Home Blog Page 3796

Elle had a ‘little’ rant: Who are behind Elle India? Meet its author, Digital Editor, Publisher and a cartoonist angry with them

On October 31, Elle India published an article targeting Hindus for raising their voice against brands that have been targeting Hindu culture and festivals. The Hindu outrage irked the magazine and the author who penned the article to the extent that they tried to make Hindus look like villains for not allowing brands to “run wild with creativity”.

The question here is, can just outrage irk someone so much that they decide to paint Hindus as villains? There must be something deep-rooted in the sense of intellect among the people behind Elle India and that particular report that caused the unrest.

OpIndia decided to dig the profiles of a few people linked to the article, Elle and the illustration they used. First of all, let’s talk about Ruman Baig, the author of the so-called satirical article titled “Politics Of Shades & Silhouettes – India’s Latest Fashion Trend”. Baig has a very limited presence on Twitter, but it is more than enough to reveal her thought process. While doing our own research, we noticed that Vijay Patel, an investigative journalist, has also dug some history on her.

Ruman, who has now locked her profile, does not tweet much, but she loves retweeting some “intellectuals” and “eminent” journalists on Twitter. One of the notable names among those was Afreen Fatima. In the tweet that Baig had retweeted from August, Fatima had talked in favour of Sharjeel Imam, the same person who had talked about cutting off Assam from the rest of India during anti-CAA protests. This is the same Afreen Fatima who had spewed venom against Hindus and Ram Mandir verdict in the past.

Posts retweeted by Ruman Baig. Source: Twitter.

Another interesting person who she had retweeted was Puneet Sharma, who had blamed Hindus for targeting Muslims in India. In the tweet, he had written that Muslims and Muslim things are like drugs for Hindus. If, for some reason, everything related to Muslims vanished from India, Hindus would have withdrawal symptoms.

The tweets she has liked provides further insight into her ideology.

Sample posts liked by Ruman. Source: Twitter

Now coming to the Digital Editor of Elle, Ainee Nizami Ahmadi. She has also locked her profile since the outrage happened against Elle’s article. Digital Editors are responsible for the content that goes on the digital platform of any brand, in this case, Elle. Again, she has a limited presence on Twitter. However, in December 2020, she has retweeted a post by Aysha Renna where Renna, along with other women, were standing on a vehicle during anti-CAA protests and raising anti-India slogans.

Posts retweeted by Ainee Nizami Ahmedi. Source: Twitter

Under Ahmadi, the illustration on Elle’s Instagram account was posted in which Hindus were seen closing down shutters of FabIndia and other brands. The illustration was created by one Lord_VoldeMaut, a 19-year-old “artist” who often post anti-Hindu content on Twitter and Instagram. Now here is a catch. The “artist” has claimed that Elle… wait for it… STOLE THE ARTWORK! The illustration was allegedly posted without his/her permission on Elle’s Instagram account.

To give Elle some points here, they did give the artist due credit and tagged his account. But their tag backfired for the poor artist as a wave of critics approached him and checked what kind of content he had been posting. Lord_VoldeMaut has deactivated his Twitter account and locked his Instagram account.

Furthermore, it should be noted that Lord_VoldeMaut ran a whole series of contentious posts throughout October in the guise of “#Inktober” which is a hashtag used by artists to publish new work every day in the month of October.

Anti-Hindu illustrations by the same artist. Source: Twitter

In a post that is only available in the form of screenshots on social media, the artist had called out Elle for publishing his artwork without his permission. He alleged after the outrage, Elle deleted the name of the writer from the post but kept his name intact that directed the critics towards him.

An alleged post by the artist where he claimed Elle India used his artwork without permission. Source: Twitter

BTW the artist is back with a changed handle as Comrade_Kira.

The artist has changed his twitter handle to Comrade_Kira

Another person associated with Elle that raised eyebrows is the publisher Arif Ayyub, brother of so-called journalist Rana Ayyub. While he has very little presence on Twitter, he often shares reports and posts about his sister on his Facebook account. While Rana is extremely vocal against the government, it seems like the other Ayyub has toned down his voice on social media but feels free to propagate anti-Hindu material via the magazine.

