After more than 1000 rockets rained from the Gaza Strip on Central Israel on Tuesday, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declared that Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad terror groups will have to “pay a dear price” for their attacks on Israeli civilians.
Israel has vowed to increase retaliatory attack to bring a ‘total long-term quiet’ before proceeding with any truce.
However, the Prime Minister of Israel warned that “this campaign will take time” and the Israelis must follow all safety instructions issued by authorities.
While delivering statements alongside Defense Minister Benny Gantz and IDF Chief of Staff Aviv Kohavi, Netanyahu blamed the Palestinian terror groups saying “Their blood is on their own hands.”
“We stand united in the face of a vile enemy. We all mourn the dead and pray for the wounded and stand behind the IDF forces,” the prime minister said after a day that resulted in three fatalities from the airstrike including the death of an Indian nurse.
Statement by Israel’s Defense Minister
Speaking after Netanyahu, Defense Minister Gantz said that the Israel Defense Forces keeps everyone safe, Jews and Arabs alike. He also called for calm between the two communities within the country.
However, the defence minister informed that retaliation will take place and that the IDF has identified “a great many targets in the pipeline” that it can yet strike in Gaza.
He added that the terror organizations “have been severely hit and will continue to be hit due to their reckless decision to fire at Israel.”
IDF Chief responds
IDF Chief Kohavi clarified that the Israeli military is only hitting hard the Palestinian terror groups in the enclave and has conducted over 500 targeted strikes in the past day and a half.
“We are determined to strike terror groups in the most serious way possible,” Kohavi reiterated.
The military confessed to having initially believed that Hamas, a terrorist organization dedicated to the destruction of the State of Israel, was not interested in a full-blown conflict with Israel at this time. However, that assessment changed over the past two days after the Palestinian terror groups clubbed two events- unrest in Jerusalem after Al-Aqsa attack and eviction of Palestinian families from Sheik Jarrah to attack Israel.
Speaking at the same event, Israels’ Internal Security Agency Shin Bet chief Nadav Argaman announced that “now is not the time for talking” after the terrorist organizations unleashed mindless violence
Attack on Israel
The Hamas terror group, which currently rules Gaza, claimed to have launched over 130 rockets at a time in a violent onslaught on Israel. According to Israeli forces, terrorists of Palestine Islamic Jihad are also launching rockets attacking Israel.
Israel has been kept engaged in retaliatory targeted airstrikes on terror base which resulted in the killing of two top Hamas leaders.
Giving an update, Netanyahu informed that the military has so far struck hundreds of targets in the Gaza Strip and assured that the raids will continue.
The Shiv Sena on Wednesday claimed that even though Maharashtra Congress leaders do not read its mouthpiece ‘Saamana’, the interim President Sonia Gandhi has ‘taken note’ of its article, which raised questions on the Congress party’s inability to defeat the incumbent government in Kerala, Assam, and drawing a nought in West Bengal.
An editorial published on Shiv Sena mouthpiece Saamana on Wednesday said that Sonia Gandhi had raised important issues of the party’s failure in the recently concluded elections in the meeting of the Congress Working Committee. The Marathi publication said Congress seems to be affected by the defeat in Assam, West Bengal and Kerala. Raising questions on the responsibility for the lack of grass-roots leadership in the Congress, the editorial said that all three chief ministers of Assam, Puducherry and West Bengal were once a part of the Congress fold.
Sena advised Congress to self introspect and emerge as the leader of all opposition parties in future.
The editorial came against the backdrop of a humiliating poll drubbing that Congress received at the hands of the incumbent BJP in Assam and the LDF in Kerala during the recently held Assembly polls in the two states. On the other hand, West Bengal saw a pitched battle between the BJP and the TMC, with Congress struggling to maintain its relevance. As a consequence, it could not win a single seat out of the total 292 assembly seats.
Significantly, Maharashtra Congress president Nana Patole had recently said that he has stopped reading ‘Saamana’ and does not take things published in the Sena mouthpiece seriously. The Congress leader had also suggested that Shiv Sena should stop commenting on his party and its leadership.
However, the editorial published on Wednesday said that Sonia Gandhi asked the same uncomfortable questions over the Congress party’s defeat in the assembly elections which were asked through an editorial in ‘Saamana’.
“If senior Congress leaders have read the Saamana editorial and gave their feedback from the grass-root level to Sonia Gandhi, it is good,” said Shiv Sena in its article.
The article also fawned over the former Congress president Rahul Gandhi, hailing him as a lone leader putting up a brave fight against the BJP despite the barrage of criticism levelled against him. “Rahul Gandhi is the commander-in-chief of the Congress party and his attacks on the government are very specific and to the point, ” the article said.
The article further added that Congress will have to fashion itself as a strong opposition party to fight the Modi government in future. It suggested Congress leave the Twitter world and get on the ground to connect with the people and restore their lost pride.
“At this time, all the opposition leaders to shun their Twitter existence and emerge on the political battleground. Coming to the ground doesn’t mean inviting crowds during the time of the pandemic, it means to question the government and hold it accountable,” the editorial said.
“The Congress party should take the lead in forging a united front of opposition political parties. Sonia Gandhi must be wanting to give the same message. She is still the Congress president and it is important to take note of her views,” it said.
A fresh wave of violence has descended upon the Abrahamic Holy Land, with Palestinian terror unit Hamas firing multiple rockets at Jerusalem, and the Israeli Defense Forces responding back in kind. The reasons for this new wave of violence are multi-faceted, with clashes between Palestinians and the Israeli Police exacerbating the situation. However, the main flashpoint behind the violence is the Sheikh Jarrah property dispute, a dispute which can lead to the evictions of around 300 Palestinians from the East Jerusalem neighborhood. It is of note that whereas West Jerusalem is primarily inhabited by Israeli Jews, Palestinian Arabs constitute the majority in East Jerusalem.
