Home Blog Page 3164

Current inflation caused by global events over which Indian govt have no control: OpIndia talks to a chartered accountant, Sumeet Mehta, over inflation

Amid the global uncertainty over economy due to the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war, inflation has become a major concern. Earlier this month, the Reserve Bank of India raised the repo rate by 40 basis points to 4.40%, to combat rising inflation. RBI governor Shaktikanta Das defended this decision by saying that the Central Bank chose price stability over growth as RBI feels that India’s macroeconomic fundamentals are intact, barring food and fuel inflation.

“The worsening outlook of inflation warrants timely action to forestall second round effects which could lead to unanchoring of inflation expectations. Heightened uncertainty and volatile financial markets could also add to such unhinging of expectations. Accordingly, decisive and measured monetary policy response is necessary to avoid any unintended shocks to the economy”, the governor had said.

The retail inflation was 7.79% in April, a 8 year high, and RBI expects it to be remain high as the Russia-Ukraine war is expected to run longer than earlier anticipated. In this backdrop, OpIndia talked to Chartered Accountant Sumeet Mehta to know more about the situation. Here is a transcript of the interview.

1.   Today inflation has emerged as a big challenge. Every person is noticing it in their day to day life. What is the source of this inflation?

Mehta- A study on the impact of Russian invasion on inflation done by the economists in SBI found that 59 per cent of the jump in prices is due to geopolitical events. This is also called imported inflation, because the major reason for inflation is increase in global commodity prices including crude, metals, agricultural produce, and fertilizers. Increase in crude prices has resulted in higher fuel prices, pushing transportation costs northwards. Add to that, the global crisis arising from shortage of ships due to war has increased freight and charter costs.

2.   Is this an Indian problem?

Mehta- No, this is a global problem. Majority of the countries in the world are facing the problem of inflation. In her Speech dated 11th May 2022 in Vienna on the issue of the globalisation of inflation, Isabel Schnabel, Member of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank, said that “In April, inflation in the euro area is expected to have increased to a new record high of 7.5%, causing significant concern among firms and households. Because the euro area is a net importer of energy, this surge in inflation is often referred to as “imported inflation” – in other words, inflation over which monetary policy has no, or very little, control.”

Now compare this with India, who is also an importer of energy (read crude oil), and compare that with the inflation in India, which is 7.8%. Even in OECD countries, inflation surged to 8.8% in March 2022 due to increase in energy prices.

3.   What can the govt do to control inflation and to protect the people?

Mehta- There is very little leg room for the government to manage this crisis. India imports potash fertilizers from Ukraine and Russia. Now that supply has got disrupted and potash prices have shot up globally. Though, the government of India has not increased the prices in the local market and is subsidizing potash, so that farmers don’t feel the pain of increased potash prices.

However, these subsidies are inflationary in nature, because it results in a higher fiscal deficit, which in turn pushes inflation northwards. Add to that, the government will have to increase its borrowings, which will result in pulling out liquidity from money markets, again driving interest rates upwards. This in turn will result in higher borrowing cost for the government, and that will have a negative impact in the form of higher fiscal deficit. This again will push inflation upwards.

My intent to explain this whole cycle is to highlight how this is a vicious cycle and we will get hurt from all sides, irrespective of whatever means we use to curb inflation.

As such, the government is providing food grains and daal to below poverty line people at a highly subsidized cost, which is much below the cost of production and price at which the government purchases it. In this manner the government has ensured that the BPL section is largely cushioned from the increase in inflation, especially food price inflation.

However, the middle class is not within the BPL benefit net, and hence they aren’t protected from rising inflation. If at all the government decides to bring the middle class within the subsidized food grain and daal scheme, then the fiscal deficit will shoot up significantly, and that will result in higher inflation. So, there is no easy solution for this problem.

4.   What should the people do to protect themselves?

Mehta- Everyone’s financial situation is different. So generally speaking it can be said that people need to be aware of the impact a spike in inflation has on their income and saving goals. The measures one takes depend on their personal situation. Someone may change the oil they use or temper the usage. Someone may look for alternative investment avenues for their savings etc. Awareness is important.

Sumeet Mehta is a Chartered Accountant by qualification and a corporate finance professional with 20 plus years of experience in equity research and private equity investment banking. He specialises in real estate and infrastructure finance and advisory, including PPP, and has authored the book “Diagnosing GST for Doctors”. Mehta has Closely worked with Ministry of Housing and Environment, Government of Maldives and Urban Development Authority, Government of Sri Lanka.

