Home Blog Page 2762

Pakistan: Hundreds of human corpses found abandoned, decomposing at the Nishtar Hospital in Multan, probe ordered

OpIndia Staff
-
0
Pakistan: Hundreds of human corpses found abandoned, decomposing at the Nishtar Hospital in Multan, probe ordered

Several unclaimed corpses that had been dumped were discovered in a hospital in Multan, Pakistan, in a disturbing incident. The event has been noted by the Pakistani government, which has begun an investigation.

Abandoned dead bodies are shown decomposing in the open in the disturbing footage from Nishtar Hospital, a teaching facility of Nishtar Medical University. The decayed remains were dumped on the top floor. According to reports, the number of dead bodies is feared to be more than 500.

A section officer wrote a letter to the medical superintendent of Nishtar Hospital in this regard. In this letter, it is said, “An appalling incident of decaying dead bodies on the rooftop of Nshtar Hospital, Multan has surfaced causing public outcry. A competent Authority has taken serious note of this terrible incident and asked for a detailed inquiry into the matter.”

It is further said in this letter, “In view of the above, you are requested to carry out an in-depth investigation into the matter and prepare an inquiry report on the matter which may be shared with this office within three days positively. This matter may be treated as most urgent.”

Horrific visuals of the corpses are doing rounds on social media. Viewer discretion is advised.

Chaudhry Pervaiz Elahi, the chief minister of Pakistan’s Punjab province, has taken notice of the situation and ordered an investigation. He also promised to take strong action against anyone found guilty.

A six-person team was constituted by the South Punjab Health Department on Thursday to look into the corpses that were found at Multan’s Nishtar Hospital.

Reports mentioned that most of the bodies have their chest cavities opened and organs removed.

According to a report by The Dawn, when Chief Minister’s Adviser Chaudhry Zaman Gujjar visited the hospital, he saw numerous putrefied bodies on the roof of the mortuary. He instructed the health authorities to take action against the concerned staff and ordered the cremation of the abandoned bodies.

Muzamil Bashir, the Specialised Healthcare Secretary, was also tasked with investigating the event by Additional Chief Secretary retired Capt Saqib Zafar. He also assembled a six-person team to investigate the matter.

The committee is headed by Bashir, and its members include Dr Muhammad Arfan Arshad, senior medical officer at Nishtar Medical University, Dr Shafiqullah Chaudhry, assistant professor of anatomy, and one representative from each of Multan’s deputy commissioner and municipal police officer. The committee will present its report within three days.

A student at Nishtar Medical University said, “The bodies were being used for medical experiments by the students.”

Switzerland to impose $1,000 fine on those violating ‘Burqa Ban’

OpIndia Staff
-
0
Switzerland to impose $1,000 fine on those violating ‘Burqa Ban’

On Wednesday, the Swiss government sent a draft law to parliament seeking to levy fines up to $1000 (Rs 83,000) from people who violate the national ban on face veils in an effort to implement the ‘Burqa ban’ in Switzerland.

Notably, the proposal to ban face veiling in public was passed in a referendum last year. The right-wing Swiss People’s Party (SVP) members who constitute the Egerkinger Komitee, which claims to organize “resistance against the claims to power of political Islam in Switzerland”, are behind the initiative to outlaw face veils.

Contending that “free people show their faces” and “the burqa and niqab are not normal clothes,” the group amassed the necessary 100,000 petition signatures in 2017 to push a referendum on the issue. 51.2% of Swiss voters approved the proposed ban.

The draft law, which was sent on October 12, comes after a 2021 referendum on banning face coverings. Following deliberation, the cabinet softened earlier demands to include the ban in the criminal code and impose fines of up to $10,000 on violators. 

Despite the fact that the cabinet’s proposed sanctions did not directly mention Islam and also aimed to prevent violent street protesters from donning masks, local MPs, the media, and activists refer to the measure as the “burqa ban.” According to a formal statement, face coverings are prohibited in the community to maintain peace and safety, while punishment is not the main focus.

A number of legitimate exceptions were also included in the draft. Aircraft, diplomatic locations, and religious sites may all be exempt from the ban. Health, safety, climatic, and regional customs coverages would remain in effect. It would not apply to commercials or artistic acts.

Except for Switzerland, facial coverings are outlawed in France, which made wearing a full-face veil in public illegal in 2011. In Denmark, Austria, Bulgaria, and the Netherlands, facial coverings are either completely or partially banned.

Muslims make up about 5% of the Swiss population, with the majority having roots in Turkey, Bosnia, and Kosovo.

Egerkinger Komitee

The Egerkinger Komitee proposed a ban on minarets in 2009 on the grounds that they are a manifestation of political Islam. Despite the opposition of domestic Muslim organisations, it was approved by 57.5 percent of Swiss voters.

The SVP first sought to outlaw full-face coverings through a parliamentary initiative to amend the Federal Constitution in December 2014, claiming that burqas pose a threat to national security. However, in March 2017, the Swiss Council of States rejected it.

