Gujarat’s land has always been known for entrepreneurship and sharp commercial acumen. When then Chief Minister Narendra Modi sowed the seeds of Vibrant Gujarat in 2003, few could have imagined that this initiative would one day grow beyond the regional level to attract investments worth trillions of rupees.
The Vibrant Gujarat Regional Conference(VGRC), held in January 2026 at Marwadi University in Rajkot, has clearly demonstrated that Gujarat’s growth engine is no longer confined to metro cities alone; it has now expanded deep into the hinterlands of Saurashtra and Kutch.
It is noteworthy that the 10th edition of the Vibrant Gujarat Summit was held in 2024, during which MoUs worth Rs 26.33 lakh crore were signed across 41,299 projects. Taken together, the pre-summit and summit phases attracted investments exceeding Rs 45.2 lakh crore across 98,540 projects, with the potential to generate 81 lakh jobs. The 11th edition was scheduled for 2026. However, to focus on regional development, the government decentralised the summit through regional conferences. Under this approach, the first VGRC was held in Mehsana, North Gujarat, in October 2025, followed by the Saurashtra–Kutch VGRC in Rajkot on 11–12 January 2026. The state-level summit will now be held in 2027.
At the first VGRC held in October, 1,212 MoUs were signed, attracting investments worth ₹3.24 lakh crore. The recently concluded Saurashtra–Kutch VGRC focused on sectors such as the blue economy, green startups, shipbuilding, ceramics, and tourism. Rajkot—already an engineering and auto-parts hub—was connected to international markets through this summit. The conference was held at Marwadi University, located on the Rajkot–Morbi Highway, where six exhibition domes and a central innovation hall were set up across a 55-acre area. Prime Minister Narendra Modi inaugurated the conference on 11 January.
Key outcomes after the conclusion of VGRC
This was the first conference covering 12 districts of Kutch and Saurashtra. It saw participation from representatives of 24 countries, more than 4,000 entrepreneurs, over 450 exhibitors, and 29,000 registrations. In addition, more than 2,200 B2B and B2G meetings were held. As a result of the conference, 5,492 MoUs worth ₹5.78 lakh crore were signed.
{Thread Alert}
Vibrant Gujarat Regional Conference (Kutch & Saurashtra) turned vision into action, ✅5,492 MoUs worth ₹5.78 lakh crore, ✅29,000+ registrations, ✅4,000+ entrepreneurs and ✅Global participation from 24 countries.
Sharing details in a post, Deputy Chief Minister Harsh Sanghavi stated that the following MoUs were signed:
₹381 crore across 5 MoUs in auto, engineering, and allied sectors
₹1,460 crore across 5 MoUs in the ceramics manufacturing sector
₹1,650 crore across 3 MoUs in aerospace and defence manufacturing
₹0.22 crore across 4 MoUs in skill development and MSME capacity building
₹261 crore across 13 MoUs in the blue bio-economy (biofuels, functional foods, nutraceuticals)
₹9 crore across 2 MoUs in green AI data centres and deep-tech sectors
At the valedictory ceremony, Cabinet Minister Jitu Vaghani noted that during the first Vibrant Gujarat summit in 2003, only 80 MoUs worth ₹66,000 crore were signed. In contrast, this regional conference alone, held in Rajkot, concluded with 5,492 MoUs worth ₹5.78 lakh crore. These figures, along with participation from multiple countries and the unwavering trust in Prime Minister Narendra Modi, speak for themselves. He further stated that initiatives such as Atmanirbhar Bharat, Startup India, and Make in India are being realised under the Prime Minister’s leadership, directly benefiting Gujarat’s entrepreneurs and industrial units.
Strategic rationale behind the government’s focus on Saurashtra and Kutch
The Gujarat government is deliberately promoting Saurashtra and Kutch due to their immense potential. Gujarat has a 1,600-kilometre-long coastline, over 70% of which lies in Saurashtra and Kutch. This coastline serves as India’s gateway to global markets such as Dubai, Europe, and Africa. Compared to Ahmedabad or Surat, Saurashtra—and particularly Kutch—offers vast tracts of land, which are essential for mega projects such as solar parks and steel plants.
Addressing the conference, Minister Arjun Modhwadia stated that entrepreneurship runs in the veins of the people of Kutch and Saurashtra. The government is now taking this spirit to the global stage by providing infrastructure and policy incentives. Morbi accounts for 90% of India’s ceramic production and ranks second globally. At the VGRC, this sector was showcased as a special zone, and MoUs worth Rs 1,460 crore were signed during dedicated seminars. These MoUs are not limited to setting up new factories; they are also aimed at technology upgradation.
As a result, advanced technology, automation, energy efficiency, and waste recycling will reduce production costs, enhance global competitiveness, and boost exports. The sector, which currently employs 10,000–12,000 people (around 60% women), will be further strengthened. New ceramic parks will drive value-added products and modern manufacturing.
From engineering to green energy
Rajkot’s engineering industry is now being integrated with “new-age technologies.” Traditionally known for pumps and auto parts, Rajkot is set to benefit from the development of a semiconductor hub, enabling local MSMEs to become part of high-tech chip manufacturing supply chains. This will allow engineering graduates to secure high-paying jobs in Rajkot itself rather than seeking opportunities abroad.
Additionally, Gujarat has set a target of developing 100 GW of renewable energy capacity by 2030. MoUs signed in this sector will significantly contribute to green hydrogen, solar, wind, and ocean energy, enhancing energy security, reducing carbon emissions, and creating thousands of skilled jobs—especially in rural areas. Rural electricity stability will improve, and new income streams will emerge. Investments in green hydrogen are expected to position Kutch as a future “energy capital.”
The coastlines of Dwarka, Somnath, and Porbandar are being developed for cruise tourism, which will boost local handicrafts, transport, and hospitality sectors. Ports in Kutch and Saurashtra serve as major gateways for India; increased exports will reduce transport costs and enhance global trade participation, promoting the blue economy and green shipping. Modern cold storage and processing units in the fisheries sector will also raise fishermen’s incomes.
Investments worth Rs 5.78 lakh crore are expected to generate approximately 12–15 lakh direct and indirect employment opportunities, curbing migration for jobs. Industrial growth will drive the development of new highways, railway connectivity, and smart cities. Rajkot’s new international airport will further accelerate this growth. Notably, whenever a large plant is established, ancillary MSMEs emerge around it, providing expanded markets for small entrepreneurs in Rajkot and Jamnagar.
The government is also establishing new skill universities and centres of excellence aligned with industry needs, ensuring that youth are job-ready. In that sense, Gujarat is no longer just vibrant; it is now regionally vibrant.
India is edging closer to its goal of becoming a “Naxal-free” nation by 31st March, with the Centre rolling out a detailed 10-point plan to make sure that areas cleared of Left-Wing Extremism remain peaceful, The Economic Times reported.
The new strategy goes beyond security measures and focuses on development, better livelihoods and everyday governance, while also stepping up action against Maoist networks in urban areas.
Officials familiar with the discussions said the plan is meant for the post-Left-Wing Extremism phase and focuses on stabilising districts that have lived through years of violence. It brings together faster delivery of government schemes, a change in security strategy and tougher steps to break the money and support systems of Maoist groups.
The roadmap was discussed during recent high-level meetings involving senior officials from the Centre and states.
From battlegrounds to stable districts
One of the most important changes under the new approach is the shift in security thinking. Instead of treating these regions only as conflict zones, the Centre wants them to move towards normal administration and everyday peace. The idea is to ensure that once violence reduces, the gains are not lost because of weak governance or lack of development.
Officials say this change is crucial because many areas that were once strongholds of extremism still struggle with basic facilities. If everyday problems are not addressed, there is always a risk of unrest returning. The new strategy is designed to prevent that slide.
Why development still holds the key
The need for a strong development push was underlined during the Chief Secretaries’ Conference held between 26th to 28th December, 2025. Data shared at the meeting showed that poverty levels remain much higher in Left-Wing Extremism-affected districts compared to the national average.
While poverty across India stands at around 15%, it goes beyond 20% in LWE-hit areas. In districts such as Lakhisarai, Latehar, Malkangiri, Sukma and West Singhbhum, more than 40% of the population lives in poverty. These figures, drawn from 2019-21 data, explain why development remains central to the fight against Naxalism.
Most families in these regions depend on forest produce and rain-fed farming. Non-farm job options are limited, irrigation coverage is poor and access to markets is weak. Even where progress has been made in building roads and installing mobile towers, some villages remain difficult to reach.
Education and health gaps remain wide
Education and healthcare continue to lag behind in many affected districts. School dropout rates are high, especially after the primary level. In several schools, even basic facilities such as functional girls’ toilets are missing, making it harder for children, particularly girls, to continue their studies.
Health centres often struggle with staff shortages and limited facilities. Maternal care remains uneven, and infant and maternal death rates are higher than the national average. Clean water and sanitation are also ongoing challenges in remote pockets. Financial literacy and access to skill training institutes remain limited, reducing job options for young people.
Security strategy gets a reset
One of the most significant changes under the 10-point plan is the shift in security handling. The Centre wants to gradually move away from a Central Armed Police Forces-led conflict response to a system where state police take the lead in maintaining peace.
The belief is that local police are better placed to understand community issues and build trust with residents. Over time, CAPF camps will be handed over to state police, marking a move from short-term control to long-term peace maintenance.
Alongside this, the Centre is pushing for a more responsive civil administration. District officials are expected to stay engaged with communities, address grievances quickly and ensure that government services reach people on time.
Government schemes reach the last mile
To close long-standing gaps, LWE-affected states have been asked to ensure full coverage of 137 central government schemes spread across 20 ministries. A special relaxation has been given to allow faster rollout, keeping in mind the challenges of working in remote and forested areas.
One key initiative is the faster rollout of the Swamitva scheme using drones. The aim is to provide clear land ownership records to every rural household. Officials say proper land records can reduce disputes, improve access to loans and give families a sense of security.
