Home Blog Page 5560

IIT Kanpur student who had chanted controversial poem ‘Bas Naam Rahega Allah Ka’ during anti-CAA protests expresses remorse for ‘hurting sentiments’

0

As the protests surrounding the new Citizenship Amendment Act peters out, those accused of fomenting trouble appear to be making amends for the wrongs that they did during the peak of the anti-CAA demonstrations. In one such incident, a third-year student from the prestigious Indian Institute, Kanpur, whose public recital of controversial poem prompted a faculty member to file a complaint against him, has apologised and expressed his regrets to the institute for “hurting sentiments” through his “error in judgment”.

In December 2019, during the anti-CAA protests in Kanpur, the controversial couplet penned by Faiz Ahmed Faiz was recited by students on the college campus. A complaint was then lodged by a faculty of the Institute, Dr Vashi Sharma, according to whom the poem recited by the students had contained clarion calls to “destroy all idols” while emphasising that everything will vanish except for Allah’s name.

In the video of the incident, according to Sharma, lines from ‘ Hum Dekhenge ’ was recited along with placards reading, “tumhari laathi aur goli se tez hamari awaaz hai” (our voice is louder than your sticks and bullets).

The poem read, “Lazim hai ke hum bhi dekhenge. Jab arz-e-Khuda ke kaabe se. Sab but uthwae jaenge. Hum ahl-e-safa mardood-e-harm. Masnad pe bethae jaenge. Sab taaj uchale jaenge. Sab takht girae jaenge. Bas naam rahega Allah ka. Hum dekhenge.”

The lines used from the poem appear deeply communal in isolation and are often used by Pakistani-sponsored terrorists and separatists in Kashmir to express their anti-Hindu and anti-India hatred. The ones raising these slogans essentially wanted that all the idols, crowns will be vanished to keep Allah’s name alive.

Soon after Swarajya exclusively reported about Dr Sharma’s complaint, the Institute had established a six-member committee to investigate if any student or faculty member had used “inflammatory, abusive and intimidating language” during the event or on social media after Dr Sharma registered her complaint against the students.

After investigating the matter, a report was submitted to the Institute director last week by the committee. The report lists down 5 teachers and 6 students for their “less-than-desirable” conduct. The committee has advised the director to provide “guidance” to them.

Regarding the recital of the problematic poem, the deputy director of IIT Kanpur, Manindra Agarwal said that the student who chanted the poem is remorseful of his actions. “We asked him if he believes he was right in reciting the poem at the communally charged up environment. He said he did not intend to hurt anybody’s sentiments but if in case he has offended anyone’s feelings, he is apologetic about it,” Agarwal said to Swati Goel Sharma of Swarajya.

While Agarwal refused to disclose the identities of the people named in the report, he added that the committee considers the matter to be closed.

In contrast to some misleading media reports which said the committee formed by the Institute is tasked with studying if the poem was “anti-Hindu”, Agarwal rubbished such media canards saying the committee was never instructed to analyse the content and the meaning of the poem. “We were simply asked to investigate why tempers ran high and who was accountable for it,” he had added.

Apropos of the recommended counselling, Agarwal said that the counselling may not have happened owing to the campus lockdown amidst the coronavirus scare. The institute has closed down for two weeks and the students and other members have been advised to mot come to campus in case they are on vacation.

UP government starts recovering costs of damaged property during Anti-CAA riots, six rioters already paid the first instalment

Yogi Adityanath led Uttar Pradesh government has started recovering money from the rioters who indulged in the vandalism and desecration of public properties during the anti-CAA riots in the month of December despite consistent warnings by the government.

Reportedly, six rioters have already paid their first instalments with a total amount of ₹80,856 in UP’s Kanpur. The property desecrated by the rioters which have to paid by the 21 rioters in Kanpur was worth a total of ₹2,80,000 for which the rioters were warned to pay the amount for the damaged property on time otherwise strict action will be against them.