The map of Jerusalem old city with Christian, Jewish and Muslim areas marked, image via The Economist
Jewish landlords Vs Muslim tenants
The Sheikh Jarrah dispute is primarily a property dispute which involves several properties with tenants whose leases have expired and, in a few cases, squatters with no tenancy rights at all. These tenants, who are almost exclusively Palestinian, are facing a legal challenge from their landlords, who are the owners of the property, as has been established by multiple rulings in Israeli courts. The property owner/landlords, who are primarily Jewish, have pursued this litigation throughout the years and have won at every level of the Israel judicial system thus far. On May 10, the Israeli Supreme Court was supposed to rule on an appeal from the Sheikh Jarrah tenants against their landlords. However, this ruling has been delayed for at least 30 days in wake of the violent clashes between Palestinians and the Israeli Police.
Back in the 1870s when Jerusalem was under Ottoman rule, the Jewish community purchased the land of what is now Sheikh Jarrah, in order to live close to the supposed tomb of a Jewish High Priest dating back to antiquity. The Jewish community enjoyed uninterrupted ownership of Sheikh Jarrah till 1947. However, after the 1947 Arab-Israeli War, the Kingdom of Jordan occupied East Jerusalem, including Sheikh Jarrah.
Under Jordanian rule, Sheikh Jarrah was re-populated by Palestinian refugees, although the title and ownership of properties in Sheikh Jarrah were not handed over to the Palestinians. Eventually, Israel took over East Jerusalem from Jordan in 1967, and the Jewish community began to re-assert its ownership over Sheikh Jarrah. The ownership claim of the Israeli Jewish landlords of Sheikh Jarrah is not seriously disputed, at least in Israeli courts.
The leasehold rights of the Palestinian tenants of Sheikh Jarrah were presented to them in the 1950s by the Jordanian Custodian of Enemy Property. These lease holding rights of the tenants, which are not ownership rights, have been accepted by the Israeli courts. In 1982, the Israeli courts ruled in favor of adopting a settlement agreement between the leaseholders and the owners of the properties. This agreement established that the tenants had “protected leaseholds” under Israeli law (a status superior to ordinary leaseholds under Israeli, Jordanian, and British law) but that the owners still retained title ownership of the properties.
The Palestinian tenants continue to enjoy the benefits of these “protected leaseholds” to this day, marking more than fifty years of uninterrupted possession. Now that the Sheikh Jarrah leaseholds are expiring (either due to the natural expiration of leasing rights or serious breaches or terms of the lease), there is a renewed legal and moral debate contrasting the rights of the lease-holding tenants and the title-holding owners.
There was only one major interruption in the owner’s uninterrupted chain of ownership over SheikhJ arrah, that is the 1948-67 occupation of East Jerusalem by Jordan, with Sheik Jarrah properties held by the Jordanian Custodian of Enemy Property. During this 19-year occupation, Jordan denied Jews the right to exercise their property rights, which was explicitly discriminatory in nature.
After expelling all Jewish residents of East Jerusalem during its occupation, Jordan transferred custody over all Jewish-owned property to the Jordanian Custodian of Enemy Property. According to the British law on enemy property, on which the Jordanian law is based upon, Jordan’s sequestration of the enemy property only extinguished owners’ rights completely if the state seized title by eminent domain or if the Custodian transferred title to someone else. In the case of Sheikh Jarrah properties, the Custodian did not transfer the ownership of the properties to anyone else, instead of leasing some of the properties to Palestinian Arabs. Therefore, the original ownership rights in the case of the Sheikh Jarrah properties were not extinguished.
Jordan had not granted ownership rights to Arab tenants
After the Six-Day War of 1967 ended Jordan’s occupation of East Jerusalem, Israel passed legislation that upheld the private property rights of all ethnicities, including Palestinian Arabs who received the title from the Jordanian Custodian of Enemy Property. Ironically, if only Jordan had transferred the ownership rights of properties in Sheikh Jarrah to the Palestinian Arabs, instead of leasing them out, the Israeli law would respect and protect the resulting ownership rights.
The reason why the tenants in Sheikh Jarrah today lack ownership is not that Israel denies property rights to Palestinian Arabs, but, rather, because the government of Jordan declined to give the Palestinian Arabs title to the land that Jordan had seized.
For example, in a hypothetical situation, if Pakistan takes over Kashmir and expels all Kashmiri Pandits from their homes, declaring their houses to be enemy property, and then leases out these properties to fellow Pakistanis, it would not be legally incorrect to restore those properties to their original Kashmiri Pandit owners once India retakes it. Even if India recognizes the lease-holding and tenancy rights of non-citizens who were settled into Kashmiri Pandit homes by Pakistan in this hypothetical situation, India can restore the ownership rights of Kashmiri Pandits on their properties, allowing them to seek and collect rent from the tenants now occupying the property.
There are a lot of misconceptions in the Western media and international activists in general regarding the Sheikh Jarrah property dispute. From a strictly legal perspective, and relying on the various decisions of Israeli courts on this issue over the decades, it can be securely stated that the Palestinian tenants of Sheikh Jarrah do not possess ownership rights over the properties in question. However, the battle over Sheikh Jarrah is not strictly legal, carrying with it the baggage of more than 70 years of Israeli-Palestinian conflict. All eyes are now on the Israeli Supreme Court, which will announce a new date for the ruling on Sheikh Jarrah in the next 30 days.
Israel, which has been sending lifesaving relief material to India to battle the second wave of the coronavirus pandemic, is facing security threats in the country for the last several days. In what is recorded to be a long-standing territorial-control conflict, clashes between Israel and the pro-Palestinian forces have once again escalated, resulting in large-scale violence and attacks.
Apart from violent rioting, setting synagogues on fire and open shooting, the residential areas of Israel have also been targeted with 1000+ rockets in less than 40 hours as per the Israel Defense Forces update.
