HomeNews ReportsKerala: Muhammed H. sentenced to 101 years of jail for sexually assaulting his minor...

Kerala: Muhammed H. sentenced to 101 years of jail for sexually assaulting his minor daughter; he used to tell her, “All fathers do this to their daughters”

The convict, Muhammed, would rationalise the sexual assault to his daughter saying that all fathers did it to their daughters, Law Beat India reported.

A man named Muhammed H was awarded 101 years of jail by a Kerala court for sexually exploiting his minor daughter for over six years.

The girl was raped by Muhammed for six years and was finally impregnated at the age of 16, which subsequently brought to the fore her assault at the hands of her father. The convict, Muhammed, would rationalise the sexual assault to his daughter saying that all fathers did it to their daughters, Law Beat India reported.

Taking strict action against the culprit, the Kerala Court jailed Muhammed to 101 years in jail along with life imprisonment, noting that he deserved ‘no mercy’.

Join OpIndia's official WhatsApp channel

  Support Us  

For likes of 'The Wire' who consider 'nationalism' a bad word, there is never paucity of funds. They have a well-oiled international ecosystem that keeps their business running. We need your support to fight them. Please contribute whatever you can afford

OpIndia Staff
OpIndia Staffhttps://www.opindia.com
Staff reporter at OpIndia

Related Articles

Trending now

Mocking Maa Sita’s birth, sexual innuendos on Lord Krishna’s parents: Hindus demand action against Ambedkarite activist Satish Bauddh for vile, derogatory comments at Delhi...

During an event commemorating Bhim Rao Ambedkar’s birthday, Satish Bauddh delivered a speech wherein he began with the usual hateful commentary against the ‘Manuwadi ideology’, caste, and superstition, to incite Dalit Hindus to convert to Buddhism. However, he soon pivoted to spewing vitriol against Hindu deities, scriptures and beliefs.

Congress-linked advocate Muhammad Ali Khan gets X users to delete tweets, read why the court should not have issued this order

Court called tweets prima facie derogatory and issued interim restraint without hearing defendants. Plaintiffs cited threats. OpIndia says order is not final and raises concerns about broad restrictions affecting independent reporting and public interest journalism.
- Advertisement -