UP CM Yogi Adityanath has been very clear about his intentions from the very first day when the riots took place in the state of Uttar Pradesh. He had warned rioters that taking the law into their hands, indulging in arson can land them into trouble.

Earlier this month the UP government had put hoardings of 57 anti-CAA vandals in prominent intersections in state capital Lucknow. The hoardings included their names, addresses, and photos of the violent protesters who damaged public property during the riots that claimed 22 lives in December last year. The rioters were asked to pay the penalty amount within a month.

The vandals have been identified through police reports and other sources. The UP government is looking forward to recovering more than 1.5 Cr from 57 reported rioters across the state of Uttar Pradesh who indulged in vandalism, violence, and arson in the name of anti-CAA protests.

The Uttar Pradesh government has also promulgated the Uttar Pradesh Recovery of Damages to Public and Private Property Ordinance, 2020 to recover damages from rioters. The Ordinance states that the state will set up claims tribunals to investigate the damages caused during protests and to award compensation, and also to cover the cost of action taken by police and administration for prevention of damage to public properties.

Pakistan PM Imran Khan uses Coronavirus outbreak to whine about the economic crisis back home, seeks debt waiver for his ‘vulnerable’ country

0

The Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan has urged the international community to consider for a debt waiver for poor and vulnerable countries like his. During the interview with The Associated Press, Khan claimed that the coronavirus will devastate the economies of developing nations, and as a result, richer economies must write off the debts of the world’s poorer countries which includes Pakistan.

“My worry is poverty and hunger,” Khan said. “The world community has to think of some sort of a debt write-off for countries like us, which are very vulnerable, at least that will help us in coping with (the coronavirus).”

Using the Novel Coronavirus outbreak as an excuse, the Pakistan PM whined that if a serious outbreak happens in Pakistan, he’s worried that his government’s efforts to lift the ailing economy out of near-collapse would begin an unstoppable slide backwards. Exports would fall off, unemployment would soar and an onerous national debt would become an impossible burden, Khan said.

However, this time, for a change, what Imran Khan has said about his cash-strapped country is nothing but the truth. Even as Pakistan grapples to save itself from the spread of deadly coronavirus, Imran Khan’s government also has severe economic crisis back home to take care of. His Naya Pakistan is incidentally in a war with itself as it deals with its debt-ridden economy.

The cash-strapped nation is currently grappling with the worst financial crisis in its history. The recently published World Bank report, which had retained its projection of India’s growth at 7.5% per annum for the next three fiscal years had predicted the growth of South Asia countries except for Pakistan, whose growth it is set to drop at 2.7% in the FY19-20.

Such is the gravity of the economic crisis in Pakistan that on the occasion of Eid, PM appealed to the people of Pakistan to stand united and help overcome the dire economic situation.

Since the time of his election as Pakistan Prime Minister, Khan has been negotiating with world leaders to winkle out bail packages and temporarily assuage the looming economic disaster without much help. A conducive environment for terrorism to spawn and flourish has also added to the woes of Pakistan as investors have remained away from the terror-prone country.

Pakistan is in desperate straits as economists’ predict its economy is on the brink of collapse. Its impoverished condition is, in fact, no laughing matter. The ‘Trade and Development Report 2019’ released by the United Nations on Thursday has also said that Pakistan’s economic crisis has not been resolved despite the fact that support from China and Saudi Arabia and a large IMF loan have helped address the immediate problem.

In a brief comment on Pakistan in the Asia section, UNCTAD’s annual flagship report went on to say that “Pakistan is in the midst of a crisis” as the growth rate has halved, the balance of payments is in poor shape, the rupee has depreciated significantly and external debt is large and rising.

While Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan has been busy bickering and whining like a toddler over Kashmir, his already cash-strapped country has been slipping further into a deeper economic crisis. The beggar country has been crying over the rising price of ‘roti’ and ‘naan’, tomatoes and milk. If things continue this way, the day is not far when the Google search engine’s controversy which throws up images of Imran Khan when one searches for “bikhari”- a Hindi word that means “Beggar”, might just change into a crude reality.

