Home Blog Page 4028

How TMC is helping Congress: Absorbing the most toxic elements in the anti-Modi brigade

Even the most loyal supporter of BJP will concede that Rahul Gandhi plays a huge role in PM Modi’s electoral victories. Without Rahul baba’s stupidity on constant display, his laziness, his sense of entitlement, the BJP would have to work significantly harder for votes. No matter how unhappy people get, you go ask them if they would rather have Rahul Gandhi in charge. The answer would be a resounding NO.

Because Rahul is not qualified, for pretty much anything. At some level, it is not even his fault. Here is an individual of very low intellect, who was told from an early age that he doesn’t need to work hard. That’s why he has grown up to be the total train wreck that he is.

Rahul Gandhi’s presence makes PM Modi’s life easier. No doubt. But to be fair, it is more of a team effort. The Congress has in its orbit a bunch of highly unlikeable individuals, whose net effect is to repel votes from the party.

Who are these people? Some are loudmouths, who understand only how to be nasty and spew venom. Others are retired bureaucrats for instance, with shiny pedigrees, an imperial education on their resume, outdated British accents and so on. Over the years the Congress gave them (and usually their dads and mums and uncles and aunts before them) high sounding titles and access to the most privileged social circles. These people can only respond to the rise of Modi with nasty personal comments, or elitist and classist jibes about his humble background. But India has changed. Their royal insignia, their haughty manner and high society air impress nobody. Instead, they put people off. Every time they speak, they bolster the PM’s personal image as a man of the masses, and a karma yogi that everyone can look up to.

The Prime Minister has another group of force multipliers, who are to be found in the ranks of the NGO classes. The loosely hanging jholas of the latter have already become a meme, as much as their unkempt beards or their activism in general. These are the people who move from one think tank to another, wading through five-star circles, churning out one report after another on “democracy index,” “press freedom index,” “communalism,” “human rights,” or any combination thereof. They make familiar noises on Kashmir, Naxalites, environmentalism and so on. If there is a position that is anti-national (and more importantly, deeply unpopular), you can count on these people to pick it up and run with it. Earlier this year, when the Prime Minister coined the term andolan jeevi, it took him half a second to conjure the image he wanted in the mind of every person.

For a long time now, these people have been turning voters away from Congress. Most of them are not even officially members of Congress. But because Congress is the only national-level alternative to BJP, people tend to assume that they are loosely associated with the Congress anyway. Most of these activist types have acquired a ‘national’ profile, by having too many media friends. The things they say tend to rub off on Congress.

It works both ways, really. Rahul Gandhi is not capable of producing his own ideas on how to position Congress politically. So he ends up outsourcing the task to the NGO activist classes. In turn, these activists have dragged Congress towards their own priorities, which are either deeply unpopular or irrelevant to common people. As a result, the Congress party itself ends up repelling votes. Because the jester is running the court.

There are many examples of this. Look no further than the current session of parliament. The Congress could have gone to town on a number of issues such as inflation, petrol prices, pandemic management and so on. But a handful of media liberals hijacked the entire attention of the Congress party over what came to be known as the “Pegasus issue.” Nobody knows for sure what the issue is, nor why they should care. As Congress ranted on something called “Pegasus,” the government was able to pass bills on real issues such as insurance, taxation, deposit guarantees, tribunals, and even reservation. The government looked like it had serious work to do, the opposition did not.

As with questioning the Balakot strikes, or demanding “proof” of the earlier surgical strikes, bad ideas began with the activist class, not the Congress itself. These people suffer from compulsive hatred against Modi. And because Modi is PM, they project their hatred on the nation itself. Only yesterday, one such individual was mocking ISRO for the failure of the cryogenic engine onboard the GSLV. The reason? This individual could only remember how much he hates Modi. They cannot help themselves. Again, as the big national alternative to BJP, Congress ends up bearing the blame for these non-members.

This is where the TMC could provide surprise relief for Congress. Most of these non-members are fed up with Rahul Gandhi and how ineffective he is. They see Mamata Banerjee’s political savvy, they like her obsessive anti-Modi venom and her brutal style. The TMC is now becoming a magnet for these people.

On one hand, the TMC would do almost anything for a ‘national’ profile. And these obsessive-compulsive Modi-haters can provide some illusion of that. By going with TMC, the andolan jeevi types can also put some distance between themselves and Rahul Gandhi’s ineptness. It’s a match made in heaven. In other words, the TMC is beginning to absorb those toxic elements which have only cost the Congress party votes. This gives Rahul Gandhi an opportunity to let real politicians determine the fate of the Congress party, instead of unpopular, unelectable activists that everyone hates. The BJP better be careful.

China to ban karaoke songs containing ‘illegal content’, to create a blacklist of songs that endanger national unity

The Communist regime in China is mulling to introduce new measures of censorship to filter out what it assumes to be ‘illegal content’. As per the latest diktat from the Ministry of Culture and Tourism on Tuesday (August 10), China will blacklist songs containing ‘illegal content’ from karaoke venues in the country from October 1 onwards.

