Home Blog Page 3230

Freudian slip of the century: Former US President George Bush says invasion of Iraq was wholly unjustified, ‘corrects’ it to Ukraine a second later

Former US president George Bush, in a speech, was seen making virtue signalling sermons against ‘one man’s decision to invade a country’, in an attempt to criticise Vladimir Putin. However, Bush mentioned that country as ‘Iraq’ in an apparent slip of the tongue, only to correct it later and say that he meant Ukraine.

Bush was reportedly speaking on the issue of election integrity at the Southern Methodist University’s George W. Bush Institute. While criticising Russia’s election process, he said, “Russian elections are rigged. Political opponents are imprisoned or otherwise eliminated from the electoral process”.

“The result is an absence of checks and balances in Russia, and the decision of one man to launch a wholly unjustified and brutal invasion of Iraq”, the ex-President of the USA blurted out. Then, a moment later, he corrected himself adding ‘I mean of Ukraine, heh”.

Noticing that the audience has laughed, he then muttered, “Iraq too, .. anyway, 75, huh” conveying that the apparent gaffe was because of his age.

US invasion of Iraq under Bush

While Bush was the President of the USA, the USA had claimed that the Saddam Hussain regime had harboured weapons of mass destruction and terrorists and had started a brutal invasion of the country in 2003 while trying to justify the barbaric attacks and hundreds of civilian deaths as a ‘fight for democracy’.

No weapons of mass destruction were ever found in Iraq. The US invasion and carpet bombings had destroyed the country, caused hundreds of civilian deaths and plummeted the region into chaos. Over 250,000 people died as a result of Bush’s war on Iraq, including over 5000 us soldiers.

The USA, UK, Australia and Poland had started a massive war that involved ‘shock and awe’ bombings against Iraqi installations, both military and civilian. Saddam Hussain was captured and executed 3 years later. The then UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan had called the invasion illegal and a violation of the UN charter.

The resultant unrest and chaos fanned widespread conflicts in the region.

After his father had stopped Hindus from doing puja at Gyanvapi Shringar Gauri temple, Akhilesh Yadav insinuates that it’s a make-belief temple: Watch

Akhilesh Yadav, the former Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister and the Samajwadi Party chief has gone on to mock Hindu beliefs while disregarding claims that a Shivling has been unearthed inside the disputed Gyanpavi premises. Speaking at a press conference in Ayodhya, the SP chief insinuated that it is a make-belief temple within the disputed Gyanvapi mosque premises.

“In our faith, if you place a rock beneath a peepal tree and put a red flag on it, Hindus start worshipping it, believing it to be a temple,” the Samajwadi Party supremo stated, belittling the Hindu faith and beliefs.

“As far as the court is concerned, the SC had earlier ruled that such old matters cannot be raised. Even after this, the BJP is spreading hatred between Hindus and Muslims so that core issues are not discussed,” Yadav told reporters here.

The SP supremo, who had in 2020 declared that Shri Ram belongs to his party and he and his party men are Ram Bhakts and that the Ram Mandir in Ayodhya would have been built in one year had there been a Samajwadi Party government in the state, went on to further cast doubts on the Ram Mandir alluding that the Hindus have acquired it by force. He said that “There was a time when idols were kept in Ayodhya in the dark hours of the night. BJP can do anything, the party cannot be trusted. The BJP is attempting to destabilise the atmosphere. The party is deliberately attempting to immerse people in issues of religion, caste, and religion to divert their attention from the real issues.

The SP chief also attacked the Center, claiming that the central government is striving for ‘One Nation, One Businessman’. He alleged that the government is selling off companies to big businessmen, banks are being merged, the Life Insurance Corporation (LIC) is being privatised, airports are being sold, state wheat is being sold to a handful of industrialists and being exported abroad and the BJP is using the Gyanvapi issue as a smokescreen to draw away the attention of the public from such genuine concerns.

He accused the current dispensation of using a ‘divide and rule’ policy to stay in power. There has never been such widespread injustice and oppression of the people as there is now under this administration. This regime simply uses religion and caste to intimidate people, said Akhilesh Yadav.

In an apparent reference to the drives against encroachments in the state, Yadav also attacked chief minister Yogi Adityanath and said bulldozers are running in the state but a hospital inaugurated by him was “illegal”. The CM had inaugurated a private hospital in Nirala Nagar on Monday.

