Home Blog Page 6364

From sewage worm, Gangu Teli to mad dog and rabies stricken monkey: PM Modi recounts the abuses hurled at him by Congress

Prime Minister Modi, while addressing an election rally in Kurukshetra, Haryana, recalled the abuses hurled at him by the various opposition leaders. He said that such abuses are hurled at him by the Congress Party and its allies because he stopped corruption and also exposed their nepotism.

The Prime Minister recounted all sorts of derogatory terms that have been used by the opposition leaders against him like sewage worm, Gangu Teli, Mad dog, Bhasmasur, Virus and even Dawood Ibrahim.


Reciting the list of abuses he said that he had also been compared with Hitler, called a worthless son, rabies stricken monkey, mouse, and Lahu (Blood) Purush. He said that Congress even called him Ravana, Scorpion, filthy man, and also one who does the farming of poison.


The list did not end there and the Prime Minister counted more abuses including the infamous ‘trader of death‘ jibe by former Congress Sonia Gandhi, mentally ill, lowlife, and a comment by a Congress leader questioning who his father was.


Listing down all the abuses, Modi said that the opposition leaders are exposing their dictionary of love and yet no one is questioning them.


Modi said that despite such attacks by the opposition he was still serving the country with all his strength and that Haryana is a witness to it.

She accepts Pakistan’s PM but not India’s PM, Narendra Modi hits back at Mamata’s ‘not my PM’ remark

Prime Minister strongly reacted to the non-stop criticism and abuses that he has been receiving from opposition leaders, particularly West Bengal CM Mamata Banerjee. He also talked about the increase in abuse and criticism that he is facing from opposition parties.

Talking to Times Now, when asked about the difference in the Lok Sabha elections of 2014 and 2019, Modi said that his digestion power has increased in these five years. Elaborating, he said that before 2014, he had to face criticism only from political leaders in Gujarat and few leaders from Delhi. But now, he is forced to prepare for digesting all kinds of false allegations, dirty abuses that he receives from all over the country.


In the context of abuses, when the reporter asked about Mamata Banerjee saying that she does not consider Narendra Modi as her PM, Modi said that the West Bengal CM is disrespecting the mandate given by the voters of the country. Last week when it was reported that Mamata Banerjee did not receive two phone calls made by the PM to talk about cyclone Fani, the TMC leader had said that she does not consider Modi to be her PM, and she will talk to a new Prime Minister after 23rd May, when the results of the ongoing Lok Sabha elections will be declared.

The PM also said that after the incidents of Pulwama and Balakot, she had addressed the Pakistan PM as the prime minister. She accepts the PM of Pakistan, but does not accept the PM of India. So now the voter of Bengal and India will decide whether such people respect the Indian constitution and the mandate of people, or whether they are capable of respecting the same. People in the country will decide whether these people are eligible for the democracy, the prime minister said.

When asked about how he would like to respond to Priyanka Gandhi comparing him with Duryodhan and saying that he has high ego, Modi said that he would like to respond by keeping silent. He said he will not react to Priyanka Gandhi’s attack and remain silent.


Reacting to Congress criticism that Modi broke tradition and culture by attacking Rajiv Gandhi who is no more, the PM said that Congress party has been abusing dead persons for a long time. He said that a Congress minister, who is a guru of the namdar, had removed and kicked out the nameplate of Veer Savarkar from the Cellular in Andaman. He also gave the example of how persons like Shyama Prasad Mukherjee, Manohar Parikar etc persons are being abused by Congress leaders.

When asked how China finally agreed to declare Masood Azhar as a global terrorist, the PM said that India has become successful in convincing the world about India’s point of view regarding terrorism.

The anatomy of a d*ck pic: Why its politicization ought to concern us more than politicization of Surgical Strikes

Not so long ago, people on Twitter were shocked, bemused, angry and disgusted, all at the same time, when they were greeted by an image of circumcised male genitalia on their Twitter feed thanks to ’eminent journalist’ Barkha Dutt. Now that the storm over it has died down, it is perhaps time to analyse the events and phenomena surrounding it.