Kerala: Bajrang Dal holds massive “Shourya Rally” in response to Islamist organization PFI’s ‘Save the Republic’ march

On Saturday (May 21), the Hindu organization Bajrang Dal held a massive Shourya rally in the Alappuzha district of Kerala. The rally was in response to the Islamist outfit Popular Front of India’s ‘Save the Republic’ march. Reportedly, the ‘Save the Republic’ campaign was started by the PFI on Republic Day this year.

Although Bajrang Dal had plans to stage its march in the evening, the police claimed that it could lead to a law and order situation.

“The country cannot be consigned to anti-nationals and religious terrorists,” Bajrang Dal said in a statement. Earlier a writ petition was filed before the Kerala High Court, seeking to ban both rallies by PFI and Bajrang Dal. The Court had directed the police to ensure that the PFI event did not lead to any law and order situation.

Prior to the start of the event, PFI had shared that a grand people’s conference will be held in Alappuzha as part of a nationwide campaign. “People from all over the State are expected to take part in the program, which is beginning shortly,” PFI had tweeted.

In a Facebook post, the radical organization had informed that the event would be inaugurated by Chairman Oma Salam. Former Rajya Sabha member Obaidullah Khan Azmi was invited as the Chief of the ‘volunteer march.’

Oma Salam told The Indian Express that PFI would lead in safeguarding the ‘Republic of India.’ He also claimed that the ongoing dispute over the Gyanvapi Masjid is a part of RSS agenda.

While speaking about the rally, PFI leader Yahiya Thangal alleged, “Indian Muslims are on the brink of a genocide. Sanyasi meetings have been reduced to debates about Muslim genocide. In Kerala, even former legislators, who are part of secular and democratic parties, have been uttering hate against Muslims.”

He further claimed, “We are going to have a very strong campaign against the RSS. The Save the Republic campaign will continue till August this year. After Saturday’s rally in Alappuzha, a similar event would be held in Kozhikode on August 6.”

PFI, SDPI extremist outfits indulging in serious acts of violence

Earlier on May 5, the Kerala High Court observed that the Popular Front of India (PFI) and the Social Democratic Party of India (SDPI) are extremist organisations, which have not yet been banned in India.

The court made the remarks while hearing the petition of the wife of deceased RSS worker A Sanjith, seeking a probe by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). “No doubt, SDPI and PFI are extremist organisations indulging in serious acts of violence. All the same, those are not banned organisations,” Justice K Haripal had stated.

The Kerala High Court further noted that both SDPI and PFI have a history of attacking members of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh. It added, “It is the common case that activists of the SDPI/PFI were behind the attack.”

“There were clashes between the activists of the SDPI/PFI on the one hand and activists of the RSS on the other. There are series of attacks and counter-attacks between them,” Justice K Haripal emphasised.

Self-manifested Jyotirlinga of Lord Adi Vishweshwara lies 100 feet below the surface at the disputed Gyanvapi site: Advocate Rastogi in Court

On Friday, May 20, 2022, Advocate Rastogi argued in the Allahabad High Court that there is a self-manifested Jyotirlinga of Adi Vishweshwara at the site of the disputed Gyanvapi structure.

In the Allahabad High Court, Vijay Shankar Rastogi, the counsel for Lord’s next friend, told Live Law that the Shivling found in the wuzukhana is not the Shivling of Adi Vishweshwar, it is Tarakeshwar Mahadev. He said that the Shivling of Adi Vishweshwara may be just below the central dome of the Gyanvapi structure. This self-manifested Shivaling is located 100 feet below the earth’s surface.

It should be noted that self-manifested means that which has appeared itself, i.e. which has not been created. In this sense, Lord Adi Vishweshwara is believed to have manifested himself as the Shivling, which represents the form of Lord Shiva. According to the Puranas, the Shivling at Kashi is one of the 12 Jyotirlingas and is the oldest. The Jyotirlingas have a long history and their description is inscribed in many Hindu scriptures including the Vedas, Upanishads, and Puranas.

Advocate Rastogi said, “During the British rule, an old map of the Vishwanath temple was made by the then District Magistrate of Varanasi, James Prinsep. That map is mentioned in ‘History of Banaras written by Dr. AS Altekar (Head of Department, BHU Varanasi)’. It shows which places were the temples of which deity.

Vijay Shankar Rastogi, appearing for Adi Vishweshwar in the Kashi Vishwanath and Gyanvapi Mosque case, which has been going on in the civil court of Varanasi since 1991, said that on the basis of that map, the location of the wuzukhana points to the Tarakeshwar temple. He said that this temple was demolished and flattened. Rastogi said that if it is a Shivling, it can be of the same Tarakeshwar Mahadev.