Mulayam Singh, the father of Akhilesh Yadav had stopped Hindus from doing puja at Gyanvapi Shringar Gauri temple

Well, Akhilesh Yadav’s remarks against Hindus do not come as a surprise considering the political legacy Akhilesh Yadav has inherited from his father Mulayam Singh Yadav who had earned the sobriquet ‘Mullah Mulayam’ by the Muslim community for issuing brutal orders to fire at Hindu karsevaks who had gathered at the then disputed Babri structure site to reclaim the Janmabhoomi(birthplace) of Lord Rama.

At the height of his power, as the Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh, he felt emboldened enough to order firing upon Karsevaks during the Ram Janmabhoomi movement resulting in the death of innumerable Ram Bhakts. This episode, which was one of the worst cases of human rights violations in Independent India, was not the only instance where one could openly see Mulayam Singh Yadav’s animosity against Hindus.

In fact, in 2004, the Samajwadi Party patriarch had barred Hindus from worshipping at the Mata Shringar Gauri temple while he was the chief minister of the state. In fact, BJP spokesperson Prem Shukla had recently revealed how Mulayam Singh Yadav, who was then the CM of Uttar Pradesh, ordered to halt regular puja performed at the Maa Shringar Gauri Temple which was in violation of the Worship Act 1991. He had said that prior to his order, puja was performed in the Mata Shringar Gauri Sthal round the year. 

Shukla accused Mulayam Singh Yadav of Muslim appeasement, stating that his government banned worship at Mata Shringar Gauri in 2004 due to their vote bank politics. He added that prayer in this temple had even continued after the Babri building was demolished in 1992.

As law and order deteriorates in Punjab, CM Bhagwant Mann focuses on swiftly getting rid of pet dogs from govt accommodation within a week: Details

In a new order, Punjab CM Bhagwant Mann has banned government employees from keeping pet dogs in govt accommodation. The Punjab Government has asked Police officers residing in Government bungalows and quarters to move their dogs out within a week.

In an order dated May 13, The Additional Director General of Police, Patiala has categorically asked police officers to remove pet dogs from their government residences if they do not have permission for the same. “Those employees who have adopted pet dogs at their homes, do they have permission for the same as per PPR 3.32?” the letter asks. The ADG has asked that the officers who have not complied with the same should move their pet dogs out of the residential quarters within a week.

The order issued by ADG Patiala over the removal of Dogs from Government quarters. Image Courtesy: Dainik Tribune

According to the order, any employee who refuses to do so will be prosecuted. Battalion Quarter personnel and Line Officers have been asked to ensure compliance with the above orders. A follow-up report on the action will be taken in this regard.

BJYM National Vice-President Tajender Pal Singh Bagga has lashed out at the AAP government in Punjab who has said that Bhagwant Mann is going after the dogs. In a tweet, he wrote, “All the issues are over in Punjab, where helpless CM Bhagwant Mann has gone after dogs. When you bring an animal into the house, it eventually becomes like a family. Only an insensitive person can ask for the removal of dogs within a week.”

Deterioration of law and order in Punjab

While Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann is concentrating on getting rid of pet dogs, the law and order situation in the state has been on a steady decline every since AAP came into power.

After Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) won a thumping victory in Punjab absolutely destroying Congress and Shiromani Akali Dal, Punjab has seen a spike in murders in the state, with even famous Kabaddi players not immune to the violence, videos of the open sale of drugs in the state are going viral, and the state even witnessed communal violence after many many years. 

Within the first 3 weeks of the AAP government coming to power, the state saw 19 murders, including 3 targeted killings. The rising crime graph in the state drew sharp criticism from all quarters but didn’t matter to Punjab Police. Even ruling Aam Aadmi Party’s supporters are not safe in the state right now as Dharminder Singh, president of the kabaddi club at Daun Kalan village, and an AAP campaigner, found out when he was brazenly killed.

Just recently, a couple was brutally murdered in Ludhiana while their daughter could hear their shrieks. These are hardly isolated cases in Punjab over the last 2 months as criminals are getting more and more brazen, and openly executing their activities.

While the law and order slips in the state and even Khalistanis get emboldened, there are questions now being raised about the AAP government’s priorities as it concentrates on separating families from their pets.

