Home Blog Page 6349

Your chowkidar is not going to budge because of abuses by those who are out on bail: PM Modi in Solan

While addressing a public rally in Salon, Himachal Pradesh, Prime Minister Narendra Modi launched a veiled attack at the remarks made Indian Overseas Congress Chairman SamPitroda’s insensitive remarks about the 1984 anti-Sikh riots.


Attacking the Congress Party, Modi said that they ask for votes in the name of their ancestors but fail to answer when questioned about the misdeeds of their ancestors. Making a reference to Congress Presiden Rahul Gandhi and his mother Sonia Gandhi who are out on bail in National Herald case, Modi said that those who themselves are out on bail abuse him.


He said that such people are picking new words from their dictionary to abuse him but he would not budge due to their abuses because he had eaten the mushroom of Solan.

Solan is called the ‘Mushroom City of India’ and it also has the Directorate of Mushroom Research (DMR) located in it. The DMR was set up as the National Centre for Mushroom Research and Training (NCMRT) in 1983 during the 6th Five Year Plan under the aegis of Indian Council of Agricultural Research. It was upgraded to the DMR in 2008.

BJP approaches EC, files complaint against Kamal Haasan for terming Godse as ‘independent India’s first terrorist who was a Hindu’

The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has filed a complaint with the Election Commission of India (EC) against Kamal Haasan for his ‘Hindu terrorist’ remark on Nathuram Godse. Haasan while addressing an election rally on Sunday had said the assassin of Mahatma Gandhi “was independent India’s first terrorist and a Hindu.”


The complaint has been filed by BJP leader Ashwini Upadhyay, saying the statement was intended to outrage religious feelings of millions of Hindus. Upadhyay said the speech has also breached the Model Code of Conduct as no one can appeal to caste or communal feelings to secure votes.

Haasan is the President of the Makkal Needhi Maiam (MNM) party and a new entrant to the political fray in India. Speaking at an election rally for his party candidate in Aravakurichi assembly constituency, he had termed Godse as independent India’s first terrorist, stirring a fresh controversy. “Independent India’s first terrorist was a Hindu. His name was Nathuram Godse. I’m not saying this because this is a locality with a sizeable Muslim population. I’m saying this in front of a Gandhi statue,” he had said.

According to reports, BJP has accused Haasan of misusing religion for electoral gains. “It is necessary to state that the statement was made deliberately in the presence of a Muslim majority crowd for electoral gain, which is clearly a corrupt practice under Section 123(3) the Representation of the People Act 1951,” the BJP said in its complaint letter to EC.
“Mr. Kamal Hasaan is deliberately promoting enmity between different groups on the grounds of religion and doing acts prejudicial to maintenance of Harmony and brotherhood, which is an offence under Section 153A of the IPC”, the complaint alleged.

BJP in its complaint to the EC has pointed out that any attempt to seek votes by invoking caste or communal feelings should be dealt with strongly.

Haasan has been receiving criticism for his remarks.

On the other hand, KS Alagiri of Congress has endorsed Haasan’s comment. “I support and agree with Kamal Haasan’s statement not only 100%, but 1000%,” Alagiri said while equating RSS with Islamic State.

However, this is not the first time that Haasan has landed himself in a controversy. Earlier, we had reported how the actor-turned-politician had been called out on social media for his controversial comment demanding a plebiscite in Kashmir. He had referred to Pakistan Occupied Kashmir as ‘Azad Kashmir’ but was forced to make a U-turn after an outrage.

Congress party compares RSS with the Islamic State, supports Kamal Haasan’s comments on Godse

Tamil Nadu Congress chief KS Alagiri on Monday compared the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) with the Islamic State (IS) when he was asked to comment upon Kamal Haasan’s comment on Nathuram Godse.


KS Alagiri while talking to the media said “It is the same as how the IS is in the Arab countries. Even the IS in those countries says that they need to eliminate even the Muslims if they don’t believe in their ideas. It’s not just elimination; it’s elimination from the world itself.”

“Extreme leftists and rightists will follow the same policy. Even religion fundamentalists are same. RSS in Hinduism is just like ISIS in Islam, both are similar. I support and agree Kamal Haasan’s statement not only 100% but 1000%,” he added.

While Alagiri maintains that terrorism has no religion, he continues to support Kamal Haasan’s statement about Godse being India’s first ‘Hindu terrorist’. The founder of Makkal Needhi Maiyam (MNM) made the comment on Godse while speaking at an election rally for his party candidate in Aravakurichi assembly constituency.


Meanwhile, in an interview with Times Now, a member of the Makkal Needhi Maiyam (MNM) tried to explain the context of Kamal Haasan’s comments on Godse. He said that Kamal Haasan intended to explain how terrorism has no religion by using Godse as an example of ‘Hindu terrorism’.

India, Tibet and China: The Eternal Triangle

On 12th April this year, a frail 83-year-old Lhamo Thondup was discharged from a hospital in New Delhi where he had spent 3 days due to ill health. This would seem to be inconsequential; an extremely old man admitted to a hospital for treatment. Except for the fact that Lhamo Thondup or Dalai Lama as he is better known across the world as is the spiritual head of over 6 million Tibetans across the world and the last weakening symbol of Tibetan resistance against communist China.

