Home Blog Page 5779

Maharashtra: Congress MLA Aslam Shaikh who opposed Yakub Memon’s hanging is now minister in Uddhav Thackeray cabinet

Congress MLA Aslam Shaikh who had written a letter to the then President of India Pranab Mukherjee appealing for mercy for 1993 Mumbai bomb blasts convict Yakub Memon’s hanging will now be a minister in Uddhav Thackeray-led Shiv Sena-NCP-Congress government. Shaikh today swore in as a cabinet minister.

Aslam Shaikh letter to Pranab Mukherjee who was the then President of India (image: @sureshnakhua on Twitter)

on 28th July, 2015, Shaikh along with other colleagues of his had written to Mukherjee to consider giving mercy to Yakub Memon for his role in 1993 Mumbai bomb blasts.

Along with Shaikh, Congress leaders Ashok Chavan, Vijay Vadettiwar, Varsha Gaikwad, Sunil Kedar, Amit Deshmukh, Yashomati Thakur, Aslam Shaikh, KC Padvi also swore in. NCP leaders Dilip Wales Patil, Dhananjay Munde, Anil Deshmukh, Hassan Mushrif, Rajendra Shingne, Nawab Malik, Rajesh Tope, Balasaheb Patil, Jitendra Awhad too took an oath as ministers while Ajit Pawar swore in as Deputy Chief Minister.

Read: Jharkhand: Month after snubbing Uddhav Thackeray, Rahul Gandhi attends Hemant Soren’s swearing in ceremony

Shiv Sena leaders Aaditya Thackeray, Anil Parab, Uday Samant, Sanjay Rathod, Gulabrao Patil, Dada Bhuse, Sandipan Bhumre too swore in as cabinet ministers.

Despite Priyanka Gandhi Vadra breaching security protocol, appropriate security cover was provided: CRPF calls out the Congress scion

Two days after the drama Congress created over “security breach” of Priyanka Gandhi Vadra during her visit to Lucknow, the CRPF on Monday said there was no breach in the Congress leader’s security and blamed her for violations for travelling as a pillion rider on a scooter.

The CRPF, which provides armed commandos under the ‘Z+’ category of security cover to Gandhi, said due to her unscheduled movement without intimation, the advance security liaison (ASL) protocol could not be conducted.

The CRPF IG in his statement released on Monday said: “During travelling, the protectee (Priyanka) used a non-BR civil vehicle without PSO. The protectee took a lift in scooty as a pillion rider. Despite these security constraints, appropriate security cover was provided by CRPF during the visit. Such security lapses are communicated to the protectee and advised for ensuring proper security arrangements.”

Read: Congress releases video to show how police manhandled Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, proves it was her goons that heckled lady police officer

Responding to the charges, the CRPF said in a statement: “On December 28, the only programme indicated was a visit to PCC office for attending Congress foundation function, for which an advance security liaison (ASL) protocol had been conducted. On December 28, Abhay Mishra, CO Hazratganj, at around 8 am visited the place of stay to enquire about the detailed programme of the day of the protectee which was not communicated by the personal staff. There was no breach in security by the official.”

CRPF has also said that there were 10 security personnel in close proximity of Priyanka Gandhi Vadra.

The statement released by CRPF

On Saturday, Gandhi’s office had written to CRPF VIP security in-charge, alleging that circle officer of Hazratganj, Abhay Mishra, issued threats to her security personnel and warned of restricting her movements. Her office also demanded appropriate action against the officer.

Mishra shouted at them and demanded information of the protectee’s schedule which had been provided to the authorities on Friday, the letter said.

He then accused the CRPF personnel of withholding information since they had readied their fleet as is their standard protocol every morning, it said. He further threatened the CRPF personnel that he will not provide any security cover to the protectee and will not allow the protectee to take even two steps out of the premises, the letter said.

Read: Uttar Pradesh: Congress worker who drove Priyanka Gandhi Vadra without wearing helmet challaned for Rs 6100

To which Abhay Mishra responded today saying that there was no breach in security by the officials alleging that the protectee (Priyanka Gandhi) used a non-BR civil vehicle without PSO. However, despite security constraints, appropriate security cover was provided by CRPF during the visit, the officer claimed.

