Home Blog Page 151

Uttar Pradesh: Gorakhpur police arrest two for luring Hindu women to convert to Christianity; Read what FIR details

Anurag
-
0
Uttar Pradesh: Gorakhpur police arrest two for luring Hindu women to convert to Christianity; Read what FIR details

On 5th December, Gorakhpur Police arrested two individuals, including a woman, for attempting to coerce and entice Hindu women into converting to Christianity. The incident took place in Brahmsari village under Belghat police station limits. According to media reports, the incident took place during a family ceremony. OpIndia accessed the FIR registered in the matter.

Attempt to convert around 30 women

A Mundan ceremony was being held at the house of a woman named Sita Devi. She told media that the accused arrived in the village on Thursday during her grandson’s Mundan ceremony. They gathered around 30 women from economically weaker families. They promised a more comfortable life, cash benefits, relief from suffering and freedom from adversity if the women agreed to convert to Christianity. When some of the women objected, the accused reportedly attempted to intimidate them.

Members of Bajrang Dal were informed about the incident who rushed to the village. Police were called and an FIR was registered based on the complaint of a Bajrang Dal activist. Two accused, identified as Pradeep Kumar and Rina Devi of Deoria, were arrested by the police. They were presented before the court on Friday and remanded to judicial custody.

What the FIR says

The FIR has been registered on the complaint of Bittu Jaiswal, district co-convenor of Bajrang Dal Gorakhpur Rural, under Sections 318, 61 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), and Sections 3 and 5(1) of the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act, 2021.

Source: UP Police

In his complaint, Jaiswal said that he received information from Vishwa Hindu Parishad’s (VHP) divisional organisation minister Nikhil Tomari about the conversion activity taking place in the Harijan settlement of Brahmsari village.

He said that Pradeep and Rina gathered around 25-40 women at Sita’s house and created “psychological pressure” by offering comfort, cash, divine blessings and the promise of liberation from hardship. The accused were promoting Christianity using a Bible, leading prayers and threatening women who refused to comply. Many of the women present were from Scheduled Caste communities.

Source: UP Police

Jaiswal said that the accused were “pretending to serve the community” while attempting to convert women for their “conspiracy”. He added that such activities could lead vulnerable women to abandon Hinduism which is harmful to social and national interest.

Speaking to media, Station House Officer (SHO) of Belghat Police Station, Vikas Nath, said that the matter is extremely sensitive and the allegations are serious. Police are examining if more individuals were involved in the operation. Further investigation into the matter is underway and action will follow based on evidence uncovered during the probe.

How the Left expects judges to break the law to shield Jihadis, but bay for their blood when Hindu rights are protected according to the law: The curious case of CJI Suryakant

Aditi
-
0
How the Left expects judges to break the law to shield Jihadis, but bay for their blood when Hindu rights are protected according to the law: The curious case of CJI Suryakant

Chief Justice of India Surya Kant recently came under fire from the Leftist cabal for his strong remarks made against the illegal Rohingya immigrants during a Supreme Court hearing on 2nd December. While hearing a case relating to illegal Rohingya immigrants, a bench comprising CJI Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi questioned whether the judiciary is expected to give special treatment to people who entered the country illegally.

Terming the illegal Rohingya immigrants as intruders, the CJI asked if the country’s own poor children are not more entitled to essential services like food and water than the illegal immigrants. In light of intelligence reports, the bench flagged the concerns regarding the national security risks posed by these illegal immigrants.

Why CJI Surya Kant’s remarks about illegal Rohingyas are correct

During the hearing of the case, the bench highlighted that Rohingyas have not been declared as refugees by the government of India, and therefore, they are intruders, whom the government is not obliged to keep. “Where is the order of the Government of India declaring them as refugees? Refugee is a well-defined legal term, and there is a prescribed authority by the Government to declare them. If there is no legal status of a refugee, and somebody is an intruder, and he enters illegally, do we have an obligation to keep that fellow here?” the bench questioned.

“You enter illegally by cutting a fence or through a tunnel, and then say that now that you have entered, you are entitled to all rights – notice, food, and even rights for your children. We also have poor people in this country. Are they not entitled to certain benefits and privileges? Should we give these benefits to others instead?” the CJI added.

Pertinently, the Indian government, which has not signed the UN Refugee Convention, does not recognise the Rohingyas as refugees. As a result, the government does not have an obligation to offer them shelter and other essential services. These illegal Rohingya immigrants enter the Indian territory in violation of the law through hidden and illegal routes and discreetly settle here. Illegal immigrants strain the already limited resources of the country, which has a considerable population below the poverty line.

While the so-called human rights activists and liberals portray these illegal Rohingyas as an innocent persecuted minority seeking shelter in India, in reality, they pose a serious threat to the internal as well as external security of the country. Illegal Rohingya immigrants have been found to be involved in several criminal activities, including an international human trafficking syndicate, cattle smuggling, prostitution, and anti-government riots. In addition to that, an increasing presence of illegal Rohingyas has raised concerns regarding demographic changes in several states, including West Bengal, Jammu & Kashmir and Punjab.

How a bunch of Left Liberals went after CJI Surya Kant

However, the Left Liberal gang chooses to turn a blind eye to the overwhelming evidence that discloses that illegal Rohingya immigrants are a serious threat to the country because it suits their anti-India agenda. That is the reason that when the CJI pointed out a bitter reality about illegal Rohingyas, it triggered a massive Left Liberal meltdown.

Just three days after the 2nd December hearing, a bunch of retired judges, senior advocates, and leftist activists, with their hearts bleeding for the intruders, launched a scathing attack against CJI Surya Kant. The gang, which included the CJAR (Campaign for Judicial Accountability and Reforms) of activist-lawyer Prashant Bhushan, wrote an open letter expressing concerns regarding the CJI’s “unconscionable remarks” made during the hearing of the Rohingya case. The letter, signed by over 30 Rohingya well-wishers, claimed that the remarks of the Chief Justice of India dehumanised the Rohingyas and eroded public trust in the judiciary’s commitment to human dignity.

The Left Liberals want to use the legal system to their convenience

Clearly, facts or the legality of the Supreme Court’s observations take a backseat when they do not serve the set agendas of the Left Liberal cabal. For them, the ‘human rights’ of these parasitic intruders take precedence over the basic rights of the citizens of the country who toil hard and contribute to the stability and growth of the country. Be the tall principles of morality, humanity, or legality or the democratic institutions like the judiciary, they are all mere tools for the Left Liberal gang to further their agenda and can be shunned the moment they fail to serve it. Their definition of right and wrong changes based on their end goal.

This is the reason that CJI Surya Kant, who is now facing the wrath of the entire Left Liberal ecosystem, became its hero overnight after he made some insidious remarks, which were bad in law, against the former BJP spokesperson Nupur Sharma. The remarks of CJI Surya Kant (then a puisne judge) were used by the Left Liberals to legitimise the hounding of Nupur Sharma by Jihadists, who gave open threats of beheading, raping and killing her for merely quoting an excerpt from the Islamic Hadith during a TV show in 2022. The incident not only proved catastrophic for Sharma but also cost many people, who voiced their support for her on social media, their lives.

The same Left Liberals hailed the Supreme Court’s comments about Nupur Sharma

The BJP leader had approached the Supreme Court, requesting it to club the multiple vexatious FIRs filed against her in different states, and to transfer them to Delhi as she was facing threats to her life. However, the Supreme Court, despite having provided similar relief in several other cases, berated Sharma and made grossly inappropriate remarks against her, prejudicing her case. The bench, comprising CJI Surya Kant and Justice JB Pardiwala, downplayed threats to Sharma’s life and said, “She has a threat or she has become a security threat? The way she has ignited emotions across the country this lady is single-handedly responsible for what is happening in the country”.

The Court blamed Sharma’s “loose tongue” as the reason for her remarks on the Prophet Muhammad being deemed “blasphemous” by Islamists. In a manner not suited to the highest judicial institution of the country, the Court blamed Sharma for the chaos unleashed across the country and said that she owed the country an apology. The remarks of the Supreme Court had the effect of declaring Sharma guilty without any enquiry, investigation or trial.

At that time, despite the Apex Court’s remarks about Nupur Sharma not being in accordance with the law, the Left Liberals hailed CJI Surya Kant. Lauding the Supreme Court’s comments against Sharma, Congress said that they resonated with the whole country. Similarly, Communist leader Brinda Karat wrote a lengthy editorial pouring her heart out in praise of the Supreme Court for reprimanding Nupur Sharma for her “hate speech”, in which she merely happened to quote some facts. Several such articles were published by the Leftist media portals, celebrating the same CJI Surya Kant, who has now fallen from grace for them, just like former CJI Chandrachud, after he stated the truth about illegal Rohingya immigrants.

This episode exposes a recurring pattern: the same activist groups who hail the judiciary when it endorses their narrative instantly condemn it when the Court upholds India’s security concerns or the rights of the majority community. Their outrage is not about constitutional principles, it is about political convenience.

Islamists weaponise unrelated case of bail to UAPA accused to defend Delhi anti-Hindu riots accused Sharjeel Imam, Umar Khalid: False equivalence, lies and more

Jinit Jain
-
0
Islamists weaponise unrelated case of bail to UAPA accused to defend Delhi anti-Hindu riots accused Sharjeel Imam, Umar Khalid: False equivalence, lies and more

In recent days, a coordinated propaganda effort by Islamist handles on social media attempted to manufacture a false narrative of “Muslim victimhood” by equating an entirely unrelated UAPA case from Assam with the prosecution of the key conspirators behind the 2020 anti-Hindu Delhi riots. The trigger was a Supreme Court order granting bail to one Tonlong Konyak, arrested in 2023 under UAPA for alleged illegal funds possession, after more than two years in custody without a chargesheet.

This legitimate bail decision in an isolated case became a tool for Islamist misinformation.

A troll named Harun Khan posted: “Konyak (non-Muslim) gets bail under UAPA after 2+ years without chargesheet. Umar Khalid doesn’t get bail because he is Muslim.”

Another user ranted: “Need I remind the honourables about Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam, Gulfisha Fatima…?”

And one Razia Masood posted a collage of Delhi riot conspirators, claiming: “Being Muslim is the only reason for not getting justice in this country.”

This narrative is a calculated lie.

Why the Assam case has zero parity with the Delhi riots conspiracy

The effort by Islamist propagandists to draw a comparison between the Assam UAPA bail case and the Delhi riots conspiracy is fundamentally dishonest. In the Assam matter, the reason the Supreme Court granted bail was straightforward: the State failed to file a chargesheet for more than two years. The prolonged incarceration without progress in investigation constituted an undeniable violation of constitutional safeguards. There was no violence alleged, no network of conspirators, and no evidence of a planned upheaval against the nation’s institutions. It was, in essence, a detention based on suspicion that the authorities failed to substantiate within the required timeline.

The situation in the 2020 Delhi anti-Hindu riot conspiracy case is the exact opposite. Here, the prosecution has filed an extensive main chargesheet along with supplementary chargesheets backed by multiple forms of evidence, including digital communications, eyewitness accounts, protected witnesses, public speeches motivating disruption, and the clear timing of the unrest to coincide with a high-profile State visit of the U.S. President.

The courts, after reviewing the material, have concluded that there is a prima facie well-orchestrated conspiracy to trigger large-scale violence, disrupt the capital, and draw international attention by portraying the Indian government as anti-Muslim. Over fifty lives were lost, hundreds were attacked, public and private property was burnt, and citizens lived through days of terror. This is why Section 43D(5) of UAPA, which restricts bail when terrorism-linked conspiracy appears prima facie established, has repeatedly applied against Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam.

Thus, the Assam case is an instance where bail was granted because the State failed to meet its legal responsibility. The Delhi conspiracy case involves accused for whom the law explicitly prevents bail due to the gravity of charges and credible material already on record. The only thing common between the two cases is the mention of UAPA, beyond that, every variable, from the scale of alleged crime to the evidence available and judicial assessment of culpability, is fundamentally different. Equating the two is not just intellectually bankrupt; it is a deliberate attempt to communalise a legal process and create a false narrative that Muslims are persecuted even when the facts, evidence, and court findings prove otherwise.

The false claim of “lawful dissent”

The defence teams for Imam and Khalid have long argued that they were only involved in peaceful, constitutional protest. They claimed that Imam was already in custody before the riots and that Khalid never appeared at riot sites. They dismissed protected witness statements as coerced and insisted that, even if accepted, the allegations amounted only to minor offences under Section 13 of UAPA.

The prosecution, however, demonstrated that the riots were no spontaneous outburst. Khalid and Imam created and coordinated multiple WhatsApp groups after CAB was passed in December 2019. They delivered speeches encouraging road blockades and disruption, circulated pamphlets urging action that would force the government to “bend,” and coordinated with radical networks in universities and Muslim-majority localities. Their goal, according to the State, was to create bloodshed that would invite international condemnation.

The Court found this narrative credible. It emphasized that Khalid and Imam laid the groundwork for the violence, and their physical absence from riot areas did not absolve them. The conspiracy was hatched well before the events and executed through proxies.

Forum shopping and delay: A calculated legal strategy

Islamists on social media push a dramatic question: “How can Umar Khalid still be in jail after five years?” They deliberately avoid the factual answer: his legal team slowed down the judicial process. After the Delhi High Court denied bail in October 2022, Khalid waited nearly six months before approaching the Supreme Court. His lawyers then sought repeated adjournments, resisted specific benches, and even withdrew the petition when rulings appeared likely to go against them.

The High Court has now noted this as forum shopping, shifting courts in search of a favourable bench and then exploiting the resulting delays to argue prolonged incarceration. This strategy became especially visible after a Supreme Court ruling in January 2024 reaffirmed that under UAPA, “jail is the rule and bail is the exception.” Realising the legal climate was against them, Khalid’s lawyers avoided final adjudication.

How co-accused on bail deliberately stalled the trial

The defence repeatedly cited the right to a speedy trial, arguing it was unfair to continue incarceration with 700 witnesses yet to be examined. But records showed that those already released on bail, including Devangana Kalita and Natasha Narwal, actively obstructed commencement of charges by filing objections and disputing completion of investigation. The trial judge himself observed that the accused seemed interested in delaying arguments to later claim bail on grounds of delay.

The Delhi High Court concluded that the delay was not a failure of the judiciary, it was a tactic engineered by the accused camp to manipulate public sentiment and legal timelines. The propaganda narratives online conveniently omit this fact.

The Assam bail case is a story of delayed investigation. The Delhi riots conspiracy case is one of an intentional, pre-planned assault on national order. Equating the two is a deliberate falsehood meant to communalize judicial processes and provoke division.

Sharjeel Imam and Umar Khalid are not in jail because they are Muslims. They are in jail because courts have found their role in a major conspiracy prima facie evident. They are in jail because their lawyers dragged proceedings to avoid unfavourable rulings. They are in jail because when violence is weaponized as politics, accountability must follow.

The truth is clear. Only the propaganda is loud.

Exclusive: Pakistani Hindu activist, known for stopping forced conversion of minor girls, fears for his life as extremists label him ‘anti-Islam’, victim speaks to OpIndia

Dibakar Dutta
-
0
Exclusive: Pakistani Hindu activist, known for stopping forced conversion of minor girls, fears for his life as extremists label him ‘anti-Islam’, victim speaks to OpIndia

The life of Pakistani Hindu activist Shiva Kachhi has been in danger ever since a notorious Islamist outfit, Pir Sarhindi, falsely accused him of being anti-Islam and an ‘Indian agent’ working against the interests of the Pakistani State.

The matter came to light on Tuesday (2nd December) after Shiva took to X (formerly Twitter) to narrate his ordeal.

“My life is in danger. Those involved in forcibly converting Hindu girls — the Sarhindi group — are falsely accusing me of being anti-Islam and anti-state. They want to have me killed just like Dr. Shahnawaz Kumbhar,” he stated.

“My only ‘crime’ is that I raise my voice for Sindhi Hindu girls. I have supported them and have already reunited dozens of abducted girls — who were forcibly converted after abduction — with their families,” the Hindu activist pointed out.

While seeking help from the State and law enforcement authorities, he further added, “We have always protested, at both the national and international level, against the increasing incidents of abduction and forced religious conversion of underage girls.”

