Home Blog Page 3030

Ajmer police to investigate links between PFI and arrested Gauhar Chisti, who had raised ‘sar tan se juda’ slogans outside Ajmer dargah

A day after police brought Gauhar Chishti to Ajmer from Hyderabad, the Ajmer Superintendent of Police, Chuna Ram held a press conference and said that they would investigate all the possible angles in the case, including the Popular Front of India (PFI) links.

Gauhar Chishti, who had raised slogans of beheading against former BJP spokesperson Nupur Sharma, has been arrested by the police from Hyderabad on 14th July 2022. On June 17, Gauhar Chishti had raised the objectionable slogans outside the Ajmer dargah.

Speaking about the arrest, the SP revealed that Chisti had tried to flee by jumping from the 1st-floor window when the Ajmer police with the help of Hyderabad police nabbed him. He was hiding in the house that belonged to his friend Mohammad Amanutallah alias Munnawar in Hyderabad since July 1. Munnawar ran a bangle shop in Hyderabad. The five-member team which went to nab Chisti had also arrested Mohammad Amanutallah. Chisti was brought back to Ajmer late on Thursday night and produced in court today.

The SP said that it would be only possible to pass on more information after the police interrogates Gauhar Chisti. Efforts are being made to establish whether Chisti has links with the PFI, said SP Chuna Ram.

Chishti also reportedly met one of the murderers of The Udaipur Hindu tailor Kanhaiya Lal. The Pakistan connection of the arrested accused Gauhar Chishti has also come to light. He was in regular touch with some people from Pakistan’s radical organization Dawat-e-Islami. This has come to light during the NIA probe of the Kanhaiya Lal murder case in Udaipur, and the Rajasthan ATS probe of the provocative sloganeering in Ajmer.

Gauhar Chishti is Khadim of the Ajmer dargah and he made provocative speeches and raised slogans outside the Ajmer Dargah to behead those who insult Prophet Mohammad. After that, he left Ajmer and was absconding since June 23.

It is notable that Gauhar Chishti was also arrested by the police two years ago for making a video of the CRPF camp, though he was let off at that time with a mere warning.

Karnataka: Private school takes kids to mosque on the eve of Bakrid, Hindu groups launch protest

On the eve of Bakrid, a private school in Karnataka took its children on a trip to a dargah and a mosque in Gundlupet city in the Chamarajanagar district. Following this tour, all Hindu groups in the state condemned the school’s authorities on Thursday for taking pupils on the visit.

On July 8, staff from Young Scholar School took UKG students to Terakanambi’s dargah and mosque. The children were allegedly made to worship in the mosque and given a discourse by a religious leader at the dargah, which sparked a public outcry against the school administration, according to accounts.

The Hindu Jagarana Vedike has brought up the matter with the education department and filed a complaint in this respect, strongly opposing the visit of students to a mosque, where a Muslim cleric preached them religious discourse. 

Following the uproar over the matter, the school administration apologised and promised to penalize the guilty teachers. 

Officials from the department of education claim that the teachers had notified parents about the excursion. The administration of the school expressed regret for the event and was told not to take students anywhere without first notifying the education department.

Mehbooba Mufti’s sister Rubaiya Sayeed identifies terrorist Yasin Malik and 3 others as abductors in her 1989 kidnapping case

Mehbooba Mufti’s sister Rubaiya Sayeed has identified JKLF terrorist Yasin Malik as one of the abductors in her kidnapping in 1989. Rubaiya Sayeed identified four persons connected with the case in a TADA court in Jammu today, which included Malik.

Rubaiya Sayeed is the daughter of Mufti Mohammad Sayeed, who was the union home minister in the VP Singh government when she was kidnapped by the terrorists. She was then released after other terrorists were released in her exchange.

Advocates who attended the hearing confirmed that Sayeed recorded statement in the court today, and she was able to identify everyone on the basis of photographs that were made available to her during the investigation by the CBI.

CBI lawyer Monica Kohli informed that Rubaiya has identified Yasin Malik and three others, and the next date of hearing has been fixed on 23rd August.

Confirming the development, PDP spokesperson and advocate Anil Sethi said, “She has identified Yasin Malik. She has identified all the abductors. Yes. I cannot reveal much because proceedings are in camera. Next hearing is on the 23rd. She has been asked to be present, depending on the availability of Yasin Malik. She has stood by her statement earlier made to the CBI.”

In January 2021, the TADA court had ordered to frame charges against Malik and nine others in the kidnapping case, over 30 years after the crime. Rubaiya Sayeed was summoned by the TADA court in her own kidnapping case to record her statement. Yasin Malik, who has been sentenced to life imprisonment in a terror funding case, had also been summoned by the court.

On Wednesday, Malik appeared for the hearing through video conferencing. During the hearing, he requested the court for physical appearance for the nest hearing. TADA court is hearing two cases against him, the Rubaiya abduction case and the case of murder of four Indian Air Force officials.

Rubaiya Sayeed was kidnapped by the Jammu Kashmir Liberation Front on December 8,1989. JKLF was led by Yasin Malik at that time. JKLF had kidnapped her on gunpoint demanding the release of five of its members from jail. 23-year-old Rubaiya was working as a medical intern at Lal Ded Memorial Women’s Hospital at that time.