On Saturday, Gandhi-scion Priyanka Gandhi Vadra was in Uttar Pradesh in order to meet the family of an “anti-CAA activist” who was arrested by UP police. Priyanka Gandhi Vadra had alleged that the UP police had roughed her up and manhandled her. However, video evidence proves that Priyanka Gandhi Vadra was, as usual, spreading fake news.

After Lucknow Police stopped Priyanka Gandhi Vadra on the way to meet ‘anti-CAA activist’ ex-IPS officer SR Darapuri’s family, she hopped on to a two-wheeler which was being driven by a Congress worker and whizzed past.

Read: UP police officer Dr Archana Singh rejects Priyanka Gandhi Vadra’s manhandling allegations, says her car had diverted from scheduled route

After Congress leader Priyanka Gandhi Vadra misled the public by making false claims that she was manhandled by police personnel on her way to the residence of a former IPS officer held for anti-CAA protests, the Uttar Pradesh lady police officer Dr Archana Singh said the allegations were false.

Describing the sequence of events, Archana Singh refuted allegations that she manhandled Priyanka Gandhi Vadra, claiming it to be baseless.

India Today publishes report with misleading headline implying that UP govt took blankets back after distribution by CM: Read details

On December 29, India Today published a news story with a completely misleading headline which shows that Yogi Adityanath government of the Uttar Pradesh in very poor light. The headline of the story is “Homeless people asked to return blankets given by CM Yogi Adityanath, case filed against accused”.  The text used by India Today to share the report on Twitter was even more misleading, as it said, “Soon after the CM Yogi Adityanath left, destitute people were asked to return the blankets given to them.”


The headline and tweet give the impression that the blankets were taken by the government after they were distributed by the CM, implying that it was done only for photographs. Moreover, the headline is also unclear about who is the accused, and people may assume that the case is filed against the homeless people.

As expected, people started attacking the UP government based on this report.


Even the Senior Associate Editor of the Print also shared the India Today tweet.


But contrary to what the India Today headline and tweet are implying, the UP government didn’t take the blankets back after distribution. It was some unknown person who did it, and now the administration has filed a case against those officials.

According to reports, UP CM Yogi Adityanath had visited government hospitals and shelters for homeless on December 26, and distributed blankets to the poor people. But about one hour after the CM left, few people had taken the blankets back. It is not known whether those persons were govt officials or some other people. After the news of the blankets being taken was published by a few local newspapers on 28th, the administration took note of the same and a case was registered against unknown persons.

FIR filed against unknown people in the case

The administration has said that they have not taken the blankets back. The FIR filed in the case also mentions that the blankets were not taken back by the administration, and it was done by some unknown people.

Therefore, the India Today report, particularly the headline and the tweet, is completely misleading.

Iranian national arrested in Bihar for living in India as Buddhist monk for 11 years without visa

0

An Iranian national was arrested by security forces in Bihar after he was caught to living in India for 11 years in the garb of a Buddhist monk without a visa. The person was arrested when he was attempting to cross over to Nepal without valid documents at the India-Nepal border in the East Champaran district in Bihar.

The man has been identified as 38 years old Hamed Akbari, and he is a resident of Rajakan area of the Iranian capital Tehran.

An Iranian passport and a UNHCR card were recovered from Akbari by the immigration officials at the border. According to officials, he had reached Raxaul onboard a Bharat Nepal Maitri bus service from Bodh Gaya. He was wearing robes of a Buddhist monk, and he was caught during a routine search of the bus on Saturday night at around 10 PM.

Read- West Bengal: Days after Mamata’s cabinet minister Siddiqullah threatened Amit Shah, Bangladesh Govt denies Mamata’s Minister Visa

Akbari claimed to be a Buddhist monk, and said that he is living in India since 2008 and currently staying at Bodh Gaya. He refused to say more about himself, saying his Guru has ordered him to not talk about his past.

A K Pankaj, DSP immigration posted at Raxaul, said, “The manner in which he was staying in India since the last 11 years without any visa and had procured UNHRC Card and was giving statements clearly incongruent in nature, it only leads to suspicion of sorts.” The Iranian national was found violating section 14B of the Foreigners Act, 1946, and was handed over to local police at Raxaul for further action.