Nevertheless, for a country which needs to hold cabinet meetings to discuss increasing prices of Rotis and Naan, they have been threatening India with nuclear war, not once but thrice since India has repealed Article 370 in Jammu and Kashmir.

“Resort Politics” of Congress comes full circle as BJP seems poised to topple the Kamal Nath government in Madhya Pradesh

In the last few days, we have seen Congress party employing “Resort Politics” to tuck its Madhya Pradesh MLAs away at a secure place while the situation in the state appeared ripe for political upheaval. The huddling of Congress MLAs from Madhya Pradesh in a plush resort on the Delhi-Jaipur road last week heralded the impending political crisis in the state.

The Congress’ move to flock their MLAs to a safe location came amidst high-octane political drama that ensued following the resignation of Congress strongman Jyotiraditya Scindia along with 22 Congress legislators in Madhya Pradesh, sending shock waves to the Kamal Nath-led Congress government in the state. The resignation of the rebel legislators reduces the Madhya Pradesh assembly from 230 to 206, with the Congress party having 92 seats and the rival BJP having 107 seats. In such a scenario, BJP can easily cross the halfway mark of 104 for a majority, thus forcing the collapse of Kamal Nath-led government in the state.

In order to avert the looming crisis and possible defection of remaining MLAs to the BJP camp, Madhya Pradesh CM Kamal Nath sent the legislators to Buena Vista Resorts in Jaipur last week. In the meanwhile, the former Madhya Pradesh Chief Minister Shivraj Singh Chauhan filed an appeal in the Supreme Court seeking floor test in the state legislative assembly immediately. The apex court on Tuesday issued a 24-hour notice to the Kamal Nath government seeking a response on Chauhan’s petition by Wednesday morning 10:30 am.

In the annals of India’s political history, “Resort Politics” is not a new phenomenon. Incidentally, it was pioneered by the Congress party back in 1995 when they allegedly conspired with Shankersinh Vaghela and toppled the BJP government in Gujarat. Vaghela who had felt sidelined in the BJP because of Keshubhai Patel, flew out 45 BJP MLAs to Khajuraho in Madhya Pradesh (where Digvijaya Singh of the Congress was the Chief Minister) where he was sheltered with the rebel MLAs with the aid of the Congress regime in the state.

Later, after a middle ground was reached, Suresh Mehta was sworn in as the chief minister of Gujarat in October 1995 whose government lasted only for 11 months. In the subsequent elections, Vaghela became chief minister with Congress support and ruled the state for around two years before merging his newly formed Rashtriya Janata Party with it.

When faced with a political conundrum, Congress has often resorted to “Resort Politics”, most recently after the fallout between the erstwhile alliance partners BJP and Shiv Sena in Maharashtra. With no political party having a decisive majority to form a government in Maharashtra, Congress had holed up its Maharashtra MLAs in a resort near Jaipur to mull over the possibility of joining hands with the ideological rivals Shiv Sena to stop the BJP juggernaut. Eventually, the Congress and the NCP allied with the Shiv Sena party in Maharashtra and formed Maha Vikas Aghadi in the state with Shiv Sena supremo Uddhav Thackeray as the state chief minister.

However, history appears to have come full circle as Congress seems to be at the receiving end of its “Resort Politics”. The BJP in Madhya Pradesh, the place where the first instance of Congress’ “Resort Politics” manifested, is all set to dethrone the Kamal Nath led Congress government in the state. It has housed the rebel 22 Congress MLAs, including the 6 ministers from Kamal Nath’s cabinet, in a resort in Karnataka to stave off Congress’ desperate attempts to lure back their MLAs in order to somehow cling to power in Madhya Pradesh.

