HomeNews Reports2002 riots case against Maya Kodnani takes a new turn with video evidence and...

2002 riots case against Maya Kodnani takes a new turn with video evidence and Amit Shah’s testimony

BJP President Amit Shah today recorded his statement in sessions court in Ahmedabad as a witness for Maya Kodnani, who is a former state minister accused of leading rioting mobs in 2002 Naroda Gam case. Shah told the court that Kodnani was inside the state assembly at 8:30 am on 28th February, as against in Naroda as she is accused of. Incidentally, a television footage available corroborates this claim:


The BJP President further said that when he was at the Sola Civil Hospital, where the bodies of the Godhra carnage victims was kept, he met Kodnani there. Both had visited the hospital right after the special assembly session held to pay respects to the karsevaks who had died in the carnage.


In 2012, Kodnani was accused and convicted of murder, attempted murder and conspiracy in 2002 riots. While pronouncing the judgement, Judge Jyotsna Yagnik had named Kodnani “a kingpin of riots”. Judge Yagnik had also accused Kodnani of leading the mob and incite them to violence.

Shah’s statement, however, stands as a testimony that perhaps Kodnani was indeed a victim of politics. There have been glaring loopholes in her conviction by Judge Yagnik. Despite video footage of her presence at Gujarat Assembly between 8:30 am to 8:40 am, witnesses for the prosecution had claimed Kodnani was leading a mob in Naroda at 8:30 am as well. As per another witness, Kodnani was distributing swords and other weapons, though at a later time that day.

Interestingly, all these witnesses have named Kodnani for the first time in 2008, six years after the riots took place. Some of the witnesses are also allegedly close to Teesta Setalvad, who has been accused of illegal exhumation of victim bodies and embezzling funds of trust created for helping the riot victims.

Join OpIndia's official WhatsApp channel

  Support Us  

For likes of 'The Wire' who consider 'nationalism' a bad word, there is never paucity of funds. They have a well-oiled international ecosystem that keeps their business running. We need your support to fight them. Please contribute whatever you can afford

OpIndia Staff
OpIndia Staffhttps://www.opindia.com
Staff reporter at OpIndia

Related Articles

Trending now

Madhya Pradesh HC rules that Bhojshala is a Saraswati Temple: Read about the archaeological, historical, scientific and administrative reasons cited in the landmark verdict

The High Court declared the disputed area a Bhojshala with Saraswati Temple, quashed the restrictive portions of the 2003 ASI order, and mandated the creation of a trust for temple administration and Sanskrit education

Arvind Kejriwal and his lackeys are lying, again: Justice Swarna Kanta Sharma didn’t ‘recuse’ herself, she transferred the case because she initiated contempt proceedings....

This episode focuses on a pattern, the weaponisation of public pressure against state institutions, particularly the judiciary. When people with large social media followings launch coordinated campaigns to delegitimise sitting judges, manufacture or manipulate evidence, and publicly refuse to participate in the judicial process, they are not practising Satyagraha. They are systematically undermining public trust in institutions that safeguard ordinary people far more than politicians.
- Advertisement -