Home Blog Page 1235

‘I will use this to cut meat during Ramzan’: Javed discloses Sajid bought new knife just before killing Hindu children Ayush and Ahaan

After the arrest of absconding Javed in the Badaun murder case, new details have emerged. Javed’s brother Sajid who mercilessly slaughtered two children Aayush and Ahaan on the evening of 19th March in Uttar Pradesh’s Badaun, reportedly bought a fresh knife before committing the crime. He claimed that the knife would be utilised to chop meat during the Islamic holy month when his brother and the second accused Javed inquired about it.

Speaking to the media, Badaun Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP) Alok Priyadarshi discussed the details emerged after Javed’s interrogation. The perpetrator mentioned that Sajid had been running his shop in front of the victims’ residence for the previous four to five years and the two sides knew each other.

Javed informed that on the fateful day, Sajid came to their barber shop as usual in the morning and proceeded to serve customers with haircuts and shaving. Around ten o’clock in the morning, he complained that he was feeling unwell and left. He then returned at around 1 pm and again claimed to be unwell. Afterwards which Sajid and Javed shut down the barber shop and went back to Sakhanu village where their family home is located.

Javed informed police that in their home, Sajid was talking about having meat for lunch. Later in the day they had returned to their shop in Badaun. He had purchased a new knife and Javed asked him about it. Sajid allegedly replied that Ramzan is going on and they can use the knife to cut meat. Later in the day, Sajid suggested that they should visit the house of the children Ayush and Ahaan, as they were known to the family.

Javed unveiled to the police that he was just waiting outside the place with a bike and had nothing to do with the crime. According to the police, Sajid’s wife did not have a child despite their four years of marriage and the couple had marital issues. Sajid’s family members have also been questioned by the police. His father alleged that Sajid had been sick since he was a child and he used to take him to multiple pirs (Muslim spiritual healers) and the mausoleum of Chhote Sarkar-Bade Sarkar in Badaun. Sajid’s mother spent several days with him in the shrine when he became unwell at the age of ten, per the authorities.

The police stated that they were looking into Sajid’s ailment and noted that he had an aggressive temperament. There were moments when he was uncontrollably angry. He had once consumed rat poison in anger to kill himself, as per reports. Police officials are of the opinion that Sajid had already decided to kill the children before he went to their house. Alok Priyadarshi conveyed that all of the details provided by people about the instance will be compiled and examined. The family of the Hindu youngsters who died will also be questioned thoroughly about the same.

Sajid and Javed, who ran a barbershop in Badaun, murdered two Hindu boys Aayush and Ahaan alias Honey on the evening of 19th March. After the murders, the culprits absconded from the scene. Sajid was eliminated in an encounter with the state police the same day while Javed was arrested from Bareilly after he surrendered on the night of 20th March. The accused also tried to kill Piyush, the brother of the victims, but he managed to escape with injuries. The victim family has stated that they have no idea what prompted Sajid to commit such a crime and that he had been familiar with them, even had asked for financial help citing his wife’s medical issues.

Yakub Menon rehash: Local Muslims in large numbers show up to give hero farewell to Sajid, who slaughtered two Hindu children in Badaun

0

While the nation is still reeling from the horrific double murder of two Hindu children in Uttar Pradesh’s Badaun district, the Muslims in the hamlet chose to give a ‘hero farewell’ to the slain accused Sajid, who ruthlessly butchered the two minors. Sajid and Javed had stabbed the two Hindu kids Ayush and Ahaan 23 times after slitting their throats on the evening of March 19. Turning a blind eye to the sheer savagery displayed by the accused, thousands of people from the Muslim community joined the funeral procession of Sajid. On March 22, social media was rife with pictures of his funeral procession.

Sajid was buried on Thursday (March 21, 2024). His funeral procession was taken out through the Sakhanu village, located approximately 13 kilometres from Badaun. Sajid was a native of the Sakhanu village. Before this, his post-mortem was also done. After post-mortem, the body was handed over to his relatives. The surrounding Muslim population had come in large numbers for Sajid’s funeral.

After videos and photos of the funeral procession went viral, several Netizens expressed their rage. “Sajid slit the throats of eleven year-old Ayush and six year-old Ahaan and then reportedly drank their blood. In the holy month of Ramzan. This is the scene from his funeral,” Dr Anand Ranganathan wrote while expressing his anger at the callousness and apathy displayed by the Muslims of the village.

Another social media, aghast at the apathy shown by the Muslim community over the brutal murder of two innocent children, shared the picture of Sajid’s funeral procession with the caption, “Watch the funeral procession of the child murderer- Mohammad Sajid in Badaun. Thousands of people are at the funeral procession of Mohammad Sajid. What message does this picture convey?”

