Home Blog Page 242

India becomes world’s 8th largest tourism economy surpassing Japan and France: Read how Modi government’s efforts turned around the sector

श्रवण शुक्ल
-
0
India becomes world’s 8th largest tourism economy surpassing Japan and France: Read how Modi government’s efforts turned around the sector

India has etched its name on the global tourism map by setting a new benchmark in the world of international travel and hospitality. According to the World Travel and Tourism Council (WTTC) report, India became the eighth-largest tourism economy in the world in 2024–25. Its earnings from the tourism sector have surged to an impressive USD 231.6 billion, which is nearly ₹19.4 lakh crore.

This is a significant jump for India, which held the 10th position last year. The country has now surpassed Japan and France, moving two steps ahead in the global ranking. The United States remains the world leader in tourism earnings with USD 2.36 trillion, followed by China, Germany, Japan, the United Kingdom, France, and Mexico.

For India, securing a position in this list is not a trivial achievement. Under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, it is a testament to the visionary policies, consistent efforts, and strategic planning of the Indian government.

A decade ago, India’s tourism economy was not this strong. According to WTTC’s 2013 report, India’s tourism growth rate was around 6–7 percent, but the country’s global ranking lingered around the 24th position or even lower. That year, the number of foreign tourists visiting India stood at approximately 6.97 million. By 2019, this number increased to 10.93 million, yet the overall contribution of tourism to India’s GDP remained limited to around 5–6 percent.

It was also important to note that the tourism sector at that time was grappling with several challenges. The country had only 74 operational airports in 2014, road infrastructure was in poor condition, there was a shortage of quality hotels, and the visa process was slow. These issues posed a significant obstacle for international tourists and domestic travellers alike. Matters worsened in 2020 during the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, which brought the global tourism industry to a halt. India was no exception. The number of international visitors to the country plummeted to 2.74 million, and tourism’s share in GDP dropped to 4 percent. Hotels, travel agencies, tour guides, and local businesses suffered huge losses. The situation flipped to grim, and the future looked uncertain.

However, what followed in the post-pandemic years was a story of resilience, reform, and remarkable recovery. By 2023, India had recovered 87 percent of its pre-pandemic foreign tourist traffic. It welcomed around 9.52 million international visitors. At the same time, domestic tourism witnessed a dramatic rise, with over 2.5 billion domestic trips made across the country in 2023 alone. This swift recovery which can be seen in the result of policy reforms, focused planning, and substantial investment by the Indian government.

The transformation in India’s tourism sector did not took place overnight. It was due to the result of a series of strategic initiatives taken over the past decade. Since 2014, tourism has been made a priority sector. The budget allocation for tourism rose from ₹500 crore in 2014 to more than ₹2,400 crore in recent years. The iconic ‘Incredible India’ campaign, originally launched by the Atal Bihari Vajpayee-led government in 2002, strengthened and made more dynamics in the tourism sector. Promotion through social media, cinema, and digital content played a key role in capturing global attention. Travel-related content showcasing India’s culture and diversity contributed to building a powerful image of the country in the international tourism market.

Government initiatives like the Swadesh Darshan scheme, launched in 2014–15, also played a crucial role. Under this scheme, thematic tourism circuits were developed, such as the Buddhist Circuit, Ramayana Circuit, and Wildlife Circuit. However, in the beginning, the scheme was spread no popular across various states, which dissolved its overall impact. Recognizing this, the government launched Swadesh Darshan 2.0 in 2022, which adopted a focused, site-specific approach. This new phase of the scheme emphasized sustainable tourism, aiming to boost the local economy while preserving the environment. In its pilot phase, seven destinations, including Orchha (Madhya Pradesh), Gandikota (Andhra Pradesh), and Bodh Gaya (Bihar), were selected for development.

Another significant initiative was the PRASAD scheme (Pilgrimage Rejuvenation and Spiritual Augmentation Drive), which aimed at the enhancement of religious and spiritual sites across India. Projects such as the Kashi Vishwanath Corridor, the redevelopment of Kedarnath, and the development of Ayodhya have given a new dimension to religious tourism in the country. 73 PRASAD projects have been followed, as of 2024 with an investment of ₹1,400 crore. These projects not only improved infrastructure at sacred sites but also created thousands of jobs and boosted the local economy.

Infrastructure development has been another cornerstone of India’s tourism revival. From 2014 to 2025, the total length of national highways increased from 91,000 km to 1.46 lakh km. The railway electrification rate touched 98 percent, while the capacity of Indian ports doubled. The UDAN (Ude Desh ka Aam Nagrik) scheme led to the opening of 88 new airports, improving air connectivity to small towns and remote regions. The introduction of Vande Bharat trains further enabled faster, more comfortable travel. Investment in hotels increased as well, with 40 projects worth ₹3,295 crore approved in 2024 across 23 states, aimed at establishing world-class tourism centres.

One of the revolutionary reforms has been the simplification of India’s visa policy. E-visas are now available to citizens of 167 countries, and the streamlined online process has led to a surge in foreign tourist arrivals. India also positioned itself as a global hub for medical tourism, leveraging its affordable and quality healthcare services, including Ayurveda, Yoga, and modern medicine. In 2024 alone, foreign visitors spent ₹3.10 lakh crore, exceeding the pre-pandemic figures of 2019.

Efforts towards beautification and cleanliness were also intensified. The Swachh Bharat Abhiyan significantly improved the cleanliness of tourist hotspots, including areas around the Taj Mahal and Ganga ghats. India now boasts 43 UNESCO World Heritage Sites, placing it in the 6th position globally. The country is also focusing on natural, cultural, and adventure tourism, offering everything from the Himalayan mountains and Goan beaches to wildlife safaris and river rafting experiences.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has played a key role in promoting Indian tourism on a personal level. His visit to Lakshadweep in 2024, accompanied by social media posts and videos, created a buzz online. In his posts, he stated, “Look at the beauty of Lakshadweep, it’s no less than the Maldives.” This led to a doubling of tourist arrivals in Lakshadweep, from less than 1 lakh in 2023 to over 2 lakh in 2024. Flight operations increased by 88 percent, and his posts on platform ‘X’ (formerly Twitter) reached millions.

Modi also inaugurated the Kashi Vishwanath Corridor, which played a significant role in increasing tourism in Varanasi. Visitor numbers rose from 5 crore in 2014 to 7.2 crore in 2022, with the corridor itself receiving 10 crore visitors. Daily footfall ranged from 1.5 to 2 lakh devotees. Hotel bookings doubled in the region, and the local economy also flourished.

