Home Blog Page 1909

Ghaziabad: 23-year-old woman abuses and assaults a 79-year-old man with a stick over feeding stray dogs

A 79-year-old man was harassed and beaten by a 23-year-old woman from a high-rise neighbourhood in Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh after he urged her to feed a stray dog someplace else. The incident occurred at Panchsheel Society in the Crossing Republic. A video of the occurrence that shows Simran striking Roopnarayan Mehra with a stick and verbally assaulting him went viral on social media.

The incident took place on Tuesday, 1st August, at Panchseel Tower in Crossings Republik Township in Ghaziabad, when the man objected to the woman feeding stray dogs in the common area. In the video, the woman can be arguing with the man and hitting him with a stick in the presence of two other men who were trying to stop her but later gave up. A woman who was probable making the video commented that nobody was doing anything to save the man, calling her a ‘pagal aurat’ (mad woman).

The Assistant Commissioner of Police Saloni Agarwal stated that a case has been registered based on a complaint filed by the elderly individual. “The video is from the Panchsheel Society near the Crossing Republic. In the video, a 79-year-old man is being assaulted by a woman. The investigation is ongoing, and appropriate action is being taken. The case pertains to the feeding of street dogs.”

The footage was brought to the police’s notice after which action was taken and further inquiry is underway. Notably, there have been several dog-biting instances in the past couple of months in the Delhi-National Capital Region (NCR) which have resulted in several fatalities and numerous injuries.

A seven-year-old was playing and a pet pitbull pounced on him, biting off his ear and leaving serious wounds on his posterior area in June at Crossings Republik township. Locals demonstrated outside a police station after the shocking episode and demanded action.

An earlier episode took place in May when a woman who resided in Brahmaputra Apartments at Noida’s sector 29 suffered a bite by the pet dog of a retired army major following which a complaint was launched against the former officer.

It is important to mention that reports of stray dog attacks are quite prevalent and come from all around the country. The most common targets of these assaults are women, children and old people.

Nuh violence: People using me, never said nothing happened, just that I didn’t see: Nalhar temple priest whose statement was misused by leftists to spread propaganda

Islamists viciously attacked hundreds of Hindu pilgrims on July 31 during the Jalabhishek Yatra on Shravan Somvar in Haryana’s Nuh district. Despite knowing that more than 80 per cent of those who perished in the Nuh violence are Hindus, the typical coterie of leftist liberals and Islamists, as well as their apologists, have been constantly at work to whitewash the attack and portray Muslims as the victims.

Some of these esteemed members of the anti-Hindu brigade went as far as using a half-unfinished statement of the priest of the Nalhar Temple, where thousands of Hindus took refuge to save themselves from the planned Islamist onslaught, to propagate their narrative.

They shared a 20-second clip from an interview wherein Deepak Sharma, the Nalhar Mahadev temple priest, could be heard saying that nothing happened in and around the temple. On the basis of this statement of the priest, the leftist media started concocting a web of lies, insinuating that the rioters did not attack the temple nor were the Hindus held hostage.

Notably, after the Islamist violence took place in Nuh, the leftist media portal Lallantop interviewed Deepak Sharma. In the video, which has garnered around 90 thousand views, the priest can be heard saying, “Nothing happened inside the temple. Whatever happened, it was about 1 to 1.5 km away from the temple.”

As soon as the interview was released, several members of the leftist brigade descended on Twitter and began sharing a 21-second clip from this interview to whitewash the Islamist attack.

It was shared by Twitter user @AG_knocks on August 1, 2023.

Alt News’ co-founder Mohammed Zubair, who dog-whistled Islamists against Nupur Sharma by sharing an incomplete video of her comments on Prophet Muhammad, also retweeted the 21-second clip from a Lallantop report.

The leftist news portal, The Wire grabbed the opportunity with both hands. It published a report on August 1, 2023, where it used Deepak Sharma’s statement to insinuate that the Haryana Home Minister Anil Vij lied when he asserted that around 3,000 to 4,000 people were held hostage by Muslim rioters at the Nalhar Mahadev temple.