Focus on better livelihoods
Livelihoods form a major pillar of the post-LWE plan. Studies from the Bastar division highlight the scale of the challenge. Nearly 70% of households there earn less than ₹10,000 a month, with more than a third surviving on under ₹6,000. A large majority earn no more than ₹15,000.
The Centre now wants to raise average monthly incomes to ₹25,000-30,000. This will be done by widening livelihood options, encouraging group-based work, improving links to markets and bringing in technology where possible. Officials believe steady incomes are one of the strongest safeguards against the return of extremism.
Breaking the money chain
Along with development and governance, the plan takes a tough stand on the financial and logistical networks linked to Maoist groups. There is a proposal to hand over major LWE-related cases to the National Investigation Agency, with coordinated action by the Enforcement Directorate, the CBI and the Income Tax Department.
States have been encouraged to set up special courts to ensure strong investigations and faster trials. Better coordination between states is also planned to curb the supply of weapons and funding. A new policy to regulate tendu leaf collection, a known source of Maoist income, is also being worked on.
Urban networks under watch
The Centre has also made it clear that its focus is not limited to rural and forest areas. A key target of the plan is the Maoist support system operating in urban centres. Officials say such networks often work quietly from within institutions, providing ideological, legal or logistical support.
The strategy includes identifying such front organisations through surveillance and investigation, followed by swift legal action. The aim is to ensure that extremist influence does not rebuild itself in cities even as rural areas stabilise.
How the Modi Government changed the fight against naxalism
Over the past decade, the government led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi has steadily pushed Naxalism to the margins by combining firm security action with visible development work. Instead of treating the issue only as a law-and-order problem, the focus shifted to improving daily life in remote districts.
Roads, electricity, mobile connectivity, housing, toilets and banking services were expanded in areas that were once cut off. Welfare schemes were pushed aggressively, reducing the space for extremist groups to influence everyday life.
Targeted security operations cleared core Naxal zones, while outreach programmes, health camps and job schemes helped rebuild trust with local communities. As governance improved, violence dropped sharply and the geographical spread of Naxalism shrank.
With the new post-LWE plan, the Centre now wants to lock in these gains for good. By focusing on development, dignity and long-term peace, the government hopes to ensure that areas once known for conflict move firmly towards stability, growth and a normal way of life.
In a step to boost its air defence capabilities, India is set to discuss a deal with France for acquiring 114 fourth and fifth-generation Rafale jets. The contract, valued at around ₹3.25 lakh crore, is to be negotiated in a high-level Defence Ministry meeting scheduled for this week.
The deal, which is set to be one of India’s largest aircraft procurement deals, will include the delivery of 12-18 Rafale jets to India in fly-away condition, while the rest will be made in India. This will take the total number of jets in the Indian Air Force’s Rafale fighter squadron to 176. Currently, the Indian Air Force operates with 29 fighter squadrons, while the sanctioned critical strength of fighter squadrons is 42. This is the reason that India is making efforts to expand its fighter squadron to set up a robust air defence.
Last year, in April 2025, India contracted with France for the procurement of 26 Dassault Rafale-M (Marine) jets for $7.4 billion. After France itself, India is the only country with both the naval and the air force variants of Rafale jets. The latest negotiations with France regarding Rafale jets come at a time when the US and Russia have offered India their 5th-generation fighter jets, the F-35 and the Su-57, respectively.
A deal to boost India’s domestic defence manufacturing
The agreement, once finalised, would bolster India’s aim of strengthening domestic manufacturing by allowing for the domestic production of the jets with over 30% indigenous content. However, this is lower than the required 50%-60% indigenous content under the Make in India deals. Additionally, India has requested that France enable the integration of Indian weapons and other indigenous systems into the jets. However, the source codes of the jets will remain with France only.
In June 2024, Tata Advanced Systems Limited (TASL) signed a deal with Dassault Aviation of France for the induction of domestically manufactured Rafales into the Indian Air Force and the Army. The contract was an important step towards enhancing India’s defence self-reliance, as it facilitated the flow of modern defence technologies into the country. Besides, the TASL is in the process of designing and constructing an exclusive manufacturing unit in Hyderabad to tailor Rafale jets as per the strategic requirements of India. The facility will be capable of producing 24 fuselages (main body of the aircraft) annually. The first unit from the facility is expected to be delivered by 2028.
Moreover, apart from the MRO facility to come up in Hyderabad, an MRO facility is also being established in Uttar Pradesh. All these facilities will cumulatively bring 60% of strategic Rafale manufacturing into India in terms of value.
Why Rafale jets?
The Indian Ministry of Defence received the proposal prepared by the Indian Air Force for the 114 Rafale jets a few months ago. After getting the Defence Ministry’s approval, the proposal will need clearance from the Cabinet Committee on Security. The fresh efforts of India for the acquisition of the Rafale jets come after the highly effective performance of the jets against Pakistan during Operation Sindoor. The jets managed to comprehensively beat the Chinese PL-15 air-to-air missiles using their Spectra Electronic Warfare suite.
India strengthening air defence amid rising regional threats
Amid the rising regional threats to its national security, India has been firming its air defence by expanding its fighter squadron with high-performance, advanced aircraft. As part of its plans for air defence modernisation, India has already placed orders for 180 LCA Mar 1A jets and is planning to induct indigenous fifth-generation fighter jets in large numbers after 2035.
Under the proposed deal, France is also planning to establish a maintenance, repair and overhaul (MRO) facility for the M-88 engines, fitted in Rafale jets, in Hyderabad. A firm has been set up by Dassault Aviation, the maker of Rafale jets, to oversee the maintenance of French-origin fighter jets. Several Indian aerospace firms are expected to be part of the domestic manufacturing of Rafale jets.
India-France Defence Partnership
The current negotiations follow the 38th India–France Strategic Dialogue in New Delhi last week, which was co-chaired by India’s National Security Adviser Ajit Doval and Emmanuel Bonne, diplomatic adviser to French President Emmanuel Macron. At the dialogue, Doval and Bonne discussed defence cooperation, regional and global security issues, technology partnerships, space collaboration, and civil nuclear energy. They also reviewed progress on joint defence projects and discussed new opportunities for co-development and co-production.
The India-France defence partnership has rapidly expanded over the last decade. The defence cooperation between the two countries extends from Rafale fighter jets and includes submarines, helicopters, and joint military exercises. The current deal for Rafales is an example of India’s balanced approach with respect to defence cooperation and domestic defence manufacturing.
In a significant step towards dismantling the Islamic jihadist activities of the Muslim Brotherhood, the US government, on 13th January, declared the Lebanese, Egyptian, and Jordanian chapters of the Muslim Brotherhood as a Foreign Terrorist Organisation and a Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT). The move comes after, in November 2025, US President Donald Trump signed an executive order directing his administration to initiate the process of designating specific chapters of the Muslim Brotherhood as FTOs and SDGTs.
In a press statement, Marco Rubio, the Secretary of State, said that the designation of the Egyptian, Jordanian, and Lebanese chapters of the Muslim Brotherhood as FTOs and SDGTs is a step towards “President Trump’s commitment to eliminate the capabilities and operations of Muslim Brotherhood chapters that pose a threat to the United States.”
Today, we are designating the Lebanese, Egyptian, and Jordanian chapters of the Muslim Brotherhood as terrorist groups. Under President Trump's leadership, the United States will eliminate the capabilities and operations of Muslim Brotherhood chapters that threaten U.S. citizens…
“The Department of State is designating the Lebanese Muslim Brotherhood as a Foreign Terrorist Organisation and a Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT), and the group’s leader, Muhammad Fawzi Taqqosh, as an SDGT. Concurrently, the Department of the Treasury is designating the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood and Jordanian Muslim Brotherhood as SDGTs for providing material support to Hamas,” Rubio said.
“These designations reflect the opening actions of an ongoing, sustained effort to thwart Muslim Brotherhood chapters’ violence and destabilization wherever it occurs. The United States will use all available tools to deprive these Muslim Brotherhood chapters of the resources to engage in or support terrorism,” the Secretary of State added.
Founded in 1928 in Egypt by Hassan al-Banna, a teacher and Islamic scholar, the Muslim Brotherhood or Ikhwan al-Muslimin began as a Sunni Islamist movement that pivoted to violent Jihadist activities later. Over the decades, the Muslim Brotherhood has become a transnational Islamic terror network. Its objective is the establishment of Sharia law in various countries through violent and non-violent methods.
The Muslim Brotherhood has spawned several national chapters and affiliates globally, maintaining a non-violent and socio-political façade while secretively orchestrating or supporting Islamic terrorism.
Formally designating the Muslim Brotherhood as a terror group has always been difficult for the US government. The organisation is decentralised, with different branches operating in multiple countries, many of which function independently. Because of this structure, legal experts and intelligence officials in Washington have often found it challenging to apply a blanket terrorist label to the entire movement.
To tackle this, specific chapters of the Muslim Brotherhood with proven links to Islamic terrorism are targeted and designated as terror groups.
Lebanese Muslim Brotherhood
In the recent designation, the US government declared the Lebanese Muslim Brotherhood, also known as al-Jamaa al-Islamiyah, the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood, and the Jordanian Muslim Brotherhood as FTOs and SDGTs.
The Lebanese Muslim Brotherhood, also known as the al-Jamaa al-Islamiyah, was established in the 1960s as a branch of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood. It functions mainly among Lebanon’s Sunni Muslim populace. The outfit has been involved in Lebanese politics and even held parliamentary seats. The Islamist outfit also ran educational and healthcare services; however, beyond the façade of charity, LMB has been involved in violent activities.
In fact, the LMB has a military wing known as the al-Fajr Forces (Dawn Forces), also known as Quwwat-al-Fajr. Many leaders of LMB, including Fathi Yakan and Abdallah Teriaqi, had become very close to Hezbollah, and by 2006, they defected and established the Islamic Action Front, a Sunni jihadist outfit aligned with a Shia counterpart.
