Home Blog Page 5807

Delhi HC dismisses plea filed by Nirbhaya’s murder convict seeking clemency claiming he was juvenile at time of offence

0

The Delhi High Court on Thursday dismissed plea of one of the four convicts, Pawan Kumar Gupta, who had moved to the Delhi High Court yesterday, claiming that he was juvenile at the time of the offence in December 2012 and should be treated under the Juvenile Justice Act.

Justice Suresh Kumar Kait also imposed a penalty of Rs 25K on the convict’s advocate AP Singh, who did not appear in the court despite several communications sent to him on behalf of the court, for playing “hide and seek”. The court also asked Bar Council of Delhi to take action against the advocate for filing a forged affidavit in the court regarding the convict’s age.


Seeking clemency for his crime from the Delhi high court, Gupta, in the plea filed by him, has asserted that his ossification test was not done at that time and he should be granted the benefit of the doubt for it. The petitioner cited the provision of section 7A of Juvenile Justice Act lays down that a claim of juvenility may be taken before any court and it shall be recognised at any stage, even after final disposal of the case.

His petition also refers to him as an “innocent boy” who is “falsely implicated” in the case by “anti-social elements due to revengeful motive” and puts the blame on Delhi Police.

Earlier on Wednesday, the Supreme Court had rejected the review petition filed by one of the death-row convicts, Akshay Kumar Singh, in the Nirbhaya gang-rape case.

Singh, in his petition to SC, had alleged that there has been undue haste for the hanging of the convicts in this case and submitted the list of death-row convicts in other cases who were yet to be hanged.

A 23-year-old paramedic student was brutally gang-raped and cruelly assaulted on the intervening night of December 16-17, 2012 inside a moving bus in Delhi by six people before being thrown out on the road. After battling for her life for 13 days, the victim succumbed to her injuries on 29 December 2012.

Six persons were arrested in the case and following their trial, they were sentenced to the death penalty by the trial and High Court. The apex court in its 2017 verdict had upheld the capital punishment awarded to them by the Delhi High Court and the trial court in the case.

Last year on July 9, the Supreme Court had dismissed the review pleas filed by the other three convicts, Mukesh (30), Pawan Gupta (23) and Vinay Sharma (24) in the case, saying no grounds have been made out by them for review of the 2017 verdict.

Anti-CAA riot in Bengal, an eyewitness account: An announcement, stone pelting, arson and scared passengers trapped in a tin box

So far I had only heard from my grandparents of their agonizing experience of terror while fleeing their homeland in undivided Bengal; I had heard from Kashmiri Hindus of their plight while fleeing the valley for dear life; I had heard how Hindus, persecuted at the hand of the Pakistan Army and their Razakar accomplices in 1971, fled East Pakistan – their home, for countless generations – in order to protect their women. I had also read numerous accounts written by eyewitnesses of the massacre and horror in each of these cases; but today for the first time in my life I got to experience, first-hand, what Jihadi terror unleashed by a mob united in the name of religion entails. The incident unfolded at Akra Railway Station, which is situated on the Sealdah-Budge Budge subsection and comes under the South Section of the Sealdah railways network, one of the two principal nodes of the railway network in the city of Kolkata, the other, being Howrah. This eyewitness account is of the anti-CAA riot that erupted in Bengal.

It was 12:45 PM on the 15th of December, 2019. I was travelling with my wife on the very first compartment of the 12:30 PM up Budge Budge – Sealdah local train, a compartment which shares a wall with the driver’s cabin. We were to get down at Tollyganj, from where we had planned to take a cab to my in-laws’ for a visit to my ailing mother-in-law. It will be pertinent to mention here that only the previous night we had taken another local train in the same route to commute further up in order to attend a relation’s wedding reception party and had returned home late at night using the same means of commuting, on the same route. There was no visible trace of any unrest or anything out of the ordinary at that time.

I have been using this mode of commuting via local trains on the Sealdah-Budge Budge route all my life to attend my school, college, universities and workplaces before moving out of West Bengal for professional reasons. And I cannot recall, at least from my experience of commuting over fifteen years, any significant incident of disruption of train services due to dharnas or protests on this route. Therefore, despite the news of sporadic acts of disruption, violence and even vandalism coming from a few districts and certain specific areas of the city, we took that up Budge Budge – Sealdah local train without a second thought. We also got up into the first compartment considering it’ll be a shorter way to the street outside the station which was our destination.

Read: Muslim mob pelted stones, poked rods, laughed sadistically: Survivor shares harrowing tale from Bengal anti-CAB protests

The train started at about 12:40 PM. It takes about five minutes to reach the Akra station from Nungi, the previous station. The train slowed down considerably just before reaching the platform at Akra. And at that very moment, I heard the blaring noise of loudspeakers from a nearby place of worship of a certain community. It was an announcement, a call – following which the train stopped hard on its tracks just metres away from the said place of worship. This was a mere hundred metres from the platform at Akra. As soon as the train stopped, I noticed hundreds of people running towards the train and the railway tracks. Many of them came roaring from the direction of the place of worship which was on one side of the tracks, while many others came from the dense residential area on the other side.