Report published by The Wire on August 1, 2023

Even while the leftist media and Islamist apologists continue to use the Nuh violence to portray Muslims as the victims instead of the Hindus, which is in conformity with their usual trope to shield Muslims and paint Hindus as the aggressors, the dilemma here is: Can a 21-second clip chosen from in-between an interview explain the priest’s complete argument? Did the left-wing media purposely cherrypick this particular segment of the interview because it suited their narrative so effectively?

To answer these questions and know the truth behind the 21-second propaganda video, OpIndia spoke to Deepak Sharma, the Nalhar Mahadev temple priest. In the conversation which lasted for about 30 minutes, Deepak Sharma, who is originally a native of Punjab, told us that he had been looking after the Nalhar Mahadev Temple in Nuh for the last two and a half years.

When we asked him about the clip that has been going viral, he said that statement is being misconstrued and misrepresented and that he in no way denied the occurrence of the violence. Explaining what he had intended to convey, Deepak said that he meant that he did not witness the incident with his own eyes as he did not come out during the attack as the administration asked them not to. He added to have listened to loud noises from inside and sensed palpable fear among the Hindu devotees.

Deepak Sharma further said that everything was normal until 2 o’clock in the afternoon, but suddenly after that, everything became chaotic.

The Nalhar temple priest further told us that there were CCTV cameras placed in the entire temple premises, however, only the CCTV placed in the sanctum sanctorum area of the temple in working. In other areas, cameras and cables malfunctioned due to bad weather.

He also voiced concern that some people might be exploiting his name for political purposes. Deepak Sharma added that he feels someone is trying to trap him.

When we questioned him about the viral footage of the injured in the temple, Deepak Sharma said that it was not possible for him to examine every area of the temple. He added that since the internet has been suspended in Nuh it was not possible for him to acquire the viral videos of the violence that took place inside the temple otherwise he could have examined those and clarified.

Sharma acknowledged hearing loud sounds of bullets being fired from the hills surrounding the temple on three sides.

The conversation OpIndia had with Deepak Sharma made it evidently clear that the left-liberal media used a half-unfinished statement of the priest, who did not come outside the temple at all when the violence took place, to propagate their narrative.

Moreover, a 21-second video cannot show the extent of the anti-Hindu riots that were unleashed by the radical Muslim mob in Nuh, Haryana.

Nevertheless, in the video where the Lallantop reporter shared the extent of the damage, he categorically said the attack appeared pre-planned. The likes of Zubair and The Wire, however, appeared to have missed the point completely in a hurry to save the Islamic mob that pelted stones and fired on Hindu devotees.

Meanwhile, the situation is currently returning to normal as paramilitary ITBP personnel are stationed in and around the Nalhar temple in Nuh, Haryana.

Rajasthan police raids house of sacked Congress minister Rajendra Gudha after ‘Red Diary’ controversy erupted

A day after former Rajasthan Minister Rajendra Gudha held a press conference and shared some specifics from the ‘Red Diary’ that allegedly contains details of CM Ashok Gehlot’s illegal financial transactions, Rajasthan police arrived at the sacked minister’s house to investigate an alleged POCSO Act case against him. However, Rajendra Gudha was not present at his residence at that time.

Although the police said that they had come to question Rajendra Gudha in connection with the said POCSO case, they did not share any specifics of the case against the sacked minister. 

The timing of police action raises questions as Rajendra Gudha, a former minister in Ashok Gehlot’s cabinet has been vocal against his own government on various issues like the safety of women and corruption. 

Rajendra Gudha held a press conference on Wednesday, August 2nd, where he read three pages from a red diary and disclosed details to the media about CM Gehlot, his and his accomplices’ alleged corrupt dealings. He said that these pages make evident the financial transactions and corruption-related information of the Rajasthan Cricket Association (RCA). These allegedly authentic papers contain an alleged conversation between the Chairman of the Tourism Development Corporation Dharmendra Rathore and OSD Saubhag Singh of Chief Minister Ashok Gehlot. 

