Home Blog Page 3123

Himanta Biswa Sarma to file criminal defamation case against Manish Sisodia over scam allegations, Sisodia brings out a ‘cancelled PO’ as his proof

Assam’s Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma has hit back at Delhi’s deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia for leveling corruption allegations in the purchase of personal protective equipment (PPE) kits during the Covid pandemic period. CM Sarma asked Manish Sisodia to stop sermonizing and told him to get ready for a criminal defamation case on the matter.

On 1st June 2022, the leftist media portal The Wire published a report alleging that a firm owned by Riniki Bhuyan Sarma was given an order to supply PPE kits and other Covid-19 essentials without following due procedure. The report claimed that when Himanta Biswa Sarma was the health minister in the previous Sarbananda Sonowal govt in Assam, a firm owned by his wife Riniki Bhuyan Sarma was granted an urgent work order to supply 5,000 PPE kits, despite having no history of supplying or producing medical equipment and safety gears.

Following this, Riniki Bhuyan Sarma refuted the allegations made in the report by The Wire and said she didn’t take even a penny for the supply of the PPE kits. She said that she had donated the PPE kits to the National Health Mission under CSR, and no payment was taken for the same.

On 4th June 2022, Delhi’s deputy chief minister Manish Sisodia held a press conference and accused Himanta Biswa Sarma of corruption. He alleged that Himanta Biswa Sarma gave contracts of government purchase to the companies owned by his wife and close associates. Sisodia quoted the report published by The Wire and repeated the claims made in the report.

Responding to these allegations, Himanta Biswa Sarma posted on his Twitter handle, “At a time when the entire country was facing the worst pandemic in over 100 years, Assam hardly had any PPE Kits My wife took the courage of coming forward and donating around 1500 free of cost to the govt to save lives She didn’t take a single penny.” He also attached a letter of appreciation written by the Director of National Health Mission, Assam to the office bearers of the company owned by Riniki Bhuyan Sarma for providing the necessary PPE kits free of cost. The letter is dated 27th March 2020.

Himanta Biswa Sarma further tweeted, “While you Mr. Manish Sisodia at that point of time showed a completely different side. You refused my multiple calls to help Assamese people stuck in Delhi. I can never forget one instance when I had to wait 7 days just to get an Assamese covid victim’s body from Delhi’s mortuary.”

Challenging Manish Sisodia to prove his claims in the court of law, Himanta Biswa Sarma wrote in a further tweet, “Stop sermonising and I will see you soon in Guwahati as you will face criminal defamation.”

Responding to Himanta Biswa Sarma, AAP leader Manish Sisodia tweeted a photograph of a ‘canceled purchase order’ dated 18th March 2020. In his tweet, Manish Sisodia wrote, “Hon’ble chief minister Himanta Biswa Sarma Ji, Here’s your wife’s contract to buy 5000 kits in the name of JCB Industries at 990/- per kit. Tell me, is this paper false? Is it not corruption to give a purchase order without any tender to your wife’s company when you were the Health Minister?”

Manisha Sisodia seems to have ignored that the purchase order he flagged in his tweet clearly mentions that it is a cancelled PO. According to a report by The Free Press Journal, Assam government’s spokesperson Piyush Hazarika said that there was no scam in the supply of PPE kits and no member of the chief minister’s family were involved in the supply of any material related to the COVID pandemic.

NDTV journalist writes an entire thread about the second arrest in the Hyderabad rape case, has trouble stating that the accused is a son of a Waqf Board official

Hyderabad police on Saturday arrested two minors including the son of a senior Waqf board official in connection with the gang rape of a 17-year-old girl at Jubilee Hills. Uma Sudhir, a ‘journalist’ working for NDTV, took to Twitter to share the aforementioned development in the case. Notably, the ‘journalist’ has been posting many important updates on the case since June 3 on her Twitter handle. In her latest Tweet, she informed how the Hyderabad police made the second arrest in the case but conveniently skipped mentioning that the accused was a son of a Waqf Board leader.

The NDTV journalist Tweeted, “Second arrest in #HyderabadGangrape case: one among three minors out of five accused, has been taken into custody by #Hyderabadpolice; this happens to be son of #TRS leader recently elected as head of important community body @ndtv@ndtvindia.”

In her carefully worded Tweet, the NDTV journalist wrote that the arrested juvenile happens to be the son of a TRS leader, recently elected as “head of important community body”. She had purposely avoided mentioning the name of ‘Waqf Board’ and instead called it an ‘important community body’.

Notably, after the gang-rape case came to light, it was reported in the media that the sons of two VIPs were involved in the crime. One was reported to be the son of an AIMIM MLA, and the other was reported to be the son of a TRS leader, who also happens to be Waqf Board Chairman. Many media houses, several left-leaning ones too, reported the same. Yesterday the police said that the AIMIM MLA’s son was not present at the time of the crime, but the son of another VIP was involved.