While messages of support from Indians pour in for Israel- one of India’s strongest allies, some from the opposition and the left-wing have chosen a different route, along with the Islamists.
Indian ‘liberals’ support Palestine
Delhi Congress VP Ali Mehdi on Wednesday took to Twitter to express his hatred for the Jewish nation. Mehdi forebode the destruction of Israel, saying that Allah will destroy it.
“Allah will destroy Israel InshaAllah #AllahuAkbar,” Mehdi tweeted.
Source: Twitter
AIMIM leader Asaduddin Owaisi called on the Indian government to condemn India’s ally Israel claiming India has always supported the idea of an independent Palestinian state.
Source: Twitter
Sharing a video of the ongoing conflict, Owaisi said that Palestine needs no savior when they have God by their side.
Source: Twitter
INC politician and a Gandhian as per his Twitter bio, Salman Nizami too has been sloganeering to Save Palestine. Sharing a video of an air strike, Nizami Tweeted, “Their blood is on Israeli hands. We won’t forget! #SavePalestine #PalestinianLivesMatter.”
Source: Twitter
Sharjeel Usmani, a known hatemonger, has jumped on the BDS bandwagon and has asked people to boycott brands such as Puma and HP after the Al-Aqsa mosque incident. The list also asks public to ban Caterpillar bulldozer as it is used for the demolition of Palestinian homes and farms.
Source: Twitter
Not just this, Usmani has also joined a #DeathToOccupation campaign which calls for liberation from foreign occupation in Kashmir and Palestine.
Source: Twitter
Self-acclaimed employer of trolls, Bollywood actor Swara Bhasker labeled Israel as an apartheid and terrorist state in her Tweet.
Source: Twitter
Supporting her claims, so-called comedian Agrima Joshua declared the claim on land by Zionists’ “purely Biblical” and saying it has no value.
Her Tweet read, “As Indians who stand for the rights of indigenous people, this occupation. The Zionists’ claim over this land is purely Biblical and that claim has no value. Palestine can’t be made to pay for the unforgivable sins of Europe.”
Source: Twitter
The Tipu Sultan Party which claims to be registered with the Election Commission of India highlighted that Israel as a nation did not exist till a few decades ago and has been running a #BoycottIsrael campaign on Twitter.
Source: TwitterSource: Twitter
Meanwhile, the situation continues to remain grim in Israel with its densely populated cities like Tel Aviv and Lod under constant air strikes and riots.
Apparently some 1500+ people and organisations ‘endorsed’ this gimmick that ‘vaccine discrimination’ needs to stop. They claimed that the ‘vulnerable population’ in India which does not have ID proof, will be deprived of vaccination and puts them at risk. Hence, they want the vaccination to be carried out without any sort of documentation.
Now, if only Internet ‘activists’ would Google a little before throwing a hissy fit, they would actually do themselves a favour than coming across as a bunch of hysterical nuisance creators.
The Ministry of Health and Family Welfare has issued an SOP [pdf] on Chinese coronavirus vaccination for people who do not have identity proof.
The ministry acknowledges that a certain vulnerable section of the society may not have valid identity proofs but are equally at risk to catch the infection. Hence, a procedure for the same has been issued by the ministry. The procedure as per the SOP is as follows:
Such groups of people include nomads (including sadhu/saints from various religions), prison inmates, inmates in Mental Health Institutions, citizens in Old Age Homes, road side beggars, people residing in rehabilitation centres/camps and any other identified eligible persons, aged 18 years or more, and not having any of the seven prescribed individual Photo ID Cards.
District Task Force may identify such groups of persons in respective districts not having any of the prescribed individual Photo ID Cards with assistance from concerned government department/ organisation like department of minority affairs, social justice, social welfare etc.
The information regarding the identified groups and the number of beneficiaries to be covered, must be collated at the state level and the state government must issue clear instructions for implementation of these SOPs along with the district-wise estimated maximum number of doses to be administered using this special dispensation. A copy of such instructions must be displayed in public domain and should also be endorsed to the Ministry.
A Key Facilitator may also be identified for each such group. The Key Facilitator must have a valid and active mobile phone and must also have at least one of the seven mandated ID cards. These could be officials of the institutions (both public or private) which normally provide care and services to people in the identified groups, e.g. Prison officials for prison inmates, Executive Officer/Superintendent of and Old Age Home etc.
A district nodal officer may be designated by the DTF, for identification of Key Facilitators, preparation of vaccination plan, identification of CVCs where vaccination sessions are to be organised, preparation of vaccination schedule, communication of vaccination schedule to the identified groups/beneficiaries and mobilization of beneficiaries as per vaccination plan.
District Immunization Officer (DIO) will be responsible for organization of vaccination sessions at identified CVCs for providing coverage to the identified groups.
The CoWIN system will provide the facility for creation of special vaccination sessions for this purpose. The session will have following features – i. Registration of as many beneficiaries as are to be covered (subject to the limit of session capacity), without mandatory capturing of Mobile Number and Photo ID Card, through facilitated cohort registration. ii. All vaccination slots in such special sessions will be reserved for vaccination of such facilitated cohorts. iii. This facility will only be available at government CVCs. iv. Information such as name, year of birth (as provided by the beneficiary) and gender will be entered in the CoWIN system for the beneficiaries. v. The Key Facilitator shall verify the identity of the beneficiaries. vi. Digital vaccination certificates are to be provided to the beneficiaries, preferably at the Vaccination Center itself.
The District Nodal Officer will be personally responsible to ensure that the special dispensation provided through these instructions, is extended only to cover such persons who do not have any of the seven mandated Photo ID Cards.
Vaccine doses made available through the Government of India channel may be used for vaccination of beneficiaries aged 45 years or more and the vaccine doses procured by the State/UT Government may be used for those aged 18 years to 44 years.