The “Red Diary” controversy started on July 24 when Gudha, an MLA from the Udaipurwati assembly constituency, waved it in the house following his ouster as a state minister for criticising the state government’s failures in protecting women. He carried the diary and approached the assembly speaker. He was expelled from the House for the duration of the entire session after the incident. 

Speaking in the assembly, Gudha had said that it should be accepted that the state government “failed” in women’s safety.

“It is true and should be accepted that we have failed in women’s safety. Instead of Manipur, we should look within ourselves why atrocities on women have increased in Rajasthan,” Gudha said. 

US: Indian-American engineer files lawsuit for discrimination after getting fired for speaking in Hindi during personal call with dying relative

An Indian-American engineer working with a missile defence contractor in the United States was fired from his long-time job after one of his colleagues heard him speaking in Hindi. Anil Varshney was talking to his dying relative in India over a video call when a colleague heard him using his native language.

Varshney was working as a senior systems engineer with Huntsville missile defence contractor Parsons Corporation located in Alabama. He has since filed a federal lawsuit and charged that systemic discrimination contributed to his termination from his position in October of last year.

Anil Varshney received a video call from his elderly brother-in-law KC Gupta, who was close to death, on 26 September 2022 and wanted to bid him farewell. Varshney moved into an open cubicle and took the call aware of the bitter reality that he might never speak to the latter again. In accordance with the lawsuit, he made sure there were no classified items or work-related information from his employer or the Missile Defence Agency (MDA) close by before taking the call.

The two only had a two-minute conversation in Hindi on a video chat, per the petition, which was filed in June in the northern district of Alabama. He, however, was interrupted by another employee who questioned him about the conversation and instantly ended it after learning from him that video calls were not allowed. Unfortunately, this turned out to be his last conversation with his relative before he passed away.

The lawsuit stated that Anil Varshney “scared” his colleague because he couldn’t understand what the former was communicating. The coworker then “falsely and intentionally” reported the incident to the police, accusing the man of breaching security by either disclosing confidential information during the call or accepting the call while in the presence of confidential information or taking the call during a private meeting.

It affirmed, “Despite there being no policy prohibiting the call, and without any investigation, the defendants claimed Anil Varshney committed a serious security violation and fired him. Worse, they blackballed him from future (Missile Defence Agency) work, effectively ending his career and life of service to MDA and the US government.”

It further added, “There was no confidential or classified information anywhere near the call. The cubicle where Mr Varshney accepted the video call was completely empty with no office material or wall hangings in the cubicle, and there was no confidential information being exchanged nearby.”

Notably, Varshney was earlier honoured as the “Contractor of the Year” in systems engineering for his efforts to save USD 5 million on the ground-based missile defence programme. He provided engineering support for the creation of layered, integrated missile defence systems that protect partner troops of the United States and its allies against ballistic missile threats.

The lawsuit asserted that he wanted his privileges restored, his reinstatement to a position “comparable to his former position” and the cancellation (or removal) of any disciplinary records in his file. He demanded “front pay including benefits” if he is not reappointed to his previous position level. In addition, he sought attorneys’ expenses, punitive and liquidated damages and compensatory losses for “mental anguish and emotional distress.”

The asinine ‘Monu Monu’ song by Ravish Kumar just gave a violent call to action: Here is that one sentence and why it is deeply problematic

The violence against Hindus at Nuh, Mewat, has become a flashpoint for those who sympathise with the Islamists, in the media and otherwise. There has been a concerted attempt to whitewash the violence unleashed by Muslim mobs on the 31st of July against the Jalabhishek Shobha Yatra organised by VHP, in which thousands of Hindus participated. One of the most prominent tropes to shield the Islamists and their Leftists ideological is trying to paint a target on the back of Monu Manesar and blame him for the violence when he was not even present at the Yatra.