Screenshot of FB profile of Arif Ayyub. Source: Facebook
Screenshot of FB post of Arif Ayyub where he mentions Rana Ayyub as her sister. Source: Facebook

Meanwhile, Elle India has deleted the controversial cartoon from their social media handle after receiving backlash over the same.

Update: In January 2022, Elle India took to Twitter to inform that Arif Ayyub is no longer associated with the publishing house. As per the tweet, he had resigned in August 2019.

Haryana Govt imposes a blanket ban on firecrackers during Diwali in 14 districts in NCR under section 144

0

The Haryana Disaster Management Authority has placed a blanket ban on all types of firecrackers under Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) across the State’s 14 districts that fall within the NCR during the upcoming Diwali celebrations on November 4. The decision comes a day after the Gurugram district administration had permitted a two-hour window for bursting green crackers in the state.

The office of the Deputy Commissioner of Gurugram posted the official communique issued by the District Magistrate Gurugram on October 31 on its official Twitter handle which specified that there would be a total ban on the sale of or use of all kinds of firecrackers in District Gurugram during the festival season of Diwali, Gurupurab and Kartik Purnima, Christmas eve, New Year eve.  

It read that the ban has been placed keeping in view the covid-19 pandemic through which the State of Haryana is passing. It further added that the winter season is approaching, during which aged children, those with co-morbidities, and others may experience respiratory issues. People frequently burst crackers during the upcoming festival season of Diwali, Gurupurab and Kartik Purnima, Christmas eve, and New Year eve, which might harm the respiratory health of vulnerable groups while also aggravating the health condition of Covid-19 positive people in home isolation.

The order read that the decision was taken in “compliance with the various directions of the National Green Tribunal (NGT) and the Hon’ble Supreme Court”.

“Commissioner of Police, Gurugram shall be responsible for the compliance of the above orders. Any person found guilty of violation of this order shall be prosecuted and punished as per law under section 188 of the Indian Penal”, added the order.

Ahead of Diwali and in view of the coronavirus pandemic, authorities in Gautam Buddh Nagar, Uttar Pradesh, have invoked Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), which prohibits gatherings of four or more individuals in a public location. The ban was put in place on October 31 and will be in effect until November 30.

Jhunjhunu Police in Rajasthan also imposes section 144 during Diwali

Prior to this, Jhunjhunu Police in Rajasthan also imposed section 144 during the upcoming Diwali celebrations. A tweet posted on the social media platform by the verified account of Jhunjhunu Police said that prohibitory orders have been issued under Section 144 of the IPC. The restrictions have been imposed on the orders of District Collector Umar Deen Khan.

Supreme Court refuses a complete ban on firecrackers, sets aside Calcutta HC’s total ban in WB

It may be noted that today, the Supreme Court of India has set aside the order of the Calcutta High Court imposing a complete ban on firecrackers in the state of West Bengal. On October 29, the Calcutta High Court had ordered a complete ban on all kinds of firecrackers throughout the state of West Bengal during the upcoming festivals including Diwali, Kali Puja, Guru Nanak Jayanti, Christmas and New Year’s celebrations. The court had said that only wax or oil-based diyas can be used and banned all firecrackers including green firecrackers which are allowed by the SC and the NGT.

Calling the High Court order ‘extreme’, the apex court said, “we are convinced that Calcutta High Court should have called upon parties to give an explanation before passing such an extreme order.”

The apex court said that there cannot be a complete ban on firecrackers, which it had already said on 29 October in a different case, and asked the authorities to strengthen mechanisms to supervise and implement its orders.

Watch: Pakistani news anchor breaks out into laughter after panellist shows sizes of bananas from Mumbai and Dhaka with hand gestures

A Pakistani news anchor broke into laughter when a panellist described various sizes of bananas in detail on detail using hand gestures. Alveena Agha, an anchor in the News One TV channel from Pakistan, was talking about bananas with her guest Khawaja Naveed, when she burst into laughter after learning that bananas in Mumbai and Dhaka are larger than the bananas found in Pakistan. A video of the clip was shared by Pakistani journalist Nalia Inayat on Twitter.