All technical protocols as prescribed in the Guidelines of the Ministry regarding vaccination centres and AEFI management etc., must be followed.
The procedure is very clearly prescribed. If only these ‘activists’ had bothered to look it up, they would have saved themselves some time and perhaps money that would have gone into getting hashtags trending.
The government, obviously, needs to keep track of the vaccines administered. So demanding that the governments keep no record of vaccination is an absurd demand. The government needs to know details about inoculation so that they can prepare themselves for any future such health crisis.
Further, the government also needs to keep tab on the vials used and doses administered to prevent black marketing and subsequent exploitation. If there is no one to keep track of it, it is bound to happen, as we have recently seen in oxygen and crucial medicine crisis. It is shocking that this needs to be said in as many words.
But to create a storm in a tea cup over the Internet when you call yourself ‘Internet activists’ for things that are easily available on the Internet just reflects lack of common sense in these so-called activists. If only there were a vaccine to increase one’s IQ.
Health is a state subject and state governments are free to make policies they deem fit. Odisha government today announced that they will soon make vaccines available to vulnerable people without need of ID proof.
More than 200 blasts and 15 suicide attacks have rocked Afghanistan since the start of the Muslim holy month of Ramzan on April 13, the Ministry of Interior Affairs of Afghanistan said on Tuesday. Over 255 civilians have perished, and 500 others have been injured in the attacks that the Ministry has attributed to the Taliban.
On Tuesday, Afghan President Ashraf Ghani expressed his gratitude to the security forces for preventing over 800 incidents of attacks, and in the process arresting more than 800 terrorists, who he said will be tried as per the law for carrying out terror activities.
The message from the Afghan president came in the wake of the ceasefire announcement made by the Taliban on Sunday night. The Taliban announced that they would observe a three-day ceasefire for the festival of Eid. On Monday, Afghan President Ashraf Ghani directed all the security forces to observe the ceasefire during Eid.
Khan Agha Rezaee, head of the internal security committee of the parliament, said that there was a dire need for a ceasefire as this year, there has been a large number of civilian deaths in the terror attacks. “Civilian casualties were high during Ramadan and there was a need for a ceasefire. We hope the ceasefire continues so that we can move towards the talks,” he said.
According to TOLOnews, the number of civilian casualties has increased by a staggering 20 per cent during the last one month, that is, the period from April 13 to May 12, as compared to a month before.
Even on the first day of Ramadan, Afghan forces tangled with the Taliban, resulting in the death of 8 civilians and leaving 21 other injured.
A significant number of civilian deaths have been caused by car bombs, which include a car bomb attack in Logar, another one in Farsi district in Herat, a roadside bomb blast in Zabul and three other explosions near Sayed-ul-Shuhada school in Kabul.
Recently, a powerful explosion outside a school in Kabul killed 85 Afghan girls and injured scores more, many of them teenage girls leaving class. Security agencies pointed fingers at the Taliban for the attack but the Islamic extremist group has denied the responsibility. However, the analysts believe that the attack may have been carried out by one of the splinter groups or offshoots of the Taliban.
With the impending American troop withdrawal, the intensity and scale of attacks in Afghanistan have seen a sharp uptick, underscoring the precarious state of the country’s internal security that is at risk of being overrun by the Taliban once the US forces leave the country.
At a time when India has been tackling the second wave of the coronavirus pandemic with cases crossing the 4-lakh mark each day, a new symptom of the deadly disease has emerged, causing a major worry among the population.
The latest symptom associated with the Covid-19 is ‘Black Fungus’, which has manifested in several patients across the country during the second wave of the pandemic in India. The life-threatening infection – ‘Black Fungus’ known as mucormycosis, has now been detected in Delhi, Maharashtra, and Gujarat among Covid-19 patients.
At least eight Covid-19 survivors have died in Maharashtra due to ‘Black Fungus’, while 200 others have been affected by the fungal attack and are being currently treated. The symptoms have now sparked panic among the people of the country, who are already battling the Chinese pandemic. However, the black fungus reportedly does not affect everyone.
So who does it affect? Here is what you need to know:
What is Black Fungus?
Mucormycosis or Black Fungus is a serious but rare fungal infection caused by a killer fungus – Mucor, that exists in the environment, often found on wet surfaces. The Mucor fungus forms blackish moulds. People get mucormycosis by coming in contact with the fungal spores in the environment and is caused by exposure to Mucor fungus, often found in soil, plants, manure, and decaying fruits and vegetables.
The fungus causes the disease that has now been linked to the airborne Covid-19 infection. The infection was first reported during the first wave of the pandemic last year, however, it was previously known as zygomycosis.
Does it affect all population?
The outbreak of Black Fungus infection is not a cause of concern as it is not affecting general or asymptomatic patients, at least for now. It is believed that the fungal attacks are generally affecting Covid-19 recovered patients who have other comorbidities like diabetes, kidney or heart failure, cancer. In addition, patients who were administered steroids or have had a transplant are also facing symptoms. However, according to the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) of the United States, it is most common in diabetic patients.
Interestingly, before the outbreak of the Chinese pandemic Covid-19, the Black Fungus was sporadic and found only in immunocompromised people. As coronavirus attacks the immunity system, the mucor fungus affects diabetic people and patients treated with steroids. As a result, Covid-19 survivors are vulnerable to the infection, especially during the severe second wave.
However, one can get treated with early detection and clinical intervention to the affected area. Usually, MRI scans can determine the extent of damage the fungus may have caused. If it is not undiagnosed or untreated, mucormycosis may result in blindness, removal of the nose, jaw-bone, or even death.
Common symptoms of Black Fungus
Some of the common symptoms that affected are generally facing is – One-sided facial swelling and headache. Some of them are experiencing Nasal or sinus congestion. Black lesions appear on the nasal bridge or upper inside the mouth for those affected by Black Fungus. One may also experience high fever if they come in contact with Black Fungus disease.