Restless aggression and a distinct lack of reasonable behaviour – both characteristic features of a fanatic mob – marked them. Most of these fanatics reached for the platform, which houses the ticket counter and the station superintendent’s office. Some remained packed outside the doors of the driver’s cabin on either side of the train. That meant our compartment too got surrounded by a small crowd, which consisted of boys aged between 10 to 15 years and young men – all armed with stones picked from the railway tracks. They were yelling, hurling abuses and making wild, gleeful noises. I could see the smiling faces of the boys and the shockingly bright colours of their hair dye from one corner of a windowpane that wouldn’t get shut.

It seemed to me that they had come to witness some sort of violent, barbaric tribal carnival. It was a celebration of violence for them, a thoughtless unleashing of the animal instincts dormant in humans, instincts which are kept suppressed by layers of culture and civilisation. Bereft of these valuable possessions, the constituent members of the present mob showcased the baser qualities of the human species, true to the characteristics of fanatically monotheistic cults which have razed to the ground the great monuments of our overwhelmingly polytheistic, poly-ethnic Indic civilisation.

Read: The Owaisi Factor: Why Mamata Banerjee went soft on the raging Muslim mobs in Bengal risking Hindu consolidation for the BJP

Panicked, the passengers in our compartment started trying to shut the window panes and doors. Some jumped off the compartment and onto the tracks and started running in the opposite direction. I was warily looking out one window to take stock of the situation. I could see an overcrowded platform in the distance, and I could hear wild roars rising one after another from that direction. Coming back to my seat, I tried connecting with the helpline of the GRP, but to no avail. I immediately called home, briefed them about the situation we’d found ourselves in and asked them to contact the local police station or GRP, whichever they could connect to. The Akra station area fell under the same police station’s jurisdiction as my family residence.

I got a call from home within minutes. They’d managed to connect with a GRP number. I noted the same and dialled it. Upon connecting, I narrated the situation in a manner so as to convey the gravity of the matter and impress upon the personnel the fact that the situation already seems to have gone out of control and the lives of countless innocent passengers were at stake. The response I received was crisp and by no means assuring: “We got the news. We will see.” I had a feeling that the personnel had failed to grasp the seriousness of the matter. So I gave it another try – telling him how helpless we felt as passengers caught in an unanticipated crisis, having no way for escape; that there were women and children among the passengers and how unsafe it seemed to even get off the train, considering those waiting outside seemed unfriendly, to say the least. The response was constant: we know it, we’ll see. To hear that forces had been dispatched for rescuing the passengers or to disperse the mob would have been highly assuring in this situation. At that moment, I felt utterly helpless.

By then the crowd outside had started banging wildly on the walls and tightly shut doors and windows of our compartment. Some of the passengers started discussing whether it would be wiser to remain shut inside or try to seek the assistance of those outside, in escaping from the scene. I myself felt clueless as to our next course of action. I sought my wife’s opinion, as well as that of my parents back at home via phone calls. Both urged me to stay inside the compartment and wait. I felt like we were waiting for our end to greet us. I remembered my Lord’s name as I muttered: “Jai Sri Ram, Jai Bajrang Bali”.

Read: BJP’s Kailash Vijayvargiya shares videos of being surrounded by Muslim mob, says WB government showed no concerns to his safety

They started pelting rocks at the compartment. The noise of the rocks hitting the metal walls, doors and windowpanes of the train compartment was terrible. The end seemed near. To put things into perspective: even a small chip of the basalt rocks which are usually strewn on the railway tracks, if thrown with sufficient force, can cause a life-threatening injury. What of the large rocks then, each one of which weighs about two to three kilos! Such rocks were being incessantly pelted at the driver’s cabin with vengeance, many of which struck the walls, doors and windows of the compartment we were in, for, remember, it was the very first compartment of the train. Every one of us in the compartment got down on all fours, desperately trying to shield our heads, ducked beneath the seats for cover. Any number of those pelted rocks could have mortally struck the passengers. Thank God they didn’t – or at least they didn’t strike anyone within the range of my vision. Apart from children and young men and women, there were a few senior citizens among the passengers in that compartment, about forty passengers in all. I couldn’t keep track of the time during which the stone-pelting continued full-on. Perhaps at moments of such grave crisis, when humans fear for their lives and the lives of their near ones, the sense of time gets blurred. It could have been two to three minutes or perhaps much more than that. But the duration did seem to me like an eternity. And I couldn’t think of a way out of this plight.

At one point, the intensity of the shower of rocks softened a bit, and as soon as it lowered one of the compartment doors were thrown open; and some four-five men got up into the compartment. Wearing a seemingly casual attitude, they straightaway asked us, passengers, to get off the compartment. We hesitated. How could we trust these men, who may well have been a part of the mob pelting rocks at our compartment a moment ago? We would be left with no choice but retreat following the railway tracks on foot, and walk all the way back to the previous station (which was situated at a distance of about eight km from that place) if we detrained now. And what was the guarantee that we won’t be harmed by the same mob once we detrain? The question of advancing towards the platform on foot doesn’t even arise. The beastly roars from the direction of the platform had trebled by now, and as I put my head out of the now-open door I spotted pitch dark clouds of smoke rising from numerous points on the railway tracks and the platforms ahead. The station had been put on fire. The unrestrained mob was on a rampage.

Meanwhile, these men who had broken into our compartment kept directing us to get off. I had a suspicion that they were planning some mischief either with the carriages, or with the passengers, or with both. Perhaps they wanted to avoid serious trouble for themselves by putting the carriages on fire while the passengers were inside and thus wanted us to vacate them. This seemed more credible to me as they were insisting on us getting off the compartment as the stone-pelting continued, albeit with somewhat lower intensity. Or they might have humbler intentions to simply loot the electrical appliances and metal fixings from the compartment after we had vacated the place. It occurred to me that they might get mad at us passengers if we didn’t detrain as they suggested, and consequently, they’d want to remove this one obstacle on their path by harming us. And so, with Sri Ram’s name on my lips, I decided to get off.