Chhattisgarh: Ishtiaq Alam gives Triple Talaq to wife over phone for not giving birth to a child, says ‘talaq, talaq, talaq’ and disconnects call, case registered

On Thursday, the Chhattisgarh Police registered an FIR against a person named Ishtiaq Alam for divorcing his wife over the mobile phone. The Police said that the accused uttered ‘Talaq’ three times on the phone while he was in conversation with his wife and divorced her.

According to reports, Ishtiaq Alam, a resident of Balumat, Jharkhand married the victim in the year 2007. The lady was tortured by her husband and father-in-law for not giving birth to a child. In October 2021, she then shifted to her maternal home in Chhattisgarh and told her family members about the torture she had to face in Balumat.

In an attempt to pacify the matter, the parents and brother of the victim asked her to keep calm and talk to her husband. The accused on October 19, 2021, however, divorced the lady over the phone. “I divorce you, talaq, talaq, talaq”, he said and disconnected the call. Alam continued to harass and torture the lady victim as she along with her brother travelled to Balumat to confirm the incident. He locked her in a room and abused her. The lady and her brother then found out that Alam had already married another girl. The duo returned to Chhattisgarh in dismay.

The victim later decided to fight legally against accused Alam and lodged an official complaint on May 17. While the police are investigating the matter, Bhaskar Sharma, SHO Kunkuri, Jashpur have assured that the accused will be arrested soon. “The victim came to her maternal home for some time and when she called her husband to take her back, he gave divorce to her on phone. We’ve registered the case and the accused will be arrested soon”, he confirmed.

Few more recent cases of Triple Talaq

It is pertinent to note that this is not the first time that a case of triple talaq has cropped up after the Triple Talaq bill was passed in the year 2019. Earlier on March 28, 2022, in Madhya Pradesh, a Muslim youth named Farukh had given triple talaq to a Hindu girl after eight years of marriage and had pressurized her for halal. The Police booked the accused under the Religious Freedom Act, triple talaq law, dowry harassment, and atrocity act based on the complaint filed by the victim.

On May 5, 2022, a Class-II officer named Sarfaraz Khan Bihari was sentenced to one year’s imprisonment and a Rs 5000 fine under the Triple Talaq law in Gujarat. The victim woman, Shenazbanu, was harassed and divorced after the accused fell in love with a Hindu girl working in his office and ran away with her. The police registered a case under sections 498 (a), 323, 294, 504, and 506 (2) of the IPC as well as under the Muslim Protection Act’s sections 3, and 4. The matter went to the additional court in Palanpur and the verdict of the case was delivered on May 4.

Also on January 30, 2022, the Talaiya police station in Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, had lodged a case of triple talaq against her husband. The woman informed the police that her husband used to abuse her and that when her parents intervened and prevented the son-in-law from harassing her, he said Talaq three times and left, stating the relationship had ended.

The Triple Talaq Act passed in 2019

Under the Triple Talaq Act enacted by the Central Government, any person who leaves his wife by uttering talaq thrice through oral, written, or any other means is an offense. The accused can also be arrested without a police warrant and can be punished for upto three years. The aggrieved woman herself or her relatives can file a case in the matter.

In the current case, the Jashpur Police has registered the case against accused Ishtiaq Alam and booked him under the relevant sections of Triple Talaq Act. The Police has assured his arrest. Investigations are underway.

‘Remnants of old Hindu temple clear inside Gyanvapi, Shringar Gauri, Sheshnaag, lotus structures found’: Former court-appointed survey commissioner Ajay Mishra’s report

Ajay Mishra, the former court-appointed commissioner tasked with surveying the Gyanvapi disputed structure has submitted his findings in the form of a report at the Civil Judge’s court in Varanasi. Ajay Mishra’s report details the findings of the survey done by him on May 6 and 7 inside the Gyanvapi disputed structure.

Ajay Mishra in his report has submitted that the survey was done by him on May 6 and May 7 and the Muslim side had gathered a mob of over 100 people during the survey to hinder their work. The Muslim side has been continuously uncooperative during the course of the survey and tried a lot to prevent a detailed survey, Mishra’s report has stated.

As per Mishra’s report, inside the disputed structure that the Muslim side claims to be a mosque, there are stone carvings of Hindu Gods and Goddesses on the North-Western side of the central part, just outside the barricading. The report further states that the ancient stone structures with Hindu symbols like the lotus and idols, which are clearly the remnants of an earlier Hindu temple, can be seen in the Gyanvapi structure.