Tibet in history

Tibet lies between the ancient civilizations of India and China. Sandwiched between towering Himalayan Mountains, it is nicknamed “the roof of the world” or “the land of snows”.

The earliest known account of Tibet is of Nyatri Tsenpo establishing his rule in 127 B.C with the establishment of the Yarlung Dynasty. Around 7th Century the country was unified under King Songtsen Gampo and his successors who founded the Tibetan Empire. It was at its greatest extent between the 780s and the 790s. During this time the Tibetan Empire ruled and controlled a territory stretching from modern-day parts of Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Burma, China, India, Nepal, Pakistan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan.

Tibet 7th Century Map

In 821, the Chinese Emperor Hwang Te signed a peace treaty with the Tibetan ruler Tsenpo which stated “Both Tibet and China shall keep the country and frontiers of which they are now in possession. The whole region to the east of that being the country of Great China and the whole region to the west being assuredly the country of Great Tibet. From either side of that frontier, there shall be no warfare, no hostile invasions and no seizure of territory”

Tibet continued to be an independent empire till the middle of 9th Century when Imperial Tibet collapsed in the Era of Fragmentation and small warlords took over.

Tibet 9th Century Map

In the 12th Century, as Genghis Khan expanded his empire, Tibet was incorporated into the Mongol Empire, retaining nominal power over religious and regional political affairs, while the Mongols managed a structural and administrative rule over the region. The Sakya Lama became the first temporal ruler of Tibet.

Between 13th Century and 17th Century, Tibet witnessed a power struggle between various monasteries and sects. Some of the most notable amongst them was the Phagmodrupa, Rinpungpa and Tsangpa Dynasties. In 1578, Altan Khan of the Tümed Mongols gave Sonam Gyatso, a high lama of the Gelugpa School, the name Dalai Lama. From 1642 until 1705 and from 1750 to the 1950s, the Dalai Lamas or their regents headed the Tibetan government (or Ganden Phodrang) in Lhasa. No historical evidence exists that the Mongols had integrated Tibet and China. Tibet was de facto independent from the mid-14th century on, for nearly 400 years. The Ming dynasty which ruled China from 1368-1644 maintained friendly ties with Tibet; however, they had little influence over it. The Qing dynasty came to power in 1644 and ruled till 1912. In 1720 a Qing expeditionary force defeated Dzungars and gained control over Tibet. The Qing occupation of Tibet lasted till 1912 when it fell due to the Xinhai revolution.

The Chinese chronicles of Gaoseng Zhuan written in 6th Century and of Yuzhi Shenseng Zhuan written in 16th Century capture details of the Indian monks who went to China. However, they are completely silent on the visits of any Indian monk to Tibet; thereby lending credence to the theory that Tibet was an independent region.

After the fall of the Qing dynasty, the 13th Dalai Lama declared Tibet to be independent and defined the relationship between China and Tibet as “the existing relationship between Tibet and China had been that of patron and priest and had not been based on the subordination of one to the other.”

The last British Consul General in Lhasa, Hugh Richardson (1936-1949) wrote about Tibet’s status as “The Government of Lhasa with which I dealt was beyond question in complete control of its own affairs dealing directly with the Government of India in such matters as frontier disputes, trade questions, supply of arms and ammunition and so on. There was no Chinese participation whatsoever in such matters and no reference to them, nor were they informed. In all practical matters, the Tibetans were independent”

In 20th Century, Tibet had diplomatic relations with Mongolia, Nepal etc. Tibetan diplomats travelled on documents issued by the Tibetan government. A Tibetan passport of finance minister of Tibet; Tsepon W. D. Shakabpa had received visa and entry stamps from several countries and territories, including India, the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Italy, Switzerland, Pakistan, Iraq and Hong Kong. In 1947, a Tibetan trade mission visited India, China, USA and Britain.

Tibetan Passport

Thus, it can be seen clearly that Tibet existed as an independent region and the Chinese assertions that it had control over Tibet since the Yuan dynasty (1271-1368) are not borne out of supported historical facts.

In 1951 People’s Liberation Army entered Chamdo in Tibet and defeated the Tibetan army. Negotiations in Beijing between the Tibetans and the Chinese government resulted in a Seventeen Point Agreement which formalized China’s sovereignty over Tibet. Tibetans later claimed that the agreement was signed under duress.

In 1959, the 14th Dalai Lama fled from Chinese Occupation to India and established a government in exile at Dharamshala in India.

Indian Influence on Tibet

For centuries, India has had a deep influence on Tibet. Mount Kailash, Lake of Mansarovar and Rakshas, which are some of the holiest Hindu sites, are in Tibet. The Tibetan name for their land; Bod, is derived from the Sanskrit word Bhautta.

Shiva residing in Mount Kailash

Buddhism was introduced in Tibet in 5th Century during the reign of Thori Nyatsen, an event which changed it forever.

