Home Blog Page 184

The Govt is not backing ABC rules over stray dog problem: How activists, and media spun a false narrative over a Lok Sabha reply

On 19th August, Congress MP Gurjeet Singh Aujla asked in the Lok Sabha about the steps the Government of India was taking to control the growing menace of stray dogs. He asked if there is a national policy in place for the same. In response, Minister of State for Fisheries, Animal Husbandry and Dairying, Prof SP Singh Baghel, gave a written reply.

The minister’s answer was straightforward. In the reply, the ministry said that stray dog management falls under the jurisdiction of state governments and urban local bodies. They are bound to carry out sterilisation and vaccination under the Animal Birth Control (ABC) Rules, 2023. These rules, framed under the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, are in line with World Organisation for Animal Health standards.

The ministry further added that the Centre provides limited financial support, that is, Rs 800 per dog and Rs 600 per cat for sterilisation and vaccination programmes, grants for shelters and veterinary hospitals, and assistance for anti-rabies vaccines. He also referred to advisories issued on multiple occasions that urged states to strengthen sterilisation drives.

Notably, the reply or the question did not mention the Supreme Court’s 11th August order directing Delhi-NCR authorities to remove stray dogs and put them in shelters in far-off areas. The process, which is supposed to happen in a phased manner, has been initiated. However, the matter has been referred to a larger bench which did not stay the 11th August judgment immediately and reserved the order on 14th August.

Furthermore, the reply by the ministry did not contain any new policy or announcement. It was a procedural status update and nothing more. The reply was also published by Press Information Bureau (PIB).

Activist spin on social media

Yet, the answer was spun into a narrative by a self-styled dog lover activist on social media. In her post on multiple platforms including X and Instagram, she declared it as “Good News” and claimed that the “Central Government comes out in support of their ABC Rules”. She further claimed that the government had “reiterated commitment to humane sterilisation” amid the Supreme Court order. Other self-styled dog lovers amplified this message, projecting a fresh policy stance while no such thing existed.

How media reports distorted the reply

Mainstream media also joined in. Times of India ran a piece suggesting that the government has cleared its stand which “validates the viewpoint of protesting animal rights activists” against the Supreme Court’s 11th August order. This is a false link. The reply in Parliament makes no mention of the apex court’s order.

Source: Times of India

Even the government’s broadcaster DD News interpreted it wrongly and dressed the procedural note as the Centre’s “resolve” to humane sterilisation. The report inserted details of the Supreme Court’s reasoning, which again were absent from the Lok Sabha record.

Source: DD News

Deccan Herald also exaggerated by saying “Centre directs states” when in reality only advisories that were issued earlier were mentioned in the reply.

Source: Deccan Herald

The staggering cost of a failed programme

Assuming India has around 5 crore stray dogs, and the Centre wants 70% of them sterilised under ABC Rules, that amounts to 3.5 crore dogs. At Rs 800 per dog, the total cost comes to a staggering Rs 28,000 crore. This is taxpayer money being funnelled into a programme that has already failed to control the dog population for over two decades.

Not to forget, this calculation does not even include the unbelievable burden of providing anti-rabies vaccines to tens of lakhs of bite victims every year. Why should citizens who do not wish to live surrounded by stray dogs be forced to pay for it? If NGOs and self-styled dog lovers insist that dogs remain on the streets, why is the financial burden not placed squarely on them instead of the public exchequer?

The real picture

The real picture is clear. The minister’s answer was a dry, bureaucratic explanation of existing schemes and responsibilities. There was nothing new, no confrontation with the Supreme Court, and no fresh policy. Yet, activists and sections of the media turned it into a manufactured headline, feeding a narrative that the Centre had “chosen sides” in the stray dog menace debate.

This is how a simple parliamentary reply, meant to reiterate existing procedures, was opportunistically twisted into a propaganda-filled narrative-setting message.

Blackmail, fake rape cases, extortion and more: How Akhilesh Dubey built a 1500 crore criminal empire in Kanpur, syndicate exposed after BJP leader’s complaint

Ravi Sateeja, a member of the Bharatiya Janata Party, had raised a complaint after a person named Akhilesh Dubey initiated a false POCSO (Protection of Children from Sexual Offences) case against him. Sateeja submitted that the Dubey concocted allegations to extort Rs 50 lakh for a settlement. The matter pertained to Kanpur in Uttar Pradesh.

The police investigation revealed no incidence of rape, however, Dubey continued to demand money from him. Afterward, the probe led to the discovery that exposed the criminal empire established by the lawyer-turned-land mafia. It was revealed that he had seized government properties worth Rs 1500 crores in the city.

Dubey was running schools, guest houses and commercial ventures on these properties. The total market value of these properties surpasses Rs 2500 crores. Nevertheless, senior officials could not muster the the courage to take action against him. He used to even draft charge sheets for the police.

Notably, several IPS (Indian Police Service)-PPS (Provincial Police Service) officers are also part of the syndicate, having laundered their illicit earnings into land and various companies through Dubey. The truth was revealed when Kanpur Police Commissioner Akhil Kumar arrested him. Now, five FIRs have been filed against Dubey in the last seven days.

Rs 2 lakh rupees for every fake case

“Advocate Tonu Yadav enticed me with financial incentives and introduced me to Akhilesh Dubey. I lodged a fabricated rape allegation against Ravi Sateeja on his behest. I received between Rs 50,000 and 2 lakh for each case. He assured me that the police would take no action. The women in our neighborhood are also involved in this scheme with Dubey,” revealed the young woman who lodged a false rape case against Ravi Sateeja at the Barra police station, reported Dainik Bhaskar.

She added, “Tonu sent over 10 women from the colony to Chhattisgarh when the SIT (Special Investigation Team) commenced their inquiry. My younger sister also eloped with a boy.” She is currently in police custody and is being interrogated. The woman even informed the police that Dubey operates multiple syndicates for the purpose of managing girls and extorting money.

