Home Blog Page 5187

New video suggests AajTak report on sexual exploitation in Chitrakoot was misleading, ‘victim’ says she didn’t understand the questions

On July 7, 2020, Hindi news channel AajTak ran a story on sexual exploitation of young girls by middlemen and contractors of the mining sector in Chitrakoot district in Uttar Pradesh. In its report, AajTak reporter Mausami Singh wrote that minor girls, aged 12-14 years, from poor tribal families in Chitrakoot, are forced to work in illegal mines for survival. It further said that the contractors and middlemen don’t pay them their wages easily. These girls have to trade off their bodies in exchange for their meagre wages, the report claimed.

The AajTak reporter had also taken to Twitter to share a video where she interviews one such girl who claims that contractors agree to employ them on the condition that they will also have to sell their bodies.

Congress senior minister Rahul Gandhi too used the AajTak report to further his propaganda. Tagging the media report Rahul Gandhi hit out at the Modi government by saying: “Starving family in an unplanned lockdown…These girls are having to pay a terrible price for a living. Is this the India of our dreams?”

AajTak’s report on sexual exploitation in Chitrakoot misleading

However, on Wednesday, the BJP leader, Amit Malviya, took to Twitter to share a new video, in which the ‘victims’ are heard rejecting the claims made by AajTak. On being asked by the correspondent, whether the contractors sexually exploit them in lieu of jobs or wages, the young girl categorically denied the claim. They are heard confirming that they have never been subjected to any sort of sexual exploitation. When the correspondent asks as to why earlier they agreed that they were sexually exploited by their contractors, the girl is heard saying that she didn’t understand what was being asked.

After this misleading report by AajTak started creating a furore on social media platforms, a Twitter user shared some screenshots to expose the AajTak reporter, Mausami Singh, who had cooked up this news. The Twitter user @ModiBharosa shared pictures where Mausami Singh is seen distributing ration to the poor and the needy. The Twitter user claimed that this is how she lures the poor into giving misleading interviews. The Twitter user also claims that the man accompanying India Today journalist Mausami Singh is a Congress worker.

Mausami Singh’s past shenanigans

This is, however, not the first time Mausami Singh has been called out for her shenanigans. Earlier too, we have reported how the journalist had made news for her antics. Last year, the journalist had created a massive drama at the Srinagar airport where she had apparently gone to cover the opposition politicians’ visit to Jammu and Kashmir following the abrogation of Article 370. She had accused the police personnel deployed at the Srinagar airport of manhandling her and trying to stop her from reporting. Her theatrics had then given enough meat to Pakistan to further their own narrative about Kashmir.

Prior to this, during the run-up to the 2019 general elections, Mausami was caught on camera ‘directing’ Congress workers to appear excited about Priyanka Gandhi Vadra. However, this is not where her theatrics and sycophancy is limited to. She has gone on to the extent of shielding Congress leader Mani Shankar Aiyar, irrespective of the fact that the Congress leader was openly abusing and misbehaving with another reporter.

Wasim Bari Murder: Kashmir IG confirms negligence by security detail, all 10 PSOs suspended

Vijay Kumar, IG of Jammu and Kashmir UT has stated that though Wasim Bari, former district president BJP had adequate security, there was definite negligence on the part of on-duty personnel. Bari was killed along with his two family members on 8th July by terrorists.

He said that the police had analyzed the CCTV footage, and it looks like the attack was planned. All ten personnel on duty have been suspended, and the investigators are looking into the matter.

According to the reports, Jammu and Kashmir police have found vital information indicating the involvement of LeT in the attack. The CCTV footage that police have retrieved showed terrorist moments before Bari and his family members, brother Umar Sultan and father Bashir Ahmad were killed. Police also found that at least one of the terrorists was local, and the other was from Pakistan. A manhunt has been initiated based on the information collected from the CCTV footage.

One local, one Pakistani terrorist

DGP Dilbagh Singh was quoted by Aaj Tak, saying, “this is the handiwork of a hybrid group. Two terrorists were involved, one local and one a Pakistani.” One of them has been identified as Abid. Singh said that it is possible that it was a planned attack and they kept in mind the proximity of the Bandipora police station that is only 50 feet away from the location of the incident.

Bari was returning after meeting another family member with his brother and father. The security officials were told to retire in their room that is located on the first floor. While Bari was attending a buyer who was there to purchase some items from his shop, the terrorists opened fire in which Bari and his family members died. The investigators believe that PSOs were present at the scene and the security camp was also nearby, but the attack was still carried out. It indicates that there might be some conspiracy behind it. The investigators have questioned PSOs and they have been suspended for the time being.