However, this is not the first time that the BJP will be trouncing the Congress party in its own game. In July 2019, during the intense power tussle in Karnataka, the Congress and the JDS had herded its MLAs in resorts to keep the flock together. However, the encampment of the MLAs did not help the Congress party as the BJP adroitly toppled the 14-month long Congress-JDS government in the state and formed its own government.

The people with a rare gift of wisdom: The unsung heroes of Nagaland

by Dr Raktim Patar

On 26th February 2020, I had a god-sent opportunity to witness an event perhaps one of the rarest of the rare in the history of Nagaland. That day, the Governor of Nagaland R.N. Ravi dedicated the Durbar Hall of the Raj Bhavan in Kohima in presence of Chief Minister Mr Neiphiu Rio and host of other dignitaries to Dr Imkongliba Ao, in honour and recognition of his contribution towards building of peaceful and developed Nagaland. Besides, the Governor also handed over letters of commendation to Padmabhushan Dr S.C. Jamir, the former Governor of Maharashtra, Goa, Orissa and the former Chief Minister of Nagaland and other 20 visionary Naga leaders belonging to Major tribes of Nagaland in recognition of their profound courage and love for peace and prosperity of fellow Naga people and patriotism who signed the 16 point agreement that paved the way for the creation of the state of Nagaland. During the function, I heard the emotional voices of some of the family members of the leaders which made me realised that the real heroes of Nagaland were never given their due recognition, rather they were blamed as traitors of Naga people by those who are enjoying the sweet fruits of the sacrifices made by them.

Nagaland came into existence as the 16th state of Indian union on 1st December 1963. It had experienced insurgency and bloodshed for quite a long time before attending statehood. The painstaking and dangerous journey towards attaining a separate identity within the constitution of India with a unique name and special provision of 371(A) was a history of sacrifices and courage of some patriotic Naga leaders that has been deliberately omitted in the history of modern Nagaland. In the contemporary history of Northeast of India in general and Nagaland, in particular, one can find the names of the militant leaders like British citizen Phizo and others and their unjustified violence for a so-called separate Nagalim or Greater Nagaland but the persons who had braved the dangers of losing their lives for the cause of the Naga people has never been given due recognition. On the contrary, they have treated with utmost disrespect and sometimes blamed as agents of India for their timely and futuristic decision to settle the Naga issue through debate and discussion and a settlement within the ambit of the Indian constitution.

Since the Indian independence in 1947, there was a demand for a separate Nagaland for which a group of Naga youth started China-backed armed conflict with the Indian government. As a result, thousands of people were killed, the villages were dislocated/destroyed, educational institutions were closed down, the economy plunged into the depth of sea, starvation and famine become a common phenomenon in the life of the Naga. Poverty and underdevelopment almost pushed the Naga people into primitive age. At this juncture, a group of courageous people under the leadership of Dr Imkongliba Ao decided to hold the first Naga Peoples’ Convention to discuss the future of the Naga people. Amid the sea of violence and bloodshed they toured the length and breadths of Naga inhabited area and convinced all the 16 major Naga tribes to send their representative for the convention that was held at Kohima from 22nd to 26th August in 1957. In this convention, more than 1735 representatives of all the major tribes of the Nagas, particularly Naga hill and Tuensang area of erstwhile North-East Frontier Agency along with 2000 observers from other Naga areas such as Manipur, Burma, actively deliberated the issue for a respectable and peaceful political solution of the Naga problem.

Due to the efforts of Dr Imkongliba Ao and leaders like him, the convention resolved to solve the Naga problem through satisfactory political settlement within the union of India and appealed the Naga people to give up the cult of violence for the greater peace and prosperity. It marked the beginning of a new era in the history of Nagaland. With the prompt response from the Indian government, the Naga leaders decided to go ahead with the resolution adopted by the Naga Peoples’ Convention and discussed with the then Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru in September 1957. On the eve of their journey to New Delhi, Dr Ao, a visionary and a profound lover of peace, stated that they believed neither in violence nor in the creation of an independent Naga state and what they wanted was a modification into the existing administrative set up so that they could share the fruits of India’s independence and develop following their own economic, social and religious beliefs.