Although the force was largely inoperative, during the 2023 Israel-Lebanon border clashes, al-Fajr reactivated itself and launched rockets into northern Israel. Al-Fajr also coordinated with Hezbollah and Hamas. In March 2024, al-Fajr jihadis were allegedly planning to carry out terror attacks against Israel, although the Israeli Defence Forces swung into action before the Lebanese Muslim Brotherhood terrorists could execute the attack.
The LMB secretary general, Muhammad Fawzi Taqqosh, has actively worked to push for a formal alliance with the Hezbollah-Hamas axis. Reports say that al-Fajr, in its present form, has over 1,000 active jihadis.
Within the LMB, there are two rival factions, one loyal to Qatar and Turkey, and the other aligned with Iran-backed Hezbollah and the Axis of Resistance. A 2021 internal election within the al-Jamaa al-Islamiyah resulted in the strengthening of the camp supporting an alliance with the Axis of Resistance, especially Salah al-Arouri, who was killed by Israel in January 2024 in Beirut. Since the Israel-Hamas war erupted in October 2023, Israel is reported to have killed more than 15 al-Fajr jihadis for their active violent support to Hamas against Israel. In fact, al-Fajr operates as Hamas’s Lebanese military command.
Highlighting how despite claiming to have distanced itself from violence, the Muslim Brotherhood continues to actively support violent Jihadist activities, the US Treasury Department said, “Although the Muslim Brotherhood, to which Hamas has pledged allegiance, claims to have renounced violence, the Muslim Brotherhood branches designated today continue to promote, incite, and glorify terrorism that directly threatens the interests of the United States and its allies.”
Jordanian Muslim Brotherhood
Designated as an SDGT by the US Treasury Department in January 2026, the Jordanian Muslim Brotherhood (JMB) was founded in 1945 by Abdel Latif Abou Qura. Initially, the Jordanian monarchy, led by young King Hussain I, approved and tolerated the JMB to quell dissent through charitable work rather than radicalism, to erect a counterbalance to secular Arab nationalists, and as a source of stability. However, this pragmatic and transactional alliance proved to be a Frankenstein’s monster for the monarchy as the Jordanian Muslim Brotherhood grew stronger and pivoted from being a pillar of the monarchy to an enemy of the state.
Later in 1989, the JMB floated its political party, named Islamic Action Front, after Jordan underwent political liberalisation. In 1992, the Islamic Action Front became a licensed party. Although inextricable, the IAF and the JMB maintained separate leadership structures. The JMB-IAF, though it remain operational as opposition elements in Jordanian polity, has faced crackdowns amidst regional tensions, particularly during the 2011 Arab Spring and the Israel-Hamas War.
While the Jordanian Muslim Brotherhood maintains an almost non-violent presence in Jordan, it has been linked with support to violence in the name of the ‘Palestinian cause’. The state of Jordan faced pressure from its Arab allies to ban the JMB. However, it remained reluctant to do so despite viewing their activities with suspicion and wanting to contain and control their activities.
However, with time, the Jordanian state shifted its position and in 2015, the government announced that it no longer recognises the Muslim Brotherhood as a legal organisation. It also refused to renew JMB’s license. It rather approved a new outfit named the Muslim Brotherhood Association, which the government deemed more reformist, moderate, and absolutely Jordan-focused.
In 2020, Jordan’s top court ordered the dissolution of the Muslim Brotherhood. However, this ruling could not be implemented due to the government’s deliberate inaction. Not to forget, JMB’s political wing, Islamic Action Front, is quite strong in the country, having won 31 out of 138 seats in the September 2024 elections.
In May 2025, Jordan officially banned the original Muslim Brotherhood (JMB) and seized its assets in the country. This decision came right after the Jordanian authorities arrested 16 people, including JMB members, over an alleged sabotage conspiracy. While the JMB was outlawed, the Islamic Action Front was not subjected to a ban, though the latter’s offices were raided and its future remains uncertain.
What made the Jordanian Muslim Brotherhood ‘eligible’ for designation as an SDGT was its operatives collaborating with foreign terror entities for manufacturing rockets, explosives, and drones, in addition to recruiting new jihadis. The US Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) says that the elements with connections to the Muslim Brotherhood in Jordan and abroad have “facilitated this work by raising money through illegal means.”
“The Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood and the Jordanian Muslim Brotherhood are being designated pursuant to E.O. 13224, as amended, for having materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to or in support of, Hamas,” the US Treasury Department said.
Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood
Another jihadist terrorist entity designated as a Foreign Terrorist Organisation (FTO) and Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT), is the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood (EMB), which can be called the parent body of all Muslim Brotherhood chapters worldwide.
The Muslim Brotherhood, or Ikhwan al-Muslimin, was founded in 1928 in Egypt by Hassan al-Banna, a teacher and Islamic scholar. The Islamist outfit’s foundation was based on the premise of anti-Western colonialism and the supposed erosion of Islamic values in the post-Ottoman world. Al-Banna launched the Muslim Brotherhood as a pan-Islamist movement which focused on charity and Islamist advocacy.
In its early years, the Muslim Brotherhood or Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood filled gaps left by weak and nonchalant governments by building schools, hospitals and mosques for the poor and illiterate people in Egypt while also preaching Islam and ‘Tawhid’ (Allah’s oneness and supremacy) as some antidote to secularism and imperialism. The motto of the Muslim Brotherhood makes abundantly clear that, though it may not have initially been linked to violence, ‘Jihad’ has always been its way.
The Brotherhood’s motto says, “Allah is our objective; the Prophet is our leader; the Quran is our law; jihad is our way; dying in the way of Allah is our highest hope.”
By the 1930s, the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood had gained thousands of members and entered politics as well. However, the Islamist outfit had a paramilitary wing called the Secret Apparatus or al-Nizam al-Khas. This wing carried out political assassinations and jihadist violence. In 1948, the Secret Apparatus members assassinated Prime Minister Mahmoud El Nokrashy Pasha for banning the Islamist outfit. In 1949, al-Banna was murdered by the Egyptian Secret Police in retaliation for Pasha’s murder.
The members of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood’s Secret Apparatus used to undergo heavy physical and military training. They were trained to use firearms and carry out underground operations. Emphasising deception and secrecy (Taqqiya), the Jihadists belonging to the Apparatus infiltrate and subvert political parties, armies, intelligence, media, educational institutions and even NGOs.
While in non-Muslim countries like the UK, violence may not be the go-to tactic of the Muslim Brotherhood. They rely on using media, politics, educational institutions, and charities for the furtherance of the Islamic jihadist agenda.
In 2012, EMB won the elections and picked Mohamed Morsi as President. However, in 2013, a military coup led by then-General Abdel Fattah el-Sisi ousted Morsi. The Islamist outfit was banned and declared a terrorist organisation in Egypt.
The Muslim Brotherhood continues to be seen as a threat to political stability by many authoritarian governments in the Middle East and North Africa. Recently, Texas Governor Greg Abbott announced that the Muslim Brotherhood, including the Council on American-Islamic Relations, would be considered “foreign terrorist and transnational criminal organisations.”
Notably, the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Bahrain, and Russia have already designated the Brotherhood as a terrorist organisation. Jordan banned the group in April 2025 after arresting people linked to the movement who were accused of plotting attacks using rockets and drones. In January 2026, the UAE discontinued funding for its citizens interested in studying in the United Kingdom (UK) after the UK refused to ban the Islamic terror outfit.
The Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood also inspired Maulana Abul Ala Maududi’s Jamaat-e-Islami in the 1940s. Banned Islamic terror outfits like the Student Islamic Movement of India (SIMI) and Popular Front of India (PFI), both of which have been involved in Jihadist attacks against Hindus and are working on plans to turn India into an Islamic nation, draw inspiration from Muslim Brotherhood tactics.
Before going after the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood, the US already designated many of EMB’s violent offshoots as FTOs and SDGTs, including Hamas
The US has previously designated various Islamic outfits for their links with the Muslim Brotherhood. These MB violent offshoots include the Egyptian Islamic Jihad (EIJ), Gama’a al-Islamiyya (IG), Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ), Hamas, Harakat Sawa’d Misr (HASM), and Liwa al-Thawra. All of these violent jihadist offshoots of the Muslim Brotherhood were founded in the 1970s and 1980s.
The Egyptian Islamic Jihad carried out violent attacks on high-level Egyptian government officials and was responsible for the assassination of Egyptian President Anwar Sadat in 1981. Ayman al-Zawahiri led this outfit before fully merging with al-Qaeda in June 2001. The US designated EIJ an FTO in 1997 and an SDGT in 2001.
Gama’a al-Islamiyya (IG), which aimed to establish an Islamic state in Egypt, had its leader, Omar Abd al-Rahman, known as the “blind Sheikh,” jailed in the US on a life sentence for his role in the World Trade Centre bombing.
Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) operates to obliterate Israel and has been involved in various attacks on Israel, including the Hamas-led massacre of Israeli people on 7th October 2023. This Muslim Brotherhood proxy was designated an FTO by the US in 1997 and an SDGT in 2001.
Palestinian Islamic terror group Hamas also traces its links with the Muslim Brotherhood, and was designated an FTO in 1997 and an SDGT in 2001. In addition to the countless attacks it has carried out against Israel since its foundation in 1988, Hamas committed the October 7 massacre in Israel, brutally killing over 1200 people, and kidnapping over 240 people.
OpIndia earlier reported about the Palestinian Islamic terror group Hamas claiming the country of Israel as a ‘Waqf’ property in its 1988 Covenant or Charter and vowing to continue Jihad against Jews until the last one of them is killed. Hamas enjoys the support of the Muslim Brotherhood and joined the Palestinian terror group in carrying out airstrikes against Israeli civilians and military after the October 7 2023, massacre.
Through its 2017 document, Hamas tried to distance itself from the Muslim Brotherhood, apparently, to improve its relations with Egypt. Hamas also softened its stance on fighting the Jews by distinguishing between Zionists and Jews. The Islamic terror group’s actions since then have exposed their duplicity. The indiscriminate killing of Jews on 7th October 2023 laid bare Hamas’s hypocrisy and hatred for Jews.