When Barkha Dutt shared the d*ck pick, what amused, annoyed and angered people in equal measure was the fact that Barkha somehow blamed it on nationalism. According to her, the obscene picture was sent to her in the name of nationalism. There was absolutely nothing in the image, which contained only the male organ, to remotely suggest that it had anything to do with nationalism at all. However, Barkha, in her infinite wisdom, did not appear to hesitate to link it to the ‘ism’ she appears to have the most disdain for.

People have put that whole morbid episode behind them by now. However, there is a deeper issue at hand here. We ought to ask ourselves here if the political climate of the country is such that people are willing to politicize a d*ck pick, what else would they be willing to politicize? We ought to ask ourselves, how did we end up in a situation where people are willing to politicize a d*ck pic, a bloody d*ck pic of all things.

When we look back, we will find that d*ck pics are only the latest in a long list of things that have been politicized which, on the face of it, have nothing to do with politics at all. If we look at society, Friendships, Romance, entertainment, every facet of our lives has been scarred by politics. And it has been a gradual progression, matters escalating with every passing day.

Initially, it began with how we evaluated public policy. How many times have we found ourselves defending a policy merely because the politicians we prefer were backing it? How often have we found ourselves obsessively critiquing a policy decision merely because it was proposed by a political entity we are averse to?

Things have reached a point where we cannot evaluate the policy on its own merit. The debates around any policy are tainted with political partisanship. I want to be clear, I am not pointing my fingers at any particular political faction here. Fueling political partisanship is not the objective of this article. Again, I want to ask my readers, how did we get here?

In a previous article, I had elaborated on the fundamental flaws of Democracy. In this article, again, I argue that the politicization of every single aspect of our lives is the inevitable consequence of democracy. Democratic politics thrives on dividing people along various lines. Thus far, Indians, and primarily Hindus, have been divided along the lines of caste, class, creed, region, language and even food choices. Now, due to various aspects of modernity, numerous factors are being added into the equation.

Let me add a clarification here. Barkha Dutt is not the first person to politicize the phallus. Feminism, at its very core, is politics over genitalia. Nor is Barkha Dutt the first person to associate penises with nationalism. Academics in the West have long argued for the intimate links between Toxic Masculinity and Nationalism. However, the now infamous alleged journalist quite probably has earned herself the distinction of being the first person to associate d*ck pics with Nationalism. In many ways, it’s even worse than the ‘All Men Are Trash’ narrative.

It will be hard for any of us to imagine a single aspect of our life that has not been politicized. Even prostitutes have ended up being victims of this highly politicized climate. Under normal circumstances, prostitutes are the last people who could be expected to be affected by politics. But such are the times we live in. The incident I am referring to happened in the United States when ‘Incels’ (Involuntary Celibates), that is, people who cannot ‘get laid’ in colloquial terms despite having the desire to went after ‘Online Thots’ who earned money by engaging in nudity and sexually provocative behaviour online. The allegations were that these ‘Thots’ were not paying taxes and the organized campaign against them was called #ThotPatrol.

Therefore, it’s quite amusing when people bemoan the politicization of national security and military operations like Surgical Strikes. We are quite obviously missing the forest for the trees here. These events are meant to be politicized and their politicization ought not to concern us too much. However, we aren’t paying sufficient attention to politicization of things which really ought to concern us.

Take, for instance, the politicization of sexual assault and harassment allegations. Certain quarters have attempted to use such allegations to achieve political ends. Take the events during the US Presidential Elections, people believed them or discarded them based on their political inclinations. Not many people bothered to actually evaluate the evidence at hand and make informed decisions. The overwhelming majority of people made their decision based on their political opinions. If we permit politics to determine our assessment of sexual assault allegations, then surely, we have hit the bottom of the pit.

Entire fields of Academia have been hijacked and subverted by political dogma. Mental health professions are dubbing people mentally unfit for public office without performing any psychological tests on the individuals concerned. Efforts are also underway to classify an entire brand of political opinion as a symptom of underlying psychological issues. These are things which ought to concern us all.