In the video, panellist Khawaja Naveed is heard saying, ‘If some research and investment is made, then bananas found in Bombay (Mumbai) are this big that if six bananas are kept in a room, then the smell of the bananas spreads in the entire room.’ While saying this, the man also used his wrist to indicate the size of bananas found in Mumbai.

Then the Pakistani banana expert praised the bananas from Dhaka and said, ‘in a similar way, the bananas in Dhaka are this big unlike those found in Sindh,’ again using his wrist to indicate the size of Bangladeshi bananas. According to Khawaja Naveed, the bananas in Sindh were very poor in terms of size.

When ‘banana expert’ Khawaja Naveed was indicating the size of bananas from Mumbai and Dhaka using hand gestures, some other (dirty?) thoughts might have occurred in the mind of Alveena Agha. The apparent ‘thought’ in her mind was strong that she could not stop herself from breaking in laughter on live TV, trying to keep her head down. Continuing with her laughter, the anchor said that the research on bananas is very poor in Pakistan and more development is needed in this field. After that, she asked Khawaja Naveed to clarify to the viewers that he was only talking about the research and development in Pakistan concerning bananas.

Despite the wild laughter by Agha, Naveed kept his cool with a smile, and said, ‘They should do research and bring the bananas from Bombay and Dhaka to Pakistan which would increase their demand and sale.’

India makes a strong claim for inclusion in the Nuclear Supplier Group at the G20 meet, links it with achieving climate goals

On Sunday (October 31), India highlighted that achieving its climate goals is dependent on its inclusion in the Nuclear Suppliers’ Group (NSG) that has been held hostage by China, reported The Times of India. The country emphasised the need for the availability of technology towards meeting the “Common but Differentiated Responsibilities and Respective Capabilities (CBDR-RC)” that were laid down during the G20 meeting on climate action in Italy.

While speaking about the matter, India’s Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal stated, “This is something that will have to be decided in terms of types of technologies that will be available for climate transition. For example, for our technology to be replaced from coal to, maybe, nuclear, we will need large amounts of capital for setting up nuclear power plants, both to replace our current demand, and for our future demand that our development imperative requires. We will need to be a member of the Nuclear Suppliers’ Group for adequate availability of raw material for nuclear supply and several other associated concerns around the cost of power.”

India has taken an ‘assertive stance’ in the face of pressure put down by the developed Western nations on all countries to adopt a net zero emission target. Piyush Goyal informed that the onus lay on developed countries that have borne the fruits of low-cost energy for several years. He added that for developing countries to achieve net zero carbon emission targets, the developed nations have to move faster and make net negative space for them. Goyal emphasised the importance of technological availability for developing nations to reach sustainable climate change goals.

India also put pressure on the developed nations to provide $100 billion annually through 2025 and not later than 2023 to help achieve these goals. It laid emphasis on mobilising capital for supporting green initiatives and sustainable development. In line with PM Modi’s vision to promote sustainable lifestyle choices, Piyush Goyal informed, “For the first time, G20 has identified sustainable and responsible consumption and production, along with the provision of finance and technology as ‘critical enablers’ for achieving climate goals of keeping 1.5 degrees within reach.”

Between 2014 and 2019, India has become a member of all the key anti-nuclear, biological and chemical weapons proliferation groups like the Australia Group, Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR) and the Wassenaar Arrangement (WA) except for Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG), where India’s admission is opposed by China at the behest of Pakistan. NSG rules suggest that a new member can be admitted only if all the members mutually agree. Even if one member opposes, the new member can’t be admitted. China is using this clause to its advantage for stalling India’s admission, where all other members of NSG are positive about India’s admission to the NSG.

2013 bomb blasts in Patna: Four Islamic terrorists sentenced to death, 2 get life imprisonment

0

The special National Investigation Agency (NIA) court Monday, November 1, announced the quantum of punishment for the nine Indian Mujahideen terrorists convicted in the 2013 Patna Gandhi Maidan serial blasts case.