Read: Citizenship Amendment Act protests: Muslim mob continues rampage in Bengal, three more Railway stations and toll plazas set ablaze

But then I remembered the senior citizens among the passengers. I looked at them. They appeared to be petrified, fixed to their seats out of sheer terror. Addressing the men directing us to get off the compartment, I pleaded with them: “Dada, we can try jumping off the compartment from this height as we are young; but please think of these old women and men – how will they manage this feat? It’s impossible for them!” Those men acted as if my words didn’t penetrate their ears. They kept on repeating one phrase: Get off! Get off!

As I prepared to get off, I saw another group of young men standing outside our compartment on the railway tracks beside the train, laughing and cracking jokes amongst themselves, and making those meaningless, primitive, gleeful noises through their parted human lips, while capturing our ordeal on their mobile phone cameras all this time. The gap between the pedestal at the compartment door and the landing below – which was nothing but rocks strewn on an uneven bed between railway tracks – was at least seven feet. This is no exaggeration, considering the train was far from entering the platform area, which was still about a hundred metres away. Attempting a jump from this altitude and onto such terrain might throw even an athletic young man off balance, resulting in some serious injury. Add to that the fear of getting struck by the rocks being hurled from time to time, amidst roars of beastly cheering and laughter, and the dark clouds of smoke rising skyward from the conflagrations up ahead. I could my hear my own heart pounding wildly as I jumped off the pedestal and landed on the tracks. The terror was compounded as the concern for my wife’s safety was gnawing at me.

I helped my wife get down and together we stepped off the railway tracks onto a parallel muddy path. As we did so, another spell of terrifying roars reached my ears and I saw a hundred men running towards us from the direction of the station. For a few seconds, we were transfixed to the ground. We were fearing the worst in those passing moments. Those momentary fears got quelled when I realised that the men were headed not toward us, but past us. It surprised me when I noticed that even this mob, which was rioting on the platforms at the station, consisted mainly of teenage boys and young men, almost all of whom would be aged 10 to 20 years old. The two of us joined them and ran, not knowing where we were headed. While running, I caught up with one of these boys and asked him why they were fleeing. He said the RAF had been deployed at the station, that’s why.

This piece of information made me heave a sigh of relief. But the very next moment a thought occurred to me: what if the angry mob, incensed at the actions taken by the RAF, decided to take it all out on us? Also, if the RAF fires tear gas shells at this mob, even we might get caught in the crossfire. Lacking a better plan, we started running towards the residential area on the opposite side of the place of worship mentioned earlier. After minutes of running, we reached a narrow lane where some curious local women were trying to see what’s going on. Upon enquiry, they told us that we could reach the Budge Budge Trunk Road (the principal connecting roadway between the suburbs and the city proper) if we walked on for around fifteen minutes via the Akra Station Road.

The narrow lane consisted of a swampy, muddy path and it also had open drainage on one side, which made it all the more difficult to walk through it. And we were forced to run through the same! After traversing myriads of such narrow lanes – an attempt which felt like finding one’s way out of a maze – we could finally see a glimpse of the Akra Station Road through a small gap between two houses situated on one of the lanes. This was the road that connected the Akra station and the Budge Budge Trunk Road, ending into the latter at a juncture known as the Dakghar More. And this road now seemed to be our best bet to escape the rioting mob. We also noticed a number of motorcycle riders from the Akra Station Road trying to get through the small gap to the lanes. Must be the fear of the patrolling RAF.

Read: From enjoying mustard field to discussing UK elections: How five-star “journalists” looked away as Muslim mobs burnt Bengal

My wife and I were standing at one end of that lane, accompanied by three-four passengers from the train who, like us, were desperately trying to reach Dakghar More. The scene in the lanes brought an image in my head: that of a rat trap, and at that moment the indignity of our situation as Hindus living in this state, in this country, hit me. Nobody except we were to be blamed for what was happening to us today. The lack of self-awareness about our position in this subcontinent’s history, the lack of willingness to organise as a nation, a self-effacing attitude and the resultant apathy for the present and the future were to be blamed. In this scenario, finding faults with other communities would be a mere escapist stance. Others are only working towards fulfilling their respective religious and communal goals. They have fixed goals. And what about us, the Hindus? Far from having a fixed goal, we were determined to resist any attempt to work out a common goal.

A few more tensed moments passed. Then we saw that the motorcyclists were fleeing the scene, taking whatever route they could find. We saw a small company of RAF walking past the narrow gap of the lane. Evidently, the bullies on motorcycles were now busy saving their own necks. My wife and I decided that we must risk taking the station road in order to reach Dakghar More on foot. We approached the road, advancing carefully through the lane. The other passengers accompanied us. The houses on either side seemed deserted except for the women – were the men and kids out rioting?

Reaching the end of the lane, I stuck my neck out to check what was happening on either direction on the road. On my left, the road had ended at the station; there was nothing to be seen except for flames and dark clouds of smoke constantly rising from them. On my right were some people, scattered here and there on the road. They wore expressions of curiosity and tension. I saw some young men standing on top of a huge four-storey house, recording the scenes of destruction and rioting down below. They appeared to be really enjoying their activities on what seemed to be just another leisurely winter afternoon for them. They were jocular and curious, and in them, there was no trace of the terror that had engulfed us.