In Gujarat, Modi promoted the Statue of Unity, highlighting it as the world’s tallest statue, which now draws around 5 million visitors annually, strengthening the local economy. After the abrogation of Article 370, he encouraged people to visit Kashmir, calling it a "paradise." His words and government initiatives led to an increase in movie shoots and tourist visits, with over 2 crore tourists visiting Kashmir in 2024. Similarly, the Northeast regions, including Loktak Lake in Manipur, witnessed a 30 percent rise in tourism.

India’s tourism promotion was also a key part of the country’s international diplomacy. During G20 summits, cities like Delhi and Varanasi were showcased. The International Yoga Day became a global movement, further driving health and wellness tourism. Modi’s international trips to countries like Croatia, Cyprus, and Kuwait were strategically used to highlight India's tourism offerings.

Medical and cultural significance in tourism

India’s affordable and high-quality medical and cultural tourism has become a magnet for international travellers. In 2024, millions of foreign patients visited India for treatments. Alongside the growing number of UNESCO World Heritage sites, the appeal of India’s natural beauty (like the Himalayas and Goan beaches), its cultural richness (Taj Mahal, Ajanta–Ellora), and adventure options (trekking, rafting) made India a compelling destination.

Due to these developments, domestic tourism spending increased by 95 percent, and tourism’s overall contribution to GDP reached 6.6 percent, amounting to ₹21 lakh crore. International tourists spent ₹3.1 trillion (USD 36.8 billion) in 2024, a 9 percent increase from 2019, while domestic spending stood at ₹15.5 lakh crore, 22 percent more than 2019. The WTTC projects that by 2025, India’s tourism economy will reach ₹3.2 lakh crore.

This success is no accident. Since 2014, India has witnessed policy transformation, promotion of private investment, and adoption of public-private partnership models. Rapid vaccination during COVID-19 helped speed up recovery. WTTC predicts that by 2034, India will become the fourth-largest tourism economy, contributing ₹42 lakh crore to the economy and creating 64 million jobs.

Challenges faced by the Indian tourism

Yet, challenges remain. WTTC CEO Julia Simpson noted that “India has everything, but it needs better global promotion.” Moreover, overtourism in destinations like Goa has raised concerns regarding sustainability and environmental impact.

Looking ahead, the Indian government has set a goal of building a USD 3 trillion tourism economy by 2047. The focus is on digital tourism, including mobile apps and virtual tours, and rural tourism, which could provide employment opportunities in villages. The 2025 Union Budget allocated ₹20,000 crore for tourism development, with ongoing projects worth ₹3,300 crore across 23 states, including new roads, airports, and digital integration.

India’s entry into the top 10 global tourism economies is a proud moment for every Indian. It is a result of Prime Minister Modi’s foresight, government policy reforms, and the hard work of citizens. Tourism is not merely an economic driver, it is a powerful medium for taking India’s culture, history, and diversity to the global stage.

From the ghats of Kashi to the beaches of Lakshadweep, India is beautiful in every corner. If promoted wisely, with a focus on sustainability and infrastructure, India could soon find itself among the top five global tourism economies. This is a moment of national pride. The message is clear for the world,“Come, visit incredible India!”

US President Donald Trump sues Wall Street Journal, demands $10 billion in damages: All you need to know about the Epstein files controversy

OpIndia Staff
-
0
US President Donald Trump sues Wall Street Journal, demands $10 billion in damages: All you need to know about the Epstein files controversy

US President Donald Trump has sued media magnate Rupert Murdoch and The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) for defamation. The development comes after the newspaper published an articlefor their latest article implicating him in the life of convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, saying it is false and politically damaging.

The suit was filed in a Miami federal court on Friday (18th July) a day after Trump openly threatened litigation. The WSJ released a bombshell report on Thursday (17th July), which said that Trump wrote a birthday letter to Epstein in 2003 with a hand-drawn portrait of a naked woman and alluded to a “secret” that the two men shared. The article suggested a common interest between Trump and Epstein, the deceased financier who had been accused of using underage girls for sex.

Outraged by the article, Trump attacked the newspaper on his social media platform Truth Social, labeling the report a “scam” and the letter “fake.” Trump accused WSJ’s editor Emma Tucker of purposefully releasing false content and threatened to “sue the ass off” Murdoch and the publication. The lawsuit claims at least $10 billion in damages, claiming reputational damage and political consequences.

I never wrote a picture in my life. I don’t draw pictures of women,” Trump said in his internet posting, denying he wrote the letter. But some media immediately added that Trump had previously drawn sketches for fund-raising events.

Epstein files: A political headache for Trump administration

This suit is merely one aspect of the larger Epstein scandal that still shadows Trump’s second term in the White House. The Epstein files, sealed investigative reports on Jeffrey Epstein’s purported wrongdoings have been of public interest for many years, particularly among Trump’s “Make America Great Again” base who have called for full disclosure.

When Trump came back to the White House in January 2025, he and Attorney General Pam Bondi vowed transparency and indicated that they would release all of Epstein’s materials, including what many thought was a “client list” of influential individuals who were part of Epstein’s trafficking ring.

But that vow seems to have disintegrated. Earlier in the month, the Justice Department made public a memo saying there was no such list of clients and no proof of blackmail of well-known people. The memo was unsigned and merely declared that the case was closed, an action that incensed many conservatives expecting some form of accountability.

Tucker Carlson, a former stalwart Trump supporter, expressed disillusionment at a student summit on 11th July, stating, “The government I voted for told me to shut up and stop asking questions.” Conservative activist Charlie Kirk reiterated the disillusionment, sharing that when he asked a group of 7,000 people if the Epstein case was still relevant, all hands went up.

The pushback was so harsh that Trump had no choice but to react. On 12th July, he instructed his supporters not to “waste time and energy” on the Epstein documents, which led some pundits, such as Dinesh D’Souza, to shift their tone and tell their supporters to move on. But the flip only created more speculations: Was Trump attempting to cover something up? Was his name on the very list he had previously vowed to publish?

Asked by journalists whether Attorney General Bondi had read his name in the Epstein documents, Trump simply replied “no” and blamed the controversy on a conspiracy by former officials like James Comey and Barack Obama, a claim with no clear basis.

What are the Epstein files?