In addition to these, patients suffering from the infection typically have symptoms of a stuffy and bleeding nose, swelling of and pain in the eye, drooping of eyelids, and blurred or loss of vision. There could be black patches of skin around the nose.
How to prevent Mucormycosis or Black Fungus?
Using masks and covering oneself with shoes, long trousers, long sleeve shirts and gloves while handling soil (gardening), moss or manure. Maintaining personal hygiene, including thorough scrub bathing, may help people to avoid the infection.
The disease can be managed by controlling diabetes, discontinuing immunomodulating drugs, reducing steroids and extensive surgical debridement- to remove all necrotic materials.
Most of us have heard the name of Charles Sobhraj, the serial killer who murdered at least between 12 to 24 people between 1963 and 1976, who is in the news recently due to the BBC-Netflix series The Serpent based on his life. However, it is significantly less known how different people played a vital role in his conviction. One of the most important persons, in this case, is a Dutch diplomat named Herman Knippenberg. Over a period of time, Knipperberg collected a lot of evidence against Sobhraj, and when the time came, his efforts and documentation helped in his conviction to a large extent. This is the story of the man, the Dutch diplomat, who sent the Serpent behind bars.
The dark day of 1976
Herman’s involvement in the case began in 1976 when he received a letter in February about two Dutch backpackers who went missing in Bangkok. During that period, as the world was not yet developed enough to share information about criminals with a blink of an eye, it was much easier for the likes of Sobhraj to change identity and roam across the globe without fear of arrest. Bangkok was no different, and it used to be a less connected city at that time. In the lack of communication devices that backpackers use nowadays, sometimes travellers would go unchecked for weeks and even months.
The case of two Dutch backpackers was Herman’s first encounter with the horrifying stories of Sobhraj. The letter that Herman received was from a man who was looking for his sister-in-law and her boyfriend, identified as Henricus Bintanja and Cornelia Hemker. According to the letter, they had been writing to the family at least twice a week while travelling Asia. However, for six weeks, they did not hear from them that raised concerns.
Cornelia Hemker (left) and Henricus Bintanja (right). Dutch couple killed by Sobhraj Source: CNN
Then 31-years-old Knippenberg was working as a junior diplomat at the Dutch embassy. He had been living in Bangkok for some time with his wife, Angela. When Herman read the letter, a story that he read about the discovery of charred bodies a few weeks back started coming back to him. The bodies were found on the roadside near Ayutthaya, which is located around 80 KMs north of Bangkok. Initially, Police thought they were missing Australian backpackers, but later they were found to be alive. Connecting the dots, Herman figured they might be the missing Dutch backpackers.
One of the main reason he took an interest in the case can be asserted from one of his interviews that he gave to Daily Mail. He said, “I’d been travelling in my 20s, and I knew that people like Henk and Cornelia would keep in touch.” He immediately got hold of a Dutch dentist based in Bangkok for help in identifying the burnt bodies. He got the dental records of the missing couple and, with the help of the dentist, matched them to the bodies at the police morgue. Herman said, “What shocked me the most was when the pathologist at the mortuary told me there was soot in their lungs, which indicated they had both been set alight when they were still alive.”
While trying to what happened to the couple, he remembered a story that his friend Paul Siemons, an administrative at the Belgian embassy, told him about a French gen dealer identified as Alain Gautier who had possession of a large number of passports in his Bangkok apartment. The connection between the Dutch couple and Gautier became stronger when the couple’s parents told Herman that they were told that the couple had met a gem dealer named Alain Gautier in Bangkok. Those passports allegedly belonged to the missing persons who were believed to be murdered. Two of the passports were Dutch. However, Siemons refused to tell Herman about his source of information.
When Herman first heard the story, he thought his friend was crazy, but now he could link that story to the Dutch couple. Later, he discovered that Alain Gautier was, in fact, one of the many aliases that Sobhraj had used throughout his life. For a long time, Herman kept investigating him by his alias that was Alain Gautier. It was later revealed that while Sobhraj, the conman and serial killer, had been befriending travellers only to drug and rob them. As the security was not that perfect those days, he would take the victims’ identity and travel across Asia like a free man.
The hunt of the Serpent
After a day of his trip to the morgue, Knippenberg decided to call Siemons and asked him to tell the source of the story about the gem dealer. After some persuading, Siemons told him that Nadine Gires, a Frenchwoman who lived in the same apartment building as Sobhraj, used to introduce clients to him.
When Gires met Herman, she revealed how other people who worked for Sobhraj fled after discovering the collection of passports belonging to the missing persons. They were afraid that he would kill them too. She told Herman that she remembered seeing the Dutch couple at his home. Without wasting any time, Knipperberg alerted the authorities. If he had followed the rules, his role would have ended with Thai authorities taking over the case, but Herman continued investigating the case independently.
When the Serpent slipped out of the fingers of the law
On March 11, Gired told Knippenberg that Sobhraj and his girlfriend Marie-Andrée Leclerc alias Monique were planning to leave for Europe. He informed the Police, and officers stormed Sobhraj’s apartment. Though he was taken for questioning, he was well prepared. According to the biography of the killer written by journalists Richard Neville and Julie Clarke, “The Life and Crimes of Charles Sobhraj”, he used one of the victim’s passport. He had replaced the photo with his own and identified himself as an American citizen. He was released from custody.
Later that night, Gires called Knipperberg and informed him that one of Sobhraj’s housemate had invited her to the apartment as he wanted to talk. There was a danger to her life, but if she did not go, he might find out Gires was the one who leaked the information about the passports. When Gired was at the apartment, she was alone for a few moments and used the time to slip some passport photos she noticed into her bra. Those photos gave more information about one of his victims. The very next morning, Sobhraj and his girlfriend left Thailand forMalaysia.