The Vishweshwara temple was demolished several times by invaders

According to Dr. Vishwanath Pandey, a former officer on special duty at Kashi Hindu University, the proof of the construction of the Kashi Vishwanath temple five times is found in history. The first was built by Maharaja Vikramaditya near the Varuna-Ganga Sangam 2050 years ago. Fahian, the first Chinese traveler who came to Kashi in 402 AD to learn Sanskrit, has written about seeing the Shivling of emerald of Adi Vishweshwara consecrated by Maharaja Vikramaditya.

For the second time, the Vishweshwar temple was built near the pond of Ganj, but the historians did not get any specific information about this place. Dr. Vishwanath Pandey said that during the archaeological excavation at Rajghat in Varanasi, a 2,500 years old Avimukteshwar seal was found, which was associated with the worship of Lord Shiva.

According to the book ‘Kashi Ka Itihas’ written by Raja Motichand of Kashi, the Adi Kashi Vishweshwar was broken for the first time by Qutubuddin in 1194 AD. After that, the temple was rebuilt, but in 1447 AD, the then Sultan of Jaunpur, Mahmud Shah Sharki, demolished it again.

After this, in 1585, during the reign of Akbar, Raja Man Singh built the Kashi Vishweshwar temple through finance minister Todarmal. Narayan Bhatt had helped in this construction. It was demolished and in 1669 AD Aurangzeb built the disputed Gyanvapi structure.

During the reign of Aurangzeb, Raja Jai Singh ‘II’ built Adi Vishweshwara temple in 1680 AD. After that, in 1780 AD, Maharani Ahilyabai Holkar got the Kashi Vishwanath temple ready. It is said that in this temple, the original argha (on which the Shivling is installed) of Lord Adi Vishweshwar temple is kept to protect it from the Muslim invaders.

As anti-conversion ordinance becomes reality in Karnataka, police arrest Kerala’s Christian pastor couple for forcefully converting over 1000 Adivasis

The day the Karnataka Governor Thawar Chand Gehlot gave his assent and promulgated the ordinance brought in by the government on the anti-conversion Bill, the state police Tuesday, May 17, arrested a Christian Kerala-based pastor couple for forcing Adivasis to convert to Christianity in the Kodagu district. According to reports, the couple is accused of the illegal conversion of more than 1000 Hindus working in the coffee estates of Kodagu district. 

The couple namely, Pastor V. Kuriyachan (62) and his wife Selenamma (57) was arrested under IPC Section 295A (deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings of any class by insulting its religion or religious beliefs), a cognisable and non-bailable offence punishable with up to three years in jail. After being arrested the couple was sent to 14 days of judicial custody on Tuesday. The incident, however, came to the fore only on Wednesday.

Police said that despite the fact that the anti-conversion law has been notified, they are yet to receive any information that would allow them to charge the pastor couple under the new law. For the time being, the couple has been charged under relevant provisions of the Indian Penal Code, and if necessary, they would be charged under the new law depending on higher-ups’ orders.

Notably, the Karnataka Right to Freedom of Religion Ordinance got the assent of Karnataka governor Thawar Chand Gehlot on Tuesday. It aims to prevent conversions under various circumstances. A jail term of 3-5 years and a fine of Rs 25,000 has been proposed for people violating the law and converting people from general categories and a jail term of 3-10 years and a fine of Rs 50,000 for people converting minors, women and persons from the SC and ST communities.

Meanwhile, according to reports, some Bajrang Dal members had caught the Christian Pastor couple red-handed while trying to convert a tribal couple in Karnataka’s Kodagu district’s Manchahalli village and filed a written complaint in the matter. The police arrived at the scene and took the two into custody.

The pastor couple was reportedly caught trying to get Paniyaravara Mutha, a tribal, and his family to pray with them after handing over copies of the Bible.

Mutha said in a written complaint that the pastor and his wife attempted to convert them to Christianity in the same way that they had previously converted his nephew and niece-in-law. The nephew and his wife have been regularly attending church in Tholpetty, a village in Kerala’s Wayanad district. Muthu added that the pastor often used his nephew’s example to convince him to embrace Christianity.

Sajan Ganapathy, a member of the Hindu organisation was quoted by The Telegraph as saying that they got a “tip-off” about the conversion and rushed to Mutha’s house. “The couple had come ready to convert them and even had a list of people whom they had already converted in the area. So we handed them over to the police,” Ganapathy said.