Suicide or Murder? As officials rule out any foul play, some questions are yet to be answered

The mysterious death of popular Bollywood actor Sushant Singh Rajput has opened a can of worms. There has been a vicious attack against superstars and leading production homes who have resorted to nepotism and bullying of actors who are ‘outsiders.’ But was the death a suicide?

One of the most talented Bollywood actors, Sushant Singh Rajput, died on the morning of June 14, 2020, at his residence in Bandra, Mumbai. The initial shock of his death hit his friends, relatives and fans very hard. A preliminary police investigation suggested it was a suicide by hanging, but several doubts about how he died, have since surfaced. Several details were being tweeted with images and videos. The case came under close public scrutiny.

The question that most people asked was how could an actor of his calibre quit life so easily. Initially, most news angles explored death due to depression theory. And social media was inundated with messages from politicians to media Moghuls expressing their sorrow at his sudden death. Very few questioned the circumstances that led to his death. But for the ones who really loved and missed him; his friends, relatives and fans, there were niggling doubts. His death was a jigsaw puzzle where the pieces just did not fit.

Following the sequence of events closely, what could be ascertained was that, the night before he died, he had returned with some friends at around 10.30 and had continued to celebrate, as the neighbours had heard hooting sounds coming from his apartment in Bandra. Two of his friends stayed the night over.

Next morning he goes for a walk, returns and plays games on his PlayStation and then takes a glass of pomegranate juice with him to his room. Later when the cook knocks on his door to ask him what he wanted for lunch, there was no answer. The friends, who stayed overnight, and the cook call a lock man to open his door and find him hanging. They then call Sushant’s sister and the police.

The police arrive and continue with their proceedings including taking his medical file with prescriptions, which was by his bedside table. And his body is taken by his friend, Sandeep Singh, to Cooper Hospital for post mortem. Hours after this, Sushant Singh Rajput’s family allege that he was murdered and demanded a police investigation in his untimely death, and a forensics team reach his residence to collect evidence the same afternoon.

The scene of crime, before his body was taken out, pointed out several discrepancies between what the police were divulging and what was actually seen in the room with the help of video and photographs:

  1. The police reported he had used the bed to hang himself, (there was no stool or chair). This seemed next to impossible, as the height between the bed which is around 1.5 to 2ft height and the fan seemed far too less for a man of 6 ft, weighing around 75 kilos, to hang to death from the video footage that has been seen. This is, of course, assuming that the height of the room is 9 feet. The green cloth, which lay on the bed, was torn and a part of it still hung from the fan, it appeared too flimsy to hold his height and weight.
  2. Some have alleged that the duplicate keys to his bedroom were missing, (normally a person would entrust duplicate keys, in this case computerized keys, to someone he trusted greatly). If this is true, who had the keys and why were they missing?  The cook and two of his friends who had stayed overnight, did not break open the door instead they called a locksmith who makes the key and opens the door. When the key was a computerized one, how did they get a locksmith to make one so easily and so fast?
  3. Police found his medical documents and prescriptions by his bedside. Why would one normally leave their medical documents  there, was it an attempt by someone to show he was depressed and was taking medicines?
  4. The body itself had strangulation marks that were round in shape and not V-shaped which is how it would look when one commits suicide. Several images showed the dark indent, which could not have been caused by a flimsy dupatta, but something far stronger, like a rope.
  5. The normal signs of struggle, when a man commits suicide too were missing, his face was neither blue, nor were his eyes or tongue protruding. Instead looking at his images, you notice that there were bruises near his forehead, one eye and arms. One eye was partially open and the skin around it looked dark. How did these bruises appear if it was just a normal case of suicide?
  6. Fudge, his dog reportedly did not bark or create an alert when all this transpired. So where was the dog when this happened? The videos show him confused, sad and looking for his owner, so was the dog drugged?  
  7. His autopsy report showed asphyxia due to hanging, which itself does not mean suicide, it could mean he was strangled by someone, and then the whole thing could have been staged as a suicide.  
  8. While the viscera report showed there were no chemicals found in his body. The glass from which he had drunk pomegranate juice after going to his bedroom was missing in his room.
  9. The last calls he made were to Rhea Chakraborthy, his girlfriend, at 1.47am and Mahesh Shetty at 1.51am. Neither calls were returned.
  10. His body was reportedly taken by his friend, Sandip to Cooper Hospital, which is run by BMC (Brihanmumbai Muncipal Corporation), which incidentally had come under fire recently after an audio recording of the doctors demanding bribe surfaced. Cooper Hospital, was the same hospital where actresses Jiah Khan (who was involved with Sooraj Pancholi), Divya Bharati (wife of Producer Sajjid Nadiawalla) and Parveen Babi (who had a relationship with director Mahesh Bhatt) were taken to after their death. It was later reported that Mahesh Bhatt knew a doctor in Cooper Hospital.  
  11. The final postmortem report by five doctors said it was clear case of suicide, and that there was no struggle or injury marks on his body. Which, however is being proved otherwise by photographic and video images of his body.
  12. Before his body was taken, a video reveals that his finger was moving, showing a cadaveric spasm (stiffness of the muscles in extreme cases) which was then covered with a cloth by someone.

Subsequently a complaint was filed before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mukesh Kumar, in Bihar by Kundan Kumar, a resident of Muzaffarpur against Rhea Chakraborthy of abetment in the death of Sushant Singh Rajput. Rhea Chakraborthy, who had starred in Mahesh Bhatt’s ‘Jalebi,’ was in a relationship with Sushant, which had  soured a few months back. Rhea was the one Sushant called the night before he died, but there was no response from her.  

It was reported that Rhea deleted all the photographs of both of them from Instagram, three days before his death. Her mother said that she had complained to her director and mentor, Mahesh Bhatt that Sushant had stopped taking medicines for depression and was acting weird, that he was hearing voices that were threatening him.

Another fact that came to the fore was that Sushant had started a company with Rhea and her brother Showik called ‘Vividrage Rhealityx Private Limited’ and he was the only one who put money into it. And that this fact was not divulged to the police during Rhea’s nine-hour interrogation. Sushant’s father said that he had stopped taking medicines for depression some months back. Sushant was consulting Psychiatrist Kersi Chavda for depression. Kersi, it is reported, is a good friend of Mahesh Bhatt.

This was followed by both Mahesh and Mukesh Bhatt making statements that Sushant was depressed. In fact, Mahesh Bhatt, went further to say that his case reminded him of actress Parveen Babi, who was suicidal and had died due to depression. Director Shekhar Kapur, who was planning to feature him in ‘Paani’ in partnership with Yash Chopra Films (which never happened), too confessed on twitter that Sushant was undergoing a bad period and he wished he was around to help him.

Subsequently, a case was filed by Sudhir Kumar Ojha in the Chief Judicial Magistrate’s court against six prominent Bollywood makers for abetment to Sushant’s death. Soon, reports came out that his depression could have stemmed from the fact that seven big production houses had banned Sushant from films; Dharma Productions (KaranJohar), YRF Films (Aditya Chopra), Balaji (Ekta Kapoor), Sajid Nadiadwala, SKF Films (SalmanKhanFilms), T Series, and DineshVijan.

Clearly pointing to the fact that these production houses were creating camps or cartels that do not allow enough fair opportunities for the meritorious. In fact, nepotism, where the film industry establishment preferred to promote its own progeny, and their friends and family became the target of attack by people on social media in the coming weeks.

Karan Johar’s casting choices have created the impression that he certainly is the most prominent of the guardians of nepotism. But there are many others like

Ekta Kapoor, Mahesh Bhatt, Aditya Chopra, who formed a part of it. Hence the same actors, children of stars/directors like  Alia Bhatt, Arjun Kapoor, Varun Dhawan, Ranbir Kapoor, were given most of the roles. Roles promised to Sushant were taken away and given to these actors. And the same coterie constantly belittled Sushant on stage shows and TV chat shows like “Koffee with Karan” to make him feel insignificant.

A few actors like Nana Patekar, Shekhar Suman paid visits to Sushant’s family in Bihar to give their condolences. Shekhar Suman was vocal about the underworld’s role in Bollywood crimes. It was reported that Sushant had changed his SIM cards 50 times because he was receiving death threats. So who was threatening him and why?

What seems even stranger is that after his death, when his phone was in the custody of the police, his Twitter and Instagram accounts were being tampered by someone, his number of followers were being reduced, he was suddenly following director Mahesh Bhatt. His popular TV serial ‘PavithraRishta’ was removed from YouTube.

One also wonders whether his death was linked with the death of his manager, 28-year-old Disha Salian, just eight days before. Disha was reported to have committed suicide by jumping off a high rise building in Malad, Mumbai. The police registered the case as an accidental death. Nothing more was known regarding this. Sushant’s response was to write to her family to show how upset he was.

The fact remains that Bollywood is seeped in a quagmire of underworld dons and politicians, who control the fate of actors and movie makers. Big, blockbuster movies are made with their help, they even decided who would star in them.

