Sunday, March 16, 2025
HomeNews ReportsMadras High Court asks Bharat Hindu Munnani to change location for holding protest relating...

Madras High Court asks Bharat Hindu Munnani to change location for holding protest relating to the Thiruparankundram hill issue

The petition was filed by the vice-president of Hindu Bharat Munnani, S Yuvarah after the Tamil Nadu government refused to grant permission to hold the protest rally. Appearing for the Tamil Nadu government, Special Public Prosecutor (SPP) Hasan Mohamed Jinnah opposed the petition calling it an attempt to disrupt peace and religious harmony.

During the hearing of a matter relating to the Thiruparankundram hill issue on Wednesday (12th February), the Madras High Court questioned the Hindu organisation Bharat Hindu Munnani over its petition seeking a direction to police to grant permission for staging a protest in Park Town of Chennai on February 18.

A bench of Justice GK Ilanthiraiyan reportedly questioned the Hindu outfit why it wanted to hold protest in a ‘congested part’ of the city. The court asked the petitioners to suggest an alternative location to stage the protest. The organisation was seeking permission to hold the protest rally carrying vel (spear) and chanting Bhakti songs starting from Egambareswarar Temple passing through Rasappa Street to Muthukumarasami Kovil Devasthanam and Thanga Salai.

The petition was filed by the vice-president of Hindu Bharat Munnani, S Yuvarah after the Tamil Nadu government refused to grant permission to hold the protest rally. Appearing for the Tamil Nadu government, Special Public Prosecutor (SPP) Hasan Mohamed Jinnah opposed the petition calling it an attempt to disrupt peace and religious harmony.

Jinnah submitted that the state government would not allow anyone to disrupt peace and would ensure that religious sentiments and beliefs of either community are not harmed. The SPP argued that granting permission for the protest would disturb the communal harmony. Communal tensions have been flaring up over the Thiruparankundram hill which houses Thiruparankundram Subramaniyaswamy temple and the Sulthan Sikkandhar Avulia Dargah.

The SPP contended before the court that worship rights over the hill were settled before Independence by the courts. He said that a report was presentd before the court stating that “the practice of animal sacrifice and consumption of meat as form of worship exists as a tradition and is followed by the Muslim community”.

Background of theThiruparankundram hill issue

In December last year, a Muslim was detained by the police for attempting to take livestock on the hill for sacrifice at the Dargah. As a result, several people from the Muslim community protested against it. Another protest was held last month in January by Muslims demanded free access to the hill. Later on 18th January, a scuffle erupted between the police and members from Muslim community after the latter planned to sacrifice goats and chickens at the Dargah in a Sammanboj organised by the SDPI. Their plan was also resisted by Bharat Hindu Munnani. The police had allowed Muslims to carry cooked meat to the Dargah and consume it there. Sacrificing of animals was not allowed considering that the hill has the presence of ancient Jain caves and Lord Murugan temple.

The Muslims have been claiming the entire hill as the Waqf property and demanding the continuation of animal sacrifice calling it an old tradition. They even named the hill as ‘Sikandar Hills’.

A massive protest was organised by Bharat Hindu Mannani on 4th February at Madurai’s Palakkanatham over the ‘ownership’ issue of the hill.

Join OpIndia's official WhatsApp channel

  Support Us  

Whether NDTV or 'The Wire', they never have to worry about funds. In name of saving democracy, they get money from various sources. We need your support to fight them. Please contribute whatever you can afford

OpIndia Staff
OpIndia Staffhttps://www.opindia.com
Staff reporter at OpIndia

Related Articles

Trending now

Canada: Justin Trudeau govt releases ‘Islamophobia guide’ to appease Muslims, downplays the meaning of ‘Jihad’ and dubs it ‘racist’ to criticise pro-Hamas activism

Muslims constitute roughly 5% of the population of Canada, thereby making Islam the second-largest religion in the country. Justin Trudeau created the role of a Special Representative on Combatting Islamophobia in 2023 to appease Muslims.

Who is Raphael Satter? The Reuters journalist who has sued GoI over OCI revocation: History, court case, baseless reports and more

The revocation of an OCI card, which was a privilege in the first place, does not mean that he cannot apply for a regular visa. He has the right to apply for a visa to visit his family in India after categorically declaring that he will follow all visa rules.
- Advertisement -