Despite the consistent efforts of mainstream media to whitewash forced religious conversion by calling it a figment of ‘right wing’ imagination, the fact is that this menace has been increasingly plaguing many parts of the country in the last few years. In fact, as recently as May 18, a Hindu woman from Tamil Nadu had attempted to set herself on fire in front of the Ramanathapuram Collector’s office after being forced to convert to Christianity.

Calcutta HC orders CBI-NIA probe into forceful conversions, VHP demands strong anti-conversion law

On May 19, OpIndia reported how the Calcutta High Court ordered a joint probe by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and the National Investigation Agency (NIA) into the allegations of forceful religious conversions at Kaliachak in Malda district of West Bengal. 

The matter came to light after a video of a female BJP worker, narrating the ordeal of the said women, went viral on social media. In the undated video, the BJP worker informed that several posters had come up near the post office in the Englishbazar area of the Malda district. The protesting women were seen holding several placards saying that the police officer is forcing them to convert to Islam. They had also hung several banners behind them in front of the Malda post office saying that they will resist this and will not change their religion.

Amiya Kumar Sarkar, east zone secretary of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad demanded a strong anti-conversion law for the state to check illegal proselytization of innocent Hindus and stop Jihadi barbarism

What Rahul Gandhi said about Industry, Industrialists and business in London, and how he regurgitated PM Modi’s ideas that he insults and mocks in India

On Friday, Rahul Gandhi stirred up a hornet’s nest by making some of the most controversial statements defining his ‘Idea of India’ at a conference in the United Kingdom. The Gandhi-scion discussed several issues, where he promoted sub-nationalism besides instigating anarchy in the country by calling for a ‘mass action’ against the Indian state.

In his talk at the ‘Ideas for India’ conclave in the United Kingdom, the Congress leader also discussed the issues of India’s sectors of the economy and his ideas about India’s growth story. Rahul Gandhi touched upon several topics ranging from jobs, industrial sector revival, business environment and the role of private and public sectors in the country.

During the event, the interviewer put out false assertions about the growth of the Indian economy asking Rahul Gandhi to share his views on the present state of the Indian economic planning. The interviewer misleadingly suggested that the Indian economy has declined over the past four years, especially the last year. However, it is untrue that the Indian economy has slid in the previous year as a UN report suggests that India is still the fastest-growing economy despite the ongoing Ukraine conflict that has impacted the global GDP.

Responding to a question, Rahul Gandhi shared his ideas on the economic front, however, he ended up reiterating the same policies and ideas of the Modi government. On the question of manufacturing, Rahul Gandhi claimed that he believed that India needs to focus on its manufacturing sector, especially on the revival of Small and Medium Enterprises in India.

The Gandhi-scion noted that the Chinese dominate the production, just like the Americans once did, and added that India could not fulfil the promises of its people without a robust production system. Rahul Gandhi said the jobs for the vast majority of the people could be given only by focusing on the manufacturing sector.

“Moving from an idea that growth is enough to an idea where growth is important, but production and manufacturing are key. I think there is a huge opportunity for us if we think about it properly,” said Rahul Gandhi, emphasising the need to build a strong manufacturing sector in India.

Essentially, Rahul Gandhi was highlighting the very same vision often shared by Prime Minister Modi, whose government has been on the task of reviving India’s manufacturing sector in the last eight years. The Modi government has launched several mission-mode projects, including the ambitious ‘Make in India’ program to place India on the world map as a manufacturing hub. The government aims to create 100 million new jobs in the sector by 2022. The Modi government has launched several incentive schemes to promote setting up of manufacturing plants, and has seen good participation from the industry in the initiative.

Ironically, Rahul Gandhi, who often insults and mocks the Prime Minister over his economic policies, is regurgitating the same ideas which have been translated into action by the Modi government. Ever since the Modi government came to power, the manufacturing sector had contributed 25.92 per cent of the Gross Value Added (GVA) of the economy in 2021, which was less than 17 per cent in 2014 when UPA was in power.

Rahul Gandhi’s ideas mimic the Modi government’s policies on MSME

Further, Rahul Gandhi also stressed another concept of the importance of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and their role in creating employment. He claimed that the SME sector had been systematically attacked and destroyed by the BJP through his initiatives such as demonetisation, Goods and Service Tax and the farm laws.

The Congress MP also added that it is essential that SMEs be strengthened and a proper funding system to support them.

In fact, it seems like Rahul Gandhi has picked up these very ideas straight from the BJP. One of the most successful interventions of the Modi government, especially in the last few years, is its major focus on the MSME sectors. As many as 28 schemes and several packages have been launched by MSME Ministry in the previous eight years to provide impetus to the MSME sector. More than Rs.3 lakh crore collateral-free automatic loans have been disbursed for MSMEs to meet their operational liabilities and restart businesses that suffered from the pandemic.