In 640 A.D. Songtsen Gompo sent his minister Thonmi Sambhota and 16 students to India to study Buddhism & Sanskrit. When they returned, they introduced a new script in Tibet which exists till today. Tibetan grammar is based on Sanskrit grammar which was in use in India in 7thCentury. Tibetan Kings sent scholars in large numbers to India to learn Buddhism. Besides Buddhism, they also learned medicine, astrology, linguistics and other sciences in India. The Tibetan system of medicine; Swa Rigpa, is heavily influenced by India.

Tsangyang Gyaltso, the 5th Dalai Lama, was born in the Indian State of Arunachal Pradesh. Tawang monastery in Arunachal Pradesh is the second largest monastery in the world.

With the rise of the Mughal Empire in India, Buddhism as a religion saw a decline in India and Indo-Tibet relations went into a decline.

India continued to be the preferred land for the Tibetans well into the early 1950s. Thus, it was not surprising that when the 14th Dalai Lama decided to flee Chinese oppression, he chose India.

India. Tibet. Dalai Lama

The Dalai Lama who is supposed to be the incarnation of Avalokiteśvara binds Tibetans worldwide.

From the 1st Dalai Lama, Gendun Drup (1391–1474) to the 14thDalai Lama, Lhamo Thondup (1940 – present); the institution of Dalai Lama has been a unifying force in Tibet. He has been instrumental in keeping various religious factions together, acted as the spiritual and also as the head of the Tibetan government from 1641-1705 and from 1750-1950s.

Dalai Lama

With Buddhism finding its way to Tibet from India, it is natural that India has had a profound influence on Tibet. The 5thDalai Lama was born in India and in 1959; the current Dalai Lama escaped Tibet and sought refuge in India.

The current Dalai Lama who considers India as his ‘spiritual home’ has stated “If we look back at the time when we came to exile in India, we had come to our spiritual home. In the minds of the six million Tibetans, India is our spiritual home”. At an event in March this year, he further stated that the next Dalai Lama may come from India. “In future, in case you see two Dalai Lamas come, one from here, in a free country, one is chosen by Chinese, then nobody will trust, nobody will respect (the one chosen by China). So that’s an additional problem for the Chinese! It’s possible, it can happen”, he said.

In 2000, Ogyen Trinley Dorje, the 17th Karmapa, also fled from China and sought refuge at Dharamsala in India. The Karmapa lineage predates the Dalai Lama by at least two centuries.

Karmapa – Ogyen Trinley Dorje

India and China: Two oldest civilizations

India and China boast of two of the ancient most civilizations of the world. The earliest mention of India as Sindhu appears when Chinese explorer Zhang Qian (164-114 BC) was visiting Central Asia.

Buddhism travelled nearly 2000 years ago from India to China and left an everlasting influence on its culture.

Leshan Buddha in China

In Chanakya’s Arthashastra (2nd Century – 3rd Century BC) there is mention of trade routes between India and China. The Silk Road was the route used for economic contact between the two regions. Scholars and Monks from both India and China regularly travelled from one region to the other, to study and learn. Fa-Hien, a Buddhist Monk travelled from China to India to collect Buddhist texts during 399-412 AD. Nalanda University in India was most sought out by monks from China to study and learn Buddhism.

Fa Hien travel across India

The cultural exchanges continued through the 7th, 8th and 10th Century when the Cholas controlled a large part of India. The Cholas enjoyed a good trading relationship with the Chinese Song Dynasty and established a shipping route.

Chola Dynasty and China

The Ming Dynasty (1405-1433) under Admiral Zheng He sent several naval expeditions to India. Bengal too sent several diplomatic missions to Nanjing (1405-1439).

The saga of McMahon Line

Tibet had remained an independent region for centuries with little or no Chinese influence or dominance. The Qing dynasty in the 17th Century had managed to exert Chinese dominance over Tibet. With the fall of the Qing dynasty in 1913, Tibet declared itself as an independent nation.

At the Simla conference (October 1913–July 1914) attended by Sir Henry McMahon, the Foreign Secretary of British India & Lonchen Satra the representative of the government of Tibet, a demarcation line between Tibetan Region and British India known as the ‘McMahon Line’ was negotiated. The participants included delegates from China. Article 2 of the Simla Accord stated “The Governments of Great Britain and China recognising that Tibet is under the suzerainty of China, and recognising also the autonomy of Outer Tibet, engage to respect the territorial integrity of the country, and to abstain from interference in the administration of Outer Tibet (including the selection and installation of the Dalai Lama), which shall remain in the hands of the Tibetan Government at Lhasa. The Government of China engages not to convert Tibet into a Chinese province. The Government of Great Britain engages not to annex Tibet or any portion of it.”

McMohan Line

Though it is currently the effective boundary between China and India, its legal status is disputed by the Chinese government. Even the Chinese maps of the time referred to the area as Tibet Autonomous Region. Chinese maps of the early 18th century also reflect Tibet separately.

Interestingly, though China has accepted the McMahon Line as the border between itself and Burma, it refuses to accept the same with India because that would tantamount to China accepting Tibet as a separate and independent nation.

Panchen Lama

After the Communist Party came to power in China in 1949, Nehru tried to have friendly ties with it, being the first to give it diplomatic recognition. Declaration of McMahon line as the border in 1950 by Nehru did not raise any concern by the Chinese. In 1954, under Panchsheel, India accepted Tibet as part of China and gave up the historical rights it had acquired from the British rule. India presented a frontier map which was accepted by China, and the slogan “Hindi-Chini Bhai-Bhai “ was promoted.

Historical records now reveal that in 1956, the Chinese Premier Zhou Enlai had proposed a boundary settlement between India and China which closely mirrored the McMahon Line. However, when in 1959 the 14th Dalai Lama fled to India from Lhasa, China retaliated by including both the North East Frontier Area (NEFA) and Aksai Chin as Chinese territories. In 1961 Nehru ordered the Indian Army to set up forward posts to safeguard India’s border. In 1962, China responded by attacking Indian posts around the McMahon Line and marched southwards. After the hostilities ended in 1963, China withdrew back to the McMahon Line.

India China and Tibet’s future

India and China continue to have an unsettled border which often results in clashes between the two armies. Regular violation at the Line of Actual Control leads to face off for extended durations.

China has often laid claim to large Indian territories which include Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh etc. Chinese maps often show Arunachal Pradesh as Chinese territory and China used to offer stapled visas to Indians from Arunachal Pradesh. China is particularly sensitive to the Indian town of Tawang which has the biggest Buddhist monastery outside of Lhasa.

China is also in possession of nearly 35,000 Kms of Aksai Chin which India considers as its own territory.

In the last 5 decades, China has used brutal force to clamp down on the Tibetan independence movement. It also calls the 14thDalai Lama “a political exile engaged in anti-China separatist activities under the disguise of religion”. In March this year, China termed Dalai Lama a “dangerous secessionist” who undermines “One China Policy” thereby implying that Taiwan, Xinjiang and Tibet are integral parts of China. China has also asserted that any future reincarnation of Dalai Lama would have to pursue Chinese laws & regulations. It has insisted that it has the right to appoint the successor of the current Dalai Lama.

With a political motive to control Tibetan Buddhism, China in November 1995 forcibly took away six-year-old Gedhun Choekyi Nyima who had been named as the 11th Panchen Lama by the Dalai Lama. He and his entire family have never been seen ever since. 28th April 2019 marked the 30th birthday of the missing Panchen Lama who has now spent 24 years in Chinese captivity.

Tibetan, British and Chinese participants and plenipotentiaries to the Simla Treaty in 1914

Today Beijing wants to wipe out all proof that Tibet was once an independent nation even though it is blatantly clear that there is a clear distinction between the Chinese and Tibetans.

Tibetans are essentially looking at an existential crisis post the 14th Dalai Lama. With China hell-bent on seizing control of all things religious and spiritual concerning Tibet, Tibetans may soon face a loss of identity. Tibetans need a reawakening of their soul culturally, intellectually, spiritually which is not limited to only monasteries in India.

To avoid earning Chinese wrath and to secure better trade deals, the world has long been indifferent towards the plight of the Tibetans.

With an expansionist China nibbling away at territories of all its neighbours (currently, China has territorial disputes with Japan, India, Indonesia, Bhutan, N Korea, Taiwan, Vietnam, Philippines, Malaysia, and Brunei ); the Indo-Chinese border dispute will get even more vexed. India is also at a danger of losing its biggest lever over China, that of a weakened Dalai Lama, fighting for Tibetan existence, who is revered by Tibetans and Buddhists across the world. This has serious implications for India as it hosts the largest settlement of Tibetans outside Lhasa.

India needs to stand together with the Tibetan people who have reposed their faith in India’s leadership for the last 6 decades and fight for the diplomatic rights of the Tibetans which are acknowledged in the 1961 UNGA resolution. India’s stand on the border dispute is supported by historical facts; China, on the other hand, keeps shifting the goalposts. Both India and China need to stick to the 1993 “Agreement on the Maintenance of Peace and Tranquility along the Line of Actual Control”.

It is imperative that the two oldest civilizations and nuclear powers maintain a relationship which is based on mutual respect, equality and justice. Self Determination or Autonomy of 6 million Tibetans is central to any such agreement.

(This article has been co-authored by Ishita Sen and Krishna Kant Sharma)

Faultlines in Mahagathbandhan: SP and BSP workers beat each other up during joint rally of Akhilesh and Mayawati

The incongruity between the Mahagathbandhan parties in Uttar Pradesh came to the fore as the SP and BSP workers in the Mahagathbandhan rally in Uttar Pradesh’s Ghazipur exchanged blows with each other. The brawl broke out ahead of the BSP supremo Mayawati and SP chief Akhilesh Yadav’s joint rally in Ghazipur.


As can be seen in the video, the workers of the two parties, SP and BSP, who were present at the venue engaged in skirmishes ahead of the Mahagathbandhan rally in Ghazipur.