Right after violence broke out in Nuh with Hindus coming under attack, there was fake news being spread by Islamists that the violence broke out because Monu Manesar was present at the Shobha Yatra. OpIndia did a detailed fact check and found that many Islamists and Leftists were using an old video of Manesar to falsely claim that he was present at the Shobha Yatra.

Besides the dangerous fake news, it is also pertinent to note that even if Manesar was present, using that to legitimise mass-scale violence against thousands of Hindus only proves how committed the Islamists are to dehumanising Hindus. Unless allegations are proven against Manesar and he is arrested by the police, it is pertinent to note that there is no arrest warrant against him or a red corner notice. As such, he is as free to release a video or attend a rally if he so chooses. If the police believe he is guilty and has evidence to tie him to a crime, they should be arresting him. However, for the media to use a video by him to justify the violence by thousands of Islamists, armed to the teeth, against thousands of Hindu devotees only proves that Monu Manesar is merely an excuse. The Muslim mob unleashed violence in a pre-planned manner (as proven by media reports, an OpIndia investigation and even police investigation details that are now emerging). The rioters had weapons, swords, trucks of stones, knives, acid bottles, petrol bombs and more in their possession. They even took anywhere between 2000-2500 Hindus hostage in a Temple and murdered at least 5 Hindus. All of this is being justified because of a video by Monu Manesar, a man who was not even there at the Shobha Yatra and whose alleged role in the murder of two Muslim men has not even been proven yet.

Essentially, the ecosystem has claimed that Monu Manesar was involved in the murder of two Muslim men. The police are “yet to pinpoint his role” in the murders, mentioned in several reports, even reports from Leftist portals. With his role unproven, the Leftists are basically saying that simply because there are allegations against him, he has no right to say what he wants or go where he wants, to a point where if he does, then a Muslim mob can legitimately unleash violence against thousands of Hindus – even kill a few and desecrate temples.

This trope was furthered by several individuals in the media. Their sleigh of hand was obvious because they constantly harped about the violence in Gurgaon, however, failed to mention that the violence started when a Muslim mob attacked thousands of Hindu devotees for hours, pelted stones, burnt cars, held Hindus hostage, molested women, murdered some devotees, shot at them, stabbed them, slit their throat and ram rampage.

One of the proponents who furthered this dishonest trope was Ravish Kumar – a veteran propagandist of television media turned newbie propagandist YouTuber. In his inimitably annoying and dishonest style, Ravish Kumar released a video on his YouTube channel where he attempted to shame Hindus into not essentially “doing something” about Monu Manesar. In a strange video, he claimed that Gurgaon was an affluent neighbourhood and those who live in high-rise buildings are closing their eyes to the dangers of people like Monu Manesar. Further, he released a song. Yes. A song. Called “Monu Monu”.

(These visuals can be disturbing. Viewer discretion is advised).

While this tone-deaf attempt to shame Hindus after a Muslim mob went on a murderous rampage against thousands of devotees and desecrated temples was hilarious, and was summarily mocked on social media, there was one line in this pool of asininity that deserves attention.

After the “They are Monu, You are Monu” nonsense, Ravish Kumar says, “Find out Monu, Flush out Monu”. The phrase “Flush out” essentially means to ensure someone is drawn out of their hiding place, often, in common parlance, used during hunting when animals need to be flushed out to be killed.

Interestingly, The phrase ‘flush out’ is commonly used in discussions of police investigations and wartime strategies. The metaphor originates from bird hunting, where it is common to use a hunting dog to draw out birds from hiding, in order to hunt them and kill them.

It is pertinent to note that Ravish Kumar used this phrase after blaming Monu Manesar for the violence that had gripped certain parts of Haryana. The gist of what he said whitewashes the crimes of the Muslim mob, essentially holding Monu Manesar responsible for the violence unleashed by the Muslim mob. After that, when he uses the term “flush out Monu”, it would directly mean that the rioters should continue doing what they are doing because that is how Monu Manesar would be “drawn out in the open” for a hunt.