“Epstein files” consist of investigative files, records, videos, and contacts collated by federal agencies while investigating Epstein’s criminal enterprise. They are said to contain flight logs from Epstein’s private aircraft, contact lists, accounting records, and even video evidence of abuse.

Attorney General Pam Bondi released the initial batch of redacted documents in February 2025, including flight records and contact lists. She asserted that more would be released after review to shield victims’ identities. Bondi even stated that one time a client list was “sitting on my desk” to be reviewed.

But by July, the memo of the Justice Department made a stark U-turn. It asserted there was no incriminating client list and no reliable proof of blackmail, an explicit contradiction of what had been intimated before by Bondi and Trump himself. The memo asserted the case was closed and that the public should not anticipate further revelations.

That gesture has fueled public distrust. Some now think Trump’s previous friendship with Epstein, they were spotted together at social gatherings in the 1990s and early 2000s and Trump was listed on Epstein’s flight logs at least seven times is the reason the administration suddenly closed the files.

Lawyer of Epstein prior to his death, David Schoen, confirmed that Trump had denied any incriminating evidence against him. However, with the lack of transparency, speculations are increasing.

Protecting Druze, furthering its strategic interests, maintaining buffer zones: Understanding why Israel decided to launch strikes inside Syria

Anmol Kumar
-
0
Protecting Druze, furthering its strategic interests, maintaining buffer zones: Understanding why Israel decided to launch strikes inside Syria

West Asia is once again on the edge. What began as a local conflict in southern Syria’s Suwayda province between two communities—the Druze and the Bedouin—has escalated into a regional flashpoint. Israeli fighter jets have conducted over 160 airstrikes inside Syrian territory.

The trigger for this attack was brutal crackdown by the new Syrian government against the Druze minority, a group with deep historical and cultural ties to Israel. In response to the violence and mass executions of Druze civilians— videos of some of which have surfaced on social media—Israel Defence Forces started striking Syria, marking a sudden direct action not just for self-defence, but also humanitarian rescue.

However, this was not just about saving Druze but also about inflicting damage to the Syrian military and maintaining buffer zones between Israel and Syria. Israel has accepted an ex-Jihadist as a Syrian President for Geopolitical reasons, but through this attack, Israel made it clear that it will not accept religious and ethnic violence by the government in Syria.

Who are the Druze and why Israel cares

To understand Israel’s military response, we must first understand the Druze people.

The Druze are a small, tightly-knit religious community that emerged in the 10th century from Ismaili Shia Islam but have evolved into a distinct ethno-religious group. They live mainly in the mountainous regions of Syria, Lebanon, and Israel. In Israel, the Druze community is unique—they serve in the IDF (Israeli Defence Forces), participate in civil society, and are considered loyal citizens of the Jewish state. Their identity is intertwined with Israel’s own security fabric.

In southern Syria, particularly Suwayda, the Druze live close to Israel’s Golan Heights. This area has long served as a buffer between Israel and various jihadist groups operating during the Syrian civil war. For Israel, instability in this Druze-dominated region represents not just a humanitarian crisis but also a strategic nightmare. The possibility of another hostile front opening up—this time with Bedouin, which is unacceptable.

The latest round of violence started when a Bedouin tribe set up a checkpoint in Suwayda and reportedly attacked a Druze man. This led to a cycle of retaliations—kidnappings, executions, and tit-for-tat violence. The Syrian regime intervened, not as a neutral party, but in favour of the Bedouins. Local reports confirm that Syrian forces sided with the Bedouins, escalating the violence and leading to over 300 deaths in just a few days, including 27 Druze civilians reportedly executed in cold blood.

Israel issued several warnings to Damascus, urging it to stop targeting the Druze. These were ignored. When visual evidence of mass killings began to circulate, and Druze volunteers inside Israel started crossing the border to protect their brothers, the IDF stepped in. However, Israel’s strike was not limited to militias—it targeted the Syrian Ministry of Defence and army convoys, directly challenging the Al-Shara government’s role in the violence.

President Al-Shara fails Syrians

Al-Shara, the current president of Syria and an ex-Jihadist, had a wonderful chance to establish himself as the leader of Syria. Bring peace, prosperity, business and investment to the long-sanctioned Syrian society. Regional players like Saudi Arabia, Turkey and even to an extent Israel, with global players like the US, are positive towards him for different reasons.

He should understand the scenario and should protect Syrians rather than injecting violence into society. However, the attacks on the Druze minority tells a different story. After multiple warnings from Israel, Al-Shara did not act against the violence rather his forces supported it. This triggered the response from Israel.

America steps in—But it’s not that simple

The US has now stepped in, calling for restraint. However, its position is complicated. Syria is not part of the American camp. However, in recent years, under request from Turkey and Saudi Arabia, even Washington has engaged with Al-Shara when Trump was on a visit to West Asia. Both nations had their own reasons. Turkey wants to reduce refugee inflows. Saudi Arabia seeks to bring Syria into a broader Sunni axis.

That does not mean Syria is now an ally. Moreover, this is where the “bloc” theory fails. Global alliances today are transactional, not ideological. For example, just because India is talking to China does not mean it has joined the Chinese camp. Similarly, American outreach to Syria does not imply trust—it is tactical, driven by temporary needs.

The bigger picture: Israel’s future borders

Some analysts believe this move also fits into a larger Israeli vision—what some call “Greater Israel.” While this theory is often misused or exaggerated, the current reality is this: Israel wants stable, secure buffer zones around its borders, especially in regions where its own minorities, like the Druze reside.

By protecting the Druze, Israel not only wins the moral high ground but also gains influence over a strategic area of Syria. The goal is not to annex territory, but to ensure that enemies do not control it.

As of now, a ceasefire has reportedly been reached. However, Israel made clear that any further attack on the Druze Community will not be tolerated, even outside its borders and will invite a military response.

Russian woman who went missing with son amid custody battle with estranged Indian husband remains untraceable, not left India by legal means: Centre tells SC

ANI
-
0
Russian woman who went missing with son amid custody battle with estranged Indian husband remains untraceable, not left India by legal means: Centre tells SC

The central government informed the Supreme Court on Friday that the Russian woman who has allegedly absconded with her four-year-old boy amid child custody dispute with her Indian husband has not left the country through legal channels but remains “untraceable”.

Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati, who appeared for the Centre and Delhi police, stated that the Union Ministry of Home Affairs has issued ‘look out notices’ and ‘hue and cry’ notices to all senior police officials across the country to trace the missing Russian woman.