The report published by TNIE
The report published by News 18

However, what is surprising is that despite the information being out in the open, the NDTV ‘journalist’ refrained from mentioning the name of the Islamic body.

What’s more intriguing is that Uma Sudhir did not even hesitate once to state that the accused was the son of a TRS leader, but she had trouble indicating that this TRS leader is also the chairman of the ‘Waqf Board.’ It was most likely her frenzied attempt to give the crime a ‘secular’ spin. She, like her left-liberal secular cohorts, undoubtedly did not want to portray a Muslim as the perpetrator. This cabal of left-liberals, in their unconditional affection for Islamists, has been whitewashing crimes committed by Islamists for years, and this appears to be one of those classic cases.

NDTV ‘journalist’ dismisses communal angle in Hindu man’s murder case

Here it becomes pertinent to mention that Uma Sudhir had previously also tried to dismiss the communal angle in a case where Muslims were the perpetrator. In May 2022, a day after a Hindu man was brutally murdered on the streets of Hyderabad for marrying a Muslim woman by the woman’s family, Uma Sudhir, executive editor at controversial news network NDTV, attempted to gloss over the religious overtones of the murder. She had then urged people to not give a communal or caste colour to the incident, when the Hindu man 25-year-old Nagaraju was stabbed to death by two Muslim men for marrying a Muslim woman.

She is the same NDTV ‘journalist’ who had in 2018, attempted to gaslight victims of sexual harassment, presumably to protect her husband, who was accused of sexually assaulting his colleague.

The Hyderabad rape case

Meanwhile, out of the five persons identified as accused in the heinous crime, police had already arrested Saduddin Malik on Friday. Two juvenile culprits were held today, including the TRS leader and Waqf Board Chairman’s son. Another adult accused Umran Khan and another minor boy who is involved in the offence are still absconding.

Deputy Commissioner of Police (West Zone) Joel Davis conducted a press conference yesterday and said that the victim minor girl could identify only one of the accused, and the rest were identified with the help of CCTV footage. He said that the police have identified 5 culprits as per CCTV footage and as per the statement of the victim. He informed that out of the 5 culprits that were identified, three are minors.

The minor girl was gang-raped in Telangana’s capital Hyderabad on 28th May 2022. The Mercedes car in which the crime took place belongs to the TRS leader. The victim girl had gone to attend a party at the Amnesia and Insomnia Pub in Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad. Reportedly, the culprits took her out of the party in the Mercedes car and then gang raped her.

In his complaint to the jubilee hills police station on June 1, the girl’s father said that some boys in a Mercedes car brought his daughter out of the pub and took her in the car, and then gang-raped her.

According to the father’s complaint, his daughter had gone to a party in the pub on the afternoon of May 28. At around 5.30 pm, some boys took her away in a red Mercedes numbered TS09 FL6460. Along with this, some boys came there in an Innova with a temporary registration number.

The father has also stated in his complaint that these boys also abused and assaulted his daughter, due to which she suffered minor injuries on her neck. At that time, the girl was in deep shock and was unable to tell the exact details of what happened.

Based on the complaint of the minor girl’s father, a case has been registered against the accused under Sections 354, Section 376, and Section 323 of the IPC and Sections 9 and 10 of the POCSO Act.

Tamil Nadu: AIADMK, BJP slam Dravidar Kazhagam for raising derogatory slogans against Hindu deities, DK workers booked

On Saturday, the All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK) and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) slammed the Dravidar Kazhagam (DK) for raising derogatory slogans against the Hindu deities during its rally that was organized on May 29 in Madurai.

According to the reports, a few Periyar-ist organizations like Dravidar Viduthalai Kazhagam (DVK), Thol Thirumavalavan’s Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi (VCK), Popular Front of India, and some other associated organizations had organized a rally in Madurai, Tamil Nadu on Sunday. The rally was popularised as ‘Sensattai Rally’. The participants in the rally abused the Hindu deities and raised slogans specifically against worshiping Lord Krishna, Goddess Amman, and Lord Ayyappan.

“That Maari (Goddess Amman) who asks for a sacrifice of goats and pigs a God? Is Kannan (Lord Krishna), who raped woman, a God? Will a child be born if a man and man have sex? Is calling Ayyappan a God rational?”, the participants could be heard shouting.

During the rally, the participants also questioned the Hindu devotees for worshiping Hindu deities “Hey you devotee who comes dancing taking piercings in the body, why don’t come piercing it through your chest once? Hey you devotee who comes dancing taking piercings in the jaw, why don’t you try piercing it through your throat once. Hey you devotee who comes walking with needles in the tongue, why don’t you come piercing it through your eyes once?”, the rally participants were shouting.

Slamming the Dravidar Kazhagam (DK) for passing derogatory remarks against Hindu deities and Hindus, AIADMK spokesperson Kovai Sathyan said that it was Dravidar Kazhagam’s culture to abuse one section of believers, particular Hindus. “The DMK says they are not against any religion or Hindus but it doesn’t take any action and they remain mute spectators”, he said.