The use of the sentence, “Find out Monu, Flush out Monu” could, therefore, essentially mean that he is telling the rioters to either “find him” or ensure that they “draw him out” – both would essentially lead to him being hunted down.

This would qualify as a direct call to action by Ravish Kumar. Pertinently, this is not the first time that he has blamed Hindus for violence committed by Islamists. Ravish was one of the frontrunners in calling the Delhi anti-Hindu riots an ‘anti-Muslim pogrom”. He had convinced himself of his lies to such an extent, that shooter Shahrukh Pathan, who was captured in a photograph drawing a weapon at a police constable, was named “Anurag” by Ravish on national television.

In his show ‘Prime Time’ on 26th February 2020, Ravish Kumar resorted to spreading half-truths and full lies about the horrifying spate of violence that had engulfed the national capital. In pursuance of what appeared as his agenda to tarnish Hindus and portray them as the aggressors of the riots, Kumar identified Mohammad Shahrukh alias Shahrukh Pathan, who fired at Delhi Police personnel on February 24, as one ‘Anurag Mishra’.

For the 26th February 2020 show, Ravish claimed that police had not yet arrested him while he was arrested on 25th February itself, good 24 hours before his show premiered. “Police ki haalat yeh hai ki abhi tak giraftar nahin hua hai. Police saaf kehti hai ki Shahrukh hai magar aap social media mein dekhiye Anurag Mishra bataya jaa raha hai. (Situation of the Police is such that they have not yet arrested him. Police say his name is Shahrukh but if you see him on social media, he is called Anurag Mishra),” he spoke in his characteristic drawl during the show. Naturally, it was quite a revelation since no one had yet referred to the shooter as “Anurag Mishra” till then.

He then asked Delhi Police to speak out on his identity again. He then played an undated speech of his reporter who appeared to be asking Delhi Police personnel about Shahrukh’s arrest. Slyly, Ravish Kumar then played the videos of BJP leaders Anurag Thakur, Kapil Mishra and Pravesh Verma addressing rallies ahead of the Delhi elections to cast aspersions that their speeches were responsible for stoking riots a month later.

Phrases, words and sentences used often have a socio-political context. For example, “Final solution” is an innocuous phrase, however, it will, forever, be attached to Hitler and his genocide of innocent Jews. Similarly, after whitewashing the crimes of Islamists and blaming Hindus for their own persecution, when Ravish Kumar wants Islamists to “Find out, Flush out” Monu Manesar, it is not a far-fetched deduction that he is asking for Monu Manesar to be hunted. If Monu Manesar is guilty, he should be dealt with in accordance with the law, but those who sit in judgement of the morality of others calling for violence against a man simply because he fights to save cows is a travesty that deserves to be called out.

NGT forms joint committee to probe alleged illegal mining by Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh in Uttar Pradesh’s Gonda

0

The National Green Tribunal (NGT) has formed a Joint Committee to verify the factual position and take appropriate remedial action on allegations of illegal mining by BJP MP Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh in Uttar Pradesh’s Gonda district.

The NGT formed a panel to investigate allegations made by Raja Ram Singh who claimed that Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh, a Member of Parliament from Kesar Ganj, was involved in illegal mining in villages such as Majharath, Jaitpur, and Nawabganj in Tehsil Tarbganj and District Gonda. Singh also alleged that over 700 overloaded trucks were used every day for the illegal transportation, storage, and sale of about 20 lakh cubic meters of minor minerals. Additionally, he claimed that the Patpar Ganj Bridge and Road were damaged by these overloaded trucks. The bench of Justice Arun Kumar Tyagi (Judicial member) and Dr A Senthil Vel (Expert Member) on August 2, said that “Prima facie, the averments made in the application raise questions relating to the environment arising out of the implementation of the enactments specified in Schedule I to the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010.”