The Judiciary in 2019: Six significant verdicts that either created a storm or brought an end to one

The government took many historic decisions in 2019. The Judiciary, too, issued quite a few historic verdicts on various matters of import in 2019. Some verdicts were indeed of great commendation while others left plenty to be desired. In this article, we shall go through a list of verdicts delivered by the Judiciary that either created a storm or brought an end to one.

1. The Ram Mandir verdict

The Supreme Court, on the 9th of November, brought to an end one of the greatest historic struggles for the Hindu Community. With its landmark judgment, the Supreme Court paved the way for a Bhavya Ram Mandir at Ram Janmabhoomi. The Court verdict also awarded five acres of alternate land to the Muslim community.

Read: The comprehensive legal History of Ram Janmabhoomi case: A case that will have its relevance for generations to come

In its verdict, the Court took into account historical facts about Ram Janmabhoomi and accepted that a Hindu Temple did stand at the site of the disputed structure. Liberals and Muslims were definitely not happy with the verdict but everyone saw it as an inevitability given the overbundance of evidence in favour of the Hindu community. Later, review petitions were also filed by the Muslim petitioners but they were rejected by the Supreme Court.

2. The Rafale Verdict

The Supreme Court in November dismissed the review petitions against the December 14th judgement of the SC which declined to order a probe into the procurement of 36 Rafale fighter jets by the Modi government from Dassault Aviation. The review petitions were filed by Advocate Prashant Bhushan, Arun Shourie and Yashwant Sinha.

Read: Here is a compilation of the lies spread by Rahul Gandhi about the Rafale Deal in the run up to 2019 Lok Sabha Elections

It is pertinent to mention here that the documents leaked by The Hindu were cropped and digitally manipulated to conceal evidence that can go against the Rafale case that Modi detractors were trying to build to help Congress and Rahul Gandhi in the run-up to 2019 elections.

Read: Rafale Saga: A sinister attempt to undermine Democracy by the liberal media-political establishment has been crushed

The Supreme Court has held that the plea on charges of perjury against the officials is also not fair. While the judgement did cast a shadow on the integrity of Rahul Gandhi who furthered this lie repeatedly, it also indicted The Hindu that published cropped documents in order to further this lie.

3. The Sabarimala Review Petition Verdict

The Supreme Court led by CJI Ranjan Gogoi could not come to a conclusive decision in Sabarimala review petitions and have referred the case to a larger bench by a 3:2 majority. The Supreme Court said that the issue of women’s entry into the Sabarimala temple is not just limited to Sabarimala. It involves the entry of women into Mosques as well. The Supreme Court referenced to larger Bench of issues arising in case of entry of Muslim women into a mosque, female genital mutilation cannot be ruled out.

Read: Amit Shah stands by Sabarimala devotees, says SC should not interfere in religious customs: Read details

CJI, justices- Khanvilkar and Malhotra viewed to refer the matter to a larger bench. Justices Chandrachur and Nariman gave dissent view on Sabrimala review pleas. The Supreme Court could not reach a consensus on the review petitions and this, the Sabarimala matter referred to a larger bench by 3:2 J Chandrachud and Nariman dissent Review petitions being kept pending.

Read: Today’s judgement by Supreme Court has effectively dislodged the 2018 verdict in Sabarimala case: Advocate J Sai Deepak

Later, the Supreme Court declined to pass an order on the plea to allow the entry of two women into the Sabarimala temple, which meant there was effectively a stay on its 2018 verdict that permitted the desecration of the Sabarimala Temple.

4. The Pashubali Verdict

In the last week of September, the Tripura High Court in an atrocious judgment banned Pashubali (animal sacrifice) at the Maa Tripureswari Mandir in Udaipur and other Hindu temples in Tripura. Tripureswari temple, also known as Tripura Sundari Temple, is one of the 51 Shaktipeeths, and Pashubali is an integral custom of the temple. Kamaleswari Kali temple, located beside the India-Bangladesh border in Kasba village in west Tripura, is another important temple in the state where Pasbhubali is performed.