Formed in 2015, Harakat Sawa’d Misr (HASM) is another Egyptian offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood, dedicated to overthrowing the Egyptian government. In 2016, HASM attempted an assassination of Egypt’s former Grand Mufti Ali Gomaa. In 2017, HASM attempted the assassination of Egyptian National Security Agency officer Ibrahim Azzazy. In 2019, HASM jihadis carried out a car-bomb explosion near a hospital in Cairo, killing 20 people. The US designated HASM as an SDGT in 2018 and an FTO in 2021.
Designated an SDGT in 2018, Liwa al-Thawra is another major EMB offshoot. Jihadis belonging to this outfit carried out the October 2016 assassination of Brigadier General Adel Ragai, commander of the Egyptian army’s Ninth Armoured Division, outside his home in Cairo. In 2017, Liwa al-Thawra bombed a police training centre in the Egyptian city of Tanta.
The implications of the Muslim Brotherhood Egypt, Jordan and Lebanese chapters getting designated as FTOs and SDGTs
In consequence of the designation of the Jordanian, Egyptian, and Lebanese chapters of the Muslim Brotherhood getting designated as FTOs and SDGTs by the US, all property and interests in property of the designated entities and persons, in the US or in the US’s possession, would be blocked and reported to the Treasury Department’s OFAC.
Furthermore, any entities that are owned, directly or indirectly, individually or in the aggregate, 50 per cent or more by one or more blocked persons would also be blocked.
In addition, all transactions by US persons or within (or transiting) the US that involve any property or interests in property of blocked persons shall be prohibited unless authorised by a general or specific license issued by OFAC. Violations of sanctions will invite civic penalties by the OFAC.
Relevant excerpt taken from the US Treasury Department’s press release published on its website on 13th January 2026.
Moreover, financial entities and other individuals may face sanctions for engaging in certain transactions or activities involving designated or otherwise blocked persons.
“The making of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services by, to, or for the benefit of any designated or blocked person, or the receipt of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services from any such person,” the US Treasury Department said, adding that engagement with designated persons and groups may also invite secondary sanctions on participating foreign financial institutions.
On 13th January, the National Board of Examinations in Medical Sciences (NBEMS) revised the qualifying cut-off scores for NEET PG 2025 after the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare directed a lowering of qualifying percentiles. The move has triggered intense discussion online after it emerged that candidates with negative marks under the SC, ST and OBC categories are now eligible to participate in counselling.
In the official notice, NBEMS stated that the minimum qualifying percentile for counselling in the third round of NEET PG 2025–26 had been reduced across categories in accordance with directions issued by the Union health ministry.
What the revised qualifying criteria state
As per the revised criteria, the qualifying percentile for General and EWS candidates has been reduced from the 50th percentile to the 7th percentile, with the corresponding cut-off score lowered to 103 out of 800. For General persons with benchmark disability, the qualifying percentile has been reduced from the 45th percentile to the 5th percentile, translating to a cut-off score of 90.
Source: NBEMS
For SC, ST and OBC candidates, including persons with benchmark disability in these categories, the qualifying percentile has been reduced from the 40th percentile to the 0th percentile. The corresponding cut-off score has been fixed at minus 40 out of 800, owing to the negative marking scheme followed in the examination.
NBEMS has clarified that there is no change in the NEET PG 2025 ranks that were declared on 19th August 2025. Furthermore, the revision only determines eligibility to participate in counselling.
Eligibility remains provisional
The notice further stated that candidature remains purely provisional and subject to fulfilment of eligibility conditions as per the NEET PG 2025 information bulletin. Aggregate marks obtained in MBBS professional examinations or the Foreign Medical Graduate Examination, as declared by candidates in their application forms, will be verified against original documents at the time of admission.
NBEMS also cautioned that if incorrect information has been used to resolve a tie in ranking, the concerned candidate’s candidature would be cancelled. Any use of unfair means during the examination would attract penal action by NBEMS, the Medical Counselling Committee, or the admitting authority.
Why the cut-offs were lowered
The government took the decision to lower the qualifying cut-offs amid concerns over a large number of vacant postgraduate medical seats. According to officials, despite around 2.4 lakh candidates appearing for NEET PG 2025, higher cut-offs had resulted in thousands of seats remaining unfilled after multiple rounds of counselling.
There are around 65,000 to 70,000 postgraduate medical seats in India. Officials indicated that allowing a significant number of seats to remain vacant could affect the functioning of teaching hospitals, particularly government institutions that rely heavily on resident doctors for clinical services and academic work.
The revision came at a time when the Indian Medical Association had also written to Union Health Minister JP Nadda seeking a “rational revision” of cut-offs to prevent large scale wastage of training capacity.
What netizens are saying
The revised cut-offs have drawn mixed reactions on social media. Users are debating whether the move should be viewed purely as an administrative measure or as a signal of dilution in academic thresholds.
Some users have contextualised the decision. They have emphasised that the revised cut-offs only expand eligibility for counselling and do not guarantee admission. Tech policy commentator Himanshu Jain said in a post on social media platform X that while it is accurate that candidates with minus 40 marks can now participate in counselling, the broader context is often missing from online discussions.
🩺 NEET-PG 2025 | CLARIFICATION
Yes, the –40 marks counselling claim is real — but the context matters.
• NBEMS (as per MoHFW) lowered cut-offs on 13 Jan 2026 to avoid ~9,000 PG seats going vacant • Eligibility ≠ guaranteed admission • Such ranks usually translate to… pic.twitter.com/9CQb1GCSOD
He pointed out that NBEMS lowered the cut-offs primarily to avoid nearly 9,000 PG medical seats going vacant. Furthermore, eligibility for counselling should not be seen as assured admission. Candidates qualifying at such low cut-offs generally end up in non-clinical or low demand branches, or in high fee private institutions that are often left unfilled by higher ranked candidates.
According to Himanshu, the policy decision was focused on capacity utilisation and not on altering passing standards. He pointed out that NEET PG functions as a ranking examination for candidates who have already completed MBBS and cleared university level assessments.
However, several other users raised concerns over the implications of allowing candidates with negative scores to enter the counselling process.
Dr Dhruv Chauhan, National Spokesperson of the Indian Medical Association JDN, stated, “I do not know how to react to this, but now candidates scoring minus 40 marks are also eligible to get a NEET PG seat. In simple language, if you have money or belong to a specific category, then even if you slept in the exam and scored negative marks, you are equal to someone who topped or worked hard.”
I don’t know how to react on this , but now candidates scoring “Minus – 40”marks are also applicable to get NEET PG seat .
In simple language if you have money or specific category then even if you slept in the exam and scored negative marks = someone who topped /worked hard. pic.twitter.com/6O9r1o0NIJ
Social media commentator Amit Kilhor questioned the lowering of the percentile for counselling and called for the establishment of minimum standards for medical admissions while tagging Union Health Minister JP Nadda.
Policy commentator Anshul Saxena wrote, “In NEET-PG 2025, candidates with scores as low as –40 out of 800 are allowed to participate in PG counselling. The merit cutoff has fallen so low that a negative score is now considered qualifying. A serious crisis in academic standards.”
In NEET-PG 2025, candidates with scores as low as –40 out of 800 are allowed to participate in PG counselling.
The merit cutoff has fallen so low that a negative score is now considered qualifying.
In a post on X, founder of DAMS-Alpha Dr Sumer Sethi wrote, “Merit shouldn’t have negative value. NEET PG cut-off at -40 isn’t relief it’s dilution. Seat filling ≠ standards. A negative cut-off makes “qualifying” meaningless.”
Merit shouldn’t have negative value. NEET PG cut-off at -40 isn’t relief it’s dilution.
The revised NEET PG cut-offs have highlighted an ongoing debate around how postgraduate medical seats should be filled. On one hand, the authorities have suggested that the decision was taken to prevent seats from remaining vacant and to ensure hospitals, especially those run by the government, have enough resident doctors. On the other hand, the eligibility of candidates to appear in the third round of counselling with very low or negative scores has led to questions from doctors and the public.
The issue has brought forward the challenge of balancing seat utilisation with expectations around minimum academic standards in postgraduate medical education, and this discussion is likely to continue as the counselling process commences in coming days.
The United Kingdom is preparing for a new clinical trial in January involving medications that prevent puberty. A group of over 200 kids who believe they might be transgender, possibly as young as eight years old, would participate in the research. The development occurred after drugs were banned for gender treatment last year, owing to concerns expressed by an extensive evaluation regarding the lack of clinical data regarding their safety for minors.
According to reports, the new trial has received public funding and has been submitted for ethics approval. A staggering £11 million budget has been allocated, and nearly 220 youngsters under the age of 16 who are going through puberty are expected to engage in the trial. The information was submitted by the researchers from King’s College London (KCL), who will look into the effect of the drugs on their physical, social and emotional health.
Professor Emily Simonoff asserted that young people and their parents seeking aid for gender distress “tell us that they don’t know what to do – they look at the information that’s out there, and they don’t know what’s best for them,” reported BBC (British Broadcasting Corporation). She is the study leader and professor of child and adolescent psychiatry at the institution.
Simonoff further claimed, “We are looking very much at the balance between, possibly, benefits for mental health and quality of life, and any possible risks or harms.” She added that it will involve keeping an eye on the physical well-being of the individuals. This is also the first study to examine the effect on brain development.
Cass Review and the truth about puberty blockers
Drugs called puberty blockers or puberty-suppressing hormones (PSH) are used to postpone or avoid puberty. They were utilised on young people with gender dysphoria. However, doctors can now only administer them to patients under the age of eighteen as part of a research study due to the uncertainty around their safety. The details were brought to light by the Cass Review into gender care.
Dr Hilary Cas,s who headed the research, pointed out, “We don’t have good evidence” that puberty blockers are suitable to take to “arrest puberty,” while talking to the BBC. The former President of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH) stated that the initial clinical trial had been expanded to a larger group of youth before the trial’s findings were disclosed.