After a fruitful discussion, the government of India decided to amend the sixth schedule of the Indian constitution and created an administrative unit separate from Assam by the name Naga Hills Tuensang Area on 1st December 1957. It was the first milestone in the way of the creation of the autonomous state of Nagaland within the framework of the Indian Union. As a result, 3000 Naga underground rebels came out voluntarily including Phizo’s son and daughter saying that they were unable to bear the hardships of life in the jungles. While the hostile forces denounced the settlement, the peace-loving Naga held it as the dawn of the new era in Nagaland. However, hostilities continued in Nagaland. The rebels continued their plunder, attack and killing of the innocent Nagas.

Nevertheless, the peace-loving Naga organised a second Naga Peoples’ Convention in May 1958, as encouraged by the success of the first Naga Peoples’ Convention held in August 1957. Despite the protest and threat of the hostile Nagas, the second convention was held at Ungma village in Mokokchung district from 21st to 23rd May 1958. It was attended by more than 2,705 delegates representing various Naga tribes. It reaffirmed the decision taken in the first Naga Peoples Convention and expressed their satisfaction over the improved law and order situation in the Naga Hill. The convention strongly condemned all sorts of violence, dacoity, theft, intimidation false impersonation and propaganda, the imposition of fines and closing down of schools in certain areas.

Further, the convention formed a liaison committee under the leadership of Dr Imkongliba Ao and 7 other members to explore the possibilities for an agreed solution to the Naga problems and to convince and bring the underground Naga into the peace process. It was a horrendous task to contact and convince the politically motivated Naga underground leaders. Nevertheless, they risked their lives and made contact with them in the deep jungles but failed to convince them to fall in line with the Naga Peoples’ Convention. Subsequently, a drafting committee was formed which formulated a 16-point proposal. The sixteen-point proposal envisaged the formation of a new state to be known as Nagaland within the Indian Union comprising the territories hitherto known as the Naga Hills Tuensang Area (NHTA).

The sixteen-point proposal was placed before the third Naga Peoples’ Convention which met at Mokokchung from 22nd to 26th October in 1959. It approved the proposal to be placed before the government of India and requested the underground Nagas to come overground and to give up the path of violence and to participate in the running of the new government of Nagaland. Dr Imkongliba Ao, who was instrumental in the drafting of the 16 point proposal, in his letter dated 26th July 1960 to the Prime Minister of India clearly stated, “It is only in a separate homeland of our own, we will fully play our part in the development of the country as a whole and running of our popular government according to our culture and traditions. Finally, the sixteen-point agreement was concluded between the 21 representatives under the chairmanship of Dr Imkongliba Ao and the government of India on 30 July 1960. They were leaders and nation builders of post-colonial India!

Read- The 21 leaders of Naga People’s Convention: Heroes of Nagaland that the nation forgot

Following the agreement, an Interim Body comprising of 42 members and Dr Imkongliba Ao as its Chairman was inaugurated in presence of thousands of peace-loving Naga people by Gen. Shri Nagesh, the governor of Assam, on 18th February 1961 at Kohima. The members of the interim body expressed their allegiance to the constitution of India and committed themselves to work for the upliftment and general welfare of the people. Dr Ao appealed to the hostile Nagas to abandon the path of violence and not to sabotage the final decision of the Naga people who wanted to have no more bloodshed, suffering and miseries. However, the Rebels turned a deaf ear to the appeal and continued their hostile activities against the government and the Naga people. Out of frustration, they assassinated Dr Imkongliba Ao at Mukokchung on 22 August 1961, while he was returning at night from his dispensary after serving the sick and needy.