While Demonetization, affected their business to a large extent, and big banner films stopped being produced, crime in this area continued unabated and criminals were given a free chit, as the connections with politicians, corporates, film-makers run rather deep. The deaths of Jia Khan, Divya Bharati, Parveen Babi were examples of this link.

But then the public was aware that Sushant was different through his interviews and public talks. He had aspired to be a pilot, but on his father’s insistence joined engineering. Which he then quit a few months before graduation to enter TV, drama and then films. He excelled in all these areas with his quality of seeping into the characters he played.

His love for quantum physics, astronomy and space technology was often shared with the public. He bought an expensive Meade telescope 14” LX600 to look at the stars from his apartment. He had undergone a month-long training at NASA for a role he was doing as an astronaut in ‘Chanda Mama Door ke’ which never took off. He also bought a piece of land in the region of Mare Moscoviense on the moon. His dream was to travel to the Moon, as an astronaut, in 2024.

He also had a bucket list of 50 things he dreamed of doing and shared with the public, out of which he had ticked 12 of them. A motorcycle aficionado, he bought a BMW motorbike and a Maserati in the same shade of a dinky car that he had as a child. He contributed Rs 1 Crore each towards Kerala and Nagaland flood relief. He never showed the kind of attitude stars usually show, he always obliged ordinary people with selfies, right from balloon sellers to beggars.

Hence the mystery of his death remains more prevalent, as an intelligent, ambitious and humane person does not leave the world without saying a word, or leaving a suicide note. How could a man with vast knowledge in quantum physics and space science, an actor, a seeker and a good human being disappear in this silent manner? Fans and well-wishers are clamouring for a proper CBI investigation, to ensure justice is given to his family and fans as they are losing their faith in the local police. They believe that once the mystery is solved they can give a dignified, final goodbye to the star they loved.            

Meena Das Narayan is the Editor-in-Chief of Gulf Connoisseur and has three decades of writing on lifestyle, art and cultural stories. She is also a movie-maker, artist, poet, cartoonist and director of dance operas. This article has been put together with the help of inputs from press and police reports, and various people, who have been following the case closely. I would like to especially thank Nagaraj Pandith who is in 12th standard and Soha Patel, a social worker.

Used cartridges from the rooftop: What was collected from the scene where Ratan Lal was murdered and what it all means

From the 24th of February to the 26th of February, Delhi burnt with massive communal riots that were a direct consequence of the sabre-rattling by Islamist mobs. As in every communal riot, both Hindus and Muslims lost their lives in the riots, however, the chargesheets filed in the riots prove that the Islamist mobs had pre-planned the riots to specifically target Hindus of Delhi. During the anti-Hindu Delhi riots, the brutal murder of Ratan Lal was one of the first acts of violence that shook the nation.

The chargesheet filed in the murder of Ratan Lal points towards a sinister plan. Recently, we reported how the Ratan Lal chargesheet mentions DS Bindra, that Sikh man who was hailed for his humanity. The media had painted Bindra as a hero who had organised langars for the anti-CAA protestors, however, the chargesheet confirms that Bindra was an instigator of the riots that led to the brutal murder of Ratan Lal.

The chargesheet filed by Special Investigation Team of Delhi Police in the murder of Ratan Lal and deadly attacks by rioters on IPS Amit Sharma and IPS Anuj Kumar mentions at least 17 accused. There are about 4 to 5 key conspirators in the entire case, which includes Salim Khan, Salim Munna and Shadab. The police stated that the riots were engineered in Delhi through a conspiracy to malign the image of the country. 

There were several other extremely disturbing details that emerged from the chargesheet, a part of which has been accessed by OpIndia.

The chargesheet mentions the samples and evidence that was collected by the investigating team from the scene where Ratan Lal was murdered.

Following is the list of exhibits collected from the scene and its vicinity:

  • 40 bricks and stones
  • 3 bottles partially filled with petrol and chemicals
  • One live cartridge
  • 5 improvised petrol bombs
  • Two used cartridges
  • Pellet of cartridge
  • 2 pieces of lead particle
  • Blood sample and swabs collected by the forensic team

What is pertinent to note about these exhibits collected by the crime scene where Ratan Lal was murdered during the Delhi riots, is that some of them were collected from the roof of an auto-rickshaw shop in the area.

According to the chargesheet, bottles filled with chemicals, a live cartridge and improvised petrol bombs were found from the roof of Skyride e-rickshaw shop. Interestingly, two used cartridges were also found on the roof of this shop. Since the team found two used cartridges from the roof of a rickshaw shop, it also becomes evident that the mob that murdered Ratan Lal had come fully prepared for violence and the firing even happened from rooftops.