Mishra’s report stated that there has been ‘newer’ construction work using iron rods and concrete near the old structures. While walking towards the west from the northern side, old stone carvings of ‘Seshnaag’ can be seen. All these have been video graphed for evidence. The stone slabs also possess old carvings that have been painted saffron, and multiple such carvings which are clearly Hindu idols and symbols have been video graphed inside the Gyanvapi premises. Several stone slabs and blocks were reportedly scattered on the ground in a manner of an old remnant of a demolished structure.

The report states that 4 distinct idols painted red with sindoor in a pattern as described for the Shrigar Gauri shrine are distinctly visible on a stone slab inside the premise. It also mentions that the slab bears the marks of Hindu rituals, as having been worshipped and diyas being lighted, flowers being offered by the devotees. All of these have been video graphed. The commissioner was informed that the structures and slab are remnants of the Shrigar Gauri shrine which is inside the central structure, and entry is prevented for Hindus. So the devotees worship only the remnants of the entrance and offer prayers to Shringar Gauri.

Mishra’s report mentions that the stone carvings are similar on the eastern sides and western sides of the so-called masjid, indicating that they all have been a series of carvings of a larger structure that has been broken. The report stated that though the court had ordered that the survey commissioners should be granted access to the central structure and enclosed areas of the Gyanvapi structure, including locked portions, the Muslim side gave several excuses to prevent the same.

Report submitted by Ajay Mishra

Mishra’s report further states that even on the second day of the survey, the other side had caused delays and the proceedings could be started only at 3.45 pm.

Mishra states that he had tried to confirm if the saffron tinged carvings are indeed from the old Shrigar Gauri temple described in several Hindu texts. He was reportedly told that the presently visible structures are remnants from the old broken Shrigan Gauri shrine and these structures have been worshipped by Hindus for years. The present remnants are reportedly the ruins of the entrance of the ancient Shringar Gauri shrine.

Report submitted by Ajay Mishra

Mishra has further submitted that he had tried to inspect the barricaded area too but the Muslim side did not cooperate. Finally, the inspection had to be halted at 4.50 pm on May 7. The report mentions that the video files of the survey have been submitted as per procedure in sealed packets at the court’s treasury, as ordered by the court.

Ajay Mishra was removed, current commissioner submits report of survey done on May 14,15 and 16

It is notable here that the Muslim side had accused court-appointed survey commissioner advocate Ajay Kumar Mishra of not being ‘impartial’, and had submitted a plea to remove him at the Varanasi court. Though the petition was dismissed on May 7, later on May 17, the court had removed Mishra from the position of survey commissioner over alleged ‘leaks’ of reports to the media.

Advocate Vishal Singh was then appointed as the commissioner and was asked to submit a report in 2 days. Vishal Singh has stated to ANI that the removal of Ajay Mishra was a ‘misunderstanding’ and he had never asked for it.

Singh has now reportedly submitted the detailed report of the commissioning done on 14, 15 and 16 May at the court today on May 19. The 15-page report has been submitted in sealed packaging. As soon as details of the report are available, we will report.

Maharashtra: Juvenile Justice Board releases ISIS terrorist after 3 years to be a home tutor for school students, serve at old age home, despite conviction

In a controversial order, a juvenile justice board in Maharashtra has decided to release an ISIS terror convict and allowed him to be a tutor to school children in his locality despite his conviction.

According to the reports, a three-member juvenile justice board (JJB) presided over by the principal magistrate granted a benefit to an Islamic State terrorist convicted for his terror acts, a juvenile at the time of his arrest, by ordering his release despite being convicted in a terror case. The JJB ordered his release on the grounds that he has already spent the three-year sentence in an observation home since January 23, 2019.

In a ruling on May 11, the JJB also directed the terror convict, referred to as a “child in conflict with the law (CCL)”, to be allowed to do community service under the supervision of a probation officer, as provided under the Juvenile Justice Act.

The court has also ordered that the convicted terrorist be allowed to serve at an old age home twice a month for the next six months and give tuition classes in Maths and English to children of Classes 7 and 9 in his locality as part of community service.

The JJB said that the CCL is released on a good behaviour bond for the period of one year and is placed under the supervision of a probation officer in Thane.

JJB convicts ISIS terrorist, but releases him

Strangely, the order came after the JJB convicted the accused for his involvement in the terrorist activities under Section 120-B (criminal conspiracy) and 201 (destruction of evidence) of the Indian Penal Code, besides, Sections 18 (conspiracy), 20 (being a member of a terrorist gang or organisation), 38 and 39 (offences relating to membership and support given to terrorist organisation).