Entertainment is one aspect of life that has perhaps been most affected. Movie reviewers now blame people of a particular political dispensation for a movie they enjoyed getting bad reviews from people. Celebrities have imposed themselves on political discourse. More than that, an increasing number of movies are getting released across the world which is blatant propaganda aimed at politicizing issues that ought not to be politicized.

The most devastating impact on society, however, has been the politicization of gender and biological sex. For thousands of years of human civilization, it has been a known and accepted fact that there are only two genders. Scientifically speaking, it’s still accepted that there are only two genders. However, we have an entire brand of politics, which has complete acceptance across Western Europe and among one of the two major parties in the United States and the largest opposition party in India, that is based on the negation of a property as fundamental as biological sex.

The consequence of the above brand of politics has been permitting hormone blockers for children as young as 7 years old to prevent the normal development of puberty based on subjective feelings of the child at the time. It is ruining the lives of little children. Another consequence of it has been the regular efforts at normalization of paedophilia, perhaps the most heinous crime imaginable.

Public Health hasn’t been left untouched either. ‘Body Positivity’ is apparently a movement now. On the face of it, there appears to be nothing wrong with urging people to feel comfortable in their own skin. However, in its disguise, morbid obesity is being normalized and should you disagree with it, you shall be labelled a ‘fat-phobic misogynistic pig’ or worse. Fat Acceptance is actually a huge movement in the West. Could we imagine any other political setup under which people would be politicizing obesity and politicking for its normalization?

If people believe obesity is the most unimaginable thing to have been politicized, well, you may be in for a surprise. Great political battles have been fought in recent times over Body Hair and gender-specific toilets. Air conditioning and subjects like Mathematics and Grammar have been politicized as well. The Gods up there surely have a very weird sense of humour.

Thus, more than the politicization of national security or military operations, these are the things which ought to concern us all. The politicization of a d*ck pick was but only the natural culmination of a series of events and we have not reached the end of the road when it comes to politicizing matters. Only the Gods know the things which will be politicized in the next 10 years.

As bad as things are in India, the situation in the United States is even worse. People have divorced, broken up, cut off their friends and family over their personal preferences in the Presidential Elections in 2016. These are not exaggerations, these things have actually happened.

When we think of Democracy, we imagine it to be the manifestation of the highest human ideals. We imagine great intellectual debates over public policy and related matters. We imagine the victory of human rights and individual liberty. In reality, however, there are booth captures and people killing each other mindlessly over political differences. We have state governments refusing to cooperate with the central government for mere politics. We have endless chaos and division of society along multiple identitarian lines. And eventually, the anticipation of the manifestation of the highest form of human ingenuity devolves into politics over obesity, body hair, genitalia and who gets to enter which toilets.

Therefore, all of us need to take a deep breath and introspect on the course we have set ourselves upon. Currently, it’s a runaway train and we have no idea how to get off it. We need to set our differences aside, everyone across all sections of the political spectrum, and deliberate upon the measures we could take to avoid what appears to be a pending unmitigated disaster. We are on a highway to hell and the only way this ends is in a catastrophe.

Karni Sena threatens Javed Akhtar over his remark equating Ghoonghat with Burqa, demands apology

Rajasthan based fringe group Karni Sena, miffed with Javed Akhtar’s recent remarks on the practice of ‘Ghoonghat'(veil) in Rajasthan have threated the veteran lyricist with dire consequences if he doesn’t issue an apology on his comments on the same.

Jivan Singh Solanki, president of the Maharashtra wing of the Karni Sena, was quoted as saying, “The burqa is associated with terrorism and (is a question of) national security. We have asked Akhtar to render an apology within three days or face the consequences.”

In a video recording, Solanki says, “We will gouge out your eyes and pull out your tongue if you don’t apologise. We will enter your house and beat you.”

This warning is a chain reaction following Javed Akhtar‘ remark at an event in Bhopal, where he stated, “If you want to bring a law banning burqa here and if it is someone’s view I have no objection. But before the last phase of election in Rajasthan, this government should announce a ban on the practice of Ghoonghat in that state. I feel that Ghoonghat should go and the burqa should go. I will be happy.”