The paediatrician also noted, “It is unusual for us to give a potentially life-changing treatment to young people and not know what happens to them in adulthood, and that’s been a particular problem that we haven’t had the follow-up into adulthood to know what the results of this are.”
Cass suggested creating a puberty blocker trial as an element of a “full program of research” as she observed that gender medicine was “built on shaky foundations” and “an area of remarkably weak evidence.” She emphasised, “My review uncovered a very weak evidence base for benefits from the use of puberty blockers for children and young people with gender dysphoria. In fact, some children had more negative than positive effects.”
“However, given that there are clinicians, children and families who believe passionately in the beneficial effects, a trial was the only way forward to make sense of this,” she added. Hence, Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, outlawed puberty blockers after the four-year independent review concluded that the data supporting their use was “remarkably weak.”
The government then implemented an indefinite prohibition on the medications being prescribed to children and young persons who are unsure about their gender identity, either privately or through the National Health Service (NHS).
“Sale and supply of puberty blockers via private prescriptions for the treatment of gender incongruence and/or gender dysphoria to be banned indefinitely in the UK for under 18s. It follows a targeted consultation and advice on patient safety from the independent Commission on Human Medicines and the Cass Review,” declared the Department of Health and Social Care.
The fresh trial is on the cards
A study named “Pathway” has been approved by the UK to purportedly ascertain “how the NHS can best support children and young people with gender incongruence,” per the World Health Organisation’s diagnostic manual. The subjects are expected to meet specific criteria. All of them should have reached puberty, but not be above 16. They must also fulfil certain requirements and undergo extensive medical and psychological testing before the commencement of the process.
A group of specialised NHS doctors need to have a complete overview of their health before approving their candidature. The youngsters also have to demonstrate that they have a sufficient grasp of the possible consequences of using puberty blockers alongside the permission of their parent or legal guardian to gain consent. They will also receive continuous psychological assistance.
The researchers intend to start the trial on one group immediately and a second group after a year. The drugs will be offered for two years to one group and one year later to the other. The kids in these groups shall be selected at random.
For girls and boys, puberty usually begins at age 11 and 12, respectively. However, the researchers stated that there would be no minimum age to take the medications. The experiment will focus on factors including brain development, bone density and long-term mental health and wellness.
Only patients under specialised care from NHS Children and Young People’s Gender Services will be eligible for the trial. There will be another study to compare the brain health of persons given puberty suppression with those who were not.
According to the research team, the trial has received ethical approval and is poised to begin soon. Five to six children will be recruited each month,th and the preliminary outcome should be accessible in about four years. Moreover, a bigger observational study with 3,000 kids is going to probe various forms of assistance and their efficacy.
Interestingly, the trial protocol was reportedly declined to be made public by the Health Research Authority (HRA), which is in charge of ethics approvals for such initiatives in the nation.
Pathway sparks outrage, warning of legal action
The trial has generated massive controversy, with opponents even threatening legal action. Keira Bell, who sued the Tavistock gender identity clinic in 2020 after receiving cross-sex medication and puberty blockers as a teenager, has threatened legal action if the trial is not terminated right away.
The NHS closed the Tavistock Clinic, a facility for services related to gender identity development, after an inquiry discovered that it was unsafe for children. Bell regretted her decision and expressed that the staff should have challenged her more about the critical life-choice.
She has conveyed that it is “disgusting” to administer these drugs to kids after being barred because of their perils. “Children are essentially going to be harmed from this trial,” she voiced in an interview with the BBC. She added that it could impact fertility and sexual function while disclosing how she was “extremely angry” about her personal experience with puberty blockers.
Bell and fellow activist James Esses, a psychotherapist,t even issued legal letters to Streeting and medical research institutions in relation to the matter. “Some of the children who are going to be taking part in this trial are not even old enough to open a current account or open a Facebook profile,” Esses mentioned.
The Health Research Authority (HRA) and the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Authority (MHRA) have received legal letters from the campaigners. The clearance for the trial has been granted by them. The South West London and Maudsley NHS Trust, King’s College London, NHS England and Streeting have also been contacted over the concern.
The trial provokes widespread disapproval
The trial has likewise drawn condemnation from two former Tavistock Clinic members. Susan and Marcus Evans, who worked for the Tavistock and Portman NHS Trust, demanded that the trial be put on “immediate halt.” They argued, “The stakes are too high and the lessons from recent failures too fresh to ignore,” in a nine-page letter and asked Streeting to halt investing in “this shallow, harmful medical trial.”
The two stressed, “There is huge value in learning more about the ongoing longer-term outcomes for them before we impose puberty blockers on a new cohort of children.” They recommended that studies on those who have already taken puberty blockers be restarted.
“The trial design is incapable of answering the important questions about risk that have been raised – to cognitive function, bone health, fertility and long-term health. It is unethical as it will be exposing children to risk for no clear benefit,” ex-psychiatrist and Tavistock whistleblower Dr David Bell told The Telegraph.
Associate sociology professor Dr Michael Biggs of the University of Oxford speculated that the impending trial might turn into a recurrence of the Tavistock blunder, “this time with even more children being subjected to an unethical experiment.”
Dr Louise Irvine, co-chairman of the Clinical Advisory Network on Sex and Gender, condemned the HRA, complaining that its “supervision, regulation and accountability process was totally inadequate” and the previous experiment “failed to do its job.” She added, “The world is watching” this time.
Former education secretary Sir Gavin Williamson signed a letter written by independent MP Rupert Lowe accusing the move to proceedofs caving in to political pressure. The letter outlined, “We cannot and must not repeat the catastrophic failures of the Tavistock era, and we cannot allow twisted ideological pressure to override our duty to protect children.”
Canterbury MP Rosie Duffield remarked that she could not “believe I came to Parliament to have to point out that we should never use experimental/irreversible drugs in trials on children under 13 which halt their puberty.” She stepped down as the Labour whip in protest last year.
Reform UK leader Nigel Farage even sent a letter to Prime Minister Keir Starmer, asking him to pay heed to the concerns and roll back the trial. He wrote, “The Pathways trial represents state-sponsored child abuse, dressed up as research, and is wholly incompatible with the NHS duty to safeguard children and do no harm.”
Conservative Party leader and former Equalities Minister Kemi Badenoch reiterated Cass Review’s results that treating kids required “a holistic approach” and voiced, “Puberty blockers have never been certified as a safe or effective treatment for children with gender distress, and it is hard to believe there could ever be an ethical way of trialling these irreversible drugs for this purpose.”
Anti-trial petitions attract support from JK Rowling and Richard Dawkins
On the one hand, legal action is imminent accompanied by huge protest over the matter, with endorsement from various politicians, while on the other hand, campaigners have launched online petitions that have already garnered significant backing from both netizens and prominent British figures such as author JK Rowling and biologist Richard Dawkins, thereby intensifying pressure on the government to address the gravity of the situation.
A petition titled “Memorandum of Understanding on the Role of Puberty in Adolescent Development” by Genspect, which outlined the dangers associated with the forthcoming clinical trial and demanded its cancellation, was signed by Dawkins.
Professor @RichardDawkins has signed our call to cancel the NHS puberty-blocker trial.
He joins hundreds of researchers & clinicians who warn that stopping healthy puberty in distressed young people cannot be justified.
The petition stated that each child has a right to an open future with “the freedom to enter adulthood as whole as reasonably possible – physically, emotionally, and cognitively – and to have the opportunity to assume adult responsibilities and fully participate in society.” It added that “medically suppressing puberty to relieve gender-related distress infringes upon this right.” The petition described the puberty blockers for gender-distressed minors as “ethically unjustified, medically unnecessary and potentially harmful.”
It mentioned that this natural process has been hampered by the adoption of puberty blockers, stressing, “Approximately 98% of minors starting puberty blockers proceed to cross-sex hormones, with many also undergoing irreversible surgeries, contradicting claims that these interventions merely pause development. Puberty suppression poses considerable risks to physical health and presents significant uncertainties regarding its impact on cognitive and psychosocial development.”
Esses, who serves as a spokesperson for Sex Matters, launched a similar petition named “Cancel the clinical trial into puberty blockers & safeguard vulnerable children.” The cause received support from Rowling, who also encouraged others to back the petition,n which is inching closer to 125,000 signatures.
I've signed. This is an unethical experiment on children who can't give meaningful consent.https://t.co/zHvzVIyq7g
Launched on the official Parliament website on 8th January, the petition experienced a spike in popularity after the Harry Potter author shared it. A petition must gather 100,000 signatures to qualify for discussion in the Parliament.
“Most people really, truly hate the idea of harming children in the name of ideology,” commented Helen Joy,ce who is director of advocacy, Sex Matters. “The government needs to take note – people loathe the idea of the puberty blocker trial and won’t forgive anyone who is involved,” she warned.
Across one weekend, 100,000 people signed the petition to stop the puberty blockers trial.
“I’ve spent over half a century in medicine, and I certainly do not approve of using puberty-blocking medicine on healthy young children. It is dangerous and wrong,” pointed out Professor Karol Sikora, a consultant oncologist, also spoke of her satisfaction over the positive response to the petition.
Furthermore, Labour MP Jonathan Hinder expressed, “The speed of this petition reaching 100k signatures shows the strong public opposition to this.” He contended that his party’s “voters oppose puberty blockers by a margin of four to one. Wes Streeting must think again.”
Conclusion
This trial has encountered considerable flak spanning the political spectrum and including concerned citizens from all walks of life for legitimate reasons. There are substantial reservations that Pathway could mirror the Tavistock issue, but on a grander scale, affecting a greater number of vulnerable lives.
The Bayswater Support Group, which assists 600 families with gender-confused children, expressed that it was “inconceivable” that the NHS was geared up “to re-open a back door to further vulnerable children taking medically unnecessary and potentially irreversible drugs.”