While hearing submissions, a bench led by Justice Surya Kant flagged several issues and directed the authorities to immediately enquire with Railway officials and other means (non-aerial) of public transport to trace any movement of the missing lady and the child.

The bench also directed the Delhi police to check CCTV footage of all entry and exit points in Delhi NCR, in their ongoing probe to find the Russian woman and the child.

“They need to do something very quickly”, Justice Surya Kant stated, flagging concern over the circumstances in which the missing lady may be and the safety of the child.

After issuing directions, the Supreme Court posted the matter for Monday, July 21.

During the hearing, the ASG also informed the Supreme Court that the officials of the Russian embassy have been cooperating in the matter.

The ASG further submitted that the Indian authorities have received a WhatsApp communication from the Russian embassy regarding the missing woman’s July 5 visit to the embassy. The communication stated that she visited the embassy for an hour seeking legal help over complaints that she had against her Indian husband, the ASG said.

The apex court was also informed that the External Affairs Ministry has confirmed that the Russian woman is untraceable even for her family members in Russia.

Notably, the counsel appearing for the Indian husband submitted that the husband’s family and he have been facilitating the authorities with all the information they have to help trace the missing Russian national and the child.

The Supreme Court had on Thursday issued specific directions to the concerned Central Ministries and the Delhi Police to issue look-out notices to trace the Russian woman who has allegedly absconded with her child, who was born out of wedlock with her Indian husband.

The top court had also issued directions to the concerned Indian authorities to seek permission from the Russian Embassy to enter the residential premises of an official of the Russian Embassy who was allegedly seen helping the Russian woman in entering the embassy premises in Delhi through the back door with her heavy luggage.

As per the communication received from the Russian embassy by the Indian government through a WhatsApp text, the missing woman had visited the embassy on July 5 to make complaints against her Indian husband and to seek legal help.

As per the submissions made on behalf of the Centre, the Russian woman who remains missing along with the child had made a transaction from her official bank account last week after which her account balance was reduced from ₹250 to ₹169, hinting that it’s unlikely that she’s fled the country as that would require a higher spending.

She has been untraceable since and has not left the country officially, the ASG stated. However, on being asked by the top court about the woman trying to flee the country through extralegal means, the ASG responded that she may be travelling domestically on foot or through other means (non-aerial) of public transport.

(This news report is published from a syndicated feed. Except for the headline, the content has not been written or edited by OpIndia staff)

UK to lower voting age to 16: A move towards strengthening democracy or a poor decision giving such responsibility to teens who may not be ready for it

Balendu Singh Angad
-
0
UK to lower voting age to 16: A move towards strengthening democracy or a poor decision giving such responsibility to teens who may not be ready for it

On Thursday, 17 July, the United Kingdom made the age of 16 the voting age in all UK elections within two years. It represents a fundamental change in democratic participation. However, this policy ignores evidence of artificial sleepiness about developmental readiness and external effects about the unique weaknesses of adolescents, which leads to the decision to potentially fail.

Neurological immaturity and cognitive limitations

According to modern neuroscience, the prefrontal cortex, which is responsible for complex decision making, undergoes development till mid-20s. At the age of 16, adolescents increased sensitivity to emotional impulses and colleague pressure, preferred short-term rewards over long-term consequences, with cognitive functions. This biological reality directly challenges claims of readiness for electoral decisions with decades-long societal impacts. As noted by researchers, 16-year-olds lack the “cold cognition” required for informed political judgments, particularly under stress or external influence. The UK government’s polling reinforces this: Only 18% of 16–17-year-olds expressed definite intent to vote, suggesting limited engagement with democratic responsibility.

Deficits in civic knowledge and life experience

By lowering the voting age, the UK government is ignoring the alarming gaps in civic literacy. Only 20% of 8th graders, who are typically aged between 13 to 14, score “proficient” in civics assessments globally. 31% of them failed to understand the foundational concepts of polity, such as constitutional governance and the rule of law. By the age of 16, these deficits remain the same. A Study conducted in the UK reveals that students have minimal retention of political knowledge outside the class. Apart from that, teachers are also shaping the students’ views based on their ideological biases (mainly left in the UK). The majority of 16-year-olds remain financially dependent on their parents, and most of them study in school. As one critic noted, “Idealism turns to reality as you learn and observe”—a transition incomplete before 18.

Empirical evidence of failed engagement

Supporters of the government are citing the 2024 Scottish independence referendum as a success story. But they are ignoring the contradictory data of the 2021 Welsh parliamentary elections. After being allowed to vote, only 37% of eligible 16–17-year-olds registered to vote. Even in Scotland, initial turnout surges faded rapidly. This aligns with the broader youth voting trends. In the 2019 UK elections, while people over the age of 65 saw 74% voter participation, turnout for 18–24-year-olds was just 47%, which shows that the young population of the UK doesn’t even want to vote in the elections.

Vulnerability to external influence

In current times, social media trends are shaped by political views. Most teenagers on social media are under the influence of those trends, such as the “Free Palestine movement, Global warming and free migration movement”. Apart from that, institutions like Harvard and Oxford are also shaping their political views (mostly left-leaning). A University of Exeter study found that their votes often mirror household preferences rather than independent analysis. Digital platforms exacerbate this by algorithms pushing polarised content, and peers—not policy platforms—sway decisions. Unlike adults with diverse life experiences, adolescents lack frameworks to critically evaluate manipulative narratives.

Oxford University students are doing a protest under the influence of the Free Palestine Movement | Photo Credit: Sky News

Inconsistent legal and social standards

The voting-age reduction creates a contradictory rights landscape. Sixteen-year-olds may vote but cannot:
•⁠ ⁠Legally marry without parental consent (England/Northern Ireland)
•⁠ ⁠Serve in combat roles
•⁠ ⁠Purchase alcohol, cigarettes, or lottery tickets
•⁠ ⁠Stand as electoral candidates

This inconsistency dilutes the “age of majority” principle. As Conservative critics argue, it is incoherent to deem adolescents mature enough to shape national policy yet legally incompetent to enter binding contracts or consume alcohol responsibly. Such disparities undermine the social contract and invite future challenges to age-based rights boundaries.