Varanasi Court rejects plea for a scientific evaluation of Shivling inside Gyanvapi mosque: Details

OpIndia Staff
-
0
Varanasi Court rejects plea for a scientific evaluation of Shivling inside Gyanvapi mosque: Details

On Friday (October 14), the Varanasi district court turned down the petition of the Hindu side, which demanded the a scientific evaluation of the Shivling found inside the Gyanvapi mosque complex.

The verdict was pronounced by District Judge AK Vishvesh. It must be mentioned that the Anjuman Intezamia Masjid Committee Varanasi had earlier objected to the Hindu side’s request on the grounds that it is located in a ‘prohibited area’.

The development was also confirmed by journalist Gaurav C Sawant of India Today. “No to Carbon Dating of the Shivling (the Muslim side claims it is a fountain). Wazukhana with Shivling to remain sealed: Court,” he tweeted.

“Supreme Court had also said the ‘Shivling’ should not get damaged. Plea rejected on the basis of Supreme Court order,” he added.

On May 17 this year, the Supreme Court of India ordered that the Shivling found inside the Gyanvapi mosque should be protected.

Justice DY Chandrachud had pronounced an order extending that the Varanasi DM should ensure that the area where the Shivling is found should be duly protected. It also maintained that the order in any manner should not restrict or impede the right of the Muslims to use the Mosque for religious purposes. 

The Varanasi court relied on the apex court verdict to reject the petition of the Hindu side. It argued that if carbon dating or ground penetration radar is employed, it may harm the Shivling and go against the verdict of the apex court.

The district court also claimed that an order to allow scientific study can affect the religious sentiments of the masses. A Shivling was discovered inside the Wazookhana of the mosque compound on May 16, 2022, during a survey by the court-appointed panel.

The Hindu side said that this was major proof that the mosque was erected by razing Lord Vishweshwar’s temple in Kashi.

OpIndia spoke to Hindu side lawyer Vishnu Shankar Jain who told that they will now approach the Supreme Court on this matter.

Elon Musk says he is just following Ukrainian diplomat’s recommendation to ‘f*ck off’, informs US govt that he can no longer provide free Starlink

OpIndia Staff
-
0
Elon Musk says he is just following Ukrainian diplomat’s recommendation to ‘f*ck off’, informs US govt that he can no longer provide free Starlink

On Friday, October 14, Elon Musk’s SpaceX informed the US government that they may no longer be able to provide the Starlink satellite internet services to Ukraine for free. US media reported that SpaceX had informed Pentagon about it last month.

The letter had reportedly asked the US government to take up funding the Starlink services for Ukraine. It is notable here that Musk had provided Starlink services to Ukraine worth millions of dollars per month after the war with Russia affected communications. Starlink services are considered ‘critical infrastructure’ in Ukraine and have been used extensively by the Ukrainian military.

Following the news, there were wide speculations if Musk has taken the decision after the barrage of rude responses and insults he received for proposing a peace plan to resolve the war.

Jason Jay Smart, a journalist working for the Ukrainian media outlet Kyiv Post reminded people that Ukrainian diplomat Andrij Melnyk had recently asked Elon Musk to “f*ck off”.

Elon Musk, in his usual humour, responded by tweeting that his company was simply carrying out the directions issued to him by the Ukrainian Ambassador to Germany. That is, they are ‘f*cking off’.

Apparently, the war of words began earlier this month, when Musk’s peace proposal was met with fierce insults and mockery by Ukrainians and many Americans. Ukraine’s ambassador to Germany Andrij Melnyk had asked Musk to “F*ck Off”.

Ukrainian diplomat’s response to Musk’s peace proposal

On October 3, 2022, in a tweet, Musk put forward a plan to restore peace in Eastern Europe and end the Russia-Ukraine conflict. He wrote, “Redo elections of annexed regions under UN supervision. Russia leaves if that is the will of the people. Crimea is formally part of Russia, as it has been since 1783 (until Khrushchev’s mistake). Water supply to Crimea assured. Ukraine remains neutral.”

The Tesla CEO also sought the opinion of Twitterati through a poll, with the Westerners voting en masse against his proposal. “This is highly likely to be the outcome in the end – just a question of how many die before then…Also worth noting that a possible, albeit unlikely outcome from this conflict is nuclear war,” he tweeted.

On being quizzed about providing satellite Internet access coverage in Ukraine through Starlink, Elon Musk responded, “The will of the people should decide whether they are part of Russia or Ukraine, but Russia invaded areas that would unequivocally choose to be part of Ukraine.”

Ukrainian president Volodymr Zelensky also retorted echoing Melynk’s sentiment with his own Twitter poll. Zelensky Tweeted: “Which Elon Musk do you like more?”

His followers were then able to chose between two options: “One who supports Ukraine” and “One who supports Russia?”