Read: Read details of the bizarre Tripura High Court judgement banning animal sacrifice at Shakti temples in Tripura

However, for a while even after the ban, Pashubali continued at the Temple as the administration was hesitant to implement the order. Ultimately, the Supreme Court, nearly two months later, issued an interim order that permitted the resumption of the sacred ritual at the Temple.

5. The Quran Distribution Verdict

A Ranchi court in July granted bail to a woman who was arrested for allegedly hurting ‘religious sentiments’ by writing about Tabrez Ansari’s death on her Facebook account. However, while granting the bail, the court put up a condition that she should distribute copies of Quran to various Islamic organisations.

Read: Ranchi Bar Association boycotts the judge who had ordered Ranchi girl to distribute Quran as bail condition

Magistrate Manish Singh had ordered Richa Bharti to distribute a copy of Quran to Anjuman Islamia in presence of the administration and take an acknowledgement receipt. She was supposed to donate four other copies of the Quran to other schools and colleges. Bharti could take help of local police administration in this. She was ordered to collect receipts and submit them to the court in 15 days. Over and above this, she was also asked to deposit two bonds of Rs 7,000 each.

Read: Richa Bharti case: Ranchi Court takes back order to distribute Quran after state govt and investigating officer’s request

The verdict created a huge furore across the country and people were outraged by what they considered a clear attempt to hurt the religious sentiments of Hindus. Ultimately, the Court was forced to take back its crazy order and things returned to normalcy.

6. The Madras High Court’s Richa Bharti Moment

The Madras High Court ordered a youth in October charged with posting objectionable content on Facebook to pay Rs 25,000 each to a trust run by the Tamil Nadu Muslim Munnetra Kazhagam (TMMK) and an orphanage run by a Christian organisation in Mayiladuthirai (Mayavaram) in Nagapattinam district as a condition for his anticipatory bail.

Read: Madras HC orders youth to pay Rs. 25,000 each to Islamist and a Christian organisation to receive anticipatory bail for a Facebook post

The TMMK is an Islamic Fundamentalist organization that has a history of its members engaging in radical activities. However, despite numerous objections by the petitioner, the Madras High Court issued the highly controversial order.

Tamil Nadu: Dalit villagers deny media reports of converting to Islam after wall collapse incident which left 17 dead

0

Days after media had reported that 3,000 Dalits in Mettupalayam, Tamil Nadu, converted to Islam, the villagers have denied these reports. Last week it was reported that the villagers had converted to Islam because of alleged caste discrimination following death of 17 people due to wall collapse.

The villagers say that they are Hindus and worship Lord Ram and that no Muslim organisation had approached them for religious conversion. Tamil Puligal Katchi, a Tamil outfit had claimed that they chose to embrace Islam because of lack of empathy. In Mettupalayam, Coimbatore, a 20-ft wall had collapsed earlier this month due to incessant rains. The wall was built 5 years ago to keep the Dalits away from the upper caste neighbours. The wall collapse claimed lives of 17 people.

Read: The Wire and IndiaSpend’s Factchecker journalist caught trying to manipulate Dalit victims who were attacked by local Muslims to prove ‘no hate crime’

Kin of the deceased have also expressed their intentions to not convert to Islam. Police officer, on condition of anonymity reportedly told Hindustan Times that it is the political outfit which took the ‘decision’ of conversion to Islam and that villagers don’t really want to give up their religious beliefs.

Five Big Bang decisions of Modi Govt in 2019, how it laid the foundation for New India and marked The Dawn of a New Age

The year 2019 will go down as the year in which India was changed forever. The Central Government over the course of one year has taken a series of decisions that have altered the fundamental nature of the Indian State for the foreseeable future. In this article, we review the decisions of the Central Government that have made 2019 one of the most, if not the most, consequential year in the history of Independent India.

1. The Balakot Airstrikes

The Balakot Airstrikes raised the costs of Pakistan’s ‘Bleed India with a thousand cuts’ strategy by several folds. For decades, it has been the preferred strategy of Pakistan. Numerous terrorist attacks have happened since the dawn of this century which went unanswered by the Indian government. However, when Narendra Modi assumed power in 2014, there was enough indication that things were about to change.