BJP spokesperson Narayanan Thirupathy also alleged that such events had happened in the past in the state and no action was taken by the government. “We demand action against MP Venkatesan. DK should be banned in Tamil Nadu if this is to continue,” he said. Union Minister V Muraleedharan also lashed out at the DMK government for taking no action

Arjun Sampath, a member of Hindu Makkal Katchi said that the slogans raised at the rally had hurt the sentiments of the Hindus. Hindu Makkal Katchi had filed a complaint against members of DK on June 2 at the Madurai SS Colony Police after which the police booked four people in the case.

Reportedly, the Tamil Nadu Police has registered an official case against the member of DK and have booked them for purportedly raising slogans against Hindu deities and insulting Hindu rituals during a rally. The police have filed cases under three sections, including insulting religious sentiments and insulting the practice of worship.

Chetan + Shut Up = Chup: Read how Chetan Bhagat gives bizarre ‘Mosples’ suggestion, cites Hagia Sophia to talk about mythical ‘conjoined past’

As the entire country is witnessing heated arguments of reclaiming ancient Hindu temples which were destroyed and converted into Islamic religious structures by Islamic invaders, author-columnist Chetan Bhagat has come up with a bizarre suggesting to the issue, inviting ridicule and jokes form netizens. In a Times of India column published today, he suggested combining the temples and mosques co-existing at the same sites into single structure.

Chetan Bhagat has also coined a name for such ‘hybrid’ religious places, ‘Mosples’, combing the words Mosques and Temples. He also said that controversies like Gyanvapi can be avoided if Hindus and Muslims together celebrate their ‘conjoined past’.

The article is behind a paywall on Times of India website, but is available in the print edition, and Chetan Bhagat posted a image copy of the article on Twitter from TOI e-paper.

While there are lots of examples of temples and mosques, or places worship of other religions, located on adjacent plots, the suggestion of single hybrid place of worship for multiple place is definitely unusual, unprecedented, and bizarre.

While advocating this suggestio=n, Chetan Bhagat cites the example of Hagia Sophia in Istanbul, claiming that it is a ‘church and mosque hybrid of sorts’. This is completely false claim, as the historical place not a combined mosque + church, which he may call ‘morch’. Hagia Sophia has been a Church and a Mosque at different points of time, but it was never the both at the same, it was never a hybrid Church + Mosque as claimed by Chetan Bhagat.

Hagia Sophia was a Church for most part of the history, but it is now a mosque. It was built in sixth century in the Turkish capital Istanbul, at the site of a earlier church destroyed by fire, which it turn was built after the first church was also destroyed by fire. The current structure was completed 537 as the Church of Justinian I, in the name of Emperor Justinian I who started its construction, and remained a church for hundreds of years, till the time the Ottoman forces invaded the city.

Screenshot from Chetan Bhagat’s Mosples article

After capturing the city, Ottomans had converted the Church into a Mosque in 1453, just like Islamic invaders in India had destroyed thousands of temples and converted many of them into mosque. Invader Sultan Mehmed II had ordered to stop all Christian rites and prayers at the Church, and had ordered to immediately convert it into a mosque.

It remained a mosque till 1935, when it was converted into a museum by the first president and founder of the Republic of Turkey, after the fall of the Ottoman empire. Initially religious rituals were banned in the museum, but later in 1991 a pavilion was allowed to be used a prayer room and minarets were allowed to use for voicing the Islamic prayer Azan.

In 2018, the Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdoğan announced his intention to convert Hagia Sophia into a mosque, and it was officially declared a mosque in 2020. Thus, it is a mosque now, where regular Islamic prayers and rituals are held. Moreover, it is now not a ‘top tourist site’ as claimed Bhagat, because it is now a top Islamic site. While non-Muslims can visit the site as tourists, they are not allowed entry into prayer rooms, and have to follow usual rules enforced at Islamic sites.

Hagia Sophia was never a combined church-mosque as falsely claimed by Chetan Bhagat. Instead, it tells the familiar story of Islamic invaders occupying religious places of other religions to convert them into mosques.

The fact that there is no living example of a ‘hybrid’ place of worship for two different religions is a proof that it is a terrible idea. When two Abrahamic religions can’t co-exist in the same site, how two completely different religions can co-exist?

Even if such a site is achieved, it will be subject to constant disputes various issues, and will always remain covered in controversies.

Two different religions at the same site will obviously a logistical nightmare, with different rituals and festivals, many of which overlap. Ultimately, it will be virtually impossible to hold such events at such sites.

Finding the idea bizarre, several netizens mocked Chetan Bhagat for the ‘mosple’ suggestion. They used the same formula of combining two words to respond to it, like Chetan + Shut up = Chup, Vomit + Puke = Voke, Britain + India = Bridia etc.