Conclusion: Preserving electoral integrity

Lowering the voting age prioritises symbolic inclusivity over electoral credibility. Without parallel investments in civics education or evidence that 16-year-olds sustainably engage in this reform, risks cementing transient preferences into law and straining democratic legitimacy. As the Electoral Commission concluded in 2004, 18 remains the international standard because it balances neurological maturity, life experience, and legal autonomy. The UK should heed Wales’ lesson: expanding access without solving engagement failures merely widens the electorate’s least participatory demographic. Until adolescents demonstrate consistent civic competence, the vote must remain an adult responsibility.

RBI to roll out climate change disclosure rules for banks and financial institutions, recognises climate change as a source of major financial concern: Read details

OpIndia Staff
-
0
RBI to roll out climate change disclosure rules for banks and financial institutions, recognises climate change as a source of major financial concern: Read details

The Reserve Bank of India is in the process of working out rules for banks and financial institutions for the disclosure and management of risks arising from climate change. The move is aimed at reducing carbon emissions by shifting high-emission investments to low-emission substitutes, to help achieve the country’s climate targets.

According to a report in Reuters, the central bank’s attempt is in line with the global efforts in shifting to low-carbon economies by assessing the amount of money being directed towards carbon-intensive activities as well as green investments. Similar disclosures have already been made compulsory in countries like the UK and Japan. However, the development comes against the backdrop of several global banks, including JP Morgan, Citibank, Morgan Stanley, and HSBC, whittling down their climate commitments after the re-election of Donald Trump as the US President.

Banks to include climate-change related risk in loan portfolios

Since 2022, the RBI has reportedly been working on the rules, which will require banks and financial institutions to make regular disclosures about climate-related risk in their loan portfolios, accompanied by mitigation strategies and targets. Initially, the disclosures are likely to be made voluntarily, effective from fiscal year 2027 and will eventually be made compulsory from the next fiscal year, i.e. 2028.

Under the central bank’s assessment rules for climate change, banks will also have to conduct periodic stress tests, based on the RBI’s soon-to-be-issued guidance note, to assess the impact of extreme weather or climate events such as floods, cyclones, and heat waves on borrowers and the economy. As per the draft rules, banks will also be required to calculate the total emissions of borrowers and disclose this information by asset classes and industries. These disclosures are expected to be included in the financial statements of the borrowers.

Climate change disclosures not expected to impact loan pricing in short term

A 52-page draft note of the RBI, accessed by Reuters, reportedly prescribes a methodology for predicting and analysing the impact of extreme climate events and transition risks on the ability of borrowers to repay loans. The transition risks include those arising from changes in consumer behaviour, policy, and technology as the world gradually shifts to a low-carbon economy. The climate change disclosures are not expected to impact loan pricing in the short term.

As per the report, the RBI earlier recognised climate change as a source of major financial concern. In 2024, the central bank released a draft standard disclosure framework to receive public feedback. Banks have started gearing up for the upcoming assessment rules. Several banks have reportedly started compiling data to meet the standards of the imminent disclosure rules. A few large banks have issued tenders to engage climate consultants to assist them with disclosures.

It is reported that the RBI’s decision to release climate disclosure rules is aligned with India’s aim of diverting the flow of resources to climate-friendly sectors, for which a draft framework was recently released. Ahead of the 2025 United Nations Climate Change Conference (COP30) to be held in Brazil in November, India, which aims to achieve net-zero carbon emissions by 2070, is preparing to publish a fresh national emissions-reduction target.

Tickets for Christopher Nolan’s ‘The Odyssey’ sold out at IMAX 70mm a year before July 2026 release, the movie on classic Greek mythology is first to be entirely shot on IMAX cameras

ANI
-
0
Tickets for Christopher Nolan’s ‘The Odyssey’ sold out at IMAX 70mm a year before July 2026 release, the movie on classic Greek mythology is first to be entirely shot on IMAX cameras

The tickets for Christopher Nolan’s upcoming film ‘The Odyssey’ went on sale in Imax 70mm film at 25 or 26 locations over the July 12-19 weekend, ahead of the movie’s release in 2026, reported The Hollywood Reporter.

According to the outlet, 95 percent of seats were sold, according to exhibition sources, representing approximately 1.5 million USD in sales, despite a relatively small pool of seats.

The ticket sales also included the Thursday screenings of July 16, 2026. The film is a take on the classic Greek myth–starring Matt Damon as the eternal hero Odysseus–is being shot entirely on IMAX film cameras, a first for a commercial feature.

Taking to their X handle, IMAX announced the special ticket sales of Odyssey, exactly a year before the film’s release.

As the night and day unfolded, there were reports of tickets being resold on eBay and other sites for anywhere between 300 and 400 USD, compared to an average retail price of 25-28 USD, said one source, reported The Hollywood Reporter.

This marks the first time in history that tickets have gone on sale a year before a film’s opening.

The hype for the film is above the roofs as this marks the next project for Nolan after the massive success of ‘Oppenheimer’, which did huge business in IMAX theatres.

There are roughly 16 IMAX sites in the U.S. that are part of the offering as of now. The July 17-19 weekend and preview showings are already entirely sold out at AMC Lincoln Square 13 in New York City, the Universal Cinema AMC at CityWalk Hollywood, and the Regal Irvine Spectrum in Orange County, reported The Hollywood Reporter.

Elsewhere in California, 77mm seats are almost sold out at IMAX locations in San Francisco, Dublin, and Ontario.

According to the outlet, other sell-out IMAX cinemas are in Fort Lauderdale, Florida; Buford, Georgia; Indianapolis, Indiana; Grand Rapids, Michigan; King of Prussia, Pennsylvania; and Dallas, Texas.

High-profile locations in Canada, where IMAX is headquartered, quickly sold out, including the Cineplex Cinemas Mississauga Square and the Cineplex Cinemas Vaughan, both in Toronto, reported The Hollywood Reporter.

Across the Atlantic, London’s famous BFI Imax is sold out, as is London’s Science Museum Imax auditorium.

According to The Hollywood Reporter, the IMAX screens ponied up more than 190 million USD of Oppenheimer’s total global gross of 975.8 million USD.

‘The Odyssey’ has a net budget of 250 million USD, which will make it the most expensive film of Nolan’s career.

In addition to Damon, the film stars Tom Holland, Anne Hathaway, Jon Bernthal, Anne Hathaway, Zendaya, Lupita Nyong’o, Robert Pattinson, Charlize Theron and Mia Goth.

The classic story follows the king of Ithaca as he undertakes a long and perilous journey home to his wife Penelope following the Trojan War.

