Sunday, May 16, 2021
Home News Reports Jammu and Kashmir: Former HC Judge who gave "Article 370 is permanent" verdict is...

Jammu and Kashmir: Former HC Judge who gave “Article 370 is permanent” verdict is National Conference’s Lok Sabha candidate from Anantnag

A bench headed by Massodi along with Justice Janak Raj Kotwal had observed that Article 370, which is included in Part XXI in the constitution titled "Temporary, Transitional and Special Provisions" has assumed a place of permanence in the Constitution.

Justice Hasnain Massodi, a former Judge of Jammu and Kashmir High Court, who had delivered a judgment stating that Article 370 is a permanent feature in the Constitution, is now all set to contest in upcoming Lok Sabha elections, reports Live Law.

Reportedly, National Conference led by Omar Abdullah has decided to field the retired judge Justice Hasnain Massodi from Anantnag Lok Sabha Constituency. Massodi, just months before his retirement, had delivered a controversial judgment regarding the status of Article 370 of the Constitution of India.

A bench headed by Massodi along with Justice Janak Raj Kotwal had observed that Article 370, which is included Part XXI in the constitution titled “Temporary, Transitional and Special Provisions” has assumed a place of permanence in the Constitution. The bench had held that the Article 370 is beyond amendment, repeal or abrogation, as Constituent Assembly of the State before its dissolution did not recommend its amendment or repeal.

Article 370, a ‘temporary’ provision distinguishes the state of Jammu and Kashmir from other states of the country by providing special autonomy in the functioning of the state. Most of the constitutional provisions which are applicable for other states are not applicable to Jammu and Kashmir.

While hearing a petition in Ashok Kumar vs. the State of J&K case pertaining to the applicability of reservation in the state of Jammu and Kashmir under Article 16 of the constitution, the bench had held that Clause (4A) of Article 16 of the Constitution is not applicable to the State and the constitutionality of Section 6 of Reservation Act and Rules 9, 10 and 34 of Reservation Rules is to be tested on the touchstone of unamended Article 16. It finally held these provisions are ultra-vires Article 16 Constitution of India.

Justice Massodi had observed that “The State of Jammu and Kashmir while acceding to Dominion of India, retained limited sovereignty and did not merge with Dominion of India, like the other Princely States that signed Instrument of Accession with Dominion of India. The State continues to enjoy special status to the extent of limited sovereignty retained by the State.”

“The limited sovereignty or special status stands guaranteed under Article 370 of the Constitution. The only other Constitutional provision made applicable by Article 370 of the Constitution to the State is Article 1. No other provision of the Constitution as provided under Article 370 (1), would be applicable to the State except, by Presidential order in consultation with the State in case the provision is akin to subjects delineated in Instrument of Accession and with concurrence of the State, in case it does not fall within ambit of Instrument of Accession,” the bench had observed.

However, Article 35A and Article 370 are two controversial provisions present in the constitution, providing certain benefits to the people residing in the state. The two provisions- Art 35A and 370 are very much against the idea of equality that has been promised under the Article 14 of the constitution as these two controversial provisions bars people outside the state to exert their rights in the state of Jammu and Kashmir. Since fundamental Rights enjoys precedence over ordinary rights under the Indian Constitution, both Article 35A and 370 are subservient to Article 14, thus making both provisions null and void.

Article 35A is a provision inserted into the Indian Constitution in 1954 by the then Prime Minister Nehru, which provides the Jammu and Kashmir legislature to decide who all are ‘permanent residents’ of the State and confer on them special rights and privileges in public sector jobs, acquisition of property in the State, scholarships and other public aid and welfare.

  Support Us  

Whether NDTV or 'The Wire', they never have to worry about funds. In name of saving democracy, they get money from various sources. We need your support to fight them. Please contribute whatever you can afford

OpIndia Staffhttps://www.opindia.com
Staff reporter at OpIndia

Related Articles

Trending now

Rebel YRS Congress MP who was arrested for criticising Andhra CM Jagan Reddy tortured in custody, images of injuries go viral

Guntur Magistrate ordered medical examination of rebel YRS Congress MP Raghu Rama Krishnam Raju to ascertain his custodial torture

Gujarat: Here’s why the death certificate stats from March to May so far do not prove allegations of massive undercounting of Covid deaths

There are significant concerns that the death tally in Gujarat is vastly greater than what is being admitted by the Government. A recent media...

Israel demolishes Al Jalaa building that housed Al Jazeera and other international media offices short time after warning

Israel had issued a warning that it will demolish the Al Jalaa building that houses Al Jazeera office, after which it was demolished.

The Hindu quietly changes headline after columnist calls Tejasvi Surya a virus: Here are her previous problematic comments

The Hindu published an opinion-editorial by columnist Vaishna Roy on Friday where it called BJP MP Tejasvi Surya a virus.

Punjab: After Modi Govt implements direct benefit transfer, agencies procure record wheat quantity, 9 lac farmers receive Rs 23,000 cr

A farmer named Gurdip Singh from Chak Kalan village said, "I am very happy with this system with money coming directly. I sold my entire crop to government agencies as the MSP was also better this time."

5 years ago, The Week published an article insulting, mocking, lying about Veer Savarkar, today they apologise: Read full details

After a lawsuit filed by Veer Sarvarkar's grand nephew, The Week apologises for a article on Sarvarkar published in 2016

Recently Popular

Legendary Australian cricketer slams world media for ‘vulture’ journalism, says Incredible India deserves respect: Here is what he said

In a recent post, the former cricketer has expressed his overwhelming support for India and slammed international media for vulture journalism

How NDTV played with words to give impression that Kerala woman died due to Israel, deleted and reposted, but still did not mention Palestine

NDTV subtly peddled an agenda trying to paint Israel as the aggressors and Palestine as the victim after a Indian woman died in terror attacks

Former pornstar Mia Khalifa falls for ‘toolkit’ again? Posts unedited tweet against Israel, later defends herself with bizarre explanation

Former porn-star Mia Khalifa accidentally revealed being part of an anti-Israel Twitter storm after she tweeted an unedited post

Charlie Hebdo cartoon mocking Hindu deities for Covid-19 crisis turns out to be fake? Here’s what we know

Some social media users pointed out the hypocrisy of these 'left-liberals', who were just a few months back attacking the same French magazine for publishing cartoons that were allegedly hurtful for Muslims.

Jerusalem conflict: The history of Al-Aqsa Mosque on Temple Mount and the holiest Jewish temple that preceded it

The Al-Aqsa Mosque and the Dome of the Rock was built on the same spot where the Second Temple of the Judaism was located

Israel demolishes Al Jalaa building that housed Al Jazeera and other international media offices short time after warning

Israel had issued a warning that it will demolish the Al Jalaa building that houses Al Jazeera office, after which it was demolished.
- Advertisement -

 

Connect with us

255,056FansLike
544,391FollowersFollow
24,300SubscribersSubscribe