The Juvenile Justice Board also ordered that terror convict be sent to a special home for three years. However, the JJB considered the period he had already served in an observation home and ordered his release.

“From the evidence of witnesses, confession of CCL, social media panchanama, subscriber detail and call data records, location of CCL, I have no hesitation to conclude that prosecution has established that CCL being a member of a terrorist organisation, a banned organisation in India knowingly facilitated, advised and abetted and conspired with members of ISIS and others for the commission of preparatory to the commission of a terrorist act,” the Juvenile Justice Board said.

The JJB had further observed that the ISIS terrorist was actively involved in the terrorist activities and participated in the conspiracy against the country with an intention to further the activities of the said terrorist organisation.

Maharashtra ATS had arrested terror suspects for their links with the ISIS

Reportedly, the terror convict was 17 years, a minor, when the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) had arrested him, along with other members, on December 27, 2018, for being part of an organised module of banned Islamic terror organisation ISIS. The Maharashtra ATS had arrested the terror accused, who had formed an organisation ‘Ummat-E-Muhammadiya’ to commit acts of terror in Aurangabad and Mumbai.

In August 2018, the Aurangabad unit of the state ATS had detained nine persons, including the minor suspect, on suspicion of being influenced by ISIS and planning a terror attack. The ATS had alleged that the nine terror accused were indoctrinated with the ideology of the terrorist organisation ISIS. They had hatched a criminal conspiracy to carry out the terrorist attack using some poisonous substance and explosives in Mumbai, Aurangabad and other places.

Subsequently, an FIR was registered with the ATS police station at Kala Ghoda in Mumbai for offences under Section 120-B (criminal conspiracy) of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 18, 20, and 38 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act and Section 135 of the Maharashtra Police Act.

The ATS had contended that the minor terror accused be treated as an adult. However, the JJB rejected the ATS’s plea in October 2019. The ATS moved to the sessions court, which also upheld the JJB’s order in May 2021. The Bombay high court at Aurangabad had also dismissed its criminal revision appeal.

The arrested have been identified as Salman Khan, Fahad Shah, Zamen Kutepadi, Mohseen Khan, Mohammad Mazhar Shaikh, Taki Khan, Sarfaraz Ahmed, Zahid Shaikh and a 17-year-old. One of the arrested people is said to be the son of Rashid Malabari, a close aide of Dawood Ibrahim. All the arrested are well-qualified persons with two engineers, one pursuing engineering, one Pharmacist and a class 11th student among them.

‘Tolerance is the hallmark of Hinduism’: Says Madras HC in its order over chanting rituals at a Tamil Nadu temple

On Tuesday, hearing a case concerning the right to worship of two Hindu sects, the Madras High Court noted that tolerance is the hallmark of Hinduism, reports Bar and Bench.

The Madras High Court bench led by Justice SM Subramaniam heard a petition to decide a dispute between two sects over chanting recitals at the Sri Varadaraja Perumal Temple in Tamil Nadu. A dispute had arisen between two sects – Vadagalai and Thengalai after the temple’s executive trustee had issued a notice prohibiting the Vadagalai sect from chanting recitals at the temple.

The petitioners representing the Vadagalai sect had urged the court to grant permission to chant prayers in the Sri Varadaraja Perumal Temple in Tamil Nadu, citing their fundamental right of worship. The petitioners stated that they were not disrespecting the rights conferred on the Thengalai sect by virtue of customary practices, however, they pleaded that their rights were being violated by preventing them from worshipping their guru.

However, the respondent argued that a decree from the year 1915 allowed only the Thengalai sect to recite at the temple.

Hearing the arguments, Justice SM Subramaniam pointed out that tolerance is the hallmark of Hinduism, and both sects should be allowed to do hold recitals and pray as per their faith and customs. The judge also said that devotees could not be denied their right to worship at any cost and directed the authorities to allow both the Vadagalai and Thengalai sects to chant their prayers at the Sri Varadaraja Perumal Temple.

“Tolerance is the hallmark principle in Hinduism. Mutual understanding, respect and glorifying the Lord alone will preserve the sanctity of the Temple activities, and therefore, both the sects are expected to do services to Lord Sri Varadaraja Perumal instead of fighting on trivial issues of this nature”, the judge observed.