Shiva Kachhi runs an NGO by the name of ‘Darawer Ittehad Pakistan’, which works for the interests and rights of minorities in Sindh province of Pakistan. He boasts of 17k followers on X (formerly Twitter).

Pakistani Hindu activist speaks to OpIndia

After learning about the matter, OpIndia reached out to the Hindu activist. Shiva Kachhi agreed to speak to us over a telephonic call.

“I have been working to stop the forced conversion of minor Hindu girls since 2018. I have recovered many victims, ensured their return to Faith (ghar wapsi) and handed them over to their parents safely,” he told OpIndia.

“As such, notorious groups involved in the business of forced conversion have time and again labelled me as ‘anti-islam’ and ‘anti-Pakistan.’ This has happened to me multiple times over the course of the last 7 years,” he further added.

On being asked about the severity of the situation, Shiva Kachhi informed, “The situation is different this time. There are two large outfits involved in forced conversion and marriages of minor girls in Sindh. One is run by Miya Mithu and another by this Pir Sarhindi group.”

Shiva Kachhi at his office in Sindh

“About 2 weeks ago, an underage Hindu girl named Sonia was abducted, forcibly converted to Islam and married off to a Muslim man. I helped register a case against Pir Ajaz Sarhindi, who conducted the nikkah of the child. Ever since then, the Pir Sarhindi group has been hounding me,” the Hindu activist stated.

He pointed out that one of the men running this outfit, Pir Umar Jan Sarhindi, is an accused in the murder of Shahnawaz Kumbhar. For the unversed, Shahnawaz was a doctor in Sindh who was killed over allegations of blasphemy in September 2024.

Shiva Kachhi now fears for his safety and security as the ‘Pir Sarhindi’ group is more influential and dangerous than the ones he has confronted to date. He is now being falsely labelled as ‘anti-Islam’ for objecting to the forced conversion of minor Hindu girls to Islam.

“The truth is that I have never made any comments against Islam or other Faiths,” the activist stated.

Given that he is a Hindu by Faith, the activist is also being smeared as ‘anti-Pakistani working for Indian interests.’

Shiva Kachhi has filed a complaint with the police regarding the threats issued agaisnt him by the Pir Sarhindi group and its members Pir Shah Jahan Sarhindi and Pir Ayyub Jan Sarhindi.

Who was Major Mohit Sharma, the Indian Army Braveheart who infiltrated terror outfit Hizbul Mujahideen and killed dreaded terrorists

Aditi
-
0
Who was Major Mohit Sharma, the Indian Army Braveheart who infiltrated terror outfit Hizbul Mujahideen and killed dreaded terrorists

The name of Major Mohit Sharma was etched in the collective memory of the country forever on March 21, 2009, when the braveheart soldier laid down his life in the service of the nation during a military operation in Kupwara District of North Kashmir. Major Sharma, who was part of several key operations of the Indian Armed Forces, is a legend whose stories of valour and patriotism continue to inspire generations of Indians.

Early life and childhood of Major Sharma

Major Mohit Sharma was born in a small town of Rohtak in Haryana in 1978. He was the second child of his parents, Shri Rajendra Prasad Sharma and Smt Sushila Sharma. Fondly called ‘Chintu’ by his family and ‘Mike’ by his college mates, Major Sharma was an extremely bright and exuberant child. He not only excelled in studies, but was also good at playing various musical instruments like guitar, mouth organ and synthesiser. He also possessed impressive singing skills and used to give live performances. After securing good grades in school, he was admitted to Shri Sant Gajanan Maharaj College of Engineering, Shegaon, Maharashtra. However, driven by his passion to join the Armed Forces, he left engineering and joined the National Defence Academy (NDA) in 1995.

At the NDA, Major Sharma excelled in diverse fields and emerged as one of the best cadets. He was a member of the India Squadron and was also a champion Horse Rider, trained under the guidance of Colonel Bhawani Singh, with his favourite horse named “Indira”. In addition to that, Major Sharma was a Boxing champion in the featherweight category and also one of the best swimmers. After joining the Indian Military Academy (IMA), he was appointed as a BCA (Battalion Cadet Adjutant) and was chosen to meet Shri KR Narayanan, then the President of India, at Rashtrapati Bhawan. He graduated from IMA on December 11, 1999 and got commissioned in the 5th Battalion of the Madras Regiment.

Major Mohit Sharma with his wife Colonel (Then Major) Rishima Sharma

Major Sharma’s decorated career in the Armed Forces

Major Mohit Sharma got his first posting at Hyderabad, from where he went to serve with 38 Rashtriya Rifles in Jammu & Kashmir as part of counterinsurgency operations. During his tenure with the Rashtriya Rifles, he was awarded the COAS Commendation Card (Chief of Army Staff Commendation Card) in 2002. His desire to become a para-commando led him to join the prestigious 1 Para Special Forces (Para SF) in June 2003. The battalion is trained to handle the most challenging, covert and high-risk missions of the Army. During his tenure with the battalion, Major Sharma received the Sena Medal for gallantry in 2004. In his brief service of around 10 years in the Armed Forces, Major Sharma participated in some of the most dangerous and daring operations of the security forces.

Major Sharma’s famous covert operation

In his famous covert operation, Major Mohit Sharma successfully infiltrated a Hizbul Mujahideen group in 2004 and eliminated two dreaded terrorists. The operation was executed in Shopian, 50 km south of Kashmir. Major Mohit Sharma managed to establish contact with two Hizbul Mujahideen terrorists, namely, Abu Torara and Abu Sabzar, under the alias of Iftikhar Bhatt. To blend into the terror outfit, Major Sharma completely changed his appearance by growing long hair and keeping a thick beard.

Major Mohit Sharma as ‘Iftikar Bhatt’
(Image via Instagram @major_mohitsharma)

Major Sharma made up a story and convinced the Hizbul terrorists that he wanted to avenge his brother’s killing in 2001 by attacking an Indian Army checkpoint. He sought the help of Torara and Sabzar in avenging his brother’s death. He told the terrorists that he had done the necessary groundwork to carry out the attack and showed them hand-drawn maps of army movement in an unknown hill trail, thus impressing them. He convinced them that he would not return to his village until he had struck an army checkpoint. The terrorists fell into his trap and arranged for a consignment of grenades, besides summoning three other terrorists from a nearby village. All this while, Major Mohit Sharma waited for the right opportunity to kill the terrorists. And finally, the moment arrived when he found the terrorists off guard and shot them dead.

Five years after the covert operation, the valorous Indian Army Officer was killed in action during an anti-terror operation in the Kupwara district in 2009. During the operation, Major Sharma killed two terrorists in a close fight and rescued his colleagues before he was hit with a bullet to the chest. Major Mohit Sharma was awarded India’s highest peacetime gallantry award, the Ashok Chakra posthumously.

Why Major Sharma is in news

Major Mohit Sharma’s name was in the news recently after it was claimed that the Bollywood movie Dhurandhar that released today is based on his life. As the trailer of the movie came out, many people, including Major Mohit Sharma’s family, believed that a character in the movie played by actor Ranveer Singh was inspired by his life. The family moved the Delhi High Court to stop the release of the film, saying that their consent was not taken before making the movie. While no stay order has yet been granted by the High Court on the release of the film, its producer, Aditya Dhar, clarified that the movie is not based on Major Mohit Sharma’s life.

“Hi, sir – our film Dhurandhar is not based on the life of braveheart Major Mohit Sharma AC(P) SM. This is an official clarification. I assure you, if we do make a biopic on Mohit sir in the future, we will do it with full consent and in complete consultation with the family, and in a way that truly honors his sacrifice for the nation and the legacy it has left for all of us,” Dhar wrote on X on 26th November, responding to a post.

Bangladeshi Hindu rights activist exposes over 1,000 incidents of Islamist atrocities on Hindus at UNHCR, tells OpIndia ‘Yunus Aligned with Islamists, India our last hope’

Shraddha Pandey
-
0
Bangladeshi Hindu rights activist exposes over 1,000 incidents of Islamist atrocities on Hindus at UNHCR, tells OpIndia ‘Yunus Aligned with Islamists, India our last hope’

The 5th of August 2024 marked the unceremonious ouster of the Prime Minister of Bangladesh, Sheikh Hasina. The dark day also marked the departure of the safety and dignity of Hindus and other religious minorities as Islamist mobs began singling out Hindus for their religious identity to kill, loot, and rape them, while also vandalising and desecrating their temples and idols.