Read: Journalist explains how the Bengali elite justified Muslim mob violence and paved the way for the downfall of Bengal

We hit the station road. The road seemed deserted after the patrolling RAF had passed through it. Some local men were trying to test the waters before assembling again. We carefully avoided them and walked along. They were abusive, roaring from time to time and had an aggressive body language. But not one of them dared to advance towards us. Such was the fear instilled in them by the patrolling RAF. It was clear that they were awaiting a chance to get back to the station and resume vandalising and arson. Perhaps one spell of rioting could not satiate them. Advancing further, we saw a bus standing across the road. It had been vandalised, its windscreen and windows bearing the marks of stone-pelting.

With anxieties and uncertainties of all sorts in our hearts, we continued walking down the station road. After several minutes of walking, we reached a neighbourhood where there was hardly any minority household. The air seemed less troubled, and there was no trace of vandalism or violence anywhere. People sneaked out of their windows and doors to understand what was going on outside. I asked one of them if we would get any conveyance from Dakghar More. The response wasn’t satisfactory. We walked on for five or seven minutes more. Finally, we reached the junction on the Budge Budge Trunk Road. It had little resemblance with what I remembered of it from my last visit during the Durga Puja just two months ago. Obscured by smoke, littered with burnt remain of tyres and logs, it resembled an abandoned war zone. It was clear that the mobs had unleashed utter destruction here as well. There was no sign of buses, autos or cabs. After a rather long wait, we saw an e-rickshaw. We stuffed ourselves into it, along with three more passengers from the train.

Ever since we reached our home, we have been haunted by the nightmarish memories of that incident. The things that had happened to us on that day, and the things that could have happened to us – reflections of these sorts kept conjuring horrible images inside our heads, even when we were wide awake. I believe it was through sheer grace of God that we had managed to escape from the fanatic mob in one piece. But this incident had once more exposed the widespread apathy of the Hindu fold towards protecting its dignity, lives, culture, property and dharma, and the consequent unpreparedness to meet the monstrous challenges it faces at this juncture in history.

(The Bengali version of the article was first published in Bangodesh)

Mumbai: Teenage schoolboys of top-ranked IB school talk about ‘raping’, ‘gang-banging’ classmates on WhatsApp, get suspended

As per a report in Mumbai Mirror, eight teenage boys studying in a posh, top-ranked IB (International Baccalaureate) school in Mumbai have been suspended after they were caught sharing violent and sexually explicit remarks about their female classmates over Whatsapp.

The action was taken by the school authorities after the mothers of two girl students gained access to the WhatsApp chats and brought it to the school authorities’ notice. Interestingly, this high profile school mostly accommodates children belonging to celebrities or high profile businessmen or diplomats.

All the boys, reportedly aged 13 to 14, in their WhatsApp conversation which lasted from November 8 to November 30, have allegedly used horrifying remarks against their female batchmates. As per a report in Mumbai Mirror, the chat, transcripts of which run into over a hundred pages, is peppered with terms like ‘gang bang’ and ‘rape’, calling girls ‘trash’, and has the eight boys body shaming their classmates and also referring to them as gays and lesbians.

The matter came to light when the two mothers, “celebrities in their own right”, got their hands on the contents of the chat after their girls refused to go to school saying they were too scared.

In one conversation on November 23, the boys spoke about their preferences for a bunch of girls from their class “for a one-night stand”. Likewise, in one other conversation a boy, referring to one of his classmates, says: “Then one night we just go and bang her.” He later uses the term “gang bang”, while referring to the girl, which elicits a cheer from a friend, who replies, “Ye.”

These boys used several homophobic slurs and violent language, like “I’ll destroy that little bi**h” and “should I go full-on and kill her existence”. These conversations centred around two girl students.

Their WhatsApp conversations were posted on a group of which parents of all the students of that class are members. Some of the chats had later been leaked outside. One parent reportedly said that the school is best suited to take whatever action it deems appropriate against the boys and it is unlikely that the police will be approached.

Though few parents with whom Mumbai Mirror, a Mumbai based daily, got in touch with, confirmed the controversy and the suspensions, the school declined to comment despite repeated attempts by the newspaper.

Jamia riots: Lawyers of petitioners shout ‘shame shame’ as Delhi Court refuses to grant interim relief to rioters

0

Hearing petitions requesting the formation of a judicial commission to investigate the violence at the Jamia Millia Islamia on Sunday, the Delhi High Court bench comprising of Chief Justice DN Patel and Justice C Hari Shankar, today refused to provide any interim protection to student rioters from any coercive action, including arrest by Delhi Police.

The court also issued a notice to the Centre, the Delhi government and the police, asking them to file a response on a plea over Jamia Milia University incident. The court posts the matter for further hearing on February 4.

As the Delhi HC turned down the petition for protection to Jamia rioters and refuse to set the next hearing at an earlier date, the situation in the courtroom took an unprecedented turn and the lawyers representing the petitioners started hooting the judges by shouting ‘shame shame’.


Dissatisfied by the High Court judgement, the lawyers’ lobby reportedly started shouting ‘shame on you’ at the judges.

The court’s decision came while hearing six petitions seeking medical treatment and compensation for injured students in the protests against CAA over the past few days.