Perhaps, Rahul Gandhi wants the Modi government to credit him for its policies on the MSME sector.

Also, citing China’s success in the manufacturing sector, Rahul Gandhi highlighted that they have taken their traditional networks and supported them through finance. We have clusters across the country, in every state, and we need to connect these clusters to the financial system of the country, he said.

Yet again, Rahul Gandhi’s idea revolved around integrating small and medium-sized industries into the formal economy, besides bringing these entities under the financial system. The Modi government has successfully implemented several schemes such as MUDRA, Stand Up India scheme, Atma Nirbhar packages, etc., to aid the SMEs. Besides schemes like Jan Dhan Yojana, an Emergency credit line, the digital economy has only provided a fillip to the MSME sector.

Rahul Gandhi’s flip-flop on the private sector

Repeating his usual rhetoric on big industrialists, Rahul Gandhi also claimed that there were only two business houses that were in control of the manufacturing sector in the country. Rahul Gandhi also flip-flopped on his position on the private versus the public sector debate, an issue which has taken the limelight in recent months.

Rahul Gandhi, who otherwise is a very great critic of the private sector, claimed that the private sector is the one which drives the economy and added that the public sector has to operate in areas which are only strategic and key. Rahul Gandhi also noted that the private sector should be freed from the bureaucracy and the attack that has been taking place from the ‘deep state’.

Rahul Gandhi again makes the same mistake of parroting the ideas of the Modi government. The Gandhi-scion has been so far very critical of the Modi government over its privatisation drive. Every time the government plans to sell its stakes from the loss-making PSUs, Rahul Gandhi has attacked them, saying that PM Modi was selling the country’s assets to his ‘industrialist friends’.

In fact, the Modi government has a strategic vision for disinvestment of the public sector undertakings, and it is also in the process of selling or closing down loss-making PSUs, just as we saw in the recent case of Air India. The centre intends to keep control of certain PSUs that operate in the strategic sector and wants to dissolve or disinvest in the non-strategic sector.

The very ideas of the Modi government are now being stressed by Rahul Gandhi, a strong opponent of the Modi government. It seems like Rahul Gandhi appreciates the policies pursued by the Modi government, however, he feels he is too entitled to appreciate them within India and has now found a foreign soil to sell them as his own ideas.

Strangely, Rahul Gandhi takes a u-turn again during his speech as he refers to the Modi government’s privatisation drive as “very dangerous”. He also said that most of the country’s key infrastructures are owned by one company, indirectly hinting at Adani Group.

“I think it’s very dangerous for one company to control all airports, all ports, all the infrastructure. It (Private sector monopoly) has never existed in this form. It has never existed with such a massive concentration of power & capital,” said Rahul.

The Gandhi-scion also made some unverified claims against the central agencies saying the CBI and the Enforcement Directorate were extorting businesses.

Besides Rahul Gandhi, opposition leaders, including CPI(M) ‘s Sitaram Yechury, RJD’s Tejashwi Yadav and TMC’s Mahua Moitra, have also travelled to London to participate in the event organised by the non-profit think-tank Bridge India.

Complaint filed against TMC’s Mohua Moitra, Saba Naqvi and others for their tweets against Shivling: Here is what they had said

A complaint has been filed against TMC MP Mahua Moitra, ‘journalist’ Saba Naqvi, Retd IAS Surya Pratap Singh, Peace Party’s Shadab Chouhan and RJD leader Kumar Divashankar for making derogatory tweets against Lord Shiva after the discovery of a Shivling inside the wuzukhana of the disputed Gyanvapi mosque.

Following the discovery of a Shivling inside the disputed structure, several people, including Mahua Moitra, Saba Naqvi, Surya Pratap Singh, Shadab Chouhan and others had made disparaging posts against Lord Shiva, in a bid to take a sly dig at the Shivling discovered inside the Gyanvapi mosque.

Disparaging tweets made against Shivling

Inveterate fake news peddler Saba Naqvi shared a picture of Bhabha Atomic Research Centre to take a swipe at the Shivling discovered inside the Gyanvapi compound.

Source: Twitter

Attributing it to Whatsapp, Naqvi shared an image of a huge dome that said “Huge Shivling discovered at the Bhabha Atomic Research Centre.”

However, soon after she shared the picture, a raft of social media users objected to her tweet, accusing Naqvi of hurting the religious sentiments of Hindus by insulting Shivling and trivialising a consequential discovery made at the Gyanvapi mosque that could have profound implications in determining the result of the ongoing dispute.