Following the Surgical Strikes of 2016, it was almost taken for granted that Pakistan will have to pay for the Pulwama Terror Attack. No one really doubted that Pakistan will be made to pay, the only question was when and how. And the Balakot Airstrikes answered that question perfectly.

Read: “We had the bull’s eye. All over in 90 seconds”, Balakot airstrike pilots confirm that they had hit the terror camps

The most significant aspect of it was the fact that India had definitively called out Pakistan’s nuclear bluff. In a nightmare scenario for Pakistan, India’s nuclear-capable aircraft carried out the airstrikes at Balakot, which is less than 200 km via road from Islamabad and less than 70 km from Abbottabad.

Amidst everything that happened, two quotes by Narendra Modi about the entire series of events sum up how India’s response to Pakistan had changed fundamentally. The Prime Minister said, quite famously, “Ghar me ghuske maarengey” and on another occasion, he said while referring to Pakistan’s penchant for threatening India with nuclear war, “Don’t we have nuclear weapons also? Humney Diwali ke liye rakha hai kya?” It proved conclusively that the relationship with Pakistan will never be the same again.

2. The anti-Triple Talaq Act

Given everything else that has happened in one year, it is one of those things that doesn’t receive sufficient attention. But the passage of the Bill was the first sign of the things that were in store for the country. It was for the first time in a great many years, since the opening of the locks of the Babri probably, that the fundamentalist sections of the Muslim community were overruled by the democratic institutions of the country without any manner of negotiations whatsoever.

Read: Pandit Nehru will be pleased that Narendra Modi could achieve what Panditji dreamed of: Arif Mohd Khan on Triple Talaq Bill

The Secular Parties were entirely opposed to it, and crucially, the Bill safely passed through the Rajya Sabha despite great opposition. It was the first indication that the second term of the Modi government will be radically different from its first term. Even so, the value of the passage of this Bill was more symbolic than any real benefit for national interests. The biggest indication of it was that the BJP had a working majority in the Rajya Sabha for more crucial bills.

3. The Abrogation of Article 370

The abrogation of Article 370 was the first core agenda that was fulfilled by the Modi government within three months of Amit Shah’s reign as the Home Minister of the country. It was a testament to the rising stature of India in global politics that despite Pakistan’s continuous wailing and screaming, absolutely no one apart from the usual suspects paid them any attention. The world by and large was in India’s favour.

Read: Not happy that I can’t buy land in Kashmir, Kashmir Pandits and Buddhists in Ladakh are discriminated against: Indira Gandhi in 1981 letter

Domestically, the Indian Government demonstrated that it was willing to do everything necessary in order to secure national interests. There was considerable opposition from the Congress party and its ilk but once again, the BJP found the necessary numbers to ensure the passage of the required bills through both houses of the Parliament. The conduct of the Opposition parties revealed abundantly that it won’t support the BJP even when the saffron party was acting in the national interest.

Read: Manmohan Singh lies blatantly, claims Congress voted in favour of abrogation of Article 370

Regardless, the Indian government took several hard steps to preemptively weaken the chances of riots by putting several local leaders under house arrest or preventive detention. As a consequence, despite a few hiccups, things went much better than expected and Kashmir has been gradually returning to normalcy.

4. The Ram Mandir Verdict

It’s a fact that the verdict was delivered by the Supreme Court but it’s also a fact that the government handled the situation remarkably well. It is for a reason that the verdict wasn’t delivered conclusively in favour of the Hindus despite the overwhelming evidence in all these years. It is only when a Hindutva government was elected with a thumping majority in two consecutive elections that the Judiciary received the confidence required to deliver a fair verdict.

Read: Dharma, Deva, Desha: Three phases of Ram Janmabhoomi movement, who decided Babri Masjid had to go and day of reckoning

It was another of the core issues in the BJP manifesto that was fulfilled during 2019 and really set the mood for bigger and better things. It was the end of a historic battle that has been waged for centuries and it came to an end during Narendra Modi’s tenure as Prime Minister. Although the verdict was delivered by the Supreme Court, the manner in which the government handled security matters post-verdict is worthy of commendation in its own right.