In a controversial decision, the Farooq Abdullah led Jammu and Kashmir government at that time had agreed to the demands and had released the jailed terrorists. While Mufti Mohammad Sayeed’s other daughter Mehbooba Mufti joined active politics and went on to become the chief minister of the state of Jammu and Kashmir, Rubaiya Sayeed had been out of limelight after her release by the kidnappers on 13 December 1989.

The kidnapping and the subsequent release of five terrorists by the government was a landmark event in the history of violence in Kashmir, as it had set the stage for heightened terror and separatist activists in the region. Many people believe that had the government acted tough, terrorism would not have flourished so much in the state. It is notable that Farooq Abdullah had claimed he was threatened by the central govt with dismissal if the jailed militants were not released in exchange of the union home minister’s daughter.

‘We are on this earth to reproduce’: 76-year-old father of Tesla CEO Elon Musk opens up about having a ‘secret’ second child with his 35-years-old stepdaughter

Errol musk, the 75-year-old father of Tesla CEO Elon Musk has admitted to having a second child with his 35-year-old stepdaughter Jana Bezuidenhout in 2019. Speaking to The Sun about his ‘secret’ second child, who is now three years old, the billionaire‘s father exclaimed that “the only thing we are on Earth for is to reproduce.”

He further admitted how the child was ‘not planned’ and he likely impregnated Bezuidenhout, who he raised since she was 4 years old, during the year-and-a-half they were living together following the birth of their son Rushi.

He said, “I haven’t checked her DNA. But she looks just like my other daughters. She looks like Rose and Tosca mixed up. She looks exactly like Rushi, and she behaves like him. So it’s pretty obvious, you know,” Errol Musk told the media house.

The South African engineer further revealed that he and his stepdaughter Jana Bezuidenhout are no longer living together, the reason being that he realised that the 42 years of age gap would be a little too much. He believes that even though it is going to be nice, the gap is going to show itself.

Errol further said he was 45 when he married Jana’s mother who at the time was only 25. “She was probably one of the best looking women I’ve ever seen in my life,” he added.

According to reports, Errol married Heide Bezuidenhout in 1979 after divorcing Elon’s mother Maye Haldeman Musk. Jana Bezuidenhout is Heide’s daughter. Errol and Heide are parents to two biological children, but he also played a role in raising Jana, who was only 4 when he became her stepfather. After 18 years, Errol and Heide eventually got divorced.

This new ‘secret’ child is Errol Musk’s second child with his stepdaughter Jana Bezuidenhout, the first being their son ‘Rushi’. Errol Musk has a total of 7 children including the Tesla and SpaceX founder. If reports are to be believed it was the birth of Rushi in 2017 that had gone on to become the reason for the fallout between Elon and Errol Musk.

The Musk family were in “shock” when they found out that Bezuidenhout is pregnant with Errol Musk’s child, the report added. “They still don’t like it…they still feel a bit creepy, because she’s their sister. Their half-sister,” said Errol when asked about Elon and his brother’s reaction to the pregnancy news.

This news came days after it was revealed that Elon Musk had twin babies with Shivon Zilis, a top executive at his start-up Neuralink, in November 2021. A month after the birth of his twins, Musk had his second child with Canadian singer Grimes in December 2021 via a surrogate mother.

With the birth of his three children last year, his first child with Grimes, and his triplets and the other set of twins with his first wife Justine Wilson, Musk now has a total of nine children.

Uttar Pradesh: Gunshots amidst Friday prayers, elderly man killed in a mosque in Bulandshahar, family accuses one Sarfaraz

In Bulandshahar in Uttar Pradesh, armed miscreants barged inside a mosque on Friday 15th July 2022 in the morning and brutally murdered an elderly man who had just come there to offer prayers. This sensational incident pushed the whole area into a panic. The burqa-clad killers entered the mosque and opened fire inside the mosque premises to kill the deceased elderly person. It is being said that the murder took place due to an old rivalry.

According to a report by Amar Ujala, Idris (age 65, son of Abdul Gaffoor) lived in the Sheikh Pain mohalla which falls under the Khurjanagar police station of Bulandshahar. Idris had an old dispute with some people living in the same mohalla. Idris had also registered a case against those people. On Friday, July 15, at around 5 am, Idris went to pray at the mosque. Five-six other people had also arrived at the mosque at that time. Spotting the opportunity, one of them fired shots at Idris, killing him.

One bullet hit Idris in the chest and one in his right hand. Idris bled a lot as he remained fallen in the mosque for some time. Hearing the sound of firing, all the people who were present in the mosque had fled. It is notable that Idris had a business in iron and steel works in Bulandshahar. Idris’ son Aas Mohammed has alleged that his father was killed due to old enmity. The police have sent the body for postmortem.

District Magistrate of BulandshaharChandra Prakash Singh and SSP Shlok Kumar rushed to the spot as soon as they came to know about the murder. The police reached the spot and started an investigation. SSP Shlok Kumar said, “A man named Idris went to pray in a mosque and was murdered there. The family has accused a person named Sarfaraz who lives in the same locality in Bulandshahar. Further action in the case is in progress.”

