 9 just before Iftar. The child was lured with candy by the accused, then she was abducted to a nearby school and raped. The police have already arrested the accused, who is identified as Tahir Ahmad Mir. But protests erupted after the principal of a local school issued a certificate showing the accused as minor. The protesters also alleged that police were trying to protect Mir by declaring him a minor. A certificate showing the age of the accuse was also being circulated on social media, but police have confirmed that it is fake.

However, the family of accused has denied the charges, saying Mir is framed due to a property dispute between the two families, who belong to two different sects of Muslims.

Anjuman-e-Itehadul Muslimeen, a religio-political organisation of the Shia community in Kashmir valley had called for a bandh in the state on Monday, which saw violence in many places. The protestors clashed with police during the bandh, and many people were injured in the violence, including police personnel.

As the victim and accused belong to different sects, Shina and Sunni, the protests against the rape have the potential to snowball into communal tension. Anticipating such a scenario, members of the Shia-Sunni Coordination Committee urged people to maintain calm and hold back the protests. In a crucial meeting called by the committee held on Tuesday, clerics, civil society activists and trade leader leaders participated. The coordination committee adopted a five-point resolution asking people to maintain peace and brotherhood, and appealed to hold the protests, strikes and shutdowns till police complete its probe.

“We urge people of Kashmir to call off the protests and to wait till police complete its investigations into the gruesome incident that has left Kashmir in a deep shock and pain,” the resolution passed by the SSCC meeting said.

The resolution also said that the administration should complete the probe on a fast-track basis and punish the guilty at the earliest. “We urge state administration to conduct the probe into the brutal rape of three-year-old on fast track basis and to ensure exemplary punishment is given to the culprit involved in the crime,” the resolution said.

The SSCC meeting was conducted after the Deputy Commissioner of Budgam Dr Syed Sehrish Asgar and SP Amod Ashok Nagpur held a meeting with the committee on Monday in the backdrop of protests in the area following the incident. The DC had urged everyone to maintain peace, and had cautioned the members of the committee against any attempt to give it sectarian angle.

Top Shia cleric and Peoples Conference general secretary Molvi Imran Ansari has also appealed people to not give the incident a communal colour. He said that some people are looking at the Bandipora rape case through the prism of Shia-Sunni conflict, but this is an inhumane and barbaric act which should be condemned by all. He also urged the people from both the communities to maintain calm.

Senior Shia leader Aga Syed Hasan Almosvi Alsafvi requested people to not create a Shia-Sunni conflict over the rape case. He said, “there are elements who are keen to see sectarian divide but we should remain watchful and defeat their designs.” He pointed out that Sunni Muslims are also protesting against the heinous crime, and nobody supports the accused. He asked people to bring moral order to the society and appealed to sabotage the designs of those who want to create sectarian differences for their benefits.

India might have to wait till 24th May to find out if PM Modi will be taking oath again if the result comes down to the wire

India is waiting with bated breath to find out who would take oath as the Prime Minister and rule the country for the next five years. While several people say that BJP might get a thumping majority on its own, many are saying that the result might come down to the wire. If the 2019 results do come to the wire, Election Commission says that people of the country might have to wait till 24th May to find out which party would form the government at the centre.

Sanjay Basu, Addition CEO, West Bengal, informed that the final results could be delayed due to the Supreme Court’s latest order to the Election Commission to increase the random verification of VVPAT slips with EVMs to five polling booths per assembly segment in each parliamentary seat. He said that this will extend the counting time by 8 to 10 hours. He said that counting of VVPAT slips, postal ballots and scanning of Electronically Transmitted Postal Ballots System (ETPBS) will only make the process lengthy.

“Our aim is to complete the entire counting accurately and seamlessly. Counting of five polling stations of every assembly segment will be done at one table. So the final result is expected by next day,” the ECI official told IANS.

The votes are to be counted on 23rd May 2019, however, while a decisive result would reveal itself on 23rd itself, if the results are unclear or 2019 turns out to be an election where results are close, India might have to wait till 24th to find out which party would be forming the government.

The popularity of Prime Minister Modi still seems intact as per CVoter popularity ratings. Modi’s nett popularity has only grown this year from a 32.37% on 1st January to 47.39% on 20th April. That is an upswing of nett 15 points in less than 4 months.