5. The Citizenship Amendment Act

The entire series of events, right from the tabling of the Bill to the passage of it and the events that followed, the CAA brought out into the open the fundamental contradictions that have plagued the Republic of India for all these years. Rationally speaking, there was nothing remotely radical about the law. The CAA was the fulfilment of sacred vows that were sworn when the state of India came into existence.

Read: Rahul Gandhi embarks on his deranged rant against NPR, NRC and CAA again: Here are 10 questions that he must answer

Jawaharlal Nehru knew it, Rajendra Prasad knew it, even Gandhi knew it. But it is testament to the spectacular mismanagement of the country by the Congress party that we have produced a generation of uncouth youth who are completely unaware of the oaths that were sworn when India was partitioned. The Hindus, Sikhs, Jains and Buddhists could come to India from the newly created Islamic State anytime they chose, they were told, and yet when decades later, the Indian government decided to honour its promise by granting them citizenship, the entire intellectual elite of this country had chosen to side with Islamic Extremists rather than the persecuted minorities from Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan.

Read: Indian Muslims do not stand to suffer due to the CAA-NRC combo: Here are the laws and guidelines explained

The government’s defence during the entire matter revealed that the BJP is firmly committed to the ideals of Hindutva. Home Minister Amit Shah again demonstrated his great ideological clarity and made it clear through his words that in his view and by extension, in the view of the Prime Minister, India is the natural homeland for Hindus across the world. That is the most fundamental ideological shift the country has witnessed since its inception.

Foundations for a New India

There is an age-old saying, a whole is greater than the sum of its parts. In addition to these five big decisions, the government took numerous other conspicuous decisions that made it clear that India had changed forever. All of these decisions ought to be viewed in their entirety as a Gestalt. These are not policy decisions but the decisions that were made in the manner in which the government and the ruling dispensation decided to conduct itself.

1. The Media Ignored

For instance, the manner in which the Government completely ignored the blackmail tactics of the mainstream media and the liberal establishment and remained steadfast in its path towards achieving their objective. The ruling dispensation did not give in to the bullying tactics of the liberal establishment, from both India and abroad, and went about doing what it set out to do without caring two hoots about those who did not care much about democracy but only ensuring that liberal policies are implemented regardless of who is in power. These tactics were put to rest. The current ruling dispensation does not care about what the liberal establishment has to say about them. The party of Hindutva was elected by Indians, a Hindutvavadi government is what Indians will receive.

2. The Street Veto Bluff

Secondly, and more importantly, the bluff of Islamic Extremists was called by the Modi government in the wake of the anti-CAA protests. The media was touting it to be a students’ revolution when, in reality, it was the Khilafat 2.0. Needless to say, the uprising was crushed by the government without mercy. Time and again, Islamic Extremists have attempted to hold the Indian government hostage by the often unsaid threat of violence. After the passage of the CAA and the NRC looming around the corner, vested interests attempted to grind India to a halt and bully the government into taking back the CAA-NRC juggernaut. The government did not budge.

Delhi, Uttar Pradesh and Karnataka were hit by mob violence for the longest period. In West Bengal, the violence was great but it fizzled out when they rampaging mobs were made to realize that it was only benefitting the BJP. In the two states and the national capital, the Police are under the control of BJP governments at the states and centre and the Police did what was necessary to quell the violence.

Read: Khilafat 2.0: How Useful Idiots in the media and political parties were fooled by Jamia students associated with the ‘blood brother’ of a banned Radical Islamic outfit

Yogi Adityanath, apart from the Home Minister, was one person who shined through the chaos. By the time the anti-CAA protests fizzled out, Islamic preachers were begging the administration for forgiveness and were voluntarily paying for the damage to public property, in addition to the notices that have already been served by UP Police. This was a great climb down from the “Ladke lengey Azadi” slogans and the chants of “Chheen ke lengey Azadi” that were raised during the protests.