Earlier, the Supreme Court had directed that all petitions on the issue be taken to the concerned High Courts, which may then take a call whether an independent enquiry committee may be set up to probe the issue.

Read: Jamia riots: Supreme Court dismisses pleas against police action, directs the petitioners to approach respective HCs

Delhi witnessed violent scenes on Sunday when several buses, motor-bikes and private vehicles were set ablaze during anti-CAA riots near south Delhi’s Jamia Nagar area. The Delhi police in a bid to control the frenzied mob, later entered the Jamia campus and fired tear gas shells, baton-charged and detained several rioters.

The rioters had torched four public buses and two police vehicles in the clash, leaving six cops and two firemen injured. A students’ body later said they had nothing to do with the violence and arson and alleged that “certain elements” had joined in and “disrupted” the demonstration.

Delhi Police also rubbished the rumours that bullets were fired by the police personnel on the protestors when the agitation turned ugly. It also claimed that the 10 people arrested by the police for the acts of arson and vandalism during the protests did not belong to the Jamia Millia Islamia University and were outsiders.

Violence erupts during 19th Dec protests: Here is why imposition of section 144 was necessary during Anti-CAA protest

While the ‘liberals’ may well tell you India is no longer a democracy and we are under rule of a dictator, fortunately it is not so. One could list many reasons but to begin with one could say that you can call the prime minister of our country a dictator and equate him to Adolf Hitler and get away with it should be good enough reason to say that democracy and your freedom of speech and expression is still alive and kicking.

In wake of the protest calls, the administration of various cities and districts had imposed section 144 of the Indian Penal Code which prohibits assembly of four or more people. The pre-emptive step was taken to ensure that things don’t get out of hand and violence doesn’t break out. Many ‘liberals’ thought this is clamping down freedom of expression and the right to protest.

Questioning imposition of section 144

Abusive troll thought imposing section 144 as a preventive measure is ‘unimaginable’.


Congress President Sonia Gandhi’s son in law Robert Vadra’s relative was also questioning imposition of section 144.


Oh, and Bengaluru. Since 144 was imposed from 6 am today, the ‘peaceful protestors’ wanted to start their protests at midnight because how will then ‘Amit Shah stop us’.


While some were celebrating ‘defying’ of section 144 when they saw scores of people gather for ‘peaceful’ demonstration.


However, since they questioned imposing 144 and celebrated when the mob broke the law, here is a ready reckoner for them as to why imposition of section 144 was necessary.

The buildup

These violent protests weren’t spontaneous and there was a buildup to it. Earlier this week, following the riots in New Delhi’s Jamia Nagar where Jamia Millia Islamia university is located, a Muslim mob went on a rampage in New Delhi’s Seelampur and even attacked a school bus. Communal slogans like ‘Hinduon se azaadi (freedom from Hindus)’ were raised in Jamia Nagar.

Then a nation-wide protests were announced on 19th December. OpIndia investigation revealed how Congress had co-ordinated these protests and how there is a much more sinister plot to it.

December 19

The visuals coming in today show how the fears of violence escalating were not unfounded. In Gujarat’s Palanpur, a Muslim mob attacked a police van. These protests were led by Gujarat’s Vadgam MLA Jignesh Mevani.


In Uttar Pradesh’s Sambhal, ‘protestors’ torched a bus.


Uttar Pradesh is the state where section 144 is imposed across the state and the ‘liberals’ were crying themselves hoarse on Twitter that this is clamping down of democracy.


Just some buses being set on fire by ‘peaceful protestors’. No big deal.

A police chowki was burnt down in Lucknow.


Uttar Pradesh is the worst affected despite section 144 in place.

A media OB van was also set on fire in Lucknow’s Hazratganj.


Now, tell us again, why the administration should not have imposed section 144 to control the unruly mob running riots?

Media tried to ‘manufacture consent’ about the authenticity of anti-CAA protests: Here is how students foiled that attempt

Protests erupted against the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) in liberal enclaves within a select few Universities in India. It was apparent from the very beginning that the campaign did not have widespread support even within the campuses of the said Universities. However, with the help of a pliant media, the campaign was hyped up to create the pretence of a widespread students’ movement across the country.

We witnessed the manner in which the alumni of different Universities launched a counter-campaign to bust the narrative that students were by and large against the government’s initiative. The alumni at IIMA, in response to an earlier statement by leftists and liberals from the University, endorsed the Citizenship Amendment Act and the National Registrar of Citizens.

“While the media reported IIMA as being against NRC in an almost a blanket stereotyping of all students, members and alums, there are many, many who support and understand the need for NRC. These voices deserve a place and space to be heard on an equal platform, and it is no justice for them to be clubbed as Anti-NRC just because some of their peers signed a letter,” a letter in circulation said.

Read: Khilafat 2.0: How Useful Idiots in the media and political parties were fooled by Jamia students associated with the ‘blood brother’ of a banned Radical Islamic outfit

In a similar vein, leftists at IIT-Bombay issued a statement that gave one the impression that the entire institution was against the CAA and NRC when it was evidently not true. As a consequence of that, the silent majority of IIT-B spurred into action and launched a counter-campaign to declare their support for the said initiatives. In Delhi University as well, students came out in large numbers to support the CAA.