Someone else commented, “So much crowd at the funeral of Sajid, the killer of innocent children? It’s as if Sajid has accomplished a significant assignment. This is why there is such a large attendance at his funeral. Think for yourself and decide how many of those in attendance are good and how many are criminals themselves.

Those who are enraged at the apathy of these Muslims, who were practically celebrating the deaths of the two innocent Hindu children by paying a ‘hero farewell’ to their killer, should keep in mind how ‘liberals’ and Islamists from all over the country flocked to the streets nine years ago in 2015 to pay their last homage to Yakub Memon, the 1993 Mumbai bomb blasts convict.

Yakub Memon was convicted for the 1993 Mumbai bomb blasts and was sentenced to death. In 2015, the death sentence was carried out after his mercy petition was rejected. He was buried on July 30, 2015, at Bada Cemetery in South Mumbai. Thousands of Islamists and ‘liberals’ had descended on the streets of Mumbai to give Yakub, who was the only convict awarded the death penalty, a hero farewell. Not only this but an attempt was also made to turn Yakub’s grave into a tomb. LED lights had reportedly been put on this marble-covered grave and reports said that it was being guarded 24 hours a day.

Sajid also butchered two innocent kids. Javed, his brother, himself, attested to this. However, what happened? Was there any outrage? Did his community abandon Sajid? Is his community ashamed of what he did? Is there any hashtag like #AshamedAsAMuslim being trended on social media? Has anyone from the usual leftist-liberal cabal posted cartoons or images featuring knives, razors, blood, etc. on any Islamic symbols, all of which they undoubtedly would have done if the circumstances had been reversed, i.e., if the perpetrator had been a Hindu and the victim a Muslim.

Only because he is an adherent of Islam is enough for the Muslim community to show solidarity towards Sajid. It won’t matter to this community what he did or how horrible his offence was. The four members of Sajid’s family were sufficient to lend shoulders to him but hundreds of Islamists gathered to give him a hero farewell.

However, their support doesn’t stem from the perceived notion of religious fraternity and common brotherhood, colloquially referred to as the concept of Ummah instead it is driven by the hatred for dehumanised non-believers, pejoratively called ‘Kafirs’ (infidels) and shared theological believe of a common enemy. 

“Allah knows who killed the Hindu children”: Say Muslims from Badaun double murder accused Sajid’s village

While the nation is still grappling with the shock of the gruesome murder of two Hindu children in Uttar Pradesh’s Badaun district, the villagers of the slain accused Sajid have said that they are not sure if Sajid or someone else killed Ayush and Ahaan. Others said that Sajid had changed their residence twice.

OpIndia’s ground report team is on a mission to uncover the truth of the horrific murder of two Hindu children in Badaun. In pursuit of facts, OpIndia arrived in the village of Sajid, who slaughtered children in Badaun. Sakhanu village is located approximately 13 kilometres from Badaun.

When speaking with a Muslim man from Sakhanu, he expressed ambiguity questioning whether Sajid had murdered the Hindu children or someone else had done it. He stated that only Allah can determine whether Sajid killed the children or someone else did.

These locals, who visited Sajid and Javed’s barber shops for haircuts etc, stated that both of them seemed normal generally and had tied Kalava (sacred thread worn by Hindus). They added that the majority of their family members have kept names that do not explicitly reflect their religion.

Notably, on the evening of 19th March, Sajid, who ran a barbershop in Badaun, murdered two Hindu children, Ayush and Ahaan, with a knife (ustra). Sajid had fled after committing the murder. As reported earlier, Sajid was gunned down in an encounter with Uttar Pradesh police on the same day. Sajid’s brother Javed, who was there during the incident, escaped. Police teams were conducting raids in search of him. Police also announced a reward of Rs 25,000 on Javed. On the 21st of March, the police arrested him.

Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal may have been snooping on ED officials: Here’s what we know so far

In a shocking revelation, it has been reported that Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal was allegedly snooping on the Enforcement Directorate officials.

As per an IndiaToday report, during the raid on the 21st of March, the Enforcement Directorate officials recovered documents confirming the snooping allegations. Citing sources, the report says that ED might take action against the arrested Chief Minister in this regard.

The Enforcement Directorate has recovered a 150-page document containing the information about the families of the ED officials. It has been reportedly found that the illegally obtained information also included details about the work, family and even properties of the ED officials.

Furthermore, ED officials have recorded testimonies from Goa AAP candidates who claim to have been paid cash to win elections. The investigation agency also alleged that this is the same money obtained by AAP in the liquor policy fraud from South Cartel.

As reported earlier, Aam Aadmi Party supremo Arvind Kejriwal was arrested on Thursday after an Enforcement Directorate team arrived at his residence to question him and carry out searches in connection with the liquor policy scam. He was subsequently taken to the agency’s headquarters.

Kejriwal has on Friday withdrawn his Supreme Court plea against his arrest ED. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Kejriwal’s counsel, told the Supreme Court that he will argue the case before the Magistrate over his remand when the ED brings him before the Rouse Avenue court in Delhi.