In the article, Chetan Bhagat accepted that a large number of current mosques have been built after destroying ancient temples, and said that if we start studying each and every mosque, we would be opening a Pandora’s box. While he accepts historical wrongs were committed on Hindus, he is against touching the mosques, supporting the status cue as per the Places of Worship Act.

When Chetan Bhagat accepts that wrongs were done with Hindus and temples were converted to mosques, it is not clear what he means by ‘conjoined past’ of Hindus and Muslims. The Hindu-Muslim past of India is of invasion, of barbaric Muslim rulers destroying temples and slaughtering millions of people. How can it be called ‘conjoined past’, only Chetan Bhagat can tell.

Interestingly, Bhagat made two other suggestions in the same article, which was not highlighted by both Times of India and the author himself. Actually, the ‘mosples’ suggestion was the last of three suggestions, and other two are actually sensible and practical suggestions.

In the first, he has suggested that there should be an exemption in the Places of Worship Act for some temples which were converted to mosques to be converted back. He suggested to identify some sites which are of extremely high importance to Hindus, but the current mosques in those sites don’t have any special significance to Muslims, to reconvert them to temples. Although he said that perhaps the act should cover 99.99% of the sites and exempt the remaining 0.01%, it is a good starting point to resolve the disputes.

Screenshot from Chetan Bhagat’s Mosples article

In the second suggestion, Chetan Bhagat has suggested one community can buy the sites from the other community which is currently occupying the sites. This is also a practical suggestion. While Waqf law bans sale of Islamic sites, if both sites agree, a way around it can be found, which was done in the case of Kashi Vishwanath Corridor, when a plot needed for the project was taken from the Gyanvapi mosque, and another plot was given in an exchange, circumventing the law governing Waqf properties.

Certainly, the Hindus can offer alternative sites to the Muslims to relocate the mosques built on the ruins of ancient temples. While radical Muslims will not agree to any of both these suggestions, these two are definitely better and practical solutions, compared to ‘Mosples’. While it is understood why Times of India chose the most controversial suggestion for the headline, it is not known why Chetan Bhagat also chose it while sharing the article on Twitter. Probably he thinks it is the best idea.

‘Lord Krishna had illicit relationships in his youth’, Hatred for Hindu gods resurfaces on TV as VCK spokesperson defends a Hinduphobic rally

In yet another case of offensive remarks against Hindu Gods, R Vikraman, the spokesperson of the Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Kachi (VCK) party in Tamilnadu, made objectionable remarks about Lord Krishna. He made these remarks while defending the anti-Hindu slogans at a rally in Madurai by his party workers on 29th May 2022. In this rally, it was asked how Krishna and Ayyappa can be Gods.

During the debate on Times Now, he accused Lord Krishna of having illicit relationships in his youth with the Gopis. Vikraman said, “Krishna’s young age life was full of illicit (immoral) love affairs with the women of Vrindavan. It was called Rasleela.” While saying so, he added that all this is written in Puranas.

Co-panelist Rahul Easwar expressed grief and objection to this, saying that Vikraman cannot insult anyone’s God in this way. He said, “The Puranas are a symbolic description. It can’t be taken in the literal meaning. For example, if it is written in the Puranas that Ravana had ten heads; it does not literally mean that he carried ten heads, but it actually means that he was as intelligent as ten men put together. It means that he was a very intelligent and learned person.”

Rahul Easwar further said, “Similarly, whenever someone says that Ayyappa is a son of Lord Shiva and Lord Vishnu, it does not mean that Lord Shiva and Lord Vishnu married each other. All it means is that Ayyappa is a form that integrates both Lord Shiva and Lord Vishnu, and Ayyappa is very significant in bringing two important sects of Hinduism – Vaishnava, and Shaiva- together. Similarly, Lord Krishna’s relationship with Gopis was not illicit but it was a spiritual bond. Making such remarks about Hindu gods and goddesses is nothing but Hinduphobia. Such people want to insult Hindu civilization and beliefs. Therefore, they make such indecent, obscene, and objectionable comments.”

Earlier, on May 29, several outfits in Tamil Nadu like Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi (VCK), Dravidar Viduthalai Kazhagam (DVK), Popular Front of India (PFI), and some other “Periyar-ist” organizations had organized a mega-rally under the name of “Periyariya Unarvalargal Kottamaippu” in Madurai. At this rally, many objectionable slogans were raised against Hindu Gods.

The video from the event went viral on social media and attracted widespread condemnation from the Hindu organizations for the Hinduphobic remarks at the rally.

MIB directs social media platforms to remove controversial ads by ‘Layer’r Shot’ as netizens slam the ad for promoting rape culture: Details

On Saturday (June 4), the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting (MIB) suspended two controversial advertisements by a fragrance brand named Layer’R Shot until an investigation into the matter is concluded.