As it turns, the counter-protest in support of the CAA has spread to other Universities. Leftists at the Dr Ram Manohar Lohiya National Law University, Lucknow, issued a ‘statement of solidarity with the students of Jamia Milia Islamia & AMU’. The statement was “in light of the continuing police brutality to curb their peaceful protest”. It was alleged that the Police went to the extent of “brutalizing students under the garb of maintaining law and order”. The statement was signed by various committees of the institution, thus, giving the impression that it did have the explicit consent of major sections of the student community.

RMNLU statement

However, as it turns out, there was no consensus even within the committees, let alone the wider sections of the student community. Rahul Chaudhary, the national media convenor of the ABVP who happens to be a student at NLU-Lucknow, said that there was significant disagreement even within the said committees who did not agree with the public statement made at all. He told us that a select few individuals assumed the authority without ever being awarded the same and then proceeded to release the statement on behalf of everyone without the consent of those around them. He told us that students were particularly offended by the fact that the statement appeared to convey their opinions as well when clearly they did not endorse the sentiments expressed through it.

Read: When anti-CAA protesters claim architects of Moplah massacre as ‘freedom fighters’, it’s clear that they want “Hinduon Se Azadi”

OpIndia has also accessed a Facebook post in a closed group that shows the discontent that was brewing following the release of the statement. The individual who made the abovementioned Facebook post said, “I know many people including me who are part of one of the committees and they do not adhere to the same.” Thus, as a consequence, a second statement was issued in response to the previous one by the students of the said institution. And the contrast between the two statements could not be starker.

In the revised statement, the students acknowledge that it’s still unclear whether the protesters from Jamia and AMU resorted to violence or not. It also condemns unequivocally the incidents of rioting and mob violence by the protesters. At the same time, it expresses gratitude towards the Policemen in charge of law and order. But, it also urges the Police to “respond to instances of violence with due regard to the principle of proportionality.” It also urges citizens to “be careful that we do not unwittingly become channels of misinformation and polarization”. It concludes with the hope that “peace is restored and constitutional values are upheld”.

Statement of RMLNU

Not once did the statement express any solidarity with the protesters of Jamia and AMU and neither did it condemn the Police entirely, that is the biggest takeaway from the revised statement. Furthermore, the statement clearly acknowledges that the said committees are unelected. Most importantly, it acknowledges that “they do not seek to present the statement of solidarity as the position of the entire student body but merely a part of it” and “It shouldn’t be taken as everyone’s voice”. Thus, another deceitful attempt to present the Leftist stance on the protests as the normative opinion of the student community failed spectacularly.

Read: After Jamia, AMU students attempt riots, UP Police to evacuate campus

An even more brutal retaliation came from the Alumni of the National University of Juridical Sciences, Kolkata (NUJS, Kolkata). The Alumni voiced their unequivocal support for the Citizenship Amendment Act and condemned the mob violence that erupted across the country in the wake of it. They also expressed their gratitude towards Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah for the passage of the Bill.

Their statement said, “We believe that the enactment of the CAA is by no means anti any particular community specifically Muslims and is founded on an intelligible differentia under Article 14 of the Constitution of India having a reasonable nexus with the objective it wishes to achieve i.e. protecting life and liberty of oppressed minorities from three neighbouring nations.”

NUJS students and alumni issue statement

The statement also said, “We are appalled by the logic fronted by those in opposition to the CAA. Though they submit that persecuted minorities must be protected, yet their solidarity extends to only one particular community and not for persecuted Hindus, Sikhs, Jains, Buddhists, Parsis and Christians which the CAA aims to protect and harbour. India has in the past opened its doors to Tibetans and Jews. Their fears against NRC are also premature and conjectural.” In a damning indictment, the statement said, “We appeal to the cynics and pathological naysayers to uphold their democratic right to protest and not misuse their freedoms.”

Thus, quite clearly, the ‘movement’ of ‘students’ that is being hyped by the media is facing the strongest resistance from students themselves. Amit Shah, during a recent interview, mentioned that the protests in Universities were not as widespread as it is touted to be and only occurring within a select few institutions. Even so, it appears that within these institutions themselves, the students do not enjoy widespread support as they want others to believe. Thus, liberals and leftists have been forced to engage in deceit in order to feign an aura of popular support.

Read: Allah has given us the right to Jihad, Amit Shah is playing with fire: Maulana incites Muslims to take up arms against govt of India

With the help of the media, a narrative has been created that widespread sections of the ‘student community’ were against the CAA when, in reality, there is no evidence to suggest the same. Furthermore, OpIndia has exposed the manner in which the students’ wing of the Congress party has been attempting to instigate protests across Universities in an obvious bid to garner political mileage from the resultant protests. However, they are facing stiff resistance from students themselves who are coming out in droves in support of the CAA.

The entire charade of the protests by Leftists and Liberals with help from a pliant media reminds one of the famous book by Noam Chomsky and Edward S. Herman: Manufacturing Consent. The book posited that mass media outlets “are effective and powerful ideological institutions that carry out a system-supportive propaganda function, by reliance on market forces, internalized assumptions, and self-censorship, and without overt coercion”. In simple words, the media peddles dedicated propaganda in order to create an impression of consent among people. When the public buys into the media narrative, they believe that what they are being told is genuine and choose not to question it. Even if they have personal disagreements, they resist airing their opinions for fear of public disapproval and social ostracization.

In this particular instance, the mainstream media has attempted to ‘manufacture consent’ regarding the authenticity of the so-called movement by students. In reality, no such movement exists on the ground and the ongoing protests are appropriately described as one by liberals and leftists, not students. By portraying it to be as one by students, the mainstream media is attempting to propagandize a students’ movement against the CAA into existence. However, their attempts are being foiled by the silent majority which has finally decided to raise its voice.