His challenges are many as he spends years encountering a succession of mythical beings, including the Cyclops Polyphemus, the Sirens, the enchantress Circe, and travels to the Underworld, reported the outlet.

(This news report is published from a syndicated feed. Except for the headline, the content has not been written or edited by OpIndia staff)

Impressed businesses with lavish mansion, and then scammed them out of their money: How Mangaluru conman Rohan Saldanha duped multiple people of several crores

OpIndia Staff
-
0
Impressed businesses with lavish mansion, and then scammed them out of their money: How Mangaluru conman Rohan Saldanha duped multiple people of several crores

Rohan Saldanha, a 45-year-old ‘financier’, scammed several businessmen and industrialists in Mangaluru and duped them of 10s of Crores of money. His secrets were discovered by the Mangaluru Police after they conducted a raid at his luxurious home.

The process of his fraud was simple: First, he built trust by flaunting his wealth, then he proceeded with legal formalities, and finally vanished after collecting crores of rupees from his targets.

The police arrested him during the investigation, which left the officials shocked. Saldanha posed as a high-level financier and used his lavish bungalow in Jappinamogaru, Mangaluru, to lure investors into his trap. His targets were wealthy and ultra-rich entrepreneurs and individuals.

How did Rohan Saldanah set his bait

To kickstart his scam, Saldanha would invite clients to his luxurious home and office. After their visit and gaining their trust, he offered to arrange loans worth Rs 100 crore or more. To make the offer seem more authentic, he went a step further and introduced a fake lawyer, using the name of a well-known lawyer from the region. This led clients to believe in the legitimacy of the deal and even reached out to the lawyer for document verification and other legal formalities. He would then demand money from the clients for registration and stamp duty. This tactic alone brought him crores, and in some cases, he managed to extract up to Rs 10 crore from his ‘clients’. Once he received the money, he would disappear without a trace, leaving the victims devastated.

Police discovery

While searching his bungalow, the police uncovered more than just lavish interiors. His home had secret sections and hidden compartments, designed to be nearly undetectable, meant for sudden disappearances. Officers said that closets concealed these hidden areas, which allowed him to remain undetected whenever he needed. Investigators believe this setup helped him evade suspicious clients, unannounced visitors, and even law enforcement, allowing him to cut contact during critical moments.

In just a few months, the accused allegedly carried out fraudulent transactions amounting to Rs 40–50 crore. However, the total fraud committed over the years is believed to be significantly higher. So far, the police have filed three cases, two in Mangaluru and one in Chitradurga. Authorities suspect many more victims may be staying silent out of fear or shame. Acting on a complaint from one of the victims, Mangaluru Police arrested Rohan Saldanha and have since widened the investigation to uncover the full extent of his activities. They are also probing possible collaborators and urging other victims to come forward.

Delhi HC quashes 16 FIRs against 70 Indian Muslims who sheltered foreign Tablighi Jamaat members during Covid-19 outbreak: Read what were the charges and what the court said

Shraddha Pandey
-
0
Delhi HC quashes 16 FIRs against 70 Indian Muslims who sheltered foreign Tablighi Jamaat members during Covid-19 outbreak: Read what were the charges and what the court said

On the 18th of July 2025, the Delhi High Court quashed 16 FIRs filed against 70 Indian citizens accused of sheltering 190 foreign members of the Tablighi Jamaat. The foreign nationals came to Delhi to attend the congregation at Nizamuddin Markaz in 2020 during Covid outbreak.

The accused persons were booked under the provisions of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), the Epidemic Diseases Act, the Disaster Management Act and the Foreigners Act. The Tablighi Jamaat congregation was an early epicentre of COVID-19 outbreak in the country, as members from various states had attended the event and returned to their places carrying the virus after they were infected at the event.

Hearing a batch of petitions moved by advocate Ashima Mandla, Justice Neena Bansal Krishna said, “Chargesheets quashed.” The verdict in this case was reserved in April this year, and the same was pronounced on 17th July.

The case, associated with the Tablighi Jamaat gathering, was under legal examination due to its alleged impact on public health and its adherence to regulatory guidelines during the pandemic.

Representing the 70 Indian nationals, advocate Ashima Mandla earlier placed on record a compilation of judgements passed by other courts in relation to the incident. Advocate Mandakini Singh also appeared on behalf of the Petitioners.

The accused named in the matter were identified as Mohammad Anwar, Mohd. Tayyab, Sadar Irfan, Muktara, Mohd. Tahir, Shamim, Akhtar, Taijumal Islam, Attar Rehman, Majid Miyan, Basheer Ali, Mohd. Bilal Sheikh, Niyauddin Parveen Khan, Noor Bano Nashreen, Shahin Bee, Rubina Rao, Hussain, Mohd, Aslam, Mohd. Umar, Shahroz Anwar, Noor Ahmed, among others.

In April this year, the bench of Justice Neena Bansal reserved the judgement in a batch matter of 16 FIRs involving 70 Indian nationals associated with Tablighi Jamaat who were chargesheeted under sections 188/269/270/120-B IPC for housing foreign nationals in different masjids during the Covid-19 outbreak between March 24, 2020 and March 30, 2020.

The 195 foreign nationals who were housed by these Indian nationals were also named in the FIR; however, in most chargesheets, they were not chargesheeted or cognisance refused by the Trial Court, on principles of double jeopardy, as the same set of foreign nationals were chargesheeted for the same set of offences and had entered plea bargaining for purposes of repatriation or were discharged in an FIR.

What the Delhi High Court said in its judgement

The defence contended that FIRs against the accused persons be quashed on the grounds that allegations levelled against Indian Nationals in the aforesaid FIRs are prima facie “embellishments and exaggerations” which stare in the face of the record and are an abuse of the process of criminal law.

The petitioners further argued against allegations made against them that they were allegedly housed at Masjid Ek Minar, Haveli Kallu Khawas, Chitli Qabar, Delhi, for some time and remained housed till intervention by the Police officials on 01.04.2020. It is asserted that the allegations levelled in the impugned FIRs are bereft of legality as there are no specific allegations or evidence qua Petitioners for hosting or participating in a social/cultural/religious gathering which was essentially barred under Section 144 Cr.P.C.