Speaking at the recently held eighteenth session of the “Forum on Minority Issues” organised by the United Nations Human Rights Commission, Dipan Mitra, the Bangladeshi Hindu rights activist, highlighted incidents of atrocities against Bangladeshi Hindus at the hands of Islamists.

During his speech at the conference held on 28th November, Dipan Mitra, the President of the Bureau of Human Rights & Justice (BHRJ), said that while the minority Hindu, Buddhist, Christian and tribal communities have constantly been subjected to state and social discrimination since Bangladesh’s liberation in 1971, the situation has taken a “terrible shape”. He pointed out that a systematic process of the “ethnic cleansing of minority Hindu, Buddhist, Christian and tribal communities is underway.”

Hundreds of Hindus killed, women raped and forcibly converted to Islam

Highlighting the Islamist crimes against Hindus in Bangladesh, Mitra said that in the last one year, over 183 Hindus have been killed in the last one year. 219 Hindu women have been raped. Thousands of Hindu homes and businesses have been attacked, vandalised, and set on fire in the last year. 78 girls from Hindu and Buddhist minorities were forcibly converted to Islam.

“Attacks on Hindus on charges of blasphemy, occupation of Hindu monasteries and temples have become a daily occurrence in Bangladesh. Attacks on Hindu businessmen’s businesses and extortion are increasing at a massive rate. Not a day goes by when Hindu property is not confiscated, houses are not attacked, vandalized and arson is not committed,” he said.

Back in August 2024, OpIndia had reported numerous verified incidents of target attacks by Muslim mobs on Hindu temples and Hindu houses. At that time, it was Islamo-leftist media outlets like Al Jazeera, New York Times, and DW, among others, that tried to dismiss violence against Hindus as acts of ‘political retribution’ for supporting the Awami League. In reality, however, while there were incidents wherein the mob targeted Hindu leaders of the Awami League, the attacks are not confined to political rivalries or revenge.

Hindu temples were targeted in Natore, Dhamrai in Dhaka, Kalapara in Patuakhali, Shariatpur, and Faridpur, as well as houses in Jessore, Noakhali, Meherpur, Noakhali, Chandpur, and Khulna. Dinajpur saw the vandalisation of 40 Hindu shops.  These incidents unfolded in the initial days after Sheikh Hasina was forced to flee to India on 5th August 2024. Since Muhammad Yunus assumed charge as the advisor to the unelected interim government, Hindus have persistently been subjected to hate, harassment, killings, rape and loot at the hands of Islamists emboldened like never before.

Hindus forcibly removed from jobs in Bangladesh

Speaking at the conference, Dipan Mitra also raised the issue of a systematic campaign being run to expel Hindu officials and teachers from their jobs.

“Election Commission Secretary Ashok Kumar Debnath, Additional Director General of the Primary Education Department Uttam Kumar Das, Press Council Secretary Shyamal Chandra Karmakar. Press Secretary of the Bangladesh Deputy Embassy in Kolkata Ranjan Sen, Counsellor at the High Commission in Canada, Aparna Rani Pal have been dismissed,” he said.

The BHRJ president further stated that in the last year, at least 176 Hindu teachers from various schools, colleges and universities have been forced to resign or dismissed from their jobs.

“Not only that, but Hindus are also being expelled from the Bangladesh Police. More than a hundred police officers have already been dismissed, including Krishnapada Roy. 252 Sub-Inspectors (SIs) who were recommended for final appointment and training at Rajshahi Sarada Police Academy in 2024 have been released. It has also been found that out of these 252, 99 are Hindus, two are Buddhists, and one is Christian,” the Hindu rights activist said.

He also pointed out that the Home Ministry under Muhammad Yunus has instructed IGP Baharul Alam not to appoint any Hindus to the Bangladesh Police

The discrimination extends to paramilitary forces recruitment as well. “In 2025, 693 people were recruited into the paramilitary forces, the Border Guard Bangladesh (BGB), but none of them belonged to a minority group,” he said.

In addition, Hindu doctors have been removed from important positions in various hospitals. “Even a prominent doctor of Bangladesh, Samantalal Sen, has been framed in a false murder case.”

OpIndia reported last year, Islamists in Bangladesh harassed Hindu intellectuals and professionals and forced them to resign from their jobs. Many were pressured to leave Bangladesh solely because of their religious identity. In August 2024 alone, as many as 60 teachers/professors/govt officials, who are Hindus, were forced to resign.

Over the months, the situation has not turned any better for Hindu professionals. In October this year, a Hindu journalist, Liton Kumar Chowdhury, was attacked by a mob in Sitakunda. He was attacked by members of the Asad Bahini group. The Muslim mobsters labelled Liton Kumar Chowdhury an “Awami League Agent” who was spreading “fake news”.

In July this year, Muslim students studying at Chittagong University in Bangladesh harassed a Hindu Professor named Dr Kushal Baran Chakraborty and forcibly stopped his promotion. Muslim students gathered outside the office building in a pre-planned manner and began creating a ruckus. Many of them were members of the radical Islami Chhatra Shibir (ICS), the student wing of Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami.

Freedom of speech of minorities is being stifled in Bangladesh. Atheists, writers, and bloggers are being killed and exiled from the country

The Bureau of Human Rights and Justice (BHRJ) president further stated that minorities in Bangladesh have no right to freedom of speech. Music and dance are being forced to stop all kinds of cultural events.

Notably, it was reported in November this year that the interim government headed by Muhammad Yunus scrapped the posts of assistant teachers for music and physical education in primary schools. The Yunus regime’s decision was a clear attempt at pandering to Islamists, as radical Islamist outfits in Bangladesh had been campaigning for the recruitment of Islamic scholars instead of music teachers.

The Bureau of Human Rights & Justice’s analysis says that since 2013, several secular atheists, writers, bloggers and publishers have been killed or seriously injured by terrorists in Bangladesh. Since 2023, at least 12 freethinkers and bloggers have been killed. Hundreds of secular atheists, writers and bloggers have fled abroad to save their lives.

Chinmoy Krishna Das jailed over bogus charges

At the UNHCR forum, Dipan Mitra highlighted the case of Chinmoy Krishna Das, an ISKCON monk, the spokesperson of Bangladesh’s Sanatan Jagaran Manch and the chief of Pundarik Dham in Chittagong. This was booked under dubious ‘sedition’ charges. However, in reality, he was arrested because of his advocacy for Hindu rights and raising his voice against atrocities being committed against Hindus in the country.

Mitra also drew the Forum’s attention towards attacks on religious places of Hindus and other non-Muslim communities.

“An innocent ISKCON monk, Chinmoy Krishna Das Prabhu, has been detained in prison for a year without any charges. His only crime – he protested the atrocities on minority Hindus and Buddhists. There is no place for non-Muslims in Bangladesh. Hundreds of shrines have been attacked, vandalised and set on fire in the last one year. On January 23, an organisation called the World Sufi Organisation held a press conference at the National Press Club and said that at least 99 shrines have been attacked since August 2024,” he said.

Dipan Mitra demanded the immediate unconditional release of Chinmoy Krishna Das Prabhu. He further stressed that the international community cannot stay silent and needs to speak out and play an active role in protecting Hindu, Buddhist, Christian and indigenous minorities in Bangladesh, as well as in protecting their social, political and religious rights.

Notably, in November this year, the Muhammad Yunus-led regime in Bangladesh arrested prominent Baul singer Abul Sarkar on allegations of making ‘blasphemous’ remarks against Islam and Allah during the course of a musical performance. Arrested on the complaint of one Mufti Mohammed Abdullah. Abul Sarkar was hounded by violent Muslim mobs operating under the banner of ‘Tawhidi Janata‘ and ‘Alems-Ulama’, outside the court premises. Chants of ‘একটাদুইটাবাউলধর, ধইরাধইরাজবাইকর (Pick one Baul at a time and slaughter them)’ rocked through the streets of Manikganj.

In another incident demonstrating Bangladesh’s rapid pivot towards Islamic fanaticism and intolerance, hardline Islamist groups in Bangladesh issued public threats to demolish the revered Mausoleum of Fakir Lalon Shah, the 19th-century mystic poet and spiritual leader whose syncretic philosophy has long symbolized cultural harmony in the region.

Rising ‘militancy’ in Bangladesh

The Hindu rights activist further spoke about the rising extremism and militancy in Bangladesh. He said that during on 5th August 2024, hundreds of militants and criminals escaped from prisons in Bangladesh. “Among the escaped prisoners, 700 criminals, including 70 militants, have not yet been arrested,” he said.

Islamists working on agenda to eradicate indigenous hill tribes

It also pointed out that Islamic jihadists and Bangladeshi Army are colluding to drive out indigenous populations from their native lands. Dipan Mitra mentioned a specific case wherein Bengali Muslim settlers and the army carried out a brutal attack on hill tribes in Khagrachari and Rangamati. “In this barbaric attack, 8 indigenous people were killed and more than a hundred were injured, all of whom were hill tribes,” he said.

He added that 175 shops in Dighinala and at least 200 small and large businesses in Rangamati were damaged. The Islamists also attacked the Chittagong Hill Tracts Regional Council office in Rangamati and burned 9 cars and a motorcycle. In addition, Islamists vandalized and looted the Buddhist religious institution Maitree Vihar.

Yunus is aligned with Jamat-e-Islami to Bangaldesh Islamic country, India is last hope for Bangladeshi Hindus: BHRJ President tells OpIndia

In a conversation with OpIndia, Dipan Mitra said that the situation of Hindus in Bangladesh is worsening day by day. He said that under Yunus regime, Hindus are in the “most vulnerable” situation. Pointing out the blatant Hinduphobia and discrimination under Muhammad Yunus’s rule, Mitra said that for the last one year, “not a single Hindu has been recruited in key government positions.”

The Hindu rights activist further stated that while Hindus and other religious minority groups are specifically targeted for their religious identity by Islamists, Muhammad Yunus repeatedly blames India and Indian media, dismissing the real plight and persecution of Hindus as ‘propaganda’ and ‘exaggeration’.

“[Muhammad] Yunus is totally aligned with Islamist groups to target Hindus. I don’t think he will even let the elections take place next year. Even if he does, he would make sure the Jamaat-e-Islami and its allies come to power. He wants to make Bangladesh a Islamic country,” he said.

Further unpacking Muhammad Yunus’s Islamist agenda, Mitra told OpIndia that after banning Sheikh Hasina’s Awami League from partaking in the coming elections next year, the interim government’s advisor is also try to eliminate the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) from the race for power.

Notably, under Yunus’s watch, the banned anti-India and Islamist outfit Jamaat-e-Islami was unbanned, Islamist leaders were released from jail, while the crackdown on Awami League leaders intensified.

Dipan Mitra said that Yunus has not allowed an ailing former Bangladesh prime minister Begum Khaleda Zia’s son and BNP’s acting chairperson Tarique Rahman to visit Bangladesh to meet his mother. Rahman currently resides in the UK.

He said that while the Yunus regime makes perfunctory gestures to allow Rahman’s return to Bangladesh, it never really facilitates his return.

Meanwhile, Mitra also urged the Indian government to intervene and build pressure on the Yunus regime to protect Hindus instead of aligning with Islamists and dodging accountability. He also stressed that for Bangladeshi Hindus, now only Indian and the Indian government are the last hope.

“India is our last hope. India cannot stay silent. India should think about the situation of Bangladeshi Hindus before its too late. The Islamists want to either kill or convert all Hindus. Afghanistan was once Hindu, Hindus in Pakistan are also struggling for survival, and now Bangladesh is headed the same direction. India must take an initiative to save Bangladeshi Hindus,” he said.

About Dipan Mitra

Dipan Mitra is a Bangladeshi Hindu residing France. He is currently the President of Bureau of Human Rights and Justice. Mitra has also been associated with World Hindu Federation – Bangladesh Chapter as its Secretary General. He also is the coordinator of the WEF-European Union Chapter. In addition, Mitra serves as the Executive Member of South Asian Peoples Forum.

As NCBC recommends removals of 35 groups from Bengal’s Central OBC list, read how Mamata’s TMC govt pursued its votebank agenda amid blatant Muslim appeasement

Rukma Rathore
-
0
As NCBC recommends removals of 35 groups from Bengal’s Central OBC list, read how Mamata’s TMC govt pursued its votebank agenda amid blatant Muslim appeasement

On 2nd December, the central government informed that the National Commission for Backward Classes (NCBC) proposed the withdrawal of 35 communities, majority Muslim, from the Central list of Other Backward Class (OBC) in West Bengal. The important disclosure was made by the Ministry of Social Justice & Empowerment in the Lok Sabha.

NCBC issued its recommendation in January 2025. The panel reviewed 37 groups in 2014, most of which were Muslim communities, that were part of the Central OBC list and suggested that 35 communities be removed. West Bengal initially sought 46 communities for Central OBC classification in 2011, and 37 were approved and notified by the NCBC in 2014. However, the commission later began a re-examination of these entries.

The NCBC’s action transpired after West Bengal’s Chief Secretary repeatedly failed to appear at proceedings on the incorporation of castes and communities on the list. According to the Ministry of Social Justice & Empowerment, the official skipped five scheduled hearings in 2024 amounting to procedural issues and disputes between the state and the commission.

TMC disregards regulations, bypasses proper procedure to include Muslims in OBC list

The blatant Muslim appeasement strategy pursued by the All India Trinamool Congress (AITC or TMC) is neither concealed nor unrecorded. On the contrary, the party is recognised for its extensive efforts to accommodate Muslims, irrespective of any illegality or breaches of norms or regulations.

These actions have been consistently criticised even by the judiciary. On 22nd May 2024, the Calcutta High Court, in a historic verdict, announced the cancellation of OBC certificates issued to 77 groups. The Left and TMC governments have distributed the documents from 5th March 2010 to 11th May 2012.

The TMC government not only persisted with the Muslim appeasement policies of the former Left governments but also intensified them. It implemented the West Bengal Backward Classes (Other than Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes) (Reservation of Vacancies in Services and Posts) Act, 2012, and classified the 77 categories into OBC A (More Backward) and OBC B (Backward).

Four pleas were submitted to the high court, contesting the religiously motivated decision made by the Left and TMC governments on the basis of constitutional validity and different provisions of the act enacted by TMC.

The petitioners charged that the commission established by the West Bengal government to identify OBCs had “illegally” focused exclusively on the Muslim minority. It did not bother comparing the 77 classes to the unreserved categories to figure out if the newly included classes under the OBC fold were “inadequately represented.”

They emphasised that the commission merely surveyed 5% of the population from the 77 classes, rather than the complete population as required under the Indra Sawhney judgement. Additionally, they stressed that the West Bengal commission for Backward Classes Act of 1993 was directly flouted by the sub-classification of the new 77 groups into the OBC-A and OBC-B categories without consulting the body.

Meanwhile, the Department of Anthropology at the University of Calcutta carried out an independent study and produced an executive summary to support the classification of the recently admitted “Muslim” OBCs after the government decided to label a number of classes within the community as “backward.”

The petitioners referred to the “collusion and illegal and unholy nexus between the commission and the state.” They argued that the latter straightaway admitted to acting and recommending classes as OBCs at the direction of the government.

Calcutta High Court exposes glaring shortcomings, fraud and struck down 5 lakh OBC certificates

The case was heard by a bench of Justices Tapabrata Chakraborty and Rajasekhar Mantha, which considered the reasons presented by the West Bengal government and the petitioners. Afterward, the court invalidated 5 lakh OBC certificates issued since 5th March 2010.

The judges highlighted that the controversial Sachar Committee Report was “extensively” relied upon by the West Bengal government. According to the alleged survey, Muslims in India faced harder living conditions than Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs).

The commission, which was established by the West Bengal government, received flak by the court for its leniency in failing to carry out a thorough survey to ascertain the backwardness of the castes included in the OBC category. It emphasised that relying on an outdated Mandal Commission report to update OBC categories between 2011 and 2022 was untenable.