Naqvi deleted the tweet and apologised for her callous tweet mocking Lord Shiva. However, others who mocked the Hindu God showed little concerns for the feelings of Hindus.

TMC MP Mahua Moitra too had shared a picture of Bhabha Atomic Research Centre with a snide remark saying that hope it is not next on the digging list.

Shovling Moitra
Source: Twitter

Even though, social media users accused her of mocking Shivling and hurting the sentiments of Hindus, the said tweet continues to remain on Moitra’s Twitter page.

RJD leader Kumar Divashankar made a derogatory reference to Shivling in his tweet mocking the BJP. 

Shivling Moitra
Source: Twitter

Peace Party’s Shadab Chouhan, who is known for his polarising tweets, posted a scornful tweet after a Varanasi court ordered to seal Gyanvapi mosque after a Shivling was found inside its wuzukhana. Chouhan had posted a picture of a curb-side lined with small poles to claim judge would seal the area if someone makes a claim of Shivling.

Shivling Moitra
Source: Twitter

Shivling discovered inside the wuzukhana of Gyanvapi mosque

On completion of the videographic survey of Gyanvapi mosque on Monday (May 16), petitioner Sohan Lal Arya informed the media that a Shivling was found inside the complex of the disputed structure. The Shivling was reportedly recovered after draining out the water from wuzukhana, the place for ceremonial ablution that Muslims have to undergo before offering namaz.

Baba mil gaye…Jiski Nandi pratisha kar rahi this(The Shivling has been found. The sacred bull Nandi was waiting for it),” he exclaimed. “We already knew what was inside… but found more than what we had imagined,” the petitioner emphasised.

The existence of a Shivling inside a disputed structure did not sit well with liberals, Islamists and woke leftists, who felt no qualms in mocking Lord Shiva and insulting the religious beliefs of millions of Hindus in their attempt to undermine the significance of the discovery of a Shivling inside the Gyanvapi mosque.

Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury claims his Twitter account was hacked to share Rajiv Gandhi’s words, files Police complaint

Congress leader Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury on Saturday complained to the Delhi Police that his social media account was hacked in the morning by unidentified people. A tweet was posted from Chowdhury’s account which shared the infamous words of Rajiv Gandhi to justify the Anti-Sikh pogrom of 1984.

In the complaint filed at the South Avenue Police Station, Chowdhury said that unscrupulous, biased content was posted from his Twitter handle when he was busy with the Party Program and was not carrying his mobile phone.

“The content posted smacks of malice and I believe that my Twitter Account had been hacked by some wrongdoers, for the reasons best known to them”, he said on May 21.

On the occasion of the 31st death anniversary of Rajiv Gandhi, Chowdhury’s Twitter account this morning paid tribute to the former PM by sharing his infamous words “when a big tree falls, the ground shakes”, made by him in the wake of the Sikh pogrom that ensued in the aftermath of Indira Gandhi’s assassination in 1984.

The infographic shared on Twitter contained pictures of Rajiv Gandhi and Chaudhury and read “Remembering Rajiv Gandhi on his death anniversary”. The post also contained the contentious comment that was seen as a brazen justification of the horrifying spate of violence unleashed against the Sikhs after two Sikh bodyguards assassinated the then PM Indira Gandhi.

Later, the Congress leader deleted the said infographic and posted a similar picture with the changed quote. This time the quote read, “Development is not about factories, dams, and roads. Development is about people. the goal is material, cultural and spiritual fulfillment for the people. The human factor is of supreme value in development”.

Further, in a series of tweets, the Congress leader also distanced himself from the infographic that quoted Rajiv Gandhi’s infamous comment after the Sikh genocide. “The tweet against my name in the tweeter account has nothing to do with my own observation. A malicious campaign is propagated by forces inimical to me”, Chowdhury tweeted.

Screenshot from Twitter

In the Police complaint, Chowdhury has urged the authorities to take immediate cognizance of the matter and seal the IP address of the unidentified accused. He also has asked the Police to identify the accused and take appropriate action under the cyber law.

Rajiv Gandhi’s infamous comment

On 19th November 1984, while giving a speech in front of thousands of people, then-Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi justified the violence that took place after Indira Gandhi’s assassination. He had said, “Jab bhi koi bada ped girta hai, to dharti thodi hilti hai. (When a big tree falls, the earth shakes.)”

Incidentally, this is not the first time that a Congress handle has shared those words on Twitter. Back in 2016, West Bengal Congress had also shared those words from their official Twitter handle. Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury is also coincidentally from Bengal.