The lyricist had stirred up an honest’s nest with his comment to ban ‘Ghoonghat’ too if ‘burqa’ is being outlawed by the government. This remark had come in the backdrop of Shiv Sena mouthpiece, Saamna asking the government to follow the Sri Lankan government order, banning burqa for national security.

The Sri Lankan government had banned the burqa, amongst all other means of covering the face, ensuring public safety, in the aftermath of the dastardly Easter Sunday blast which killed more than 250 people and left the island nation devastated.

Later, Akhtar attempted to clarify his stand on the issue.


It is notable here that the Karni Sena had gained national attention during the row regarding the release of Sanjay Leela Bhansali’s movie Padmaavat. The fringe group had also threatened violence against Bhansali and the movie’s lead actress Deepika Padukone.

Indian Air Force likely to buy ‘bunker-buster’ version of the Spice-2000 bomb used in Balakot strikes

The Indian Air Force (IAF) is planning to buy advanced ‘bunker-buster’ version of Spice-2000 bombs, which can completely destroy buildings and bunkers. The Spice-2000 bombs were successfully used against the Jaish-e-Mohammed terror camps in Balakot, Pakistan.

During the Balakot strikes, a pack of 12 Mirage 2000 fighter aircraft flew across the Line of Control and dropped the Spice-2000 bombs hitting the Jaish facility in the Khyber Pakhtunwa province.

The Spice-2000 bombs used in Balakot strikes were of the penetrator version which does not destroy the buildings. The guided bomb enters the target building by making a hole on the roof, followed by an explosion within the building to kill enemies with the mix of 70-80 kg explosives with shrapnel.

“The IAF is now planning to acquire the bunker buster or the building destroyer version with Mark 84 warhead which can decimate targeted buildings,” said government sources.

The three armed services have been granted emergency powers to acquire equipment of their choice worth up to Rs 300 crore to prepare for any hostilities. The Spice-2000 bomb is likely to be acquired by these emergency powers.

The Army has already planned to acquire Spike anti-tank guided missiles to be deployed against any possible armoured threat posed by the enemy troops.

The Spice-2000 bombs are supplied by Israel which is a key weapon and ammunition supplier for the IAF.

The bombs are manufactured by Israel’s Rafael Advanced Defence Systems. Each Spice-2000 is approximately a 1000 kg air to ground bomb that can be launched from a distance of 100 km. It has also been reported that IAF would also be equipping Sukhoi-Su 30MKI combat aircraft with the Spice bombs. In a dossier submitted by the IAF to the government, it has been proved that during the Balakot 80% of the bombs had hit the target.

I am a Bengali ‘Jai Shri Ram wala’, and I am offended at Pritish Nandy’s disdainful attempt to divide Hindus in the name of Gods

After dividing Hindus along the lines of caste, class, creed, region and language, it appears attempts are underway to divide Hindus along the lines of the Gods we worship. ‘Eminent journalist’ Pritish Nandy took to Twitter today to vent his frustration towards ‘Jai Shri Ram walas’.


First things first, it’s really annoying when you have people of a particular political dispensation claiming to speak for an entire community, especially when the individual concerned is a bald idiot.

It’s not too difficult to see what Nandy is trying to do here. It’s quite a sneaky attempt to pit Bengalis against Hindus from other regions of the country on the basis of the Gods we worship. Of course, the probability of him succeeding in his endeavour is a thousand times less than that of Rahul Gandhi becoming the Prime Minister in 2019, but that’s beside the point.

The reason why Nandy makes no sense is that for Hindus, the Multiplicity of the Divine is not a mere platitude but words we live by every single day. We are polytheists, we believe in the plurality of Gods and we worship Them all. Nandy gives the impression that Hindus worship Maa Saraswati and Durga but not Shri Rama. That’s quite evidently false. Rama has as many devotees among Bengal as any other Hindu community.

The disdain with which Nandy refers to devotees of Shri Rama is infuriating. Because I am a Bengali and I am very much one of those ‘Jai Shri Ram walas’ that he speaks so lowly of. To give people a hint of how popular Shri Rama is among Bengalis, there is a popular four-line rhyme that is taught to children who are afraid of ghosts. It was taught to me as well when I was a kid. It goes, “Bhoot amar poot, Petni amar jhee, Ram Laxman shaatey aachhey, korbey aamay ki?” It roughly means, “Rama and Laxman are with me, what could ghosts ever do to harm me?”