The bench also found that the West Bengal government perpetrated “fraud on the constitutional power of the state” by adopting the aforementioned act and dismissing the commission’s role in designating additional OBCs. It observed that the commission undermined constitutional provisions by include Muslims in the OBC category.

The court further outlined that the University of Calcutta’s Anthropology Department collaborated with the Left government to justify the decision to notify the first set of new OBCs purely on the grounds of religion. It is essential to highlight that the TMC government relied on the same religious foundation to impose the appeasement agenda.

The West Bengal government faced heat by the judges for treating Muslims like “political commodities” and taking advantage of them in order to win elections.

TMC refuses to follow the order, approaches the Supreme Court

Predicatbly, the TMC government refused to adhere to the judgement and approached the Supreme Court after its significant humiliation for following a communal agenda. Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee declared, “We do not accept the ruling that nullified OBC certificates. We will challenge it in a higher court after the summer vacation,” during an election rally in Sagar, South 24 Parganas district.

Nonetheless, the affidavit submitted by her government in the apex court also unveiled a similar story. According to the government, a complicated three-tier procedure that included two surveys and a hearing by the commission for Backward Classes was implemented to broaden the OBC list.

However, it was revealed that for some Muslim groups, the process was completed in less than a day. However, it would have been inconceivable considering the intricate nature of the work and the rate with which government machinery functions. The OBC commission responded at an equally remarkable pace. The subcategorisation survey was conducted before community members applied to the commission to be defined as OBCs, in some cases.

These facts were disclosed after the West Bengal government was ordered by the court to “explain the process” employed in identifying 77 communities as OBC between 2010 and 2012. It also requested information about the type of survey that was undertaken on the two areas of social and educational backwardness and inadequate representation in state services.

Furthermore, the state’s petition to the top court was received with a stern warning that religion cannot be the basis for reservations.

TMC govt introduces new bill, majority reservation to Muslims

The West Bengal government completed another OBC survey in June, that proposed the inclusion of 140 additional sub-groups within the category. It also indicated that the current 17% OBC reservation policy will continue in place. The survey was prepared in accordance with recommendations made by the West Bengal Backward Classes Commission (WBCBC), which was recently approved by the state cabinet.

The OBC reservations are divided into two categories. The first category, known as “OBC A,” offers 10% reservation to 81 communities, 56 of which are Muslim. The second category, “OBC B,” stipulates 7% reservation and contains 99 communities, 41 of which are Muslim. As a result, the state has 97 Muslim communities out of 180 in total. Clearly, a major portion of the total OBC reservation is designated for Muslim populations.

The admission of 76 new communities increased West Bengal’s OBC reservation from 10% to 17%. 64 out of the 66 previously recognised communities had been maintained.

Calcutta High Court blocks new OBC list notification

The Calcutta High Court slapped an interim stay on the preparation and publication of a revised list of OBC in the state, in June. The verdict followed complaints that the additional inclusions have been heavily biased along religious lines, breaking constitutional principles and previous judicial rulings.

The Mamata government’s attempt to restore and expand the OBC list was opposed by the petitioners, especially the inclusion of groups whose previous OBC designation had been overturned by the high court. The uproar grew as the administration increased OBC reservations from 7% to 17% just days before the court’s stay.

The shocking truth of Muslim reservation

There were 66 OBC classes in West Bengal prior to to 2010, the year the TMC came to power. 55 of these were non-Muslim and 11 were Muslim, making up barely 20% of the overall OBC groups at the time. However, the picture shifted substantially by 2025 as the state added 76 new classes to the OBC list.

These were divided into two parts. Part 1 with 51 new classes including 46 Muslim (90%) and Part 2 with 25 classes of which 21 were Muslim (84%). This unambiguously showed that the expansions were heavily biassed towards a particular religious community.

Similarly, the West Bengal Police Recruitment Board produced a recruitment drive merit list that went viral on social media, in 2021. It was aimed to fill state-wide OBC-A vacancies and nearly everyone on the list was a Muslim.

The OBC-A category contained 80 groups, 72 of whom were Muslim and there were around 40 Muslim groups in the OBC-B category. Thus, 112 of the 170 groups mentioned under the category were from the community.

Clearly, it has been repeatedly demonstrated how every rule and principal was disregarded by the Mamata government to unduly favour the Muslim community. However, TMC has not deviated from its malicious agenda despite multiple drubbings.

Mamata Banerjee’s shameless pandering to Muslims

The TMC’s desperate actions to ensure that Muslim communities are classified as OBCs are not unexpected, given the history of the party whose chief openly remarked, “Je goru dudh dei tar lathio khete hoi (if a cow gives milk, one has to be prepared for its kicks also),” in 2019. She essentially indicated that she would continue to appease Muslims as they vote for her and she needs their support to remain in power.

She added, “I like Muslims, no? I will go there (to Iftar parties) a hundred times,” while inviting others. Mamata, elected by the voters of every community, also possesses an uncanny inclination to employ derogatory language, including “kafir” used by Islamists and jihadis, to cater to Muslims.

“Jo darte hai wo marte hai, Jo ladte hai wo Kamyab hote hai, hum darpok nhi hai, hum kafir nhi hai, hum gaddar nhi hai. (Those who get scared end up losing, while those who put up a fight achieve victory, we are not cowards, we are not kafir),” she boasted, last year. The chief minister has repeatedly used the term, even on the day of the Pran Pratishtha of Ramlala to caution people against voting for the Bharatiya Janata Party and while addressing a gathering on the occasion of Eid.

Mamata had even chosen 16th August to mark “Khela Hobe Diwas,” which also happened to be “Direct Action Day,” in order to begin her campaign to oust the BJP from power in several states prior to the polls. Muhammad Ali Jinnah called on Muslims throughout India to mark Direct Action Day, commonly known as the 1946 Calcutta Killings, in which thousands of Hindus were butchered by Islamists from the Muslims Leagues on the streets of Kolkata.

However, Mamata announced that the “Khela Hobe” slogan would now be employed on the national arena and added that “Khela” will henceforth take place in every state till the BJP is expelled from the nation. The policies of her government are simply a reflection of her mindset.

TMC submits to Muslims, sacrifice rights of Hindus

Kolkata Municipal Council abolished the Vishwakarma Puja vacation to extend the Eid holidays, in Februray. The action sparked great controversy and the decision had to be reversed. The government’s tendency to postpone or completely halt significant Hindu festivals in favor of Islamic events is also well-documented.

A Durga Mandir was discovered to be blocked and barricaded in 2023 in Kaliachak town of West Bengal’s Malda district. The development occurred the day before the Islamic month of Muharram.

The Mamata government likewise decided in 2017 that there would be no idol immersion on 1st October as Muharram also fell on that day. This resulted in PILs after which the Calcutta High Court chastised the government and issued a stay order on the decree. The court also reprimanded it for wielding excessive power without justification.

The government later mandated that Durga Puja organisers obtain prior police permissions if they wish to immerse idols on Muharram, possibly in an attempt to get around the ruling. These permissions would also have to be submitted “well in advance.” The TMC politicians were also intended to persuade the Puja organisers not to immerse the idols on that day and make the “right” choice.

TMC government had also restricted idol immersion after 6 pm on Dashami Day in 2016 and 2017 to allow for the observance of Muharram. However, the high court had overturned the 2016 diktat and rebuked the government for “appeasing Muslims.”

The government has similarly turned a blind eye to the unrest perpetrated by the Islamists, whether it occurred in Naihati, where the sound of idol immersion during the Taziya procession and a firecracker provoked them to the extent that they beheaded the Durga idol and wreaked havoc, or the Murshidabad violence targeting Hindus, or the anti-Hindu riots in Malda and any such similar incident in the state.

The protests and demonstrations, marked by unchecked violence, against the Waqf Amendment Act and the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) also reflect the same pattern. TMC MP Kalyan Banerjee had even endorsed Waqf and described it as a “core belief” and a “integral part” of Islam. He added that anyone including Hindus, Muslims, Christians and others, should be entitled to donate land or property to a Waqf Board.

Importantly, TMC leaders, including Mamata Banerjee, have been involved in inciting violence against the policies of the central government and the BJP.