As per reports, the Chinese government has clarified that illegal content would include the songs that “endangers national unity, sovereignty or territory integrity; violates China’s religious policies and spreads cults and superstitions; and advocates obscenity, gambling, violence and drug-related crimes or instigating crimes”. The Ministry of Culture and Tourism said that content providers, engaged with karaoke venues, would audit the songs. It must be mentioned that the country has over 50,000 karaoke venues with a basic music library of over 1 lakh songs. With the new guidelines, the venue operators are faced with an uphill task to scrutiny the songs for ‘illegal content.’

China has also directed the content providers to supply the music, which is healthy and uplifting, to the entertainment venues. The Communist regime in the country removes content such as comments critical of the ruling CCP, pornography, and violence from social media platforms. It has also penalised live streaming platforms for supposedly hosting ‘low taste’ content. According to South China Morning Post (SCMP), the country has earlier censored songs with titles such as ‘I Love Taiwanese Girls,’ ‘Fart,’ ‘Beijing Hooligans’ and ‘Don’t Want to Go to School.’

Chinese government bans BBC for ‘false and partial reporting’

Earlier in February this year, the Chinese media regulator – National Radio and Television Administration in a statement said that they would ban BBC World News. It said that BBC’s coverage on China had violated guidelines of ‘true and impartial’ reporting that undermined China’s national interests and ethnic solidarity. “The channel fails to meet the requirements to broadcast in China as an overseas channel,” the Radio and Television Administration said, stating that it would not accept BBC’s broadcast application for the following year. Reacting to the Chinese ban, the BBC said it was “disappointed”. The United States, along with the UK, had condemned China’s decision to ban the BBC in that country.

Tamil Nadu: Pastor Christhudoss arrested for sexually abusing an 11-year-old child

A Christian pastor has been arrested by the Tamil Nadu police for sexually abusing an 11-year-old girl in Srivilliputhur, Tamil Nadu.

According to the reports, a complaint was filed by one Vinnarasu, a resident of Indira Nagar, Srivilliputhur, accusing the Christian pastor Christhudoss of misbehaving with his 11-year-old daughter. After filing the complaint, Vinnarasu, along with his wife and two daughters, had left the town.

Later, the Srivilliputhur Town police filed a missing complaint and investigated the complaint filed against the pastor. The investigations revealed that the Pastor allegedly sexually abused the minor schoolgirl studying in Class 6.

The police registered a case against the pastor under the section of the POCSO Act in the Srivilliputhur All Women Police Station on August 6. After investigating, the police arrested pastor Chirsthudoss for sexually abusing the minor girl.

Old letter of BJP MP Sunny Deol asking for out of turn delivery of Mahindra Thar for MLA’s daughter goes viral

Recently, actor Sunny Deol found himself in a controversy after he was found using his political powers to expedite the delivery of a new car for an MLA’s daughter The contentious letter (SDMP/84/MISC/2021), bearing the official government seal, was originally written on February 21 this year.

In his letter, he wrote, “Ms Surbhi Thakur, daughter of Shri Dinesh Singh Thakur, having close acquaintance with me has booked black coloured Mahindra Thar LX HT MT diesel model with your agency vide receipt No. 16687 dated 20.01.2021 for Rs. 21,900/-“.

Screengrab of the letter by Sunny Deol

Sunny Deol further escalated the issue with the authorities and wrote, “Considering the exigency for use of the vehicle, I would request you to kindly have the said vehicle delivered to her against the above booking on out of turn Priority basis.”

Gurdaspur MP Sunny Deol’s letter was addressed to one JS Grover of JS Grover Autos Ltd., the office of which is located in the Pathankot district of Punjab.

It is notable here that Dinesh Singh Thakur alias Babbu is the MLA from Sujanpur. Several Congress leaders and social media users questioned the MP using his official power to ask for an out of turn delivery of a car for an MLA’s daughter.

In Punjab, several Congress leaders have criticised the letter too. Sunny Deol is being trolled on social media after the February letter went viral.

Sunny Deol had appointed representative to attend meetings on his behest

Earlier, Gurdaspur MP Sunny Deol had faced criticism after he appointed a representative to attend meetings and follow important matters in his constituency during his absence. The actor-turned-politician issued a statement in 2019 appointing Gurpreet Singh Palheri, resident of village Palheri in Mohali as his representative in Gurdaspur. Deol later explained that he appointed his Personal Assitant to ensure a smooth flow of work when he was not present in his constituency.

He claimed that the intention of the same was to ensure that no work was disrupted or delayed when he was not in the constituency, and to ensure that he was updated about the same on a regular basis. Deol added that as an elected representative, he was genuinely committed to the cause of Gurdaspur.

Community of Sant’Egidio: All you need to know about the org that allegedly invited Mamata Banerjee to ‘global peace event’

West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee has reportedly been invited by Marco Impagliazzo, president of the Community of Sant’Egidio, for an international peace event, ‘Peoples as Brothers, Future for Earth’. Pope Francis, German Chancellor Angela Merkel and Great Imam of Al Azhar (Egypt) Ahmad Al Tayyib have also been invited, reports say.