When Herman came to know his true identity
After Sobhraj escaped, Knippenberg faced the wrath of the Netherlands officials, who were frustrated at the Thai police’s inaction. He was sent to three weeks’ leave. Before he left for the holiday, he and his then-wife Angela compiled a cache of documents, now known as Knipperberg cache, and dropped them across Bangkok in different embassies. Knippenberg couldn’t let go of the case even though his superiors had told him to forget about it. He said, “The more I saw it, the more I knew I had to follow this. The ambassador told me to stop, and he even sent me on leave at one point. But I wouldn’t give up on them, even though I knew I was putting my career in danger.”
After returning from his leave, he got a call from the Canadian Ambassador, who informed him about the visit that Canadian Police paid to the parents of Sobhraj’s girlfriend. They told the Police that their daughter had been travelling with her boyfriend and had left an emergency contact. The number belonged to Sobhraj’s mother, who finally revealed the true identity of Sobhraj.
Sobhraj’s filthy lair
Within few days, Gires called Herman and informed him that Sobhraj’s landlord was planning to rent out the apartment where Sobhraj lived, and his belongings would be thrown out. Knippenberg immediately formed a team and reached to the apartment to collect any possible evidence.
Knippenberg, in his statements, mentioned that the apartment was seedy and filthy. He found 5 KG of medicine and three industrial-size cartons of liquid drug that can be used as a laxative or a “chemical straitjacket.” They also got hold of Dutchwoman Hemker’s coat and handbag in the apartment.
On May 5, 1976, on the orders of the Dutch ambassador, Herman shared the story with the press, and within days, Bangkok Post printed a front-page story titled “Web of Death”. The story became a topic of discussion in Thailand that forced the Thai authorities to notice the issue. They issued an Interpol notice which led to the arrest of Sobhraj on July 5, 1976, in India.
“The Web of Death” Source: history vs hollywood
Sobhraj – The bikini killer
Sobhraj was born in 1944 in French-administered Saigon to a Vietnamese mother and Indian father. According to biographers, he had a difficult childhood. His parents had split up few years after his birth. His father rejected him, and his mother married a French soldier, after which the family moved to France.
Those who knew Sobhraj painted him as a handsome and charming conman. He had a long list of girlfriends and sometimes shuffled between many at the same time. In 1963, he was jailed for the first time for burglary. During his time as a criminal, he had escaped from prison in several countries, which led to the name “the Serpent”.
Sobhraj never revealed why he started killing. He had admitted to at least 12 killings between 1972 to 1976. He said to have killed the alleged victims by drugging them until they overdosed, drowned some of them and in some cases stabbed them and set them on fire. He had thrown some burnt bodies by the roadside. Those bodies, when discovered, were burned beyond recognition. It is unknown how many people he had killed. He was convicted for only two killings during his life, for which he is facing life imprisonment in Kathmandu, Nepal.
The first person he killed was a Pakistani taxi driver in 1972. He had killed six victims in Thailand, including an American tourist, two French nationals, a Dutch couple and a Turkish man. The American woman he had killed was found in a swimsuit floating off Pattaya beach. The case earned him the nickname “the Bikini Killer.”
Sobhraj’s arrest in India
In Spring 1976, he fled to India after the stories of bikini murders started to make the headlines. He was on Indian authorities’ radar over the international arrest warrant. He was arrested for drugging a French tour group in Delhi in July 1976. Notably, the Indian Police also charged him for the murder of an Israeli man in Varanasi and a French tourist in Delhi. However, the charges of two murders were overturned on appeal. He was found guilty only of the robbery attempt and was sentenced to 12 years of jail in Delhi’s Tihar prison.
Sobhraj Being taken to Jail in India. Source: CNN
Sobhraj’s luxury stays at Tihar
According to Sunil Gupta, former superintendent and legal officer at Tihar, Sobhraj enjoyed his stay at Tihar. He would get food based on his preference and often get conjugal visits that other inmates could not afford. Gupta wrote a memoir titled “Black Warrant: Confessions of a Tihar jailer”, in which he said how he would roam freely while other inmates had to stay in their wards.
Sobhraj used his knowledge of the law for drafting court petitions for wealthy inmates and used the money for his lavish lifestyle by bribing the guards. It was alleged that he had secret recordings of senior prison officials that could lead to their conviction under corruption charges. It helped him keep up with the lifestyle in jail.
According to Bangkok-based journalist Alan Dawson who interviewed him in Tihar in 1984, he had a “suite of three cells”. Everyone respected him and the visitors who came to meet him. It was unclear who had instructed them to be nice to people who came to meet him, Charles or the higher officials.
Escape from Tihar
On March 17, 1986, Sobhraj escaped from Tihar. Gupta ran to the prison when he was informed about the escape. He found out that Sobhraj offered gatekeepers sweets laced with sedatives on the pretext of his birthday. Over a dozen prisoners, including Sobhraj, escaped that day.
When the news of his escape made international headlines, Knippenberg was informed by his program adviser at Harvard University, where he was studying for a master’s degree. She asked him to go underground, but Herman was adamant as he believed Serpent would not come after him. He was right, and Sobhraj was arrested on April 6 while enjoying his time in Goa on his 42nd birthday. He was sent to jail for an extended time, putting an end to the statute of limitations for his extradition to Thailand.
It is believed that it was his plan to escape from prison and get re-arrested so that his jail term is extended and he can’t be extradited to Thailand. Because his jail term was 12 years was getting over soon and within the statute of limitations, which he would be extradited to Thailand after his release, where he would be executed for the crimes he committed there. His plans worked, as his jail term was extended by 10 years, exceeding the statute of limitations for extradition to Thailand.