“I reside in a temporary house in Usmanpur Kachhi Basti. There are two of us sisters. We earned our living by working as help in houses. Lawyer Tonu Yadav, also known as Shailendra, has an office in the colony. I became acquainted with him around 6-7 years ago. He introduced me to Dubey,” DCP (Deputy Commissioner of Police) South Deependra Nath Chaudhary said quoting the woman.

A former Miss Uttar Pradesh is also part of his gang alongside over 12 girls. All of them file false rape cases for him. Their activities are not limited to Kanpur and target individuals from other districts and even other states. Dubey instilled fear through this gang and created a massive empire through blackmail. Meanwhile, the police supported Dubey at every stage.

The same was affirmed by Chaudhary who revealed that the Miss Uttar Pradesh even married two men, trapped them in false cases and extorted crores of rupees after she was inducted in the gang with promises of financial incentives and career opportunities by Dubey. She was even given a new name “Vishkanya” and she became his closest ally. The cops are now searching for her.

She started residing on his campus and received protection from a leader who was associated with Dubey. The mafia even appointed her as the district president of the women’s wing within his organization.

Close ties between Dubey and police

The investigation uncovered that Dubey’s closeness to police officers increased as a result of his involvement in writing Fard (land records). He established connections with constables, inspectors and even Superintendents of Police. He falsely accused individuals of rape and extorted money from them, exploiting his relationship with the cops.

Dubey had numerous properties registered in his name and even unlawfully seized someone’s house. He acquired land valued at over 1500 crores. “The inquiry conducted thus far has uncovered that Dubey’s primary tactic involved filing false rape allegations. He accused influential individuals, extorted money and resolved property conflicts,” the authorities stated.

A Special Investigation Team (SIT) was formed by the Police Commissioner to probe into fake rape cases. During the course of the inquiry, 54 false rape cases were revealed in order to implicate others. 10 to 12 of these cases were specifically connected to Dubey.

Dubey never appeared in court to argue a case and maintained his own court within his office where he would deliver verdicts. His role primarily involved handling paperwork for police officers related to their investigations. The documentation for significant cases was processed in his office. He used to take advantage of this authority and would alter the names of individuals.

This created an atmosphere of fear, allowing him to exert control in Kanpur for the past 30 years. The Police Commissioner’s PRO (Public Relations Officer) also worked for Dubey.

Dubey held his daughter’s wedding at the Taj Hotel in Agra which was attended by 40 to 50 IPS officers along with several PPS officers, inspectors and sub-inspectors. Senior IPS officers were greeting the baraatis at the event. Officers were even serving food to them.

Dubey even launched a news channel to amplify his power. He established a syndicate of lawyers and included a number of police officers. He began to partner with prominent builders in ventures involving schools, guest houses, shopping malls and land. His powerful network extended its reach into every department, from the office of the Divisional Commissioner to the District Magistrate as well as the Kanpur Development Authority, Municipal Corporation and Police Department.

Dubey’s neighbour also submitted an application to Akhil Kumar stating that she was a partner in a hotel. He subjected her to severe torture to occupy control of the property. He physically assaulted her, employed his henchmen to loot her, demanded a ransom and issued threats to her life.

The complainant highlighted that other partners fled but she didn’t and hence Dubey tried to tarnish her character through the distribution of an obscene booklet. She felt helpless as the police were also under his influence.

Court grants 14 days judicial remand

The police apprehended Akhilesh Dubey, Ayush Mishra, and Shailendra Yadav alias Tonu Yadav in connection with the extortion of Rs 50 lakh by falsely implicating Ravi Sateeja in a bogus rape case.

The court granted one-day judicial remand for Dubey and his accomplice Mishra under the charges of extorting money through threats of an offense that could lead to death or life imprisonment along with criminal conspiracy. According to the court’s order, the remand was sanctioned on 7th August and is valid until 20th August.

Therefore, an extra day of judicial remand had been granted under the newly applied sections. The hearing is scheduled to take place through video conferencing on 20th August and the investigating officer is required to bring the case diary.

Dubey similarly lodged a bogus rape case at the Kalyanpur and Naubasta police stations to trap an advocate in response to the complaint over the occupation of King Yayati’s fort. A final report was released by authorities after the inquiry. Afterward, a demand for Rs 10 lakhs was put forward in the name of protest.

Consequently, a case was initiated at the Kotwali police station accusing ten people, including Dubey of extortion, abuse and death threats. The court presided over by Chief Judicial Magistrate Suraj Mishra granted a 14-day judicial remand in the matter.

Akhilesh Yadav’s ‘voter-deletion’ claims collapse as UP district officials confirm names belong to dead, duplicate or still-registered voters

Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav also joined the chorus of the INDI Alliance leaders against the Election Commission of India. Recently, he accused the election body of removing the names of the backward and the most backward class voters, which form Yadav’s party’s vote base, from the electoral roll in Uttar Pradesh in collusion with the ruling BJP.

During a demonstration in Parliament on Monday (18th August), Yadav distributed copies of affidavits he claimed to have filed with the Election Commission alleging targeted deletion of voters from the voter list in Uttar Pradesh. Speaking to the media, Yadav claimed that he filed around 18,000 affidavits with the poll body pointing out discrepancies in the voter lists in constituencies such as Amapur, Bakshi Ka Talab, Jaunpur Sadar and Kursi.

He also posted copies of the receipts received in response to the affidavits, alleging that the Commission had wrongly denied receiving any complaints/affidavits regarding vote deletion. “The Election Commission is claiming that they have not received the affidavits provided by the Samajwadi Party in UP; they should check the acknowledgment receipt issued by their own office as proof of receipt of our affidavits. This time, we demand that the Election Commission provide an affidavit stating that the digital receipt sent to us is authentic, otherwise, not only the ‘Election Commission’ but also ‘Digital India’ will come under suspicion. If BJP goes, truth will prevail!,” Yadav wrote on X on Sunday (17th August).