Akhilesh Yadav and Mayawati were to jointly address the election rally in support of Afzal Ansari of Quami Ekta Dal who is a Mahagathbandhan candidate against Cabinet minister Manoj Sinha. Akhilesh Yadav has finally buried the hatchet and decided to canvass for votes for Ansari, who was once denied permission to merge his party, Qaumi Ekta Dal, with the SP.

In 2016, during the infamous Chacha-Bhatija feud, Shivpal Yadav had announced the merger of Quami Ekta Dal with the SP. However, the SP parliamentary board denied the merger. This was one of the significant reasons for the widening rift between Akhilesh Yadav and Shivpal Yadav.

The faultlines between SP and BSP also runs deep. In June 1995, when BSP had announced taking back its support from the Mulayam government, she was attacked by SP goons inside the Meerabai guesthouse in Lucknow. Reports say that the goons had beaten her up and had torn up her clothes when BJP MLA Bhahmadutt Dwivedi had to risked his life to fight with the goons and rescue Mayawati. Mayawati and Mulayam had been archenemies since then. But the emergence of Modi had even forced the bitter enemies with seemingly disparate political ideologies to shun their differences and join hands with each other.

The tussle between the SP and BSP activists reveals the internal bickering among the Mahagathbandhan parties who are not only facing a stiff challenge from the BJP but also from their own alliance partners. The motley group of Mahagathbandhan parties have little in common and the only thread that unites them is their collective fear of losing relevance in the face of another Modi rule at the centre.

Navjot Sidhu once again damages his vocal chord due to excessive talking, advised drugs and rest

The election season has taken a toll on Congress leader Navjot Singh Sidhu who has once again damaged his vocal cords after addressing back to back 80 campaign rallies in a span of 28 days, his office has informed.

The cricketer-turned-politician has been administered with steroids and injections and advised complete rest for 48 hours.


“Navjot Singh Sidhu has been put on steroid medication and injections due to continuous speech damaging his vocal cords. At the moment, Mr Sidhu is under the medication and in the process of a quick recovery to return back to campaigning at the earliest,” Sidhu’s office said.

An official release read, “Punjab Cabinet Minister Navjot Singh Sidhu campaigned across the country, addressing 80 rallies in 28 days. Continuous speaking has severely impacted his vocal cords to the extent that they bled at times.”

“Sidhu consulted physicians on early Sunday morning in Chandigarh, who advised two alternatives, either a balm coating over his damaged throat, which would require him not to speak for four days or a severe measure of anti-inflammatory injections and steroid medication along with complete rest for 48 hours,” it read.

“He chose anti-inflammatory injections and steroids to rest for just two days because balm coating would have hampered his ability to speak for the next four days,” the release said.

Meanwhile, it is being said that Sidhu insisted on campaigning for the last phase of the Lok Sabha elections to be held on May 19.

In December last year, Sidhu had undergone treatment for a similar problem after an extensive 17-day campaign for the assembly election, where Congress leader Navjot Singh Sidhu, reportedly addressed more than 70 back to back public meetings. He had damaged his vocal cords then too and had gone off to an undisclosed location for complete rest and treatment.

Prior to this, Sidhu suffered from DVT and went through an embolism treatment, as it was reported that extensive travelling had proved detrimental for his health.

Navjot Singh Sidhu who has has been surrounded by immense controversies due to his activities and statements regarding his bonhomie with Pakistani leaders is lately playing the racist card and minority appeasement quirk, which is typically the Congress party’s tilt to take on the BJP government this election season.

Recently, addressing a rally in Rohtak, Congress leader Navjot Singh Sidhu, who had vouched to quit politics if Rahul Gandhi loses Amethi to BJP’s Smriti Irani, was attacked by a woman with her footwear for speaking against PM Narendra Modi.

Nathuram Godse was not a terrorist, much less a Hindu Terrorist, and using him to demonize Hindus is a cheap tactic

In the 21st Century, it has become fashionable of sorts to attribute all manners of causes and motivations to Nathuram Godse for his assassination of Mahatma Gandhi. Over the years, he has merely become a stick to beat Hindutvavadis with and an excuse to exclude the Hindu Right from the corridors of power.

It has become par for the course to demonize Godse beyond all measure. Because the target is not Godse himself, he is dead, but every politically conscious Hindu alive. Thus, we have people like Kamal Haasan who says, “The first terrorist in independent India is a Hindu, his name is Nathuram Godse.”

Quite interestingly enough, there are some people who saw certain merits to the assassination of Gandhi. B.R. Ambedkar, of all people, was of the opinion that ultimately, the death of Gandhi would have a positive impact upon the future of the country.

He once wrote to Laxmi Kabir, who he subsequently married, “My own view is that great men are of great service to their country, but they are also at certain times a great hindrance to the progress of the country. Mr Gandhi had become a positive danger to this country. He had choked all the thoughts. He was holding together the Congress which is a combination of all the bad and self-seeking elements in society who agreed on no social or moral principle governing the life of society except the one of praising and flattering Mr Gandhi. Such a body is unfit to govern a country. As the Bible says that sometimes good cometh out of evil, so also I think good will come out of the death of Mr Gandhi. It will release people from bondage to supermen, it will make them think for themselves and compel them to stand on their own merits.”