In its order, the Madras High Court also emphasised that religion may not lay down a code of ethical rules for its followers, but it may prescribe rituals and ceremonies regarded as integral parts of a religion.

“Therefore, the constitutional guarantee of freedom of religion enshrined in Article 25(1) extends even to rites and ceremonies associated with a religion,” Justice Subramaniam held.

Hence, in this regard, the court noted that the sentiments of both the sects should be respected, and mutual respect between them was of paramount importance.

The court also observed that every devotee has got a right to enter the temple and worship Lord Sri Varadaraja Perumal in the way he likes without affecting the rights of other devotees/worshippers and temple activities.

The court also noted that the Vadagalai sect would be provided with an opportunity so that they were not deprived of its primacy as they claimed by virtue of the 1910 decree.

The Madras High Court also imposed the rules for the traditions to be followed inside the Hindu temple, saying that the Thengalai sect shall be permitted to start their initial recital, namely Srisaila Dayapathram and later, the Vadagalai sect shall be allowed to chant the initial recital namely Sri Ramanuja Dayapathram within 10 to 12 seconds each.

Then, both the Thengalai sect and Vadagalai sect, along with ordinary devotees, shall be permitted to jointly chant Naalayira Divya Prabandham in an uninformed manner without any disruptions to the rituals and poojas or any inconvenience to the other devotees and worshippers.

“On completion of chanting of Naalayira Divya Prabandham by Vadagalai sect, Thengalai sect and ordinary devotees, jointly the final ritual namely Vazhithirunamam may be firstly chanted by Thengalai sect, i.e., “Manavalamamunigal Vaazhithirunamam” and after that, the Vadagalai sect shall be allowed to recite their concluding Mantra, i.e., “Desikan Vazhi Thirunamam” and accordingly, the entire process of rituals shall be concluded,” the court directed.

Earlier in February, the Madras High Court had issued a similar order directing a Hindu petitioner to exhibit tolerance after he moved the court, complaining about the use of loudspeakers in a newly constructed church in Neduvilai in the Kanyakumari district of Tamil Nadu.

The petitioner, identified as one C Kishore, had filed a writ petition in the Madras High Court wherein he challenged the permission given by the Kanyakumari District Collector to one Y Thangaraj to construct a Church. He complained that Thangaraj had been creating a ‘nuisance’ by conducting prayers through loudspeakers, both during the day and night. 

The matter was heard by a Single Judge Bench of Justice CV Karthikeyan, who rejected the plea asking the petitioner to ‘show tolerance as he is Hindu’.

Gyanvapi: Hindus should have their moment of catharsis and Muslims can find real heroes, not rapists and barbarians, but the lying ‘Left’ must stop

The Gyanvapi issue has come to the fore. There is more. These will not go away. Because we never had a chance to hear or read the truth – the first step to reconciliation. With lies, there can only be angst and protest.

The simple fact is, though Hindus may be numerically majority, our collective grievances over Islamist violence and horrors are not just genuine but have festered and worsened over years due to deliberate neglect and blatant disregard. It was as if we are not humans and should suffer endlessly without any noise. For the mythical “idea of India”.

We were told that just talking about our grievances is fascism. “Oh, that happened a few centuries back, why rake up now?”. But then that too is a blatant excuse just to shut us up. As we saw recently, just making a film about the recent (not 12th century) Islamist genocide in Kashmir has not just been attacked brutally and mercilessly but also used by Islamo-fascists and Stalinist “liberals” to justify the brutal murder of yet another Kashmiri Hindu.

It is ridiculous to argue that we lose our right to true history just because we are the majority. China still talks about the atrocities of the Japanese during their occupation, although there are hardly any Japanese in China and Japan is a much smaller country. 

Then we will be told, “Oh they are foreigners, but Muslims may have invaded, but they are Indians!”. 

This argument too is false because simply settling down not only doesn’t take away the original sin, but it also actually makes it much worse in fact! At least the ones that loot and scoot let you rebuild in peace until they return. As Prof Abhishek Banerji has pointed out, native Americans still have grievances from the 19th century and earlier. Just try telling the American Indians who were butchered and scalped or the Australian aborigines who had their children stolen about the “syncretic, composite culture” created by the white invaders who chose to settle down! You will be cancelled immediately. 