USA honours Indian democracy, support protection of minority rights all over the world: US Sec of State Mike Pompeo

0

US secretary of state Mike Pompeo has stated that the USA honours Indian democracy as India has a robust debate inside the country on issues like citizenship and religious freedom.

As per reports, Pompeo was asked a question regarding the protests in India after the passage of the CAA.


“We care deeply and always will about protecting minorities and religious rights everywhere. We honour Indian democracy as they have a robust debate on the issue that you raised,” said Mike Pompeo, United States Secretary of State at a news conference at the conclusion of the 2+2 ministerial talks.

On Wednesday Secretary Mike Pompeo and US Defense Secretary Mark Esper hosted their Indian counterparts External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar and Defense Minister Rajnath Singh for the talks.

The top American diplomat expressed his respect to India’s democratic ethos and the concerns for the protection of rights of religious minorities all over the world.

Mike Pompeo also reiterated that the United States has been consistent in the way that it has responded to these issues, not only in India but all across the world.

S Jaishankar, Minister of External Affairs also responded on the issue, said, “The question that you asked relating to India, if you had followed the debate on that particular legislation carefully, you would see that it is a measure which is designed to address the needs of persecuted religious minorities from certain countries.”

He added, “If you look at what those countries are and therefore what their minorities are, perhaps you understand why certain religions were identified in terms of characterising those who had come across,” Jaishankar said.

The 2+2 dialogue is the second-highest level of engagement between both countries after summit-level engagement between the Prime Minister and the US President. It was agreed between both during the visit of Prime Minister Narendra Modi to the US in June 2017.

Read: Khilafat 2.0: How Useful Idiots in the media and political parties were fooled by Jamia students associated with the ‘blood brother’ of a banned Radical Islamic outfit

The defence and foreign secretaries of the United States hold meetings with their Indian counterparts to enhance strategic coordination between both countries and maintaining peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific region. The 2+2 dialogue puts strategic, defence and security relationship between two countries at the forefront and centre stage. It replaced earlier India-US Strategic and Commercial Dialogue.

Watch: Muslim mob in Gujarat’s Palanpur where MLA Jignesh Mevani led protests goes violent, attacks police van

A Muslim mob protesting against the Citizenship Amendment Act went violent in Jignesh Mevani’s Vadgam constituency and blocked the Chhapi-Palanpur highway. The mob soon turned violent and they attacked a police van and shook the van in one of the most terrifying visuals.


This is the same place where Gujarat MLA Jignesh Mevani was leading the protests. He had even referred to this hooliganism as ‘way to go’.


In the first video, one can see the incident took place outside one ‘Taj sweets and bakers’.

Taj Sweets and Bakers in video where Muslim mob is attacking a police van.

One can also spot ‘Anti-CAA’ placards thereby proving the video is of current protests and not an older video. In a video shared by Gujarat Vadgam MLA Jignesh Mevani, at around 18 seconds, same ‘Taj sweets and bakers’ can be spotted.

Taj sweets and bakers in video shared by Jignesh Mevani

It is a video of the same place and same mob which attacked a police van of which Mevani is proud of.

In anticipation of nation-wide protests, various city and district administrations and imposed section 144 in many parts of the country. However, as is evident, many violated the law and took law into their own hands and attacked police under the garb of ‘peaceful protests’.

Allah has given us the right to Jihad, Amit Shah is playing with fire: Maulana incites Muslims to take up arms against govt of India

An Islamist youtube channel named MK Islamic channel has recently uploaded a repugnant speech by one Maulana Jarjis Ansari Hafizullah who during the entire course of his speech is heard on several occasions passing derogatory remarks against India’s PM Narendra Modi and HM Amit Shah, threatening to wage ‘jihad’ in India as he rejects to accept the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) and National Register of Citizens (NRC) bill by falsely claiming that they are anti-Muslim.

The video was uploaded on December 18. It has over 4 lakh views till now. The MK Islamic YouTube channel shows it was created in October this year. Its videos, many featuring the same Maulana, have registered over 27 lakh views on the 13 videos it has shared till now.

The Maulana in his hate speech audaciously says that if Modi or Shah try to throw them (referring to the Muslim community) out of the country he would take ‘jihad’ to the last corner of India. He is heard saying “inke baap ke baap ke baap ki bhi takat nahi hain ki humme bahar nikaal de (their forefathers also do not have the gall to throw us out of the nation), humme nikaal ke toh dikha Modi, hum bhi jihad karne se peeche nahi hatengein (try throwing us out Modi, we will also not hesitate in waging jihad)”.

Though the government has clarified repeatedly that CAA does not concern Indian Muslims at all, the Maulana spreads falsehood amongst his listeners by saying that the government wants to throw out all Muslims from the country.

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dd_mKY2Cqv8]

He audaciously abuses the Prime Minister by using words like ‘anpadh’ (uneducated) and ‘napunsak’ (impotent) for him, while referring to the Home Minister as “mote” (fat) and “takle” (bald). He threatens the Home Minister by saying “tum aag se khel rahe ho (you are playing with fire), do not under-estimate us”. He also praised Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal, saying it was Kejriwal who had shown him PM Modi’s educational qualifications.