Kejriwal’s arrest came after the Delhi High Court on Thursday refused interim protection from coercive action to Kejriwal and said at this stage the court is not inclined to grant interim relief. Notably, Kejriwal had over the past few months received numerous summons from the probe agency for questioning, however, Kejriwal skipped all of them. On Sunday, ED issued its ninth summon to CM Kejriwal in connection with two different cases – a liquor policy case and a case linked to the Delhi Jal Board. 

Explaining the legal strategy behind why Arvind Kejriwal, represented by AM Singhvi, withdrew his petition from the Supreme Court challenging ED arrest

Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, who had ignored nine summonses by the Enforcement Directorate before his dramatic arrest late yesterday in connection with the alleged liquor policy scam, has reportedly withdrawn his petition from the Supreme Court against his arrest.

AM Singhvi, Congress leader and lawyer representing Arvind Kejriwal, told the Supreme Court bench headed by Justice Sanjiv Khanna that the Supreme Court petition was “clashing with remand”. Singhvi said, “Otherwise there will be arguments of remand and then High Court and then..”.

Justice Khanna allowed Singhvi to withdraw the petition and approach the lower court instead.

What did AM Singhvi do when he mentioned ‘Remand hearing” in the Supreme Court

It might seem strange that after knocking on the doors of the Supreme Court, demanding a midnight hearing, Arvind Kejriwal withdrew his petition against ED arrest when he finally got the hearing that he wanted.

However, there is a well-thought legal strategy behind the move.

Firstly, it is important to understand what AM Singhvi meant when he said that the petition was “clashing with remand”.

After ED or any agency arrests an accused, it is procedural for the accused to be presented before the district court, seeking remand. After hearing the agency as to the reasons behind the arrest, the court then grants remand to the agency – the remand could be judicial remand, police remand or remand to the agency as the court deems fit.

When AM Singhvi mentioned “remand hearing”, he meant the hearing in the district court where Arvind Kejriwal would be produced by the ED seeking remand of the scam accused after his arrest late last night.

Why did Arvind Kejriwal and his legal team decide to take their chances in the District Court instead of the Supreme Court?

One may believe that all legal strategy merely comprises how the facts of the case need to be argued in a court of law, however, there is far more to it. One of the elements that all lawyers take into consideration is also how the court has responded to similar cases in the recent past.

On 22nd March itself, the Supreme Court made it clear that it was in no mood to grant relief to corrupt politicians.

Bharat Rashtra Samithi leader K Kavitha, who was arrested last week in the same case, had her petition rejected by the apex court. Interestingly, the same bench that handled Ms Kavitha’s case was assigned to consider Arvind Kejriwal’s plea.

Ms. Kavitha was advised to seek relief, including bail, from the trial court. The bench comprising Justice Sanjiv Khanna, Justice MM Sundresh, and Justice Bela Trivedi declined to entertain the petition, stating that individuals, regardless of their influence such as being a senior political figure or Chief Minister, cannot directly approach the Supreme Court without going through the lower courts.

To this end, lawyer Kapil Sibal even tacitly threatened the court saying in essence that history would not be very kind to the court when this case is recounted. To this, the bench shot down the theatrics by Sibal and asked them to approach the lower court for bail.

Incidentally, it was the same bench that was meant to hear the petition against the arrest of Arvind Kejriwal.

Arvind Kejriwal clearly realised that the Supreme Court would not be inclined to give him relief from arrest, given the precedent that had just been set by the denial of relief to K Kavitha. K Kavitha has incidentally been arrested in the same liquor scam in which Arvind Kejriwal has been arrested.

It is therefore safe to assume that the petition was withdrawn from the Supreme Court by Arvind Kejriwal because his legal team was inclined to believe that the Supreme Court would refuse to give him relief.

Further, it is also safe to assume that ED, fighting the petition by Kejriwal, would provide substantial evidence against him, accused of the liquor scam, and the legal team was simply not willing to take the risk of facts coming out in the Supreme Court so soon – denying AAP the victim card.

Kejriwal will now challenge the arrest in a district court when produced for remand by the Enforcement Directorate.

Details of the Liquor Scam in which K Kavitha and Arvind Kejriwal have been arrested

The Delhi Excise Policy 2021-2022 was first proposed in September 2020 but came into effect only in November 2021. It changed how alcohol was being sold in the National Capital. Introduced private players in the market and marked the exit of government-owned liquor vendors.

Delhi was divided into 32 zones and a total of 27 private vendors were to ply in each zone. Every municipal ward had 2-3 liquor vendors operating in the area. Proposals such as home delivery of liquor, allowing liquor vendors to offer unlimited discounts and opening of stores till 3 am were also tabled before the Delhi Cabinet.