Besides, several westerners also lambasted the Tesla CEO on Twitter for supposedly “siding with Russia” and ‘legitimising’ the annexation of Ukrainian territories by Vladimir Putin.

Elon Musk, who had patiently responded to his critics until then, lost his composure. “We gave Starlinks to Ukraine & lost $80M+ in doing so while putting SpaceX & myself at serious risk of a Russian cyberattack. What have you done besides tweet?” he asked.

Days after this verbal spat on Twitter, now reports have emerged confirming that Elon Musk’s SpaceX will no longer pay for critical Starlink satellite services in Ukraine.

Musk’s SpaceX states it will no longer be able to pay for critical satellite services in Ukraine

Notably, Musk had previously granted Ukraine access to his Starlink satellite network in order to defend Ukraine’s digital infrastructure and avoid internet outages. Elon Musk’s SpaceX’s Starlink satellite internet terminals have been a critical source of communication for Ukraine’s military, allowing it to fight and stay linked even while cellular phone and internet networks have been devastated in the country’s war with Russia.

Recently, however, SpaceX warned the Pentagon that it may discontinue sponsoring the service in Ukraine unless the US military contributes tens of millions of dollars every month.

According to CNN, SpaceX sent a letter to the Pentagon stating that it can no longer pay the Starlink service as it has been. The letter also asked the Pentagon to take over funding for Ukraine’s government and military usage of Starlink, which SpaceX believes will cost more than $120 million for the rest of the year and might cost close to $400 million in the next year.

The decision came months after billionaire Elon Musk said on Twitter that the former head of Roscosmos (Russian Space Agency), Dmitry Rogozin, threatened him with consequences for providing ground-based subscriber equipment of Starlink to the militants of the Nazi Azov Battalion and the Marines of the Armed Forces of Ukraine using military helicopters in Mariupol.

Recently, Musk and several other experts have expressed concerns that the possibility of a nuclear war has increased significantly as the Russia-Ukraine conflict worsens.

Vishnu Shankar Jain talks to OpIndia about the Gyanvapi case, the Places of Worship Act and Hindu symbols found during the survey

Pallav
-
0
Vishnu Shankar Jain talks to OpIndia about the Gyanvapi case, the Places of Worship Act and Hindu symbols found during the survey

The Shringar Gauri-Gyanvapi complex case has been heated, with the first action demanding the right to pray at the Gyanvapi disputed site. Advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain and Senior Advocate Hari Shankar Jain are representing five female petitioners in the lawsuit, which aims to restore the devotees’ right to pray. OpIndia interviewed Advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain, who made some thrilling revelations concerning the case and the underlying concerns.

How did the plan for the case come up? As it was a dispute that persisted for a long but what made the petitioners stand up for the cause and why now?

First of all, we need to understand that a deity is permanent. If at a place, a deity or a form of energy is consecrated, that remains and exists at the same place in time. Therefore, instead of this question, I’d rather ask why the Places of Worship Act was enacted in 1991 and why it is now facing opposition. Why was the nation sleeping for 30 straight years?

There are a whole lot of things which come to be known over a period of time. I came into my profession in 2010. When I studied this case, got the opportunity to be involved in the Ram Mandir case, and studied the rights of Hindu deities, I came to know that Hindus in this country have faced a lot of injustice. One of them is the case pertaining to the Shringar Gauri temple in Kashi Vishwanath, where devotees were allowed to worship till November 1993, but the Mulayam Singh Yadav-led Samajwadi Party Government in Uttar Pradesh stopped them and seized their rights.

So, when I came to know about all this and found that the law allows me to contest this in a court of justice, I decided to go with it. If the law allows me to do this, it doesn’t matter when and how I raise this issue. Timing is not at all important. What is important is that Hindus awakened and decided to correct the injustices done to them through courts of justice and not the streets.

As you mentioned the Places of Worship Act 1991, what do you want to say about that? Do you think it should be repealed?

According to me, the Places of Worship Act is a poorly drafted and vaguely crafted legislation that is susceptible to many interpretations and is such a legal mess that it has a significant impact on Hindus’ legal rights. Whether it be the rights of the deities, or the rights of Hindus to reclaim and restore their religious sites, the bad drafting of this Act has played a vital role in hampering the rights of Hindus. I feel this act should get repealed by the central government.

Are there loopholes in the Places of Worship Act which can be used to advantage of Hindus?

That has already been done. The Act allows deciding the religious character of a site and we have applied it in trial courts in both Kashi and Mathura cases and we have had verdicts on our side.

As the merits of the Shringar Gauri case are also known to everyone including the history of Islamic tyrants destroying Indian heritage and specifically Hindu temples, what do you want to say regarding the progress of the case?