The person who wanted to create a peaceful and developed Nagaland to compete with the rest of the world came to an end. In contemporary history, Dr Ao and his colleagues’ contributions were forgotten. After 58 years of silence in the hills of Nagaland, Dr Imkongliba Ao and his visionary friends are now being honoured. It is indeed a humble but incomparable gesture by the Governor of Nagaland. Dr Ao and his men never thought of their aggrandisement or self-benefit, what they did were out of their devotion and love for the people of Nagaland. They deserve more than what the people of Nagaland should give to them. Unfortunately, Naga rebels denigrated them and the rest of the country forgot them!

Contributions of Leaders of Naga People’s Convention is not only towards building a peaceful and prosperous Nagaland but also sowing the seeds of a peaceful North East of India and stabilising our nation’s eastern frontier!

(Author is Dr Raktim Patar, academician, historian, thinker and writer. He is a research scholar at North East Centre, New Delhi)

Karni Sena disrupts shooting of Akshay Kumar starrer ‘Prithviraj’

Bollywood actor Akshay Kumar starrer Prithviraj, which is slated to release in November 2020 has run into trouble with Karni Sena. This comes soon after the political drama surrounding the Sanjay Leela Bhansali movie Padmaavat and Kangana Ranaut’s Manikarnika finally fizzled out. Karni Sena has disrupted shooting of the film threatening that ‘no tampering of facts’ will be tolerated.

Members of the outfit, led by its national president Mahipal Singh Makrana, staged a protest at the shooting of the film in Jaipur’s Jamwaramgarh village, Saturday and asked the director, Chandra Prakash, to stop the shooting. Despite the assurance from the makers that the film’s script does not tamper with any historic facts, the organisation was not convinced and have demanded a written assurance from the team.

“We held discussions with the director, Chandra Prakash, regarding the film’s script today. We told him that no tampering with historic facts will be tolerated,” Makrana said on Monday. “Prithviraj Chauhan should not be portrayed as a lover in the film. The director has assured us that there is no such thing in the movie but we want a written assurance,” he said.

Prior to this, Karni Sena had protested against Kangana Ranaut’s Manikarnika: The Queen of Jhansi. They claimed that it had distorted history and will not let the film release unless their terms are met. They were reported to be upset as they believed that the film showed a relationship between Laxmibai and a British officer. They had also claimed that the film showed the queen dancing to a special number, which is against their tradition. 

Prior to that, a controversy over Bollywood movie ‘Padmaavat’ had brought the Rajput Karni Sena to national prominence, albeit for the wrong reasons. It had offered a bounty of Rs 5 crore to chop off the nose of Deepika Padukone, who had essayed the role of Rani Padmini and also vandalised property at a Madhya Pradesh school where students were performing on “Ghoomar”, a song from the movie. The period drama set in the 14th-century had enraged the Rajput group who demanded that the film be banned for allegedly “disrespecting the sentiments of the community”. Their agitation had forced its makers to change its name from ‘Padmavati’ to ‘Padmaavat’.

The Congress, whose favoured political tactics has always been appeasement, had encashed the opportunity and played a clever double game over the protests, bearing in mind the elections in Rajasthan later that year.

It was reported by us how Digvijay Singh came out in support of the Anti-Padmaavat protests and claimed that movies, which ‘hurt sentiments of any religion or caste should not be made’. That year in December, the Congress returned to power in Rajasthan 2018 after defeating the BJP.

In 2008, Asutosh Gowarikar’s period drama Jodhaa Akbar, too, faced the wrath of the Senas. Alleging that the movie had distorted history, the activists claimed that the portrayal of Jodha Bai in the movie was not true to facts, Jodha Bai, a princess of Jodhpur, was not married to Akbar, they said.

After the release of the movie, they wrote letters in blood and sent it to theatre owners of the state against screening the movie. Eventually, the movie was not released in Rajasthan. The Sena leaders also urged the Rajput organisations in other states not to screen the movie.