To give further context to the intimate relationship that Bengalis share with Shri Rama, the Krittivasi Ramayana, a rendition of the Ramayana in Bengali, was composed by the famed Bengali poet Krittibas Ojha in the 15th century. Then there is a neighbourhood in Howrah, Ramrajatala, where the residents conduct a three months long worship dedicated to Shri Rama and Sita Mata every year at the local Ram Mandir. The tradition dates back centuries. There are numerous Ram Mandirs in Bengal as well. More significantly, Hanuman has always been immensely popular in Bengal. Where there is Hanuman, could his Lord ever be absent?

Nandy also gives the impression here that it’s only the Feminine forms of the sacred that we worship. It’s quite evidently false. Narayan is still worshipped, Hanuman is immensely popular among Bengalis. Ganesha is worshipped as well and so is Shri Krishna. Mahadeva creates quite the fervour among Bengalis too. Therefore, the impression that Bengalis only worship Goddesses is demonstrably false. We are Hindus, We worship Gods in their many forms.

There’s also an arrogant insinuation in the tweets that people who raise slogans of ‘Jai Shri Ram’ do not worship Goddesses and don’t respect women. Again, it’s a false assertion. Narendra Modi, a ‘Jai Shri Ram wala’ himself, is an ardent devotee of Maa Bagalamukhi. Navratri is celebrated with great fervour by ‘Jai Shri Ram walas’.

To give a hint of the invisible threads of Dharma that bind our country together, Maa Bagalamukhi is one of the Dasa-Mahavidya, the ten aspects of Adi-Parashakti and a form of Maa Parvati. In Tripura, Bengalis and the resident tribal communities, worship with great devotion Maa Tripura Sundari, another manifestation of Shakti, at the Temple known locally as Matabari.

Then, we have Maa Kali and Maa Tara, extremely popular among Bengalis, who are aspects of Shakti as well. There is Maa Chinnamasta, Bhairavi, Bhuvaneshwari, Dhumavati and others who are worshipped all across India by every single community. There are Temples dedicated to all the Goddesses across the lengths and breadths of India. Therefore, to make the assertion that Bengalis are somehow different from ‘Jai Shri Ram walas’ because we worship Goddesses is mental retardation of the highest order.

To give further context, Yogi Adityanath, the Peethadhish of the Gorakhnath Mandir in Uttar Pradesh, is a revered Monk of the Nath Sampradaya. There is a huge number of followers of his sect among Bengalis in Tripura where he is widely revered due to the association. Thus, only a fool or a clown would attempt to insinuate that the Bengali community has fallen from the skies without having many commonalities with our fellow Indians.

As for ‘Jai Shri Ram walas’, too, the traditional slogan is, of course, ‘Jai Siya Ram’ where the name of Sita Mata is taken before Prabhu Rama. Another popular slogan is ‘Siyavar Ramachandra ki Jai!’ Again, Shri Rama is referred to as the Husband of Sita Mata. Therefore, to claim that people who raise chants to Jai Shri Ram do not worship Goddesses is plainly false.

More importantly, where there is Shri Rama, there will be Sita Mata. They cannot ever be viewed in isolation. Their destinies, their fate, their lives were forever entwined with each other. The Gods themselves cannot separate them, we are mere mortals. Therefore, unless Shri Rama is depicted in his warrior aspect, Sita Mata is always by His side along with Laxman. And when we eventually build the Bhavya Ram Mandir at Rama Janmabhoomi, Sita Mata will reside there as well and will be worshipped because we hold her in regard just as high as we do Rama.

The elitist disdain that people like Nandy hold for North Indians and Gujaratis and Marathis is quite obnoxious. Will Nandy ever accuse the Abrahamic of not respecting women because they worship a male god? Of course, he won’t. Because he is a hypocrite.