Kamal Haasan is the most recent politician to claim Godse was a Hindu terrorist but he is certainly not the first. To repeat myself again here, the target isn’t Godse, the target is every Hindutvavadi and therefore it’s quite necessary to clearly outline what Godse’s actions were and what they weren’t and what it can be called.

First and foremost, let us evaluate whether Godse can actually be called a terrorist. This is not to pass moral judgment on his actions but an objective evaluation of the category his actions can be classified under. As it so happens, there are no universally accepted definitions of terrorism. And that is a problem. However, there are certain definitions from global institutions which can be relied upon to get a fair idea of the matter.

The United Nations Security Council Resolution 1566 defines Terrorism as “criminal acts, including against civilians, committed with the intent to cause death or serious bodily injury, or taking of hostages, with the purpose to provoke a state of terror in the general public or in a group of persons or particular persons, intimidate a population or compel a government or an international organization to do or to abstain from doing any act, which constitute offences within the scope of and as defined in the international conventions and protocols relating to terrorism, are under no circumstances justifiable by considerations of a political, philosophical, ideological, racial, ethnic, religious or other similar nature.”

NATO’s definition is much shorter. It defines terrorism as, “The unlawful use or threatened use of force or violence against individuals or property in an attempt to coerce or intimidate governments or societies to achieve political, religious or ideological objectives”.

The Supreme Court of India in a 2003 ruling (Madan Singh vs. the State of Bihar), adopted Alex P. Schmid’s definition of terrorism “defin[ing] acts of terrorism veritably as ‘peacetime equivalents of war crimes”. The United States of America defines terrorism as the “premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant targets by subnational groups or clandestine agents.“

Therefore, certain critical features emerge from these various definitions of terrorism:

  1. It’s directed against civilians.
  2. The goal is to kill, maim and injure a maximum number of people.
  3. The intent is to instil a sense of fear within the larger population.
  4. Acts of Terrorism are attempts to coerce governments into giving in to the demands of the perpetrators.
  5. The aims of terrorist activities are to create, maximize, and continuously shift the parameters of uncertainty, confusion, insecurity, and fear.
  6. Terrorists usually have certain political objectives.

Thus, it appears clear that apart from political motives in a very broad sense, Godse’s actions do not conform with the core features of terrorist activities. From what is known to the common public and we can be fairly certain as even his worst critics haven’t made these claims about his actions, Godse did not want to inflict physical injuries or kill a large number of people, he did not want to instil a sense of fear in anyone and he did not want to coerce any government into following his diktats. He did not want to create chaos either and neither was Gandhi an ordinary civilian, Gandhi was a political leader with immense power. Therefore, it can be safely concluded that Godse wasn’t a terrorist.

With regards to what category best fits Godse’s actions, it is the most common term that is used to describe Gandhi’s death that describes his actions best: Assassination. By definition, assassination is the act of killing a person in a position of authority for political, religious or monetary gains. To be clear, assassination is a technique that is used by many terrorist organizations to achieve their desired objective. However, the act in itself is not terrorism. Motivations matter.

Unfortunately, we may never know what Godse’s true motivations were because previous governments made sure that his voice was silenced forever. Because it’s much easier to demonize an entity that has no voice to defend itself. The only source of knowledge we do have of his motivations comes from a book by G.D. Khosla, one of the Judges who passed the judgment of his death. The book is reproduced on a website dedicated to celebrating the life of Mahatma Gandhi.

From the accounts produced by Khosla in his book, it becomes abundantly clear that Godse’s grouse is with Gandhi and Gandhi alone and no one else. It’s also quite evident that Godse is a product of his times, a time in history that witnessed immense bloodshed, millions of Hindus were slaughtered and millions of others were displaced. And he held Gandhi to be responsible for it and thus, set out to eliminate him. Therefore, we ought to ask ourselves, can a grudge against a particular individual, a single powerful individual, be called terrorism?

Khosla recalls Godse as saying, “Gandhiji began to hold his prayers meetings in a Hindu temple in Bhangi Colony and persisted in reading passages from the Koran as a part of the prayer in that Hindu temple, in spite of the protest of the Hindu worshippers there. Of course, he dared not read Geeta in a mosque in the teeth of Muslim opposition. He knew what a terrible Muslim reaction there would have been if he had done so. But he could safely trample over the feelings of the tolerant Hindu. To belie this belief I determined to prove to Gandhiji that the Hindu too could be intolerant when his honour was insulted.”

At another point, Godse says, “Gandhiji in fact succeeded in doing what the British always wanted to do in pursuance of their policy of ‘Divide and Rule’. He helped them in dividing India and it is not yet certain whether their rule has ceased.”