The petitioners also submitted that a total ban on movement, i.e. Janta Curfew, was imposed on 22.03.2020, while Section 144 was imposed on 24.03.202,0, and a complete nationwide Lockdown was directed w.e.f. 25.03.2020, rendering the Petitioners remediless who had no recourse but to continue staying inside the Masjid, until taken into Institutional quarantine. The Petitioners, therefore, cannot be charged under

Section 188 IPC for merely residing in a mosque, and the charges are liable to be quashed. They also disputed the offence under Section 188 IPC, saying that for taking cognisance of an offence under Section 188 IPC, a written complaint of the Public Servant whose order has been contravened is mandatory. The prosecution for the offence under Section 188 IPC cannot be initiated based on the Chargesheet filed by the Police.

In addition, the petitioners argued that slapping IPC section 269 against the accused was inappropriate as no offence under this Section has been made out against the Petitioners. They further claimed that the addition of this section has fuelled prejudice and stigmatisation of the accused persons.

The court discussed the maintainability of the petition for quashing of the FIRs against the accused persons. After detailing the grounds for deeming the plea maintainable, the court delved into the sustainability of section 188 IPC in the Absence of Complaint by competent authority.

While the petitioners contended that the entire investigations have been undertaken by the Police without there being any complaint and thus be set aside, the prosecution alleged violation of order under Section 144 Cr.P.C. dated 24.03.2020 promulgated by ACPs of Darya Ganj, Sarai Rohilla and Krishna Nagar.

Regarding this the court said, “the record shows that a Complaint by the competent public officer had been made to the Court along with the Chargesheet and the cognizance has been taken on the basis of that Complaint. It cannot be said that there was no compliance of Section 195 Cr.P.C. in the present cases.”

The court highlighted that as per section 188 IPC, the Notification of the public servant must be in the actual knowledge of the person required him to do or abstain from doing some act. Acquiring or gaining of such knowledge is a pre-requisite. Any proof of general Notification promulgated by a public servant, would not satisfy the requirement. The court pointed out that the promulgation of a notification needs to be carried out by the issuing authority, although the law does not prescribe any specific mode to make the order known publicly and openly.

In the present case, the court said that it is not the case of the respondents that the Janta Curfew order was served on the petitioners by whatever means or was affixed on the premises or was gazetted on the relevant date.

The single judge bench noted that the State’s assertion that the requisite knowledge must be attributed to the petitioners, because the order was published in some newspapers, TV channels and social websites, etc, does not meet the requirement of promulgation since there is no averment that the newspapers/handbills were received by the Petitioner.

“There is no averment whatsoever to show that any information was actually conveyed to the Petitioners,” the court noted, adding that had there been any evidence of the Notification being published in the public media, there may have been a presumption of knowledge to the persons residing in the house, but there is no evidence to this effect as well.

While the court’s remarks suggest that there is no evidence of the notification being published in the public media, the same was widely reported in the media at that time.

The question here arises as to how the authorities would have ensured that everyone was informed about the order imposing a total ban on movement. By personally visiting each and every person’s residence or visiting the Markaz in this case? At a time when Covid-related news and updates dominated local or national television news headlines, digital media and social media discourse, is it really unlikely that the most of the people including the accused persons who must have had access to their mobile phones, if not television or newspapers, remained unaware of the notification issued under Section 144 Cr.P.C?

The Delhi High Court further observed that there is no evidence to show that the Tablighi Jamaat congregation, which was planned way before the outbreak of Covid, was held after the promulgation of the notification under Section 144.

“Firstly and foremost, there is nothing on record to show that they had congregated after the promulgation of the Notification under Section 144 Cr.P.C. These Petitioners were already present in the Markaz and after the imposition of the complete lockdown, there was no way possible for them to have dispersed; rather their stepping out of the houses would have been violation of the complete lockdown and also of the potential of spreading of commutable disease of COVID-19,” the court said, adding the accused persons were “helpless people, who got confined on account of lockdown.”

The court also remarked that the chargesheet filed by the Delhi Police does not make any mention of any of the accused persons being found Covid-19 positive or having stepped out of the Markaz after 24th March 2020.

“There is not a whisper in the entire Chargesheet that any of these petitioners were found COVID-19 positive or that they had stepped out of the Markaz after 24.03.2020 or that they were likely to spread COVID-19. Also, there is not a single averment of them having not rendered any assistance to the surveillance personnel,” the court said.

All excerpts taken from relevant court order

Moreover, the court said that even if it is assumed that there was “due promulgation” of the notification under section 144, “no violation of any of the activities prohibited by the Notification has been made out in the entire chargesheet.”

“It is therefore, held that the cognizance for the offence under Section 188 IPC is bad as no prima facie case is made out and the Petitioners are entitled to be discharged under Section 188 IPC,” the court said.

Quashing the charges under IPC sections 269 and 270, the court observed that the prosecution did not produce any material evidence to prove that the accused had indulged in any act which contributed to the spread of Covid. “No material was produced in the chargesheet and no evidence was placed on record to substantiate the fulfilment of ingredients of Sections 269 and 270 IPC… Even if all the evidence as put forth in the chargesheet is admitted, no offence under Sections 269 and 270 IPC has even prima facie been made out…,” the court ruled.

Charges under Section 3 of the Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897, and Section 51 of the Disaster Management Act, 2005, were also quashed since “… there is no averment of any government official being obstructed or there being any refusal to comply with any directions issued by the government. No offence under Section 51 of the Disaster Management Act, 2005, has therefore, been made out… There is no averment about which order taken out under the Disaster Management Act has been violated. It is not shown that there was any criminal act, whether under the Disaster Management Act or the Epidemic Diseases Act, committed by the petitioners. The FIRs under these two sections are also liable to be quashed.”

In conclusion, the court order dated 17th July 2025, stated: “In the light of the aforesaid discussion, it is held that no offence under Sections 188/269/270/271 of IPC and Section 3 of the Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897, Section 51 of the Disaster Management Act, 2005 is even prima facie made out in the Chargesheets.”

What the Delhi Police’s chargesheet had stated

The Delhi Police Crime Branch registered an FIR under various sections of the IPC, the Epidemic Diseases Act, the Disaster Management Act, and against Indian and foreign nationals in connection with alleged violations during the COVID-19 outbreak

A series of chargesheets were filed, with many foreign nationals entering plea bargains. Additionally, 28 FIRs were registered across Delhi against 193 individuals, leading to quashing petitions before the Delhi High Court. Questions arose regarding the legal validity of charges against petitioners, particularly under sections of the IPC that require specific procedural conditions. Courts across India have previously quashed similar cases, citing ‘procedural lapses’ and ‘insufficient evidence’.