The letter, sent on the 22nd of July, reportedly congratulated Mamata Banerjee “on your significant election and for the important work for social justice, for the development of your country and, therefore, for peace, which you have been doing for over ten years now”.

The invite is also reported to have said, “Allow me to tell you that I feel your commitment and your generous battles in favor of the weakest and most disadvantaged, very close to my sensitivity and to the work of the Community of Sant’Egidio in Rome and in all the world.”

The suspicious bit about the news is that it has only been covered by Indian media. Given that Pope Francis and Angela Merkel have been invited, one would have expected coverage of the news in western media but that is apparently not the case.

And given the West Bengal Chief Minister’s previous experiences with global awards, especially the one that claimed to have been associated with the UN, there is reason for much caution.

Nevertheless, media reports in India say that Mamata Banerjee may not attend the event after all as the dates clash with Mahalaya, a very joyous occasion for Bengalis across the world and one that the Chief Minister is expected to spend with citizens here.

However, it is a good time perhaps to learn a bit more about the organisation behind the event in question.

What is the Community of Sant’Egidio?

According to its website, “Sant’Egidio is a Christian community born in 1968, right after the second Vatican Council. An initiative of Andrea Riccardi, it was born in a secondary school in the centre of Rome. With the years, it has become a network of communities in more than 70 countries of the world.”

Andrea Riccardi is a former Minister of Italy. A historian, politician, activist and professor, Riccardi served as the Minister for Integration and International Cooperation without portfolio in the Mario Monti government that served for 18 months.

The Community focuses on the poor and refugees, leading several efforts for the welfare of migrants. It also works for the homeless, HIV/AIDS patients and the destitute.

Source: Website

Nonetheless, the Community has had its share of controversies. A memoir of a former member of the Community caused quite the stir. In the memoir, the former member alleged that the authoritarian system that governed the lives of the community members had led to his separation from his wife through ‘coercion’.

In the memoir, the former member, identified as ‘G.F.’, says, “Both of G.’s parents were annoyed to see that their daughter, after beginning to frequent the community of Sant’Egidio, was often gone, did not come home for lunch or dinner, and didn’t even spend Christmas with the family. They had many discussions until she, with the support of the community, left home and stayed with one friend in the community, then with another. She didn’t tell her parents where she was living, and rarely called them. Her mother pleaded with her, but she said she was proud to have left her family to dedicate herself body and soul to the service of the community.”

The memoir said further, after elaborating that marriages were often arranged by the Community, “The most observant plan with their spiritual father whether or not to have children, whether to have a child immediately or after a few years. One of my friends was saddened to the point of tears when his wife, after he told her that he wanted a child, replied that he would first need to consult his spiritual mother.”

“Some of the couples within the community decide themselves not to have children, but frequently it is the spiritual parents who do not want them to have children, and they use their influence on the couples. In the face of the confusion of people outside the community, the usual responses are: “We’ll have one in a few years,” or “It just hasn’t happened yet.” Some have adopted children,” it added.

The person said about his marriage, “Returning to my girlfriend: she quickly became pregnant […] and in a little over two months we were married. In this brief period, I had to meet with all of my spiritual parents, old and new, and undergo their criticisms, accept their accusations of immaturity, thoughtlessness, and male chauvinism.”

He stated, “I cannot remember a more embarrassing day in my entire life than that one: I was about to marry a woman I did not love; I was ashamed to present her to my family; I felt the judgment of the community weighing upon me; I was waiting for I child I hadn’t wanted; my future was uncertain, and I was afraid.”

International Diplomacy

The Community of Sant’Egidio also participated heavily in matters of global politics and diplomacy. Franco de Courten, Italian Ambassador to Algeria between 1996 to 1998, criticised in harsh words the Community’s diplomatic efforts.

In his memoirs, he said, “I went to visit the archbishop of Algiers, Msgr. [Henri] Teissier. […] He had particularly harsh words to say about “some Algerian political exponents who, by taking advantage of terrorism and proposing negotiations with extremists, wanted to rise to positions of power.” From his references to the so-called “St. Egidio Group” and particularly to Aït Ahmed´s FFS party, I understood clearly what he meant. […] By “St. Egidio Group” he meant Algerian political parties (not all of them and especially not government representatives) which in Rome in 1994, via an initiative proposed by St. Egidio (an organization normally concerned with helping the poor) and with our government´s own quiet blessing, had signed their names to a political platform with some FIS [Islamic Salvation Front] exponents.”

It continued, “The purpose of the platform was to reach a negotiated solution to the Algerian crisis. Immediately afterward, things had changed substantially; some of the signing parties became disassociated and the Islamist participants were ever the more marginalized, saying in public statements they refused to abandon armed conflict. Meanwhile terrorism raged all the more. Even if the initiative failed (and nobody doubts this), St. Egidio has continued in all ways and in every community to re-launch the idea and to seek dialog and negotiation.”