Akhilesh Yadav got fact-checked

However, Yadav’s allegations of targeted deletion of votes were refuted by the District Magistrates of various districts in Uttar Pradesh. Responding to Yadav’s allegations, DM Jaunpur said that a complaint was received via email alleging erroneous deletion of names of five voters in the Jaunpur Assembly Constituency 366 in the Jaunpur district. The DM said that the complaint was baseless as the names of the five voters had passed away before 2022. Their names were removed after their death was confirmed by their family members, locals and the local councillor.

DM Barabanki also countered Yadav’s accusations of malicious vote deletion and clarified that the complaints about the deletion of the names of 2 voters of the 266-Kursi Assembly constituency in Barabanki district were false. He added that the names of the voters are registered in the voter list.

Similarly, DM Kasganj also rebutted the allegations of deletion of the names of 8 voters in the 101 Amanpur Assembly Constituency of Kasganj District. The DM clarified on X that the names of 7 of these voters are still registered in the voter list. He said that their names were listed twice and therefore, only the duplucate entries were removed.

Regarding the deletion of the name of the eighth voter, the DM said that his name was removed after his wife filled Form 7 seeking the removal of his name following his death.

The District Election Officer (DEO), Lucknow, also contradicted the allegations of the deletion of the names of 13 voters in the 169-Bakshi Ka Talab assembly constituency of the Lucknow district. The DEO wrote on X that the names of all the voters existed in the voter list except for two voters.

One voter was removed in 2012 as per the rules, as he no longer resides in the area, and the name of the other voter, who was a woman, was removed after her death.

The allegations levelled by Akhilesh Yadav are part of a combined attack launched by the opposition parties against the Election Commission. The parties have been opposing the routine revision of electoral rolls by the election body. The opposition’s attacks began last month when the Election Commission conducted a Special Intensive Revision in the poll-bound state of Bihar. The INDI Alliance leaders have been using all tricks in the book, from moving the Supreme Court to creating public uproar, to cast aspersions on the Election Commission.

Supreme Court orders Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) to protect, repair two Dargahs in Delhi’s Mehrauli, prevents any unauthorised construction: Read details

0

The Supreme Court has directed the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) to take charge of repairing and renovating two Muslim religious sites inside the Mehrauli Archaeological Park in Delhi, including the 13th-century Ashiq Allah Dargah (1317 AD) and Chillagah of Baba Farid.

The order came on Tuesday, 19th August, from a bench of Justice BV Nagarathna and Justice R Mahadevan, while hearing an appeal against a Delhi High Court ruling.

The appeal was made because there were concerns that these centuries-old monuments might be demolished by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA). 

The DDA demolished a 600-year-old mosque, Masjid Akhonji, as well as Madrasa Bahrul Uloom and some graves in the same compound, earlier this year in January 2024.

The petitioners, who were spearheaded by Zameer Ahmed Jumlana, contended that it could be done to other monuments such as the 14th-century Ashiq Allah Dargah and Chillagah of Baba Farid. They insisted that these are ancient monuments under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains (AMASR) Act, 1958, albeit that they are not presently listed as “protected monuments.”

High court’s stand

The case first went to the Delhi High Court. However, the High Court refused to issue any clear order for the protection of these structures. The judges observed that the monuments did not appear ancient, partly because poor restoration work had covered the old walls with new tiles.

The High Court also took note of the government’s assurance that no protected or national monuments would be demolished. It said there had to be a balance between protecting heritage and removing illegal encroachments, so it disposed of the matter.

Advocate Nizam Pasha, representing the appellants, told the Supreme Court that according to a recent ASI report, the structures are indeed very old, dating back to the 12th or 13th century. Thus, he argued, this makes them historically important and clearly within ASI’s jurisdiction.

On the other hand, the DDA’s advocate Nitin Mishra submitted that the location formed part of a designated forest area. He explained their main concern, was the illegal constructions around these monuments. He added that if, in the future, there is ever a plan to remove any old structure, it would only be done with permission from the Religious Committee formed by the court.

Supreme Court’s decision

After hearing both sides, the Supreme Court agreed that the structures are ancient. It noted the ASI’s detailed report and ordered that the ASI must now take charge of their repair and renovation.

At the same time, the bench clarified that under the garb of seeking protection of the ancient monuments, unauthorised constructions cannot seek ASI’s protection.

In its order, the Court said: “We dispose of these appeals by observing that the ASI should take under its consideration the supervision of monuments in question, the matter of repair and renovation. With these observations, the appeal is disposed.”

Rahul Gandhi’s ‘vote theft’ poster boy in Bihar exposed as a fraud: EC busts RJD BLA Subodh Kumar’s lies with hard evidence

The Election Commission of India has left Congress leader Rahul Gandhi embarrassed, again. The ECI factchecked yet another lie of the Congress prince as he continues peddle falsehoods to back his ‘vote chori’ campaign. During his ‘Vote Adhikar Yatra’ in poll-bound Bihar, Rahul Gandhi alleged that the name of one Subodh Kumar was remove from the draft electoral roll.

Taking to X on 19th August, Rahul Gandhi said, “What happened with Subodh Kumar Ji is happening with millions of people in Bihar. Vote theft is an attack on Mother India – the people of Bihar will not let this happen.”

In the viral video, Subodh Kumar alleged that his name had been removed from the draft electoral roll. during his ‘Voter Rights Yatra’, Rahul Gandhi handed over the mike to a person on the stage in Nawada and said, “His name has been deleted from the voter list, this is happening with lakhs of people.” This person was Subodh Kumar, who, as soon as Rahul Gandhi got on the chariot, alleged in front of the camera that his name was missing from the voter list.