Four of the nine convicts, namely Imtiaz Ansari, Mohammed Mujibullah Ansari, Haider Ali alias ‘Black Beauty’ and Noman Ansari, have been awarded the death penalty. Two namely Azharuddin Qureshi and one other have been given life imprisonment, while two others namely Ahmed Hussain and Mohammed Firoze Aslam have been given ten years in jail. One accused is sentenced to seven years imprisonment.

Earlier, on October 27, judge Gurwinder Singh Malhotra heading the NIA court had convicted Haider Ali alias Black Beauty, Noman Ansari, Mohammed Mujibullah Ansari, Mohammed Imtiaz Alam, Ahmed Hussain, Mohammed Firoze Aslam, Imtiaz Ansari, Mohammed Iftiqar Alam and Azharuddin Qureshi of the banned terrorist outfit Indian Mujahideen (IM). One Fakruddin was not convicted due to a lack of evidence.

The court had posted the case for hearing on November 1 to pronounce the quantum of punishment for the convicts.

During Narendra Modi’s Hunkar rally at Gandhi Maidan in October 2013, Indian Mujahideen terrorists had carried out a plan to assassinate Modi. Six massive blasts shook the jam-packed area ahead of Modi’s arrival. The incident resulted in the deaths of six individuals and the injuries of 83 more. Despite the terror incident, the BJP leaders had calmed the crowd and Modi had addressed a rally that drew a gathering of over three lakh people.

Another massive explosion occurred inside a bathroom on platform 10 of the Patna train station, killing a major suspect, 25-year-old Tariq Ansari alias Enul. The dead was one of numerous Indian Mujahideen trainees who had travelled from Ranchi to Patna with explosives in order to kill Modi.

On November 6, 2013, the Lucknow branch of the NIA took over the investigation. The probe revealed Indian Muhaideen had set up its modules in Ranchi.

Pepperfry asks people to forget crackers during Diwali, netizens say it is time to forget the furniture store

Online store brand for furniture and home decor, Pepperfry, has asked people to “forget crackers” during Diwali. Instead, their advise for people was to “Make your home sparkle this Diwali with amazing food, games and beautiful furniture!”

Source: Twitter

Hindus haven’t been taking such sermons kindly this festive season and consequently, Pepperfry too had to suffer the wrath of people online. They said that such constant messaging by brands has gotten irritating at this point.

People said that it was time to forget Pepperfry instead.

Others condemned the ‘woke’ ideology that appears to have pervaded the marketing industry.

Multiple brands have been forced to withdraw their ads this festive season for hurting the sentiments of Hindus. First it was Fabindia that had to withdraw its ‘Jashn-e-Riwaz’ collection, then there was Sabyasachi that had to withdraw its ad on Mangalsutra.

However, Pepperfry does not appear to be bothered by such incidents and has decided to ask people to forget crackers during Diwali.

Supreme Court reiterates there can’t be complete ban on firecrackers, sets aside Calcutta High Court’s total ban in West Bengal

The Supreme Court of India has set aside the order of the Calcutta High Court imposing a complete ban on firecrackers in the state of West Bengal. On October 29th, the Calcutta High Court had ordered a complete ban on all kinds of firecrackers throughout the state of West Bengal during the upcoming festivals including Diwali, Kali Puja, Guru Nanak Jayanti, Christmas and New Year’s celebrations. The court had said that only wax or oil-based diyas can be used, and banned all firecrackers including green firecrackers which are allowed by the SC and the NGT.

The High Court had ordered the complete ban saying that there is no mechanism to check whether firecrackers sold in shops are green firecrackers or not, and therefore went on to ban such green firecrackers as well.

Hearing a petition filed by the firecracker manufacturers, the Supreme Court found fault with this argument by the High Court. Moreover, the petitioners also stated that the matter of mechanism to verify green firecrackers was never raised during the hearing in the Calcutta High Court. The petitioners had also pointed out various orders by Supreme Court and the National Green Tribunal to argue that the complete ban is wrong.