Another memoir said, “The archbishop spoke poorly about St. Egidio. Among other things he asked me if the Italian government was behind the community´s foreign ” policy.” […] Msgr. Teissier vehemently expressed his disappointment regarding the content of a book written on the Algeria situation. It was a book recently published in Italy by St. Egidio community exponents. […] He told me that book contained affirmations (some of which were false) which might jeopardize the safety of his colleagues, not to mention the French, and to some degree, even the Italian community in Algeria.”

One of the Courten’s memoirs shows that not even the Algerians were happy with the Community. The memoir from January, 1997 stated, “Algerians had huge problems with an interview about Algeria which in my view was a mistake. The interview was given by [Piero] Fassino, one of the foreign affairs undersecretaries and appeared in the [Italian leftist daily] “L´Unità”. […] I fear that both Aït Ahmed and St. Egidio´s positions are given too much attention and without deep consideration in Rome and within the PDS [of which Fassino is a member]. […] I was urgently summoned to the Algerian ministry of foreign affairs, […] where Ambassador [Amar] Bendjama told me if Rome “intends to reopen the St. Egidio Group, it is free to do so. But it must expect crisis to occur between the two countries.””

Community of Sant’Egidio shares a close relationship with Pope Francis

The Community celebrated its 50th anniversary in 2018 and the Mass on the occasion was presided over by Italian Cardinal Pietro Parolin, the Vatican’s Secretary of State and the most senior aide to Francis. During the event, Parolin heaped praises on the organisation.

Pope Francis had visited the headquarters of the organisation, which describes itself as a lay movement, in 2014. Within the Church, it has the reputation of being a center-left social justice Catholic platform.

Given its antecedents, its move to invite Mamata Banerjee to one of its events is indeed surprising, if it is indeed true. Pope Francis and Angela Merkel are heads of countries, it is unclear where a Chief Minister figures into this. But given the Church’s interference in Indian domestic political issues, it would not be surprising in the least bit.

Nonetheless, OpIndia reached out to them for a confirmation of the invite but has not received any response. We will update our report with the response if and when it arrives.

Rahul Gandhi slams Twitter but the symbiotic relationship between the two reveal it may just be a part of political shadow-boxing: Here is how

Earlier today, senior Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, who seems to be still smarting from the snub of being locked out by Twitter for compromising the identity of a rape victim, took to YouTube to lambast and threaten the social media behemoth. In his video, Gandhi slammed Twitter for being biased and acting as a puppet of the ruling government.

A video slightly longer than one-and-a-half-minute titled “Twitter’s Dangerous Game” was released on Rahul Gandhi’s official YouTube channel. The Gandhi scion, in the video, alleged that Twitter was interfering in India’s politics by shutting down his account. “A company is making its business to define our politics. And as a politician, I don’t like it,” Gandhi said.

Gandhi further claimed that shutting his account down was akin to denying his 19 to 20 million followers a right to an opinion. The Wayanad MP also accused Twitter of being obliged to the central government. “It is obvious now that Twitter is not a neutral platform. It is a biased platform which heeds to the directives of the government of the day,” Gandhi said.

Gandhi’s trenchant criticism of Twitter comes a day after the microblogging website had blocked the official account of the Congress party and accounts of other Congress leaders after they were found in violation of the POCSO (Protection of Children from Sexual Offence) Act by revealing the identity of a rape victim. The party and its leaders had been foolishly tweeting the contentious image in solidarity with Rahul Gandhi in defiance of the law of the land, which proscribes the disclosure of the identity of a rape victim.

While Rahul Gandhi can keep grumbling about accounts being locked as an attempt to muzzle their freedom of expression, the question here is not about the curtailment of individual rights, but about the violation of the (Protection of Children from Sexual Offence) Act. Rahul Gandhi and other Congress-affiliated accounts violated one of the provisions of the POCSO Act by sharing pictures on social media websites that could compromise the identity of the rape victim. It is for this violation that their accounts had been locked out.

However, Rahul Gandhi, in his tirade against Twitter, accused the microblogging website of being a “puppet” whose strings are in the hands of the government of the day. These allegations seem to be a part of an elaborate ruse that Twitter India and Congress have put up, just to project the former as “neutral” after it was exposed for its anti-Modi prejudice.

Twitter stands exposed for its conspicuous favouritism for the Congress party

As such, there have been countless incidents in the past when Twitter’s favouritism for the Congress party has been writ large through its conduct. Twitter was awfully lethargic in countering fake news and misinformation peddled by Congress leaders and their sympathisers, a trait uncharacteristic of the social media behemoth which chomps at the bit of assuming the role of a content regulator and summarily dishing out labels of ‘manipulated content’. It allowed its platform to be used for promoting vaccine hesitancy when Congress leader Gaurav Pandhi made misleading claims about the content of indigenously developed Covaxin.

Twitter was even found doing Congress’ bidding after the party asked the social media organisation of carrying out a detailed investigation in connection with the ‘toolkit fiasco’ and suspend the Twitter accounts of BJP leaders that shared the toolkit allegedly linked to the Congress party. Within a day, Twitter promptly obliged to Congress party’s request and marked the tweet carrying the photo of the Congress toolkit as ‘manipulated media’. When police contacted Twitter to ask on what basis it labelled the tweets posted by BJP leaders as fake, it refused to share the ‘evidence’.