The drastic policy change resulted in a 27% increase in government revenue to ₹8900 crores. At the same time, it marked the complete exit of the Delhi government from the liquor business. While the objective of Excise Policy 2021-2022 was to end black marketing and the liquor mafia, the Delhi government soon came under fire over allegations of corruption.

Chief Secretary of Delhi, Naresh Kumar, found irregularities and procedural lapses in the new liquor policy. Lieutenant Governor VK Saxena ordered a CBI probe on the recommendation of Naresh Kumar. Manish Sisodia waived off ₹144.36 crores on the license fee, to be paid by the private liquor vendors, under the garb of the Coronavirus pandemic.

Incurred loss to the Excise Department and benefitted liquor licensees by waiving the import pass fee of ₹50 per beer case. All these changes were made without the final approval of the Lieutenant Governor and thus considered illegal under the Delhi Excise Rules of 2010 and Transaction of Business Rules of 1993.

Thus, the Delhi government made a U-turn on its new excise policy in July 2022. A month later, CBI booked Manish Sisodia, ex-Only Much Louder (OML) CEO Vijay Nair and 13 others in an FIR for irregularities in the implementation of the Delhi Excise Policy 2021-2022. 

Sisodia was arrested in February 2023 while Kejriwal was arrested on 21st March 2024. Not until long ago, AAP supremo Arvind Kejriwal was out with all guns blazing against corruption, trying to portray himself as an anti-corruption crusader in this process.

Earlier last week, Bharat Rashtra Samiti (BRS) leader K Kavitha was arrested after the Income Tax Department and Enforcement Directorate officials raided her residence in Hyderabad. K Kavitha’s role in the scam came to light after the arrest of AAP leader and former Delhi Deputy CM Manish Sisodia. According to the Enforcement Directorate, she is a member of the ‘South Cartel,’ which allegedly received payments in the case.

Saurabh Bharadwaj vows to ‘save’ Kejriwal from arrest in Excise Policy scam while HC issues stern warning to jail him over Delhi Health Bill: Details

0

On Friday (22nd March), AAP Delhi Minister Saurabh Bharadwaj was detained by the Delhi Police after he protested against the arrest of Delhi CM and AAP supremo Arvind Kejriwal in connection with the Excise Policy scam case. This is amid the severe warning issued by the Delhi High Court that he might get arrested for disrespecting the judicial orders on the enactment of a law to govern clinical facilities.

“We will state before the Supreme Court that Arvind Kejriwal should be allowed to meet his lawyer and family and also allowed to carry out his official work. Kejriwal’s family has been put under house arrest,” Bharadwaj said on March 22, as the AAP protesters were lodged in a police bus as officials asked protesters at the ITO intersection to disperse in view of prohibitory orders under section 144 imposed in the area.

While, Delhi’s Health Minister Saurabh Bharadwaj was protesting to ‘save’ Kejriwal, the Delhi High Court issued a stern warning to him and Health Secretary S B Deepak Kumar, saying that they could face imprisonment for failing to follow judicial orders on the enactment of a law to govern clinical facilities.

The court chastised them for failing to comply with directions, emphasizing that they are “servants of the government” and cannot have “large egos.”

In February, the court summoned Bharadwaj and Kumar after reviewing an email alleging that the minister was not kept informed of negotiations on the Delhi Health Establishments (Registration and Regulation) Bill.

The Court stated that the Minister and Secretary were attempting to outdo one another, but that the Court would not accept such behaviour if its instructions continued to be ignored. “Do not do this otherwise, you both will go to jail. We will have no hesitation in sending both of you to jail if it benefits the common man,” a division bench of acting Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora said.

The Bench gave a firm warning while hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) brought by social worker Bejon Kumar Misra in which he sought the closure of all unauthorized pathology and diagnostic laboratories in the national capital run by unqualified laboratory personnel.

In February 2024, the High Court voiced concern about the government’s failure to finalize the Delhi Health Establishments (Registration and Regulation) Bill, 2022, popularly known as the Delhi Health Bill.

The Court then directed that the Health Minister and the Health Secretary attend the next hearing in person. On Thursday, March 21, Bharadwaj appeared in court and stated that the Delhi Health Bill had already been approved in May 2022. He further stated that the Court’s indulgence would help the Delhi government in getting the bill passed, even though there are vested interests who do not want the bill to become law.

The Health Secretary also appeared before the Court. ACJ Manmohan told Bharadwaj that the Court could not be used as a pawn in the conflict between the Secretary and the Minister.

“You think we are a pawn and you will use us? You are playing a game of chess and think we will help you in your strategy. I told you to be careful and to not mess around… We are handling a PIL and you are saying you will give us a draft bill and we should send it to the Centre. We are not politicians but we understand how a politician thinks,” ACJ Manmohan remarked.