Unbridled hypocrisy and yielding to extremists

The TMC also exhibited alarming double standards in its approach to maintain “communal harmony.” The police from West Bengal traveled to Gurgaon to apprehend 22-year-old Hindu influencer Sharmishta Panoli due to her allegedly objectionable comments. However, it failed to cover a short distance to arrest Wazahat Khan from Kolkata, the individual who lodged the police complaint against Sharmishta Panoli, for his derogatory statements regarding Hindu deities.

Likewise, the clarion call from Mayor Firhad Hakim of Kolkata, a Cabinet Minister and a close confidant of Mamata Banerjee, to convert all non-Muslims to Islam did not disturb the peace and harmony. “Those who were not born into Islam were born with misfortune. If we can give them Dawat (call for proselytism) and bring Iman (Faith) in them, then, we will make Allah happy,” he voiced during “All India Quran Competition,” in 2024.

TMC MLA Humayun Kabir’s announcement regarding the establishment of a purported Babri-style mosque on 6th December was apparently another representation of religious tolerance and brotherhood. He also warned the administration National Highway 34 would be under the control of Muslims, if there were any attempts to prevent the event.

Considering how TMC fosters and defends such elements, which has been consistently evident, including in the Sandeshkhali episode, it is not surprising that party leaders make such statements without fear of repercussions. Vote-bank politics takes precedence over all, including national interest as well as law and order, for the party.

Conclusion

The TMC’s diabolical quest for Muslim votes has driven the party to vehemently oppose the vital Special Intensive Revision (SIR) in Bengal, fully aware that the state has become a sanctuary for illegal immigrants from Bangladesh and its leaders have openly supported these elements.

The party’s outrageous fawning has even even extended beyond India’s boundaries and interests. Thus, the inclusion of the Muslim community in OBC is merely a minor point in the TMC’s overtly appeasement-ridden policies, which have corrupted the phrase “Government of the people, by the people, for the people” by substituting “people” with Muslims.

Vigilant Hindus and proactive organisations thwart conversion bid: Illegal church in Umarpada forced to halt after fierce village resistance — Ground Report

મેઘલસિંહ પરમાર
-
0
Vigilant Hindus and proactive organisations thwart conversion bid: Illegal church in Umarpada forced to halt after fierce village resistance — Ground Report

Illegal Christian conversion has become a burning issue in the eastern region of Gujarat and the Dang and Tapi regions of South Gujarat. The number of churches in areas has mushroomed significantly in the past few years, and most of them have been accused of being involved in illegal conversion. Recently, it came to the knowledge of Hindus in Vahar village, near Umarpada in Surat, that preparations were underway to build a church without obtaining proper permission. The local Hindus strongly protested against the construction of the church and raised the matter with the authorities. As a result, the construction of the church was halted.

Vahar village has a majority Hindu population. The number of people in the villages who converted from Hinduism to Christianity is negligible. Nevertheless, the village priest began preparations to build a church in a field. When the Hindus in the village came to know about the construction of the church, they investigated and found that no permission had been obtained from the Panchayat for the construction, nor had the villagers been informed.

Fearing that the church would promote conversion among villagers, local Hindus, joined by Dev Birsa Sena, a long-active force in the tribal region, lodged strong protests against the upcoming church. Along with village Hindu leaders, Dev Birsa Sena submitted a petition to the Umarpada block administration, opposing the construction of the church and demanding its immediate halt. They also warned to launch a vigorous agitation if appropriate action was not taken.

After opposition by villagers, Christian pastor pledges not to build the church

After receiving the petition of the villagers, the Umarpada Mamlatdar referred the matter to the District Magistrate. Following the protest by Hindus, the Christian pastor, who was planning to construct the church, relented. He met the village sarpanch and other leaders, and pledged not to build the church, urging the villagers to withdraw their petition.

After receiving assurances that no illegal church would be built in the village, the villagers withdrew the petition. Speaking to OpIndia, a village leader said, “Despite the low Christian population in the village, a church was being constructed on a farm without permission, to which we objected. After the objection, we were assured that no such construction would take place. The petition that was submitted earlier has been withdrawn”.

Leaders of Vahar village reached the Mamlatdar’s office to submit their applications.

Umarpada block official, R.K. Chaudhary, told OpIndia that the matter has now been resolved with the intervention of the Gram Panchayat and therefore, no action was required at the block level. An petition was submitted by villagers to the District Magistrate regarding the construction of the church. However, since the matter has been resolved, a report about the same would be forwarded to the district admininstration.

Chirag Vasava, President of the Umarpada unit of the Dev Birsa Sena, said in a statement, “We continue to work in tribal areas to preserve tribal culture and customs. Recently, the people of Vahar village drew our attention to an illegal church being built in the village and also expressed the fear of future conversion activities there.”

Chirag Vasava, Umarpada, Dev Birsa Army.

He further said, “When the matter came to our attention, we, with the support of the villagers, submitted a petition to the Umarpada block administration. Subsequently, we were assured at the Gram Panchayat meeting that no church would be built. If any such illegal activity continues, Dev Birsa Sena will strongly raise the issue.”

It is worth noting that there have been several similar cases in the past where a church is illegally constructed in a village and then illegal conversion activities are gradually introduced there. Demographic changes have also been observed in many villages in Tapi and Dang. Now, this menance is spreading to other areas as well, but due to the vigilance of local Hindus and the organisation, one village was saved from the threat of conversion.

Who is Rahul Mamkoottathil? Kerala Congress MLA facing multiple rape and sexual harassment cases

Divya Bharti
-
0
Who is Rahul Mamkoottathil? Kerala Congress MLA facing multiple rape and sexual harassment cases

Rahul Mamkoottathil, former Congress MLA from Kerala’s Palakkad constituency, now finds himself at a critical moment. Once seen as a promising young leader with a fast rise in the Indian National Congress, his career has suddenly been overshadowed by sexual harassment and rape cases.

Early life and education

Born on 12th November 1989, in Mundapally, Adoor, in Kerala’s Pathanamthitta district, Rahul comes from a family familiar with politics. He did his early schooling at Thapovan Public School in Adoor and St. John’s School in Pandalam. Later, he earned a Bachelor’s degree in History from Catholicate College, Pathanamthitta.

He further pursued two master’s degrees, one in English from IGNOU and another in History from St. Stephen’s College, Delhi. Currently, he is pursuing his PhD at Mahatma Gandhi University (MGU), Kottayam.

Political Career: Rapid rise through student and youth wings

Rahul’s political journey started in 2006 when he joined the Kerala Students Union (KSU) during his undergraduate studies. He quickly took on leadership roles, becoming KSU president of Adoor constituency in 2007 and president of the Indian Youth Congress’s Peringanadu mandalam committee.

Over the years, he climbed the ranks, serving as district president for Pathanamthitta KSU, KSU state general secretary in 2013, and national secretary of the National Students’ Union of India (NSUI).

In 2023, he was elected as the state president of the Indian Youth Congress in Kerala, succeeding Shafi Parambil. His big political break came in November 2024, when he won the Palakkad by-election with a significant margin. He quickly transitioned into a key leader of the Indian National Congress in the state. Besides politics, Rahul is involved in business too, owning a men’s beauty parlour, partnering in a medical shop and children’s clothing store, and running a Milma agency.

Since August 2025, Rahul’s political journey has been overshadowed by multiple women coming forward with serious complaints of harassment and misconduct.

Complaint by the Congress cultural group leader

A woman leader from Congress’s cultural group Samskara Sahithi spoke publicly about her uncomfortable experiences with Rahul. After returning from a farmers’ protest in Delhi, she said Rahul sent the messages that made her uneasy. She also informed senior Congress MP Shafi Parambil about Rahul’s behaviour when he became Youth Congress president in 2023, but felt her warning was ignored.

Rahul reportedly suggested taking a trip to Delhi together, but when she said she wanted to join the farmers’ agitation again, Rahul made it clear he meant a personal trip with him. She added that other women leaders in the party are aware of his behaviour.

Threats of forced abortion

Another woman accused Rahul of forcing her to have an abortion. A leaked audio clip that went viral showed Rahul threatening her, saying the pregnancy would destroy his life and that he might kill her if she refused. The woman told him she was ready to raise the baby by herself, but Rahul’s reaction was angry and scared. Additionally, there is a rape case against him from a 23-year-old woman who said Rahul exploited her after promising marriage.