Well, this was not the first incident when Twitter had displayed unmatched alacrity in marking tweets put out by BJP leaders as ‘manipulated media’, even when those tweets were meant to debunk patently misleading information shared by the Congress leaders, including their former president Rahul Gandhi.

In December 2020, BJP IT Cell head Amit Malviya shared a video debunking the lies peddled by the Congress leaders. Malviya shared a video in response to an image shared by Rahul Gandhi wherein he insinuated that the police was beating up an old farmer. But instead of marking Rahul Gandhi’s tweet as ‘manipulated media’, Twitter marked Amit Malviya’s tweet as misleading content.

Later in March 2021, Congress IT Cell head Rohan Gupta shared a cropped video from PM Modi’s rally in Assam on Twitter. PM Modi in the video had called out the Congress formula of keeping the poor poor and exploiting them for electoral gains. However, the snippet shared by Gupta was carefully cropped to give an impression that PM Modi was advocating the exploitation of the poor for votes.

Gupta conveniently edited out the part in which PM Modi elaborated on how it was the Congress modus operandi of preying on the poor and making false promises to them to win their votes. However, Twitter did not bother to mark Gupta’s tweet as ‘manipulated media’.

Twitter India engages in shadow boxing with Congress as it falls out of favour with the Centre

Twitter, on the other hand, raised the hackles of the central government with its blatant bias in the toolkit fiasco. The response from the Indian government was severe and unrelenting. A new digital law was soon notified, asking social media organisations operating in the country to abide by the law or risk losing legal indemnity. While all social media companies fell in line and complied with the law, Twitter, in its hubris, did not follow the law and cried hoarse that the Indian government was suppressing the freedom of expression.

The Indian government, however, remained undaunted by Twitter’s objections and asked the social media behemoth to follow the rules or face the consequences. As a result, Twitter lost its intermediary status and was now liable to face prosecution. The BJP government at the centre has made it clear to Twitter that it will be treated at par with other social media organisations, with no special treatment being extended to the social media giant.

With Twitter falling out of favour with the central government, Twitter India and Congress seem to be engaged in shadow-boxing to once again prove that they indeed do not have a “liberal” bias but are neutral. However, if the above instances are anything to go by, they reveal the symbiotic relationship that Twitter India and the Congress party share with each other.

In fact, one cannot rule out that this entire charade is being put up so that when Twitter starts suspending BJP or “right leaning” accounts in the run-up to Uttar Pradesh elections, arbitrarily and unfairly, as it has in the past, Twitter can simply claim that it is “neutral” because it even locked the account of Rahul Gandhi. The Congress itself would also shut down any criticism of Twitter later saying that they are not a “biased platform”. It is pertinent to note that Twitter does indeed meddle in democracies and fancies itself as an arbitrator of information, however, that criticism, as true as it may be, seems misplaced when it comes from the Congress party that seems to be using the tech-giant to silent voices of differing political ideologies.

Therefore, Rahul Gandhi’s latest protestation that Twitter is a “puppet” and acting at the behest of the Modi government is not only profoundly misleading but also a shoddy attempt to cast the social media giant as “neutral” or perhaps “anti-Congress”.

China prepared to recognise the Taliban if it overthrows Ashraf Ghani government in Afghanistan: Report

China is willing to accept the Taliban as the legitimate rule of Afghanistan if the terror group manages to usurp the power from the democratically elected government in Kabul, a report published in the US News said.

While China has publicly pressurised the terrorist group to sign a peace agreement with President Ashraf Ghani’s democratically elected government, new Chinese military and intelligence assessment of the realities on the ground have caused leaders in the Chinese Communist Party to prepare to formalise their relationship with the terror group, the US News report said while quoting multiple U.S. and foreign intelligence sources familiar with the Chinese assessments.

The move comes in the midst of a relentless Talibani blitz that has resulted in the fall of at least 11 provincial capitals, including one near Kabul, along with large expanses of territories bordering China. The military offensive also undercuts the US efforts to persuade the terrorist group to honour its words and return in good faith to diplomatic negotiations in Doha, Qatar, where America’s envoy travelled for a new round of talks.

The power vacuum in Afghanistan has provided China with both challenges and opportunities. The challenges are because the Taliban represent the Islamic extremism that China claims it is fighting in Xinjiang, the province that borders Afghanistan. Despite its blossoming relationship with the Taliban, China had expressed concerns about the group’s ties with the East Turkestan Islamic Movement (ETIM), which is considered a domestic security threat. The opportunities for China lay in terms of filling the partial vacuum that it could fill after the Western countries withdraw from the strife-torn region.

The recent US and NATO withdrawal after a protracted 20-year-war in Afghanistan has catalysed the emergence of the Taliban, which has seized on the opportunity by making swift advances across the country and now threatens to overpower the Kabul government. According to analysts, the Taliban is strong enough to overthrow the Ashraf Ghani government in Kabul within 30 to 90 days.