When he was released from Tihar in 1997, the Indian govt allowed him to go back to France as at that time there was no extradition request for him from any county. In Franch, he hired a publicity agent and charged large sums of money for interviews and photographs. He once sold book and movie rights of his story for $15 million to an unnamed French actor-producer. However, no film was released. Several books and television series did make it to the market.
The conviction
In 2003, Knipperberg received a call on his first day of retirement about the arrest of Sobhraj in Nepal. He fondly remembered, “Yes. It was a Saturday morning on the 19th of September 2003. A cool spring day in Wellington. It was the first day of my retirement, and I was looking forward to a breakfast of pancakes. That’s when the phone rang.” The serpent was being charged with the 1975 murder of a tourist in Kathmandu. It is unclear why he travelled to Nepal as it was the only country left in the world where he was still a wanted man. Sobhraj denied visiting Nepal before during questioning. This is where Knippenberg made a huge entry in the story.
Boxes of evidence that Knippenberg kept for years in his Wellington home. Photo: Victoria Birkinshaw/Noeth&South.co.nz
At first, he could not believe what he was hearing. He said, “Don’t be ridiculous, he’s busy charging gullible Americans $5000 for the dubious privilege of having lunch with a serial killer in Paris.” He dug out the six boxes filled with evidence he had collected over time. He remembered correctly that his girlfriend told during questioning after her arrest in July 1976 that they spent time in Nepal. He had the documents and forwarded them to the FBI. In a statement, Knipperberg said, “I think it goes too far to say that I was directly responsible for his conviction in Nepal. Though my efforts indicated to Nepal police what there was and where to look for it.”
Connie Jo Bronzich (left) and Laurent Carrière (right). They were murdered in Nepal by Sobhraj in 1975. He was convicted for both murders. Source: CNN
Sobhraj was charged with the 1975 murder of an American tourist Connie Jo Bronzich. His lawyer approached United Nations Human Rights Commission as his arrest allegedly breached his human rights. He was detained for over 25 days without a lawyer and then sentenced in August 2004. He was not allowed to call his own witnesses or hear evidence presented against him. In 2010, Anthony Cardon, then officer-in-charge of the office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights in Nepal, wrote that everyone should be afforded human rights no matter how notorious their alleged crimes are. However, his statement made no difference, and Sobhraj remained in jail.
In 2014, he was sentenced to 20 years for the murder of Canadian tourist Laurent Carrière. The case was reopened in 2013 as the prosecutors were afraid he would appeal for an early release on the pretext of old age.
While many cases remained unsolved, he is spending his time in jail. Sobhraj made headlines in 2008 when the 64-year-old jailed killer married the 20-year-old daughter of his lawyer Nihita Biswas. She was his translator throughout the case. In an interview with Times of India, she claimed he was innocent, and there was no evidence against him.
Nihita Biswas and Sobhraj. Source: Indiatimes
The fear that Sobhraj may be a free man soon
There is a strong possibility that the Nepalese government let Sobhraj go based on his old age. A few years ago Nepal made changes to its jail manual which calls for the release of inmates above 72 years of age. 76 years old Sobhraj is eligible for release as per this rule, but Nepal govt has not released him. He has already filed pleas with courts for his release.
Knippenberg still remembers how injustice overpowered democracy in this case. He said, “I was confronted with a situation in which innocent people were losing their lives, and nobody lifted a finger. I saw that as the complete failure of democracy.”
Knippenberg will always be a hero who got Sobhraj arrested
Knippenberg has been deemed as a hero in the BBC/Netflix drama titled The Serpent as he helped get Sobhraj arrested in two countries. It was him who kept all the documents in perfect condition with him for years. Though his investigation was not high-voltage drama full of real-life car chases or gunfights, the work he had done in collecting proofs against Sobhraj is commendable. He collected paper clippings, made notes, kept the possible evidence with him and above all remembered the details that led to the conviction of the Serpent.
The four boxes full of four boxes of material, including yellowed photographs, extensive witness statements and photocopies of embarkation cards, flight manifests and passports, were the proof that made it possible for the Nepalese government to throw the bikini killer behind bars. However, he does not see himself as the one. “I do not see any heroes here. It was a tragic misuse of the supremely gifted mind,” he said about Sobhraj.
In 2004, in an interview with Nepali Times, he said, “I couldn’t forget him, it was like having malaria, every couple of years or so something would happen that would draw me back into the case again.” For him, the case is still open as justice has not been served in many alleged murders by Sobhraj.
The family of Rani Ahilyabai Holkar, regarded as one of the greatest women rulers in Indian history, has penned a sharp reply to Maharashtra Chief Minister Uddhav Thackeray pertaining to an editorial piece in his party’s mouthpiece Saamna.
The letter by Shrimant Bhushan Singh Raje Holkar came after Shiv Sena leader Sanjay Raut placed Ahilyabai Holkar and West Bengal Chief Minister on the same pedestal after her win in the recently concluded state assembly elections in his editorial piece in Shiv Sena mouthpiece Saamana.
In a strong reply, the letter criticized Raut and said that it is shameful to compare National leaders to today’s mere politicians for petty gains. It further stated that Ahilyabai who dedicated her entire life serving the nation and her people cannot be compared to a politician who oppresses her own people for politics.
Letter by Ahilyabai Holkar’s family to CM Uddhav Thackeray
Saying that the comparison just exposes the ideological competence of the writer, the Holkar family exclaimed that one must first prove their merit and then let the public decide the worth.
Sanjay Raut’s analysis
In an editorial piece, while comparing Mamata Banerjee to Ahilyabai Holkar, Raut had raised several questions on Congress’s existence as an opposition party after their embarrassing loss in assembly elections. While comparing Banerjee to a national leader, Raut also hinted at Banerjee as an emerging opposition leader.
Raut has been struggling to find a new national opposition leader since quite sometime. Earlier, he recommended NCP supremo Sharad Pawar to lead the UPA and give the opposition a sense of direction.