There have been several such cases where the roofs of buildings were used as launchpads to attack Hindus. In Shiv Vihar, Rajdhani School, owned by a Muslim, was also turned into a launchpad to hunt Hindus down. From the rooftop of Tahir Hussain’s building too several such weapons were recovered. This is the building from where the Chand Bagh riots were launched and eventually, the mob led by Tahir Hussain had mercilessly and brutally murdered IB staffer Ankit Sharma.

It is pertinent to note that in the chargesheet filed in the case of Ratan Lal as well, the police has in no uncertain terms mentioned that the entire riot was pre-planned. It says, “The accused persons further combinedly disclosed that along with them D.S Bindra, Dr Rizwan, Athar, Shahdab, Upasna, Tabbsum, Ravish and others were involved in the conspiracy behind the ChandBagh riots”. Further, arrested accused Shahanawaz and Ibrahim “disclosed that the riots were a part of a conspiracy hatched by the organiser namely DSBindra, Dr Rizwan, Suleman (Salman), Saleem Khan, Saleem Munna and others with the help of others”.

Most importantly, the chargesheet also categorically states that the conspirators “were fully aware that violence may ensue and had accordingly directed the protestors to arm themselves”. 

It is thus clear that a conspiracy was hatched to indulge in widespread violence and it is this conspiracy that led to the Islamist mob murdering Ratan Lal. The narrative by the Leftists that aims to convince the nation that the riots were spontaneous and a result of some disgruntlement in the Muslim community certainly does not hold water.

Congress doubles down on its ‘Brahmin card’ with the arrest of Vikas Dubey and encounter of his aides

Ever since the Uttar Pradesh police arrested the notorious gangster Vikas Dubey and encountered his aides, the Congress party has stepped-up its caste politics in the state in a hope that it could revive its fallen political fortunes and has now resorted to playing ‘Brahmin card’ to sympathise with the arrest of a notorious gangster and the death of his aides.

Senior Congress leader Jitin Prasada on Thursday took to Twitter to question the role of the Uttar Pradesh Police in the Vikas Dubey case and the encounters of his aides, who were responsible for the killing of eight policemen and injuring several others.

Raising suspicion over the death of the aides of Vikas Dubey, Congress leader Jitin Prasada claimed that the Uttar Pradesh government was trying to ‘cover-up’ the Vikas Dubey case. He also alleged that the UP police had arrested the family members of Dubey’s henchmen, including Khushi Dubey, who was allegedly married just nine days earlier to Amar Dubey.

Image Source: Jitin Prasada

Trying to play Brahmin-card for political gains?

Questioning the role of UP Police, the Congress leader also alleged that the action of Uttar Pradesh police had resulted in Khushi Dubey becoming a widow. Further, he also stated that the encounter of Prabhat Mishra under arrest further proved that the government “did not want anyone left alive” to tell the real story.

“Khushi probably had no choice being married off to Amar and continues to suffer as a widow and facing police harassment. Get Vikas Dubey alive and expose the links and the rot in the system from top to bottom and justice prevails,” Jitin Prasada tweeted.

In fact, Prasada’s tweets are in line with earlier claims that leaders will stop short of painting the criminals as Brahmin heroes officially, but leave enough hints for workers and non-state actors to carry forward that propaganda.

Congress leaders attempting to woo Brahmins by highlight Vikas Dubey case

As soon as the manhunt to nab the notorious gangster Vikas Dubey began in Uttar Pradesh, there were reports that Congress party was attempting to use WhatsApp groups to paint the Yogi Government as ‘anti-brahmin’.

Linking the Vikas Dubey case to caste politics, former Union Minister and senior Congress leader in the state Jitin Prasada had claimed that atrocities on the Brahmin community had increased under the Yogi Adityanath government.

“There has been an attempt to sideline the community, and make it feel humiliated and insecure. The community is being made to struggle for justice and is facing step-motherly treatment. It”s being deprived of its rights and the need of the hour is to unite and fight for its identity,” Jitin Prasada had claimed.

He had also stated that he will use the ‘Brahmin Chetna Samvad’ to connect with the Brahmin community to discuss various issues pertaining to the community and find acceptable solutions to their problems.

It was reported that the Congress party is planning to use such platforms to highlight any punishment meted out to Vikas Dubey for his crimes and portray it as punishment handed out to ‘Brahmin Vikas Dubey’. Looking at Congress’ history with caste politics, it is only expected that the will try to exploit the prosecution of a wanted criminal in a last-ditch effort to revive their party in the state.