The bench said that “in view of the averments made in the application, we consider it appropriate that a Joint Committee be constituted to verify the factual position and take appropriate remedial action.”

The NGT seeks a factual and Action taken Report to be submitted within two months, while fixing the matter for the next hearing on November 7, 2023.

“Accordingly, we constitute a Joint Committee comprising the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC), Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), National Mission for Clean Ganga (NMCG), Uttar Pradesh Pollution Control Board (UPPCB) and District Magistrate, Gonda and direct the same to meet within one week,” NGT bench said.

The NGT also directed the Committee to visit the site, look into the grievances of the applicant, associate with the applicant and a representative of the concerned project proponent, verify the factual position, and take appropriate remedial action by following the due course of law and giving the project proponent the opportunity to be heard.

“The Committee may particularly clarify compliance with Sustainable Sand Mining Management Guidelines, 2016 and Enforcement and Monitoring Guidelines for Sand Mining, 2020, including remediation/rehabilitation of mined areas and damage caused to the river Saryu,” said the NGT bench.

(This news report is published from a syndicated feed. Except for the headline, the content has not been written or edited by OpIndia staff)

Muslim girls protest outside Mumbai college against dress code banning burqa and hijab, college allows them on campus with conditions

0

On Wednesday, August 2, protests were staged outside the NG Acharya & DK Marathe College in Mumbai’s Chembur against the college’s uniform policy. The protests started after security guards outside the college gates barred entry to Burqa-clad girls as they failed to comply with the college’s rules pertaining to the uniform. The parents of such girls were also present during the protests. Reportedly, the college later stepped back and allowed the girls to enter the college.

After police officers arrived and negotiated with the parents and college officials, the situation was placated. By evening, the college issued a statement outlining some specific guidelines to be followed concerning the dress code.

The photos and videos of the incident went viral on social media. A large gathering of Burqa-clad students and their parents gathered outside the campus, as seen in one of the videos from the protest site.

While speaking about the incident, College Principal Vidya Gauri Lele stated that the college had recently implemented a dress code this year and that the rules had been communicated to the parents well in advance.

“We held a meeting with parents on the 1st of May to go through this new dress code policy. Everything, including the prohibition on the burqa, the hijab, scarves, and stickers, had been announced. Everyone had agreed to the dress code at the time. However, they are currently protesting,” she stated, adding that if any girl is opposed to the dress code she is free to leave the college.

The Muslim girl students of the college claimed that they feel uncomfortable in leaving the house without donning a burqa or hijab because it is an obligation for them. They reportedly asked for permission to put on scarves.

In a statement later that evening, the college authorities said that in consideration of the safety and dignity of the protesting girl students, they will be permitted to enter the college wearing a burqa, hijab, or scarf. However, the principal specified that they will be required to remove it in the washroom before entering the classroom and may wear it again while leaving the classroom in the evening.

OpIndia talks to the principal

OpIndia talked to Principal Vidya Gauri Lele on the issue, who reiterated that the uniform code was communicated to the students well in advance, which included ban on various items like hijab, fancy bags, stickers, caps etc. She said, “We had implemented uniforms for students of 11th and 12th standard which fall under school education. The parents were informed about this in a meeting which was held in this regard on 1st May 2023. They were informed that fancy bags, stickers, hijab, topi is not to be worn and only the uniform prescribed by the school must be worn. Because it is a school, it is not a college. Some junior colleges in Maharashtra are run alongside senior colleges. But junior colleges still come under school education. In all other states, junior colleges are associated with schools. In Maharashtra, the provision is for both ways.”

When asked specifically whether the students can wear a burqa, the principal confirmed that it is not allowed. “They cannot wear burqas inside the college because we have already implemented a uniform. After they enter the college, they can go to the washroom and take off all that is not mentioned as part of uniform, wear their uniform and then they can go around anywhere in the college,” she said.