As a ‘Jai Shri Ram wala’ myself, however, I have much more in common with fellow Hindus regardless of their community than I could ever have with liberals like Nandy. I am much more comfortable in the company of South Indians, North Indians, Odiyas, Delhiites and others who worship the same Gods that I do than I would ever be in the company of liberals. The crux of the matter is, Bengalis, like people from every other community, may be different on the outside but the core of the matter, our beliefs are just the same.

I can agree with Nandy on the point that the slogan ‘Jai Shri Ram’ has become politicized. But that is because Hinduism is currently facing an existential threat from political forces. Under such circumstances, it’s natural for Hindus to rely on our Gods to see us through. What actually frustrates Nandy is the fact that ‘Jai Shri Ram’ has become Bengal’s ‘Bidrohor Chitkar’ (Cry of Protest) amidst a saffron surge in the state.

It could very well have been ‘Joy Maa Tara’ or ‘Joy Maa Kali’ instead, however, Shri Rama has become a symbol of political solidarity cutting across every fissure within Hindu society. Therefore, we chant ‘Jai Shri Ram’. But Nandy need not worry, Bengalis have nothing to worry about. Because we do not worship jealous Gods.

FIR registered after a bunch of people chanted ‘Modi, Modi’ at Digvijaya Singh’s roadshow

In a major embarrassment to Congress, during senior Congress leader Digvijaya Singh’s roadshow in Bhopal, pro-Modi slogans were raised by the people.

According to Madhya Pradesh Police’s DIG Irshad Wali, if a rally is passing by and if anyone tries to create a ruckus, they would take action against them.

An FIR has now been registered against a group of people for chanting ‘Modi, Modi’ at the roadshow. According to News18, the police has claimed that Digvijaya Singh and Computer Baba had a permission for the rally, but the group which was standing there chanting pro-Modi slogans did not have the permission and hence that could be considered violation.

As per Republic TV, at least twice Digvijaya Singh’s supporters came across people who chanted pro-Modi slogans against Singh. Meanwhile, the BJP has alleged that posters of Sadhvi Pragya and Amit Shah have been taken down by the Nagar Nigam for the roadshow.

Rabri Devi calls PM Modi a ‘Jallad’, says PM has got judges and journalists murdered

Former Bihar CM and wife of fodder scam convict Lalu Yadav has joined the club of opposition leaders who resort to hurling derogatory personal statements and abuses on PM Modi. Rabri Devi has called PM Modi a ‘Jallad’ (Executioner)


Speaking in the reference of Congress Uttar Pradesh General Secretary Priyanka Gandhi calling PM Modi ‘Duryodhan’, Rabri Devi said that he shouldn’t be called ‘Duryodhan’, instead he should be called a ‘Jallad’. Rabri made unsubstantiated allegations against PM Modi, claiming that he has got judges and journalists killed. She also added that the PM has a brutal and heinous mind.

Earlier, taking political discourse to another low, Priyanka Gandhi in an election rally had likened PM Modi to Duryodhan, the main villain in Mahabharata and warned him that his ‘arrogance’ will take him down. Her brother and Congress party chief Rahul Gandhi have been regularly levelling baseless allegations against PM Modi. He had recently lied that PM Modi has legislated a law allowing gunning down of Tribals. Congress has also been attacking the PM with a derogatory ‘Chowkidar Chor Hai’ slogan this election.

There have been concerted attempts made by the opposition leaders to cast a dent in popularity enjoyed by PM Modi among the masses. From casteist slurs to chor barbs, the opposition has been ruthless in attacking the BJP leaders, in particular, the Prime Minister. The desperation to somehow remove PM Modi and BJP from the power is palpable as seemingly disparate political parties have come together to form unholy alliances to take on the might of the BJP.

Derogatory remarks and abuses are something the Lalu Yadav clan is quite apt at. Apart from Lalu Yadav’s conviction, the family is facing multiple probes on corruption and many of their properties have been seized by central agencies investigating the corruption cases. Rabri Devi had earlier made violent threats against PM Modi. She had stated that many in her state are ready to slit the PM’s throat and chop off his hands. He son Tej Pratap Yadav had stated once that he will skin the prime minister alive.