He further said, “In the primary investigation we knew that this murder was done due to old enmity. But we are also checking for other angles in this incident. We are checking the CCTV footage near the mosque for further investigation. The accused in this case will soon be arrested.”

UP: Sundarkand recital in Lulu Mall cancelled after management apologises for allowing namaz prayers; complaint filed against namazis

Akhil Bharatiya Hindu Mahasabha has cancelled its Sundarkand recital in the Lulu mall in Lucknow after the management of the mall apologized for the Namaz incident that took place in the mall. Days after its inauguration, the Lulu mall of Lucknow – the biggest one in Uttar Pradesh was embroiled in a conspiracy as a few people offered Namaz inside the mall.

In response to the incident, Akhil Bharatiya Hindu Mahasabha declared that it will hold a Sundarkand recital inside the mall. The Hindu organization avoided the preplanned recital after the apology. The video of unidentified people offering Namaz inside the Lulu mall went viral on 12th July 2022.

Shishir Chaturvedi, the spokesperson of the Akhil Bharatiya Hindu Mahasabha said that Lulu mall management has apologized for the Namaz row and a case has also been registered on their behalf against the unidentified accused in this matter; therefore, the Sundarkand recital program which was scheduled for today is being postponed.

It is notable that the Akhil Bharatiya Hindu Mahasabha had planned to recite Sundarkand inside the Lulu mall on the 15th of July 2022 at 6 pm. The Hindu Mahasabha received support from various saints in Ayodhya. Hundreds of the Hindu Mahasabha members were expected to recite the Sundarkand at the very place in the mall where the Namaz was offered as seen in the viral video.

On 14th July 2022, some members of the Hindu organizations hosted symbolic protests at the gates of the mall. One of the protesters said, “Today we are symbolically sitting at the gate of the mall. Sundarkand will be recited here tomorrow. Lulu Mall is a hub of love jihad. They get the lands at a government discount. The Yogi government has banned prayers in public places. Yet there was prayer here which we are opposing. We are not going inside following the police order. We have lodged a complaint in the police station against those who offer prayers.”

Even after postponing the Sundarkand recital program inside the mall, the police have placed Shishir Chaturvedi under house arrest at his home in the Lalbag area. On Wednesday, as the video of Namaz in the mall went viral, Shishir Chaturvedi warned that if anyone offers Namaz inside the Lulu mall again, Sundarkand recital will take place in the mall.

Complaint filed against unknown persons for offering namaz inside the mall without seeking prior permission

On the other hand, Sibtain Hussain – the public relations officer of the Lulu mall – registered a complaint in the Sushant Golf City police station against unidentified persons for illegally offering Namaz within the Lulu mall premises without any prior permission. He alleged in the complaint that a video of this Namaz went viral on social media.

The investigations revealed that the video is from the same Lulu mall in Lucknow. The public relations officer of the mall Sibtain Hussain told police that no employee or officer of the mall management was involved in the Namaz offered in the mall. The police have registered a case against the unidentified persons in this regard.

Ajay Pratap Singh, Police Station Incharge, Sushant Golf City, Lucknow said, “One Shishir Chaturvedi from Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha has lodged a complaint regarding the reading of namaz at Lulu Mall. Appropriate action will be taken after the investigation. FIR registered at Sushant Golf City Police Station on a complaint by Lulu Mall management. IPC Sections 153A, 295A, 341, and others are invoked in the FIR.”

It is notable that the Lulu Mall is the largest mall in the state and chief minister Yogi Adityanath inaugurated it on July 10. Samir Verma, General Manager, Lulu Mall Lucknow, said about the controversy, “We do not allow any organized religious event or prayer here. We respect all religions. We train our floor and security staff to monitor such activities.”

Madhya Pradesh: Burqa-clad woman attacks on-duty traffic policeman in Indore, accomplice Sohail joins her, both detained

On Thursday, the Madhya Pradesh Police arrested a man and a woman who assaulted an on-duty traffic policeman at the Bhamori crossroad in Indore, Madhya Pradesh. The traffic policeman stopped the woman and her accomplice who were violating the traffic rules while riding the bike. The duo then attacked the officer, the video of which went viral over social media.

According to the reports, the man who accompanied the burqa-clad woman has been identified as Sohail. The incident happened on Thursday evening when a traffic policeman named Ranjit Singh was on duty at the Bhamori crossroad in Indore. He saw two persons incorrectly driving the vehicle and stopped them for violating the traffic rules. The duo then suddenly started brawling against the officer, the video of which was recorded and shared over the internet.

The woman wearing a burqa in the video can be clearly seen attacking the police officer while her accomplice, Sohail, is seen supporting her in the attack. The policeman meanwhile is seen averting the attack, but the burwa-clad woman keeps assaulting the policeman repeatedly. As people gathered to witness the incident, videos were shot and soon went viral on social media.