According to Times Now journalist Prashant Kumar, the MIB has also directed social media platforms such as Youtube and Twitter to take down the videos at the earliest.

The background of the controversy

The development comes a day after two advertisements by the fragrance brand went viral on social media. In one such ad, four men were seen staring at a woman shopping inside a supermarket.

“We are 4 and she is one? Who is going to take the shot (suggesting ejaculation)?” asked a man. Thereafter, he grabbed a bottle of Layer’R shot and remarked that she deserved a shot.

In another ad, a group of friends enter the room of a man, only to find him sitting with his partner. “Looks like you gave a shot,” claimed one of the men. On receiving an affirmative reply, one of the friends proceeded to say that it was time for them to give shots.

Netizens slammed the fragrance brand

In the end, he grabs a bottle of Layer’R shot and sprays it over himself. The sexual innuendo-filled ads were broadcast on TV without any statutory warning. Netizens were miffed with the brand for promoting sexually inappropriate content and glorifying rape culture.

“This layer shot ad gotta be the most f*cked up ad I have seen,” wrote one user.

Screengrab of the tweet

“That Layer Shot ad is horrific. Ban that ad. How can someone even think about writing something like this? How was the idea even approved? How come no one stopped this idea from going ahead? The fact that it made it to our screens is so so wrong. Pathetic!” wrote another user.

Screengrab of the tweet

One Yashasvini Mathur remarked, “The layer shot AD is a travesty and every single person who was part of its approval process must be held accountable. Never did I expect a TV ad to give me the sort of anxiety and flashbacks that plague every woman in a public space. What on earth were they thinking!”

Screengrab of the tweet

The Ad of Layer Shot on @SonyLIV should be banned. What a creepy ad & promoting rape.

Screengrab of the tweet

“Just came across these Layer’r Shot ads. Whoever has been approving these ads must be fired immediately,” one Gaurav Tiwari wrote.

Screengrab of the tweet

Earlier, the Advertising Standards Council of India (ASCI) had raised objections about the derogatory nature of the two advertisements.

“The ad is in serious breach of the ASCI Code and is against public interest. We have taken immediate action and notified the advertiser to suspend the ad, pending investigation,” it had informed.

‘Anti-Tribal mindset’: AAP MP Raghav Chadha says bad officers should be transferred to ‘tribal ministry’ as a punishment posting

Aam Aadmi Party’s Rajya Sabha MP Raghav Chadha is at the center of controversy again. A video of him mocking tribal affairs and calling the tribal affairs ministry a punishment posting appeared on social media on 4th June 2022.

In this video, Raghav Chadha said, “You can’t fire any official from their jobs. Okay? You can only transfer them. If someone is working very well, give him a good department to work in. Make them the health secretary or the home secretary. If someone is doing a bad job, then give them a posting in tribal affairs and say that this is your punishment posting. Something of that sort, right?”

At this point, the interviewer also laughed at this in a manner Chadha was apparently expecting and tried to suggest Raghav Chadha make some corrections to his statement and said, “This is a slightly politically incorrect statement.” But Raghav Chadha continued his remarks saying, “I know it is incorrect but I am trying to make you understand. Send them to horticulture,”

Since the video went viral, several Netizens have severely criticized Raghav Chadha for this attitude towards tribals and Tribal Ministry.

Sharing the video, Bharatiya Janata Party’s Scheduled Tribal Morcha said, “See the petty mentality of Aam Aadmi Party’s Rajya Sabha MP Raghav Chadha towards the tribal community.”

This statement of Raghav Chadha attracted severe criticism on social media as soon as it appeared. Dr. Saibir Neelsehri wrote in his tweet, “His statement is an insult to Tribal department, which is very important department. He should apologize for his casual remark.”

Another Twitter user Hathi Ram tagged Aam Aadmi Party chief and Delhi’s chief minister Arvind Kejriwal in his tweet and asked, “Why do you think tribals are inferior, Arvind Kejriwal Ji? Why do you hate them? Have these innocent tribals done anything wrong to you?”

Mukesh Rathwa, vice president of Gujarat state’s Bharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha, tweeted, “By calling the tribal upliftment department a punishment posting, the Aam Aadmi Party has introduced its “real” ideology how they think of tribals as inferiors.”

Another Twitter user Mushtaq Inqlabi tweeted, “Highly condemnable statement of AAP MP Raghav Chadha against Tribals of India. He hurts our sentiments our dignity and self-respect. Is Arvind Kejriwal having the guts to take action against him? Tribals reject the ideology of AAP.”

This is not the first time that AAP MP Raghav Chadha has made such a controversial statement. On 29th April 2022, Raghav Chadha downplayed the violence that erupted in Punjab’s Patiala after Khalistani hoodlums went on a rampage, shouting ‘Khalistan Zindabad’ slogans and hurling stones and brandishing swords at the revered Maa Kali Temple.