The Supreme Court bench of Justices AM Khanwilkar and Ajay Rastogi agreed with the petitioners that while the High Court cites practical difficulties in allowing green firecrackers, no such difficulties are mentioned in the order. The court stated that the High Court should have given opportunities to the authorities to place on record if any mechanism was in place to ensure that only “green crackers” are being used. But the court issued the order without hearing about the mechanisms to identify green firecrackers, and the problems associated with them.

Calling the High Court order ‘extreme’, the apex court said, “we are convinced that Calcutta High Court should have called upon parties to give explanation before passing such an extreme order.”

West Bengal govt also contested the claim that there are difficulties in identifying allowed fireworks. Representing the state, senior advocate Anand Grover said that they are following the Supreme Court order allowing green firecrackers, and the cops do this using a mobile app. He informed the court that firecrackers are verified by scanning the QR cores printed on them, and several persons are arrested every year for selling fake green firecrackers which are identified using this method. He said that there is an unfounded apprehension by the Calcutta HC on this matter.

The apex court that there cannot be a complete ban on firecrackers, which it had already said on 29th October in a different case, and asked the authorities to strengthen mechanism to supervise and implement its orders. The apex court said that it is setting aside the high court order, and allowed anyone to approach the high court on the basis of any material or record.

The court added that the regime introduced by the NGT in respect of manufacture and sale of firecrackers will have to be followed by all, and to depart from it, some extreme position has to be pointed out, like inaction or collusion of the govt. The order said that at present Pollution Control Board have said that authorities are taking action, and in case of any inaction, appropriate action will be taken.

The court further ordered West Bengal govt to ensure that no banned crackers are imported into the state, and asked to strengthen the mechanism.

Yogi Adityanath slams Akhilesh Yadav for glorifying Jinnah, says it is ‘Talibani Mindset’

Uttar Pradesh CM Yogi Adityanath has slammed Akhilesh Yadav for glorifying Jinnah and said that the SP Chief’s comparison of Sardar Parel to Jinnah was shameful. While speaking at an event in Moradabad, CM Yogi Adityanath launched a scathing attack on Akhilesh Yadav and the Samajwadi Party for the glorification of the founder of Pakistan who had spearheaded India’s partition.

Yogi said, ‘Was listening to Samajwadi Party Chief’s statement yesterday, he was comparing Jinnah to the person who united this country, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel. Brothers and sisters, this is an absolute shameful statement, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel is the artist of India’s unity and integrity’ while Jinnah divided India into two.

CM Yogi further said that Akhilesh Yadav’s divisive mindset was revealed when he compared Jinnah to Sardar Patel. He said, “This kind of divisive mindset will not be accepted by the people of India”. He added, “This is Talibani mindset which always believes in dividing people, first he had tried to separate the social Talibans (radicals) on different grounds and when his every intention to create divide failed, he started insulting great men”.

CM Yogi also claimed that various opposition leaders in Uttar Pradesh were in home isolation during the Covid crisis in the state and said, ‘Far from helping the poor, those people did not even visit the families of their own party workers who died.

Earlier, Samajwadi Party Chief Akhilesh Yadav had glorified and praised Muhammad Ali Jinnah in a party rally during the Samajwadi Vijay Rath Yatra. At Hardoi district in UP, Akhilesh Yadav also compared the founder of Pakistan and the architect of the Indian partition, Muhammad Ali Jinnah to Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel.

Elle India deletes Hinduphobic cartoon from their social media pages after receiving backlash

Not even 24 hours since Elle India posted a Hinduphobic cartoon, the fashion magazine has now deleted it from their social media platforms after receiving a huge backlash.

Elle on Sunday had posted a cartoon by one Lord_VoldeMaut depicting ‘saffron-clad goons’ shutting shops of brands like Tanishq and Fabindia. The cartoon also depicted a man in an orange gamcha (stole) beating a meat seller sporting a skull cap (presumably for selling beef). 

Elle India’s Hinduphobic cartoon. Image Source: Instagram

The Hinduphobic cartoon was to support their article written by Ruman Baig in defence of brands like Fabindia and Tanishq. Interestingly, the magazine had picked up the cartoon off the internet without the artist’s consent. 