‘It is confidence, not arrogance’: S Jaishankar hits back at Rahul Gandhi for criticising MEA officials for disagreeing with Europeans

Foreign minister S Jaishankar has strongly responded to the comments by Rahul Gandhi in London against the Indian government. The Congress leader had launched an attack on the Modi government at the ‘Ideas for India’ conference in London in the UK, where he had also targeted the Indian bureaucrats.

During his interaction at the event, Rahul Gandhi had said that the several European bureaucrats have told him that Indian foreign service has changed, and they have become arrogant. He said, “I was talking to some bureaucrats from Europe and they said that Indian Foreign Service has completely changed, they don’t listen to anything. They are arrogant. Now they are telling us what orders they are getting, there is no conversation.” Saying that what Indian foreign service officials are doing is wrong, Rahul Gandhi said, “You can’t do that.”

Responding to this statement, union foreign minister S Jaishankar, who is a former Indian foreign service bureaucrat, said that it is not arrogance but confidence that the Indian officials are showing under the Modi government. He accepted that the service has changed, that they are following government orders, and not blindly agreeing with others, as the European officials expect. The union minister also said that by standing their grounds, the foreign service officials are defending national interest.

“Yes, the Indian Foreign Service has changed. Yes, they follow the orders of the Government. Yes, they counter the arguments of others. No, its not called Arrogance. It is called Confidence. And it is called defending National Interest,” S Jaishankar tweeted, posting a video clip of the comments by Rahul Gandhi.

In the backdrop of the Russia-Ukraine war, the west has been unhappy with India over the country’s position on sanctions against Russia. Despite pressures from European countries and the USA, the Modi govt had refused to severe economic ties with Russia, and has not stopped importing oil from the country. India also didn’t vote against Russia several times at the UN, choosing to abstain from vote instead.

While the European nations continue to import gas from Russia, they want Indian to stop buying oil from Russia. And as India has not relented keeping own national interest in mind, the western governments are not happy with the Indian government, and it is clear that some of them told Rahul Gandhi that Indian officials have become arrogant.

But instead of supporting the Indian government in the issue, Rahul Gandhi is supporting the foreign officials. Everyone knows why the Europeans are angry with Indian officials for not toing there line, but still Rahul Gandhi said that what the Indian officials are doing is incorrect and they can’t do this.

Rahul Gandhi compares Ladakh to Ukraine, China to Russia: Is this a ploy to hanker for US interference to destabilise India

Congress leader Rahul Gandhi spoke at the ‘Ideas for India’ conference in the United Kingdom, where he made some contentious statements against his own country India. In response to a question on India’s role in the Russia-Ukraine crisis, Rahul Gandhi replied that Ladakh is to China what Ukraine is to Russia.

Rahul Gandhi asserted that one will have to understand the “parallels.” Saying about the Russian-Ukrainian conflict, Rahul Gandhi said that the issue is because of Russia which has stated to Ukraine that they refuse to accept Ukraine’s territorial integrity.

Decoding the entire conflict in his understanding, Rahul said, “Putin is saying I am not ready for you to have an alliance with the United States so I am going to question your territorial integrity and I am going to attack you. Please recognise the parallels between what is going on in Ukraine and what is going on in Ladakh,” he said, comparing the two.

He said that there are the same ideas at play in both conditions. “There are Chinese forces sitting in Ladakh and there are Chinese forces sitting in Doklam. It is the same principle at work. The Chinese are saying that we do not accept your territoriality and therefore we do not accept your relationship with the United States,” he added.

He said, “My problem is that the government doesn’t allow discussion. Chinese forces are sitting in India today.”

It is worth noting that there have recently been problems in the Ladakh and Doklam regions, but the Indian government has handled the situation effectively. Chinese efforts near the Pangong Tso lake in Ladakh were promptly thwarted by Indian security forces working in tandem with Indian diplomacy. Similarly, the Doklam standoff in Arunachal Pradesh ended after China was pushed to bend on its hostile stance by India.

Rahul Gandhi’s persistent desire for US intervention in India’s politics

Rahul signalled his desire for US intervention two times throughout the discussion. The first one is during the mention of the Russia Ukraine issue and the second one during the mention of human rights violations. Rahul Gandhi has long advocated for foreign meddling in Indian affairs. In April 2021, Rahul similarly sparked anger by requesting American intervention in India’s domestic affairs.

Rahul Gandhi made the remarks during an online conversation with Harvard Kennedy School Ambassador Nicholas Burns. The Harvard Kennedy School’s Institute of Politics asked him to speak on India’s difficulties and prospects, as well as his comments on politics and public service.