“You want to send your bill to the Centre, do it. But in the interregnum, you need to put in place some arrangements. We cannot have people getting wrong reports and suffering,” he added.

The Bench then requested that the Minister and the Secretary meet to discuss how to address the petitioner’s and the Court’s concerns. The next hearing for the matter is scheduled for April 4.

Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal withdraws plea against arrest from Supreme Court

Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, who had ignored nine summonses by the Enforcement Directorate before his dramatic arrest late yesterday in connection with the alleged liquor policy scam, has reportedly withdrawn his petition from the Supreme Court against his arrest.

Reports suggest that Kejriwal will seek recourse through a lower court, following the proper protocol.

This move by the Aam Aadmi Party chief comes shortly after Bharat Rashtra Samithi leader K Kavitha, who was arrested last week in the same case, had her petition rejected by the apex court. Interestingly, the same bench that handled Kavitha’s case was assigned to consider Arvind Kejriwal’s plea.

Goddess Sita referred to as a ‘prostitute’, Hindus asked to pay ‘jizya’ to play Holi: Islamists at AMU assault Hindu students during Holi celebrations

On 21st March a major uproar ensued after Muslims attacked Hindu students and beat them during Holi celebrations at Aligarh Muslim University (AMU). A video of the instance has also surfaced on social media in which Hindu students could be witnessed running to save themselves while Islamists go on a rampage against them. According to the victims, they were celebrating Holi at AMU’s engineering campus when a large group of Muslim students arrived and started to assault them.

A First Information Report (FIR) was lodged under sections 147, 148, 149, 153-A, 386, 323 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. OpIndia has a copy of the same. People stood in support of the wounded students at the Civil Lines police station and demanded strict punishment against the culprits. The pupils have also warned the cops that they will commit self-immolation if action isn’t taken against their assailants. Furthermore, the police pacified them by assuring action against the accused.

The official complaint was lodged by Aditya Pratap Singh who is a Master of Arts (M.A.) final-year student in the varsity. It stated that the incident transpired on 24th March at about 2:30 pm when the applicant and hundreds of Hindu students including Ajay Kumar Rajput, Mohit Sharma and Puruyasarth were gathered in the Zakir Hussain College of Engineering and Technology park.

All of a sudden Miswa Kesar, Zakiur Rahman, Zaid Sherbani, Shah Rukh Sabri, Shoaib Qureshi, Ahmad Mustafa Sherbani, Affan Sherbani, Sehwan Khan, Faisal Tyagi and Arsan Siddiqui along with hundreds of other Muslim students assembled there waving pistols and sticks in their hands within a short amount of time and started abusing Hindu deities. They hurled abuses at Hindu Gods and Goddesses and announced, “Today, let us teach a lesson to the children of prostitute Sita.”

They were slandering Hindus and Hindu deities. The petitioner and his companions objected and the attackers responded by placing a revolver on their head and demanded Rs 1,000 per month in exchange for permission to play Holi. The accused then brutally assaulted the Hindu pupils despite taking Rs 750 from them and struck the complainant’s waist with the handgun’s butt. The victims narrowly escaped death and notified the authorities. They asserted that the incident had left them with serious internal injuries as well as hurt their religious sentiments. They have requested the authorities to file a case in the matter.

The police reported to have learned about a fight between two parties at AMU. The police team arrived there immediately and law and order was reinstated. Afterwards, a case was registered and legal action is underway. Nobody suffered any injuries and there is peace in the area.

Delhi CM Arvind Kejriwal withdraws plea against arrest from Supreme Court, likely to seek recourse through a lower court

Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, who had ignored nine summonses by the Enforcement Directorate before his dramatic arrest late yesterday in connection with the alleged liquor policy scam, has reportedly withdrawn his petition from the Supreme Court against his arrest.

Reports suggest that Mr Kejriwal will seek recourse through a lower court, following the proper protocol.

This move by the Aam Aadmi Party chief comes shortly after Bharat Rashtra Samithi leader K Kavitha, who was arrested last week in the same case, had her petition rejected by the apex court. Interestingly, the same bench that handled Ms Kavitha’s case was assigned to consider Arvind Kejriwal’s plea.

Ms. Kavitha was advised to seek relief, including bail, from the trial court. The bench comprising Justice Sanjiv Khanna, Justice MM Sundresh, and Justice Bela Trivedi declined to entertain the petition, stating that individuals, regardless of their influence such as being a senior political figure or Chief Minister, cannot directly approach the Supreme Court without going through the lower courts.

On the other hand, sources within Mr Kejriwal’s legal team as cited by reports have asserted that no legal impediment prevents the AAP leader – whose arrest just weeks before a general election has triggered widespread protests – from continuing as the Delhi Chief Minister. These sources pointed out that Mr Kejriwal has not been convicted, only accused.