The 19-year-old artist who has been allegedly receiving threats for his artwork has deleted his social media accounts. The claim was shared by an anonymous social media user on Twitter who did not provide any proof of the so-called attacks. 

Update shared by an anonymous handle

Interestingly, this is not the first time that the artist had put up anti-Hindu content on Twitter and Instagram. 

Netizens had reacted sharply to Elle’s biased and communal portrayal of the issue. 

Elle comes out in support of Fabindia

In yet another attempt to demonize Hindu sentiments, Elle in its ‘sarcastic’ post had written, “It’s the recurring season where Indian fashion labels are schooled on how to creatively incorporate religion while designing their campaigns. Last year, @tanishqjewellery received a non-violent lesson on how to showcase jewellery without meddling with the ancient Hindu-Muslim narrative. Recently, @fabindiaofficial released and pulled down a Diwali campaign titled – Jashn-e-Riwaz.”

“Little did they know that the term means long-live Muslims in Urdu and is a secret ode to the Mughals. The fashion fraternity must learn how to not let their imaginations run free – a salwar for a Muslim woman is set in stone, and so is a bindi for a Hindu lady,” the post concluded. 

From Tanishq to Manyawar to Fabindia, the author left no stone unturned to prove how the “intolerant” Hindus have been attacking businesses resulting in ‘economic losses.’ 

While the magazine has taken down the cartoon, the ‘sarcastic’ writeup continues to feature on their website. 

Why Hindus should give widespread publicity to Audrey Truschke – she is now a headache for ‘liberals’

About a year ago, I remember liberals on Twitter widely sharing and praising a video of Audrey Truschke, where she apparently ‘destroys an entire bhakt rant with 4 simple words.’ She was speaking at some event, when a guy, evidently a Hindutva supporter from the audience, confronted her. With mike in hand and an opportunity to speak in public, he unloaded angrily on her. He gave her a piece of his mind, on everything from twisting Indian history to being a white person interfering with our affairs.

It didn’t work. Audrey was completely cool. She pointed out her credentials as a trained historian. She added smoothly that it must be that Hindutva supporters cannot bear to hear strong opinions from a woman. Leave aside for a moment what you think of the two people speaking in the video and the arguments from their respective ideological camps. There is no doubt that Audrey won the argument just by staying calm and choosing the right keywords. The guy who confronted her was angry, inexperienced in public speaking, and let his emotions get the better of him.

I had written a blog post about this at the time, noting that Hindutva supporters often fall short of choosing the right words (no pun intended) for the modern audience. This is deeply ironic since Hindutva is fundamentally a movement for the emancipation of a community that has been oppressed for one thousand years. In the modern world, victimhood is the most sought after commodity. And nobody has as much of it as Hindus do. We just lack the tools (i.e., right words) needed to exploit it. And yet, the modern world has labelled us as historical oppressors rather than victims. It’s like people having to line up for bread in Venezuela, the country with the world’s largest oil reserves.  I had added that the day Hindus learn to speak woke (i.e., pick up the right tools), we will become the highest moral authority on earth.

That day hasn’t quite arrived, though Hindus are getting better at using their tools. Why do you suppose liberals fight so hard to deny representation to Hindus on every forum? They know that with practice, Hindus will easily learn the tricks of the trade. Give that man from the audience five years of experience with public speaking and he will get the better of Truschke easily.

But this post is not about what Truschke said a year ago. Instead, it is about an amusing turn of events that I did not anticipate in the whole Audrey Truschke affair.  Get a load of this. (By the way, I’m stealing these screenshots from around the web. You see, Truschke blocks people a lot because she can’t handle criticism).

Image
Audrey Truschke tweet

And it gets ‘better.’

Image
Audrey Truschke tweet

Don’t get too provoked by these tweets. Because Audrey Truschke has cooked her own goose now. She did this to herself. She took a wrecking ball to her own intellect. This is what hatred does to people.

