Tuesday, March 25, 2025
HomeLawRam Mandir case: New bench to begin hearing tomorrow

Ram Mandir case: New bench to begin hearing tomorrow

In March this year, the Supreme Court had disallowed any new interventions in the case however it admitted the plea of Subramanian Swamy to consider his fundamental right to worship.

A three-judge bench of CJI Ranjan Gogoi, Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Justice K M Joseph will begin the hearing in the Ayodhya case tomorrow and draw the framework of the future proceedings.

Adv Vishnu Jain, who is a party to the case, said that it is possible that this bench may hear the case on a regular basis or a proper bench may be constituted for that matter.

The Ayodhya case has been pending before the court since 2010 and the hearing in the case has not started yet.

On Sept 27, 2018, a three-judge bench of the then CJI Deepak Mishra, Justice Ashok Bhushan and Justice S.K. Abdul Nazir with a 2:1 majority had refused to refer the case to a larger bench. Justice S Abdul Nazeer dissenting with the two judges had said whether a mosque is integral to Islam has to be decided considering religious belief which requires detailed consideration. The order of the court came in response to a challenge by senior advocate Rajeev Dhawan, appearing for the Sunni Waqf Board, to the ruling in Ismail Farokhi case in 1994  wherein the court held that a mosque was not integral to the practice of Islam. He sought that the case be reconsidered by a larger bench before starting final arguments. The court had ordered the constitution of a new bench which will commence hearing from October 29 on a batch of petitions filed by both the sides — Hindu and Muslim stakeholders — challenging the 2010 high court judgement.

In March this year, the Supreme Court had disallowed any new interventions in the case however it admitted the plea of Subramanian Swamy to consider his fundamental right to worship.

Join OpIndia's official WhatsApp channel

  Support Us  

Whether NDTV or 'The Wire', they never have to worry about funds. In name of saving democracy, they get money from various sources. We need your support to fight them. Please contribute whatever you can afford

OpIndia Staff
OpIndia Staffhttps://www.opindia.com
Staff reporter at OpIndia

Related Articles

Trending now

In India, judges appoint themselves, investigate themselves and refuse all attempts at accountability: How reforms have been blocked over the years

The executive's attempts to introduce judicial reforms and increase accountability of judges have yielded no results. When an inquiry is commenced, it is carried out by other judges based on a framework they have set up, resulting in lingering uncertainties and a severe lack of desired impartiality and transparency. This privilege is not extended to anyone else. The judiciary requires and enforces standards of transparency and integrity from everyone except itself.

Surat POCSO court sentences Ashad Altaf to 20 years in prison for raping minor Hindu girl: Breaking down victim statement and court judgement

In the judgment, the court noted that the defence tried to discredit the statement given by the victim’s mother in front of the magistrate, stating that it was different from what she had told the police in her complaint that led to the FIR. The court invoked the principle that “an FIR is not an encyclopaedia.”
- Advertisement -