The protests against Mr Kejriwal’s arrest have seen vocal support from nearly all opposition parties, particularly those in the INDIA bloc, of which the AAP is a part. Congress MP Rahul Gandhi is reportedly scheduled to meet with Mr Kejriwal’s family later today.

The AAP has alleged that the Chief Minister’s family is effectively under house arrest.

As Zomato launches pure veg service, Wokes and Liberals resort to vilifying Brahmins over their food choices, again

Deepinder Goyal, CEO of food aggregator Zomato, would have had no idea that his decision to launch a “Pure Veg Mode” would trigger an online attack for trying to cater to pure vegetarian customers. Despite Zomato’s explicit statement that “anyone who prefers pure veg food can avail the service and this Pure Veg Mode, or the Pure Veg Fleet does not serve or alienate any religious or political preference,” the online woke/liberal mob launched a scathing attack on Zomato and its CEO.

To no surprise, the leftists and wokes somehow linked Zomato’s move to cater to the pure vegetarian market to a move that empowered and “encouraged Brahminism and casteism”. The perennially Brahmin-despising lot equated launching a “Pure Veg fleet” to the preservation of “untouchability”. Their far-fetched insinuations also included that a pure veg service would encourage neighbourhood policing.

Recently, a fake advertisement “Eviction Safe Food Delivery” attributed to Zomato’s competitor Swiggy surfaced online. The sarcastic ad was created by a ‘Swiggy fan’ to take a jibe at Zomato for introducing the pure veg delivery fleet which would wear a green colour t-shirt instead of the trademark red. The ad featured an AI-generated image showing a food delivery man at a customer’s door with an order, while in the background, a few men appear to be following another delivery person wearing a green t-shirt with sticks in their hands.

The text in the fake ‘advertisement’ read, “Eviction-safe food delivery. In Indian neighbourhoods, your dietary preferences are best kept private. Our delivery fleet doesn’t leak your private habits to the world. You also save some money as we don’t have to pay for the life insurance of our delivery staff against mob lynchings.”

The usual players resorted to fearmongering, stoking ‘apprehensions’ that after rolling out the green-coloured pure veg fleet, Zomato’s original red-coloured t-shirt-wearing delivery partners will be assaulted and mob lynched by pure veg-preferring people. This, however, is nothing more than a figment of their imagination, as even the strictest adherents of pure vegetarianism have the basic common sense to respect the food preferences of non-vegetarians and those who may not be strict vegetarians; thus, there is no question of attacking or lynching the usual red t-shirt wearing delivery fleet simply doing their job.

It is pertinent to mention here that Zomato has often faced criticism for sending food orders that mistakenly mix up non-veg items. This is a concern with restaurants that serve both veg and non-veg food. Sometimes, vegetarian customers have even complained of finding bones and meat pieces in their food orders, bringing much condemnation to the delivery service and its standards.

Zomato had introduced the pure veg service to tackle this problem, however, the ever-metastasising “Wokeism” compelled Zomato to cave in. While the company earlier decided that its pure veg fleet would wear green colour, it backtracked and said that its delivery fleet would continue to wear Zomato’s trademark.

“All our riders — both our regular fleet, and our fleet for vegetarians, will wear the colour red,” Deepinder Goyal said adding that the fleet meant for vegetarian orders will not be identifiable on the ground although it will show on the app that veg orders will be served by the veg only fleet.

As reported earlier, Goyal said that “this will ensure that our red uniform delivery partners are not incorrectly associated with non-veg food, and blocked by any RWAs or societies during any special days… our rider’s physical safety is of paramount importance to us. We now realise that even some of our customers could get into trouble with their landlords, and that would not be nice if that happened because of us.”

Ironically, the same left-liberals and wokes who talk about freedom, choice and whatnot do not want to respect the food preferences of pure vegetarians. In fact, the very word “pure” riles them up as they believe that pure in “pure vegetarian” implies caste especially Brahmanical superiority and a marker of discrimination against others. However, contrary to their warped sense of understanding of the concept, the term pure simply signifies the strictness in adherence to vegetarianism and not superiority or discrimination.

Outrage on Pure Veg, silence on Halal: Hypocrisy and wokes/liberals go hand in hand

It’s amusing to observe the stoic silence of ever-outraged wokes and liberals on Halal food certification. This lot loves criticising Brahmins for their pure vegetarian food preferences but has no objections to Halal, which is discriminatory in the sense that only Muslims can perform the Sharia-compliant Halal slaughter of animals, implying that non-Muslims are automatically denied employment at a Halal firm. This, however, does not appear to discriminate or foster religious supremacy to the wokes and liberals, most likely because they realise the difference between the reaction of Brahmins and Muslims to their ‘outrage’

Being a “pure vegetarian” or a Brahmin can be arduous in the land of Hindus as Brahmins are under perpetual scrutiny by those despising them. The pernicious wokes leave no opportunity to vilify Brahmins in the pursuit of their ultimate goals to eradicate what they assume ‘Brahmanical superiority’, ‘patriarchy’ and whatnot as well as ostracise the Brahmins.