Reportedly, Singh informed about the incident to his senior officers who registered a complaint against the woman and her male friend named Sohail for attacking the policeman. Traffic DCP Basant Kol also confirmed the incident and stated that the accused Sohail already has three cases registered in his name. The current case has been lodged at the Vijaynagar Police station and both the accused have been detained by the Police.

Hamid Ansari says he did not invite Nusrat Mirza to any conference after the event organiser said ex-VP had desired Pak journalist’s presence

Former Vice President Hamid Ansari issued a fresh statement reiterating his earlier stand that he never knew or invited the Pakistan journalist Nusrat Mirza, after Dr Adish Aggarwala, the event organiser, made grave allegations against him and the Congress party, alleging that the former VP had desired that Nusrat Mirza be invited to the conference.

“The former vice president of India stands by his earlier statement that he never knew or invited the Pakistan journalist Nusrat Mirza to any conference, including the 2010 conference mentioned by Nusrat Mirza or the 2009 conference on terrorism or on any other occasion,” the new statement issued by the officer of the former vice president of India read.

Event organiser rubbishes ex-VP Hamid Ansari’s defence over Pakistani journalist Nusrat Mirza controversy

In a press release on Thursday (July 14), Aggarwala stated that the said event was held between December 11-12 in 2010 at Vigyan Bhawan in New Delhi, as per the press release.

“The then Vice-President Hamid Ansari had attended the conference but Nusrat Mirza was neither an invitee nor had he attended it. Even Nusrat Mirza has not referred to this conference in his interview,” he emphasised.

“Mr Ashok Dewan who at that time was serving as Director, Vice-President Secretariat had informed me that the Vice-President has desired that Pakistani journalist Mr Nusrat Mirza be invited to the Conference. However, we could not accede to the request since Mr Mirza was from Pakistan media and we had not invited judges or lawyers from Pakistan,” the statement had read.

According to Dr Adish Aggarwala, a dismayed Hamid Ansari communicated to Dewan that he would attend the seminar for only 20 minutes. This was despite the fact that the ex-Vice President had initially agreed to spend an hour at the event.

“Some Congress leaders are trying to mask the alleged meeting of Mr Hamid Ansari with Nusrat Mirza by making insinuations and veiled statements on social media that Mr Nusrat Mirza had attended the conference organized by me”, he added.

“It appears that Mr Hamid Ansari and Mr Jairam Ramesh chose not to disclose about the Jama Masjid United Forum’s Conference in order to mislead government agencies and the public. Possibly, they felt it appropriate to take shelter behind the Jurists’ Conference so that Mr Ansari receives a clean chit on scrutiny of records of the said Conference,” Dr Adish Aggarwala said.

Hamid Ansari saga and his fallible defence

On July 10, Pakistani Journalist and YouTuber Shakil Chaudhary published an interview with Pakistani Journalist Nusrat Mirza who claimed he spied on India and handed over the information he had gathered during his visits to India between 2005 to 2011.

He said in 2010, he was invited to a seminar on terrorism by then-Vice President Hamid Ansari. He said, “Though I agree I am not an expert, but we are Mughals. We have ruled India for centuries. I understand their culture. I know about their weaknesses. But the problem is the experience I gathered about India is not being used due to lack of good leadership in Pakistan.” 

During his 2011 visit to India, Mirza said he had met The Milli Gazette’s publisher Zafarul Islam Khan. In his defence, Ansari said that falsehood was unleashed on him by the controversy.

Exclusive: ‘Dalit’ Christian employee of Loyola College alleges caste discrimination, sexual harassment and more, names principal in scandal

Founded in 1925 by a French Jesuit priest, Loyola College is a Christian university, run by the Society of Jesus in Chennai, Tamil Nadu. On its website, Loyola College says that its core values include, “social responsibility, social justice and God quotient”. However, if certain employees of the college are to be believed, Loyola College upholds anything but the core values they claim to espouse. Several Christians belonging to the SC/ST category have come forward, accusing the University of caste oppression, discrimination and worse.

One such case that OpIndia covered was that of Josephine Jeyashanthi, an ordinary Christian middle-class woman, who dedicated her life to shaping the careers of her students and bringing honour to the prestigious Loyola College in Chennai until she was fired by the college administration. Josephine has been fighting a battle for the past 13 years, after she was fired from her job, without her dues being cleared, simply because she raised her voice against the rampant sexual harassment she was subjected to at the hands of her superiors who work at Loyola College.

In 2019, the Madras High Court passed a judgement in her favour, however, the college did paltry little to punish those who harassed her sexually. At the time we write the article, she was neither paid her dues, running in lakhs nor the 59 lakh compensation that she was awarded by the High Court. Her perpetrator was one Dr S Antony Rajarajan (referred to as S A Rajarajan) who became the head of the Tamil Department in the year 2008.

“You are lying dry and bare without a husband, better succumb to my desire” is what he used to tell me. In front of many others he said, There is a hole in your body, I know how to plug it. That’s the kind of obscenity I had to endure”, Josephine lamented, furthering that because she refrained from his advances, the accused filed bogus complaints with management against her, claiming that she wasn’t doing her job properly and wasn’t taking classes on a regular basis. “He created a hostile work environment for me”, said the desolate lecturer while talking to OpIndia last year.