It, however, turns out that Rahul Gandhi’s claim is baseless. The Election Commission said that this person named Subodh Kumar is not a common voter, but he is a booth level agent (BLA) of the Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) and his name was never in the voter list even before the Special Intensive Revision of the electoral roll. Thus, the claim of arbitrary deletion of Subodh Kumar’s name is false.

The ECI stated that Kumar’s name was not found even in the list deleted voters, published in accordance with the Supreme Court order.

In addition, the poll body said that Subodh Kumar did not submit any claim or objection under Form-6 or the required declaration after the publication of the draft roll. Moreover, Kumar was present when the deletion list was pasted at polling station number 10 for public notice and he raised no objection.

“The Electoral Registration Officer stated that upon reviewing the consolidated electoral roll published under the Special Summary Revision 2025 (dated 29.10.2024), the subsequent supplementary list (qualifying date 01.01.2025), and the draft of the Special Intensive Revision 2025 (dated 01.08.2025), it was found that while other members of Shri Subodh Kumar’s family were transferred from Polling Station No. 09 (Anu. Pra. Vi., Mahrath, Western Part, House No. 126) to Polling Station No. 10, Shri Subodh Kumar’s name was never recorded in the electoral roll at any time,” the Bihar Chief Electoral Officer stated on X.

Debunking Rahul Gandhi and Subodh Kumar’s lies, District Election Officer, Nawada said, “It is clear that the allegation made by Subodh Kumar regarding deletion of his name in the SIR 2025 is baseless and untrue. If he submits Form-6 and the required declaration in future, his name will be included in accordance with law”.

Calling a person named Subodh Kumar on the stage, handing him a mike and making him make allegations in front of the camera… all this was pre-scripted. Rahul Gandhi called it an ‘ attack on Mother India ‘. However, it is evident that it is Rahul Gandhi, who through his sinister ‘vote chori’ campaign is attacking Bharat Mata and undermining India’s robust democracy for petty political gains.

This is not the first time Rahul Gandhi has made such a baseless allegation. Earlier, in Aurangabad, he had raised the case of a woman named Ranju Devi , claiming that her name too had been deleted from the voter list. But later Ranju Devi herself said in a video that her name is present in the voter list and she had been misled.

ICSSR, Ministry of Education body that funds CSDS, calls Sanjay Kumar’s fake data fiasco a ‘gross violation of grant rules’, issues show cause notice for using fake data to peddle political narratives against ECI

On 19th August, the Indian Council of Social Science Research (ICSSR), a body under the Ministry of Education which funds the Centre for the Study of Developing Societies (CSDS), strongly criticised the fake data fiasco involving CSDS’s Sanjay Kumar. In a statement, ICSSR said that Kumar’s false claims on Maharashtra’s electoral rolls and their subsequent amplification against the Election Commission of India (ECI) amounted to a “gross violation of the Grant-in-Aid rules”. The council announced that a show cause notice would be issued to CSDS for its conduct.

In its statement, ICSSR noted that the incident had brought disrespect to both the institute and the electoral process. The statement read, “It has come to the notice of ICSSR that an individual holding responsible position at CSDS, an ICSSR-funded research institute, has made media statements that had to be retracted subsequently citing glitches in data analysis regarding elections in Maharashtra.

Further, the institute has published media stories based on biased interpretation of the SIR exercise by the Election Commission of India.

ICSSR holds the Indian constitution in highest esteem. Election Commission of India is a high constitutional body which has been holding free and fair elections in the largest democracy of world for decades together.

ICSSR takes serious cognizance of the data manipulation by CSDS and its attempt to create a narrative with the intention of undermining the sanctity of the Election Commission of India. This is a gross violation of the Grant-in-Aid rules of ICSSR, and ICSSR shall issue a Show Cause Notice to the Institute.”

How the fake data fiasco unfolded

The controversy began when Congress spokesperson Pawan Khera posted a graphic on X on 18th August and claimed massive discrepancies between the 2024 Lok Sabha and Maharashtra Assembly electoral rolls.

Citing Lokniti-CSDS data, he claimed that Ramtek and Deolali constituencies lost nearly 40% of their electorate within six months. On the other hand, Nashik West and Hingna gained around 45%. He mocked ECI and wrote, “Next they will announce that 2 plus 2 equals 420.” The figures were first pushed by Sanjay Kumar himself.

In his now-deleted post on 17th August, Kumar claimed that Nashik West’s electorate had swelled from 3,28,053 in the Lok Sabha rolls to 4,83,459 in the Assembly rolls which was around 47.38%. For Hingna, he claimed an increase of 42.08%. These figures suggested abnormal and implausible growth. They were promptly amplified by opposition leaders including Khera as they questioned the credibility of the Election Commission.

However, on 19th August, within 48 hours of his post on social media platform X, Sanjay Kumar issued a public apology. He admitted that the figures were wrong. He claimed that his “data team misread rows” while comparing the datasets.

He further noted that the original post was deleted and claimed there was “no intent to spread misinformation”. However, the damage was already done, with the false figures circulated widely and poised to linger in political forwards and social media posts.

The real numbers expose the falsehood

Official data published on the website of the Election Commission of India showed that the discrepancies claimed in Sanjay Kumar’s post never existed. OpIndia’s fact-check confirmed that Sanjay Kumar’s figures were grossly inflated.

While confirming the data, OpIndia found that in Nashik West, the actual electorate increased from 4,56,319 in the Lok Sabha to 4,83,719 in the Assembly rolls, a modest rise of 27,400 or six per cent, nowhere near the 1.5 lakh jump he claimed. In Hingna, the increase was 25,298 (from 4,24,454 to 4,50,439), far below the exaggerated 43 per cent.