On 20th April 2022, after the anti-encroachment drive began in Delhi’s Jahangirpuri, Aam Aadmi Party leader Raghav Chadha said that Bharatiya Janata Party’s head office should be demolished. He blamed the party for allegedly orchestrating the riots and further said that Home Minister Amit Shah’s house should also be razed to the ground.

‘Duty-bound to protect temple properties’: Madras HC lashes out at Tamil Nadu govt, orders to initiate proceedings to recover the encroached temple land

The Madras HC recently came down heavily on the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments (HR&CE) Department of the Tamil Nadu government asking it to initiate proceedings to recover the encroached lands of Sri Ramanaadheswarar temple at Palnankuppam.

According to Law Beat, the court was hearing a place filed by a devotee of the Sri Rananaadheswarar temple, which urged the court to direct the Commissioner of HR&CE to initiate proceedings to recover three and a half acres of land belonging to the Sri Ramanaadheswarar temple at Palnankuppam from encroachers.

Hearing a plea, Justice Subramaniam of Madras High Court observed that the Hindu Religious Charitable Endowment Department is bound to protect temple properties and their belongings.

“When the petitioner made a complaint that the temple properties are encroached upon without even paying the rent and an attempt is taken to alienate the temple properties, the authorities are duty-bound to conduct enquiry and initiate all appropriate action for the purpose of protecting the temple properties,” the court observed.

Noting that the petitioner’s affidavit revealed that certain transactions had been brought to the attention of the authorities, the Court ordered the Commissioner of HR&CE to take all necessary steps to protect the temple properties, as well as to evict the encroachers and reclaim the temple properties in accordance with the law.

The Commissioner was also given a deadline of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order to finish the exercise.

What the petition filed before the Madras HC read

It may be noted that the petitioner had informed the court that the temple property is being encroached upon without paying any rent to the temple and that the encroachers were also attempting to illegally sell the temple land. It was also said that efforts are being made to manipulate the revenue records and therefore urgent actions are required.

The court was informed that certain illegal transactions had occurred on temple property, which had been brought to the attention of the appropriate authorities, including HR& CE, however, the commissioner did not take any action, and the petitioners were forced to file a writ petition with the court.

After hearing the plea, the court lashed out at the Tamil Nadu government-managed HR&CE Department and ordered it to initiate proceedings to recover the encroached lands of Sri Ramanaadheswarar temple at Palnankuppam at the earliest.

Court slams on Tamil Nadu govt for failing to recover encroached temple lands, warns strong action

It may be recalled that last year too, the Madras HC had come down heavily at that HR&CE department for its failure to act on the increasing complaints filed in the court about the misappropriation of temple properties. The court also warned the department that it might have to come down hard if the Department did not act on its own to recover encroached temple lands.

The observations were made by Chief Justice Sanjib Banerjee and Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy while hearing a contempt of court petition filed against top government officials for having failed to recover the encroached lands of the Agatheshwarar Temple at Nungambakkam. 

Properties of Islamists who rioted in Kanpur to be bulldozed, PFI link being probed: Timeline of events over 9 days that culminated in violence

A day after violence erupted in Kanpur during a protest over alleged ‘blasphemy’ against Prophet Muhammad, the Uttar Pradesh police is scanning CCTV footage to identify all those who indulged in violence. The police are looking into the involvement of the Popular Front of India (PFI) in inciting violence in Kanpur as well after links to the extremist Islamic organization emerged during the investigation.

“More people are being identified on the basis of the video (footage)… action will be taken against conspirators under Gangster Act and their property will be seized or demolished,” Kanpur Police Commissioner Vijay Singh Meena told ANI, adding that the links with PFI or any other organisation behind the violence will also be investigated.

Notably, shortly after the incident, Sufi Kaiser Hasan Majidi, the national president of the Sufi Khanqah Association, released a video accusing PFI of being behind the violence in Kanpur. Majidi demanded a high-level investigation into the situation, claiming that the fact that the violence occurred on a day when both the Prime Minister and the President of India were in the state proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that the riots were pre-planned.

Meanwhile, the police, until now, have arrested thirty-six people on charges of rioting and an attempt to murder. Three FIRs have been filed in which 40 people have been named and 1,000 others have been listed.

CM Yogi Adityanath invokes Gangster Act against perpetrators, orders cops to bulldoze properties of miscreants

Yogi Adityanath, the Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh, has taken cognizance of the incident and directed the UP Director General of Police (DGP) and state Chief Secretary, as well as the additional chief secretary, home, to use the Gangster Act and the National Security Act (NSA) against the troublemakers, imposing the strictest sections to serve as a deterrent to others.

Yogi Adityanath has further ordered authorities to act against the perpetrators under the National Security Act (NSA). The police have been ordered to confiscate the properties of the perpetrators and use bulldozers if necessary so that, in future, no one dares to spoil the atmosphere in the state by spreading communal fury.