Soon after the OpIndia article, the NCW had taken cognisance of Josephine’s plight and asked the administration (Chairman Provincial) to ensure due compliance of the Madras High Court verdict.

The list of offences committed by Loyola College in Josephine Jeyashanthi’s case

  • Rajarajan began harassing Josephine Jeyashanthi in 2008 when he joined as HOD in the college’s Tamil Department and continued until Josephine was arbitrarily fired.
  • The internal complaints body only took cognisance of Josephine’s accusation in December 2012. (The Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redress) Act 2013 states that an investigation into the complaint must be completed within 90 days).
  • The Vishaka Guideline mandates that the grievance be addressed in a time-bound manner. However, it took 8 months to ‘censure’ the accused. Also, it took the college 6 years to submit the report to the court.
  • The then Secretary Rev Fr M. Albert Williams SJ and the then Principal Rev Fr G Joseph Antonysamy SJ lied to the police.
  • Most importantly, the prime accused Antony Rajarajan was not only protected by the Loyola College management but was also given privileges like superannuation with salary, while the victim was further victimised and terminated from the job without any sort of explanation and without even settling payments. 

Josephine, however, is not the only one who was harassed sexually or thrown out of her job without her dues being cleared and without being given a clear reason as to why they are being terminated (except that it was evident that the termination had everything to do with her speaking up against her superiors who harassed her sexually).

Several individuals have come forward recently to claim that their employment was terminated simply because they were ‘Dalit Christians’ and the college discriminated against them due to their caste. They have also alleged a nexus between the administration, including the principle of Loyola College and the Alumni group to persecute those who dare to speak up. According to them, this entire campaign of discrimination is being run in tandem and the complicity of the higher-ups in the Loyola College administration makes it almost impossible to find justice.

Lawrence D Cruz – Abused for being a “Dalit” Christian, made to do menial tasks, terminated without notice and allegedly sexually abused by superiors at Loyola College

Lawrence D’Cruz, a former student of Loyola College, started working at the university in October 2013. On the 23rd of April 2022, Lawrence was terminated by the college for reasons, that he says are fabricated. According to Lawrence, he was constantly discriminated against, made to do menial jobs, abused for being a “Dalit” and sexually harassed. It was when he spoke up against the injustice, the college, according to him, concocted charges and terminated his employment. Lawrence was pursuing his MBA, but he could not complete the course, he said while talking to OpIndia, due to the “indifference by Reverend Father Thomas Amirtham, the Principal of Loyola College. Father Thomas Amirthan was also the former Director of the Alumni Association, of which Lawrence was a part and was working for.

In 2013, Lawrence joined as a Junior Assistant. He joined first under Father Xavier Alphonse from the year 2013 to 2015. From the year 2015 to 2016, Lawrence worked under Father Joseph Antony Samy. After that, Lawrence started working with Father Thomas Amirthan, who took over the Alumni Association as the Director of the association at the time in 2016.

Lawrence’s job, as the junior assistant working at the Alumni Association, was to forward recommendations from the Alumni Association to the College authorities. In the course of his job, Lawrence says, he noticed misappropriation and irregularities for which, while talking to OpIndia, he directly accused Father Thomas Amirthan.

In the Alumni Association, several members of the Alumni and their offspring donate money. While Lawrence was working with Father Thomas, he says he noticed him collect money by way of cash. At the time, Lawrence felt like it was his duty to keep the Director informed of the appropriate procedures that need to be followed while collecting donations and sponsorships through the Alumni Association. At this point, Lawrence says that he told Father Thomas Amirthan that the donations and sponsorships are not meant to be collected in cash, but by way of cheques, made out in the name of the Director of the Alumni Association of in the name of the Principal of Loyola College.

Shockingly, according to Lawrence, Father Thomas started abusing him for his caste at this point. “You are a lowborn and you should learn how to behave like one”, Father Thomas allegedly to Lawrence. After the abuse that Lawrence faced, he says that he stopped bringing up the issue with Father Thomas and worked, putting his head down.

Lawrence then tells OpIndia that the funds of the Alumni association were being misused. Naming the Secretary of the Alumni Association, Mr Balamurugan Janarthanan, Lawrence said that Father Thomas and Balamurugan Janarthanan were misappropriating Alumni funds. As the PA, it was Lawrence’s job to ensure that the cheques were deposited on time and the payments made, however, he says that the two of them forced him to reroute the cheques elsewhere. Uncomfortable with being forced to commit illegality, Lawrence brought up the issue with the Alumni’s top bosses, only to be abused again. He was told that as a “lowborn and untouchable person”, he was only fir to “work as a sweeper”, and therefore, he should keep quiet and look the other way. He was also threatened, saying that they know how to “take care of him” if he dared to speak up.

It was after this, Lawrence says, that the saga of discrimination started. Every month, Lawrence used to get Rs 500 as a telephone allowance, since he had to call several Alumni members. The allowance was stopped for Lawrence, however, he was made to sign the vouchers. His leaves were cut down and on Sundays, he was made to do menial tasks, cleaning the premises. Even on government holidays, Lawrence would not be spared. According to him, while the cleaning staff was on leave, Lawrence was forced to work because of his caste and as a punishment for speaking up his work hours were extended till 8 PM (which used to be till 5 PM) simply to mentally torture him.