Similarly, in Ramtek, the electorate rose from 2,76,827 to 2,87,301, an increase of just 10,474 or 3.8 per cent, not a collapse of 40 per cent as claimed. Deolali saw a rise of 11,216 (from 2,77,600 to 2,88,816), contradicting the claim of a steep fall.

These numbers were enough to demonstrate how Sanjay Kumar’s numbers were nothing more than “misread rows” in a spreadsheet. It was evident that his team neither double checked nor compared constituency abstracts correctly, ignoring the basic standards of data verification.

The larger concern

While Kumar dismissed the fiasco as a technical error, the episode highlighted an alarming lack of diligence at a taxpayer-funded research institute. ICSSR has made it clear in its response that the issue goes beyond a “misread row” and falls under violation of grant rules. Given the damage already caused to the credibility of the ECI and the future impact of sharing the fake data on platforms like WhatsApp, it is essential for the ICSSR and the ECI to take strict action against CSDS. The notice now issued to CSDS is likely to put the institute’s practices under deeper scrutiny.

Fertilisers, rare earths, and tunnel boring machines: Read how China lifting curbs is a pro-India move as both nations try for better relations

Donald Trump, the President of the United States, has been attacking India over purchasing Russian oil, though US keeps trading with Russia. Putting additional tariffs and even openly declaring the tariffs as ‘sanctions’, the current White House administration is hell bent on antagonising India.

While Trump continues to make outrageous statements and unsuccessfully attempts to pressure India, the Modi government is deepening its relationship with Russia and repairing its ties with the historical adversary, China. Notably, China had also been involved in a tariff battle with the US president previously.

Trump’s attempt to bully India are also demonstrating favorable results for the country, as in a notable development, China has announced the removal of restrictions on the export of fertilisers, rare earth magnets/minerals and tunnel boring machines to India, reported The Economic Times. These three demands were presented to Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi by External Affairs Minister Dr S Jaishankar during a meeting between the two, during last month.

On 18th August, Yi, who is on a two-day visit to India, conveyed to his Indian counterpart that China had already begun to address Indian requests over these three issues. According to those with knowledge of the specifics, shipments have already started on the Indian end. India and China also reached an agreement to sustain the progress of their bilateral relations following discussions between Wang Yi and Dr. S Jaishankar.

The availability of di-ammonium phosphate during the Rabi season was directly affected by abrupt fertiliser restrictions, which India had brought to China’s attention. Shipments of tunnel boring machines, including those made by multinational companies in their China-based facilities, were earlier halted by China en route to important infrastructure projects in India.

Chinese limitations on rare earth magnets and minerals have raised serious concerns in the electronics and automotive industries, resulting in shortages that might severely hinder output. However, the fresh developments took place as Beijing and New Delhi agreed to progressively normalise their relationship.

How rare earth mineral restrictions shocked auto industry 

According to the International Energy Agency, China produces 92 per cent of the world’s refined output and more than 60 per cent of rare earth mining, owing to large state subsidies and lax environmental regulations. Beijing had been requiring Chinese enterprises to seek a licence before exporting these minerals, including rare earth magnets, to any country since April.

The world auto industry was rocked when Beijing which has a near monopoly on the production of rare earth elements used them as a major weapon in its now-over trade dispute with Washington. Seven of the seventeen rare earth elements (REEs), samarium, gadolinium, terbium, dysprosium, lutetium, scandium and yttrium were subjected to export limitations. Rare earth magnets are essential for the production of automobiles.

India with the third largest automobile industry in the world was also targeted despite having significant rare earth reserves, particularly in areas like Andhra Pradesh and Odisha as its capabilities for extraction, separation and refinement continue to lack. China has a near monopoly in the processing stage, which uses sophisticated, expensive, and environmentally hazardous techniques that India has not yet been able to develop.

The import of rare earth magnets into India had been suspended. The importers had to endure a laborious 40-45 day procurement procedure that involved paperwork, authentication by the Directorate General of Foreign Trade and submission to China’s Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM), exporters, and the Chinese Embassy in New Delhi.

The automakers struggled to maintain manufacturing lines as their rare earth magnet supplies started running low. Delays in their delivery could have adversely affected the electric two-wheeler industry and resulted in inflation. Ravi Bhatia, president and director of JATO Dynamics India, anticipated a price hike of 5-8% and a manufacturing delay of two to six months, according to a report in Mint.

The problem is that rare earth magnets are required for motors, power steering, windscreen wipers and other components in even ICE (Internal Combustion Engine) cars. India has been totally dependent on China to meet its expected 6,000 to 7,500 tonne yearly demand for rare earth magnets in the electric car sector.

This worried the Indian auto industry, especially the producers of electric vehicles, since assembly lines could stop if even one component is absent. Leading domestic automakers and industry associations such as the Automotive Component Manufacturers Association and the Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturers cautioned that if the license requirements continued, output could be negatively affected.

Numerous Indian automakers obtained authentication from the Chinese Embassy out of more than 30 applications, nevertheless, despite outreach by the Indian Embassy in China, no firm was approved by China’s MOFCOM approximately 11 weeks after the limitations went into effect.

As Union Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal voiced “hope” that China would authorise exports soon, India which obtained 93% of its REEs from China in 2024-25, suspended a 13-year REE export agreement with Japan in order to protect domestic supply.

Recycling e-waste presents a viable domestic solution to recover essential minerals. However, India now recycles barely 22 per cent of its 62 million tonne of yearly e-waste. The ambitious national incentive program for recycling essential minerals which has been allocated 1,500 crore remains in final phases of development and could take years to be completed.

Furthermore, there are currently very few startups and institutions in India’s technology ecosystem working on motors and rare earth-free technologies. The monthly motor output of those with active manufacturing only meets a small portion of the needs of the car industry while the majority are still in the research and development alongside planning stages.