Why am I saying this? Because we already won the argument. Do you really need to persuade any Indian that these tweets are wrong and filled with hatred against Hindus? No, the swastika in India is an ancient Hindu symbol and everyone knows that. There is nothing ‘ambiguous’ about it. And Truschke here is trying to shift the Overton Window of international opinion on this. First, a generation of liberal historians slyly translated the German ‘Hakenkreuz into ‘swastika’ to open this window. Now, folks like Truschke are working on this opening, gradually making it bigger. Now she tries to alter the status of the Hindu swastika from an ancient religious symbol to an ‘ambiguous but mostly positive.’ What will they claim in ten years? Literally every Hindu who sees this tweet will figure it out easily.

And what happens when you show them the tweet that describes Indian revolutionaries as Hindu terrorists? You don’t have to argue with anyone over this. Every Indian will be furious if someone refers to people like Chandrasekhar Azad, Khudiram Bose or Ramprasad Bismil as terrorists. And that too Hindu terrorists! That’s when every Indian will agree with you that this person simply hates Hindus.

So, by all means, give widespread publicity to tweets like this from her. Show them to everyone you can. And when they are outraged, be sure to tell them that Audrey Truschke is a hero of Indian liberalism. Make sure you highlight this part as much as possible. Make sure you give people links to all the articles in mainstream liberal news portals praising Audrey Truschke.

You did it, Audrey. You made everyone hate you.

Did you notice that the big liberal portals, who generally follow closely behind her, wagging their tails and picking up her mess, have been silent on her latest outburst? They are silent because they are strategic. They know that her latest outburst is a public relations disaster. So what should the Hindutva supporters do now? Give as much publicity as possible to all the liberals who have aided and abetted Audrey Truschke. Make sure everyone knows that she is a start for the Indian liberal intelligentsia. Get them all to share in the blame.

Audrey Truschke is the new Arund***i Roy. That person has done more to make Indian liberalism an object of hatred and ridicule than any Hindutva supporter. At some point, the baton had to pass to someone new.

In retrospect, I should have seen this coming. Her mental degeneration was already evident when she tried to blame Hindutva for the riots at Capitol Hill. In fact, she was crazy enough to declare publicly that she was going to teach this in her course at Rutgers University. All this is based on a social media rumour that turned out to be totally false. What kind of person does something so radically foolish? Someone whose brain has turned to mush because of all the hatred that she has stockpiled against Hindus.

If I remember correctly, Audrey Truschke burst onto the Indian intellectual (political) scene around 2015 or 2016, with her book on Aurangzeb. The Communist historians had left Aurangzeb alone, believing he was far too despised.  But if every other Muslim emperor can be airbrushed, why not Aurangzeb as well? This was her big idea. She spent the next few years adroitly, fielding questions and deflecting criticism. Most professional historians already hate Hindus, so they were supportive anyway. In other words, her peers would never ask anything. And a common person trying to confront her would always be at a structural disadvantage in the argument. Because she is a professional historian. Imagine trying to win a legal argument with a trained lawyer, no matter how fair your case is.

What Audrey perhaps did not realize was that too much hatred was frying her brain. Each time her liberal friends applauded her propaganda, they egged her on to more and more ridiculous things. Now she has driven herself straight into a ditch. The job of the Hindutva supporters is to make sure every liberal follows her into that ditch. We must hold every liberal accountable for every word that Truschke says now. They loved her, they anointed her as an intellectual giant, and now they must own up to her words.

So what is Indian liberalism? Indian liberalism is now the ideology that calls Khudiram Bose a Hindu terrorist. Everyone who  identifies as an Indian liberal must now own up to this. We are quoting your favorite historian. Don’t blame us. Remember how Indian liberals held PM Modi personally accountable for some drunk guy throwing a stone at a church in Navi Mumbai? Well, let’s make sure that every Indian liberal is held accountable for the words of their favorite historian.

One final word. Given all sorts of twisted incentives there, perhaps Audrey Truschke will benefit from the attention, whether positive or negative. I have come across Hindutva supporters who act as if that’s a problem. But if you ask me, who cares? So what if Truschke makes a little bit on the side while becoming the number one tool to discredit Indian liberalism?