Further, Lawrence was forced to eat outside of the Alumni office because they did not think he was “suitable” to eat with them. “One by one, they took away all the facilities from me because they wanted me to resign from the job. But I kept taking the blows because I come from a financially backward background and have two sisters I need to take care of. I am the only son in the family”, Lawrence said talking to OpIndia.

“Leave your slippers outside”, Lawrence was told, because he should not be wearing footwear in front of high born Christians.

In June 2018, things took a turn for the worse. Lawrence met with an accident at that time. After 2 months, when he returned to his job, he was told that there was no work for him and he should find a job elsewhere.

Shocked, Lawrence met the Secretary of Loyola College, Rev. Dr D. Selvanayagam. Rev. Dr D. Selvanayagam told Lawrence that someone else had been employed in his position, therefore, nothing can be done and he should find a job elsewhere. In the following weeks, Lawrence and his family almost fell to the feet of the administration, trying to save his job, which he seemed to lose for no apparent reason. Finally, Rev. Dr. D. Selvanayagam told Lawrence that there is an attendant job vacancy at the Library and he should start working there.

“Because of my family situation, I did not say anything and took the job. I went to the Library to collect students’ bags and usher them inside with the token. I joined in 2018 and I was there, doing this job, till 2019. My work timing was 11:30 AM to 8 PM because even though the college timing ends at 6:30 PM, according to UGC rules, we need to keep the library open till 8 PM”, Lawrence said.

But after 6:30 PM is when the college started deliberately persecuting him. He was told that after 6:30 PM, he would have to clean and sweep the Library. Lawrence says he tried to explain that sweeping, cleaning and washing was not his job, however, Mr Parthiban – Librarian and Fr. Leonard – Director of Library both instructed Lawrence to submit his resignation letter to the Secretary of Loyola College and leave the campus if the assigned work was not acceptable to him.

Between 2018 and June 2019, Lawrence swallowed the bitter pill and worked as per instructions in this job profile because he had a family to feed, he says.

In 2019, things were about to get worse for Lawrence than they already were.

Father Thomas Amirthan was promoted as the Principal of Loyola College. If one recalls, it was Father Thomas who was allegedly misappropriating funds from the Alumni Association and it was after that, that the saga of torture started.

“In 2019, Mr Parthiban and Father Leonard, at the behest of Father Thomas Amirthan, forced me to do menial work and wash the restroom”, says Lawrence. “I was fully against this. I said I will not clean the washroom under any circumstances. I had a fight with the Library authorities and they sent an email complaining about me directly to Father Thomas. Father Thomas then threatened me, saying that if you can’t do whatever work you are being assigned, you will be removed from the college. He also said that he will confiscate my certificates and that I will not be able to find work anywhere in my life. I was asked to either clean the washroom or resign, failing which, I would be fired and my life made miserable”, he added.

Lawrence further said that in October 2019, Father Thomas forced him to even sign an apology letter for dereliction of duty when he had refused to clean the toilet. “Because of my family situation, I again succumbed and wrote the apology letter”, Lawrence said.

Another horrific tale of torture: Lawrence D Cruz was sexually tortured from 2018 to 2019

While in 2019, Lawrence signed the apology letter and submitted it to the Principal, there was another episode of torture that lasted for an entire year. From 2018 to 2019, Lawrence D’Cruz was sexually tortured by one Mr Gnanaprakasam, who was also the Library staff at Loyola College. Lawrence says that he complained orally to Father Leonard, who refused to do anything. When his oral complaint was met with apathy, Lawrence wrote an official complaint to the father, detailing how he was sexually harassed. Lawrence says that along with the complaint, he also handed over some video proof of the sexual abuse that he suffered.

The complaint, he says, was brushed under the carpet. Father Leonard apparently deleted all the videos that Lawrence had handed over to him and told him to not pursue the matter any further.

According to Lawrence, following is the complaint he tried to place on record on the 10th of April 2019 but was turned away by Father Leonard. OpIndia has a copy of the handwritten complaint by Leonard, the text of which is produced below:

Dear Rev.Fr.Leonard, S.J.,

Greetings!

In spite of complaining to our librarian Dr. Parthiban several times regarding Mr. Gnanaprakasam sexually harassing me, no action has been taken against him. I think it is because, he is the relative of Mrs. Susana Felicia. As per your instruction I am working in the library bag counter from 11.30am to 6.30pm and then from 6.30pm to 8.00 pm inside the library doing cleaning work. I have been doing my duties and responsibilities to the best of my abilities, as per your instruction at all your aspects.

Kindly find the below illustrations:

i. Some times between 5.00pm to 6.00pm, while I am alone in the bag counter section, he forced me to go to inside the bag counter room, because I am seated only outside of the bag counter room.

ii. After 6.30pm while working inside the library, he volunterly comes and talks to me and gives me work.

iii. On Christmas time, while going to the restroom he grabbed me from behind and try to kiss me.

iv. He always makes sexual jokes while talking to me.

v. He calls me regularly eventhough I block his calls.

vi. Also he showed me few porn videos while other staffs were on leave.