It is worth recalling the case of Kerala’s famous culinary expert Pazhayidom Mohanan Namboothiri who last year refused to participate in the tender for serving food at school fests in the state. Namboothiri had taken this decision after he was attacked for his Brahmin identity even though he had been serving food at school fests for over 16 years and has served over two crore students to date. Back then, many along with Congress leader VT Balram had objected to serving veg food only that too by a “Brahmin cook”. Apparently, food has no religion but it has ‘caste’.

A lot of people eat both veg and non-veg food, while many prefer not to eat non-veg on specific days, and then some people do not eat non-veg food at all for religious beliefs like Ahimsa, or Satvik or for health-related reasons. The Brahmin-hating lot is rattled over the “pure vegetarian” food preference of a section of people calling it discriminatory, encouraging untouchability and whatnot completely ignoring that these people are not forcing their preferences on others.

It is also crucial to note that pure vegetarians do not impose their dietary preferences on others. Furthermore, they are not demanding or pressuring non-vegetarians to give up their food preferences; instead, they simply want to uphold their choice without harming or affecting others in any manner.

It must here be recalled how Sudha Murthy, the former chairperson of Infosys Foundation, writer, and philanthropist was criticised last year by the same wokes/liberals for saying that carries her own bag of food and cooking items when travelling abroad because she is a pure vegetarian. She was even labelled a ‘casteist’ for being a pure vegetarian. These same wokes who accuse Brahmins of preserving and practising “untouchability” have over the years spearheaded vicious campaigns against Brahmins, ostracising them for their pure veg food and other lifestyle preferences.

Electoral bonds: Data reveals BRS received largest donation from MEIL, busts leftist ecosystem’s narrative that MEIL has ‘quid pro quo’ ties to BJP

According to the electoral bond data submitted by the State Bank of India on the orders of the Supreme Court on Thursday, March 21, Megha Engineering and Infrastructures Ltd. (MEIL) was the biggest donor for the Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) while Vedanta Ltd. was the biggest donor of electoral bonds for the Congress.

The data further revealed that the Congress party encashed Rs 1,422 crore in total, of which Vedanta Limited contributed RS 125 crore, followed by Rs 110 crore that came from Western UP Power Transmission Company limited, a subsidiary of MEIL, and Rs 91.6 crore from MKJ Enterprises.

Similarly, K Chandrasekhar Rao’s Bharat Rashtra Samithi encashed Rs 1,214 crore in total, of which Rs 195 crore came from MEIL, Rs 94 crore from Yashodha Super Speciality Hospital, and Rs 50 crore from Chennai Green Woods Private Limited.

BJP singled out for criticism over electoral bonds

Interestingly, Supreme Court advocate Prashant Bhushan, who hosted the anti-Hindu Delhi riots conspiracy meeting, had recently tried to mislead people by spreading fake news that Megha Engineering, the second-largest purchaser of electoral bonds, contributed the maximum to the BJP in return for the huge infrastructure contracts.

In an X post on 14th March 2024, Bhushan wrote, “On 11 April 23, Megha Engineering gives 100s Crs in Electoral Bonds to whom? But within a month it gets a 14,400 cr contract from BJP’s govt! Though SBI has hidden Bond numbers from the info, some of the donors’ & parties’ matches can be guessed. Most donations seem a quid pro quo.”

He stated that the BJP was illegally taking ‘bribes’ in the form of electoral bonds from the Megha Engineering Company and giving them huge infrastructural contracts in return.

Leftist ecosystem alleges Megha Engineering which made largest donation to BRS, siphoned off money to Congress and DMK, has ‘quid pro quo’ ties to BJP

OpIndia then detailed how BRS is the fourth largest beneficiary of the electoral bond scheme after the BJP, TMC, and the Congress. We also showed how Megha Krishna Reddy, who runs Megha Engineering is known to be close to the Bharat Rashtra Samiti chief K Chandrasekhar Rao (KCR), information conveniently withheld by Prashant Bhushan and coterie to suit their precise agenda.

MIEL not only donated the biggest sum to KC Rao’s BRS but also donated cash amounting to more than Rs 100 crore to the Congress party in 2019. Additionally, the company donated to DMK, Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), JD(S) and YSRCP.

Meanwhile, the electoral bond data submitted by the State Bank of India also disclosed the amounts received by other regional parties and the BJP, the largest national party.

Santiago Martin’s Future Gaming and Hotel Services contributed Rs 542 crore, or 33.7% of all donations made to the All India Trinamool Congress, which encashed Rs 1,609.50 crore through this technique. Haldia Energy Limited accounted for 17.5% of all donations received by the Trinamool Congress, or Rs 281 crore, making it the second-largest donor.

