Home Law SC reserves judgement on Rafale case: Here is all you need to know about the hearing

SC reserves judgement on Rafale case: Here is all you need to know about the hearing

Attorney General argued that Rafale deal was not a matter for judicial intervention

The Rafale saga continued in the Court today after the Government submitted details of the deal in a sealed envelope on November 12. The non-confidential details were shared with the petitioners as well, as per the court order.

Session 1

Prashant Bhushan

Petitioner M.L. Sharma argued that Prime Minister Narendra Modi had announced the deal before negotiations. Senior Supreme Court advocate Prashant Bhushan made the claim that there was no sovereign guarantee from the French side in the deal.

Bhushan also argued that delivery would have been quicker with HAL and this government has only delayed the delivery of the aircraft.

- Ad - - article resumes -

Bhushan also asserted that government’s claims of secrecy regarding pricing is a bogus argument. Bhushan further argued that authorities had abused their authority by awarding the contract to Dassault at inflated prices and by giving offset to Reliance.

Arun Shourie

Arun Shourie claimed that a company with the experience of Dassault would not have chosen Reliance as an offset partner. He further claimed that the Rafale deal was a way for the Franch company to tide over its financial crisis and therefore, they will support whatever the government says. The actual pricing of the aircraft is contrary to that revealed in the Parliament, Shourie added. He further asserted that HAL was perfectly capable of producing Aircraft, rubbishing claims to the contrary. “If HAL can build Sukhoi, why not Rafale?” Shourie asked.

Attorney General for the Government

CJI Ranjan Gogoi wished to meet an officer from the Airforce on the matter. The Attorney General assured that an officer will be there soon. AG Venugopal contended that the French government’s consent is required for producing the pricing documents. He also asserted that it was for the experts to decide what weaponry is to be bought. AG Venugopal also argued that the Rafale Deal wasn’t a matter for judicial intervention as the allegations have their origins in media reports and rumours. The CJI inquired whether the pricing of the previous deal was revealed in public, the Attorney General said that it wasn’t.

Session 2

The second session began with Air Marshall and Air Vice Marshall in the Court. Answering the CJI’s queries, the IAF officers responded that the latest induction to the IAF was the Sukhoi 30 which were “3.5 generation” aircraft while the Rafale jet is a 5th generation aircraft with stealth technology. The IAF officers were then excused by the Court with the words, “It is a different war game here in Court.”

Voicing the arguments of the petitioners, Justice K.M. Joseph asked the AG how could the Prime Minister announce a new deal in April 2015. The CJI interjected and reminded the Justice that as per his own note, the withdrawal processes had begun the previous month. The AG also stated in Court that HAL offered a time slot that was 2.7 times of what Dassault was taking. The Government also has a letter of comfort by France, the AG said. He concluded his arguments by saying that IAF has been reporting the shortage of aircraft as a consequence of which it will be difficult for them to defend the country.

Sanjay Hegde appeals to ‘Judicial Conscience’

In his rejoinder argument, Prashant Bhushan argued that the objective of the intergovernmental agreement was only to eliminate the need for tenders. Sanjay Hegde appealed to the ‘judicial conscience’ of the Court and argued that deviations from the previous deal ought to satisfy it. He also argued that the Rafale deal cannot be termed an intergovernmental agreement and dubbed it a pure commercial contract with a private company.

Judgment reserved

After both sides presented their arguments in the Court, the three Justice bench headed by CJI Ranjan Gogoi reserved its judgment on the petitions seeking a Court-monitored probe into the Rafale deal.

Help Opindia Reach Every Indian. Share This Post
We need your support to survive in the media industry. Please consider paying us for the content we produce:

To know more about these payments, please click here.


Big Story

As Barkha had predicted, the Sibals also blamed the newly-elected Narendra Modi government for the advertisers to back off. Lack of advertising revenues led to deepening of their financial troubles, they claim. 

2019 World Cup Is Here!

Catch the latest on Cricket World Cup as it unfolds, special coverage by Opindia

Proud to be a brand - Made in India?
Now, Advertise on Opindia

Interview: Former RAW officer makes further shocking revelations about Hamid Ansari after alleging that he endangered lives of RAW officers in Iran

In this exclusive interview, Former RAW (Research and Analysis Wing) officer NK Sood makes further revelations about his time in Iran, Hamid Ansari and the vilified scientist Nambi Narayanan
Tiranga TV boots its employees: Here is why they don't deserve any sympathy

I am a journalist and here is why I have absolutely no sympathy for the ones who joined Tiranga TV

News emerged last night that bouncers had been sent to the offices of Tiranga TV as the employees were holding a silent protest in the premises.

Prime Minister Modi, Hindus are under siege, and now is the right time to speak up

PM Modi will still win elections due to sheer inertia and the pathetic state of the country's opposition but the faith that he commands will take a hit and even if it's among a small section of the support base, it would be a travesty
Supreme court judgements - regional languages

Here are 7 bizarre judgments by the Indian Judiciary that highlight the need for urgent reforms

It's not the first time that the rather bizarre tendencies of the Indian Judiciary have been on display. In this article, we revisit some of them.

Kapil Sibal claims Barkha Dutt was sacked before her tweets, won’t be paid anymore, Barkha says Sibal is lying

As Barkha had predicted, the Sibals also blamed the newly-elected Narendra Modi government for the advertisers to back off. Lack of advertising revenues led to deepening of their financial troubles, they claim. 
Karan Thapar tried to impede the construction of the RTR flyover

New RTR flyover finally opens in Delhi: Read how inordinate delays were caused by ‘influential residents’ like Karan Thapar

Prominent journalist Karan Thapar had written a letter to LG opposing the construction of RTR flyover claiming it could become the "matter of life and death"

Barkha Dutt terms Kapil Sibal a ‘Mallya’ for not paying salaries to Tiranga TV employees while enjoying in London

Barkha Dutt slams Kapil Sibal for sacking employees without due compensation, says the Sibals abused the female staffers

Conversion at Karnataka High Court? Islamic proselytising organisation distributed Quran among judges and advocates

Salaam Centre engages in 'Dawah' or the Islamic practice of converting non-Muslims to Muslim.

Aspiring model Khushi Parihar murdered over ‘friendship with other men’, live-in partner Ashraf Sheikh arrested

Aspiring model Khushi Parihar was found murdered with her head and face smashed on Saturday morning at Chatarpur farms, around 50 KMs away from the Nagpur city, her live-in partner Ashraf Sheikh has been arrested

Court asks Ranchi woman to distribute copies of Quran while granting bail over her Facebook post over Tabrez Ansari’s death

A Ranchi Court granted conditional bail to Richa Bharti who is accused of 'hurting religious sentiments' of Muslim community over a Facebook post. She has been asked to distribute copies of the Quran.
Subscribe to Day's Top Stories
- Advertisment -

Latest articles

Connect with us

173,493FansLike
158,495FollowersFollow
74,753SubscribersSubscribe
Help Opindia Reach Every Indian. Share This Post