Notably, during the violence that took place in Kanpur on June 3, 2022, hundreds of Islamists clashed with the State Police and other civilians and pelted stones in the Becongunj area near Yatimkhana after the Friday Namaz. According to reports, the Islamists had singled out the Hindus by their names and assaulted them. The violence erupted after the Muslim community had given a call for a shutdown in the area to protest against BJP spokesperson Nupur Sharma, and the shutdown turned violent after the Friday prayers.

The Police responded to the violence and lathi-charged some of the protesters. While they tried to get the situation under control, fierce stone pelting continued intermittently.

This act of violence was not one that happened spontaneously, but actually a culmination of a series of well-thought events that occurred over the past nine days, ending in the Kanpur clash.

The sequence of events which eventually led to the Kanpur clash

May 26: BJP Spokesperson Nupur Sharma participated in a news debate on the disputed Gyanvapi structure hosted by Times Now, wherein she argued that since people are mocking the Hindu faith repeatedly, they can also mock other religions referring to Islamic beliefs. Taking that video out of context, propaganda website AltNews, which usually waters down crimes of Islamists, cofounder Mohammed Zubair dog-whistled an online mob against Sharma, accusing her of insulting Prophet Muhammad. He was supported by other Islamists, many of whom issued death and rape threats to her and her family.

Image credit: Dainik Bhaskar

May 27: Hayat Zafar Hashmi, president of Maulana Mohammad Ali Jauhar Fans Association called for a market shutdown as a mark of protest against Nupur Sharma for allegedly committing ‘blasphemy’ against Prophet Muhammad. Posters were put up in Kanpur against the BJP spokesperson who was accused of hurting the religious sentiments of the minority community.

May 28: Hayat Zafar Hashmi, who has been accused of masterminding the Kanpur riots, announced a ‘Jail Bharo Andolan’ on June 3. Posters of the event were put up in various parts of Kanpur.

May 30: Hayat held a meeting with members of the Muslim community.

June 1: Hayat postponed the Jail Bharo protests until June 5, but the posters of the June 3 event were not removed.

June 2: an appeal was made to close the shops again in the Beconganj area to protest against BJP spokesperson Nupur Sharma.

June 3: Since morning, there was an unsettling silence in Beconganj. The Muslim community owned the majority of the shops in the region, which remained shut on that day. Only a few shops owned by Hindus in the market near the Yateem Khana Parade, Kanpur, remained open. Friday prayers were held at the mosque adjacent to the Yateem Khana Parade at 1:45 pm. Around 2.30 pm, Islamists emerged from the mosque and began forcibly closing shops owned by Hindus in the market.

When Hindu shopkeepers refused to close their stores, certain miscreants within the Islamist mob stormed one Chandresh’s home and began throwing stones. After that, the situation in the entire area began to deteriorate. Some nefarious individuals in the crowd also fired some shots.

The scuffle, which began in the market had now evolved into a full-fledged riot, with hundreds of enraged Islamists gathering at the parade intersection and resorting to stone-pelting. The situation swiftly spiralled out of control. The cops who reached the spot found it difficult to control the riots that had quickly spread into the narrow lanes in the area.

The Police responded to the violence and lathi-charged some of the protesters. To bring the situation under control, teams of about 12 police stations were rushed to the scene. After nearly 5 hours, the situation was ultimately brought under control. Many properties had been damaged by then, and at least six individuals had been injured as a result of the violence.

Are they always ready? Visuals from Kanpur violence by Islamists show a hint of pre-planning: What it means

On 3rd June 2022, an Islamist mob in Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, went on a rampage, pelting stones against ‘Kafir’ Hindus. According to reports, Hindus were singled out by name before the mob attacked them brutally. In one such instance, a rickshaw driver was stopped and asked his name. When he identified himself as Mukesh, a Hindu, he was assaulted by the Muslim mob with a stick landing on his head, injuring him critically.

The irate mob went on a rampage because they were “protesting” against the statements by BJP spokesperson Nupur Sharma. In a TimesNow debate, she had responded to Islamist panellists insulting the Shivling found at the Gyanvapi complex by repeatedly calling it a “fountain”. She asked them to stop mocking her faith. She then asked them how they would feel if she proceeded to mock Islam. In doing so, she quoted two facts as mentioned in Islamic Hadiths. This was taken as an affront, and as we saw with Kamlesh Tiwari, Muslims across India started dog-whistling against her. In an all too familiar cacophony, we started hearing and reading the chants of “Gustakh-e-Rasool ki saza, sar tan se juda” – on social media and on the streets.

There were two fatwas issued against Nupur Sharma – one from Pakistan and one by AIMIM (Inquilab) India – that announced a massive reward to any “believer” who would behead her.

In Kanpur, news has now emerged that the authorities are probing the role of PFI in the violence and would be taking appropriate action. Bulldozers are still in play and the cops say that once identified, their properties could be demolished.