I just want to say that all the Islamic organisations are going with the narrative of the debates that occurred during the legislation of the Places of Worship Act. They need to understand that the drafting of the Act is very poor and all the promises and discussions are irrelevant if we get to see the drafting of the Act. Those are empty promises. Section 3 of the Act says that no character of a religious place will be changed but even after the law is in place, it has been violated like in 1993 when Hindus were thrown out of the Shringar Gauri temple where they had been worshipping for centuries. There was a violation of Section 3 and Section 6 has provisions for punishment but not a single person has been punished to date.

Secondly, in Kashmir after August 15 1947, or in almost every state in India, many Hindu temples have been broken and converted into Islamic sites, resulting in no action and punishment under Sections 3 & 6. Also, this needs to be understood clearly that we are not saying that we want to convert the religious character of a site, we are not saying that if a mosque is constructed at a place through proper legal ways and we want to encroach on it or convert it to a temple. This is the reason I have challenged the constitutional validity of Section 4 and not Section 3. We just want that if a place or a mosque was earlier a Hindu temple, it must be restored and reclaimed so that Hindus are able to exercise their rights. There is nothing else that we need. The Places of Worship Act 1991 does not hamper this but still, the act is open to various interpretations and can be used in different ways. I think the central government should repeal this act as a whole so that Hindus are able to exercise their rights properly. Even if this act does not exist, people will file their cases as legal suits and civil suits in civil courts and get judgments based on merits and facts. There is no point in having such a badly drafted act in place in this country.

About the Shivling, the findings of the court-ordered survey, the sealing and the Wuzukhana

First of all, when the court-commissioned survey of the premise took place on 14, 15, and 16 May, a whole lot of things were discovered from the site and I would like to put it boldly with OpIndia that this is the reason the survey was opposed at such a scale. The Secretary of the Masajid Committee openly threatened and stated that the survey can only be conducted on his dead body. This was just to conceal the truth.

Now coming to the findings, the alleged Masjid has more than substantial proof of it being a Hindu temple. Under the domes of the mosque, there are Shikhars of a Hindu temple. We have seen them and it has been recorded and submitted to the court too. The Shikhar of the Hindu temple has been damaged and it has been covered with the domes of the mosque. There are small windows in the domes through which we can clearly see the semi-broken Shikhar.

After this, several signs and emblems of Hindu culture and tradition have been found on the walls of the disputed structure. Signs like Trishul, Damru, Swastik and many others are clearly visible on all the walls of the disputed structure. There is a Gyanvapi calendar below the central dome and behind that is a Swastik symbol engraved on the wall. This shows how efforts were made to conceal the truth. There are Sanskrit Shlokas written on the pillars and the walls of the mosque.

There are also semi-destroyed statues of deities on the walls. In the basement, there are sub-shrines all around. During the survey, we came across the Wuzukhana and found a well-like structure in the centre of the Wuzu pond. I told Aijaz Bhai, the caretaker of the premise, to drain the water so that we can check what is inside. They kept denying giving various reasons but we insisted on our demand. Finally, they drained it and what we found was astonishing! A huge Shivling came up to be visible in the centre of that pond which they claimed to be a fountain.

So, we filed an application to get that Shivling tested scientifically. They are even opposing this move. If they say that this is a fountain then why get worried? Let the truth come out.

This is so disgusting to find that the Shivling was concealed in a Wuzukhana where Muslims went to wash their feet and rinse their mouth. This is how they played with the emotions of Hindus. They even went to the Supreme Court insisting that they should be allowed to do Wuzu in the same pond. I am very much thankful to the Solicitor General and the Union government who stated in the court that if someone even touches the Shivling, it will be a law & order problem.

This is ludicrous to find that Aurangzeb did not make a single original structure during his reign and constructed this fountain that too adjacent to a millennia-old temple! Aurangzeb did not make a single mosque during his reign and just demolished temples and converted them into Islamic places of worship.

All the threats being issued from the Muslim side are just to ensure that the truth doesn’t come out in the public domain. The truth can only come out through a scientific evaluation of the site and through expert opinion, and not through public opinion or plebiscite. This is a matter of justice, and it cannot be decided in any parliament. This can only be decided in a court of justice, in a court of law. These people are even threatening courts, which is just out of imagination. I feel that the administration should come heavily on them.

Coming to the scientific evaluation thing, why has carbon dating been demanded from the side of Hindus?

I have much to explain regarding this. The fact around carbon dating has been peddled as a misnomer by the other side. There has been a very big conspiracy to derail the entire case from the track. Before answering this question, I’d like to lay emphasis on the background of this case.

On May 5 this year, we met with all five petitioners in Varanasi and the route map for the survey was decided. However, on May 8, a representative of Rakhi Singh, one petitioner among five, filed an application in the court that she wants to withdraw the case. Then, the other four petitioners stated that they will not withdraw the case at any cost and if Rakhi Singh wants, she can withdraw from her side.

Later, all four petitioners were invited to a hotel room by the representative of Rakhi Singh and they were told that if they withdraw the case, they will be benefitted in a way. All four petitioners denied the proposal and stated that they will not withdraw the case even if they are forced to consume poison. Following this, the court ordered a survey and it was completed on 14, 15, and 16 May 2022. Rakhi Singh made numerous efforts to derail the functioning of the commission and made unwarranted statements in the media even after the admonition of the administration to make no public remarks.