“All the way through, I’ve had to weigh up the risk of harm to children and young people, which is why it’s not straightforward, why I’ve leaned on clinical advice from people far more qualified than us to make these decisions. But this is not easy, and it is not a comfortable decision, and it’s one that I wrestle with daily,” Steerling has stated amid the mounting attacks regarding Pathway.
The trial would be “watched like a hawk” to make sure that “everything is done absolutely by the book,” vowed Shadow Health Minister Dr Caroline Johnson, who is a paediatric consultant. However, the guarantees have not managed to mitigate the criticism stemming from real concerns.
More importantly, the medications inflict enduring and irreversible harm, especially on young patients who are already at a sensitive age. Adolescence is also a crucial period for the rapid acquisition of new cognitive skills, and therefore, the possible effects of puberty blockers on brain growth and function have been a major source of concern. The same apprehensions have been put forward,d including by those who underwent these operations and were left to cope with their repercussions, underscoring the negligence on the government’s part.
The youngsters are relegated to the status of guinea pigs, gs disregarding their future and well-being, while millions are wasted to devastate lives just to validate a warped perception of gender identity and liberalism, instead of offering genuine help to resolve the problem at hand.
Within a span of six days, a series of “exclusive” reports by Reuters journalist Saad Sayeed have projected Pakistan as an emerging force in the global arms market. In his reports, Saad claimed Pakistan is in talks with multiple nations for multi-billion-dollar defence deals spanning South Asia, the Middle East, and Africa. Interestingly, Saad’s back-to-back Pakistan-centric bylines came almost a year after his last byline had appeared on Reuters.
Source: Reuters
These reports, published at a questionable pace and in a uniform tone, have raised questions not only over the claims themselves but also over the sourcing practices and narrative building. Interestingly, Pakistan, a country that is neck-deep in loans and facing massive inflation, is being projected as a rising arms supplier in a region where India is increasing its dominance in military equipment exports.
Saad’s Muck Rack profile suggests his location is Hong Kong and the bio on the website says he is based in Islamabad.
Source: Muck Ruck
A rapid burst of defence exclusives
The sequence began on 7th January with two reports. In the first report, Saad claimed that Pakistan was in talks with Bangladesh over a defence pact involving JF-17 Thunder fighter jets and Super Mushshak trainers. The second report suggested that Saudi Arabia was considering converting existing loans into a potential $4 billion JF-17 deal.
Both reports written by Saad foregrounded the aircraft’s “combat-proven” credentials. They cited the India-Pakistan conflict of May 2025, which took place after India initiated Operation Sindoor to eliminate terrorist camps inside Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir (PoJK). Operation Sindoor was a military response to the Pahalgam terrorist attack, in which 26 innocent Hindu tourists were killed by Pakistan-sponsored terrorists.
Saad claimed that the jets Pakistan is trying to “sell” to Bangladesh and Saudi Arabia are combat-tested against India, a claim the hostile nation has failed to prove with evidence. He framed the negotiations as part of Islamabad’s efforts to stabilise its economy through defence exports.
In the Bangladesh report, Pakistan’s defence minister Khawaja Asif was quoted claiming that a surge in defence orders could make International Monetary Fund (IMF) assistance unnecessary within months. The statement appeared without analytical challenge or economic counterweight.
Notably, in the past few years, Pakistan has gone to the IMF multiple times with a begging bowl, seeking financial assistance to support its drowning economy. The IMF imposed several restrictions to issue loans. Apart from the IMF, Pakistan has also taken loans from China, Saudi Arabia, and other nations.
On 9th January, another “exclusive” was published in which Saad claimed that Pakistan was nearing a $1.5 billion arms deal with Sudan, involving aircraft, drones, and air defence systems. Interestingly, when India launched Operation Sindoor, Pakistan’s “air defence” could not stop even a single missile, and India not only managed to neutralise several terrorist camps but also attacked military installations after Pakistan retaliated. On the other hand, India’s air defence successfully neutralised a swarm of drones and missiles during the conflict.
On 12th January, yet another “exclusive” report was published in which Saad claimed that Indonesia was in advanced talks to acquire more than 40 JF-17 jets and Shahpar drones. Four exclusives in under a week, all reinforcing the same trajectory.
Dependence on anonymous and retired military sources
Across the reports written by Saad, the sourcing patterns remain strikingly consistent. Key details are attributed to unnamed officials described as “sources close to the military” or “sources with knowledge of the matter”. Furthermore, the reports were supplemented by commentary from “retired Pakistani air marshals” who were “informally” briefed on defence affairs.
Official confirmations, where cited, were limited to acknowledging meetings or discussions, not the scale, financial structure, or finality of the alleged deals. The substantive claims rest almost entirely on these unnamed or semi-detached figures.
When it comes to defence-related reporting, anonymity is common. However, the repeated reliance on similar categories of sources, without named independent analysts or dissenting assessments, raises questions about verification and balance.
A closed loop of internal citations
Another notable feature is the dense web of self-referencing within Reuters’ own coverage, especially to reports written by Saad himself. Each new article cited earlier reports as evidence of Pakistan’s growing defence footprint.
The Indonesia report points back to the Sudan, Saudi, and Bangladesh pieces. The Sudan article references the Saudi and Bangladesh talks, along with an earlier Libya deal. The Saudi and Bangladesh reports cross-reference each other. While some of the reports were written by Saad, co-authored with Mubasher Bukhari in the Sudan report or Ananda Teresia in the Indonesia report, others were written by Ariba Shahid and Asif Shahzad, who have produced hundreds of Pakistan-centric reports.
This internal citation loop is risky as it creates the appearance of corroboration, even when the sources behind the actual stories remain largely unchanged. Such circular reinforcement is often used to create a narrative that, in reality, does not exist, and in this case, it appears to have been done to position Pakistan as a key player in the defence sector in the Indian subcontinent.
A consistently favourable framing
Across all four reports, Pakistan’s defence ambitions were framed as economically transformative and strategically successful. Potential downsides received limited attention.
The Sudan report briefly noted the country’s civil war but focused on how Pakistani arms could “revive” the Sudanese army, offering little engagement with the ethical implications of supplying weapons amid a humanitarian crisis.
In the Indonesia-centric article, the authors acknowledged Jakarta’s wider fighter jet considerations but positioned the Pakistani option as competitively advanced. However, this was done without comparable scrutiny of performance claims or geopolitical trade-offs.
The cumulative effect is a narrative that foregrounds Pakistan’s gains while downplaying risks associated with arms proliferation, sanctions exposure, and regional instability.
Editorial responsibility and trust
These patterns sit uneasily with Reuters’ own Trust Principles, which emphasise accuracy, independence, and restraint in the use of anonymous sources.
Exclusivity may drive attention, but on sensitive defence matters with global implications, repetition without diversification of sources risks blurring the line between reporting and amplification.
The question is not whether Pakistan seeks to expand its defence exports. That is well established. The more pressing issue is whether journalism, especially from a global wire service, should appear to advance that narrative with such confidence, speed, and uniformity, without visibly testing the claims it carries.
In today’s time, information itself shapes geopolitics. How a story is built matters as much as the story itself, as it can affect decision-making processes. If these reports have been written to boost Pakistan’s position as a key player in the defence sector, it is worth exploring on whose behest this is being done, especially when India has positioned itself as a major defence exporter in the last decade.
Even as efforts are being made to improve bilateral relations between India and China, territorial claims continue to cause friction between the two countries. The fresh tensions are triggered by China’s construction of infrastructure, including a new road, in the Shaksgam Valley. While China is asserting that the region is a part of its ‘sovereign territory’, India has called this a blatant violation of its territorial integrity.
India and China engage in a war of words over territorial claims on the Shaksgam Valley
Days after China made a delusional claim that the Indian state of Arunachal Pradesh is a Chinese territory named ‘Zangnan’, China provoked India again by asserting its illegal claim over the Shaksgam Valley, which is a part of Pakistan-occupied-Kashmir (PoK) illegally ceded to China in 1963.
In response to a question during a press meet on 12th January, Mao Ning, the Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson, said, “First of all, the territory you mentioned is part of China’s territory. The Chinese side has been implementing infrastructure and construction activities in its own territory. China signed a border agreement with Pakistan in the 1960s, which determined the borders between the two countries as an authority for Central Asia as their sovereign state in the 1970s.”
Regarding India’s objections to the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, which passes through the Indian territory illegally occupied by Pakistan, Ning said, “You mentioned China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, as an initiative to promote local economic development and improvement. The border agreement between China does affect its position on Kashmir, and China’s position remains unchanged in this regard.”
#BREAKING: China provoked India yet again, claiming Indian territory as their own. Chinese Foreign Minister Spokesperson has rejected India's claim to the Shaksgam Valley in Jammu & Kashmir.
"The territory you mentioned belongs to China. It’s fully justified for China to conduct… pic.twitter.com/HY2yBekBZ7
China’s provocative remarks come after India rejected China’s “efforts to change the ground reality in the Shaksgam Valley”. New Delhi stated that it reserves the right to take requisite measures to protect its interests in the region.
During a press conference on January 9, Randhir Jaiswal, the spokesperson of the Ministry of External Affairs, stated that India has never recognised the illegal and invalid 1963 Sino-Pakistan Agreement, under which Pakistan ceded the Shaksgam Valley to China. He added that India has also rejected the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), which passes through territory that is “forcibly and illegally occupied” by Pakistan.
“Regarding Chinese infrastructure buildup via CPEC, as also in the Shaksgam Valley, which is Indian territory. We have never recognised the so-called China-Pakistan boundary agreement of 1963. We have consistently maintained that the agreement is illegal and invalid. We do not recognise the so-called China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) either, which passes through Indian territory that is under forcible and illegal occupation of Pakistan,” the MEA spokesperson said.
The MEA spokesperson reiterated India’s position that the entire Union Territories of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh are “an integral and inalienable part of India.”
“We have consistently protested with the Chinese side against attempts to alter the ground reality in the Shaksgam Valley. We further reserve the right to take necessary measures to safeguard our interests,” he said.
