Home Law In stark contrast to Sabarimala case, SC rejects PIL demanding Muslim women entry into Mosques, ban purdah system

In stark contrast to Sabarimala case, SC rejects PIL demanding Muslim women entry into Mosques, ban purdah system

The latest decision from the Supreme Court comes in stark contrast to the verdict given out by the court in the Sabarimala case. 

The apex court of the court has today dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking permission for Muslim women entry into mosques and placing a ban on the regressive practice of Purdah system, that ordains them to cover their face.

A bench comprising of the Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi and Justices Deepak Gupta and Annirudha Bose questioned the locus standi of the petitioner, saying, “Let a Muslim woman come, then we shall consider this petition.”

The petition was filed in the Supreme Court against the Kerala High Court verdict which rejected the plea. The petitioner, Swamy Dethathreya Sai Swaroop Nath, the President of the Kerala unit of the Akhil Bharatha Hindu Mahasabha had contended in the petition that the Muslim women were not allowed to pray in the mosques and were forced to cover their faces through the enforcement of Purdah system.

- Ad - - article resumes -

In another petition filed by a Pune-based Muslim couple seeking women’s entry into mosques, the country’s top court agreed to hear the petition claiming that it will examine the issue only because of the Sabarimala verdict. The Samastha Kerala Jamiyyathul Ulama, a body of Sunni clerics and scholars had then declared that Muslim women should pray inside their homes and that it is inappropriate for the courts to intervene in the matters pertaining to religion.

However, the latest decision from the Supreme Court comes in stark contrast to the verdict given out by the court in the Sabarimala case.

It is an interesting contention by the court given the fact that none of the petitioners in the Sabarimala was from Kerala and some of them had no knowledge about the customs of the temple. In fact, some of the petitioners wanted to withdraw their pleas after learning that it was a custom limited to one specific temple and women devotees themselves want to follow this custom. The supreme court also had ignored the beliefs of women devotees of the temple.

Help Opindia Reach Every Indian. Share This Post
We need your support to survive in the media industry. Please consider paying us for the content we produce:

To know more about these payments, please click here.


Big Story

Strange rumours are coming out of Kashmir. Shah Faesal, supposedly, is Doval's stooge.

2019 World Cup Is Here!

Catch the latest on Cricket World Cup as it unfolds, special coverage by Opindia

To Advertise on Opindia.com Click here

Here is why Prannoy Roy and Radhika Roy were stopped at the airport and were not allowed to leave the country

Radhika and Prannoy Roy of NDTV have said that they were not allowed to leave the country because of a concocted ICICI loan case. Read about that case in details

P Chidambaram finally arrested by CBI after officers scale wall of his residence as the gates were locked

Chidambaram arrested from his residence after he addressed a press conference at Congress office

Is Shah Faesal Ajit Doval’s asset? Unlikely, Swati Chaturvedi may be unwittingly helping the central government

Strange rumours are coming out of Kashmir. Shah Faesal, supposedly, is Doval's stooge.

Read full details of new FIR filed by CBI: Prannoy Roy, Radhika Roy and Vikram Chandra accused of criminal conspiracy, cheating and corruption

A new FIR has been filed by the CBI against Prannoy Roy, his wife, Radhika Roy, and former CEO of NDTV, Vikram Chandra in a case related to money laundering.

Poetic Justice: P Chidambaram falsely hounded Amit Shah and Narendra Modi, now he is on the run for his own transgressions

When P. Chidambaram was the Union Home Minister, Amit Shah was unceremoniously arrested and slapped with charges of murder, extortion, and kidnapping among others over the Sohrabuddin encounter case.

The Zomato controversy: Their business plan, the dispute and a dark tale of greed, exploitation and fear

The controversy stems from deep discounting, favouritism, monopolistic trade practices amongst others, creating a rift between the delivery platforms like Zomato and Restaurateurs

All that Pakistan is left with is a war of misinformation: Here are the myths and propaganda about Kashmir

Pakistan has gone to the two of the most dangerous forces for support- A fanatic faith and cruel communism, latter being more fanatic than the former.

You are a glorified broker who takes all the credit for our product: Restaurateur rips Zomato apart in an open letter

'You are merely a delivery agency. It is not your product. Just do your job and deliver the food', restaurant owner writes to Zomato

19 hours and counting: P Chidambaram abandoned his driver after leaving SC, phone switched off, untraceable since then

Earlier today, a lookout circular was issued against Chidambaram after he was refused interim relief from the Supreme Court.

Dear Mao-Lenin crossbreed left-liberal gang, had you done journalism properly, we wouldn’t exist

Dear mainstream media, If YOU hadn't sold your pen, we wouldn’t have to pick ours
Subscribe to Day's Top Stories
[newsletter_form type="minimal"]
- Advertisment -

Latest articles

Connect with us

181,034FansLike
171,624FollowersFollow
90,109SubscribersSubscribe
Help Opindia Reach Every Indian. Share This Post