Another reason Godse cites is that Gandhi started exerting disproportionate influence over government policy. According to him, the Congress party was being held hostage by Gandhi. “He alone was the judge of everyone and everything, “Godse is quoted as saying by Khosla, and that according to him was a huge problem as “the Congress had to surrender its will to his, and had to be content with playing the second fiddle to all his eccentricity, whimsicality, metaphysics and primitive vision.”

At another point, Godse says, “In a position of such absolute irresponsibility Gandhiji was guilty of blunder after blunder, failure after failure and disaster after disaster. No one single political victory can be claimed to his credit during 33 years of his political predominance.” Thus, quite clearly, Godse has no other motivations apart from taking Gandhi out of the equation as he believed the latter was a hindrance to the prosperity of the country.

Godse was fully aware of the consequences of his actions and knew that he would be ruined completely. He knew that his name and reputation would be tarnished beyond recognition for all eternity. But he did it anyway because of his personal conviction.

Source: The Murder of the Mahatma by G.D. Khosla

Therefore, I again ask the question, what kind of terrorism is it if the action is centred around the assassination of a single individual? What kind of terrorism is it that targets only a single individual and makes no attempt to target anyone else at all? But we all know the answer to that question, don’t we?

The objective of people like Kamal Haasan and others who call Godse a terrorist is not the vilification of Godse himself. Godse is long gone and received just punishment for his actions. No, the purpose here is to demonize people who believe Hindus are being disenfranchised in their own land. The goal here is to silence debates around the matter and indulge in the character assassination of individuals who remotely speak for Hindu interests. It’s a childish tactic. “You think Hindus are being disenfranchised? Do you know who else believed the same thing? Godse! Yeah! And you are, therefore, a Godse apologist!” It’s like accusing someone of being a fascist because he, like Hitler, drinks water.

Of course, there’s another objective as well. The other objective is to put Hinduism on the same pedestal as Abrahamic faiths. Terrorism and genocides inspired by Christianity and Islam have been fairly common throughout history, the same cannot be said for Hinduism. Therefore, to force fit the “All Religions are the same theory” of secularists, same examples have to be found in Hinduism as well. Therefore, liberals have been working in overdrive to find the same examples in Hinduism. Thus, we have vigilantism inspired mob lynchings, which are terrible crimes in themselves but certainly not terrorism, being labelled as such. And now, we have political assassinations, directed as a single individual, being labelled as terrorism by the same crowd.

The larger objective, of course, is to take away the inherent superiority that Hinduism has over Monotheistic faiths in terms of how it regulates violence and such. Thus, it’s no wonder that the same people who are the first to scream “Terrorism has no religion” whenever a Muslim commits a mass massacre are the ones who call Godse a Hindu Terrorist.

Again, just to be clear, the objective of this article is not to justify Godse’s actions or give him a free pass. Actions have consequences and Godse paid the price for his actions with his life. The punishment he received was just. But to put him on the same category as people who make sex slaves out of women, slaughter people with no political power whatsoever, mercilessly, to achieve political ends, make terrorists out of children and dedicate their entire lives to killing as many people as they can, is doing great disservice to the actual victims of terrorism and all those women who are currently being held captive by Islamic terrorists as sex slaves.

Liberals can screech and whine all they want but saying that Godse wasn’t a terrorist doesn’t mean someone his justifying his actions. It only means the person values objectivity and truth over political brownie points.

“Diggy Raja you have committed a big sin”, PM Modi slams Digvijay Singh for not casting his vote

Prime Minister Narendra Modi hit out senior Congress leader and Bhopal Lok Sabha candidate Digvijay Singh who skipped casting his vote yesterday in Rajgarh, Madhya Pradesh. He said that the Congress leader did not feel the need to cast his vote.


While addressing an election rally in Ratlam Madhya Pradesh, PM Modi slammed Digvijay Singh and said that even the President and the Vice-President of the country were standing in queues to cast their vote. “Diggy Raja you have committed a big sin…in the festival of democracy, the President, Vice President stood in queues to cast their votes, but Diggy Raja did not,” he said.

“His arrogance came to light yesterday in Bhopal. When people are electing their representatives and even I exercised my franchise in Ahmedabad, Diggy Raja neither cared for democracy nor people,” PM Modi said attacking the former CM of MP.

He also said that Digvijay Singh is setting a wrong example for the youths and first-time voters of the country by implying that voting is not necessary.

Polling in Singh’s constituency Bhopal was held yesterday during the sixth phase of the Lok Sabha election. Singh who urged voters to vote in large numbers had been visiting the polling stations in his constituency and skipped casting his vote. He said that he regretted not casting his vote but he would vote next time. “Yes I couldn’t go to vote to Rajgarh and I regret it. Next time I will register my name in Bhopal”, Singh said.

Digvijay Singh is contesting against BJP candidate Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur.

As Twitter trends #PappuQuotes, here is our Top Ten list to brighten your Monday afternoon

Rahul Gandhi, the Congress president has been a constant source of entertainment in the dull hustle and bustle of Indian politics. While he has been “coming of age” since 2009 according to the Lutyens media, the one thing that has remained constant through the years is his hilarious gaffes. On a Monday, right after the sixth phase of 2019 Lok Sabha elections, Netizens decided to revisit the endless episodes of entertainment that Rahul Gandhi had selflessly delivered over the years.