Importing REEs from China was clearly more difficult for Indian automakers than for those in the United States and Europe. India enhanced its domestic strategies under the National Critical Mineral Mission to decrease dependency on imports and create long-term resilience in critical mineral supply chains.

Nevertheless, it would have required an extensive duration for these plans to come to fruition as the automobile sector would have had to deal with the consequences of China’s decision.

India faced fertiliser crunch after China halted the export

China is a crucial supplier of vital inputs like water-soluble fertilisers (WSFs) for India’s agriculture specifically horticulture. Crops like pomegranates, bananas, grapes and other fruit depend on these fertilisers. However, India’s agricultural industry faced serious difficulties as a result of China’s ban on fertiliser exports particularly with regard to speciality fertilisers and essential nutrients like urea and di-ammonium phosphate (DAP).

China, a major provider of agricultural inputs worldwide, stopped granting export permits for DAP since the middle of 2023 and cut off the flow of speciality fertilisers to India completely in recent months but supplies to other countries persisted. This sudden interruption affected Indian farmers before the critical kharif or monsoon planting season and caused a steep drop in world supply and drove prices upward.

China used the Customs Inspection Quarantine (CIO) to halt or limit the export of agrochemicals and fertilisers. Its Mono Ammonium Phosphate (MAP) imports fell by more than 80% between 2023 and 2024. Indian manufacturers reported that they had trouble obtaining approval to acquire materials from there. The excessive reliance on some Chinese chemicals and herbicides resulted in their prohibition or inquiry.

India imports an extensive quantity of fertilisers especially DAP and nitrogen-based chemicals like urea. The nation produced very little of its own speciality fertilisers due to technological constraints and traditionally limited demand.

India’s DAP opening inventories on 1st June were only 12.4 lakh tonnes, a substantial decline from 21.6 lakh tonnes in 2024 and 33.2 lakh tonnes in 2023 to zero in 2025. This raised concerns regarding crop yields and sowing efficiency.

A third of the agricultural GDP comes from horticulture in India. Crops that depend on exports such as tomatoes, bananas and grapes are also susceptible to the quality of their inputs. Moreover, uncertainty and high input costs make India less competitive internationally in exporting fruits and vegetables.

On the other hand, Indian fertiliser policies are reportedly biased towards bulk urea rather than speciality inputs required for high-value horticulture. The speciality fertilisers market was especially hard hit by the move.

The yield of high-value crops including fruits and vegetables, soil health and nutrient absorption are all improved by these water-soluble fertilisers, micronutrients, nano and biostimulant varieties. Although these fertilisers are more technologically sophisticated and not subsidised, India generally imported approximately 150,000 and 160,000 tonnes between June and December.

China had historically been able to provide about 80% of this demand. A total cease, however, disturbed this balance and substitute sourcing from nations like Saudi Arabia, Morocco, Russia and Jordan proved unable to cover the deficit.

The abrupt supply stifling of the global phosphate markets triggered restrictions. The price of imported DAP increased from $515 to $525 per tonne in mid-2024 to over $810 in mid-2025. When prices reached this point, profit margins of fertiliser producers were squeezed and subsidy bills of governments grew as a result of capping fertiliser retail prices to protect farmers.

The availability of phosphoric acid was limited which resulted in production bottlenecks in India’s expanded DAP output. The cost of this crucial input was also rising as parties attempted to bargain over the price. The option of integrating upstream and investing in local phosphate deposits was required due to the subject industry’s dependence on foreign raw materials.

Tunnel Boring Machines encouter Chinese wall

There were worries that India’s flagship bullet train project could be delayed as three enormous tunnel boring machines intended for the Mumbai-Ahmedabad high-speed rail link had been stalled at a Chinese port, including the biggest which was constructed for utilization in the country.

These were constructed in Guangzhou by German tunnelling expert Herrenknecht and are crucial to the 21 kilometer subterranean portion of the route from Bandra-Kurla Complex (BKC) to Shilphata. One was supposed to arrive earlier this year while the other two were scheduled by October 2024.

However, the Chinese port authorities did not grant any clearance. The reason for the delay was not formally explained either. Diplomatic channels were used because the holdup affected not only the TBMs but also other components essential for civic works.

An official pointed out, “The equipment includes not just the TBMs but also parts critical for other infrastructure works.” According to sources, a prolonged delay could have a major impact on development, especially on the underwater section beneath Thane Creek.

The ₹1.08 lakh crore project has been carried out by the National High-Speed Rail Corporation Ltd (NHSRCL) which intended to employ TBM-1 and TBM-2 for digging between Sawli (Ghansoli) and BKC as well as TBM-3 between Vikhroli and Sawli. The 7 kilometer section of the route that ran beneath Thane Creek is India’s first underwater rail tunnel and among the corridor’s most technically challenging parts.

India’s imports of self-propelled TBMs rose significantly in 2021 and 2022 with the majority coming from outside of China. However, India was nearly entirely dependent on China in 2019 in terms of both value and volume of standard TBMs.

Fostering ties at critical time

The restoration of ties between the elephant and the dragon has occurred at a pivotal moment when the United States has been firmly focused on opposing India. It even provided absurd justifications for its aggression against India for acquiring Russian oil while being permissive towards China for engaging in similar actions.

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio while acknowledging the hypocrisy shamelessly defended, “Well, if you look at the oil that’s going to China and being refined, a lot of that is then being sold back into Europe. Europe is also buying natural gas still. Now, there are countries trying to wean themselves off it, but there’s more Europe can do with regard to their own sanctions.”

Meanwhile, Wang Yi’s arrival in India and his meeting with Prime Minister Narendra Modi as well as other top officials prompted a stir in international diplomatic circles and undoubtedly in Washington as well. The visit has been characterized by the reopening of channels where interests intersected but caution was still exercised.