“If the Taliban claim to want international legitimacy, these actions are not going to get them the legitimacy they seek,” White House spokeswoman Jen Psaki said Friday. “They could choose to devote the same energy to their peace process as they are to their military campaign. We strongly urge them to do so.”

When the last time Taliban ruled Afghanistan during 1996-2001, only four nations had recognised its government, Pakistan, Turkmenistan, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE). If the Taliban recaptures the country again, it is expected that Pakistan will be among the first to recognise the govt this time also, as it is actively aiding the Taliban.

Talibani delegation visits China to meet Foreign Minister

China recently also had a meeting with visiting Talibani delegation. During the meeting, Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi held talks with Taliban delegates led by Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar. In the meeting, Beijing had conveyed its apprehensions that under Taliban rule, Afghanistan will become a hub for the Uyghur separatist outfit East Turkistan Islamic Movement (ETIM).

East Turkestan Islamic Movement (ETIM) is an Uyghur separatist group, aligned to Al-Qaeda, that has long sought independence for the Chinese province of Xinjiang.

Amidst the ongoing UN troop withdrawal and the Talibani offensive to regain control of the country, several hundred members of the East Turkestan Islamic Movement (ETIM) has remained active in several districts of Afghanistan. In their bid to establish an Uyghur state in Xinjiang, China, the group facilitates the movement of fighters from Afghanistan to China.

After Twitter, NCPCR asks Facebook to remove video posted by Rahul Gandhi on Instagram, compromising identity of the minor rape victim: Details

The National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) has issued a notice to social media giant Facebook, calling for action against senior Congress leader Rahul Gandhi for violating the POCSO (Protection of Children from Sexual Offences) Act by posting videos of the parents of a nine-year-old girl who was allegedly raped and murdered in Delhi on his Instagram profile.

In a letter to micro-blogging site Facebook Inc, which owns social media platform Instagram, National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) registrar Anu Chaudhary has stated that the commission has come across a video on the Instagram profile of Gandhi-scion Rahul Gandhi wherein the identity of minor girl victim’s family was disclosed.

NCPCR’s letter to Facebook asking them to take action against Rahul Gandhi

According to the notice issued by the NCPCR, the video shared by Rahul Gandhi on Instagram had shared specific personal details about the victim violating Section 23 of the POCSO Act, 2012, and Section 74 of Juvenile Justice Act,2015. Hence, the NCPCR has asked Facebook to remove the video put out by Rahul Gandhi on Instagram as it was a deprivation and violation of child rights.

The NCPCR informed Facebook Inc that Section 74 of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 prohibits the disclosure of the identity of a child in any form of media and Section 23 of the POCSO Act, 2012 also stated that no information or photo of a child should be published in any form of media that revealed the identity of the child.

Further, the NCPCR has cited the Supreme Court judgment in the Nipun Saxena vs Govt of India (2019) to suggest that the apex court has issued specific guidelines regarding not disclosing the victims’ details even after their death.

Hence, the child rights body has demanded that Facebook Inc take appropriate action against Rahul Gandhi for violating the POCSO and JJ Act.

On August 4, Rahul Gandhi had visited the minor girl’s family on Wednesday and had tweeted a picture of the parents of the deceased minor girl.

Tweet by Rahul Gandhi

Similarly, he had shared a video on Instagram of his meet with the victim’s family. The victim, a nine-year-old Dalit girl, was allegedly raped, murdered and then allegedly cremated by the alleged perpetrators, who are now in police custody. OpIndia is not linking the post of Rahul Gandhi so as to not compromise the identity of the rape victim.

The four accused have been booked under sections related to rape, murder and threats, and under the POCSO Act and the SC/ST Act provisions.

Twitter removes tweets put out by Rahul Gandhi

The National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) had issued a similar notice to Twitter India seeking action against senior Congress leader Rahul Gandhi for revealing the identity of a nine-year-old girl alleged rape victim.

Complying with the notices of the NCPCR, the micro-blogging site Twitter had taken down Rahul Gandhi’s controversial tweet for revealing the identity of the rape victim.

The tweet does not appear on Rahul Gandhi’s timeline. So when one searches for the tweet on the timeline of Rahul Gandhi, instead of the tweet, Twitter displays a notice saying, “This Tweet is no longer available”.

Rahul Gandhi’s tweet removed

The micro-blogging site Twitter had also informed the Delhi High Court that it had locked the Twitter account of Rahul Gandhi because the senior Congress leader had violated its policy by sharing the pictures of the minor rape victims in a tweet posted by him.

Following Twitter’s action, the Congress party had falsely claimed that Gandhi’s account was temporarily suspended by Twitter, and they were trying to get it restored. However, his account was visible to all that raised questions over the said tweet. Later, Twitter clarified that Rahul Gandhi’s Twitter was not suspended but locked for violating the rules.

After the clarification by Twitter, Congress quoted its previous tweet in which they had alleged Twitter has suspended the account and said it has been “temporarily locked.”