3. New Equations with the West

The most significant, perhaps, is the manner in which the Indian government has stopped giving a damn about how the Western world perceives us. The clearest example of it was when MEA Jaishankar, in a manner that typifies the nonchalant arrogance that has become the hallmark of his interactions with the press, said casually that he had no intentions of meeting a US Congresswoman after saying that she had gotten basically everything wrong about what the Indian government was doing in Kashmir.

Read: No interest in meeting her: MEA S Jaishankar cancels meeting with US politicians over inclusion of anti-India Congresswoman

MEA Jaishankar has emphasized during his interactions with international institutions that the West needs to come to a new understanding with India. He has reiterated that the current ruling dispensations sees the world differently than previous governments and relates to it differently than them. He has also emphasized that the West and India, both, need each other and therefore, there was a need to develop a new understanding between the two.

A New Dawn

The Five Big Bang decisions of the Modi government combined with the manner it has conducted itself has set the tone for the coming decade. In many ways, the next decade could prove to be the most pivotal decade in the history of Independent India for generations to come. But when history books are written in the future, they will say that it was in 2019 that India was changed was forever.

The government was asked many difficult questions during the course of the year. But it took all of these questions and challenges head-on and came out with flying colours. The Opposition asked, “How far are you willing to go to implement your policy objectives?” “To hell and back,” the government replied calmly. “What are the sacrifices you are prepared to make for the sake of your Hindutva ideology?” “Whatever it takes.”

And as we stand on the verge of a New Year and with that, a new decade, 2019 truly has been the Dawn of a New Age.

Facebook blocks Radio Pakistan for spreading fake news on Kashmir and violating community standards on dangerous individuals and organisation

Social networking giant Facebook has blocked live streaming of Pakistan Broadcasting Corporation (PBC)’s Radio Pakistan over violation of community guidelines and spreading fake news on Kashmir. As per Facebook, it violated Community Standards on dangerous individuals and organisation.


As per Republic, Radio Pakistan was live-streaming fake news on ‘atrocities, curfew and military lockdown in Kashmir’ when Facebook realised that it was spreading fake news. Facebook then stopped the live streaming and blocked it. Facebook has not only blocked today’s live streaming but also removed several posts of Radio Pakistan which hailed terrorists like Burhan Wani and Zakir Musa and called them ‘martyrs’.

Radio Pakistan post on Zakir Musa’s ‘martyrdom’ removed by Facebook

Citing sources, Republic further added that Pakistan Army has set up fake news units and hired youth to make fake posts on Kashmir globally.

After Marxist Irfan Habib heckled Arif Mohammad Khan, Aligarh Society plays victim, claims ‘democratic dissent’ being stifled

At the 80th session of Indian History Congress, the Marxist Historian Irfan Habib had shamefully tried to heckle the Kerala governor, Arif Mohammad Khan and disrupt his speech. The left-leaning historian had tried to physically disrupt the speech of the governor, even as people in the audience shouted slogans against the governor. Now, the Aligarh Society of History and Archaeology (ASHA) has issued a statement in support of the Leftist Historian and playing the victim by claiming that his ‘right to democratic dissent’ was stifled.

The statement issued by the Aligarh Society claims that “soon after the Presidential Address delivered by Professor Amiya Kumar Bagchi (Kolkata), Mr Arif Muhammad Khan was called to deliver his speech. Instead of delivering an address the Honourable Governor started not only defending the CAA but also accusing all those who did not agree with CAA as “Pakistani” agents who never had the courage to criticise the wrong policies of the Gandhi family, specially Jawaharlal Nehru and Indira Gandhi. Along with all those who opposed CAA as ani-nationals, he went along to suggest that this could not be understood by the people of Kerala who never experienced the partition of India and creation of Pakistan”.

Read: Not Abul Kalam Azad, quote Godse: Leftist historian Irfan Habib tries to physically heckle Kerala Guv Arif Mohammad Khan over CAA

At this point of time, there is no video of the Kerala governor calling anyone a Pakistani agent. According to tweets posted by the official Twitter account of the Kerala governor, Irfan Habib had made some points on the CAA. After that, the governor tried to address those points during his address, but at that time Habib rose from his seat and tried to physically stop the governor from speaking.