Trump’s policy did not manage to compel an ally like India into submission, instead, facilitated a thaw in relations with its enemies. The decision to prioritize a terror state like Pakistan to provoke India has ultimately backfired for the United States. On the other hand, it has played a key role in improving the previously strained relations between the world’s second-largest economy and the soon-to be third largest economy globally.

The talks between the two sides even extended beyond supply chains. The restoration of border trade, the easing of visa requirements and the resumption of direct flights, all halted since the 2020 Galwan clashes were also discussed without any compromise on its sovereignty by New Delhi. The issues have not been settled and there is a significant amount of distrust that can only be changed over time in light of China’s actions, however, it is certainly a step forward in that direction.

Trump hopefully gained insight into what a multipolar world resembles owing to the meeting, as Washington desperately seeks to cling to the fading concept of a unipolar world where the US dictates all decisions and sovereign nations are compelled to adhere. It is essential for Western powers to recognize that nations like India cannot be subjected to dictation but rather treated as equals, entitled to defend their interests, if the latter desire to maintain friendly relations with it.

Conclusion

India is now skillfully managing risks by wisely accepting economic concessions that boosts progress while firmly upholding its sovereignty and strategic autonomy. It has exhibited confidence and assertiveness with its diplomatic strategies being designed for a larger arena that included Washington.

While Trump might continue to seethe and lash out from his Oval Office or praise the de facto leaders of Pakistan and even announce yet another project with Islamabad, New Delhi has already made it clear that it has carved out a path of self-interest and sovereignty for itself and will not succumb to any pressure, regardless of their tariffs or underhanded tactics.

The enduring warm relations with Russia coupled with the recent series of meetings involving officials from India and China affirm the same.

Jalaluddin-led Balrampur Islamic conversion racket: Names of Samajwadi Party leaders also emerge in the case, victim says she was raped and then forcefully converted to Islam

In the Islamic conversion racket case from Balrampur, which was headed by Jalaluddin aka Chhangur Baba, another incident of forced conversion and sexual exploitation has come to the fore. A victim from Uttar Pradesh’s Kushinagar revealed her ordeal during a press conference at the Lucknow office of Vishwa Hindu Raksha Parishad. The victim said that the leaders of the Samajwadi Party gang-raped her, converted her, and then left her after sexually exploiting her.

Drugs, forced marriage, and conversion to Islam

The victim said that in 2017, when she was a high school student, she met Bablu Khan alias Rafi Khan. Bablu took her to his house and raped her for three days.

Later, Rafi Khan introduced her to his friends Naushad alias Nata Nawab and Alamgir Ansari, who took her to Jalaluddin aka Chhangur Peer baba. The victim said that Chhangur made her marry Naushad after giving her intoxicants and offering ‘paan’ and converted her religion.

The accused have been identified as Samajwadi Party leaders, and their pictures have also surfaced with SP chief Akhilesh Yadav. The victim added that Naushad took her to Mumbai, where she stayed for a year and was subjected to sexual exploitation constantly.

Gang rape and blackmailing

This, however, is not the first time that the heinous crimes of Jalaluddin gang have been exposed. Earlier, victims from Bengaluru and Auraiya had also shared similar stories. The Bengaluru victim shared that she was gang-raped in Saudi Arabia, was blackmailed, and ₹10 lakh was extorted from her.

The accused Wasim had befriended her on Instagram by posing as Raju Rathore. The victim from Auraiya said that her father was trapped on the pretext of getting him rid of alcohol addiction, and later the accused married her.

In all these cases, the victims say that the criminals were protected by the local police, due to which their complaints could not be registered. The president of the Vishwa Hindu Raksha Parishad has accused the police of not helping without money. He has demanded the government to take strict action against Chhangur Peer’s gang, as his henchmen are still roaming around and pose a threat to the victims.

It must be recalled that in July this year, the  Uttar Pradesh Anti-Terrorist Squad (ATS) exposed a Rs 100 crore Islamic conversion racket run by Jalaluddin alias Chhangur Baba in Balrampur district. This racket was luring non-Muslims, especially Hindu girls, into conversion through romantic relationships or using force.

On the 5th of July 2025, the Uttar Pradesh ATS arrested Jalaluddin alias ‘Chhangur Baba’ along with his wife from Gomti Nagar. Jalaluddin ran an Islamic conversion racket spread across the country. This racket run by Jalaluddin involved foreign funding worth hundreds of crores. It has been reported that Jalaluddin received foreign funding of approximately Rs 500 crores, with Rs 200 crores confirmed and the remaining Rs 300 crores allegedly sent through Nepal.

More than 100 bank accounts were opened in the border districts of Nepal, including Kathmandu, Nawalparasi, Rupandehi, and Banki, receiving money from Islamic countries.

His entire family was involved in the racket. Jalaluddin’s son, Mehboob and a close aide were arrested by the ATS in April this year. Subsequently, following an investigation, the ATS registered a case against 10 people, including Jalaluddin, who had a reward of Rs 50,000 on him.

Jalaluddin used to provide money to Muslim men for luring Hindu women and converting them to Islam. The Muslim men used to fake their identities and take Hindu names to target Hindu women. Jalaluddin used to perform Muslim marriages (Nikah) of these Muslim men with Hindu women whom they lured or forced to convert.

Jalaluddin had a fixed incentive structure for conversions. Rs 15-16 lakh was fixed for conversions of Brahmin, Sikh or Kshatriya women, Rs 10-12 lakhs for OBCs and Rs 8-10 lakhs for other castes. The accused Jalaluddin had also published a book, ‘Shijra-e-Tayyaba’, meaning ‘To propagate Islam’.