In fact, a complaint was lodged with Delhi Police against the Congress leader for disclosing Delhi’s Nangal rape victim’s identity and thus violating section 23 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 74 of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 228A of Indian Penal Code (IPC).

Maharashtra: School dropout Ibrahim builds a helicopter from scratch, dies after broken rotor blade slashes his throat

0

On Tuesday (August 10) night, a 24-year-old innovator and school dropout named Sheikh Ismail Sheikh Ibrahim succumbed to his injuries during a fatal accident on his DIY helicopter. The incident took place in the Fulsawangi village in Mahagaon tehsil in the Yavatmal district of Maharashtra.

As per reports, Ibrahim had dropped out of school when he was studying in class 8. He then began working with his elder brother Mussavir at his gas welding workshop. He learnt the art of making coolers, almirahs and other household items using steel and aluminium sheets. He was inspired by the character of ‘Rancho’ in the movie ‘3 idiots’ and wanted to make his village Fulsawangi famous. Using the skills that he honed while working at the workshop, Ibrahim designed a helicopter from scratch.

He had built the helicopter using information from Youtube videos. In a mammoth effort that lasted two years, Ibrahim was able to collect all the parts that are required to build the helicopter. According to his friend Sachin Ubale, the deceased innovator created the prototype of a single-seater helicopter. Ibrahim had used steel pipes and a Maruti 800 engine to build the helicopter. Ubale added that Ismail wanted to showcase the DIY helicopter to the public on the occasion of Independence Day.

On Tuesday night, Ismail decided to do a final trial run of the helicopter. As his friends gathered to witness the occasion, he started the engine, and shortly after the accident happen. As seen in the video shot by his friends, while rotating at very high speed, the blades of the tail rotor of the helicopter snapped, and pieces of it hit the main rotor blads. This caused the main rotor blades also to snap, and a piece of metal hit Ismail at a very high speed.

Ismail did not wear protective gear while testing his chopper

“Ismail wanted to exhibit the helicopter to the public on Independence Day this year and so he decided to test the flying machine near his workshop. On Tuesday night, he occupied the pilot seat and started the engine as some of his friends watched in awe. Even before anyone could understand what was happening, a piece of the broken blade slashed Ismail’s throat and he collapsed to the ground. He used to test the functioning of the chopper very often. Earlier, he had been successful in lifting the helicopter 5 feet above the ground. It was his final trial on Tuesday,” Ubale said.

The deceased’s friend informed that Ismail would wear a helmet and headphones while testing the helicopter. However, on the fateful night, he did not wear any protective gear. His friends were thrilled to see Ismail testing out his DIY chopper. Their happiness was short-lived as the helicopter malfunctioned within minutes. After the pieces of the blades slit the throat of Ismail, he fell down from the helicopter. He began bleeding profusely and was rushed to a hospital at Pusad. However, he succumbed to his injuries even before the doctors could begin the treatment. A video of the incident had gone viral on social media.

Ismail wanted to dedicate the chopper under ‘Make in India’ initiative on Independence Day

Ismail was cremated on Wednesday (July 11) amidst a large crowd of villagers. Following the incident, the police took the deceased’s elder brother and 3 friends to the station to the station for further probe. Reportedly, the cops will now seize the helicopter that led to Ismail’s death. According to trader Khurshid Akram and a close acquaintance of the deceased, Ismail had named his vehicle after his nickname ‘Munna.’ He aspired to propose his chopper as a cheaper alternative for rescue operations during floods and for personal use.

Ismail used to say that his chopper would cost only ₹7-8 lac and could be used for various purposes. According to Akram, the deceased wanted to dedicate his DIY project as part of ‘Make in India’ initiative. He had even written the government’s slogan on his chopper. Akram said, “He was apparently in a hurry to launch the helicopter on Independence Day and dedicate it to the nation. I had tried to tell him to make a checklist and inspect everything properly.”

“It seems when he throttled the accelerator, he didn’t have an idea about the tail rotor’s speed, which might have led to the accident. He had got the RPM meter for the main rotor but didn’t have one for the tail rotor,” he added, Ismail is survived by his mother Nazarjaan Bano, father Sheikh Ibrahim, brother Sheikh Mainuddin and sister Saika Bano.

SC lawyer Indira Jaising lies about the law meant to protect minor rape victims to shield Rahul Gandhi: What the law says

Rahul Gandhi’s account was temporarily locked out by Twitter. It later issued a statement on the incident, saying that the action was taken as per the information shared by the National Commission of Women (NCW) according to the guidelines under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.

Social media behemoth Twitter on Wednesday this week informed a Delhi Court that it had locked the Twitter account of Rahul Gandhi because the senior Congress leader had violated its policy by sharing the pictures of the minor rape victim’s family in a tweet posted by him.

Post the locking of the account of Rahul Gandhi, Congress functionaries began to change their pictures to that of Rahul Gandhi and were outraged about Twitter being “biased”. Rahul Gandhi too posted a video rant on YouTube where he alleged that his account had been locked because Twitter was beholden to the Modi government and therefore, it was denying the right to opinion to his 20 million followers.