With Rs 174.5 crore from Essel Mining, Rs 100 crore from Jindal Steel and Power Limited, and Rs 70 crore from Utkal Alumina International Limited, the Biju Janata Dal has encashed a total of Rs 775 crore.

Additionally, the statistics revealed that MEIL contributed Rs 584 crore to the BJP, or 9% of its overall donations. Qwik Supply Chain Private Limited contributed Rs 375 crore, or 6% of the total funds. In the same vein, the party also received significant donations from Vedanta Limited (Rs 229 crore) and Bharti Airtel (Rs 197.4 crore).

Ever since the Supreme Court directed the Election Commission of India to publish all the details of donors and political parties that received donations via electoral bonds, the Bharatiya Janata Party became the apparent target for propagandists, opposition parties and certain sections of the media. This particular segment went at BJP hammer and tongs, calling them out for being the biggest recipients of these bonds.

Here, however, it is important to understand that BJP is the biggest national party, while the other parties that have received donations via electoral bonds are mostly state-level parties, or are national parties that are confined to one or a handful of states.

The BJP’s critics deliberately overlooked the obvious fact that, naturally, BJP gets maximum donations, considering the national ruling party is at the centre and more than a dozen other states. Interestingly, regional parties which are ruling a single state, such as the DMK and Trinamool Congress, were able to raise over a thousand crore in electoral bond donations between them. Congress got less funding than TMC for the past two years while having a bigger influence on state and national politics.

TMC’s Mahua Moitra whines about BJP getting donations through electoral bonds, ignores her party TMC getting Rs 1609 crores with just one state government

For example, All India Trinamool Congress leader Mahua Moitra became the torchbearer of this narrative being spun against the BJP ahead of the Lok Sabha elections. She claimed that “55% of the total bonds” were received by the BJP and that the Centre was using national agencies to its benefit.

However, Moitra forgot to mention that the party to which she belongs, the All India Trinamool Congress is the second largest beneficiary with Rs 1,609 crore, followed by Congress (Rs 1,422 crore) and BRS (Rs 1,215 crore). The party that is in power in just one state has managed to benefit to the extent of Rs 1,610 crores which accounts for 13% of the total amount.

In fact, after Mahua Moitra’s shenanigans over the donation received by BJP through electoral bonds several Netizens took to X to clear her air. They stated that the BJP is at present ruling several Indian states and is also at the Centre which reasonably justifies the benefit it has availed via the electoral bonds. However, they pondered how TMC, a regional party that is in power in just one state managed to benefit to this extent, surpassing the Indian National Congress (Rs 1,422 crore) and BRS (Rs 1,215 crore).

Kapil Sibal tacitly threatens judiciary after relief to K Kavita in liquor scam is denied, Judge says, ‘We will see’: Here is what happened

The Supreme Court on Friday, 22nd March, denied relief to Bharat Rashtra Samiti (BRS) leader K Kavitha in the Delhi excise policy scam case. The daughter of the former Telangana Chief Minister and BRS Chief K Chandrasekhar Rao (KCR) was arrested a week ago in the case.

A Special Bench of Justices Sanjiv Khanna, MM Sundresh and Bela Trivedi heard the writ petition filed by K Kavitha, represented by Advocate Kapil Sibal.

Sibal requested that this client not be sent back to the High Court. “Only one request, please don’t tell me to go back to High Court. See what is happening in our country. all statements are of approvers..I am very upset what is happening,” he said.

The bench responded to Sibal saying that he shouldn’t get emotional. “Don’t get emotional, we are hearing the Vijay Madanlal challenge..as fair as bail is concerned, WE ARE VERY CLEAR YOU HAVE TO GO THROUGH THE TRIAL COURT…All of us are clear that only because it is a political person, we cannot grant relief..,” the Court said.

“What you are asking us to do is not possible, what is going to happen is everyone is going to come under Article 32..you cannot make submissions on merits..we cannot hear it..we will issue notice and hear it with the main challenge..”, the bench added.

The Court directed K Kavitha to move Trial court for relief citing that the case concerns a political person and the practice is uniform in such case. Ordering the BRS leader to approach Trial court, the Apex Court ordered that the bail application, if filed, should be decided expeditiously.

To this, Kapil Sibal said that the history of the Supreme Court will be written and it will not be a golden period.

“May I say something? I hope your Lordships don’t mind. History of this Court will be written, this will not be a golden period,” Sibal declared. Justice Khanna responded saying, “Let’s see.”

The Opposition has a habit of demonising all such State institutions whenever a decision or action goes against their interests. Sibal’s tacit threat to the judiciary shows how even the highest Court of justice in India has become a target for the Opposition as the verdicts are paving the way for their accountability.

Meanwhile, the Supreme Court will hear the plea filed by Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal against his arrest by the Enforcement Directorate in the liquor policy case.