Following all this, frivolous campaigns were run in the media that I and my father were removed as the counsels of the Hindu side from this case. This was all being done as part of a controversy. The Muslim side is well aware that they cannot win this case until we represent the petitioners. I and my father received multiple death threats to abandon the case and save our lives. But we were adamant. We are adamant and we will win this case for sure with the blessings of Mahadev.

Now coming to carbon dating, we, as the Hindu side, never asked for it. We never asked for this in court. We asked for a scientific evaluation of the site but as per a conspiracy, it was peddled in the public domain that we were demanding carbon dating. We never ever demanded carbon dating, and I want this to reach the masses through OpIndia.

As per a conspiracy, it was insinuated in the public domain that we wanted carbon dating of the Shivling and it would result in harming the Shivling physically. It should come to public notice that the affidavit of Rakhi Singh and the Muslim side was completely the same and both of them opposed the scientific evaluation of the site. Rakhi Singh is compromised. We only want a scientific evaluation of the site and it is up to the court to decide what kind of tests are needed to be done to evaluate the age of the Shivling.

(This interview of lawyer Vishnu Shankar Jain was taken before the judgement by the Court on the carbon dating of the Shivling found in Wuzukhana)

Hijab debate: Muslim panellists misquote Rigveda to make derogatory remarks against Sita, Lakshmana, exposed when asked to cite Shloka

OpIndia Staff
-
0
Hijab debate: Muslim panellists misquote Rigveda to make derogatory remarks against Sita, Lakshmana, exposed when asked to cite Shloka

Months after a Muslim leader Taslim Rehmani incited Nupur Sharma by provocative remarks against Shivling found at the Gyanvapi structure, Muslim panellists in a News 18 debate recently misquoted revered Hindu scripture Rigveda to make derogatory remarks against Goddess Sita and Lord Lakshmana.

Speaking in favour of the veil following the Supreme Court’s split verdict on hijab, Syeda Falak, a Muslim co-panellist in a debate hosted by journalist Amish Devgan, said that Hindus have corrupted their religion and that Hindu scriptures have long endorsed the concept of hijab or purdah.

“The concept of hijab is not exclusive to Islam. Hinduism had it too. Why is it that Lakshamana always saw Sita wearing a purdah?…but, Hindus have long forgotten their religion. They have allowed their faith to be corrupted. But we will not. Islam is immutable and we will resist all efforts to change it.”

It is worth noting that while Syeda Falak felt no qualms in making derogatory references against Goddess Sita and Lord Lakshamana, she had been at the forefront to spew venom against former BJP spokesperson Nupur Sharma, who cited Islamic Hadiths to remark on Prophet Muhammad after Taslim Rehmani mocked Shivling discovered at the Gyanvapi site. She had also shared the picture of Nupur Sharma with shoe marks on her face, indirectly egging on the Islamists to hound her for her remarks on Prophet Muhammad.

Maulana Sajid Rashidi cites Rigveda to claim Goddess Sita wore purdah in front of Lord Lakshamana

The controversy spiralled further when another panellist, Maulana Sajid Rashidi, a Muslim cleric who has a history of making controversial remarks and who had in the past justified mocking Hindu Gods, threw his weight behind Falak’s baseless claims and cited Rigveda to contend that Goddess Sita always wore a purdah so that Lord Lakshamana cannot see her directly.

“Rigveda states that Sita wore purdah in the presence of Lakshamana. The mantras in Rigveda talk about the practice of purdah,” Maulana Sajid Rashidi said.

Rashidi’s remarks drew strident objections from Shubhrastha, an activist and an observant Hindu, who challenged the Maulana to quote the page number and the shloka number where Rigveda talked about Goddess Sita wearing a veil in the presence of Lord Lakshamana.

Finding himself between a big rock and a hard place, Rashidi tried to skirt the challenge, beating around the bushes and resorting to what a person without a response usually does: hurling recriminations.

Shubhrastha and Amish Devgan take Maulana to the cleaners, slam him for misquoting Rigveda

“Maulana shloka bata (Tell me the shloka, Maulana),” Shubhrastha thundered even as Rashidi kept blabbering senselessly but cunningly avoiding divulging the page number and the shloka that said Goddess Sita wore a veil in front of Lord Lakshamana.

Anchor Amish Devgan, moderating the debate, too, chimed in, schooling Rashidi on misquoting the Hindu scripture and taunting him that he is a Whatsapp Maulana who may have fallen for fake claims made on the popular social media app.

Citing Valmiki Ramayana, Shubhrastha stated that there is no reference to Goddess Sita wearing a purdah in front of Lord Lakshamana. On the contrary, as a mark of respect toward his sister-in-law, Shubhrastha added, Lord Lakshamana regarded Goddess Sita as his mother and always spoke to her with his eyes fixed on her feet.