China has been building infrastructure in the Shaksgam Valley over the years
Various media reports claim that around 75 kilometres of a 10-meter-wide road has already been constructed by China in the Shaksgam Valley, while further construction continues. Earlier, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) built a 36-kilometre stretch of the road. With the continuous construction of this road, China is inching closer to India’s Siachen.
Satellite Imagery shows that this road is connected to two Chinese military posts outside the Shaksgam Valley. One of the could be the headquarters of the PLA unit operating in the area. The road holds significance as it lies in the Trans-Karakoram Tract region, which is historically a part of Kashmir, and the entire Jammu and Kashmir, including the PoK and the Shaksgam Valley, ceded illegally by Pakistan to China, belongs to India.
Satellite images captured by the European Space Agency in 2024. Source: IndiaToday
Back in 2021, the illegal authorities in the Pakistan-occupied Gilgit-Baltistan announced plans for constructing a new road connecting Muzaffarabad to Mustagh Pass, which sits on the Pakistan border with the Shaksgam Valley. It was reported that this road would be connected with Yarkand in Xinjiang, meaning that the road would likely pass through the Shaksgam Valley to link with China’s national highway G219.
While the road may have been constructed for the transportation of minerals like Uranium mined in Pakistan-occupied Gilgit-Baltistan, China and Pakistan can use the road for military manoeuvres in the face of a full-fledged conflict with India.
In a significant development, 🇨🇳 road has breached the border at Aghil Pass (4805 m) and entered the lower Shaksgam valley of Kashmir, 🇮🇳 with the road-head now less than 30 miles from 🇮🇳 Siachen
This permanently answers the question of Shaksgam for 🇮🇳
Notably, the road in question enters the Aghil Pass. This pass has historically been Kashmir’s frontier with Tibet. During the India-China border negotiations in 1960, the Indian side led by J. S. Mehta, Director, China Division in the Ministry of External Affairs, told the Chinese side, “The official maps of the Government of India, including the one attached to the 1907 edition of the Imperial Gazetteer of India and the political maps published by the Survey of India showed this area in Indian territory.”
“The official maps of the Government of India, including the one attached to the 1907 edition of the Imperial Gazetteer of India and the political maps published by the Survey of India showed this area in Indian territory. Official Chinese maps published in 1917, 1919 and 1923 also showed this area as a part of India,” the Indian side pointed out back in 1960.
Relevant excerpts taken from the India-China Official’s Negotiations -1960 document.
Shaksgam Valley: Pakistan ceded to China the territory that never belonged to it
The Shaksgam Valley is a remote, high-altitude area in the Karakoram mountain range, extending approximately 5,180 kilometres. The Valley lies in the north of the Siachen glacier and holds immense strategic significance given its proximity to key passes and its role in PoK with China’s Xinjiang. While the 1963 Sino-Pakistan Agreement is deemed the root of the Shaksgam Valley’s disputed status, the issues go back to 1947.
Before the partition of India on Islamic lines in 1947, the Shaksgam Valley was a part of the princely state of Jammu and Kashmir ruled by Raja Hari Singh. This region fell under local chieftain Mir of Hunza’s suzerainty. Hunza acknowledged the Hindu Maharaja’s authority. Historical evidence indicates that the Shaksgam Valley, along with the adjacent Raskam Valley, was included in Jammu and Kashmir’s boundaries. Even the British surveys in the late 19th and early 20th century recognised it as such. Although China made occasional claims relying on vague historical links with the Qing dynasty, these were not formalised.
After India’s partition and the birth of Pakistan in 1947, Pakistan-backed tribal invaders attacked Jammu and Kashmir, triggering the first India-Pakistan War. Amidst the war, Maharaja Hari Singh signed the Instrument of Accession on 26th October 1947, formally integrating the entire Jammu and Kashmir, including the Shaksgam Valley, into the Indian Dominion.
Pakistan, however, occupied a major portion of northern Kashmir during the conflict, including the areas that gave access to the Shaksgam Valley. Since this occupation was illegal, the entire region, including the Shaksgam Valley, remains Indian territory under international law.
There is a prevalent misconception that China-Pakistan relations became strong only after Pakistan and China joined hands for the illegal CPEC. However, Pakistan has long been cajoling China, with the ‘India containment’ goal being the unifying factor. Contrary to the prevalent narrative, China-Pakistan relations encompass six decades of military cooperation, economic and diplomatic alignments, the 1963 agreement on Shaksgam Valley, the onset of nuclear cooperation in the 1970s, Gwadar’s transfer in 2013, and the official launch of the CPEC.
In the aftermath of the Sino-Indian War in 1962, Pakistan seized the opportunity to bolster ties with China. On 2nd March 1963, China and Pakistan signed the Sino-Pakistan Frontier Agreement. Under this agreement, Pakistan ceded control of the Shaksgam Valley to China in exchange for border adjustments in other areas. This agreement, however, was conditional, stating that the ceded territory would be subject to final resolution in any future India-Pakistan settlement on the Kashmir issue.
Aside from being illegal, this agreement was deeply flawed, rather dishonest. How could China take control of the Shaksgam Valley, integrate it into its Xinjiang province, while also claiming that the territory will be subject to final resolution on Kashmir? Hypothetically, if India and Pakistan agree on Kashmir, and the Shaksgam Valley is decided to be returned to India, will China, after investing heavily in infrastructure there, just hand over the strategically significant Valley to India?
India has consistently rejected the 1963 Sino-Pakistan Agreement on the grounds that Pakistan illegally occupied the parts of Jammu and Kashmir now called PoK, and thus had no legal authority to negotiate or cede the territory that belongs to India. Since the Shaksgam Valley was a part of Jammu and Kashmir at the time of accession, Pakistan’s control over PoK is an illegal occupation. Islamabad had no locus standi to enter into bilateral agreements regarding Indian territory with China. It must not be forgotten that Mir of Hunza recognised the authority of Maharaja Hari Singh, and the Maharaja legally and wilfully ceded the entire Jammu and Kashmir to India.
In 1949, the PoK government signed the Karachi agreement with the then Government of Pakistan, wherein all the land rights of Gilgit-Baltistan were passed on to Pakistan. The agreement reportedly was signed by Mushtaq Ahmed Gurmani (Minister of Kashmir Affairs), Sardar Mohammad Ibrahim Khan (President of so called ‘Azad Kashmir’) and Chaudhary Ghulam Abbas.
In this agreement, the so-called ‘Azad Kashmir’ handed over the entire administration of Gilgit-Baltistan to Pakistan (which gave away part of the region to China). It is from this region that Pakistan handed over 5000 Square kilometres (the Shaksgam valley) to China. In fact, Sardar Ibrahim later revealed that his signatures were forged by Muhammad Din Taseer. Soon after the signing of the Karachi Agreement, Ibrahim was removed from office.
Be it the occupation of PoK or the ceding of the Shaksgam Valley, Pakistan has historically been an illegal occupier, with no legal standing to enter into any agreement with any country regarding the entire Jammu and Kashmir region. Thus, China’s control over the Shaksgam Valley and its infrastructure construction there is illegal.
King George Medical University (KGMU), Uttar Pradesh, is recognised for its research and treatment of various diseases. However, the emergence of Islamic radicalism within its walls has recently come to public attention, followed by the incident involving a Hindu doctor who faced harassment from Dr Rameezuddin Naik and accused him of love jihad.
The layers of this radical conspiracy are gradually being exposed. This case highlighted the suffering caused by the oppression of women, the machinations of Islamists such as Rameez and the reported protection offered by political entities like the Samajwadi Party (SP) and the Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP).
The origin of this matter traces back to Pilibhit, the native place of Rameezuddin and his father, Salimuddin, who then relocated to Khatima and took the surname “Malik.” The latter established a homoeopathic medical store and began to make connections with women through this. Salimuddin entered into marriages with four Hindu women, pressuring them to embrace Islam.
According to reports, Salimuddin maintained contact with a Qazi (Islamic judge) from Pilibhit and made regular trips to Deoband. The family witnessed a rise in religious extremism, and this animosity towards Hindus was inherited by Rameez. He excelled academically and was given admission to Agra Medical College in 2012. This marks a pivotal moment in the story.
“Islamic Medicos Meet” at Agra Medical College: A centre for religious conversion
Bhupendra Singh, a former doctor at KGMU, recalled that the event occurred in 2012 when Rameez joined the MBBS program at SN Medical College in Agra. At that time, the Samajwadi Party had assumed power in the state, emboldening the fundamentalists. Afterwards, meetings commenced at the institution in the name of “Islamic Medicos Meet” where Maulanas (Islamic clerics) and senior students began instructing juniors on how to approach Hindu girls. Additionally, there was a WhatsApp group named “Islamic Medicos” which they used to remain in touch with one another.
Bhupendra stated, “Many Muslim doctors trapped Hindu girls in romantic relationships at that college and later changed their religion. Rameez also had four or five close Muslim associates who were pursuing the same objective. One of his acquaintances at KGMU has been engaged in similar activities for the past year.”
He added, “Rameez also had the backing of his family. His father consistently told him to convert girls. He, with Salimuddin’s consent, would acquire American marijuana to showcase his sexual abilities to the girls. He would then assert that his sexual prowess was a gift from Allah.”
Links between KGMU and Zakir Naik
Bhupendra recounted that some medical students at KGMU formed contact with the fugitive Islamic radical, Dr Zakir Naik, in 2004. Over time, the practice of sporting beards and hijabs became prevalent in certain areas of the campus. During this timeframe, radicals linked to Zakir Naik’s ideology started to target Hindu girls. It is reported that Bachelor of Dental Surgery (BDS) students were particularly active in this regard.
“These students became confident during the regime of the Samajwadi Party and the Bahujan Samaj Party. Within three to four years, they turned seniors and commenced delivering speeches. This group remained active until around 2011-12,” Bhupendra mentioned. Medical students were being gathered and indoctrinated under the pretence of an “Islamic Medicos Meet” in Agra. A trend of Muslim doctors marrying Hindu girls was increasingly common at Agra Medical College.