The note says that while Governor Arif Mohammad Khan was delivering his speech, 2 research ‘students’ of JNU stood up with placards that read ‘No to CAA’ Along with them a few senior professors from CAS Department of History AMU and Delhi University stood up asking the Governor to “refrain from what he was doing”. The statement further claims, “Soon a host of researchers from JNU, AMU, DU and Jamia were detained. Fortunately, they were all released within an hour. An attempt was also made to detain a senior professor from Aligarh”.

Read: NDTV journalist defends the shameless heckling of Kerala governor Arif Mohmmad Khan by leftist historian Irfan Habib, calls Khan “opportunistic”

It then claims that Professor Irfan Habib, who was there on the dais in the capacity of the outgoing member of the IHC (Indian History Congress), got up to ask VC Kannur University, Professor Gopinath Ravindran to “stop what was happening”. It was at this time that ASHA claims that Habib was manhandled by the Kerala governor’s security detail.

The statement issued by ASHA further played the victim and said that they condemn the “stifling of democratic dissent” and “laud Professor Irfan Habib, Padma Bhushan and Professor Emeritus (AMU) for raising his voice against the rising intolerance to democratic norms”. The statement also said that Kerala Governor Arif Mohammad Khan was claiming an attack on him instead of apologising the Irfan Habib. “The members of Aligarh Society of History and Archaeology [ASHA] also condemn the stifling the democratic voices and our right to protest. We further condemn the way the Constitution of India is being effectively dismantled through Acts like CAA”, the statement said.

Read: After Kerala governor Arif Mohammad Khan supports CAA, Congress revokes invitation to him to attend the commemoration of former CM

Interestingly, the statement makes no mention of the fact that Leftist Historian Irfan Habib had indulged in downright shameful conduct by objected to Arif Mohammad Khan quoting Maulana Abul Kalam Azad. He had said that the governor should quote Nathuram Godse instead. To this, the governor had replied, “is Maulana Azad your personal property? He is ours.” The historian even pushed the governor’s ADC and security officer, who had tried to prevent him from reaching Khan.

Further, it is difficult to fathom how ASHA has failed to realise that the Governor is bound to have a security detail and Irfan Habib breaching that security will be dealt with appropriately.

This vilification of Arif Mohammad Khan, however, comes as no surprise. KK Muhammad, the Archeologist who was vilified and attacked by Leftists and Islamists for his findings in the Ram Mandir case had written in his autobiography that anyone who did not agree with Irfan Habib was automatically branded as a Hindutvavadi. In the book, Muhammad details how he was hounded by Irfan Habib because he was not ‘secular enough’.

Read: Easier to convince a dacoit than a communist: Read what Dr KK Muhammad said at Mangaluru Lit Fest

According to Swarajya, in the forward to his book, Prof. M G S Narayanan too writes about Prof. Habib. According to Prof. MGS, Prof. Habib has poisoned not just history but culture and social life by his narrow groupism, nepotism and treachery. At the same time, he writes that Prof. Habib is a hard-working person but crafty. His group would threaten, cheat and would be part of various intrigues. Anyone who criticised this group would be branded a Hindutvawadi and a communalist. That the Left cabal has now trained its guns against Kerala governor Arif Muhammad Khan now comes as no surprise.

Aligarh: Jamia Urdu registrar and OSD accused of threatening to kill an employee if he does not convert to Islam, case registered

Kamal Singh, who works as gardener supervisor at Jamia Urdu Aligarh, has accused the educational institute’s registrar and officer on special duty (OSD) of trying to forcefully convert his religion to Islam. He has even alleged that his salary was stopped because he refused to convert.

Jagran report (image: @umanathtrip on Twitter)

A case has been registered in Quarsi police station in Aligarh regarding the same. As per Jagran report, Kamal Singh Sodhi has accused the ODS Farhat Ali as well as Registrar Samunraja Naqvi of forcing him as well as his wife Meena Devi to convert his religion to Islam. In September, his salary was also stopped, he alleged.

As reported by News18, the registrar and the ODS of Jamia Urdu Aligarh even threatened that he will be fired. The duo allegedly even threatened to get the couple killed should they not convert to Islam.

A complaint has been registered and police is currently investigating the case.