Big Tech is watching you: Dear TrueIndology, you never existed

In an ideal world, in an ideal democracy, every voice would be heard equally. Of course, that has never quite been true in practice. Do you think you have the best ideas and want to lead the nation? Good luck forming your own party, getting enough people to hear your message, winning 272 seats in the Lok Sabha and becoming Prime Minister.

In practice, therefore, only a few voices are ever heard. Because even managing to get a handful of people to listen to you is a big deal. Anybody who has ever started a business will tell you how hard it gets the public to even know about your product.

Generally speaking, the media is your gateway to reaching people. As a thumb rule, the gatekeepers will only let you in if you are well known enough to get people to listen. Yes, it’s a vicious circle. Which is why so few make it through.

But there is a second factor. It did not take long for the gatekeepers in the media to figure out that they had tremendous power and could choose to let through only those voices that they liked. In this way, the media could indirectly control the whole nation.

Which is why the social media revolution was such a huge deal. Suddenly, every citizen had a mouthpiece and the old gatekeepers were irrelevant. Worse, the gatekeepers realized they were being watched by the keen eyes of social media. The entry barrier into the marketplace of ideas had been lowered. On this more level playing field, the old privilege was proving useless.

Of course, the tech companies who invented this new space were thrilled. A new frontier had been created. People could make themselves heard like never before.

It was too good to last.

History has a way of repeating itself. Once the old privilege class had been humbled, an all-new privilege class rose up. Big Tech realized they were now the gatekeepers and could do whatever they wanted.

Once the internet decisively won the war with newspapers and old style TV news, a curious thing happened. The old privilege class decided to end its adversarial relationship with social media and big tech and started lobbying with them instead. Like princely states who recognized the paramountcy of the British Raj.

The following picture is completely unrelated to everything else in this article. I am just randomly putting it here.

Untitled.png

Most people who are active on social media will know about the recent plight of TrueIndology, an anonymous Twitter handle dedicated to exposing left-wing distortions of Indian history.

Given its huge following, True Indology had become too much of a threat to gatekeepers in the social sciences. And the old privilege class, now embedded as henchmen of the new privileged class, wanted her/him out. And of course, they got their way.

The excuse was essentially the same as that which gatekeepers have used to justify their power throughout the ages. In the middle ages, the Church would protect the ‘immortal souls’ of people from being captured by the Devil. In the 1800s and 1900s, there was the “white man’s burden” to raise the “lesser races” to civilization. The British claimed to hold India “in trust”, supposedly protecting us from tearing each other apart owing to our many differences. Now Big Tech is here to protect us from “abuse”. They don’t want anything for themselves, they are just happy to make sure that supposed “weaker sections” are not crushed by those with more social privilege. You know, exactly like the British.

Those who followed True Indology and even those who despised him will be hard pressed to give a single example of the handle putting out “abuse”. Even so, there was bound to be something in Twitter terms of service (which nobody reads) that could be used to turf her/him out.

What is interesting, however, is what’s okay on Twitter.

Untitled.png

Indians described as piglets, swine, cockroaches and rodents?

Some folks who reported this tweet claim to have received replies from Twitter stating that referring to Indians as piglets, swine, cockroaches and rodents is not against Twitter rules.

Excellent.

There is a common counterpoint made in such situations that can be easily dealt with. As a private corporation, Twitter is entitled to set its terms of service and indeed its whims. Such a view misses the point that Big Tech functions as a bank for personal data and profits from it, not very different from a bank where you deposit your savings. Would people react similarly if banks functioned in a completely unregulated manner? It is just that the general public is yet to realize that personal data is worth big money. Social media isn’t “free”.

Censorship has existed in every age. The powerful have always tried to impose their worldview on the powerless. But with the rise of Big Tech, something completely new is unfolding in the field of censorship.

In the old days, the oppressor would create a spectacle of punishing their victim. While the victim suffered terribly, ironically, the oppressor would also pay a price, perhaps without realizing it. The spectacle of censorship would create sympathy, keep influencing public opinion until it reached a tipping point. This is why the censors of old never quite managed to kill ideas. Censorship never paid off in the long run. For anybody.

