Home Law In stark contrast to Sabarimala case, SC rejects PIL demanding Muslim women entry into Mosques, ban purdah system

In stark contrast to Sabarimala case, SC rejects PIL demanding Muslim women entry into Mosques, ban purdah system

The latest decision from the Supreme Court comes in stark contrast to the verdict given out by the court in the Sabarimala case. 

The apex court of the court has today dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking permission for Muslim women entry into mosques and placing a ban on the regressive practice of Purdah system, that ordains them to cover their face.

A bench comprising of the Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi and Justices Deepak Gupta and Annirudha Bose questioned the locus standi of the petitioner, saying, “Let a Muslim woman come, then we shall consider this petition.”

The petition was filed in the Supreme Court against the Kerala High Court verdict which rejected the plea. The petitioner, Swamy Dethathreya Sai Swaroop Nath, the President of the Kerala unit of the Akhil Bharatha Hindu Mahasabha had contended in the petition that the Muslim women were not allowed to pray in the mosques and were forced to cover their faces through the enforcement of Purdah system.

- Ad - - article resumes -

In another petition filed by a Pune-based Muslim couple seeking women’s entry into mosques, the country’s top court agreed to hear the petition claiming that it will examine the issue only because of the Sabarimala verdict. The Samastha Kerala Jamiyyathul Ulama, a body of Sunni clerics and scholars had then declared that Muslim women should pray inside their homes and that it is inappropriate for the courts to intervene in the matters pertaining to religion.

However, the latest decision from the Supreme Court comes in stark contrast to the verdict given out by the court in the Sabarimala case.

It is an interesting contention by the court given the fact that none of the petitioners in the Sabarimala was from Kerala and some of them had no knowledge about the customs of the temple. In fact, some of the petitioners wanted to withdraw their pleas after learning that it was a custom limited to one specific temple and women devotees themselves want to follow this custom. The supreme court also had ignored the beliefs of women devotees of the temple.

Help Opindia Reach Every Indian. Share This Post
Support OpIndia by making a monetary contribution

Big Story

Islamist organisation PFI that hosted Hamid Ansari opposes Citizenship Amendment Bill, gives away PoK to Pakistan
PFI that has in the past been embroiled in several cases of Islamic extremism has issued a press note opposing Citizenship Amendment Bill

Don't miss these

2019 World Cup Is Here!

Catch the latest on Cricket World Cup as it unfolds, special coverage by Opindia

Latest articles

Connect with us

189,697FansLike
200,329FollowersFollow
125,000SubscribersSubscribe
Advertisements
Help Opindia Reach Every Indian. Share This Post