HRD Minister clears the air about the exclusion of some chapters from CBSE syllabus for current year, calls MSM’s reporting sensationalism

Dr. Ramesh Pokhriyal Nishank, Union Cabinet Minister for Human Resource Development, has posted a series of tweets in which he clarified the controversy around exclusion of certain topics from the CBSE Syllabus. In the thread, he said that the news agencies and reporters have restored to sensationalism by connecting topics selectively and portrayed a false narrative.

Course-wide reduction of topics amid Covid-19

Nishank said that CBSE has already clarified that they asked the schools to follow NCERT Alternative Academic Calendar amid coronavirus pandemic. He said that all the topics mentioned had been covered under the Academic Calendar. The main aim of an alternate calendar is to reduce the stress on students by cutting down the syllabus by 30 percent that has been advised by various experts and educationists.

He said, “The exclusions are merely a 1-time measure for exams,” and added that it was easy to selectively pick exclusion of 3-4 topics like nationalism, local government, federalism, etc. and build a false narrative around it. However, no one cared to mention that the exclusion is happening across subjects. He added that Measures of Dispersion, Balance of Payments Deficit, etc., in Economics and Heat Engine & Refrigerator, Heat Transfer, Convection & Radiation in Physics are few examples of excluded topics.

What is the controversy?

On 7th July 2020, CBSE announced the revised Academic Curriculum for the session 2020-21 for the classes XI and XII. CBSE urged schools to reduce the burden on other classes as well. In the letter, CBSE mentioned that they are taking the said step to reduce the burden on students during a pandemic. They also noted that the schools might ensure that the students learn these topics, but they will not be part of the internal assessment and year-end board exam.

Many reports and MSM news agencies picked up the news and tried to twist some facts to launch a false narrative. They tried to imply that the HRD Ministry is using Covid-19 to remove crucial topics like nationalism, federalism, local government, and more from the curriculum. Papers, like Telegraph, mentioned in their article, “The government’s critics have underlined that many of the axed topics tend to promote knowledge and ideas that are unfriendly to the RSS-BJP ideology,” which is too far-fetched.

Excerpt from Telegraph’s article

Nidhi Razdan, who recently announced her departure from NDTV and said she would teach journalism at Harvard University, seems to be ignorant about the topic in her tweet.

While Indian Express did mention that the reduction is only for the year 2020-21 and posted a complete list of topics in the article, they too did not shy away from using a sensationalized social media post to catch the eye of the readers.

Youth Congress used an article published by NDTV and called it cheap government tactics to keep the young generation unaware and silenced.

Misinterpretation of press releases and statements from the government is not new. Recently, after the Galwan Valley stand-off, the statement of PM Narendra Modi was misinterpreted by the mainstream media and PMO had to release a clarification in the matter.

Unconfirmed reports of Newslaundry columnist Sharjeel Usmani being ‘picked up’ by UP Police emerge on social media

Islamists and ‘liberals’ claimed on social media that Newslaundry columnist Sharjeel Usmani, who had hailed Delhi riots shooter Shahrukh as ‘Mujahid’, has been ‘picked up’ by UP Police. They claimed that the cops came in plain clothes and took him away, thereby insinuating that the police have ‘abducted’ him.

Abul Aala Subhani claimed that five unknown persons who identified themselves as Azamgarh unit of UP Crime Branch ‘detained’ Usmani. The usual suspects came together to spread this without actually verification of the information that Usmani was detained arbitrarily.

Here again it is important to note that there is no confirmation whether it was indeed ‘police’ that had ‘picked him up’.

Barkha Dutt’s ‘shero’ Aysha Renna too used to woke ‘pass it on’ format for claiming that the state is hounding young Muslim leaders.

Her buddy even went a step further and claimed that Usmani was arrested.

“Abduction” someone cried.

Do note that there is no confirmation on this yet. When OpIndia contacted Azamgarh Police station, the cops maintained that do not know about any such ‘detainment’. Interestingly, Amar Ujala claims that they got in touch with Aligarh SP Crime Branch Arvind Kumar who confirmed the ‘arrest’. All the social media reports claimed it was Azamgarh unit of Crime Branch which ‘detained’ Usmani. Azamgarh and Aligarh are situated over 700 kms apart. Further, the featured image of Amar Ujala report has Sharjeel Imam, The Wire columnist who was arrested over his seditious speech.

Amar Ujala report on Sharjeel Usmani with Sharjeel Imam’s image

Two different Sharjeels. This casts a shadow of doubt over the accuracy of the report.