Enter Big Tech. An idea can spread around the world in less than a second. It follows that an idea can also be suppressed almost as soon as it is created. And without anyone even realizing it. As technology takes over all the channels of communication, for the first time in history, somebody has the power to kill ideas. Humanity has not dealt with any such thing before.

Think about how perverse a shadowban is. You create an idea and you think it’s out there. Except it’s not. It’s disappeared. Chilling. In times of oppression, dissenters would invent creative ways to get their message out. But what if the messages simply disappeared into nowhere? An algorithm wipes it out the moment it pops into your head. No visible evidence is left that the idea even existed.

In Nineteen Eighty-Four, Orwell calls it “reality control”. And those who cease to exist are called “unpersons”.

George Orwell wrote that who controls the past also controls the future. True Indology tried to dig up the past so that people who could stand up against those who control the future. Sorry, True Indology, but you have become an “unperson”. You never existed.

Because Big Tech is watching you.

Digvijay Singh resorts to lies and deception to show how Hindu votes favour him instead of Sadhvi Pragya in Bhopal

Senior Congress leader Digvijay Singh is seemingly having a tough time dealing with the candidature of Sadhvi Pragya. The Sadhvi who unwittingly became a pawn in Congress’ petty games while the party tried to concoct the ‘saffron terror’ bogey and languished in prison for a little short of a decade has been fielded against Digvijay Singh in Bhopal, the very man who was instrumental in building the theory of ‘saffron terror’.

Digvijay Singh is the same individual who was present at the launch of the book 26/11-RSS ki Saazish. The book basically insinuated that the Mumbai terror attack by Lashkar-e-Tayyaba was a conspiracy by RSS. He was also, according to former bureaucrat from the Congress government, closely and intimately involved in the careful construction of the lie of ‘saffron terror’.

His utterances have often cost the Congress party dearly and now, with the victim of Congress’ sadism and the man who was involved in the conspiracy have come face to face electorally.

Many have speculated that the Hindu vote in Bhopal might just gravitate towards Sadhvi Pragya en masse. In such a situation, if those predictions are in fact accurate, Digvijay Singh might just face a tough battle.

To that end, Digvijay is now resorting to flat-out lies and deception to give an impression that the Hindu votes are favouring him despite Sadhvi Pragya being his opponent.

Congress leader Digvijay Singh performed a Yagna in Bhopal where several Sadhus were invited. A Hath Yoga was conducted by Computer Baba, seeking success for Digvijay Singh in the Lok Sabha elections. But now the Sadhus who were present in the ritual have revealed that they had nothing to do with the Congress election campaign, and they did not know that the program was organised for political purposes.

At this puja, Computer Baba went on a tirade against the BJP. However, the Sadhus present at the puja who were being touted by Congress as being ‘anti-BJP’ said they had no idea what the puja was for before they got to the event. They said that after coming to the venue they got to know that they have to speak for the Congress party and ensure the victory of Digvijay Singh.

Essentially, the babas were duped. One of the Sadhus said, “We are here because Computer Baba has asked us to be here. We live a life of hermits. We are not here for campaigning for any party. It doesn’t bother us who wins the elections, we will only vote for those who work for us.”

Another Sadhu said, “We are here for Computer Baba. We are not aware of the other things happening here. We are not here for campaigning.”

Now, another incident has come to light that shows how shrewdly Congress is trying to dupe people into believing that the Hindu vote favours Digvijay Singh in Bhopal.

Police personnel in civil clothes were made to wear saffron scarves at Digvijay Singh’s roadshow event.


Saffron, the colour of Hinduism and Hindutva, would certainly give the impression that the Hindu vote in Bhopal favours Digvijay. The truth, however, that was revealed later was that they were police personnel who were “made to wear this”.

Digvijay Singh is trying his best to dupe, deceive and even lie to put up a show. A picture that might make people believe that the Hindu vote is with him and not the Sadhvi who was tortured, imprisoned and falsely implicated by the Congress government to create the ‘saffron terror’ narrative. Whether this illusion works in Digvijay Singh’s favour remains to be seen.