The “they are part of the fabric” is false in another sense because most Muslims are after all Indians just like you and me, not Arabs, Persians or Turks! It is the Pakistanis, to mirth and ridicule, that go chasing for their non-existent forefathers in Arab or Persian lands. Therefore, criticising the Portuguese for inquisition or Mughals for their fanatic barbarism and inhuman savagery is not an attack on Indian Muslims of today’s India at all! It is simply a historical fact. A pasmanda Muslim can happily join his Hindu brothers and sisters in abusing the Islamists because he has nothing to do with them other than the fact that there’s a common religion shared.

Then other bizarre arguments are put forth like Mughals “protected us” from Chengiz Khan, Mongols, Timur etc bit like saying you should be happy to be mugged in the street because a rapist could not attack you at the same time.

Hindus can and should have their moment of catharsis. Muslims can find their real heroes. And India can move on. 

But for all this to happen, the Stalinist left must be forced to stop lying and stop treating history as yet another weapon in its Pol Potist pogrom on the Hindu faith. A faith they recognise as the biggest stumbling block to their grabbing power through violence.

Let me explain further

This may come as a surprise to you, but we must give one thing to the Muslims – they never lied about their conquests and victories and their acts of vandalism. All the lying has been by the left and a few fascist looter dynasts and their corrupt ecosystem. 

Whether you read the writings of the original invaders or their official and contemporary historians, their chroniclers, and courtiers, or listen to Pakistan’s (certified by numerous well-meaning observers as the successor state to Mughals) numerous politicians, mullahs and others, or even many of India’s Muslims in social media and elsewhere, they have taken collective pride in the conquests and the destructions that came with it. They rub it in at every turn. Rajputs, whose kings have died fighting invaders and women forced to commit “sati” have been ridiculed so many times. It is exactly this sentiment and mindset that even a communist poet like Faiz was targeting when he spoke about breaking idols. He knew that would hit home. He knew all this bs talk of Ganga-Jamuna Tehzeeb is just for Hindus.

Let us give it to them – they have never been hypocrites

But it is the Stalinist left that found that too inconvenient. Instructions from the Politburo mass murderers to “eminent historian” coolies was very simple – even if a Muslim conqueror admits to atrocities, find ways to suppress it or spin it. Boy, did they obey! 

They wanted to sugarcoat and whitewash. Why? Because it suited their agenda – that of obliterating Hinduism from this land. They wanted us to live in ignorance, ashamed of our past, mind and soul completely wiped clean of any pride in the past or awareness of truth, so that their imported ideology of rapist savagery, mass murders and serfdom to the despot in Beijing can take its place.

While Beijing coolie left had enough of its own reasons to hate Hinduism, the “all-weather, sweeter than honey” alliance signed by their Global Headquarters with the jihadi terrorists in Pakistan merely added another wing to this strategy. 

And to keep the Muslims fooled, they made heroes out of barbarians and savages. Because, as I have pointed out earlier, their biggest threat is a Muslim that thinks like an Indian and respects Kalam and not Aurangzeb or Tipu. How to make sure that never happens? Well, manufacture fake heroes and falsify history.

For corrupt, fascist looter dynasties, this strategy came in handy too. After all, a Muslim that thinks like his Hindu brother and votes like him on secular issues cannot be a vote bank. He must live in rage and hate. Then he can be sequestered, branded like cattle, and traded in the political marketplace.

This vicious cycle created by the CONLEFT cabal can easily break if we as Indians, both Hindus and Muslims, can force the left to stop lying. Therefore, the Gyanvapi issue is not just a Hindu issue. It concerns all of us.

When the truth is allowed to be spoken, the inevitable consequence would be catharsis. Our collective grief can be discussed, tears shed over, lessons learnt, and residue safely consigned to history. Reconciliation too, inevitably follows. 

We, as a people, can find solutions – perhaps let some of these monuments of hate stand as reminders for the future like the Genbaku dome in Hiroshima. Perhaps some others can be set right through discussions. But Stalinist rapists and mass murderers and their pseudo-intellectual servants must have no seat on this table – whether they turn up in liberal masks or otherwise.

Madhya Pradesh: Muslim mob pelts stones, assaults people in a wedding procession of Dalit groom, 5-year-old girl critical

On May 17, a Muslim mob pelted stones on a Baraat (wedding procession) of a Dalit man when it passed through the road in front of a mosque in Rajgarh, Madhya Pradesh. The incident took place in the Jirapur Mataji locality. As per reports, the Baraat was playing music that allegedly irked the Muslim mob, so they started pelting stones and bricks at them.