However, to suit the agenda, The Wire too published a report claiming Sharjeel Usmani was arrested over December 2019 anti-CAA protests. The Wire also cites Amar Ujala report. Hence, either The Wire did not get in touch with the police itself or The Wire chose not to mention that police was unable to give details because Amar Ujala report fit their agenda.

Rumours have also emerged that fearing crackdown over his involvement in the 2019 violent anti-CAA protests, he may have gone ‘underground’ to a ‘safe place’. While the truth will come out eventually, the rumour mills have already overworked themselves to show that the state is cracking down on ‘Muslims’.

Who is Sharjeel Usmani

In June this year, this columnist with Newslaundry glorified Islamist Shahrukh Pathan, accused of opening fire on Delhi police during the February 2020 anti-Hindu riots. Usmani lavished praises on the accused rioters, saying that he is proud of Shahrukh, who ‘fought for his community’ (Muslims) when the entire state machinery and ‘Hindutva army’ was apparently ‘killing and looting’ them. Prior to that, he had announced his intentions of using Muslims as the fifth columns in the country to undermine Indian interests.

After the incendiary speeches of Sharjeel Imam had gone viral on social media, Sharjeel Usmani had rushed in to defend him. He had urged Muslims to not disassociate themselves from the JNU scholar and declared that he was ‘in this together’ with the radical Ismamist. 

Sharjeel Usmani had been booked earlier by the Police earlier for an objectionable post on Lal Krishna Advani. The post allegedly had a photograph of the veteran BJP leader with the caption “Punish those guilty of Babri Demolition”.

“Opening doors and windows help virus escape”: West Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee shares her wisdom on fighting Coronavirus

During a meeting on Sunday, West Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee had reportedly shared her wisdom on fighting Coronavirus, after doctors had demanded portable air-conditioners to help them work while wearing PPE (Personal Protective equipment) bodysuits. Suggesting a lack of funds for procuring ACs extensively, she suggested an economical way to deal with the pandemic.

Ekta jinis mone rakhben, dorja janla khule dila virus ta kintu taratari chole jai (Remember this thing: Opening doors and windows help Coronavirus escape)”, Mamata Banerjee made a bizarre claim at 1:47 minute into the video. She further informed, “Whenever I travel by car, I keep the windows open. I do not have many windows or doors at my home. But, I keep them open as and when possible. The entry of sunlight or outside air into the room helps the virus escape.”

Mamata Banerjee also urged doctors to follow suit and keep doors and windows open. “Assuming that doctors work for 8 hours, the portable air-conditioners will work for 4-5 hours. If possible, open the doors and windows for 1 to 1.5 hours. Do you know why? The virus will go out (of the room). This will be good for them,” she emphasised.

Coronavirus in West Bengal

According to data shared by the Union Health Ministry, the State of West Bengal has reported 7,705 active cases of Coronavirus and 827 deaths till July 9. The outbreak of the pandemic in the State and the subsequent mishandling by the administration has compelled patients and families to do the unthinkable. Earlier, in a shocking incident, a family-based in North Kolkata in West Bengal was compelled to store the dead body of their elderly family member, who later turned out to be Coronavirus positive, in an ice-cream freezer for two days after the doctor refused to issue a death certificate without the COVID-19 test results, urging the family to contact the health department or the police.

Bangladesh: Video of Muslims destroying fence of 200-year-old Hindu temple goes viral on social media

On Monday, the bamboo fence bordering a 200-year-old Shiva temple and a privately owned land was destroyed by miscreants in the Dighirjan village of Pirojpur district in the Barisal Division of Bangladesh, reported Bangladesh Darpan.

The video of the incident has since gone viral on social media. In the video, a man dressed in blue can be seen breaking the fence with a stick. “Viewers, see how Hindus are being persecuted here. We are staying here for ages but they are now destroying our fence. Look at the law and order situation in the country under the Awami League government,” a Hindu person was heard as saying. Another person, in the background, said that the vandalism was an ‘act of loot’ and a malicious attempt to hurt their sentiments. Inspired by the actions of the miscreant, another man, dressed in red, began to vandalise the property.

Attempt to grab land

As per the report, influential land grabbers in the area had been eyeing the land of the Hindu property. As such, Tehsildar Mohammed Shahjahan Sheikh, Mohammed Hedayet Sheikh, and Mohammed Kamrul Sheikh came and destroyed the bamboo fence to illegally occupy the land. The property belongs to one Dripen Mazumdar who works as the principal of Shaheed Janani College. He is also the Vice-President of Hindu-Buddhist-Christian Unity Council.

