The Wire comes up with flawed logic to rubbish new methodology which slashed growth rates of Congress regime

MK Venu's argument of sluggish bank credit due to rise in NPAs further validates how excessive credit under the UPA era led to a boost in the investment figures which did not reflect the economic realities of that period.

There’s a lot of talk around the recently released back calculations as it puts into perspective the growth that India experienced from 2005 onwards. It is interesting to note that the new methodology was appreciated by the Former Finance Minister P. Chidambaram when the 2013-14 estimates were revised from 4.7% to 6.9% according to this methodology.

Thus, when the methodology revised estimates of GDP, the Opposition along with the likes of eminent commentators decided to use this revision as a manifestation of the “strong growth” that India experienced under the UPA-II era. However, when the same methodology was extended to the data from 2005 onwards, all those who hailed the “strong growth” have started to question the same methodology. As hilarious or hypocritical as it may appear, I found the reasons given by the article by the leftist propaganda website, The Wire more amusing as it clearly showed their lack of understanding of data, statistic and above all, of economics.

- Advertisement - - Article resumes -

There is no doubt that the new methodology is a significantly better one as it takes into account the global best practices. Despite that, the article by The Wire talking about the credibility of the numbers tries to unfairly politicize what is a routine exercise by the government.

MK Venu’s argument is that investment as a percentage of GDP was higher under UPA than under NDA so how can growth be greater under NDA than UPA. The article gets the rationale behind the investment to GDP ratio wrong as it assumes that investments today have a direct impact on growth in the same period. Investments have a lagged effect on growth. Money invested today in a plant would take a couple of years to yield dividends for further growth in future.

Another issue is that a firm would invest only when it needs to add more production capacity to meet further demand in the economy. As a result, investments would be realized once there’s an increase in Capacity Utilization.

Most economists agree that the Indian Economy has had spare capacity since 2011 onwards due to the economic slowdown and this spare capacity came due to “over-investment” from 2007 onwards till 2011 which was fuelled by availability of excess liquidity due to the aggressive lending policy followed by banks: and this is what has led to the rise in NPAs and the current “twin-balance sheet” problem that our banks face.

It is amusing to see basic economic logic being completely disregarded by M K Venu in his article for The Wire as he focuses on a flawed logic to suit a convenient narrative, a narrative that stems more from political considerations rather than economic rationale.

The investment as a percentage of GDP graph shows the same story which explains why there was a build-up of excess capacity in the economy which further led to a collapse of the investment cycle post-2011. It is only in 2014 that the capacity started to pick up and once capacity utilization improved, we can witness investments to increase from 2016 onwards.

Thus, the explanation of a high ratio of investment during 2007-11 compared to 2014-18 is not a legitimate explanation for two reasons: investments have a lagged impact on growth and that investment under the UPA was fuelled by excessive credit rather than strong economic fundamentals. This is validated when one looks at the excess capacity build-up that occurred in the economy during the UPA era.

Further, his argument in The Wire of sluggish bank credit due to rise in NPAs further validates how excessive credit under the UPA era led to a boost in the investment figures which did not reflect the economic realities of that period. As a result, the investment far exceeded the growth in demand and this led to unutilized capacities which further led to a reduction in subsequent investments. The problem got amplified when economic growth collapsed post-2011 and the twin balance sheet problem started to originate.

Thus, what this new data tells us has been only strengthened by M K Venu’s article; excessive credit-fuelled investments led to overheating of the economy and this was not sustainable. There is no redemption from the gross mismanagement of the economy by the UPA and no matter how many op-eds TheWire publishes, it is well established that the growth under UPA was volatile, did not create ample jobs, it came with a very high inflation and it collapsed significantly post 2011. All of these facts have been further established by the latest release of the data so it is about time that we end the politicization of this data and find solutions to enter into the “high-growth” path.


Share This Post and Support:
We need your support to survive in the media industry. Please consider paying us for the content we produce:

To know more about these payments, please click here.


Most read articles recently

NDTV suspends Deputy News Editor for celebrating Pulwama terror attack, may take further action

NDTV Deputy News Editor Nidhi Sethi suspended by the channel for her Facebook comment celebrating the Pulwama attack

Congress supporting abusive troll claims Pulwama was an inside job by India

Sanjukta Basu is a very vocal Modi-hater and a bigot masquerading as a liberal feminist.

“By the time this video reaches you, I will be in heaven”, declared JeM terrorist in video before Pulwama suicide attack

The terrorist is seen urging the people of North, Central, South Kashmir and Jammu to come together in the fight against India.
Image Source: twitter

Vajpayee govt was forced to release Masood Azhar because of hysterical media coverage, former AAP leader Ashutosh says

The veteran journalist who is currently running his own news portal in Hindi revealed that media coverage of the hijack incident created undue pressure on the central government and they had to accept the demands of the hijackers, which included the release of three terrorists.

No, Times of India, Islamist terrorists harboured and nurtured by Pakistan, not ‘local youth’ killed over 40 soldiers

Times of India not only came out with a horrible headline, but there were also other issues with the reportage as well

What to do with these termites? Does ‘ha-ha’ reaction to terror attacks have a religion?

For some people, just the Islamic names in these 'Allah hu Akbar' brand suicide bombers is enough to empathise with the terrorists

Soft approach has failed in Kashmir, now a decisive military action is need of the hour

India needs a strong political will backed by decisive military action in Kashmir.

If ‘terror has no religion’ was not bullsh*t enough, Congress leader Sidhu comes up with ‘terror has no nationality’

Navjot Singh Sidhu said that terrorism has no country, giving a clean chit to Pakistan despite Jaish-e-Mohammed, a terrorist group backed by the Pakistani establishment has taken the responsibility for the attack on CRPF soldiers at Pulwama.

“He is not letting people wear helmets,” Puducherry Lt Governor’s exasperation at CM protesting against road safety rules

CM Narayanswamy has been protesting against Lt Governor Kiran Bedi for her tough stance on the use of helmets.

Pulwama terror attack is a violent expression of Hinduphobia

Like crimes that are related to race, gender or caste, Hinduphobic hate crime does not take place in a vacuum.

Latest articles

Connect with us

136,221FansLike
109,307FollowersFollow
22,831SubscribersSubscribe

Don't miss these