According to CVoter polls, Prime Minister Modi, as on 20th April 2019 has a whopping 24.65% lead over Rahul Gandhi. The green graph you see there is the approval rating of PM Modi as compared to Rahul Gandhi. That blue graph that appears miles below the green graph, is that of Rahul Gandhi.

According to the CVoter poll, a whopping 56.43% said that they would want to see Narendra Modi as the Prime Minister. Followed by a 22% for Rahul Gandhi, 0.99% for Sonia Gandhi, 2.71% for Mayawati, 1.41% for Manmohan Singh, 1.67% for Mamata Banerjee, 1.40% for Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, 0.08% for Lalu Yadav, 1.67% for Arvind Kejriwal, 0.15% for Chandrababu Naidu and 4.83% for others.

Mamata Banerjee and her Indian Express interview: If not fixed then what else?

Mamata Banerjee had her interview published in the Indian Express yesterday. I left everything and went for it. I mean there is such a dire need for the rest of the country to know about the intimidating TMC leader. I often think if I could write as freely if I was in the Bengal of today. She has disdain for Centre; resistance to Supreme Court or Election Commission; contempt for institutions such as CBI; indifference to blood on the streets and incarceration for any individual who goes public with anything not to her liking. I mean do you remember how she stopped her vehicle, got out and confronted the crowd who were chanting “Jai Shri Ram”? We have not even come to Priyanka Sharma, put in 14-day custody, for sharing a photo-shopped image (she has now been released on bail with the SC observing that her arrest was prima facie arbitrary).

Frankly, I was extremely disturbed when CBI officials were held “hostage” in a police station for descending on Kolkata police commissioner Rajiv Kumar’s residence. That central forces were brought out to ensure the families of CBI officials were not put to harm. That Mamata Banerjee was physically present as the sordid drama rolled out. She then sat on a dharna, serving bureaucrats and police officials took their seats alongside her, in complete violation of service rules. Supreme Court later finding the allegations against Kolkata police chief as “very, very serious.”

There was dismay when Durga idols were vandalized in Hooghly; that despite High Court ruling, she restricted Durga visarjan on Muharram day; that threat of Islamic jihadists is so real that Islamic State (IS) has announced it has an “emir” in West Bengal. And should we also talk about the alleged scams which probably is the genesis for her angst against Modi and BJP?

When the issue of India’s unity is at stake; whether Bengal could break away one day, whether it could harbour terrorists who would unleash their fury on the rest of the mainland – aren’t these grave enough questions on Indians’ mind? That EC was compelled to spread elections in Bengal to all seven phases; remove a few police officers from election duties; send an observer and finally asked central armed forces to be present in almost the entire Bengal which still hasn’t been able to stop violence and killings, doesn’t it tell you of a state sitting on a time-bomb? That even the media is facing the brunt of violence?

But what do we get in the Indian Express interview? How do you walk so much? How do you eat so little? How she would take up the role of a Prime Minister after the elections (not once but thrice in the interview)? The interview began promisingly enough with questions on Muslim appeasement. But Mamata never replied to it and the question was never pressed again. When political violence is mentioned, Mamata says scattered incidents and the interviewer lets it pass. All we get is how Hindu she is in her beliefs (sic). None of the questions I have mentioned above was even remotely thrown at her. Is this how you define “Journalism of Courage?”

Only if our media wasn’t pliant enough if it had trained its lens on West Bengal and the complete anarchy in the state of West Bengal, things wouldn’t have come to this pass. BJP president Amit Shah was denied permission to hold his rally in Jadavpur. State administration has also denied Shah from landing his helicopter in the constituency. The roadshow that Amit Shah held was marred with violence. Nine remaining constituencies go to poll on Sunday. How do you think the Supreme Court or Election Commission is reacting to this “murder of democracy?”

Why do you think our media and edit-writers are not even pointing fingers at Mamata Banerjee on all the issues they profess to champion about? What do we make out of Shekhar Gupta (“She is meeting ‘fire with fire”) and Rajdeep Sardesai (“What’s the secret of your energy?”), the chasm between their stature and their ethics? Is the media afraid of “Didi” (the very word which affection and respect now have acquired a completely sinister meaning)? And if yes, why? What do we attribute this to? Fear, greed, hatred for Modi or all of it? And who speaks for an individual who dissents.