As per the report, about 10% of the Shiva temple and 11% of the family land of Mazumdar was fenced with bamboo and barbed wire. The official records identify his family as the owner of the land and the temple. Reportedly, the area falls under the jurisdiction of Nazirpur police station. Even after Mazumdar intervened, the miscreants were unabated in their effort of destroying the bamboo fence. He further added that they abused him and the female members of the family.

As per locals, minorities in Bangladesh have been subjected to persecution irrespective of money and power. “Abhava aar kotodin cholbe. Onnaiyar virodha sobai oikobodho hoya pratibad gore tulun. Akhono somoi aacha (How long will this (persecution) continue? Stand united against injustice. There is still time to fix this)”, the report noted.

From Vikas Dubey has reached Nepal to he may be encountered ‘because he knows dirty secrets’: Read how conspiracy theorists spun yarns

Notorious gangster Vikas Dubey has been arrested on July 9, 2020, after almost a week-long chase by the Police. He is main accused in the attack on police party which had gone to raid his place and arrest him last week. 8 policemen, including a DSP, were killed by the gangster and his aides. However, as Dubey was on the run, the journalists kept themselves busy conjuring up various conspiracy theories.

‘Journalist’ Swati Chaturvedi late on Wednesday announced that Dubey has gone away to Nepal.

To make things clearer, Nepal, where Swati had claimed Dubey has managed to reach and Ujjain, where he surrendered, are in opposite directions.

Map to explain Swati Chaturvedi that Ujjain and Nepal are in opposite directions.

As one can see in the map above, two opposite directions.

Vikas Dubey reacting to Swati’s prediction <joke>

You can read more of her predictions which she makes after interacting with her imaginary friends here.

Swati also had quite an insightful conversation with her colleague Rohini Singh from The Wire.

As someone who has a complicated relationship with facts, it is amusing how highly the women think of themselves. The only thing they expose is how they write fantasies and pass them off as ‘exposes’.

Here they are discussing how Dubey may be encountered because he knows the dirty secrets of politicians. She had also painted him larger than life that he will now run his underworld mafia business from the jail if he is arrested. Covering both the sides in case he is killed when police goes to arrest him or in case he is actually arrested.

But our desi Rita Skeeters aren’t the only ones who were busy spinning yarns.

Rajdeep Sardesai wrote of one ‘retired IPS officer’ who told him that Dubey is unlikely to be caught alive and that he and his aides will be killed in an encounter.

He also claimed that Dubey’d be killed because he knows too many secrets about too many ‘big people’. Except, just 30 minutes after this tweet of his, Dubey was caught in Ujjain. Click here to see how MP Police slapped him when he announced he is ‘Kanpur wala Vikas Dubey’.

There are other minions, too, who had been predicting that Dubey will be ‘killed in an encounter.

Asim Ali is a columnist with ThePrint, The Wire and Newslaundry. Another theory floated by Supreme Court advocate Prashant Bhushan.

Bhushan claimed that Dubey surrendered to Madhya Pradesh Police as he would be killed by the Uttar Pradesh Police in a ‘staged encounter’. He added that Dubey may still be killed in an encounter ‘after he is handed over’ to UP Police, thereby casting aspersions on the cops.

Here it is imperative to point out that UP as well as MP are both BJP-ruled states. Had there been a conspiracy as Bhushan implies, either of the state police could have ‘staged’ an encounter as he suggests.

Vikas Dubey, the dreaded gangster

Vikas Dubey is a notorious criminal, who carries a reward of Rs 25,000 on his head. He is also a former member of the district panchayat and has at least 60 cases of murder, robbery against him. Vikas Dubey, a former Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) leader, was also elected as a member of the Nagar Panchayat. The former BSP leader was also named in the murder of Siddheshwar Pandey, the principal and assistant manager of Tarachand Inter College, in 2000.

Vikas Dubey was also accused in the murder of Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader Santosh Shukla inside the Shivli police station in 2001. During the attack, two policemen were also killed by Vikas Dubey. However, he was later aquitted by a local court for lack of evidence.

On the intervening night of July 2 and 3, a team of Uttar Pradesh Police had gone to raid an area in search of criminal Vikas Dubey in Chaubepur in Kanpur. The police team comprising of 15-16 personnel had carried out the raid based on a complaint from Rahul Tiwari, who had lodged a case against Vikas Dubey recently on charges of attempt to murder.

As the police team reached the spot, they were ambushed by Dubey’s men who were prepared with arms on the roof of a building and continuously shot at them. Shockingly, the criminals had already stationed a JCB machine on the road to block the police team. 8 police personnel were killed in the attack. As per police, Dubey’s men were tipped off and were already aware of the raid.