It must be recalled that in the last week of March 2020, hundreds of Tablighi Jamaat attendees were found living inside the markaz, many of whom were in violation of their visa rules. Many of the attendees were reportedly found to be COVID-19 positive, and despite showing symptoms, had continued to stay there or move to the interiors of the country without getting themselves tested. Subsequently, many were moved to quarantine centres to ensure treatment and arrest the spread of the virus. However, even then, many Tablighi Jamaat attendees had attacked healthcare workers and even created ruckus at quarantine centres.

The Delhi Police’s chargesheet filed against the Tablighi Jamaat mentions that the Malaysian and Indonesian nationals who attended the gathering were carriers of the deadly virus and which led initial wave of coronavirus in India. The charge sheet talks about similar gatherings in Malaysia, which ended up being a super-spreader event. It also talked about a cancelled event in Indonesia where Covid-19 cases were reported before the outbreak in Delhi. Markaz Nizamuddin became the Covid hotspot and allegedly played a vital role in spreading it across the country.

Police mentioned in the chargesheet that the gathering in Malaysia between 27th and 1st March 2020, resulted in 500 COVID-19 cases in that country. An event scheduled for 18th  March in Indonesia was cancelled because of the authorities’ concerns. By that time, 25 people were already dead, and 309 were infected in that country. The chargesheet said that people from Malaysia, Indonesia, and other countries came to India to participate in the Markaz gathering in Nizamuddin. As per the police, they acted as carriers of the virus.

In the chargesheet, it was said that the CDMO/Southeast district contacted Markaz authorities on 19th March and asked to maintain social distancing and ensure home quarantine after an Indonesian man tested positive in Telangana. He had a history of travelling to Delhi for the Markaz gathering. Delhi Police contacted a Markaz official named Haji Yunus and asked him that there should not be more than 20 Jamaatis in Nizamuddin at any given time.

On 21st  March 2020, Delhi Police called Mufti Shahzad and asked him to immediately ensure that foreign nationals leave for their respective states or countries. When the lockdown was announced on 24th March, Delhi Police issued prohibitory orders, but no official from Benglewali Masjid Markaz took any precautionary steps. On 25th  March, a medical team was sent for the first time as there were reports that no one was following social distancing orders, and a Jamaati from Bangladesh started to show symptoms of COVID-19. On inspection, the police found that there were 526 foreign nationals and 1,183 Indians at the Markaz.

It must be recalled that in back in April 2020, in Haryana’s Palwal, three Bangladeshi men who attended the Tabilghi Jamaat event in Delhi’s Nizamuddin had tested positive. These Bangladeshi nationals, along with several other,s stayed in various mosques in villages of the Palwal area after attending the Delhi event of Tablighi Jamaat.

On 28th March 2020, the SHO of Hazrat Nizamuddin sent a written complaint to DCP Crime Branch and informed them about the alleged violation by the head of Markaz Maulana Saad and management. Lawyer for Tabhligi Jamaat, advocate Mujeez Rehman said, What good is an advisory by the administration at that time, asking to ensure social distancing? Tablighi members were self-isolated in Nizamuddin. Authorities should have shut down airports, screened passengers, and undertaken contact tracing.”

Once police started to track Jamaatis across countries, they found clusters of Covid positive cases across the country who came in contact with these Markaz members. The information provided by Markaz was incomplete or unverified in many cases, and it became hard for the administration to track jamaatis on time. They even tried to project that it is a conspiracy of the Indian government to defame Jamaatis.

It must be recalled that back in April 2020, the Deputy Commissioner of South Andaman District ordered to register FIR against two people Farzan Ali and S Rehman. who tested positive for COVID-19 for giving misleading information as authorities tried tracing their contacts. The duo, who had attended the controversial Islamic event in Delhi, have been giving wrong information about the places they visited during the home quarantine period apart from violating the terms and conditions of home quarantine

The Central government had told the Supreme Court in an earlier statement that the Markaz management deliberately disregarded police instructions to send back its members.

However, in the present case, the Delhi High Court not only quashed all the charges against the accused persons but court observations also present the accused as some sort of victims who have been needlessly villainised.

Ujjain: Govt school teacher Shakeel Mohammad burns pics of Hindu gods, threatens students, forces them to do Namaz and read Quran

OpIndia Staff
-
0
Ujjain: Govt school teacher Shakeel Mohammad burns pics of Hindu gods, threatens students, forces them to do Namaz and read Quran

A government school teacher named Shakeel Mohammad reportedly set fire to images of Hindu deities and Bharat Mata, in the Ujjain district of Madhya Pradesh. Additionally, he attempted to burn the national flag. He is also accused of forcing Quran and Namaz upon the students.

The matter pertains to a secondary school in the village of Nagpura, located in Mahidpur. A student of the institution informed his uncle, Rohit Rathore, about the Muslim man’s outrageous actions.

According to the students, on 11th July, he destroyed the images of Lord Ganesha, Goddess Saraswati and Bharat Mata in front of the students and set them ablaze. According to media reports, Rohit Rathore came to the school following a complaint on 16th July.

He talked to other students who witnessed the incident and confirmed that the same was true. The families of other pupils then came together and captured visuals of the destroyed pictures after which the recordings were handed over to the authorities.

Afterward, Rohit Rathore launched a complaint against the accused. He informed that his nephew, Anurag Rathore is a student in the sixth grade at Madhyamik Vidyalaya Nagpur. He disclosed Shakeel Mohammad had burnt photographs of Hindu gods and Bharat Mata before the students and threatened to kill them if they revealed the occurrence to anyone.

Furthermore, the perpetrator exerted pressure on students to perform Namaz and read Quran during class and declared that he will instruct them how to do it. He also used offensive language towards the parents of the students. He reportedly behaved in a similar manner when he taught at the school in the Lasudiya Mansoor area previously. He has been known to repeat such actions while serving at other schools as well.

Shakeel Mohammad has been arrested and a case has been booked under section 298, 351(3) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) against him. The police presented him in Mahidpur court and sent him to jail. District Education Officer Anand Sharma has also suspended him from his position.

Hindu organistaions also protested after the matter came to light. The workers of Vishva Hindu Parishad and Bajrang Dal surrounded the police station and demonstrated against him. They submitted a memorandum to the police station in-charge and demanded strict action.

1...241242243...7,604Page 242 of 7,604