TMC leader lied about being Indian, is a Bangladeshi: Read how Court dismissed petition against 2021 election loss, tells EC to take action

A Trinamool Congress (TMC) leader named Alo Rani Sarkar, who contested the 2021 West Bengal State Legislative polls from the Bangaon Dakshin constituency, has turned out to be a Bangladeshi national.

The matter came to light after she moved the Calcutta High Court, challenging the election result and the victory of BJP leader Swapan Majumdar from the said constituency. The petition was heard by Justice Bibek Chaudhuri.

The Court noted that Alo Rani Sarkar was a Bangladeshi national on the date of filing the nomination, election date, and on the date of declaration of result. “From the face of the petitioner’s own document, it is found that the petitioner had no right to contest the assembly election of 2021,” it observed.

“As she is not a citizen of India, she shall not be qualified to be chosen to fill a seat in the legislature of a State in terms of Article 173 of the Constitution read with Section 16 of the Representation of People Act, 1950,” the Court emphasized.

Alo Rani Sarkar contested Vidhan Sabha polls despite her name in Bangladesh’s electoral rolls

The Calcutta High Court observed that the TMC leader was married to a Bangladeshi citizen named Harendra Nath Sarkar in 1980 and stayed with him in the neighboring country for a few years. Following matrimonial discord, she began staying in India permanently.

As per her own affidavit, she submitted an application for cancellation of her name from the electoral roll and National Identity Card (NIC) of Bangladesh on November 5, 2020. However, it was only on June 29, 2021, that the Senior District Election Officer (Barisal) recommended the deletion of Sarkar’s name from the electoral rolls of Bangladesh.

It may be recalled that the TMC leader had filed her nomination from the Bangaon Dakshin constituency on March 31, 2021. The voting was conducted on April 22, 2021, and the results were declared on May 2 of that year.

Thus, she was a Bangladeshi national while filing her nomination or casting her vote during the Vidhan Sabha polls. Given that ‘dual citizenship’ is not valid in India, it means that Alo Rani Sarkar was not an Indian citizen when she contested the polls as a TMC candidate.

TMC leader ‘lied’ about being born in India

In her defense, Alo Rani Sarkar had claimed that her name had appeared erroneously in the voter list of her husband’s native place. However, it came to light that she had ‘voluntarily’ opted for her name to be included in the electoral rolls by submitting her SSC certificate to the authorities.

The TMC leader also alleged that she was born in Baidyabati, in the Hooghly district of West Bengal on 22nd March 1969. She claimed to be an Indian citizen by birth under the Citizenship Act of 1955.

However, she failed to provide any document that could prove that her parents resided in Baidyabati or that she was born in that place. In an inquiry report, the TMC leader had claimed that she is the daughter of Samar Halder and that her ancestors hailed from Necharabad Upazila in the Pirojpur district of Bangladesh.

She also conceded that her brother and mother still live in Necharabad. Sarkar informed during the inquiry that she used to live in the North 24 Parganas district of West Bengal with her uncle.

“It is needless to say that the petitioner has claimed to be a citizen of this country by birth. But from the inquiry report on which she relies in her written objection against the application under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the CPC it is ascertained that her parents used to live in Bangladesh and she came to India with her uncle in her childhood, meaning thereby that the petitioner was born in Bangladesh,” the Court held.

Justice Justice Bibek Chaudhuri also observed discrepancies in the date of birth (DOB) of the TMC leader in Indian and Bangladeshi documents. While her DOB has been mentioned as March 22, 1969, on her Aadhar/ Pan Card, it is listed as January 15, 1967, on her National Identity Card (NIC) issued by Bangladeshi authorities.

Court unsure whether TMC leader is even an Indian citizen

The Court noted discrepancies in her election affidavit and the inquiry report. “It is not clear even on this date as to whether her name has been deleted from the electoral roll of Bangladesh,” it questioned. The Court also added that it was unclear as to how she became an Indian citizen.

“The petitioner has not claimed acquisition of citizenship under Section 3 or 4 of the Citizenship Act, 1955. She has not acquired citizenship by registration under Section 5 of the Citizenship Act of 1955,” it said.

“The petitioner also does not fall within the purview of the Citizenship (Amendment) Act, 2019. Therefore, even if the petitioner has a voter identity card, Aadhar card, and passport, the said documents do not prove her citizenship of this country,” the Calcutta High Court ruled.

It added, “The petitioner never acquired citizenship of this country following the provisions of the Citizenship Act, 1955. On the contrary, the admitted position is that the petitioner was a Bangladeshi citizen on the date of declaration of General Election of West Bengal State Assembly by the Election Commission, filing of the nomination paper, date of the election, and declaration of the result.”