India and China signal cautious thaw: Modi stresses ‘fair and reasonable’ boundary resolution, to join SCO Summit in Tianjin

0

Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Tuesday met Chinese Foreign Minister and Politburo member Wang Yi at his residence, 7 Lok Kalyan Marg, in New Delhi, as part of Wang’s ongoing three-day visit to India. The meeting came amid cautious signs of improvement in bilateral ties following the 2020 border standoff in eastern Ladakh.

According to the official government statement, Wang Yi handed over a message and formal invitation from Chinese President Xi Jinping for the upcoming Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) Summit in Tianjin. The Chinese minister also conveyed his “positive assessment” of talks held earlier with External Affairs Minister Dr. S. Jaishankar and National Security Advisor Ajit Doval, including the 24th round of Special Representatives’ dialogue on the boundary issue.

The Prime Minister underscored the importance of “maintaining peace and tranquillity on the border” and reiterated India’s commitment to a “fair, reasonable and mutually acceptable resolution” of the boundary question. He welcomed what he described as “steady and positive progress” in relations since his meeting with President Xi in Kazan last year, highlighting cooperation built on “mutual respect, mutual interest and mutual sensitivity.” He also noted the resumption of the Kailash Manasarovar Yatra as a sign of this progress.

Thanking Xi for the SCO invitation, Modi conveyed his acceptance and expressed support for China’s presidency of the summit, while stressing that “stable, predictable and constructive ties between India and China will contribute significantly to regional and global peace and prosperity.”

Wang, for his part, told Indian officials that the setbacks of recent years “were not in our interest,” but that “stability has now been restored at the borders.” He welcomed Modi’s forthcoming participation in the SCO Summit, remarking that “history and reality show that a healthy relationship between India and China serves the long-term interests of both countries.”

NSA Ajit Doval earlier noted an “upward trend” in the situation, crediting the leadership-level meeting in Kazan for setting a “new environment” that had allowed progress in both security and bilateral exchanges. External Affairs Minister Jaishankar, while affirming the importance of maintaining momentum, stressed that “peace and tranquillity in the border areas” remained the essential foundation for any forward movement in ties and underlined counter-terrorism cooperation as a key priority.

Delhi: FIR filed against self-styled dog lovers who attacked MCD officials for carrying out dog-catching operations on Supreme Court’s directions

0

On 18th August, an FIR was filed at KN Katju Police Station in Rohini against self-styled dog lovers who assaulted Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) officials in Rohini on Monday. The officials were carrying out dog-catching operations in line with the Supreme Court’s 11th August order when they were attacked, their vehicle vandalised, and captured dogs forcibly released. The FIR was registered based on the complaint of MCD officials.

OpIndia spoke to the Station House Officer (SHO) of the concerned police station. The SHO confirmed that an FIR had already been registered on 18th August based on the complaint received at the police station. He further said that the accused who attacked MCD officials and vandalised the van had been identified and further action was being taken in the matter.

Complaints by Vijay Goel and the veterinary officer

Former Union Minister and Lok Abhiyaan convener, Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader Vijay Goel, lodged a formal complaint and demanded strict action against those who obstructed officials from executing court orders. Goel said such individuals were not only endangering citizens but also defying the judiciary. OpIndia accessed copies of complaints filed by Goel and Veterinary Officer Dr Ravish Kasana in the matter.

In his complaint, Goel said, “In light of these serious threats posed by these individuals by indulging in violence and the contempt of Hon’ble court directions, I request you to kindly take immediate action against these individuals/NGOs and file charges against them under all relevant sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS).”

Veterinary Officer Dr Ravish Kasana, in his complaint to the police, detailed how MCD staff were surrounded by an aggressive mob, assaulted, and forced to release dogs they had caught. Their official vehicle was attacked, the ignition key was taken away and the log book was stolen as well. He urged for CCTV footage to be examined, stolen items recovered, and those responsible prosecuted for obstructing public servants, assault, theft and vandalism.

Dr Kasana said in his complaint, “A group of unknown dog lovers surrounded the official vehicle, assaulted the staff, vandalised the dog-catching van by breaking its glasses, and forcibly took away the vehicle tools, the ignition key, and the log book before fleeing the scene.”

He added, “It is further requested that CCTV footage of Sarvodaya Vidyalaya and nearby cameras be collected and examined to identify the offenders, recover the stolen items, assess the damage to the vehicle, and take necessary legal action. Additional documents and CCTV footage, once available, will be provided by this office.”

Sections that can be imposed

In his complaint, Goel insisted Delhi Police book the self-styled dog lovers under several sections of the BNS including, but not limited to, Section 125 for endangering life or personal safety, Section 221 for obstructing a public servant in discharge of duty, Section 223 for disobedience to orders by a public servant, Section 224 for threatening a public servant, Section 270 for public nuisance, Section 285 for causing danger or obstruction in a public way, and Section 324 for mischief. Together, these provisions outline the serious criminal liability faced by those who indulged in violence and intimidation against MCD staff.

Vijay Goel’s remarks to OpIndia

Speaking to OpIndia, BJP leader Vijay Goel said, “We have been running this movement for the last two years and have no vested interest. These people are the ones with vested interests. Their numbers are negligible. Delhi has 7,000 RWAs and none stand with them. They are self-styled dog lovers. They neither adopt these dogs nor take them home. In reality, they are now defying Supreme Court orders. Action will be taken against them.”

What happened on 18th August

As reported earlier, videos showed officials being threatened with dire consequences and their van being vandalised. In one clip, an MCD officer was forced to record a statement warning colleagues not to pick up dogs if they wanted to avoid assault. Several Instagram pages later circulated the footage as a “victory” against MCD, openly glorifying the attack.

Supreme Court’s warning

In the 11th August order, the Supreme Court warned that any hindrance or obstruction in implementation would be treated as contempt of court and dealt with in accordance with law. This warning accompanied the earlier mandate to begin picking up dogs across Delhi-NCR without delay.