In front of other staffs his behaviour is very normal without any doubt. The above incidents are really disturbing and it’s severally affecting my mind, I am not able to concentrate in my work as well my family. He also threatened to terminate me from my job through his relative Mrs. Susana Felicia if I told anyone. Hence I request you to kindly intervene in this matter and help me the earliest and do the needful and oblige.

In December 2019, Lawrence says he was summoned by the Principal Father Thomas and Rev. Dr D. Selvanayagam. During the meeting, Lawrence claims he was threatened yet again, saying that he either does the task assigned and keeps quiet, or he can quit the job. He was further told that if she does do as told, they know methods that can be deployed against him to ‘make him resign’.

The saga continued as is, until the 9th of December 2021, when Lawrence shot an email to several individuals in the Loyola College administration detailing his ordeal.

Days after Lawrence complains over email, a mysterious sexual harassment complaint is filed against him

After his emails, on the 10th January 2022, two women who worked in the Library complained against Lawrence, accusing him of sexual harassment. Lawrence believes that these complaints were fake. He says that they were much older and he always treated them as sisters.

They claimed that Lawrence used to follow them consistently, knock incessantly at the bathroom door, sing songs and harass them.

After the complaint, an inquiry was launched against Lawrence and it was finally on the 23rd of April, that he was terminated from his job. When terminated, Lawrence says that he pleaded with Father Thomas and Dr D. Selvanayakam saying that the findings are incorrect. He told them, according to Lawrence, that the Library has CCTV coverage and if he was wrong, there would be some evidence of wrong-doing.

Interestingly, Lawrence handed over a recorded conversation between him and a member of the internal inquiry team. In that conversation, Lawrence was repeatedly told that he needs to be careful since there are forces trying to “set him up”.

A transcript of the conversation is produced below:

Mr. A. Gnanaraj: I am warning you in advance because I am in the commission, they are trying to corner you in a different way.

Mr. A. Gnanaraj: I am not supposed to tell you all this.

Mr. A. Gnanaraj: You have a good reputation, but they are trying to malign you.

Lawrence: They are trying to set me up rite?

Mr. A. Gnanaraj: Yes

Mr. A. Gnanaraj: I was unable to sleep last night…a sister who is on the committee also wondered how will Lawrence repeatedly go behind these women? Won’t he have any other work to do? He’s educated, a very good boy, and has a lot of friends, it’s impossible for him to do all this. He could be in some trouble. So we need to investigate what it is.

Mr. A. Gnanaraj: Please consult a lawyer and respond to the show-cause notice, because they have planned to terminate you from your job. ‘YOU MUST BE VERY CAREFUL’

Pray to St. Antony and I will also pray for you.

In his email dated 5th March 2022, Lawrence claims that the accusations against him are fake and the problems started for him after he flagged several irregularities in the Alumni Association.

A saga of unanswered emails and withheld certificates

Lawrence wrote several emails to the Loyola College administration over the months. One such email was written on 28th February 2022 as a reminder of the previous emails sent. In this, he detailed his ordeal, however, according to Lawrence, he got no response from the college.

In this particular email, he also detailed all the other Christian employees who have been terminated without cause, apparently, simply because they were “lower caste”.

Interestingly, Lawrence also wrote an email on the 24th of March 2022 flagging the confiscation of his original academic certificates. In the email, he writes that he has requested several times that his documents and certificates be given back to him, however, the College was not obliging. He writes that it is against UGC and Madras University norms to collect original certificates and Loyola College has not only collected them but was using these certificates to threaten employees, including Lawrence.

Lawrence says that it was on 15th June that he got a message to collect his original certificate once word got out that the media may pick his story up.

It is being alleged by Lawrence that he is not the only one who has gone through this ordeal at Loyola College. He says there are over 25 employees who have been harassed with fake complaints and fired, simply because they were “lower caste Christians”. There is a similar pattern that is followed in all of those cases. Essentially, these employees are hounded with fake complaints and then, their employment is terminated. Often, their original certificates are also not returned. The victims that OpIndia spoke to confirmed that their original certificates also have not been returned. In fact, they also confirmed that the Alumni Association and its office were being used to hound “lower caste Christians” out of the college with the tacit complicity of the Principal, Father Thomas.

OpIndia spoke to several such victims. One such victim was one J Buela, who also worked at Loyola College. Buela was working as an Assistant Professor for five years at the ‘School of Service Learning’ at Loyola College. She told OpIndia that she was fired from her job on the 31st of August 2021 without any prior intimation. When she had asked the Secretary of the college Rev. Dr D. Selvanayagam, S.J. for the reason for the termination, she was informed that her contract period with the college was over, however, she says that no such condition was present in her appointment letter. She too, placed the blame of the hounding of “lower caste Christians” at the doorstep of Fr. Selvanayagam S.J and Rev Dr A. Thomas, SJ.

OpIndia would be exploring the stories of these victims, including J Buela in the following articles.