Prithviraj is an upcoming 2020 Bollywood Hindi historical action drama film, directed by Chandraprakash Dwivedi and produced by Aditya Chopra under his production house Yash Raj Films. It is about the life of Chahamana king Prithviraj Chauhan and stars Akshay Kumar in the lead role of Chauhan, while Manushi Chhillar (in her film debut) plays his wife Samyukta. The film was officially announced on 9 September 2019 and it will probably be theatrically released in India on 13 November 2020 during the Diwali festival.

Union Government defends CAA in affidavit filed in Supreme Court, says there is narrow scope of judicial review

In a 129-page affidavit, the Union Government has defended the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) before the Supreme Court of India. Emphasising on the powers vested in the Parliament to legislate on the subject of citizenship, it argued that CAA “may not be within the scope of judicial review.”

The affidavit was filed after a 3-Judge Bench of the Supreme Court in January granted the Union Government 4 weeks time to respond to the petitions contesting the legality of the Citizenship Amendment Act. The apex court had refused to put a stay on the implementation of the humanitarian law.

The affidavit read, “CAA is a benign piece of legislation which seeks to provide relaxation, in the nature of an amnesty, to specific communities from the specified countries with a clear cut-off date.” The government further argued, “CAA does not impinge upon any existing right that may have existed prior to the enactment of the amendment and further, in no manner whatsoever, seeks to affect the legal, democratic or secular rights of any of the Indian citizens.”

The decision of the Government to make “reasonable classification” between the religious minorities (Hindus, Sikhs, Jains, Parsis, Christians and Buddhists) and the majority (Muslims) had drawn the ire of the left-liberal ecosystem in the country. The Centre has justified the classification as a “necessity” for the purpose of special legislation.

Highlighting the narrow scope of judicial review and the plight of religious minorities in India’s neighbourhood, the affidavit stated, “The constitutionality of such a legislative measure ought to be tested within that legislative domain and cannot be conflated to extend beyond that object and the reasons behind the Parliamentary cognizance of the issue by which the competent Legislature has, in its wisdom, devised a legislative policy to deal with the acknowledged problem of persecution of the particular communities in the specified countries who are, by their very Constitutions, theocratic countries.”

CAA which embraces the idea of India is aimed to speed up the citizenship process of minorities from neighbouring Islamic Republics of Bangladesh, Afghanistan and Pakistan who had to India before December 31, 2014, owing to religious persecution. Several petitions have been filed at the apex court against the legislation. A petition filed by Indian Union Muslim League (IUML) alleges that it violates the fundamental Right to Equality and intends to grant citizenship to a section of illegal immigrants by making an exclusion on the basis of religion. IUML says that CAA us against the basic structure of the Constitution and intended to explicitly discriminate against Muslims.

Lawyer of Nirbhaya rape and murder convicts approaches NHRC seeking to stay the execution

0

The lawyer of rape and murder convicts in the Nirbhaya case, AP Singh said on Tuesday said that he has approached the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) for seeking a stay on the execution of four convicts.

AP Singh told the reporters, “We have appealed the NHRC to stay the March 20 death warrant, which is a miscarriage of justice. The basis for the appeal is that Ram Singh, who is believed to have committed suicide in Tihar jail, has a 70-year old mother and a 10-year-old son.”

AP Singh alleged that Ram Singh was lynched in jail and his brother Mukesh Singh, another convict is the sole witness of the incident, therefore, he should be kept alive. “At that time it was suspected that Ram Singh had committed suicide. Now that the Book ‘Black Warrant’ has come out, it is clear that Ram Singh was lynched and jail officials were involved in it,” said AP Singh.

AP Singh alleged that the probe into Ram Singh’s death was biased and no compensation has been paid to his family. He said, “The probe into the alleged suicide was biased. Yet compensation has not been given to the family of the deceased. Mukesh is the only witness to the incident. If he is executed in a hurry, it will be a miscarriage of justice and violation of human rights.”

Singh urged the Human Rights Commission to stay the execution, seek records in the matter and give compensation to the family of Ram Singh.