After being incessantly probed about the shloka from Rigveda, Maulana Rashidi finally relented, stating that he read about Goddess Sita wearing a purdah on Page no. 833 and Shloka numbers 19-20.

Shubhrastha instantly flipped to the aforementioned page number and read the Shloka the Maulana was referring to. Shubhrastha said the Shloka was meant to invoke Agni Deva, the demigod of Fire, and had no reference to Goddess Sita, Lord Lakshmana, or the imaginary veil that Syeda and Maulana had bastardised in the Hindu scripture.

While citing nuggets of information from authentic and time-honoured Islamic hadiths can result in political banishment and a looming spectre of death with a murderous mob of Islamists chanting ‘Sar Tan Se Juda‘ against one, distorting holy scriptures of Hinduism do not attract the same fate, which is why such instances keep repeating on live television by usual suspects.

Maulana Rashidi’s anti-Hindu antics

Earlier this year, Rashidi stated in an interview in May that the Hindu religion is no religion in the first place and that people were unnecessarily being happy over the Shivling discovered in the disputed structure of Gyanvapi Masjid. He blatantly termed the Shivling as a ‘fountain’ and made several attempts to demean the Hindu culture and belief.

Maulana Sajid Rashidi is known for his ‘scholarly’ opinions that mostly are anti-Hindu and difficult for the civic society to acknowledge. On January 8, he had passed several warnings that Ayodhya’s Ram Mandir might be demolished by some Mohammad Bin Qasim in future. He had tried to articulate the mythical fantasy that leftists in India continue to peddle in order to whitewash the crimes of tyrannical Muslim rulers who invaded India.

Rashidi had said that Muslim kings who ruled India in the past were benevolent and secular rulers, who not only built mosques for their Muslim subjects but also built temples and generously donated for the upkeep of existing Hindu religious places. He had made similar controversial remarks during the Bhumi pujan of the Ram Temple in August 2020. 

He had then said that a mosque will be rebuilt after demolishing the Ram Mandir. He also claimed that Prime Minister Modi had ‘violated the constitution’ by visiting the Ayodhya temple event. A complaint was later filed against the Islamic cleric for making provocative statements against Hindus and for issuing threats to demolish the under-construction Ram Mandir at Ayodhya.

Supreme Court’s split verdict on hijab ban in educational institutes

On October 13, the two-judge bench of Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia of the Supreme Court of India delivered a split verdict on the Karnataka hijab case. While Justice Gupta upheld the ban on Hijab in education institutes and dismissed the appeals challenging the Karnataka High Court order, Justice Dhulia allowed it. 

As a result of the split ruling, the case will now be sent to the Chief Justice of India for suitable directions.

The implication of the split verdict meant that the Karnataka High Court’s ban on hijab will hold until the CJI issues an order in the case.

The Karnataka High Court declared on March 15 that wearing a headscarf does not constitute an essential Islamic practice as the petitioners failed to provide evidence in that regard. The Karnataka High Court dismissed all petitions contesting the hijab ban in Karnataka schools and decided that the rules for the uniform dress were fair and that students can not object to respective dress codes mandated by educational institutions.

A Full Bench of the High Court comprising Chief Justice Ritu Raj Awasthi, Justice Krishna Dixit, and Justice JM Khazi pronounced the decision. The Bench ascertained that the petitioners’ basic rights were not violated by a uniform dress code at educational institutions.

European Union’s top court rules hijab can be banned at work, says ban not discriminatory and unlawful if it is part of a broader prohibition

OpIndia Staff
-
0
European Union’s top court rules hijab can be banned at work, says ban not discriminatory and unlawful if it is part of a broader prohibition

Amid the ongoing controversy around the mandatory hijab in Iran and the ban on it in schools in Karnataka, the European Union’s (EU) top court on Thursday said that corporations and businesses may restrict the wearing of hijabs or headscarves as long as it is part of a broader prohibition. The Court was hearing a case relating to a Muslim lady who was notified that she could not wear a hijab when she applied for a six-week work internship at a Belgian company.

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) maintained that a general prohibition on a headscarf is not discriminatory against workers on religious grounds and does not violate EU law. According to the reports, the woman said that she was not allowed to wear a hijab when she applied for a traineeship program at a Belgian company.

However, the company stated that it has a neutrality rule under which all kinds of head coverings are banned inside its premises including hats, caps, or headscarves. The woman took her grievance to a Belgian court who eventually referred the case to the CJEU for clarification on the EU law. The top court ruled on October 13 that a general ban on hats and headwear does not violate EU law.

According to the CJEU, there should not be any direct discrimination in such a ban. “The internal rule of an undertaking prohibiting the visible wearing of religious, philosophical or spiritual signs does not constitute direct discrimination if it is applied to all workers in a general and undifferentiated way”, the judges were quoted. However, now the Belgian court has to decide whether the ban constitutes indirect discrimination.

Notably, last year, the CJEU had ruled that EU companies could prohibit their employees from wearing headscarves under specific situations if they were required to portray a neutral image to clients. There are many countries including France, Germany and Netherlands who have imposed ban on hijab in public places or in schools and other educational institutions.

France was the first European country to prohibit the niqab and burqa from being donned in public places. Meanwhile, in Germany, the question of hijab ban mostly affects aspiring teachers in public schools and trainee judges. Niqabs and burqas are also prohibited in schools, hospitals, and public transportation in the Netherlands.

The recent decision by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) came amid the ongoing controversy in India around the hijab ban in Karnataka educational institutions. Yesterday, the two-judge bench of Justices Hemant Gupta and Sudhanshu Dhulia of the Supreme Court of India delivered a split verdict on the Karnataka hijab case. While Justice Gupta upheld the ban on Hijab in education institutes and dismissed the appeals challenging the Karnataka High Court order, Justice Dhulia allowed it.

Justice Hemant Gupta upheld the ban by dismissing the 26 appeals filed against the judgment of the Karnataka High Court which held that hijab was not an essential practice of Islam and allowed the ban on wearing headscarves in educational institutions in the State. Meanwhile, Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia, expressed “divergence in opinion.” He set aside the Karnataka High Court judgment and held that the entire concept of essential religious practice was not essential to the dispute. Owing to this difference of opinion, the Supreme Court bench has placed the matter before the Chief Justice of India for ‘appropriate directions’.

On the other hand, millions of young women in Iran are protesting against the mandatory hijab rule in the Islamic nation, following the killing of Mahsa Amini by the police after she was detained for wearing hijab improperly. While the protests have spread to the entire nation, around 200 people have been killed in brutal police action to contain the protests, including several children.

Russia gives green signal to NIA to interrogate ISIS terrorist, trained in Turkey, who wanted to kill prominent Indian leader over Nupur Sharma remarks

OpIndia Staff
-
0
Russia gives green signal to NIA to interrogate ISIS terrorist, trained in Turkey, who wanted to kill prominent Indian leader over Nupur Sharma remarks

Two months after the Federal Security Service (FSB) of Russia nabbed an ISIS suicide bomber, it has now given nod to India’s request to interrogate the terrorist.

As per reports, the ISIS terrorist was identified as 30-year-old Mashrabkon Azamov. The FSB had informed that the Uzbekistan-born Islamist had undergone training in Turkey for 3 months and was tasked to assassinate an important Indian leader to avenge alleged blasphemous remarks by Nupur Sharma.

The National Investigation Agency (NIA), the Indian counter-terrorism task force, will now visit Moscow and gather information about the larger conspiracy to orchestrate terror attacks in India.

The central agency will also probe possible Indian links, tasked to provide explosives, and logistics to the ISIS terrorist. The NIA had earlier requested the Russian authorities to share the interrogation report of Mashrabkon Azamov.

Reportedly, NIA will further investigate the source of radicalisation against India in Turkey, which is a close ally of Pakistan.

Russia alerts India about possible ISIS terror attack

In August this year, the Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation detained Mashrabkon Azamov, who had planned to carry out suicide bombing attack against one of the ‘representatives of the ruling circles of India’.

It also confirmed that the detained terrorist was recruited by one of the ISIS leaders as a suicide bomber in Turkey. He, as per the statement, visited Turkey between April and June, 2022. Russian authorities had also released a short video of the unnamed terrorist.

“They processed it remotely using Telegram and at personal meetings in Istanbul. As a result, the terrorist took an oath of allegiance to the Amir of IS. After that, he was given the task of leaving for Russia, completing the necessary documents and flying to India to commit a high-profile terrorist act,” the FSB added.

Earlier, the terror outfit Islamic State Khorasan Province (ISKP) had released a 10-minute video about India and the ex-BJP spokesperson in June this year. Islamic State Khorasan Province (ISKP) is an affiliate of ISIS that functions in South East Asia and Central Asia.

In the video titled, ‘The polytheists are the brothers of the polytheists’, the Islamic terror organisation has threatened to attack Hindus over the ongoing blasphemy row and demolition of a part of a mosque in the Jahangirpuri area of Delhi.

The terror organisation had also threatened to conduct attacks against India wherever possible. 

Rajasthan: Two policemen deployed for the security of chief minister Ashok Gehlot’s hoarding in Jaipur

OpIndia Staff
-
0
Rajasthan: Two policemen deployed for the security of chief minister Ashok Gehlot’s hoarding in Jaipur

The Rajasthan government has deployed two policemen to protect the chief minister Ashok Gehlot’s hoarding displayed at a major square in the state capital Jaipur. It is notable that the state police have failed to maintain the law and order situation in the state in the recent past. Against this backdrop, deploying two policemen to the security of the hoarding is seen as a waste of resources at a time when police are not providing security to citizens in the state who are under threat and need it the most.

Police are bound to be deployed in the security of CM, but there is such a place in Jaipur, where hoardings of CM Ashok Gehlot have also got police protection. This hoarding has been put up at Gandhi Circle. Two policemen of Gandhinagar police station are deployed round the clock just to secure these hoardings.

Even if someone hovers around this hoarding, these policemen start questioning. These policemen sit on the pavement with a chair just in front of the hoarding. Sometimes women police are also engaged in shift-wise duty. Policemen are mostly posted in civil dress.

According to a report by Dainik Bhaskar, constable Krishna Yadav who was posted here on Thursday, 13th October 2022, said, “I am posted in Gandhinagar police station, now I am taking care of the security of CM’s hoardings.”

The Gandhi Nagar police station in-charge Nemichand said, “It is not any permanent posting of the police staff but they are just deployed in the security of the hoardings. By the way, it is government property and the responsibility for its security lies with the municipal corporation. Yet our policemen also protect it. Because here any random person sticks his own posters and hoardings at this place.”

Dr. Satish Poonia is the Rajasthan state unit’s president of the Bharatiya Janata Party. He tweeted, “Never in the history of Rajasthan have you seen such an insecure chief minister. Binod is also surprised to see this scene. How will crimes stop in the state if the Chief Minister is worried only about his poster?”

BJP IT cell head Amit Malviya tweeted, “The Rajasthan government could not provide security to Kanhaiya Lal and due to which he was brutally murdered. But in the Congress government, the police are deployed 24 hours for the security of chief minister Ashok Gehlot’s hoardings. Is the safety of hoardings more important than the lives of the public?”

The police did not provide security to Kanhaiya Lal

It is notable that a Hindu tailor Kanhaiya Lal, who was beheaded on 28th June 2022 for supporting former BJP spokesperson Nupur Sharma, had also asked for security about a week before his murder, but the Rajasthan police failed to provide him security. As a result, he was killed in an attack by Jihadis.

Kanhaiya Lal was receiving death threats from Jihadis after he shared a social media post supporting Nupur Sharma who was at that time in the middle of a controversy for having allegedly insulted the Prophet Muhammad during a TV debate. The police did not take cognizance of the request by Kanhaiya Lal and did not provide him with any security despite repeated death threats. Instead, the police advised him to stay at home for a few days. Now, this hoarding of chief minister Ashok Gehlot is secured by two policemen.

IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva hails the Indian economy as “a bright spot in a dark horizon”

OpIndia Staff
-
0
IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva hails the Indian economy as “a bright spot in a dark horizon”

On Thursday, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) lauded India as “a bright spot in a dark horizon” owing to India’s fast-growing economy even in challenging times. India, according to IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva, deserves to be called a bright spot on this otherwise dark horizon because it has been a fast-growing economy even during these difficult times. “Most importantly, this growth is backed by structural reforms,” Georgieva said at a media briefing when asked about her expectations from India’s G20 presidency next year.

The top IMF official also hailed India’s digital economy on the sidelines of annual meetings of the Board of Governors of the IMF and the World Bank Group (WBG) in Washington DC. “The digital identity that provides all services and support on the basis of “digital access” is the remarkable success of digitalization in India,” Georgieva said.

Georgieva also asserted that India will leave a mark in the areas of digitalization and digital money. “We know that we need regulation of cryptocurrencies, more attention is needed on cross border payments, we are proposing public investments in the cross border payment platform infrastructure,” she added.

IMF’s Managing Director speaking about renewable energy said, “India has really leapfrogged in terms of solar and other forms of renewable energy. So I am looking forward to next year and I am sure that it would  make the people of India very proud.”

Earlier on Wednesday, Paolo Mauro, the Deputy Director of the Fiscal Affairs of India said that India’s digital cash transfer scheme and several other social welfare programs are a ‘logistical marvel’.

While addressing a Fiscal Monitor press conference, he asserted that there is a lot to learn from India. “From India, there is a lot to learn. If I look at the case of India, it is quite impressive,” he said.

Mauro underlined the sheer size of the country, saying it is a “logistical marvel” that several programs aimed at assisting low-income people reach hundreds of millions of people. He also highlighted that there are various welfare programs specially meant for women, the elderly, and farmers.

Notably, this praise for Indian economic growth comes as the country continues to maintain its position as the fastest-growing economy in the world despite lowered GDP growth projections.

“The outlook for India is for growth of 6.8 percent in 2022, a 0.6 percentage point downgrade since the July forecast, indicating a weaker-than-expected outturn in the second quarter (April-June) and more subdued external demand,” the IMF stated in the latest World Economic Outlook report.

The IMF projected 7.4 percent GDP growth for India in its July 2022 report. The IMF’s latest GDP growth projection for India is lower than the Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) forecast of 7% for the fiscal year 2022-23.

1...2,7612,7622,763...7,578Page 2,762 of 7,578