Note: OpIndia wrote emails to most of the individuals mentioned in this article, including Father Thomas, however, we have failed to get a response from any of the parties concerned. We would be pursuing responses from the concerned people further and include an addendum if any of them choose to respond.

Delhi Court gives sermons to Hindus while granting bail to Zubair, after SC judges had blamed Nupur Sharma for beheading of Kanhaiya Lal

The Patiala House Court in Delhi today granted bail to Alt News cofounder Mohammad Zubair in a case filled for allegedly hurting Hindu sentiments through a tweet some years ago. However, the comments made by the court in the bail order shows the huge difference how the judicial system treats similar complaints by Hindus and Muslims. The court today said that Hindus must be tolerant, a view not expressed by the Supreme Court just weeks ago in a similar case.

While the case against Zubair is regarding a social media post defaming Hinduism, the court brought his anti-government views in the matter, implying that he has been arrested for his political stand, not for the Hinduphobic posts. “The voice of dissent is necessary for healthy democracy. Therefore, merely for the criticism of any political parties it is not justified to invoke section 153A and 295A IPC,” a shocking statement because no criticism of any political party has been invoked in the FIR against Zubair.

The court termed the case as a freedom of speech case, it said that “free speech is the proper foundation of a democratic society.” With this, the court virtually ruled that defamation of Hinduism comes under free speech, even when a trial court is yet to decide whether Zubair’s posts defamed Hinduism or not. While it was only a bail hearing, the Patiala House Court gave the verdict in the merit of the case itself by saying that it is a matter of freedom of speech.

Most shocking was the court’s comment on Hinduism, as the court gave the sermon that Hindus must be ‘tolerant’ and should not object to others insulting Hindu gods and should not use the legal recourse against such insults. The court said, “Hindu religion is one of the oldest religion and most tolerant. The followers of the Hindu religion are also tolerant. Hindu religion is so tolerant that followers proudly names institution/organization/facilities in the name of their Holy God or Goddess.”

Rejecting the allegation against Zubair, the court further said that he committed no offence as Hindus use Gods of Hindus to name persons, organisations etc, and that is considered acceptable. “Naming of an Institute, Facility or Organization or child in the name of Hindu Deity on the face of it, is not violative of Section 153A and 295A IPC unless the same is done with malice/guilty intention,” the court said, virtually ruling that Zubair’s ‘Honeymoon hotel’ tweet was not done with malice, and he is not guilty.

However, it is notable that there is no god named Honeymoon in Hinduism, and the image that Zubair had posted showed the name Hanuman changed to Honeymoon. Although the image was taken from an old Hindi movie, the prosecution has argued that the intent of the comedy movie and the post by Zubair were not same. The FIR says that the words and the picture used by Zubair against a particular religious community were highly provocative and more than sufficient to incite feeling of hatred amongst people which can be detrimental for maintenance of public tranquillity in the society.

While an appropriate court will determine whether Zubair insulted Hinduism or not after a due trial, the comments on Hinduism by the Patiala House Court comes in stark contrast of what the Supreme Court had commented on former BJP spokesperson Nupur Sharma. The court had virtually held her guilty of insulting Islam and had justified violence by Islamists in response to her comments on Prophet Mohammad.

As multiple FIRs have been filed against Nupur Sharma in numerous police stations in several states, she had approached the supreme court to club all the FIRs and transfer them to Delhi. This a standard legal benefit usually granted when multiple FIRs are filed in the same case, and the Supreme Court itself has ruled in a landmark verdict that multiple FIRs can’t be registered for the same offence.

But not only the Supreme Court bench of Justice Surya Kant and Justice JB Pardiwala rejected this simple plea, they had gone on the make unprecedented comments against the petitioner on matters which were not even subject of the plea. While Nupur Sharma had mentioned some facts which are mentioned in Islamic texts and have been confirmed by several Islamic clerics, the court had blamed her ‘loose tongue’ for the violence by Islamists across the country, including the murder of Kanhaiya Lal in Udaipur and Umesh Kolhe in Amaravati.

The Supreme Court had said that Nupur Sharma has set the entire country on fire and she should apologise to the whole country. Blaming Nupur Sharma for the chaos unleashed by the Islamists and the regressive ideas that ambiguously declare any criticism of the Islamic prophet as ‘blasphemy’, the apex court of the country had surprisingly ignored the hatred and violence unleashed by Islamists and has instead blamed the woman who had stated merely what is written in Islamic hadiths, and affirmed by Islamic scholars all over the world.

By the comments on Nupur Sharma, the apex court of the country had virtually ruled that any comment on Islam that is considered blasphemy by Islamists is not acceptable, and any person making such person must apologise. The Supreme Court had also justified violence and murders by radical Islamists over alleged ‘blasphemy’, adding fuel to the ‘sar tan se juda’ slogans across the country. The Supreme Court never said that Muslims should be tolerant, motivating them to remain radicals.

But the Patiala House Court thinks differently about Hinduism, by saying that Hindus must be tolerant because they have been tolerant for centuries. The views of both courts essentially reflect the prevalent viewpoint of left-liberal establishment, which is that it is ok to insult Hinduism but is not ok to even make even a factual comment on Islam.