Rafale: SC examined the pricing details closely, ‘did not rely’ on CAG report as claimed by Rahul Gandhi

However, the Central Government today filed a writ petition for correction and directions regarding the judgement so that the scope of misinterpretation is eliminated.

The Supreme Court in its verdict on the Rafale deal yesterday dismissed all petitions for investigation citing that perception of an individual is not reason enough for the Supreme Court to interfere. The apex court in its verdict had observed that the pricing of the jets had been shared with the CAG (Comptroller and Auditor General) and the CAG report was examined by the PAC (Public Accounts Committee).

However, PAC Chairman senior Congress leader Mallikarjun Kharge had claimed that he had never seen the report. Kharge had accused the central government of ‘misleading’ the Supreme Court by presenting wrong facts regarding the CAG report. He accused the government of ‘feeding wrong information’ to the Supreme Court.

Congress President Rahul Gandhi went on an offensive and said that the SC verdict was based on the CAG report which was never discussed by the PAC as it appeared in the judgement.

- Advertisement - - Article resumes -

This is not true. In the judgement pronounced yesterday, the Supreme Court had clearly mentioned that the government had shared the pricing details with the Supreme Court.

SC verdict stating that the court had examined the pricing details.

The Court was slightly on the secretive side while talking about the pricing, obviously, for national security concerns. The court, however, did say that it was compared the price of the previous deal and current deal and suffices to say that the official respondents say there is a financial benefit to the country.

This shows that the Supreme Court verdict was not based only on the CAG report.

However, the Central Government today filed a writ petition for correction and directions regarding the judgement so that the scope of misinterpretation is eliminated.

Writ Petition filed by the central government

Writ Petition filed by the central government

In the petition, the government says that perhaps the Supreme Court misinterpreted the note submitted by the government in a sealed cover in compliance with the order dated 31st October 2018. Referring to paragraph 25 of the judgement, the Government shares part of the note it had shared with the SC.

Writ Petition filed by the central government

The government explains that the details of pricing shared with the CAG is in the past tense, and it is factually correct. Second part of the point talks about the CAG report being examined by the PAC. The note said “the report of the CAG is examined by the PAC”, however, the judgement replaces “is” with “has been”, reading it as ‘the report of the CAG has been examined by the PAC”.

The Government has explained that the meaning of the term CAG report “is” examined by the PAC was the description of the procedure followed when it comes to CAG reports. That the term “is” used in present tense since it means what would be the procedure followed as and when the CAG report is ready.

Writ Petition filed by the central government

That the note of government was misinterpreted by the SC and it has led to a huge controversy in the public domain where many people have raised doubts over the fairness of the Supreme Court. To that, the government has requested the Supreme Court to make the appropriate changes in the order.

Writ Petition filed by the central government

The government, in its petition, also requested the Supreme Court to pass further orders it deems just and proper so as to end the controversy.

Hence, while the Central Government has filed a petition for correction in the Supreme Court verdict, the judgement would still hold since it is formed on the basis of pricing details examined by the Court and not just the CAG report.

Share This Post and Support:
We need your support to survive in the media industry. Please consider paying us for the content we produce:

To know more about these payments, please click here.

Most read articles recently

NC Lok Sabha candidate Akbar Lone begins a rally with ‘Pakistan Zindabad’, says will abuse anyone who abuses Pakistan

Akbar Lone, NC Lok Sabha candidate for Baramulla, said that the country across is a Muslim country and abusing Pakistan would mean he is abusing himself
Owner of AAP propaganda blog agitated when Sushma Swaraj stands up for two underage Hindu girls

AAP propaganda site owner gets angry after India expresses concerns over atrocities against Hindus in Pakistan

Sushma Swaraj's move to seek details of the Incident had agitated quite a few people in Pakistan, including their Information and Broadcasting minister Ch Fawad Hussain, who saw it as an intervention in Pakistan's internal matters.

Actor R Madhavan offers support to PM Modi to urge voters to cast votes in elections, gets trolled by ‘liberals’

Because of their sheer bitterness for Modi, these cynics are in no mood to spare anyone who comes out in support of Modi

Where is the money? Rahul Gandhi’s promise is going to cost a whopping Rs 3.60 lakh crore a year, 13% of union budget

Minimum Income Guarantee Scheme of Congress party ensures monthly income of Rs 12,000 for 20% of India's population
Malala has maintained a conspicuous silence over atrocities on Hindu girls in her country

Nobel Peace Prize winner Malala’s silence on abduction and forceful conversion of two Hindu girls is deafening

Malala, who often preaches the world about feminist adventures and jumps in to display her intellect over human rights issues especially against women across the world seems to have not found her voice to condemn the bigotry of Pakistanis as she could face severe backlash within her own country.

After ‘Modi removed your name from voter list’, AAP allegedly calls up people pretending to be radio channel

'Who will you vote for?' People speculate if Aam Aadmi Party call centre is up to new trick again

Uttar Pradesh: Congress leader Rashid Alvi withdraws candidature from Amroha because ‘he did not want to lose’

According to some reports Rashid Alvi was reluctant to contest from the Amroha seat against the strong candidates of the BJP and the BSP.
Chandrababu Naidu govt accused of misusing temple funds, allocates Rs 5 crores for mosque repairs and Iftaar parties

Chandrababu Naidu calls PM Modi a ‘demon’, JDS MLA wants to ‘crush jaws’ of Modi supporters: Politics in India reaches a new low

Crush the jaws of those who come and shout 'Modi, Modi': JDS MLA Shivaling Gowda said while addressing a public gathering
Pakistani Hindus plight

Why can’t Pakistani Hindus go to Europe or America as refugees if Syrians and Rohingyas can?

Countries like Canada and Sweden welcome refugees who are persecuted, but why do Pakistan Hindus fail to get this helping hand?

Latest articles

Connect with us


Don't miss these

Share This Post and Support: