Home Blog Page 1505

Riots reduced by 50% under PM Modi Govt, 2022 the most peaceful year: Riots reduced by 90% in BJP-ruled states, increased by 30% in Congress-ruled ones

In the last 6 decades, 2022 has been the most peaceful year for the country in terms of cumulative incidences of rioting in any calendar year. From the time Indira Gandhi became the Prime Minister of the country, till 2022, last year recorded the lowest number of riots across the country, as per the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) data. In the year 2022, around 37,816 incidents of riots were recorded across the nation. 

In the last five years, cumulative incidences of rioting have been decreasing on a year-on-year basis. Notably, it has declined by more than 35% in the same period. 

The rioting incidents decreased by 9.5% in 2022 as compared to incidents recorded a year prior to that. As per NCRB data, the country recorded a total of 41,954 incidents of rioting in the year 2021. 

(Rioting cases have reduced by 35% in the last five years, as per NCRB data)

Strikingly, the NCRB data reveals that while BJP-ruled states have performed well in reducing riots and strengthening law and order, while Congress-ruled states have proved to be laggards in this. Notably, states like Uttar Pradesh, Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, and Assam have succeeded in reducing riots in the last five years. Incidentally, cases of rioting had increased in Chhattisgarh under the rule of the outgoing Congress government in the state. 

Uttar Pradesh, Gujarat, and Assam have achieved the greatest success in reducing riots in the last five years. NCRB data of rioting cases in 2022 as against that of 2018 points out that the number of riots in Gujarat and Assam decreased by 90% and 80% respectively. In the country’s largest state Uttar Pradesh, there has been success in reducing riots by 50% during the rule of Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath.

(BJP-ruled states have attained success in curbing incidences of rioting, Congress-ruled states laggard in this aspect, Source – NCRB data)

In contrast, riots increased under the Congress government once it assumed power in Chhattisgarh in the year 2018. In the year 2018, Chhattisgarh under Bhupesh Baghel’s tenure registered 665 incidents of riots and by the year 2022, it increased by 30% to 961. With the announcement of election results, the state will now see a change of government in the state as BJP secured 54 seats while the outgoing ruling party, Congress won 35 seats. 

Pertinent to note that in BJP-ruled states, that have recorded a reduction in the number of rioting incidences, illegal properties of criminals have been bulldozed to the ground to maintain law and order. Additionally, criminals’ properties have been continuously confiscated and photographs of rioters have been displayed among the public.

A statistical analysis of cases of rioting in the country highlights that there was a continuous increase in riots in the country since independence. In the year 1981, when Indira Gandhi was the Prime Minister, this figure had crossed 1.10 lakh. The first sharp decline in the incidents of riots in the country was recorded during the tenure of former Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee.

(Incidences of rioting has seen sharp decline in Modi government, as per NCRB data)

However, cumulative incidences of rioting once again increased in the country during the UPA government. Since Prime Minister Modi came to power in 2014, the number of riots in the country has been continuously decreasing making every new year the most peaceful year in the country.

In 2013, the last full year of Congress’s rule, the number of riots in the country was 72,126, which has come down to almost half during PM Modi’s tenure. Thus, in the Narendra Modi government, the incidents of riots in the country have reduced by about 48 percent.

Viral Video: Congress MLA Phool Singh Baraiya who vowed to blacken his face if BJP won 50 seats in MP, reveals the date & time to act on his words

A video of Congress MLA Phool Singh Baraiya, who won from the Bhander seat of Datia district, is doing rounds on the internet. In the viral video recorded before the announcement of assembly elections in the state, the Congress leader had vowed that he would blacken his face himself if BJP won even 50 seats in the Madhya Pradesh Assembly elections. 

When confronted about the viral video and his claims made before the election results, the Congress MLA said that he stands by his words and will blacken his face himself.

Notably, results for the Madhya Pradesh assembly elections alongside three other states were declared on 3rd December. BJP registered a landslide victory and retained power in the state securing 163 seats as against 66 seats of the Congress party. 

Once the election results were announced, netizens started sharing the said video challenging and perplexedly asking whether the Congress MLA would stand true to his words and himself blacken his face.

Phool Singh Baraiya told Aaj Tak that he is firm on his words and will blacken his face himself at 2 pm in front of Bhopal Raj Bhavan on 7th December.

However, he tried to defend himself and cast aspersions on the credibility of EVMs. According to the newly-elected Congress MLA, Congress was ahead in the counting of postal letters, but as soon as the counting started through EVMs, BJP went ahead. He even demanded that voting through EVMs should be stopped. He, however, did not explain how he won his seat if EVMs “favour” the BJP.

Notably, Phool Singh Baraiya won from his Bhander constituency by 29 thousand 438 votes and defeated BJP candidate Ghanshyam Pirounia. In 2018, Raksha Santram Sironia had won this seat on the Congress ticket. Later, he left Congress following the lead of the then Senior Congress leader Jyotiraditya Scindia and joined BJP. In the 2020 elections, Raksha won on the BJP ticket. However, this time BJP fielded former MLA Ghanshyam Pironiya but he could not lead the party to victory. 

Reacting to the viral video, the Bhartiya Janata Party also took a dig at the statement made by Phool Singh Baraiya before the elections. Taking to its official handle, the MP unit of BJP tweeted, “Phool Singh Baraiya ji, this arrogance of yours and Congress has been shattered by the people of Madhya Pradesh. If you are firm on your words then please tell the date and time of reaching Raj Bhavan in reply to this tweet.”

‘Kamal’ in, Kamal Nath out? Congress orders former MP CM to resign from post of state party president after defeat, reports say

It seems like Kamal Nath’s impending exit from politics will be far from graceful or rather a fall from grace. After losing to the BJP in Madhya Pradesh (MP) with dismal numbers, top Congress leadership in Delhi has reportedly ordered the former MP CM to step down, India TV wrote.

The BJP secured a comfortable majority with 163 seats while Congress trailed abysmally with 66 seats. The defeat on 3rd December has put a stamp on Kamal Nath’s diminishing leadership in the state particularly after what the state witnessed in 2018 and 2020.

The Congress in the 2018 elections won 114 seats, two short of the majority mark. The party took support from the independent candidates, Samajwadi Party (SP) and the Bahujan Samajwadi Party (BSP) to form a government that struggled for a year. The power tussle between Kamal Nath and Jyotiraditya Scindia proved fatal for the Congress government in MP. Scindia defected to the BJP paving way for Shivraj Singh Chouhan government in 2020.

One would think that Kamal Nath would look to avenge his defeat albeit he barely appeared active during the election campaign, far from campaigning mood even as the Congress had declared him the CM face.

Following Congress’s defeat, Kamal Nath addressed the media saying that he accepts the mandate of the people and congratulated the BJP. He chaired a review meeting of Congress candidates.

Now, reports quoting sources claim that the former MP CM may tender his resignation as MP Congress chief in his meeting with Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge. The senior Congress leader reportedly spoke to Rahul Gandhi on call following the defeat.

India Today quoting sources claims that the Congress leadership is upset over Kamal Nath’s remarks against several leaders of the INDI Alliance including Samajwadi Party Chief Akhilesh Yadav and JD(U) chief Nitish Kumar over seat sharing.

The Samajwadi Party too has blamed Kamal Nath for Congress’s loss. SP spokesperson Manoj Singh Yadav reportedly said, “Former Madhya Pradesh chief minister Kamal Nath gave an indecent statement against the SP chief. He called the SP chief, who has been a four-time MP and the Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh as ‘Akhilesh-Vishesh’ due to which not only Madhya Pradesh, but the people of Bahujan class and backward classes were hurt, and its adverse effect was reflected in the results.”

Despite everything, Kamal Nath did appear unaccepting of the result. Expressing surprise at the results, he reportedly said that the public mood was in Congress’s favour. He said, “Some MLAs are telling me that they did not get 50 votes in their own village. How is that possible?”

It is notable here that though officially Mallikarjun Kharge is Congress President, ‘high command’ in Congress essentially means Sonia Gandhi and her children.

I.N.D.I. Alliance meeting, called by Congress post defeat in Assembly elections, cancelled after several ‘allies’ pulled out

Two days after the Congress party called for a meeting of the I.N.D.I. Alliance in New Delhi, it has now come to light that the meeting scheduled for Wednesday (6th December) has been cancelled.

The development was confirmed in a news report by Republic Bharat. It must be mentioned that several Congress allies, including Akhilesh Yadav, and Nitish Kumar had earlier pulled out of the meeting.

Screengrab of the news report by Republic Bharat

The alleged ‘snub’ by alliance partners comes days after BJP won the elections in three crucial States of Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh.

Trinamool Congress supremo Mamata Banerjee had claimed that she did not receive any imitation about the I.N.D.I. Alliance meeting “.I don’t know, I have no information so I kept a programme in North Bengal…” she claimed.

“If we had the information, we wouldn’t have scheduled those programmes. We would have definitely gone (for the meeting), but we have not received any information,” Mamata Banerjee was heard saying.

Samajwadi party leader Akhilesh Yadav had lashed out at the Congress after its dismal performance in Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh.

Ab parinaam aa gaya hai toh ahankar bhi khatam ho gaya. Aane wale samay mein phir rasta niklega (Now that the results are out, the ego has also ended. In the coming days, a new way forward will be found),” he remarked.

“The SP’s fight in UP is bigger and the party SP has to make some big decisions. The talks will start from where they began. Wherever a party is strong the others should support it,” Yadav further added.

Janta Dal (United) leader Nitesh Kumar also skipped the meeting that was scheduled by the Congress on Wednesday (6th December), prior to its cancellation.

Party MP Sunil Kumar Pintu had previously said, “After results of the three-state elections came, they suddenly announced (INDIA Alliance meeting) and remembered their allies. What Congress is doing is that it is ignoring the allies on the support of which it is standing in states – JD(U) and RJD in Bihar, SP in Uttar Pradesh and Hemant Soren in Jharkhand.”

“Congress was ignoring them and these results are due to that. If Congress takes a major decision in the meeting on 6th Dec and puts forward regional parties, only then will INDIA have a future in 2024…There is a communication gap in INDIA alliance. Big leaders are not being consulted,” he pointed out the growing disillusionment within the Opposition parties.

Modi hai to mumkin hai: JD(U) MP Sunil Kumar Pintu after BJP’s success in Assembly Elections

In a big embarrassment for Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar, JD(U) MP in Lok Sabha, Sunil Kumar Pintu from Sitamarhi constituency, sung praises of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and even chanted BJP’s election slogan “Modi hai toh mumkin hai”.

Notably, the JD(DU) MP had also rejected the Bihar government’s caste census released in October saying that the data has huge irregularities.

Following BJP’s victory in assembly elections in 3 out of 4 states, Pintu said that BJP proved its slogan that “Modi hai toh mumkin hai” (Modi makes it possible).

Jo nara Bharatiya Janata Party ne diya hai ki ‘Modi hai toh mumkin hai’ aur ‘Modi magic hai’ yeh janta ne uspar apni mohar lagakar uss baat ko sahi kar diya ki sahi mein Modi magic hai (The slogan that BJP has given that with Modi it is possible and it is Modi magic, this was approved and proven by the people that there is indeed Modi magic),” the JD(U) MP said.

Referring to PM Modi’s address post election results at the BJP headquarter, Pintu supported PM’s call for the development of the “4 castes” namely women, youth, farmers and the poor.

“The attempt to give employment to our farmers, women, youth and poor is right. Until and unless these 4 castes are uplifted we will not be able to develop the nation. It is important that there should be development for women, farmers and youth and we can become a world power by 2047 only by uplifting the 4 castes including the poor,” the MP said.

The Lok Sabha MP from Sitamarhi also hit out at the Congress saying that the party remembered its allies only after losing in Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh and Rajasthan. The JD(U) MP alleged that the Congress lost because of ignoring its allies.

Pintu said that there is a big communication gap in the INDI Alliance and big leaders are not being consulted adding that INDI Alliance has a future in 2024 only if Congress puts regional parties forward.

“After results of the three-state elections came (Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan), they suddenly announced (INDI Alliance meeting) and remembered their allies. What Congress is doing is that it is ignoring the allies on the support of which it is standing in states – JD(U) and RJD in Bihar, SP in Uttar Pradesh and Hemant Soren in Jharkhand. Congress was ignoring them and these results are due to that. If Congress takes a major decision in the meeting on 6th Dec and puts forward regional parties, only then will INDIA have a future in 2024,” Pintu said.

Meanwhile, JDU Chief and Bihar CM Nitish Kumar will give the INDI Alliance meeting on 6th December a miss. JDU national president Rajeev Ranjan Singh alias Lallan Singh and Bihar minister Sanjay Kumar Jha will attend the meeting. Clearly, the assemly elections have widened the faultlines that exist within the INDI Alliance.

Rajdeep Sardesai tortures data to death, and compares apples with oranges, to try and give hope to Congress after party’s drubbing in assembly elections

0

On 3rd December, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) won the Assembly Elections in Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Chhattisgarh by a wide margin. Congress, which won all 3 states when elections were held in 2018, lost in all 3 states.

However, some individuals cook up theories to show the results that these assembly elections will favour Congress in the 2024 Lok Sabha Elections. One such individual is India Today’s anchor Rajdeep Sardesai, who came up with a bizarre interpretation of the results to spin the narrative in Congress’s favour.

On 5th December, Sardesai published an “analytic” post on the numbers from the Assembly Elections and compared it to the General Election results from 2019 so that Congress came out in a better position.

According to him, in 2019, the BJP won all 25 Lok Sabha seats in Rajasthan, and Congress failed to win a single seat. Based on the 2023 Assembly Election results, the BJP will win 14 seats, and Congress will win 11 in 2024.

Similarly, he claimed that BJP won 28 seats in Lok Sabha in Madhya Pradesh 2019 and Congress won only one. Based on the 2023 Vidhan Sabha results, the BJP would win 24, and the Congress would win 5 in the upcoming Lok Sabha Elections.

In Chhattisgarh, he asserted that BJP won 9 seats and Congress won 2 seats in 2019. Thus, the BJP would win eight, and Congress would win three seats in Lok Sabha 2024.

In Telangana, the BJP had won 4, and the Congress won 3 in 2019, which would tune into nine seats for Congress and 0 for the BJP.

The flawed narrative

Sardesai attempted to spin the Congress loss in the assembly elections as a positive outcome for the party in the upcoming General Elections. Selectively using the 2023 Assembly Election results compared to the 2019 General Election results would not work, as Sardesai claimed.

Let’s talk numbers. According to the data provided by the Election Commission of India (ECI), in the 2013 Madhya Pradesh Assembly Elections, the BJP won 143 seats, and the Congress won 71 seats. In the 2018 MP Assembly Elections, BJP won 109 seats, and Congress won 114 seats. In the 2023 Assembly Elections in MP, BJP won 163 seats, and Congress won 66 seats. Now, coming to Lok Sabha Elections in 2014, BJP won 27 seats, and Congress won 2 seats. In the 2019 General Elections, BJP won 28 seats, and Congress won 1 seat.

Source: ECI

In the 2013 Chhattisgarh Assembly Elections, BJP won 50 seats, and Congress won 38 seats. In the 2018 Chhattisgarh Assembly Elections, BJP won 15 seats, and Congress won 68. In the 2023 Assembly Elections in Chhattisgarh, BJP won 54 seats, and Congress won 35. Now, coming to Lok Sabha Elections in 2014, BJP won 10 seats, and Congress won 1 seat. In 2019, BJP won 9 seats and Congress won 2 seats.

In the 2013 Rajasthan Assembly Elections, BJP won 163 seats, and Congress won 21 seats. In the 2018 Assembly Elections in Rajasthan, BJP won 73 seats, and Congress won 100 seats. In 2023, the BJP won 115 seats, and Congress won 69 seats. In the Lok Sabha Elections 2014, BJP won 25 seats, and Congress won zero seats. In 2019, the BJP won 25 seats, and the Congress won zero seats.

If Sardesai’s logic is to be considered, Congress should have won at least 14 seats in Rajasthan in 2019, 20+ seats in MP, and 8 seats in Chhattisgarh, but in reality the numbers were 0,1, and 2 respectively. But in reality, Congress nosedived in the Lok Sabha 2019 elections.

Based on the numbers, it is clear that the voting dynamics are entirely different regarding Lok Sabha and Assembly Elections. Voters chose the national issues during the Lok Sabha elections and favoured BJP in all three states in the last two Lok Sabha elections, irrespective of the voting patterns in the assembly elections.

Sardesai cherry-picked the data and claimed there could be a way to defeat PM Modi’s influence on the Lok Sabha Elections. He misinterpreted and misrepresented the prevailing political sentiment. His analysis hinged on the assumption that the 2023 Assembly would translate into the Lok Sabha outcomes in 2024, ignoring the unique dynamics of state and national elections.

Here is why Muslim votes shifted from KCR’s BRS: Jan Ki Baat founder Pradeep Bhandari explains Telangana results and Congress strategy

In the recently concluded assembly elections in five states, the Congress managed to form a government in only one state—Telangana. Securing 64 seats, the Congress has a clear majority and will soon assume power in the state. With this, it will replace the Bharatiya Rashtra Samithi (BRS), which had been in power since the formation of the newly carved state in 2014.

Notably, the BRS changed its name from TRS (Telangana Rashtra Samithi) in December 2022 reflecting the national ambitions of the then CM KCR. However, following the defeat in the state assembly election, Delhi now seems to be a far-off dream for BRS Supremo K Chandrasekhar Rao. 

In the Telangana assembly elections, the Congress emerged as the largest party with 64 seats, surpassing the halfway mark of 60 seats. Consequently, Congress is confident about forming the government in the southern state. In contrast, the outgoing ruling party, BRS, which held power for the last 10 years, has been reduced to 39 seats. The BJP, on the other hand, has seen a notable improvement, increasing its tally from 1 MLA last time to 8 MLAs this time. AIMIM has retained its 7 seats out of the total 8 seats in the Hyderabad region. Goshamahal remains the only seat in the Hyderabad region beyond AIMIM’s influence and has been secured by BJP’s Raja Singh for the third consecutive time, achieving a hat-trick as Goshamahal’s MLA.

The BRS and AIMIM have been contesting elections in Telangana with an understanding. This benefitted BRS as its association with AIMIM has been fetching en mass votes from the Muslim community. This time Owaisi’s party had fielded candidates on 9 seats, while supporting BRS on all the remaining seats. However, this state assembly election saw a major shift

Incidentally, while Muslim voters of Hyderabad rallied behind AIMIM, they preferred Congress over the BRS-AIMIM alliance in the rest of the state. Strikingly, Congress secured a vote share of 39.40% while BRS received 37.35% votes share emphasising the impact of this en-mass shift of the Muslim community as a voting bloc.

KCR had promised ‘Muslim IT Park’

Both BRS and Congress left no stone unturned to woo Muslim voters. KCR had even promised that a separate IT park would be built for Muslims. He vowed to voters that if BRS returned to power, it would build an IT park for Muslims in the Pahari Sharif area near Hyderabad. During the election campaign, he accused Congress of considering Muslims only as a vote bank and not doing any work for their development. He also gave a poll promise to increase the reservation for Muslims in education and employment to 12%.

Additionally, the BRS Chief announced that he would prepare ‘Shaadikhana’ for the Muslim community. The KCR-led BRS government also started 296 residential schools only for Muslims, forcing the government to spend Rs 12,000 crore separately on the Muslim community which forms 13% of the state’s population. 

The BRS government came up with a scheme called ‘Shaadi Mubarak’ for Muslim girls. Under the scheme, Muslim girls were given financial assistance for marriage. He had also made a poll promise to develop the old Hyderabad on the lines of Turkey’s capital Istanbul. 

Despite that, before the state assembly elections, Jamaat-e-Islami state president Hamid Mohammad Khan had stated that they had no reason to continue supporting BRS. He accused the party of supporting anti-Muslim bills in Parliament.

For those unversed, KCR’s party BRS was absent from voting during the passage of the Triple Talaq bill in Parliament. At the same time, former state president of Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind, Hafiz Peer Sabbir Ahmed had also accused BRS of breaking the promise to Muslims on the issue of 12% reservation for the community. 

It has become clear that BRS will not be given entry into the I.N.D.I. alliance which will further weaken its chances in the Lok Sabha elections, as the fight for Muslim votes will only intensify from here on. The preference of the Muslim voters seems to be apparent that they want to strengthen the Congress party before the crucial 2024 Lok Sabha elections so that it can put up a fight against the BJP.

Muslims constitute 13% of the population in Telangana. Rahul Gandhi’s ‘Bharat Jodo Yatra’ had also traversed through the Muslim-dominated areas in Telangana to woo them. 

Congress made a special strategy to woo Muslim voters

Despite major poll promises from BRS and schemes benefitting the community, KCR-led BRS was not the first preference for Muslims while their alliance partner AIMIM managed to win 7 out of 9 seats. 

It is pertinent to note that while KCR was engrossed in Muslim appeasement, Congress also made special efforts to woo Muslim voters. Notably, Karnataka Housing and Minority Welfare Minister Zameer Ahmed Khan was deployed to court Muslim voters in Telangana. He stayed in Telangana for 28 days and held one meeting after the other with Muslim community leaders, thinkers, and Muslim leaders of the party.

He also held several rallies in Muslim-dominated areas. In 49 seats, he made a lot of efforts to polarise the Muslims in favor of the Congress party. He discussed strategies with Congress General Secretary KC Venugopal and was also in constant touch with the party’s national president Mallikarjun Kharge. 

Under this strategy, many leaders from BRS and AIMIM were also roped into the Congress party. Apart from Karnataka Minister Ahmed Khan, many other Muslim leaders from Karnataka were also deployed in Telangana to boost Congress’ prospects among the Muslim community.

These are the reasons why Congress secured the majority of Muslim votes in almost every district of Telangana, except Greater Hyderabad. Owaisi did not field any candidate from Goshamahal in Hyderabad, from where firebrand Hindu leader Raja Singh has been winning. Whereas in the Jubilee Hills area, AIMIM fielded their candidate against Congress’ contender Azharuddin, even though their alliance partner BRS had also given a candidate in this constituency. As a result, Congress suffered a defeat in this constituency. However, Congress had publicised it in such a way that Muslim votes were being deliberately divided.

This backdrop indicates that Asaduddin Owaisi somehow saved his stronghold of Hyderabad but could not transfer Muslim votes to his alliance partner KCR in the rest of Telangana. 

According to Karnataka Minister Zameer Ahmed Khan, apart from the guarantee schemes of Congress, the process of making election strategy in collaboration with ‘Muslim think tank’ for 49 seats was successful. He also attributed the victory to meetings with Muslim community leaders.

The founder of ‘Jan Ki Baat’, Pradeep Bhandari also believes that the voters from the Muslim community went towards Congress to strengthen it. Notably, he had made an accurate assessment of Telangana in the assembly elections. The assessment of ‘Jan Ki Baat’ said that Congress may get 48-64 seats in the state while BRS will get between 40-55 seats, and BJP’s seats would be around 13. His assessment was accurate and BRS got only 1 seat less than his assessment.

‘Whoever is strong against Modi, Muslim votes will be mobilised against him’: Pradeep Bhandari

OpIndia spoke to Pradeep Bhandari about the voting behaviour of the Muslim community in Telangana. He said that the main objective of Muslim votes is to stop BJP and Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and for that their first priority is always the Congress party. He asserted that whenever Muslim voters see that Congress can become stronger, they shift in that direction. He pointed out that after the formation of the Congress government in Karnataka, the party tried to create an environment that Narendra Modi could be defeated in 2024.

Pradeep Bhandari believes that due to this reason, Muslim voters felt that ‘their Congress’ was fighting the elections very well, so in such a situation most of the Muslim voters shifted from BRS to Congress. 

Referring to Rajasthan, he said that when Kanhaiya Lal Teli was murdered by Islamic fundamentalists raising ‘Sar Tan Se Juda’ slogans, there was a delay in the compensation given to the family, whereas in Jaipur, when a Muslim youth died in an interpersonal dispute, the Collector paid Rs. 50 lakhs overnight. Therefore, Muslims know that their first priority is Congress and that is why they want to do ‘ghar wapsi’.

For those unversed, when these incidents unfolded in Rajasthan, there was a Congress party government under the leadership of Chief Minister Ashok Gehlot. Referring to the demographic data, Jan ki Baat founder Bhandari said that where Muslim voters are more, i.e. around 30%, BJP has won in Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, and Chhattisgarh. 

He noted that earlier Congress used to think that in the seats where there are more Muslims, it would win the elections by only talking about them, but now this is not happening. Now people are uniting against appeasement.

During this, Pradeep Bhandari also mentioned the remarks made by Tamil Nadu Minister Udhayanidhi Stalin, in which he had likened Sanatan Dharma with dengue-malaria and called for eradicating it. 

Bhandari explained that the Congress party deliberately did not condemn this statement because of which it had to suffer the consequences. He told OpIndia that BJP won 35 seats in Madhya Pradesh where the Muslim community is dominant. Similarly, the majority of the 12 such seats in Chhattisgarh also went to BJP’s account.

Pradeep Bhandari added that the Muslim vote will not only rally behind Congress but if it sees that Mamata Banerjee’s TMC is strong in West Bengal, then it will rally behind it. Whereas Congress is strong in Telangana, this vote was gathered behind it. Pradeep Bhandari added that one more thing worth noting in this is that after the results of Hindi Heartland, there has been frustration among the Muslim voters that even after trying their best, they are not able to stop Narendra Modi.

Pradeep Bhandari further said, “Muslim voters will rally behind every party which according to them can defeat Narendra Modi in 2024. Mamata Banerjee in West Bengal or Congress Party in South India, but they will rally behind DMK in Tamil Nadu. They will not go after Congress in Bengal and Bihar.” That is, they clearly believe that Congress will be the first choice of Muslims, but where regional powers are fighting strongly against the BJP, these voters will go with them.

Liberals spread misinformation as BJP MLA Balmukund Acharya talks about closing illegal meat shops, accuse him of ‘targeting Muslims’: Here is the truth

Newly-elected BJP MLA from Jaipur’s Hawa Mahal, Balmukund Acharya immediately got into action following his victory. A video of the BJP MLA went viral on 4th December where the priest-turned-politician can be seen ordering a government official to shut down illegal non-veg shops in the Chandi Ki Taksal area in Jaipur.

The MLA can be heard telling the official on call, “Kindly shut down all illegal non-veg shops running on the roads in the Chandi Ki Taksal area. Check their license. I will take a report from you in the evening, will you send me the report or should I come to collect it? Can non-veg be sold in the road in the open? Do you support them? Non-veg stalls on the road should not be seen anymore with immediate effect. I will take a report from you in the evening, I will not see who the official is.”

No sooner did Balmukund Acharya received praise from netizens supporting his action, the mainstream media and left liberals alike began to manufacture a narrative showing the MLA in bad light.

Responding to News18, the BJP MLA said that he did not go to the area to shut down non-veg shops but to shut down illegal slaughterhouses being run on the roads and non-veg being cooked on the roads illegally. “Ask them for the license. Many of them are Bangladeshis and not from here, investigate them,” he said.

Balmukund added that he has received complaints of “white meat that is cow meat being sold”. “We have received complaints that they are selling white meat meaning cow meat. Fourth, they are encroaching on the roads.”

Balmukund Acharya said that there are only 117 licenses and more than 1500 slaughterhouses are being run. The BJP MLA did not mince his words when he said that such shops and practices have hurt the religious sentiments of Hindus while such shops have also become health hazards.

He said, “This city is Apra Kashi, not Karachi. We will now allow such situations to build here. This is a hub of tourists and pictures of Jaipur go around the world, they have finished tourism here too.” In another video, the BJP MLA is seen speaking to a cop while asking them to inquire a shop owner about his license.

The MLA can be seen asking all meat shop owners in the area to show their license as a huge crowd of supportings followed him. Meanwhile, the police has sought from him a time of two days to take action.

In another video, the MLA can be heard saying that he will not let any Rohingya or illegal Bangladeshi live in Jaipur. He was also heard asking an official to check the license of a hotel named ‘Afghani Darbar’.

OpIndia Hindi spoke to Tahir, the owner of the hotel. This hotel selling chicken meat is at Subhash Chowk in Jaipur. While talking to our team, Tahir confessed that he currently does not have a valid license to run a hotel. Tahir said that he has applied for the license. The owner of ‘Afghan Darbar’ also told us that MLA Balmukund did not assault him in any way as was being alleged by some.

The prompt action by saffron-clad Balmukund Acharya has hurt not only illegal meat shop owners but also left liberal Islamists. Even as the BJP MLA multiple times said that he is after illegally-run meat shops, certain mainstream media and Islamists began to mislead.

RJ Sayema took to X, formerly Twitter, calling the action by the BJP MLA as “moral policing”. A self-proclaimed research group on X, called “Hindutva Watch”, alleged that the MLA along with his “far-right supporters targeted Muslim-owned restaurants”.

President of Indian Youth Congress, Srinivas BV in a sarcastic post wrote, “This is Modi’s guarantee. Rajasthan has chosen him.”

A so-called political commentator on X named Harun Khan went to the extent of alleging that “Balmukund Acharya abused and threatened Muslims for closing the meat shop”.

India Today too shared the news on X saying that the BJP MLA ordered the shutting down of “all meat shops” in the area.

Another Islamist named Md Asif Khan, on X, falsely alleged that Muslim-owned non-veg hotels were being targeted.

Wasim Akram Tyagi shared a video of the BJP MLA inspecting the illegal meat shops and alleged that the leader was targeting and abusing Muslims. However, the video shows that it was not the BJP MLA but someone from the crowd who had hurled abuses.

Moreover, speaking about a case of temple destruction in the city, the BJP MLA said that he will work towards the restoration of all temples. The BJP MLA won from the Hawal Mahal seat in Jaipur defeating Congress candidate RR Tiwari.

‘They have to be prepared for many more meltdowns ahead’: PM Modi shares video detailing Congress and liberal meltdown over BJP victory in 3 states

On Tuesday (5th December), Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi slammed the Congress ecosystem for peddling the divide ‘North Vs South’ agenda after the BJP won elections in three States of Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh and Madhya Pradesh.

While sharing a video of journalist Shiv Aroor, PM Modi remarked, “May they be happy with their arrogance, lies, pessimism and ignorance but beware of their divisive agenda.”

“An old habit of 70 years can’t go so easily,” he took potshots at the Congress party. PM Modi emphasised, “Also, such is the wisdom of the people that they have to be prepared for many more meltdowns ahead.”

On Monday (4th December), journalist Shiv Aroor posted a 4-minute-long video, chronicling the tweets of the Congress ecosystem targeted at North Indians.

He pointed out the dehumanising terms used by the cabal of Congress-friendly political commentators for voters in Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh.

Shiv Aroor highlighted how the anti-Modi brigade has been demonising the electorates instead of revisiting their political strategy and furthering the divide in society.

Lies, falsehoods, and blatant propaganda: Bloomberg article by Ruth Pollard is a symphony of seething and coping after BJP’s electoral victory in 3 states

The rise of the political force that is the Bharatiya Janata Party under Modi’s leadership has been providing employment opportunities to a lot of columnists and Left-liberal propagandists around the world for nearly a decade now. An entire cabal of Left-liberal ‘analysts’, self-proclaimed ‘intellectuals’ and columnists keep themselves gainfully employed by writing doom and gloom pieces against India, its so-called downfall to an imaginary abyss of misery because that is what their Leftist ecosystem, and Western paymasters love to read.

The whole system works like the fanbase of a fantasy universe. The doom and gloom never come. Modi keeps winning election after election, India prospers faster and faster and keeps rising as a major global power, contrary to everything that the Leftists have been predicting (wrongly) for nearly a decade. But there is just no course correction. The higher-ups pay for fantasy pieces hating on Modi, so the columnists of the bottom keep producing the lies, again and again. The ecosystem survives on Modi hate and India hate.

The latest in this series is another word salad of lies and falsehoods published in Bloomberg, written by Ruth Pollard. The article, titled “India’s identity is more hardline Hindu than ever, doesn’t even know how to deal with the reality that Modi is set to win another term in office. In desperation, the author has jotted down some points and tried very hard to paint a picture of doom and gloom with so many lies and blatant misinformation that the result is a pathetic rant, not even worthy of being called an opinion.

Pollard begins by noting down the BJP’s 3 key objectives. And acknowledges that 2 of them have already been achieved. She adds that BJP came to power with 3 major promises:

  • Removing Article 370 from Jammu and Kashmir (which she misleadingly calls ‘special status’ of Kashmir, India’s only Muslim majority state)
  • Building Ram Mandir at Ram Janmabhoomi (which she falsely claims was a Muslim mosque)
  • Bringing a Uniform Civil Code (which she claims will be unfair to Muslims and other minorities. No reason, just “trust me bro”)

Here is how Pollard has lied through her teeth in this article. What is surprising is that publications like Bloomberg do not even engage a minimal editorial scrutiny or basic fact checks before publishing utter nonsense.

Ruth Pollard’s article in Bloomberg

Pollard claims that Jammu and Kashmir, India’s only ‘Muslim majority state’ was “forcibly brought under the control of the federal government in 2019”. Pollard has tried to create the idea that Jammu and Kashmir was somehow NOT a part of India and under India’s territorial and administrative sovereignty, just because it was ‘Muslim majority’.

The abrogation of Article 370 that allowed Jammu and Kashmir to TEMPORARILY have its own laws and penal code was legal, constitutional, and was done in the democratically elected Parliament, by the power vested on the government by the people of India. It was supported by a majority vote of the Members of Parliament, which includes representatives from the region and has been upheld by all Indian laws.

Whatever made Ruth Pollard believe that India cannot give the residents of Jammu and Kashmir the same rights that are enjoyed by all other Indians, is certainly derived from similar-level trash op-eds by her fellow Left propagandists and not rooted in an actual understanding of Indian laws and constitutional process.

Lies about the UCC and Ram Janmabhoomi

The Bloomberg columnist peddles utter lies on the Uniform Civil Code next. She insinuates, out of nothing, just her imagination, that the Uniform Civil Code, which by its very definition means a single, uniform code for all Indian citizens, will be unfair to Muslims. She then peddles total lies to justify that conjecture, that Modi will somehow sneak in loopholes that would allow Hindus to carry on their “worst practices”, like the dowry system and allowing only sons to inherit property while taking away the right of polygamy from Muslims.

Bloomberg’s article peddles falsehoods on UCC

Anyone with an iota of understanding of Indian laws will know that Hindus of the country are the only community who do not get any special rights to carry on with their existing social ills. All Hindu women are entitled to inherit property, by Indian law. The practice of dowry, which is not limited to Hindus alone, is a punishable crime under Article 498A which has been called ‘too strict’ and to some extent even ‘unfair’ because of the amount of power it gives to women. However, Hindus are prohibited from practicing polygamy, unlike Muslims, and unlike Muslims, Hindu families cannot deprive their daughters of property rights.

The columnist claims that the Ram Mandir is being built by the Modi government after ‘Hindu extremists’ tore down a 16th-century mosque, and the riots that followed, caused ‘mostly Muslims’ to die. The blatant lie has been told so smoothly that for clueless readers, who are obviously the target audience of the Bloomberg article, it would appear that the cruel Hindus of India demolished a holy Islamic site and forcibly are building a temple over it.

She does not bother to mention that the site was ‘Ram Janmabhoomi’, the birthplace of Lord Ram, where a temple existed for centuries before Islamic rulers demolished it. It does not mention that the Hindus, despite their population majority and political power, waited patiently and fought a legal battle for several decades to claim ownership of the site. It does not even mention the thousands of Hindus who were gunned down by state police of ‘secular governments’ for trying to protest against the desecration of their sacred land. It also does not mention that the Muslims were given an alternate site to build their mosque, which they accepted.

More coping and seething, because India is not being bullied by the US, Australia, and Japan

The next cycle of frustration of the author is displayed through a geopolitical point of view. She is angry at the USA, Japan, and Australia for not bullying India. She is also irritated at the fact that India, despite having the ‘Hindu’ Modi in power, is considered an important Quad ally by these nations for their desire to counter China.

Like many Left liberal columnists, Pollard forgets that the partners of the Indo-Pacific Quad are not doing a favor on India by ‘allowing’ to be in the Quad. India is the only nation in the Quad which has fought battles with China in recent years. India is the only nation among Quad partners that shares a land border with China, 3500 km of land border, no less. And the fact that the “Indo” in the Indo-Pacific is the Indian Ocean Region, where India has a massive coastline and is the dominant maritime power, not to mention one of the strongest naval forces in the world.

Someone should ask these columnists how exactly they plan to exclude India from the Indian Ocean Region. That ocean is called the “Indian” ocean for a reason after all.

The article concludes with some hard swallowed cope. It admits reluctantly that India is the fastest-growing economic power and investors are increasingly looking to put money in India rather than China. It acknowledges that Modi is set to win another term in office, and the sadness in tone is palpable when the author writes “Modi is a force to be reckoned with”, to finish her article. Well, she got that correct, at least.