The visuals from the Kanpur violence that emerged showed a mob of hundreds of Muslims pelting stones with all their might. The sheer force of the stones and bricks that landed on the road was evident from the cloud of dust that emerged from the impact.

Here is a still from that violence.

Kanpur violence

While the wrath of the intolerant minority hardly surprises anyone anymore, what was interesting to notice in some of the videos that emerged was the hint of careful pre-planning.

In a video tweeted by a Navbharat Times journalist, one could see that the Muslim mob was picking up the stones they were hurling from a hand-cart (thela).

Here is a still from the video where one can see a cart, laden with bricks and stones, being used by the Muslim mob to cart their weapons around.

Kanpur violence

In another visual posted by the same reporter, one Muslim man could be seen handing out bricks to other members of the mob. It seems like the cart laden with stones and weapons was hidden at the side of the curb.

Often, when such violence erupts, the Islamist and Left lobby that acts as the ideological shield of the foot-soldiers actually pelting stones, claim that the violence was spontaneous. The mob’s feelings got hurt, and they, overnight, simply decided to come out on the streets to display their ire. Not just that, they go a step further most times to claim, despite video evidence to the contrary, that it was the Hindus who started the violence and the poor Muslim mob was merely defending itself by pelting stones – stones that they apparently just find lying around on the side of the road at any given point of time.

In the Kanpur case as well, an attempt is being made to blame the Hindus for violence that the Islamists initiated after protesting against innocuous remarks by BJP spokesperson Nupur Sharma, who has 2 fatwas against her to behead her, by the way.

The dog-whistling came from a “journalist” of Maktoob Media. He claimed that it was a “Hindu mob” that pelted stones when poor Muslims were merely shutting shops to protest against “blasphemous” statements by Nupur Sharma. Of course, because history shows us just how innocent these mobs are, his assertions are completely ‘believable’.

To put things into perspective, a report has revealed that after Friday prayers, the Muslim mob began forcing Hindus in the Beconganj district to close their shops. When they objected, the enraged mob began throwing stones at Hindus. The Islamists insisted on knowing the names of the people, and those who were Hindus were attacked.

While these attempts to put the blame on the Hindu community succeed in the international media, the video evidence proves, beyond doubt, that the Muslim mob initiated the violence, angered by the mere presence of Hindus, who did not want to shut their shops to partake in a violent protest against a fellow Hindu.

Coming back to the visuals, something far more sinister could be seen in the visuals of the violence. There seemed to be a coordinated effort to ensure that the weapons they would need when violence erupts, were easily accessible for the mob that would go on to indulge in violence.

The cart that is seen in the video is laden with stones. Now, the important question that must be answered is whether people are expected to believe that the bricks and stones magically appeared on the cart, to be made accessible to the riotous mob. One has to remember that the violence erupted after Jumma Namaz on Friday.

This is not the first time that we have seen this phenomenon. In several cases of violence, we have seen violence erupt after Namaz, where the Islamist mob becomes irate after coming out of the mosque. During the Delhi riots, there was an image of a mosque in Northeast Delhi where bricks and stones were clearly seen lying around on the roof.

Visuals from Delhi anti-Hindu riots 2020

In this particular video, not only mosques but large heaps of stones were stored on the terraces of various residences, which can be clearly seen in the video indicating that the Muslim mobs had meticulously planned for the anti-Hindu riots by strategically placing arms and ammunitions to unleash violence against the Hindus. Interestingly, with the media playing the shield for the Islamists, NDTV craftily cropped the image of bricks atop the mosque to shield the Islamists from scrutiny.

It is rather evident that Islamists are almost always ready with bricks, stones and other weapons in case they need to indulge in violence against either the police force or the Hindu community at large.

Even in the Kanpur violence, the fact that bricks and stones were laid out on the hand cart for the mob to use only indicates that there is a high chance that Islamists seem to have collected enough weapons, stones and other tools that they can use to cause damage in the event of a riot. These would especially happen in areas that “liberals” declare as “Muslim areas” from where if Ram Navami processions pass, they are met with unbridled violence. While the Islamists seem to get away with this with the help of the Left and the media, playing the part of their ideological shield, Hindus appear woefully unprepared to defend themselves from this Islamist onslaught.

With the Islamists seeming to be prepared for violence and the Hindu community unprepared to even defend themselves, the role of organisations like Bajrang Dal and VHP cannot be underscored. It is a fact that when Hindus come under attack, it is indeed these organisations that come to their defence. For example, during the Hauz Qazi violence or the several cases of Grooming Jihad where Hindu girls were abducted and raped, it is these Hindu organisations that rise to the occasion to defend the honour of Hindu women and the lives of Hindu men.

Hindus need to be aware of the demographic challenge that India is facing, perhaps for the first time in the post-partition era and that violence from the Islamists is seldom spontaneous and often planned. The question that remains is how the Hindu community plans to defend itself.