Four people have been reportedly injured from the Baraat side, including a five-year-old girl who sustained serious injuries and has been referred to Ujjain for further treatment.

Injured Baraati. Source: Dainik Bhaskar

The Police were informed about the incident. The Jirapur Police reached the spot and registered a case against six people based on the complaint of the victims. The incident was captured in CCTV footage.

Station in-charge Prabhat Gaur said in a statement that Anju, daughter of Madan Malviya, was scheduled to get married to Suresh Chauhan’s son Lucky. Baraat came from Susner and had reached Jirapur. When the procession was taken out at around 11:30 PM, around 20-25 people from the Muslim community came and beat up people from the Dalit side. They also beat up the band members for playing the drums. Initial investigation revealed the dispute between the two communities started over the wedding procession playing music on the public road in front of the mosque.

Based on the complaint of Madan Malviya, a case has been registered against Samar Lala, Farhan Khan, Junaid Khan, Sohail Khan, Sabir Khan, Anas Kasai and Dagga Khan and others under sections 294, 336, 506, and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and sections 3(1) and 3(2) of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The Police are checking CCTV footage to identify other miscreants involved in the case.

SP Rajghar said on Twitter three more accused had been identified in the matter.

‘Band and music are not allowed in front of the mosque’, said the Muslims to the Baraat passing on the road

Ankit Malviya, cousin and brother of the bride, said they were waiting at the gate for the Baraat. When the Baraat reached the road near the mosque, the local Muslims stopped them and stated that playing music is not allowed near the mosque. The Baraat moved ahead and started playing music only after reaching Sheetla Mata Temple.

When the Baraat was crossing the Temple, a mob of 20-25 people from the Muslim community came and created a ruckus. They beat up the band members and busted the drum. After that, they beat up the people in Baraat as well. He further said stones and bricks were pelted at the Baraat.

Ankit added the incident messed up the celebrations. The members of Groom’s family were injured and left without eating food. The father of the bride had taken Rs 1 lakh loan for the wedding. The marriage was done in the presence of only 10-15 members of the family, including the parents of the bride and groom.

Delhi Police interrogates AltNews co-founder and self-proclaimed ‘fact-checker’ Mohammed Zubair for doxxing and harassing a minor girl

AltNews co-founder and alleged fact-checker Mohammed Zubair was recently interrogated by the Delhi Police in connection with a case of online harassment and doxing a minor girl child on Twitter.

According to Delhi Police sources, the Delhi Police summoned the alleged fact-checker Mohammed Zubair on May 13 to interrogate him in the case registered against him for harassment case. The Delhi Police questioned Zubair based on a complaint filed by the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) in connection with the matter.

On August 7, Mohammed Zubair indulged in an online spat with Twitter user Jagdish Singh. The AltNews co-founder targeted a minor girl in his Twitter fight with this social media user. Instead of replying to the user directly, Zubair had brazenly referred to a minor girl seen in the profile picture of the user Jagdish Singh, presumably his granddaughter.

After Zubair had highlighted the minor girl seen in the photo, Islamists started to issue rape threats to the girl. Zubair’s tweet came under heavy criticism from social media users who accused him of shamelessly using a child to get back at a critic.

When one Twitter user had tagged National Commission for Women to raise the alarm about the predatory behaviour by Zubair, the co-founder of AltNews brazened it out, justifying his blatant doxxing that was clearly endangering the life of a minor.

The Child Rights Commission had taken cognisance of the matter and initiated action against the ‘fact-checking’ website AltNews co-founder Mohammed Zubair, who tweets from his verified handle @zoo_bear. NCPCR chief Priyank Kanoongo had also informed Twitter India and the concerned law enforcement officials about the tweet and had asked to take appropriate action.

Subsequently, two FIRs were registered against Mohammed Zubair for online harassment of a girl child while arguing with a Twitter user. In the first FIR filed by Delhi Police, the stringent POCSO Act was not added. However, in the second FIR filed against Zubair in Chhattisgarh, along with the relevant sections of the IPC and IT Act, POCSO Act was also invoked.

However, the Chhattisgarh High Court had granted interim protection to Alt News co-founder Mohammed Zubair while hearing his plea to quash the FIR filed against him under IPC Section 509B, IT Act section 67 and POCSO Act.