In the middle of his hate speech, the Maulana is heard claiming that the rioters who had burnt down the deputy CM’s headquarters in Assam and gheraoed the chief minister’s residence were no one else but people of his community. He says: that the entire panic created in Assam by the Muslims was just a teaser, do not compel us to create a similar situation in the entire country.

Moreover, at around 3 minutes 30 seconds into his hate speech, the Maulana unblushingly threatens the government to either withdraw CAA and NRC or be prepared for ‘jihad’. He is heard saying: agar yeh kanoon par tum atal rahe to itna yaad rakhna ki maarne aur marne se koi nahi chuke ga (if you are hellbent on implementing these laws in India then remember we will also not refrain from killing others or giving our lives)”, said the Maulana.

The anti-CAA Muslim mob has been on a rampage in various parts of the country since the Citizenship Act was brought in by the Modi government. While several Pakistani Hindu migrants across the country have been celebrating and lauding the passing of the historic Citizenship Amendment Act, which has brought their lost hope back, Muslim mobs had gone on a rampage, destroying public property and creating chaos.

Read: Citizenship Amendment Act protests: Muslim mob continues rampage in Bengal, three more Railway stations and toll plazas set ablaze

In state’s like West Bengal, the Muslim mobs have resorted to extreme violence by blocking train tracks, burning down railway stations, trains and buses, pelting stones, vandalism and loot.

However, Home Minister Amit Shah has time and again restated the government’s strong willingness to implement CAA and NRC in the country and has established that the law will not be withdrawn under any circumstances.

Here is why the challenges to Citizenship Amendment Act will likely get laughed out of the Supreme Court

Over the last few weeks, you must have heard over and over again the refrain: How can the government discriminate between people on the basis of religion? Doesn’t this make the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) unconstitutional and likely to be struck down by the Supreme Court? And you might agree with that, especially if you are influenced by Bollywood thought leaders who have googled pictures of the Constitution for the first time in their lives.

Let me explain why all so-called legal challenges to this legislation are probably going to get laughed out of the Supreme Court.

So let’s talk about the law. We have all heard of Articles 14 and 15 in the Constitution of India, which expressly forbid the government of India from discriminating between people on grounds such as sex, caste, religion, etc. This is enshrined in our Fundamental Rights, incorporated in Part III of the Constitution.

But we also know from our everyday knowledge that this is hardly the case in India. To give you a simple example, it was only the other day that Delhi announced free travel for women in all public buses. More serious examples would include of course reservations based on caste or economic criteria. Then, there is, of course, the Ministry of Minority Affairs, which gives everything from scholarships to job training to religious minorities.

Read: Who is instigating violence in colleges: Congress, NSUI, a sinister WhatsApp group and anti-CAA protests

Generally speaking, welfare measures for weaker sections, outlined on lines of caste, religion or gender are completely routine in India. All Indians are very familiar with this concept.

But what is the constitutional basis for this? How might the government make exceptions to “equal treatment for all”?

The answer lies in something called “reasonable classification,” based on the even more fancy-sounding term called “intelligible differentia.” The meanings of these terms have been explained by the Supreme Court in the landmark R K Dalmia vs SR Tendolkar case (1958).

Simply put, government action must meet two criteria :

(1) First, there must be a clear distinction between a group and members who are not in that group.

Here, the group in question is members of six religions (Hindu, Sikh, Jain, Buddhist, Parsi and Christian) who are refugees from three Islamic countries which border India (Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangladesh).

(2) Second, the government action should meet the objectives for picking up that group.

Here, the group members face religious persecution in these declared Islamic countries. Since they have nowhere else to go, this Act grants them citizenship of India.

Read: Citizenship Amendment Bill – Myths and lies propagated against it, and the facts

Notice that both criteria are extremely important. For example, women could be clearly defined group. That meets criterion (1). Suppose the government were to pass a law tomorrow that entitles every woman to free Mickey Mouse stickers. This would be illegal because it would fail criterion (2): because the action of providing Mickey Mouse stickers does not meet the objective of women’s empowerment in any reasonable way.

But you can see how neatly the Citizenship Amendment Bill would pass both criteria (1) and (2). The Act clearly identifies a group and then take actions that will provide targeted relief to them.

But there’s more!

In case you have some lingering doubts, here is the icing on the cake.

The Supreme Court not only allows the government to make reasonable classifications, but it also creates a presumption in *favour* of the government in all legal challenges to it.

In other words, if you were to challenge the CAA in the court, the entire burden of proof would be on you to prove your case. The Court will always start with the assumption that the law passed by the legislature is constitutional and correctly understands the will of the people.

There you go. For those who hope to challenge the CAA in the court, it’s all but over.

Now you know what’s really happening. The liberals know they lost in the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha. They know they are bound to lose in the Supreme Court.

Read: Khilafat 2.0: How Useful Idiots in the media and political parties were fooled by Jamia students associated with the ‘blood brother’ of a banned Radical Islamic outfit

And that’s why liberals know that the only way open to them is to physically intimidate the government and the majority community by stone-pelting on school buses and burning trains. That is why you have all these liberals morally supporting the riots, spreading fake news, signing foolish petitions and frantically calling up media contacts across the world. Because they know their legal case is both unjust and hopeless.

Their only move is to intimidate the government at home and defame India abroad.  The one thing they don’t want is people understanding the act and what it does. Instead of reading their Instagram posts, let’s read our Constitution and Supreme Court judgments. It will foil their plans.