Responding to the query on the students being asked to remove the burqa outside the college gate, Vidya Gauri Lele said, “Yes, earlier it was said to remove their burqas before entering the college. And after that, we altered it a little (by allowing them to change inside the college). We do not have enough staff to keep a check if students change into the prescribed uniform after entering college or not. So who will monitor all this? This is a simple matter related to uniform and nothing more. The uniform has been introduced so that no one is able to discriminate on the basis of caste, religion, and class. So that all students have an equal standing.”

She added, “And the uniform for girls has been prescribed by making their modesty a priority. They have been prescribed a salwar kameez and jacket. We have fixed a vendor who supplies these and all students have bought it. Only a few are left.”

It is worth recalling that a similar ban on hijab in colleges in Karnataka sparked a controversy last year that went all the way to the Supreme Court and triggered protests across the country.

Karnataka Hijab Controversy

The hijab controversy in Karnataka gained traction in the first week of January last year when eight Muslim girls were denied entry to classes at a Udupi college as they wore hijabs. The college authorities had informed that the hijab was not a part of the uniform dress code mandated for the students.

The Muslim girls, who were adamant about wearing hijab, subsequently petitioned the High Court to be allowed to attend classes while wearing hijab. They claimed that donning the Hijab was both a “integral practice of Islam” and their “fundamental right” guaranteed by Articles 14 and 25 of the Indian Constitution.

As Hindu students in Karnataka protested against Muslim girls continuing to wear the hijab to college by donning saffron scarves around their necks, the dispute intensified. In Udupi, Shivamogga, Bagalkote, and other areas, tensions persisted at some educational institutions as reports of stone-pelting and violence came in from different regions of the state.

According to prior reports, after meeting the Campus Front of India (CFI), the student arm of the now-banned Islamist group Popular Front of India (PFI), in October 2021, the students started wearing the hijab to colleges and schools. The students admitted that they were in contact with the CFI.

Haryana: Violence fueled by social media in Nuh, Govt starts crackdown on accounts spreading disinformation

Central authorities and ministries have launched a massive crackdown on around 100 social media handles that have been exceedingly engaged and continuously participating in circulating misinformation about the Nuh violence. According to the police, they are utilising the disturbance in Haryana to forward their nefarious objective, which could weaken the law and order situation or further destabilise the peace in the state.

The accounts are dispersed over a number of social media platforms, including Twitter (now X). The center has already commenced the process of blocking them. News 18 quoted a senior government official saying that after a thorough review, some of them were blocked and others will soon face the repercussions.

Close to 100 of these accounts will be reportedly disabled after it has been determined that they are inciting violence and stirring public sentiment using audio-visual mediums. Analysis has revealed that their content has the capacity to provoke communities or groups and to promote violence.

The sources revealed that a thorough investigation by a central intelligence agency has revealed that they are provocative, distribute propaganda and stoked public emotions. Some of them which broadcast videos to a particular community on social media platforms were also identified by another department of the center. It will soon receive a list of the former so that restricting them can be initiated.

New incidents were reported on 2 August from Manesar and West Gurugram, as tensions in some areas of Haryana persisted. The city was mainly calm despite one incident in the western part of the city and two in Manesar.

The state government issued an order to halt internet access in the districts of Nuh, Faridabad, Sohna, Pataudi, Manesar, and Palwal till 5 August after evaluating the situation in a few regions. The district administration in Gurugram permitted schools to open in the Sohna subdivision.

As section 144 remains in place and the situation remains tense, the authorities are alert against any social media rumors that can spark fresh tension.

The investigation per the sources disclosed that a group had encouraged people to assemble at a particular location and time. Some handles were used to mobilize the crowd and instigate violence against a targeted community. The details and intelligence obtained by a central agency served as the basis for the report’s preparation.