Actress Rini George’s accusation

Malayalam actress Rini George publicly shared her story, adding visibility to the controversy. She said Rahul first contacted her on social media about three years ago. His behaviour soon became inappropriate, including an offer to book a five-star hotel room and an invitation to meet there. When she warned him she would report to senior leaders, Rahul dismissed her, saying, “You can go and tell anyone… who cares?” Rini also accused senior Congress leaders of ignoring her complaints, allowing Rahul to stay in important positions. She has not filed a police complaint yet, fearing for her safety.

Congress’s Response

With the situation spiralling beyond control, the Kerala Congress finally took the drastic step of expelling Palakkad MLA Rahul Mamkoottathil, who has been battling multiple allegations of sexual misconduct.

The move came swiftly after the Thiruvananthapuram Principal Sessions Court dismissed his plea for anticipatory bail, stripping the party leadership of any remaining justification to stand by him. The court further declined to grant him protection from arrest, intensifying the pressure.

Announcing the decision, KPCC president Sunny Joseph confirmed that Rahul has been removed from the party’s primary membership with the approval of the AICC. A growing list of complaints and ongoing investigations left the organisation with little choice, he said.

Addressing reporters, senior leaders of the Congress and the UDF maintained that Rahul must now do the “honourable thing” and vacate his seat in the Assembly. Both Sunny Joseph and UDF convener Adoor Prakash made it clear that stepping down as an MLA would be the only responsible next step for the disgraced legislator.

Thiruparankundram Hill row: DMK govt consistently tramples on religious rights of Hindus as secularism takes its last breath at the alter of Muslim appeasement

Rukma Rathore
-
0
Thiruparankundram Hill row: DMK govt consistently tramples on religious rights of Hindus as secularism takes its last breath at the alter of Muslim appeasement

The controversy surrounding the prominent “Thiruparankundram hill” in Tamil Nadu’s Madurai continues unabated, even after the Madras High Court’s decision supporting the Hindus. On 3rd November, a lamp was ignited at the customary Uchipillaiyar temple mandapam against Justice GR Swaminathan’s order to light it at the “Deepathoon,” an ancient stone pillar. Afterward, the action by the temple officials culminated in a brawl between police and Hindu activists.

The ruling Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK), infamous for its animosity towards Hindus decided to challenge the court’s 1st December directive, in the name of concerns over law and order. The matter escalated as petitioner, Rama Ravikumar, attempted to mount the hill while accompanied by Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) troops, on court’s verdict.

However, the state police headed by Madurai Commissioner J Loganathan intervened and halted them after prohibitory orders were issued by Madurai district collector, claiming public safety and the current law-and-order situation.

Members of the Hindu Munnani organisation alongside other activists gathered in front of the temple and demanded that the lamp be lit in the court-mandated location. Some people tried to get past police barricades. It resulted in jostling and a scuffle, in which a police personnel was hurt. A senior Hindu Munnani leader asserted that temple administration had made “no arrangements whatsoever” to comply with the high court’s judgement.

Notably, the temple’s management had contested the court’s earlier decision, arguing that the move would jeopardise communal harmony. However, Judge Swaminathan responded with a stern instruction that the lamp must be lit by 6 pm or contempt proceedings would commence at 6:05 pm.

DMK flouts court’s order, belittles genuine Hindu beliefs in favour of unfounded Muslim assertions

It is concerning, though not unexpected, for the government to behave in this manner considering the actions of the Hindu-hating Dravidian party. The ruling has already been appealed by the state government and the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department. Furthermore, the DMK and its allies even asked the district administration not to follow the court order.

“Hindu outfits are attempting to disrupt public unity by instigating religious conflict in a place where people have lived harmoniously, transcending religious differences. There are also indications that these organisations plan to heavily mobilise their members in Tirupparankundram on Dec 3, the day Karthigai Deepam is traditionally lit, posing a risk to law and order,” the statement alleged.

DMK is unreservedly willing to contravene court orders to display its contempt for Hinduism. The judiciary has sided with the Hindus based on facts and evidence, but the government is intended on continuing the distorted narrative of communal harmony because, in their perversed perspective, tolerance and secularism are only preserved at the expense of Hindus and by encroaching on their religious rights.

These values were never compromised when the Democratic Party of India (SDPI), the political wing of the banned Popular Front of India (PFI), attempted to conduct animal slaughter at the revered location referred to as one of the six abodes of Lord Murugan. The same was not under threat when Indian Union Muslim League (IUML) leader and Ramanathapuram MP K. Nawas Kani (IMUL) along with another MLA and supporters ate non-vegetarian biryani at the sacred hill. Kani even announced that the place belonged to the Waqf Board.

Efforts were also underway to rename it as Sikkandar Hills, after the representative of the Sultans of Delhi who governed Madurai, which led to protests from Hindus. The DMK did not perceive these collectively provocative actions as a danger to harmony and peace only because a significant part of Hinduism was being disparaged which the party implicitly endorses. However, all hell breaks loose when Hindus assertively fight for their rights through legal means.

Likewise, the illegal occupation of the Muslims has persisted on the hill even after the high court pronounced it to be a Hindu temple and the DMK government has allowed these violations. The flag bearers of Dravidianism have invariably sided with fraudulent Muslim claims associated with Thiruparankundram hill and consistently opposed authentic Hindu concerns and legitimate rights.

DMK’s repeated disrespect towards Sanatan Dharma

While the DMK conceals itself behind communal harmony or law and order in the recent issue, it has never hesitated to openly express its disdain for Hinduism and its adherents. Chief Minister MK Stalin’s son and “proud Christian” Udhayanidhi Stalin, who serves as the deputy chief minister, has explicitly called for the  annihilation of Sanatan Dharma, in 2023.

He had remarked, “Just like dengue, mosquitoes, malaria, or coronavirus need to be eradicated, we have to eradicate Sanatana.” The apex court had also lashed out at him and asked, “You abuse your rights under freedom of speech and expression and right to freedom of religion and then come to Supreme Court for protection under Article 32? Do you not know the consequences of what you said,” during a hearing.

DMK MP A Raja went even further to add that Udayanidhi’s derogatory commnets were mild and Sanatan Dharma should have been likened to HIV and leprosy. Hinduphobic actor and DMK-supported Rajya Sabha MP Kamal Haasan who professed to spread “the word of Christ” similarly articulated his wish to “break the chains” of Sanatan Dharma in August of this year.

“Don’t take anything else in your hands, only education. We cannot win without it, because the majority can make you lose. Majority Fools (Moodargal) will make u lose, knowledge alone will seem defeated. That’s why we must hold on to education firmly,” he insisted.

The DMK has not only targeted Hinduism but has also engaged in actions that demean the religion. The Tamil Nadu government in July formally renamed Waddells Road in Chennai’s Kilpauk to Archbishop Ezra Sargunam Road, in recognition of the late anti-Hindu Christian evangelist and Bishop Ezra Sargunam. The party has even opposed Vedic rituals in the name of upholding “secular credentials” as witnessed during the memorial for former Chief Minister J Jayalalithaa.

Conclusion

People who harbour hatred for Hinduism find a place within the DMK, as the entire party epitomises Hindumisia under the guise of their malicious secularism, venerating the vehement critic of the religion and idolising EV Periyar, while showing deference to Abrahamic faiths, particularly Islam and Christianity.

The repeated confrontations at Thiruparankundram hill are simply a continuation of the same. The DMK government is determined to trample on the rights of Hindus, even if it entails defying court orders ot challenging them. Like all its counterparts in India, the party glosses over its abject disdain for Hindus for the sake of “communal harmony and peace,” which is conveniently overlooked while dealing with even the most fabricated claims by members of minority religions.

The Hindu belief system, its holy places and practices, is sacrificed at this twisted altar without a second thought. This is evident in Tamil Nadu, as it is in every part of the country, time and again, with Hindus repeatedly bearing the burden of minority appeasement and vote bank politics perpetrated by these parties.

Nonetheless, DMK or “secular parties” would never have the audacity to behave in this manner towards Muslims or followers of other faiths, which reveals much about their true intentions and motivations.

1...150151152...7,653Page 151 of 7,653