Earlier on Tuesday, Mukesh Singh, who is one of the convicts in Nirbhaya’s rape and murder approached a Delhi court seeking repeal of the death penalty with a claim that he was not present in Delhi when the gruesome act of crime was committed. But the court dismissed his plea. The court also sent the matter to the Bar Council of India (BCI) asking them to give appropriate sensitisation exercise to Singh’s counsel.

The four convicts in the Nirbhaya rape and murder case- Mukesh Singh, Akshay Thakur, Pawan Gupta, and Vinay Sharma are scheduled to be hanged on 20 March at 5:30 am.

Karnataka Doctor who had treated India’s first causality in the coronavirus outbreak tests positive for the virus

0

A Doctor who had treated the 76-year-old patient who succumbed to the Covid-19 infection in Karnataka’s Kalaburgi has now tested positive for the virus. The 76-year-old person was the first person to die in India due to the outbreak. The senior citizen who had returned from Saudi Arabia was reported dead while in isolation on March 10.

While speaking to ANI, Deputy Commissioner of Kalaburgi Sharat B said, “The Doctor who treated the 76-year-old is tested positive. He along with his family have been kept in-home quarantine at his home. He will be sent to the isolation ward today.” The Karnataka health officials are notifying patients and staff who came into contact with the doctor.

The 63-year-old doctor is among the two latest cases reported by the state of Karnataka today taking the toll of infected patients up to 10 in the state.

The health Minister of Karnataka B Srirammulu informed on twitter on Tuesday that Two more cases have been reported in Karnataka, one is of a 20-year-old female who travelled from the UK and another contact of P6 (Kalaburgi deceased patient). Both are admitted to designated isolation hospitals.

Earlier, Chief Minister of Karnataka BS Yediyurappa announced the closure of Malls, cinema halls, pubs, schools, colleges, summer camps, exhibitions, and other events that approaches mass gatherings across the state in order to prevent the vastly spreading threat of coronavirus.

Coronavirus: Despite Delhi Police’s request to Shaheen Bagh ‘protestors’ to vacate the area, they refuse to budge

Following the Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal’s order to call off all religious, family, social, political or cultural gathering in the wake of threat due to Coronavirus in the national capital, the Delhi police have reached the protest site.

According to reports, the police along with Resident Welfare Association members Tuesday afternoon spoke to the protesters and requested them to call off their protest. The protestors have, however, not considered paying heed to the repeated requests to vacate the place. In the wake of the Novel Coronavirus outbreak, the Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal on Monday invoked the Epidemic Diseases Act of 1897 and declared a new set of bans to limit the spread of the highly contagious disease.

In the press release, the AAP supremo announced a complete ban on social, religious and political gatherings of more than 50 people in the national capital. The ban, effective immediately, will also be applicable on Shaheen Bagh ‘protest’ site where Muslim women have been sitting on a ‘protest’ against the amended Citizenship Law for the past three months now.

However, the Muslim women sitting there, carrying on the feigned peaceful protest have said blatantly that the protest will go on undeterred and that they will not comply with the Delhi government’s orders. They have apparently been praying and reading the Quran at the protest site, believing that praying to Allah would safeguard them from the coronavirus crisis. 

Besides, wooden benches have been laid down at the protest site and instructions have been given that not more than two protestors will sit on one bench. As a precaution, the elders have put on masks and children have been kept away from the protest site, but they somehow are not willing to end the overplayed protest.

These unsympathetic and hard-hearted ‘protestors’ seem to have zero respect for public safety and human life. These selfish ‘protestors’ said they would sit in for protests in groups of 45 people to circumvent the Delhi government order prohibiting gathering of 50 or more people. This just goes out to show that they do not care for public health and safety either.

The national capital has reported seven confirmed coronavirus cases so far. India had reported its second casualty due to coronavirus, with the health ministry confirming on March 14 that a 68-year-old woman died in Delhi. India has 126 confirmed cases of COVID-19 coronavirus as on March 17, 2020, at 11.52 AM and three people have as of now died with the infection.