Notably, a number of Muslim users carried out propaganda posts and drove their followers to attack the Jalabhishek Yatra organized by Hindus. Calls for violence against Hindus were made 2 days prior to the incident on July 31. They alleged that Gau Rakshak Monu Manesar was scheduled to be a part of the religious processions. An old video of him was also published, along with a bogus assertion that it was recent and a claim that he was the cause of the violence against Hindus.

Gyanvapi case: Plea filed in Allahabad High Court seeking preservation of the historical evidence at the disputed structure

The Vishwa Vedic Sanathan Sangh has filed a plea in the Allahabad HC seeking the preservation of the Gyanvapi complex. The applicants have claimed that members of the Anjuman Intezamia Masajid Committee are “tampering with the historical evidence present there that is related to the Hindu religion and were found during the court-ordered survey” in May 2022.

“A PIL has been filed in Allahabad HC demanding that plot number 9130 in the Gyanvapi campus should be sealed…The demand has been put forth so that the Hindu symbols like Trishul, Lotus & Swastik are not damaged”, said Advocate Saurabh Tiwari. The PIL has also sought that the premises of the Gyanvapi complex be sealed.

The PIL read, “Till the decision of the Varanasi court in the Shringar Gauri case, the entry of non-Hindus in the campus should be banned and Hindu symbols found in the Gyanvapi campus should be ordered to be preserved. Such arrangements should be made that the work of the ASI survey in Gyanvapi is not affected.”

The application further stated, “On July 24, when the ASI survey was done between 7 am and 12 noon, the mosque committee had locked the gate of the so-called mosque and refused to give the key to the ASI, which makes it clear that the committee is attempting to destroy evidence related to the Hindu religion”.

The application could reportedly be taken up on August 4, Friday, according to Advocate Rajesh Mishra, the special counsel in the Gyanvapi cases in the Varanasi district court.

Three days ago, Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath had said in an interview with ANI that clear Hindu symbols can be seen on the walls of the (disputed) Gyanvapi structure.

He said, “There are idols of Hindu gods and goddesses carved on the walls. There are Trishuls and other Hindu symbols all over it. Anybody who has eyesight can see that. There is a Jyotirling. The walls of the structure are screaming the truth. I think now is the time the Muslim society should come together and acknowledge that historical mistakes have been made, and make amends.”

’35-40 devotees were held hostage by rioters at Ram Mandir in Nuh’: Horrifying details from FIR on complaint of Duty Magistrate Adib Hussain

On 31st July, a Muslim mob in Nuh of Mewat, Haryana, attacked thousands of Hindu devotees attending the Jalabhishek Yatra on Shravan Somvar. OpIndia accessed several FIRs registered in the case. One of the FIR that was registered on the complaint of Adib Hussain who is a Sub Divisional Engineer PHES of Sub Division Tauru, it was revealed that 400-500 Islamist rioters held 35-40 devotees hostage at Ram Mandir in Ward No 9, Nuh. Hussain was stationed at Nuh Police Station as Duty Magistrate for Mewat Religious Jalabhishek Yatra.

Details of the FIR

FIR was registered on the complaint of Duty Magistrate Adib Hussain under Sections 148, 149, 186, 332, 307, 342 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25 of the Arms Act against 700-800 unknown persons.

In his complaint, Hussain said he was with managing officer Ombir Singh when 700-800 rioters from the Muslim community started pelting stones and opened fire with illegal weapons on devotees and police personnel. The rioters burnt down the government and private vehicles.

Source: Haryana Police

At the time of the attack, Hussain and Singh were at Nuh bus stand. They were informed that hundreds of rioters attacked 35-40 devotees and held them hostage at Ram Mandir in Ward No 9. Hussain mentioned that the rioters were not letting the devotees leave the Ram Mandir premises. When they reached the location, 400-500 rioters with batons, sticks, stones and illegal weapons started shooting at them to kill them.

Hussain instructed Singh and other police officials to use appropriate force to disperse the rioters, which they succeeded. They rescued the devotees who were held hostage in the temple.

OpIndia’s complete coverage of the Mewat Shobha Yatra Attack can be checked here.