Here is a list of the top 10 gaffes that is our favourite.

10. Khet ke paas aloo ki factory

One of the brightest ideas to emanate from the beautiful mind of Rahul Gandhi was when he promised farmers that if they harvest potatoes, there will be an aloo ki factory right next to their farmland. The number of factories that Rahul Gandhi has promised to set up is math that team OpIndia cannot dare to do.


9. Har hafte ek bachcha

From talking about numerous potatoes factories to talking about women like baby making machines, Rahul Gandhi certainly evolved in his speech delivering skills. Rahul Gandhi had once said that Uttar Pradesh has the kind of women who can deliver one child every week. That would mean each woman, according to Rahul Gandhi, has the potential to deliver 52 children every year. Enough to populate a whole new planet with the escape velocity of Jupiter. Listen in:


8. Kumbhkaran Lift Yojana 

Once upon a time, Rahul Gandhi said that Ashok Gehlot had started Kumbhakaran Lift Yojana for the people of Rajasthan. Soon after someone off the camera corrected him after which Rahul Gandhi said that he meant Kumbha Ram Lift Yojana. Not a dull moment when Rahul Gandhi talks!


7. ‘Aise hila’ and more

Rahul Gandhi delivered one of the most legendary Parliament speeches once. In that one speech, he jerked uncontrollably to say that after Arun Jaitley made his speech, that is what his physical reaction was. He followed that up with some other gaffes like misquoting the price of petrol. He also forgot the name of a scheme that his family has been touting as the ultimate social justice tool. Listen in:


6. Factories with nervous systems 

In one of his legendary talks, Rahul Gandhi explained how earlier, factories were only made of concrete and bricks, but now in China, factories have a nervous system. We don’t know about China, but the anchor sure seemed nervous at this startling revelation.


5. Look at the world not from your position, but from your position

This one is rather self-explanatory.


4. Your power is my power 

Rahul Gandhi said “America has power, Japan has power. In the connective world, It is problematic because your power is my power”. Now we would really like to mock this one, but literally, are no words (mostly because we have not the slightest clue about what he means).


3. We want to listen to the ocean and work with the ocean 

Yes. Rahul Gandhi wants to listen to the ocean. Talk to the ocean and work with the ocean.


2. We don’t even know how to subtitle this one 

“Mere pass list hai ki Modi ne 5 crore 55 hazaar rupaiye diye, to agar wo 15……5 lakh 55 hazaar de sakte hai… to hum 25 crore 5 lakh 55 hazaar de sakte hai”


1. Congress will ensure that farmers can sell their crops to medical shops

We might be criticised for making this our number 1 favourite and not the others. The truth is, the numbering is a mere formality. Every nugget of wisdom that comes out of Rahul Gandhi’s mouth is precious.

This one, however, simply takes the cake. Rahul Gandhi wanted to ensure that farmers can sell their produce directly to medicine shops.


While we thank Netizens for brightening up a boring Monday afternoon, we also clarify that we are in no way being disrespectful to other gems that have come out of Rahul Gandhi’s mouth. This is merely an indicative list of our favourites as the full list might take a while to compile.

PM Modi slams Mayawati for her continued support to Rajasthan government even after Alwar gang-rape case

PM Modi in a rally in Uttar Pradesh slammed BSP supremo Mayawati saying that she should stop shedding crocodile tears on the predicament of the Alwar gang-rape victim and instead withdraw her support to the Rajasthan government if she is sincere to the cause of Dalits in the country. Congress has formed a government in Rajasthan with the support of Mayawati’s BSP.


Earlier today, when Mayawati was asked about her stand on Alwar rape case, Mayawati dragged PM Modi’s wife into politics. Mayawati had said that how can Prime Minister Modi respect others’ sisters and wives when he has abandoned his own wife “for political gains”. She then said, “I have heard that the wives of the BJP leaders are afraid whenever their husbands go to him. They are afraid that the way Modi abandoned his wife, he will separate us from our husbands too.” She then appealed to the women of the country to not vote for ‘such a man.’

On Saturday, Mayawati had convened a presser in which she censured the Congress administration and police in the Rajasthan state for delaying the filing of FIR in the Alwar rape case and had asked the Supreme Court to take tough action against the government for suppressing the victim’s voice for political benefits.

A Dalit woman was gang-raped in Rajasthan’s Alwar on April 26, 2019. A clip of the rape was circulated by her attackers which provoked outrage and protest across the state. The police were informed of the rape on April 30. Her husband had then alleged that the police didn’t file an FIR on April 30 but delayed it till May 7, 2019, after the elections in the state got over on May 6, 2019.

It is noteworthy to mention that though BSP is in alliance with SP in Uttar Pradesh, leaving out Congress, in states such as Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan, Mayawati had extended her support to Congress in the assembly elections in 2018. However, she has also maintained that she doesn’t support the ideology espoused by Congress and is supporting them only to keep BJP out of power.