It remains uncertain whether the groups at KGMU and Agra were interconnected or functioning independently. However, the involvement of Maulanas in medical colleges has become a norm. They began visiting Basti Medical College approximately a year ago. A first-year Head of Department in Bulandshahr Medical College was even accused of incorporating examples from the Hadith into his medical science lectures, a practice that had to be stopped after intervention from other faculty members.
The principal faced pressure to provide prayer facilities given the significant number of Muslim students in Bulandshahr. Nevertheless, their objective did not come to fruition after the protests. The presence of clerics is now prevalent in various medical colleges.
It has been revealed that an ex-principal of a medical college, who is currently the principal of a college in Purvanchal, is living with one of her Muslim students in a live-in relationship. She has decided to divorce her husband, and the legal proceedings are ongoing in court.
Conversion, love jihad racket has been going on at KGMU for years.
Bhupendra noted that KGMU served as a major centre for religious conversions almost 10-15 years ago. During that period, the Samajwadi Party and Bahujan Samaj Party were in power, and clerics from local mosques regularly arrived at the campus. However, things were stable for an extended time after the rise of the Yogi government. Now, these activities have reemerged in recent years.
He indicated that some Muslim nurses are deliberately fostering friendships between their Hindu colleagues and Muslim staff. These connections are steered towards physical closeness with time, followed by pressure for religious conversion. A female nursing staff member became Muslim and tied the knot in the Gandhi Ward of KGMU. The conversion has already taken place in another instance,e and arrangements for the wedding are reportedly in progress.
Likewise, a female contract worker has claimed that a middle-aged Muslim employee tried to manipulate her in the Microbiology department. There are accounts which suggested that individuals linked to Rameez’s gang are engaged in similar activities.
Mohammed Adil, an intern doctor at KGMU, was recently charged with raping a nursing student. He was in multiple relationships with Hindu girls, which he later ended to pursue a relationship with a much younger nursing student from his religion. He informed a Muslim female friend that his past affairs with Hindu girls should not be misconstrued, as he believed it was “good work.”
Students, professors and VC: Multiple faces of extremism at KGMU
The issue extends beyond students or junior doctors. It is disclosed that this extremist ideology has infiltrated KGMU at all levels, from the Vice-Chancellor down to the professors. Rameez’s case illustrated how this ilk pressurises the victims. The case came to light, and the female doctor’s father reached out to the Head of Department, Suresh Babu, on the same day his daughter attempted suicide.
However, Dr Sumaira Qayyum and Dr Wahid Ali, faculty members within the department, influenced Babu during a meeting. Afterwards, he declared that the young woman was mentally unstable and Rameez was a good person before the faculty and resident doctors. Furthermore, resident doctors were pushed to speak against her, but they declined to comply.
The father of the victim simply expressed that he did not wish for the accused to approach his daughter. He also had a meeting with the Chief Proctor, yet no decisive action was taken. Sumaira Qayyum and Wahid Ali were actively attempting to protect Rameez while the entire university administration continued to delay the issue. The Vice-Chancellor eventually formed a committee composed of her trusted associates when the pressure from Hindu organisations escalated.
Moreover, serious concerns were being raised about the administration. KGMU Vice-Chancellor Soniya Nityanand disregarded the rules by appointing a Muslim contractual employee as her advisor and improperly facilitating his transition to a permanent position, along with pension benefits. This person in the VC’s officeprotectso Muslim employees in the institution.
A large number of Muslim faculty members were appointed to the Critical Care department during the Samajwadi Party government. It is charged that rules are repeatedly violated in the department. It is even accused that Nityanand’s advisor discards complaint letters submitted by the Head of Department (HOD), who is a Hindu.
Bharatiya Janata Party spokesperson and attorney Prashant Umrao also remarked that the Vice-Chancellor’s office exhibits bias in favour of Muslims. “The office is actively endorsing Muslims. Whether it pertains to cases of jihad or radicalism, the Vice-Chancellor has taken a lenient stance in all instances,” he voiced.
#KGMU से बड़ी खबर है कि KGMU का वाईस चांसलर ऑफिस ही विशेष रूप से मुस्लिमों के समर्थन में लगा हुआ है। इसीलिए जेहाद के मामले हो या कट्टरपंथ के, सबमें वाईस चांसलर ने ढीला ढाला रवैया अपनाया हुआ है।
खबर आ रही है कि केजीएमयू के वाईस चांसलर प्रो सोनिया नित्यानंद ने अपने ऑफिस में एक…
Rameez’s association with Dr Parvez Ansari, who was nabbed in relation to the bomb explosion near the Red Fort in Delhi, has also been revealed. They had created a network aimed at converting female students at SN Medical College. The two stayed in the hostel together and devised plans to lure Hindu girls. They created a collective that comprised several clerics. Any new Muslim student who enrolled in the college was incorporated into their group.
The medical students and junior doctors would first establish friendships with their female classmates with the objective of conversion. They would meticulously observe their every move, remaining with them from the lecturetheatrer to the library. Once a level of intimacy was achieved, they would record compromising videos of the girls and then leverage the same to pressure them into converting to Islam. It has been reported that several female students fell victim to this conspiracy.
Whether politics is a circus or not could be a debate, but it is no exaggeration to say that there certainly are some clowns in it. Despite having their political career ended, and relevance lost, some retired politicians have a penchant for making random and outrageous statements to remain hog attention in the media and social media. There is no evidence that any special census has been conducted to know the number of clowns in Gujarat, but Shankarsinh Vaghela seems to have been trying to get his name included for a long time.
Former Chief Minister Shankarsinh has been largely disengaged from mainstream politics since he broke away from the Congress a few years ago. Vaghela no longer contests the election. It is a different story that before every election, he comes up with a new party, only to make a lot of noise and then calm down after the results.
After staying out of media headlines for a long time, Shankarsinh Vaghela has made a comeback, though a disastrous one. His social media has become more active than it was. If you look at Shankarsinh’s Facebook wall now, you will see two to five reels posted every day. Most of the clips have been taken from interviews he has given to various channels.
In most of his interviews, Shankarsinh Vaghela always targets the BJP, Modi-Shah, and the Gujarat government on different issues, and there is no objection to it. As the leader of the opposition, that is his job; however, now he has changed direction and taken a dangerous path. He has brought up the Godhra Hindu massacre in the middle to accuse the BJP, Modi, of polarising Hindu-Muslim communalism.
A clip of an interview with Shankarsinh on the Godhra Hindu massacre was posted four days ago (January 8) and contains extremely derogatory, factually incorrect, and absurd remarks.
Shankarsinh Vaghela said that the Sabarmati Express coach in Godhra was set on fire from the inside, not the outside, and the local Muslims did not even know what time the train was due to arrive and who was in which coach.
Not only this, Shankarsinh further argued that someone inside had set the box on fire. He further said that this was done so that the BJP could benefit in the elections by creating enmity between Hindus and Muslims.
Shankarsinh Vaghela said,
“Polarize Hindus, polarize Muslims, divide people religiously. What if you want to divide people religiously? There was a plan to do that, a conspiracy I would say, in this conspiracy, the coach of the kar sevaks was burnt in Godhra… It was not the time for these kar sevaks to return but to go to Ayodhya to do kar seva.”
“Who knew that they were going to return? Only an insider would know… How did the Muslims of Godhra know who was where? On which coach was it written that there were karsevaks in it? That coach was set on fire from the inside as a conspiracy. All of them were Hindus. Not only this, the plan was to wrap the dead body in white cloth and take it on a procession in Ahmedabad. What a monstrous plan this must have been. The coach was set on fire in Godhra because of the BJP’s coming to Gujarat. Not only this, the guards became eaters,” he added.
Even after two decades of independent investigation into what happened in Godhra, after the country’s Supreme Court gave its verdict, and after many Muslim criminals were punished, such reckless talk still happens. However, here the seriousness is even greater because it was not made by a common man but by the former Chief Minister of the state where this horrific crime unfolded two decades back.
Is Shankarsinh so stupid that he doesn’t know what really happened on February 27? Doesn’t he know what the Supreme Court’s verdict says about this incident? Doesn’t he know that the local Muslims, having planned and plotted the day before, had gathered stones and petrol and, the next day, when the Sabarmati Express arrived at the station, had locked two of its coaches from the outside and set them on fire? The answer is, of course, no.
Can a politician, a former Chief Minister, go to such lengths to insult the 59 Hindu Karsevaks who were killed in the massacre? To say that the coach was set on fire from inside isn’t that an insult to the Kar Sevaks, their sacrifices, their relatives, their families? Is Vaghela suggesting that the Hindu karsevaks decided to burn themselves to death to frame Muslims and spark a riot?
Who knew that the train would arrive at this time? – Such childish arguments have been made by Shankarsinh; however, doesn’t he know that the conspiracy was already hatched, and a meeting was also held in a guest house the previous day? ‘How did the Muslims know when the train would arrive and who was sitting in which compartment?’ Shankarsinh, who asked this question, does not know that these same Muslim criminals had already stored petrol, and all this has been proven in court. The court has already sentenced the criminals and rejected their bail.
The 59 Hindus who were killed in the burning of the Sabarmati Express coaches on February 27 were Kar Sevaks. Among them were 27 women and 10 children. Their ‘crime’ was that they were returning from the birthplace of their beloved after doing Kar Seva. They had to pay the price of their lives for demonstrating their faith. So that even after that, for years, they would continue to be accused of burning the coaches from within, or that some politician would just put the blame on these same Kar Sevaks to shine his politics and to gain the love of a particular community.
This reel of Shankarsingh has crossed 1 million views so far. It is our collective misfortune that people in the comment box are taking Shankarsingh’s words as truth and promoting them. Let us pray that Shankarsingh gets good sense and may Shankarsingh never meet the families of those 59 karsevaks in his life. Because we do not want a senior politician who has crossed eighty-one to face the same difficulties that he will have in facing these families.