It was, however, not just Congress workers and Rahul Gandhi himself who started ranting about the Twitter lock. Indira Jaising, a veteran advocate who has always found herself fighting a battle against the interest of the nation specifically, that of Hindus, took to Twitter to lie about the law meant to protect minor victims just to shield the forever-coming-of-age-baby-politician.

Indira Jaising, in an attempt to shield Rahul Gandhi and further his propaganda, said, “We must understand the prohibition against disclosing the identity of a rape victim is to protect the living survivor, that logic does not apply to the dead victim”. Saying so, she tagged Twitter India, Shashi Tharoor and Rahul Gandhi.

She had further said that it makes “no sense” to prohibit publishing a photograph of a “dead rape victim”. She alleged that the prohibition was meant for the living.

What does the law say and how does it prove that Indira Jaising is lying

Indira Jaising, a veteran lawyer who fights for terrorists and urban naxals, completely misrepresented the law to shield Rahul Gandhi from the repercussions of his breaking the law meant to protect minor rape victims.

Indira Jaising made two assertions in her tweets. She said:

  1. The law is meant to protect the identity of the living survivor
  2. If the minor victim dies, then it makes ‘no sense’ for their identity to not be revealed – also insinuating that it was not against the law to begin with

The law, however, is rather clear on this aspect.

Section 74 of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 prohibits the disclosure of identity of a child in any form of media and Section 23 of the POCSO Act, 2012 also states that no information/photo of a child should be published in any form of media which could reveal the identity of the child. This information under Section 23 of the POCSO Act, 2012 includes his/her name, address, photograph, family details, school, neighbourhood or any other particulars which may lead to disclosure of identity of the child.

Section 74 of the JJ Act clearly states that no identifying information of the minor victim can be disclosed. It further says that the Board of Committee, as the case may be, which is holding the inquiry may permit such disclosure if it thinks it is in the interest of the victim. In most cases, it is the District Court Judge.

Section 74 of the Juvenile Justice Act

The POCSO Act is also clear with regards to the disclosure of the identity of a minor victim.

Section 23 of POCSO

Section 23 of the POCSO Act clearly states that no person shall reveal the identity of the child including his name, address, photograph, family details, school, neighbourhood or any other particulars which may lead to the disclosure of the identity of the child.

Both laws have the provision for imprisonment and fine for those who break this law.

In fact, the government had in 2018 clarified that these laws would also apply to victims who were dead.

G Mohanty, media advisor to the NCPCR had said in 2018, “This is an important clarification made by the government as we have seen in many cases that glaring mistakes are made by police and media houses in many cases when it comes to children involved in sensitive cases. It is now clear that their reputation is to be protected even if they are dead.”

The JJ act also says that the violation of the provision can lead to imprisonment of up to six months or fine which may of up to Rs 2 lakh or both.

Speaking to OpIndia, NCPCR chief Priyank Kanoongo said that these laws are in place not just to protect the victim but also the siblings and other living relatives of the brutalised child. If the identity is revealed, it is possible that the other children of the house would be stigmatised and the reputation of the victim and the living relatives would be impugned. Therefore, even if the victim is dead, it is illegal to make any identifying details public. He further said that only District Session Judge can decide if the identity of the minor rape victim should be revealed if it thinks it is in the best interest of the victim. Further, he said that the parents too had no right to waive the law and allow the dissemination of such information.

It is therefore evident that Indira Jaising lied to protect Rahul Gandhi from the repercussions of revealing the identity of the family of the minor rape victim, thereby compromising the victim’s identity as well.

What Twitter had told the court about the locking of Rahul Gandhi’s account

Social media behemoth Twitter had informed the Delhi High Court that it had locked the Twitter account of Rahul Gandhi because the senior Congress leader had violated its policy by sharing the pictures of the minor rape victims in a tweet posted by him. 

During the hearing of the PIL seeking direction to National Commission for Protection of Child Rights and police to take action against the Gandhi scion for his tweet where he allegedly disclosed the identity of Delhi minor rape-murder victim, Twitter said it has removed the said tweet and locked his account.

A PIL has been filed by social activist Makarand Suresh Mhadlekar in Delhi High Court seeking action against Congress leader Rahul Gandhi for disclosing the identity of the 9-year-old rape victim and her family on Twitter.

In the petition, Maharashtra-based social activist Makarand Suresh Mhadlekar alleged that Rahul Gandhi has violated section 74 of the Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 and section 23(2)the Prevention of Children from Sexual Offences Act (POCSO), 2012. Both the provisions mandate that the identity of the child victim of a crime shall not be disclosed. The petition also sought legal action against Rahul Gandhi by the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) for making public the identity of the minor victim. 

Despite Twitter informing the court that they have removed the tweet and locked the account, the petitioner insisted that the social media company should file an affidavit. However, the court rejected that demand, saying that there was no reason why Twitter would be lying. The court said that Twitter has acted responsibly, and there was no reason to disbelieve them. The court posted the matter for hearing on 27 September.