About Ahilyabai Holkar
Ahilyabai Holkar also regarded as Rajmata or Maharani Ahilyabai Holkar was one of the most renowned women rulers in Indian history. Not just a skilled fighter, but Ahilyabai Holkar was also highly educated, and well-versed in several languages and dialects. Residing in Maheshwar for 30 years, Ahilyabai Holkar dedicated herself to the people, promoted industrialization and spread the word of Dharma.
Every year, May 12 is observed as the International Nurses Day to honour the work done by nurses and mark the contribution that they make to society. This year, the day holds special significance, given that thousands and lakhs of nurses are working tirelessly across the globe in the battle against the COVID-19 outbreak.
On this year’s International Nurses Day, it is worth revisiting the dramatic escape of a group of 46 nurses from the ISIS stronghold of Tikrit about seven years ago. In June 2014, depressing news trickled in from the strife-torn Iraq, where the Islamic State was making rapid territorial gains. The ISIS terrorists had managed to intrude into Tikrit as the Civil War between them and the Iraqi Army escalated.
On the midnight of 12 June 2014, all the nurses, both Indian and Iraqis, heard a crackle of bullets on a road nearby the hospital. For the Indian nurses, this was their first brush with Iraq’s changing reality as they heard a volley of bullets being fired, along with a loud thud of noise coming from grenade explosions. Soon, the Iraqi nurses whispered among themselves to flee the town. The Indians, on the other hand, knew they had nowhere to go. 46 Indian nurses were stranded in the hospital. All except one of the 46 nurses were from Kerala.
The next day, ISIS terrorists had occupied the ground floor of the hospital. The Indian nurses lived on the second floor of the hospital in the makeshift dormitories. All the hospital staff, including the patients, were hoarded up on the second floor as the incessant firing continued on the ground floor.
One of the nurses who were present at the hospital later recalled how the masked ISIS terrorists wielding guns came up on the second floor every once in a while, asking them to check on the patients downstairs. Terrified, they would accompany them and follow their orders. Amidst the gloom of being in captivity of ISIS, their only reprieve was their mobile phones, and they had the Indian embassy’s number on it.
On June 13, they called up Ajay Kumar, the Indian ambassador in Baghdad, and asked him to help them move out of the hospital. On the same day, they called the then Kerala CM Oommen Chandy, who reportedly offered them support and asked them to not worry. He reportedly told the nurses that the roads in Tikrit had been closed, and it was not advisable for them to travel in such circumstances.
For days on end, the nurses lived in perpetual fear of being assaulted and executed at the hands of their ISIS captors, who were also known for committing unspeakable atrocities against women and holding them as sex slaves. They spent their time in captivity watching TV bulletins and surfing news on their phones, until the television stopped working and the internet was no longer available on the phones.
Subsequently, the wards of the hospital began to empty out. In about 10 days, everyone had cleared out of the hospital, except the Indian nurses. Hopes of evacuation started diminishing as the nurses were informed that the ISIS fighters were advancing and would anytime soon capture the city and the entire hospital.
On the morning of June 30, the terrorists commanded them to vacate the hospital by 6:45 pm. Overwhelmed with fear and anxiety, the nurses called up Chandy and Kumar and told them about the ultimatum given by the ISIS terrorists. They both asked the nurses to follow the directives of the terrorists, for disobeying them would be dangerous and could invite their wrath. However, the terrorists did not turn up that evening.
With terrorists not coming to fetch them, the nurses stayed in the hospital for the next few days. On July 3, a group of ISIS fighters emerged and asked the nurses to vacate the hospital in 15 minutes. They were being shifted to Mosul. A bus was standing outside the hospital to transport the nurses. Terrified by the fate awaiting them, the nurses rang up the Indian Embassy and informed them about the development. They were advised to plead with the terrorists to let them off but to go with them if they did not relent.
As the nurses lugged themselves onto the bus, the terrorists assured them that they were not going to harm the nurses, and escort them to safety. They told them that they were being taken to Mosul and then to the Erbil airport from where they could fly back to their country. They were taken to an air-conditioned room where they were asked to sleep.
Throughout their ordeal, the Indian Embassy in Baghdad steadfastly kept in touch with them on phone and at times recharging their prepaid cell phones. The next day, that is, on July 4, the terrorists returned and asked the nurses to get ready to leave for the airport. The ISIS terrorists had arranged new buses to ferry the nurses and escort them to the border, where they had an office.
After reaching the border, the nurses patiently waited for the rescue team but could not get in touch with them. There was no phone network at the place. The rescue team was 5 km away but they were not allowed to enter the ISIS-controlled area.
The office staff then arranged another bus to ferry the nurses to the rescue team. They were then taken to the military office, and then Erbil airport after their documents were verified. The Indian Government had arranged a special flight from Delhi to Erbil to fly the nurses back. After 23 days of traumatic experience, the nurses, unscathed and unharmed, finally boarded the flight on July 5 and returned home.
The escape, which was dramatic and unprecedented, given that ISIS had become notorious for meting out brutalities on their hostages, is partly credited to the then External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj, who was continuously in touch with all the major countries, including Saudi Arabia and Iraq. It is believed that New Delhi activated informal channels and established peripheral contacts with ISIS, and other splinter groups in Iraq to precipitate the rescue. The foreign ministry later refused to identify interlocutors who had negotiated the release of the nurses.
It is also said that important businessmen residing in the Gulf countries played a pivotal role in helping the release of nurses. According to the sources, at least a couple of prominent Malayalee businessmen were active along with various contacts in the Gulf region, to secure the release of the nurses.
The horrifying ordeal of Indian nurses stranded in a hospital in Iraq amidst the spectre of ISIS occupation was adapted in a Bollywood movie Tiger Zinda Hai that had Salman Khan and Katrina Kaif in lead roles.